Advanced Search

The Provisions On "operational Programme Infrastructure And Services" Appendix 3.6.1.1 Activity "national And Regional Development Center, Promotion Of Balanced National Development"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi" papildinājuma 3.6.1.1.aktivitāti "Nacionālas un reģionālas nozīmes attīstības centru izaugsmes veicināšana līdzsvarotai valsts attīstībai"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 91 in 2010 (26 January. No. 5 66) provisions on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix 3.6.1.1 activity "national and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' priorities 3.6 Appendix "Polycentric development" contributes "UR3.6.1.pas Support for sustainable urban development and the role of" activity "3.6.1.1 National and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development" (hereinafter referred to as activity);
1.2 project submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project and the project application to the applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. The purpose of the activity is to ensure that the provisions laid down in point 22 of the national and regional development centre (the city of) growth, providing support for the implementation of the project and the role of the urban competitiveness, affordability or availability and attractiveness factor for development in accordance with the local development programs. 3. the activity exercised limited project application selection. 4. activities supported under the project shall be financed from the European regional development fund co-financing and national public co-financing. Activity within the available public funds is 209 216 720 dollars, including the European regional development fund co-financing – 177 834 211 dollars and national public financing-31 382 509 lats. 5. The European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed 85 percent of the project's total eligible costs. 6. the project co-financing from the applicant not less than 15 percent of the project's total eligible costs. 7. the implementation of the activity provided by the regional development and Municipal Affairs Ministry as responsible authority and the Agency for regional development as a collaborative body. 8. the responsible authority shall have the following functions: to provide activity 8.1 implementation, supervision and control of the implementation of the activity, conditions and application evaluation criteria project, analyze the problems in the implementation of the activity and provide the managing authority and the European Union's structural funds and the Cohesion Fund Monitoring Committee proposals for the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
8.2. to develop and approve the project application form filling methodology;
8.3. provide the related with the activity of information and publicity measures at the level of the activity, including informing the applicant of the project the project application and selection criteria;
8.4. to send a limited range of applicant projects call for project submissions;
8.5. to develop and approve internal written procedures for the evaluation of the application of the project – project application selection, evaluation and decision-making procedures of evaluation and the application of projects project application form of evaluation methodology, cost-benefit analysis development methodology, cost effectiveness analysis development methodology, project submission for the evaluation of the Commission's rules;
5.3. create project submission Evaluation Commission;
8.7. to ensure the application of the evaluation of projects;
8.8. to take a decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition, and to monitor the fulfilment of the conditions;
8.9. to ensure that the activity is not exceeded the available for the implementation of the European regional development fund co-financing and monitoring that the acquisition of co-financing, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle laid down in the execution of the activity level;
8.10. the monitoring of the activity of the European Union to use the structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and accumulate in the data on projects consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
8.11. assess cooperation institutions prepared information on the amendments, and to give an opinion on the amendment. 9. Cooperation authority has the following functions: to develop the agreement 9.1 the project for the implementation of a project;
9.2. consider the beneficiary's payment request prepared a schedule for the submission;
9.3. the development of methodological guidance for project implementation and monitoring requires documentation preparation;
9.4. check and submit a procurement monitoring Bureau funding procurement plan drawn up by the beneficiary;
9.5. to conclude an agreement with the beneficiary of the financing for the implementation of a project;
9.6. provide the information laid down in the regulations on the procedures foreseen in the State budget of the Fund of the European Union for the implementation of projects co-financed, make payments and preparation of the declarations of expenditure for the preparation of the State budget;
9.7. Agreement amendments to the assessment of the implementation of the project and to take a decision on the amendments to the project;
9.8. provide project supervision and control of implementation, as well as the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle laid down in the execution of the project;
9.9. the preparation of the information to the authority responsible for the implementation of the activity of learning available funding;
9.10. checking and match beneficiaries to prepare project reports;
