Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 240, Riga, March 9, 2010 (pr. 21. § 12) the rules on the "operational programme infrastructure and services" apakšaktivitāt "Appendix 3.2.1.3.2. Road safety in Riga" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.2. Priority Areas and the availability of "reach" UR3.2.1.pas "contributes to accessibility and transport systems development" activity 3.2.1.3. "road safety in built-up areas and 3.2.1.3.2." apakšaktivitāt in Riga "road safety in Riga" (hereinafter referred to as apakšaktivitāt);
1.2 project submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project the applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant);
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, the competent authorities and the authorities of functional cooperation in the form of subordination.
2. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt is to improve road safety in Riga, eliminating "black points" or "traffic safety in the dangerous location and improving traffic management and control system (traffic lights, traffic signs), in order to achieve the level of road safety improvement. For example, the intersection of alteration and energy-efficient street lighting, traffic lights and the management and control systems, the development of walkways and pedestrian crossings installed.
3. Apakšaktivitāt implement the project application to the limited selection.
4. the project applicant is within the municipality of apakšaktivitāt, in the territory of which the average population in 2008, according to Central Statistical Bureau data is at least 500 000 inhabitants.
5. the total funding available for apakšaktivitāt 9 679 041 lats, which include the European Regional Development Fund 8 227 185 lats and minimum national contribution 1 451 856 lats.
6. national funding by project.
7. The minimum national funding is 15 percent of the eligible costs of the project.
8. The draft law the applicant duly qualify well on State budget grant co-financing of the project.
9. minimum one project of the European regional development fund co-financing of the project total eligible costs, the maximum is LVL 140 560-8 227 185 lats. European regional development fund shall not exceed 85 percent of the project's total eligible costs.
II. The responsible authority and the liaison body 10. implementation of Apakšaktivitāt provide the responsible authority and the liaison body. The responsible authority is the Ministry of transport, the cooperation body is the Central Finance and contracting agency.
11. The responsible authority has the following rights and obligations: to ensure the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt 11.1 control, analyze problems of implementation and apakšaktivitāt provide the managing authority and the Monitoring Committee for the implementation of the proposals for apakšaktivitāt;
11.2. creating a project application to the Evaluation Commission;
11.3. to develop and approve the project application assessment methodology and forms;
11.4. publish project application assessment methodology and the form of the Ministry of transport's homepage on the internet (URwww.sam.gov.lv);
11.5. to ensure the application of the evaluation of projects;
11.6. to take a decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition and inform the applicant of the project;
7.3. ensure the supervision and control of the apakšaktivitāt, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Council Regulation No 1083/2006), 1 and article 93, paragraph 2, of the implementation of the principle of the apakšaktivitāt level;
11.8. collect information about project submissions under the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and use until a decision on the application for the approval of projects, the approval or rejection of a conditional.
12. cooperation authority has the following rights and obligations: 12.1. develop an agreement on the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement) project;
12.2. to conclude an agreement with the beneficiary of the financing for the implementation of the project;
12.3. to examine the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
12.4. to provide the responsible authority information, necessary for national budget preparation for the request in accordance with the laws and regulations that govern the public financial management and planning of national budgetary resources for the European Union agenda, the Fund co-financed projects, making payments and for the preparation of declarations of expenditure;
12.5. to consider and approve the financing requested progress reports submitted and verified payment requests, approve the payment requests included attributable expenditure amounts, prepare payment orders and submit them to the paying authority;
12.6. to prepare the statement of expenditure and submit them to the certification authority;
12.7. prepare forecasts of payment and submit the payment authority and the managing body;
12.8. to ensure the project risk assessments, prepare each year a draft implementation plan of the site inspection and provide inspection project locations;
12.9. to publish a website on the internet (www.cfla.gov.lv) for information on projects;
12.10. to garner information on the projects, for which an agreement has been concluded, and put it in the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
12.11. the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law in order to plan and implement information and publicity measures at project level (including to provide information about the recipient of the funding agreement conditions) and monitor the publicity measures project locations;
12.12. the half-yearly according to competence to draw up a report on European Union funds and the activities co-financed measures, and once a year, a report on the implementation of the horizontal priorities of European Union funds and the activities co-financed measures and present them to the responsible authority;
12.13. to ensure project monitoring and control, including the Council Regulation No 1083/2006 and article 93, paragraph 2, of the enforcement principle project level;
12.14. to make amendments to the agreement, if necessary, in coordination with the responsible authority.
