Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 348 Riga 2010 April 13 (Mon. No. 19) the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" within the European external borders Fund, the European return Fund and the European Refugee Fund project selection and the technical assistance for the implementation of the activity issued under the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" within the established fund management law article 14, paragraph 3 (I). General questions 1. determines: 1.1. The General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" (hereinafter referred to as the programme) within the European external borders Fund (2007-2013) The European return Fund (2008-2013) and the European Refugee Fund (2008-2013) (hereinafter referred to as the Fund) project tendering procedure;
1.2. requirements for beneficiaries of the Fund;
1.3. the Fund's project application preparation and submission procedures and their evaluation criteria;
1.4. the Fund's project selection procedures;
1.5. the grant award procedure;
1.6. the Fund's technical assistance activities (hereinafter referred to as the technical assistance activity).
2. the Fund's application forms for the selection of projects and the financial resources available to each activity determine the annual programme Fund (hereinafter referred to as the programme).
3. the Fund's project submissions in the following ways: select a 3.1 organize an open design competition (hereinafter referred to as the open competition);
3.2. organizing a limited selection (limited selection).
II. Foundation project tendering 4. Open tender issued by the managing authority, placing an advert in the newspaper "Gazette" and your website on the internet.
5. A limited selection of the managing authority organised by sending a call for submission of the project of the foundation year program approved by the Fund in the project applicants.
6. Fund project application submission deadline is: 6.1., two months from the open invitation to tender;
6.2. the month of this provision in the invitation referred to in paragraph 5 is dispatched.
7. the managing authority for each programme development fund project application selection rules (hereinafter referred to as the selection rules). Selection rules approved by the managing authority.
8. specify the selection rules in the annual programme of activities, priorities and the financial resources available for the implementation of the project, the maximum time limit for submission of the draft selection form, submission deadline and place contact information that you can apply to the Fund for the project application selection process, and other information that the managing authority considers necessary.
9. the managing authority in its homepage on the internet publish the annual programme, a select statement, the Fund's project submission instructions for the preparation of the guidance, the European Commission established the conditions for compliance manual with respect to costs communicated to gain the support of the European Commission for solidarity and management of migration flows framework programme, and the grant agreement.
III. Requirements for the beneficiaries of the Fund. the Fund's project 10 submission may participate in the selection of the Republic of Latvia, direct or in direct public administration, derived public person, other public or private-law legal person or a representative of an international organisation in the Republic of Latvia, operating in the area, supported by the Foundation (hereinafter referred to as project applicant).
11. the project applicant is responsible for the implementation and management of the project, as well as the results of the project and objectives. The project applicant must not be a mediator.
12. Project are available to the applicant stable and sufficient financial resources and other resources, to determine the extent of implementation of the project to ensure continuity and implementation of the project within the time limit laid down.
13. the Fund may not be eligible if the project applicant, a judgment which has the force of res judicata or prescription of punishment: 13.1. project officer of the applicant or any other person acting on his behalf, is sentenced to criminal penalties in connection with project activities of the applicant;
13.2. the project officer of the applicant or other person acting on his behalf, is found guilty of fraud, bribery or other activities detrimental to the European Union or the Republic of Latvia on financial interests.
14. the Fund shall not be eligible project applicant: 14.1. has tax arrears;
14.2. who has declared bankruptcy;
14.3. the reorganisation or winding-up proceedings.
15. the project will fund the project applicant submissions can also be submitted together with one or more of the partners is subject to the following conditions: 15.1 partner project of the Fund can be either a direct partner directly involved in project implementation and financial partner, participating in project financing;
15.2. the applicant and the project partners before the grant date of conclusion of the contract shall be the subject of a written agreement on cooperation in the implementation of the project.
16. the Fund's project, the applicant may submit an unlimited number of submissions for the project, taking into account that one fund project application must relate to one of the year's programme of eligible activity.
IV. Fund project application preparation and submission of 17 to qualify for the Fund's financing, project selection, the applicant shall be submitted within the time limit set in the managing authority the following documents: 17.1. project application form (annex 1);
17.2. the draft statement by the applicant (annex 2);
17.3. the cooperation partner's certificate (if applicable) (annex 3);
17.4. excess procurement (subcontracting) total basis (if applicable) (annex 4);
17.5. co-financing statement (if applicable) (annex 5).
18. the Fund's project, the application can prepare and submit the lead body personally, send by mail or electronically.
19. the preparation of the Fund's project applicant project application, the following shall be taken into account: 19.1. the Fund's project submission prepared into Latvian language;
19.2. the Fund's application of the project financial calculations in dollars;
19.3. the Fund's procurement projects (subcontracting) total may not exceed 40% of the direct eligible costs, except where the applicant submits the project exceeded the total amount of purchase (subcontracting) grounds, which confirms the Managing Authority Fund projects the application evaluation process;
19.4. the value added tax is applicable, if it is not, directly or indirectly, to the vendor of the recoverable or arise, established in another Member State and therefore unable to recover it.