9.11. administer the national budget funds to check the beneficiary's payment request submitted, to approve the amounts of the eligible expenses to prepare payment orders and declarations of expenditure;
9.12. to carry out random checks project locations, provide technical content assessment and verifying the functionality of the project site;

9.13. the activity related to the information and publicity measures for the project level;
9.14. project monitoring to the use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and accumulate in the data on projects consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system. 10. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority. II. Project activities and costs in the following 11 Projects eligible: 11.1. national or regional development center (City) territory, raising competitiveness or urban development, focused on the economic, traffic, social, educational, cultural or tourist infrastructure development or create the appropriate municipal development programme priorities by promoting the use of infrastructure, accessibility and affordability of public services;
11.2. the structural funds of the European Union information and communication activities. 12. The project has assisted the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 of the specific steps needed to implement the project planned by the European regional development fund co-financed activities, as well as the closely related and focused on the promotion of employment. 13. To ensure that the project planned in the application costs do not overlap with the cost for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the project may also be eligible for the implementation of the activities for which it has used to receive foreign funding, financial assistance in the framework of other activities, but the aid has not been sufficient authorities defined in solving this problem. 14. The project is not eligible activities: 14.1. these provisions are not mentioned 11 and 12 point, not conducive to the rule laid down in paragraph 2, the objective of the activity and does not correspond to the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999 of the requirements of article 4;
14.2. is not related to the law on local self-government of the autonomous action of the set of functions and their enforcement. 15. the project eligible indirect costs are: 15.1 with project activities directly related to the cost of publicity;
15.2. contingencies, not exceeding five percent of the total eligible direct project costs. 16. eligible direct costs of the project are: 16.1. preparation of the documentation supporting the project costs (excluding project submission form fill), taken on 24 October 2006, not exceeding 10 per cent of the project total eligible costs: 16.1.1. a construction, renovation or simplified simplified reconstruction plans, the development of the documentation provided for all project activities;
16.1.2. audit, inspection, survey costs, if it is a prerequisite for the construction, renovation or simplified simplified reconstruction conception for the development of the documentation;
16.1.3. cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis. Feasibility of the development is eligible if it is started before the entry into force of these regulations;
16.1.4. legislation on environmental impact assessment for a specific document preparation;
16.2. year of construction, renovējam, compensated or restaurējam facilities construction cost: 16.2.1. traffic transport, bridge, street, road infrastructure development, including rain water sewer infrastructure development;
16.2.2. municipal building infrastructure development including energy efficiency measures;
16.2.3. water supply, sewage and municipal sewage collection and disposal, installation traffic transmission infrastructure, bridge, street, road infrastructure development project in the territory on the date of submission of the project is defined in the public service and the nature of the need, as well as in the public service for which the consumer is required to provide the services;
16.2.4. heating, water supply, municipal sewage and waste water collection and discharge infrastructure traffic transport, bridge, street, road infrastructure development project, if a project scheduled traffic carried, bridge, street, road infrastructure construction activities, there is a public service for the provision of the necessary infrastructure at risk of deterioration;
16.3. new, renovējam, compensated or restaurējam municipal building functionality needed for all public service renewal or termination;
16.4. the efficiency of public transport, including public transport routing optimization, staging out of and a new staging of construction;
16.5. the regional planning;
16.6. the project will create the infrastructure necessary for the development of fixed installations (except production facilities) and the stationary equipment purchase and installation, up to 30 percent of the project total eligible costs;
16.7. autoruzraudzīb and building costs;
16.8. the costs associated with building commissioning;
10.5. the value added tax payments that are directly tied to a project if the beneficiary cannot recover in the laws on value added tax established;
16.10. the holders of the European Social Fund, not exceeding 10 percent of the total eligible project costs, including the promotion of social inclusion, training and organising a membership, subsidised jobs and practice costs. 17. Costs are eligible if they: 17.1. This provision required 11 and 12 above for the implementation of the activities and comply with the principle of sound financial management, in particular in the socio-economic benefit or cost effectiveness;
17.2. made after June 1, 2009, and if the idea of the project is coordinated by the Coordination Council, except that rule 16.1. in point costs;