13. the responsible authority and the liaison body switch interdepartmental agreement, to ensure that responsible authorities and cooperation bodies apakšaktivitāt the implementation of cooperation in the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management article 13 of the law on rights and obligations.
14. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority.
III. Project activities eligible, eligible and non-eligible costs of the project assisted in 15 steps is infrastructure reconstruction and development, as well as improvements in the organisation of traffic in Riga: 15.1 crossings, bridges, tunnels and connection construction, reconstruction and renovation, to improve road safety;
15.2. the street renovation and reconstruction, significantly improving the traffic safety or the organisation of the transport system;
15.3. traffic organization improvements: 15.3.1. traffic control and safety elements of construction and restoration;
15.3.2. traffic organization (road signs, safety barriers, traffic control system elements and their communications and control equipment, the necessary equipment) Setup;
15.4. different levels of pedestrian crossing construction;
9.6. energy-efficient lighting installation;
15.6. a pedestrian and bike path construction;
15.7. public transport stop of the construction;
15.8. the underground communications and public transport infrastructure rebuilding, if its directly related to traffic safety and implementation of the project during the construction occurs in the public service for the provision of the necessary infrastructure at risk of deterioration: 15.8.1. public service infrastructure (water, sewage, heating, public transport) conversion;
15.8.2. gas, electricity and telephony communications infrastructure conversion without changing their technical parameters.
16. The project is not eligible for the following: 16.1 Street stage construction and reconstruction, not related to the safety or the organisation of the transport system measures;
16.2. the car park;
16.3. transport infrastructure maintenance;
16.4. other provisions of this paragraph 15 does not.
17. the eligible costs of the project are: 17.1. project preparation costs (excluding project submission form fill) to 10 percent of the eligible costs of the project: 17.1.1. construction development costs no more than five percent of the eligible costs of the project:

17.1.1.1. technical feasibility;
17.1.1.2. inženierizpēt, which requires the construction of transport infrastructure (geological, hydrological and topographic trying);
17.1.1.3. Design (sketch design, construction and procurement procedures document preparation);
17.1.1.4. document preparation costs according to the laws and regulations on environmental impact assessment;
17.1.2. būvekspertīz;
17.1.3. road safety audits;
17.2. the cost of the works;
17.3. autoruzraudzīb costs;
17.4. building costs;
17.5. publicity measures, in so far as it provides for the European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management regulatory acts;
10.9. the value added tax, which is directly related to the project, if a project applicant cannot recover it according to the laws and tax policy;
17.7. land acquisition costs up to 10 percent of a project's eligible costs if they are necessary for the purposes of the project;
11.1. expenditure for contingencies this provision 17.2, 17.3, 17.4..., and 17.7 17.6 States attributable to cover not more than five percent of the 17.2. these provisions, 17.3., 17.4., 17.6 17.7 in point and the amount of the eligible costs.
18. This rule 17.2 17.3., 17.4.,.,.,., and 11.0 10.9 10.9. the costs referred to in point may be considered eligible if it is made after the entry into force of these regulations.
19. not eligible costs of the project are: 19.1. costs that exceed the approved project submission, the proposed amount of the eligible cost;
19.2. costs not justified by relevant source documents;
19.3. the costs incurred in violation of laws and regulations;
19.4. the rebuilding of underground communications, if the crew capacity by transfer or conversion is increased.
20. the project cost does not include administrative costs of the project.
21. the project application can contain only those provisions referred to in paragraph 17.
IV. submission of the application and the draft selection 22. the responsible authority by sending a letter to invite the applicant to submit these draft provisions appropriate project submissions.
23. If the project application selection is not available in all apakšaktivitāt acquired funds, the responsible authority is entitled to re-arrange the project application selection for the remaining funding.
24. the applicant shall submit a project application to the responsible body within a time limit which it shall specify, for not less than 30 days from the date of dispatch of the invitation.
25. the project submissions prepared according to the project application form (annex 1).
26. the project applicant project application shall be accompanied by the following documents: 26.1. State revenue service certificate (issued not earlier than 90 days prior to the submission of the project), which certifies that the applicant is not the project for tax and the State social insurance compulsory contribution to the debt;
26.2. the written declaration of the Minister of finance in accordance with the law on financial stability and financial supervision of the municipalities "(where the applicant is in the process of financial stabilisation);
26.3. the project manager's description of the life course (curriculum vitae). The project manager must have at least three years of experience in the management of transport infrastructure projects;
26.4. the project management group of civil engineers employed in the life course description (curriculum vitae) and a copy of the certificate. Civil engineers will need at least three years experience in road construction;
26.5 decision of the applicant of the project, stating that it is ready to implement the project. Decision the applicant indicates the project funding;
16.5. the environmental impact assessment of the final report and environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment final report, if the project has undergone an environmental impact assessment;
16.6. projects which do not require environmental impact assessment, add būvvald in inženierplānošan conditions issued (in tasks design) these reconciliations;
16.7. the draft statement by the applicant that the project planned activities comply with the municipal territory planning;
the construction of harmonious būvvald 26.9. a copy of the appropriate construction laws and regulatory requirements;
26.10. "calculation of economic analysis of the draft copy;
26.11. the right of the signature certificate of the person who signed the application for the project;
26.12. local Government Council to initiate the construction of proof is not on the municipality of unauthorized land without the owner's consent (consent of the works) according to article 3 of the law on construction;
26.13. If the project is for the provision of subparagraph 15.8.1. investments: 26.13.1. certified civil expertise conclusion, which found that the project planned investments in certain areas, it is not possible to avoid this provision 15.8.1. referred to transmission or damage to infrastructure;
26.13.2. contract for public service that meets the business supports the control law 21.1 the requirements set out in article;
26.14. If the project is for this provision 15.8.2. investments referred to in point-certified civil expertise conclusion, which found that the project planned investments in certain areas, it is not possible to avoid this provision 15.8.2. referred to transmission or damage to infrastructure;
26.15. the electronic version of the project application to the media (the male form in MS Word documents, MS Excel format). Project application electronic version may not include this rule 26.1 26.2 26.3.,.,.,., 16.4, 16.5 16.5 16.6 16.7.,.,.,., 26.10, 26.9 26.11 26.12 26.13, 26.14., and referred to in the documents.
27. the project application to the project the applicant's signature paraksttiesīg person or authorised person.
28. the project application submitted in person, by post or by electronic means.
29. the project submission in paper form shall be submitted in triplicate (one original and one copy).
30. the project submissions electronically submitted in accordance with the legislation on electronic document design. Project application with secure electronic signature, certified by the stamp of the time before the draft submission closing date and sent to the electronic mail address (inv_dep@sam.gov.lv).
V. Project application procedures and criteria for the evaluation of 31. Apakšaktivitāt project submitted within the application assessment provides the responsible authorities established a project application to the Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission). Panelists include the Ministry of transport and representatives of the responsible authority. The composition of the Commission, approved by the responsible authorities. The representatives of the managing authority is the power to participate in the meetings of the Commission as observers.
32. the Commission is governed by a Statute approved by the responsible authority.
33. the project submission compliance is assessed on the basis of those provisions set out in annex 2 of the draft application evaluation criteria.
34. the project submission's compliance with this provision of the annex 2 section 1 and 2 set out in the evaluation criteria evaluated with "Yes" () or "no" (no matches). The project's compliance with this provision the application to annex 2 set out in section 3 the assessment criteria is assessed by the "Yes" (meet), "no" (non-compliant) or by giving a certain number of points.
35. in order to determine the total number of points in this provision of the annex 2 referred to in section 3, each of the criteria in the criteria for the number of points multiplied by the percentage of the proportion of the corresponding criteria.
36. the project submission's compliance with this provision, section 4 of annex 2 set out in the evaluation criteria evaluated with "Yes" () or "no" (no matches).
Vi. Decision-making and reporting results of responsible authority 37. project application is approved if it meets all the rules referred to in annex 2 of the assessment criteria.
38. the project's responsible authority approves the application, if the application does not need to specify the corresponding to one of the provisions of annex 2 section 1 and 2, the assessment criteria listed in, which allows the application of the project approval with conditions.
39. the responsible authority shall reject the application for the project if it does not match any of the rules referred to in annex 2 of the evaluation criteria, which do not allow for the approval of the application, the project on condition.
40. Where the application does not comply with any of the rules referred to in annex 2 of the evaluation criteria, which do not allow the application to the approval of the project, the responsible authority for the project assessment of the application terminated.