17.3. it is separately documented when applied to the holders of the European Social Fund. 18. the project eligible costs not directly related to the project are: 18.1. project created in the development of infrastructure facilities and equipment required (not considered fixed) purchase and installation;
18.2. costs that exceed this rules 15.2, 16.1 and 16.6.16.10., subparagraph and paragraph 20 of the eligible costs laid down;
18.3. the administration of the project;
18.4. the accident and resulting in the implementation of the project the value of insurance;
18.5. the audit, except that rule 16.1.2. in point costs. 19. the following costs shall not be included in the project: 19.1. costs not specified in these rules 15, 16 and 18;
19.2. costs incurred prior to 24 October 2006. 20. The maximum available in the European regional development fund eligible costs are: 20.1. Daugavpils City municipality – 22 408 905 lats;
20.2. Liepājas City municipality – 21 670 255 lat;
20.3. the city of Jelgava municipality-18 058 545 lats;
20.4. the municipality of Rezekne and Ventspils City municipality, each 16 334 570 lats;
20.5. Jēkabpils City municipality and the municipality of the city of Valmiera – each 13 415 125 lats;
20.6. Cesis district municipality-10 163 250 lats;
20.7. the Kuldīga district municipality, Saldus district municipality, Līvāni municipality municipality, Talsi district municipality, Aizkraukle district municipality – each 6 419 410 lats;
12.9. the Gulbene district municipality, district of Madona municipality, smiltene district municipality – for each 4 645 605 lats. 21. the total eligible costs of the project amount is not less than 500 000 LVL. III. requirements for project and project submission to the applicant 22. the applicant is a national Project or regional development centre – Aizkraukle district, Cesis district, Daugavpils, Gulbene municipality, Jelgava, Jēkabpils city city, MA County, Baltimore City, Līvāni district, Madona district, the city of Rezekne, Saldus district, smiltene, Talsi district municipality, the city of Valmiera and Ventspils City-municipality or its established authority. 23. the applicant carried out the project cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis under the guidelines laid down by the responsible authority. 24. the cost effectiveness analysis, the applicant chooses the project cost efficiency best solution, ensuring that the project planned in the cost per unit of the benefit does not exceed the authority specified the cost effectiveness ratio per unit of measure of planned investment. 25. The European regional development fund co-financing rate deficit this provision referred to in paragraph 16.2.3 costs determined in accordance with the "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix 3.5. priorities "environmental infrastructure and environmental friendly energy contributes" UR3.5.1.pas "environmental infrastructure" 3.5.1.1. activity "of the water management infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000" under the Cohesion Fund co-financing rate of water shortage, municipal sewage and waste water collection and disposal costs of infrastructure construction in the national or regional interest Development Center (City) territory. 26. If the project makes this provision referred to in paragraph 16.2.3. investments, infrastructure objects are supported by the implementation of the project is the property of the municipality and can be invested in a municipal corporation or a municipal control of the company's share capital under the laws of State and local government owned capital shares and enterprises, as well as commercial support for control, if the service provider is a public municipal corporation or municipal control of an existing company or leased under the legislation on public procurement and commercial support control, if the public service provides the municipal corporation, local government controlled company or other public service providers. If the project makes this provision 16.2.4. investments referred to ownership of the supported infrastructure does not change. 27. the project applicant project application form, including the project submission form attachments, prepared and presented in accordance with this provision, 1. the requirements set out in the annex. 28. the project submission form to add to the project application, the municipal development programme and its amendments (if applicable), the cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis a copy of the electronic medium and accompanying such originals, copies or notarized copies, which is proof of the appropriate authorities of compliance with the original copy: 28.1. cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis;
28.2. construction (including public service infrastructure needed for internal wiring and the equipment and the external inženiertīkl, traffic overpasses, bridges, street, road infrastructure equipment) the cost estimate, prepared and approved in accordance with 501 et seq of the LBN-06 "Būvizmaks discovery procedure", as well as other costs (including the fixed installations, fixed equipment and machinery and equipment, which is not considered a fixed cost (if applicable)) that includes at least the following information: 28.2.1. Optional product name;
28.2.2. number of units;
28.2.3. unit price without value added tax and with it;
28.2.4. the total amount, exclusive of value added tax and with it;
28.3. the technical design stage construction plan or simplified renovation or reconstruction plans simplified documentation developed and approved in accordance with the regulations on general provisions, according to all the project planned activities;
28.4. the law on environmental impact assessment of certain documents;
28.5. local authorities a copy of the regulations, the application shall be accompanied, where the local authorities;