41. the decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection provided the determining authority within five working days after the decision has been forwarded to the project applicant.
42. the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in the project applicant 15 working days of notification of the decision.
43. Within five working days after the conditions for receipt of the supporting documents, the Commission shall evaluate compliance with the conditions contained in the decision and the responsible authority shall draw up the opinion.

44. Where the applicant has complied with the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in the project application is considered and approved by the responsible authority within five working days after that rule 43. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1 shall send to the applicant, project a positive opinion on the conditions contained in the decision.
45. If the decision contains the conditions are not met or are not met this rule 42 time limit expires or these rules, paragraph 43 of the responsible authority opinion is negative, the project application is considered to have been rejected and the responsible authority in the five working days following that rule 43. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1 shall send to the applicant a negative draft opinion.
46. the responsible authority within three working days after the decision to the liaison body shall send the decision on the approval of the project application (the original) along with project applications and attached documents and decisions on project submission rejection (copies).
47. the responsible authority shall publish information on the projects approved by the Ministry of transport on application home page on the internet (URwww.sam.gov.lv).
VII. conditions for the implementation of the project. the project applicant, 48 submitting and implementing the project, the partnership is not.
49. The beneficiary within five working days after the conclusion of the cooperation agreement shall be submitted to the authority in the field of public procurement laws and regulations governing the order prepare procurement plan. If necessary, the recipient of the funding of the implementation of project activities, you can update the procurement plan and submit it for examination to the cooperation.
50. The beneficiary first advertised the procurement procedure not later than within three months after approval of the project application. If the purchase procedure is declared within this cooperation authority shall decide on breakage.
51. The beneficiary in accordance with the concluded agreement provides cooperation authority full details on project implementation (including project progress reports and yearly – project implementation reports (pēcprojekt reports)).
52. the project will be within the framework of the European regional development fund financing (interim payment and final payment), the extent of the payment, and the period for the submission of requests for payment are determined by agreement between the authority and the beneficiary of the financing.
53. The beneficiary shall ensure that the beneficiary institution homepage on the internet is inserted in the current information on the progress of the implementation of the project, where the total European regional development fund and the national co-financing of costs exceeding 350 000 lats.
54. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission, ensuring the achievement of the aims set out in the project.
55. If the project is a violation of the regulations on control of business support, liaison body for the reduced amount of funding allocated for the project.
56. The project up to august 31, 2015. To this period finished, all project activities and take all payments.
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky traffic Minister k. Gerhards traffic Ministry submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 9 March 2010. Regulations No 240 traffic Minister k. Gerhard annex 2 Cabinet of 9 March 2010. Regulations No 240 Project submission evaluation criteria no PO box
1. Administrative criteria ranking system yes/no Criteria impact on decision making 1.
The project applicant is invited to submit a project application to the N 2.
The project proposal is submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the activities of the implementation deadline N 3.
The project application is drawn up into N 4.
Project submission is prepared in Latvian language N 5.
The original application is the project cauršūt (caurauklot) (this provision does not apply if the application of the draft document submitted to the electronic form) N 6.
The project has been submitted to the original and the copy of the application (this provision does not apply if the application of the draft document submitted to the electronic form) P 7.
Project submissions are project submissions in electronic version (can not add attachments) (does not apply to projects submitted by electronic application document) P 8.
The project submission complies with the regulations laid down in the document preparation and design requirements, P 9.
The project application has been drawn up according to the apakšaktivitāt project submission form for N 10.
Draft submission attached any attachments under the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the introduction of the P apakšaktivitāt 11.
Application of the project financing plan and budget summary has no arithmetic errors in a 12 P.
Requested by the European regional development fund co-financing and national funding is calculated arithmetically correct P 13.
The European regional development fund co-financing amount corresponds to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the introduction of apakšaktivitāt limitations P 14.
The European regional development fund co-financing rate shall not exceed the maximum permitted extent of 15 P.
The project application is signed by the person of the applicant in the project paraksttiesīg or its authorized person (the token is attached to the certificate) N 16.
Application of the project financial statement is made in dollars N 2. eligibility criteria ranking system yes/no criteria for the impact on the adoption of the decision of the applicant of the project 2.1 eligibility criteria 17. applicant is a Government Project in the territory of which the average population in 2008, according to Central Statistical Bureau data is at least 500 000 population N 18. Project applicant has provided proof that the project will be implemented in accordance with article 3 of the law on construction conditions N 19.