28.6. project management personnel involved in the life course descriptions (curriculum vitae);
28.7. documents proving ownership of the infrastructure facility or the objects in which it is planned to invest:

28.7.1. real estate objects – local ownership by supporting documents – extract from the land register or, failing that, a certificate for being the property of the municipality and State land cadastre service certificate;
28.7.2. other infrastructure assets – for being in the property, the purchase contract or other evidence of ownership;
17.9. If the project is intended for the provision referred to in paragraph 16.2.3. investments: 28.8.1. contracts that meet the Business control law in support of the requirements set out in article 21.1 and concluded with a public service provider for the public service;
28.8.2. the public service provider could design technical regulations;
46.8. If the project is intended 16.2.4. these provisions referred to in paragraph 28.9.1. investments: a contract that meets the business control law in support of the requirements set out in article 21.1 and concluded with a public service provider for the public service;
28.9.2. certified civil expertise opinion on public service infrastructure necessary for the risk of damage by reference to all the territories in which the project is planned to make investments;
28.9.3. the public service provider could design technical regulations. IV. Project application selection 29. project application selection organized by sending a call for project submissions that the project mentioned in paragraph 22, applicants who do not have an agreement for the implementation of a project for all the rules laid down in paragraph 20, the maximum available under the European regional development fund co-financing the project, determining the application submission period, of not less than 90 working days. The project application selection organized in rounds until the applicants have concluded a draft agreement for the implementation of projects for all the rules set out in paragraph 20 of the European regional development fund co-financing. 30. the applicant shall provide the project responsible body project submission and the rules set out in paragraph 28 of the document in one instance: 30.1. on paper, in person or by post. Documents are presented according to the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document and inserts the sealed container (envelope or box). If the application is sent by mail, at the time the project is considered the day when a project application is transferred to the post office. In the event of a dispute, the project applicant proves the fact that the consignment is placed in the mail. If the application is submitted in person, at the time the project is considered to be the moment when the representative of the authority responsible has made the mark to the project application for the project;
30.2. the electronic form of the document, according to the laws and regulations governing the circulation of electronic documents. About the project the application time is considered to be the moment when the project submissions sent by email or through the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the applicant demonstrates the fact that the application sent to the project submission deadline. If the responsible authority submits that the application is received, so this claim justified. 31. the project submission Evaluation Commission composed of three regional development and local government Ministry representatives and one by the Ministry of transport, Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Ministry of environment and Ministry of culture representative of the voting members of the Commission. 32. the responsible authority shall be invited to participate in the project application for the evaluation of the work of the Commission by one cooperation authorities and managing authorities representative as an observer. 33. the project application for the evaluation of the Chairman of the Commission is the authorities. Project submission Evaluation Commission President is a voting member of the Commission. 34. The authority responsible for the evaluation of application projects of independent experts call upon the public procurement regulatory laws. 35. the project submission Evaluation Commission received project submissions valued under this provision listed in annex 2 of the draft application evaluation criteria. 36. the project submission's compliance with this provision in annex 2 specific administrative, compliance and criteria for granting the aid is assessed by the "Yes" (match), "partial match" (provided) or "no" (not match). Project compliance with this provision of the application, 2. quality criteria laid down in annex scored, giving a certain number of points. 37. Where the submission, subject to this provision in annex 2 of the draft application evaluation criteria, does not meet any of the administrative or the eligibility criteria identified as not to be, or not receiving the minimum number of points corresponding to one of the quality criteria, evaluation of the application, the project could not continue. 38. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if: 38.1. the project submission complies with all the rules set out in annex 2 of the administrative, compliance and supports the award criteria;
38.2. the project is executed in the application of this provision in annex 2 quality criteria laid down minimum requirements;
38.3. the project the application of these provisions in annex 2 criteria for the assessment of quality has received at least 17 points. 39. the head of the authority responsible for the application of the project, if approved, subject to the submission of the project need to clarify, according to one of the rules set out in annex 2 of the administrative, compliance and supports the award criteria, which allows the updating of the project application. 40. This provision, paragraph 39 of the condition can include: 24.9. requirement to provide additional explanation;