If the applicant is in the process of financial stabilisation, is submitted to the approval of the Ministry of finance for the implementation of the project N 20. project applicant is not a national tax and social security payment debt N 21. Project applicant has sufficient and stable financial resources to ensure that all cash flows of the project during the Project the applicant 22. N is committed to providing funding for the project from its own resources in case of increase of the cost of the project application N 23 describes the implementation of the project required resources (in the number of staff assigned qualifications, duties and material technical base) N 24. Project management personnel have adequate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical skills (project management personnel will include at least:-one project manager with at least three years of experience in the management of transport infrastructure projects;-one civil engineer road construction area with at least three years of experience in the sector) P 2.2 project eligibility criteria 25. submission of project describes the project management implementation and monitoring of the scheme, P 26., the project has conducted economic analysis N 27. Project economic analysis is used in the social discount rate – 5.5 percent N 28. project economic net present value greater than zero (ENPV > 0) N 29. project economic yield is greater than (5.5 5.5 percent ERR >%)
 
N 30. project transport economic benefit-cost ratio is B/C the N 31 project > 1 corresponds to apakšaktivitāt's aim to improve road safety in Riga, eliminating "black points" or "traffic safety in the dangerous location and improving traffic management and control system (traffic lights, traffic signs). For example, the intersection of alteration and energy-efficient street lighting, traffic lights and the management and control systems, the development of walkways and pedestrian crossing of N 32. submission of project expenditure is proportionate, justified, necessary for the implementation of the project and provides measurable results for the physical creation N 33. project planned in the application monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable N 34. Project planned publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the minimum requirements laid down P 35. Project is not and has not been financed or co-financed from other Union financial sources as well as State and local budget resources, the project planned activities do not overlap with activities financed from other funds of the European Union activities and of other financial instruments within N 36. The project will be completed within three years of the conclusion of the agreement, but not later than 31 august 2015 N 37. project cost specified in the application to the positions meet the Cabinet regulations on the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt cost and approximately
 
P 38. Project has developed a construction N 3. Criteria of quality evaluation system by assigning a certain number of points, the criteria of number of points received 39.

The project's economic benefits of transport (B) and (C) of the cost. The calculation shall take into account traffic accidents cost reductions and user benefits – time savings and operational cost reductions in road transport in relation to the initial investment and maintenance costs.
Points are awarded according to B/C size. For example, if B/C = 2, the project receives this criteria in point B/C 140 points = B/C 70% 40. There is a need for improvements in road safety project (evaluation shall take into account the following aspects: the need considerable traffic safety improvements – 5 0-5-15% of traffic accidents, the number of fatalities, injured, the number of accidents without victims, the number of konfliktpunkt road accident costs;-traffic accident cause analysis by comparison with other analogous meanings and load the streets;
-traffic intensity and composition (existing and prospective), pedestrians and cyclists;
-traffic congestion delays or risks;
– the current shortcomings of traffic organization;
-the State of the infrastructure;
-other specific traffic safety characteristic values) the minimum need for traffic safety improvements-0 41. in implementing the project, greatly improve traffic safety (evaluation takes into account aspects such as the impact on the number and severity of accidents, other specific traffic safety representative indicators) in implementing the project, considerably improve traffic safety – 5 0-5-10% of the project, the minimum will improve traffic safety – 0 42. Project implementation time in less than a year-3 1-3 5% of one to two years – more than two years 2 1 3.1. quality criteria for horizontal priorities ranking system yes/no Criteria impact on decision making * 43. Project has developed special measures for promoting environmental accessibility for people with functional disabilities N 44. Project uses information technology (applied projects, for traffic management systems) N 45. Implementation of the project, will prevent or reduce negative impacts on the quality of the environment N 46. Ensuring the sustainability of the results of the project for at least five years after completion of the project N 4. Funding criteria ranking system yes/no Criteria impact adoption of a decision * 47.
If the submission is 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 43, 44, 45 and 46. evaluation criteria, as well as 39, 40, 41, 42. assessment criteria together received at least 75 points, then the project submissions, listing in descending order, starting with the most points won the the project application selection round application is sufficient funding for the project N * note.
P-if the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition.
N-If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project.
Traffic Minister k. Gerhard