40.2. other activities necessary to ensure compliance with the application of the draft provisions set out in annex 2 of the administrative, compliance and supports the award criteria, which allows the updating of the project application. 41. where these rules 39 and 40 above conditions affect any other provisions of this annex 2 criteria laid down in conformity assessment, the responsible authority decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition accompanied by appropriate instructions. 42. This provision set out in paragraph 39 of the decision, the conditions contained in a period not exceeding 30 working days from the date of the decision. 43. the responsible authority shall take this provision set out in paragraph 39 of the decision contained in the conditions test and seven working days after the conditions of receiving the dossier sent to the applicant an opinion on draft conditions. 44. If the rules set out in paragraph 39 of the decision contained in the conditions are not met or are not met, this provision of the deadline laid down in paragraph 42, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. 45. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the project, if the rejection of the application: the application does not project 45.1 meets one of the rules set out in annex 2 of the administrative and eligibility criteria that do not allow updating of the application of the project;
45.2. the project submission does not comply with the provisions of annex 2 quality criteria specified in the minimum requirements;
45.3. the project the application of these provisions in annex 2 criteria for the assessment of quality has not won at least 17 points. 46. the responsible authority shall ensure that information on the approved design submissions were published on the website www.raplm.gov.lv. V. implementation and monitoring of the project 47. cooperation authority agreement for the implementation of the project by the beneficiary of the financing switch according to the regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds. 48. The beneficiary within five working days after the agreement on the conclusion of the implementation of the project shall be submitted to the liaison body of the procurement plan, prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds. 49. the project the applicant within 10 working days after this provision referred to in paragraph 38 of the decision or the rules referred to in paragraph 43 of the opinion of the submitting institution for cooperation for the submission of the request for payment schedule, prepared in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the liaison bodies. 50. If the payment schedule for the submission of requests for objective reasons are required to make changes, the beneficiary shall submit five working days the cooperation institution submitting the request for payment of an updated schedule. 51. If the project is co-financed by the beneficiary of the credit means it within five working days after the conclusion of the project the loan agreement shall be submitted to the liaison body of the notice of loan and received a copy of the loan agreement. 52. If the project applicant within 30 working days of the rule referred to in paragraph 38 of the decision or by the rules referred to in paragraph 43 of the opinion of the authority has not appeared to close a cooperation agreement for the implementation of the project, the cooperation agreement is not concluded and the authority shall inform the competent authority. 53. The beneficiary shall ensure the first tender tender not later than three months after the agreement on the implementation of the project. If, within that period, the first tender has not been announced, the authority shall decide whether the cooperation necessary to terminate the agreement for the implementation of the project. 54. after the agreement for the implementation of a project, the cooperation body, if it is available in the State budget, on the basis of the beneficiary's written request, provide advance funding for the requested advance payment according to the regulations on the procedures foreseen in the State budget to fund the European Union co-financed the project implementation, as well as make payments and preparation of declarations of expenditure. 55. cooperation authority, providing advance and interim payments shall comply with the condition that the total may not exceed 90 percent of the project to the European regional development fund co-financing and Government co-financing. 56. The beneficiary shall submit a request for payment of the cooperation body, costs copies of supporting documents and project reports according to the terms of the agreement for the implementation of a project deadlines and procedures. 57. The liaison body shall be reduced on a pro rata basis of funding granted to the project in the following cases: 57.1. where the actual use of the funds is less than lay down the agreement on the implementation of the project;
57.2. If not implemented in any of the transactions provided for in the agreement on the implementation of the project, but the aim of the project is reached;
57.3. where no opposition to the use of the funds supporting documents;
57.4. If the payment request by the eligible costs are not proportionate and economically justified;
57.5. If the beneficiary has misled the authorities or the liaison body, giving false information;

57.6. If the use of the financial resources is carried out in accordance with legislative requirements in the area of public procurement, as well as if the project is intended 16.2.4 16.2.3. these rules and. investments referred in accordance with legislative requirements, the business support area of control. 58. cooperation authority, reviewing the interim or final report, have the right to invite independent experts in the field of public procurement regulatory laws in order to verify the payment request specified eligible costs in compliance and reasonableness. 59. The project no longer than until 2015 December 31. 60. the responsible authority shall control the funds learning not to be exceeded this rule in paragraph 4, the specific amount of the activity. If the project will reduce the total amount of eligible costs the determining authority, on the basis of the updated European regional development fund co-financing the remainder controlled by the rule set out in draft paragraph 20 the applicant the maximum available under the European regional development fund, the cost amount of the calls for project submissions in this current round of rules set out in point 22 of the project applicants. 61. The beneficiary shall ensure that the eligible expenditure, repayment of which is from the European regional development fund co-financing and national public co-financing funds, as well as the implementation of the project-related revenue, cash flow, assets and liabilities accounting records are identifiable, separate and verifiable. 62. All project-related changes in the beneficiary with the cooperation of the authority. 63. the objectives of the project related changes, this provision in principle, referred to in point 5.5. implementation and monitoring of the cooperation sought authority within 10 working days of coordinated with the responsible authority. 64. The beneficiary is directly responsible for the maintenance of the project's results according to the time limit laid down in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 57, paragraph 1. If the project makes this provision referred to in paragraph 16.2.3. investment and infrastructure projects supported by the project investing municipal corporation or local control of company's share capital, the beneficiary shall ensure that the contract for the provision of the public service is a set of supported infrastructure maintenance period, corresponding to the Council on 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 57 (1), and at least until the end of this period the municipality owns more than 50 percent of the share capital of a corporation or company. 65. The beneficiaries of all projects within the hospital facilities and equipment, as well as the municipal building where the investment is made, at least five years after the implementation of the project shall be insured against natural disasters, third party unlawful acts or accidents cause loss or damage. 66. the responsible authority, the authority and the beneficiary shall keep all the project-related original documents until 2021 December 31, as well as the European Commission and the authorities of the Republic of Latvia access to this documentation. VI. final question 67. Be declared unenforceable in the Cabinet of Ministers 27 May 2008. Regulation No 377 ' rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix 3.6.1.1 activity "national and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development" (Latvian journal, 2008, 101, no. 150, 159, 197, 2009. no). Prime Minister v. dombrovsky, regional development and local Government Minister e. Zalān of regional development and local government Ministry's proposed version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 26 January 2010 Regulation No. 91 of regional development and local Government Minister e. Zalān in annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 26 January 2010 Regulation No. 91 of the administrative criteria ranking system – yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 1. project proposal is prepared in paper form and submitted personally or sent by mail in a sealed container (envelope or box) or to prepare electronic the document, filed in electronic form, signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp of the N 2. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the time limit set in the invitation N 3. Project applicant is invited to submit a project application to the N 4. project application has been submitted in one original N 5. project application submitted is cauršūt (caurauklot), where the application is submitted in paper form P 6. All project submissions page is numbered P 7. application is made in the project, according to the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 February 2010 No. 91 "provisions of the rules operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' addition of 3.6.1.1 activity "national and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified in annex 1 to the project submission form, and all of the forms are filled in the section 8 project application P drawn into P 9. project application form is accompanied by all of the provisions laid down in paragraph 28 and according to the accompanying document drawn up in application of the project 10 P is not stipulated in the undertaking , aizkrāsojum, erasures, deletions or additions, if the project application submitted in paper form P eligibility criteria scoring system – yes/no eligibility criteria of the project Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 11. Project meets the objective of the activity – provide specific national and regional development centre (the city of) growth, providing support for the implementation of the project and the role of the urban competitiveness, affordability or availability and attractiveness factor for development in accordance with the local development programmes N 12. Project planned activities comply with the law on local self-government of the autonomous action of the set functions N 13. project activities are reasonable, proportionate with the planned time schedule and ensure the achievement of the objective of the P


14. the activities of the project comply with the provisions of paragraphs 11 and 12 of the eligible activities set out in P 15. project application is justified, as it will ensure the implementation and monitoring of the project P 16. Project submissions included in the eligible and non-eligible costs comply with the provisions of paragraphs 15 and 16 of those eligible and 18 not eligible costs laid down P 17. Project costs provided for in the application meet the project planned activities P 18. submission of the project are clearly defined target group – national and regional development centre (City)-Daugavpils , Jelgava, Jekabpils, Rezekne, Liepaja, Valmiera, Cesis, Aizkraukle, Ventspils, Gulbene, Kuldīga, Līvāni, Madona, smiltene, Talsi, Saldus, and surrounding area residents and merchants – as well as the planned activities are geared to the needs of the target groups of the project application, P 19. planned results, values and impact of the results are clearly defined, measurable and contribute to the achievement of the objective of the activity P 20. Project budget includes costs are reasonable and justified they match the expected period of the project implementation and operation and is calculated by taking into account the expected market price of a given project year P 21. application of the project financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed P 22. Project of the European regional development fund co-financing shall not exceed the provision laid down in paragraph 5 percentage of P 23. total eligible cost of the project is less than 21 points in a draft of the provisions to the applicant the amount specified in the project application, P 24. European regional development fund eligible costs not exceeding the provision in point 20 project the applicant stated maximum amounts available P 25. European Social Fund project, the combination does not exceed 10 percent of the project total eligible costs (if applicable) P 26. Project planned activities comply with the laws and regulations on the business support requirements of P 27. supporting documentation for the project preparation costs shall not exceed 10 per cent of the project total eligible costs of the project the application of 28 P. planned activities (or part thereof) does not overlap with the activities (or part of the project) for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the project, the applicant may be eligible for funding for the project application 29 N idea is coordinated regional development and local government Ministry's Coordination Council set up N 30. Development Center (City) territory development infrastructure required for fixed installations and equipment purchase and installation costs did not exceed 30 percent of the project total eligible costs P 31. Contingencies should not exceed five percent of the total eligible direct project costs, P 32. project submissions in the as will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the project for at least five years after completion of the project, P. 33 the applicant Project is designed and approved for the municipal development programme N 34. project applicant intends to implement publicity and information measures, consistent with the laws of European Union funds publicity and visual identity assurance requirements P 35. Project has made a cost-benefit analysis, where a project is designed for the income and the project meets the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55 of the requirements, but if the project is not intended for revenue, has been cost effectiveness analysis or cost-benefit analysis N 36. If the project has been cost-benefit analysis, economic profitability of the project is larger than the social discount rate (5.5 percent) and project economic net present value greater than zero, P 37. If the project has been cost effectiveness analysis, project cost per unit of the benefit does not exceed this provision in paragraph 24 to the relevant project activities the maximum cost level P 38. Project activities provide for the reduction of maintenance expenditure on infrastructure after the project or the business activities of the necessary infrastructure or improvement of the PROJECT the applicant P eligibility criteria Scoring System-Yes/No Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 39. Project the applicant complies with the provisions laid down in point 22 of the project applicant Project applicant N 40. is stable and available financial resources P

41. the applicant is not in the project's financial stabilization process N quality criteria ranking system-points scale project quality criteria 42. The project is intended for investment Must receive at least 2 paragraphs 42.1. Development Center (City) infrastructure (traffic, social, cultural, recreational and other) with a development centre (City), as well as with the use of the infrastructure related services to create 6 42.2. Development Center (City) infrastructure (traffic, social , cultural, recreational and other) with a development centre (City) request 4 26.3. Development Center (City) in regional planning 2. comply with the 26.3 42.1 42.2 42.3., and the requirements set out in 0 apakškritērij 43. Project provides an integrated approach to urban infrastructure development, making connections with municipal development program must be received at least 4 points to 43.1. the project provides an integrated approach to urban infrastructure development, including interactions and effects provided outside the municipal territory by providing links to local government development programs, analyzes the current situation, assess the various types of funding (public and private) attachment mechanisms and provide complex solutions of the problem 6 43.2. the project has analysed the current situation and provide associations with the municipal development programme, but not assessed various financing (public and private) Association mechanisms, providing partial problems complex solution 4 26.9 43.1. and are not fulfilled. 43.2. the requirements set out in 0 apakškritērij 44. Project Development Centre (the city) will be saved in the existing and to create new jobs or work will be provided site accessibility options

Must receive at least 2 points 44.1. will be saved to the existing and created at least six new jobs 4 44.2. be saved existing jobs and create from one to five new jobs will be secured 70.4 3. jobs reach or be saved existing jobs, not creating new jobs 2 27.6. will not be saved in the existing and to create new jobs or not will be provided job opportunities within reach 0.45 project management team have the appropriate experience and inadequate project management capacity , professional and technical expertise should be received at least 2 points to 45.1. the project manager shall have higher education (economics, finance or engineering) and at least three years of work experience in the management of infrastructure projects, not less than half of the project management team members have higher education, experience in the implementation of infrastructure projects and professional knowledge in the field in question 4 45.2. the supervisor is higher education and from one to three years of work experience in the management of infrastructure projects at least half of the project management team members have higher education and professional knowledge in the field in question 2 is not fulfilled. 28.1.45.1 and 45.2. the requirements set out in apakškritērij 0 46. project application contains and how reasonable the project complements other approved or planned projects that are funded or planned to be financed from other funds of the European Union activities or other financial instruments should be received at least 2 points in the application of the specified project 46.1 and justified It added that more than one project or project submission 3. project submissions given in 46.2 and justified that it complements the one project or project submission 2. application projects not 46.3 States that it is complementary to one or more projects or project submissions 0 47. project in the application reflect the implementation of the project, the degree of readiness to receive at least 2 points in 29.3. the project activities are approved for construction in the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) and is advertised procurement for project investments infrastructure project activities 6 47.2. has approved the technical design stage construction plan or simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) and to prepare documentation for the procurement project investments in infrastructure project activities 4 47.3. has approved the technical design stage construction plan or simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) 2 are not fulfilled 29.3 29.5.47.2 and 47.3,.. apakškritērij the requirements for the project 48.0 exercise must receive at least 1 paragraph 48.1. to 18 months 3. between 19 and 30 30.0 months 2

48.3. from 31 to 36 months 1. for more than 36 months 48.4 0 criteria on HORIZONTAL priorities 49. project co-financing from the applicant the part of the eligible cost of the project is larger than the regulations for the implementation of the activity required minimum laid down in the co-financing criteria not exclusive 49.1. of more than 10 percent 3. of the six to 10 30.6 percent to 49.3 percent 5.99 2 1 49. project co-financing from the applicant the part of the eligible cost of the project is more about legislation for the implementation of the activity the minimum share of co-financing
50.0 provides specific Project activities the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities must receive at least 2 points 50.1. the project's four and more specific actions to ensure equal opportunities for project 3 50.2. from one to three specific activities to ensure equal opportunities 2. project does not foresee 50.3 specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities in implementing project 51 0. will promote a reduction in environmental pollution, or an existing State of conservation, is a specific negative impact on the environment for the elimination or reduction of criteria not exclusive 51.1. the project will contribute to reducing pollution of the environment or the conservation of the existing situation, there are certain steps the negative impact on the environment for the elimination or reduction of 2 51.2. in implementing the project, will not contribute to reducing pollution of the environment or the conservation of the existing situation, there is no specific negative impacts on the environment for the elimination or reduction of 0.52 project contributes to the development of the information society is not exclusive Criteria 52.1. the project involves electronic service creation or improvement project of 52.2 2. information and communication equipment in 1. the project provides 52.3 electronic services or the establishment or enhancement of information and communication equipment in 0 support award criterion Scoring System-Yes/No Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 53. submission of the project planned activities (or part thereof) does not overlap with the activities (or part thereof) intended for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the P notes. 1 if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected. 2 If the rating is negative, can make a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant to ensure compliance with the laws and the criteria for the activities of the implementation deadline).
Regional development and local Government Minister Zalān in the E.