20. If the applicant is a direct or of the Republic of Latvia in the immediate national regulatory authority or another public authority, the proportion of the eligible costs of the project are the following: 20.1. Fund – 75%;
20.2. State budget – 25% co-financing.
21. If the applicant is a child of the Republic of Latvia's public person or private-law legal person, international organization or representative office in the Republic of Latvia, which operates in the area supported by the Fund, the Fund in proportion to the eligible costs of the project are the following: 21.1. Fund – 75%;
21.2. the State budget financing – 15%;
21.3. the project co-financing by the applicant – 10%.
22. the implementation of a project launched by the Fund: 22.1. public tender Fund projects, starting with a grant date of conclusion of the contract;
22.2. the limited selection of Fund projects – 1 January of the year in which the approved annual programme concerned.
23. the European return fund or the European Refugee Fund project indirect eligible costs ratio relative to the project's eligible costs are direct: 23.1. to 20% if the purchase of the project (subcontracting) does not exceed 40% of the total direct eligible project costs;
23.2. up to 10% if the project procurement (subcontractors) amount is greater than 40% of the direct eligible costs.
24. the European external borders Fund project indirect eligible costs ratio relative to the project's eligible costs are direct: 24.1. to 5%, if the project (subcontracting) purchase cost, equipment cost, and real estate cost does not exceed 40% of the total direct eligible project costs;
24.2. to 2.5% of the project cost of purchase (subcontracting), equipment and real estate cost a total of more than 40% of the direct eligible costs.
25. all projects of the Fund in the preparation of the application stakeholders can get additional information about the Foundation's project application preparation. Questions about the preparation of the application projects of the Fund sent to the managing authority to the e-mail address specified in the select statement, no later than 10 working days before the Fund project application submission deadline.
26. the managing authority answers to questions received shall prepare and publish their website on the internet no later than two working days after the receipt of the question without specifying the question author.
27. in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Latvia on the development of requirements and fund the project design submission cauraukl, stamped, dated, each page number, signature and decrypts the signature, as well as indicate the number of pages.
28. the Fund's application of the project shall be made out in one original. The project required the number of copies of the application determine the selection rules.
29. To fund the project application indicates the "original" or "copy", it shall be submitted in one or more sealed and stamped envelopes or boxes. If the envelopes or boxes is more, its number.
30. On the envelope or box specifies the following information: 30.1. distribution – managing authority, "address";
30.2. the inscription " year of the Foundation programme";
30.3. the inscription " activity";
18.9. the full Fund project name and address of the applicant;
5. the name of the project of the Foundation;
30.6. "not to be opened before the start of the assessment".
31. the Fund's project to add the application to the electronic version of the electronic media, specify the following information: 31.1. "activity";
31.2. the Fund's project name of the applicant;
31.3. the Fund's project name.
32. For the project to the application date and time view: 32.1. managing log Fund specified in the project application, date and time of receipt, if the application is lodged by the project of the Foundation in person;
32.2. the postmark shows the date of dispatch, should fund the project submissions sent by mail;
32.3. the Fund's project application shipment date and time if the Fund's project submission is sent by electronic mail, using the authorities held a special online form.
33. If the Fund's project submission is sent by electronic mail, do not apply these rules 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31. the requirements referred to in paragraph.
V. open competition within the Fund submitted a project submission evaluation projects of the Fund 34. submissions valued under the administrative criteria, quality criteria and specific criteria (annex 6).
35. the Managing Authority Fund project application under the administrative evaluation criteria and quality criteria creates a public tender Fund project Commission for the evaluation of the application.
36. the managing authority shall draw up a public tender Fund project for the evaluation of the application of the Statute of the Commission and fund the project application, assessment and approval procedure.
37. the managing authority shall keep records of the Fund's project submissions in the order of their submission and assigns each identification number.
38. the Fund's project submission driven evaluation, if it meets the following conditions: 38.1. Fund project application is filed within the time limits laid down in the Statute of the selection;
38.2. the Fund's project application is drawn up into the Latvian language;
38.3. the Fund's application is the project caurauklot (does not apply to electronically filed applications for Fund project).
39. If the Fund project application meets all the criteria, the leading administrative authority for further evaluation of their moves according to the quality criteria and submitted to the Management Committee of the Fund for specific evaluation criteria.
40. where the application of the project of the Fund does not comply with these rules for any annex 6 part I 1.1., 1.2., 1.3, 1.4, 1.9, 1.10, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 referred to administrative criteria, the Managing Authority Fund project application rejected.
41. If the Fund's project submission does not comply with the provisions of annex 6, part I, 1.5 1.6 1.7, 1.8, 1.11, 1.12, 1.13.., 2.2., 2.3., 2.4., 2.5., 2.6., 2.7., 2.8., 2.9 and 3.4 referred to administrative criteria, the managing authority shall make a request in writing to the applicant of the project specify the project's application of the Fund or to submit additional information to the managing authorities within the prescribed period.
42. If the applicant for the project of the Foundation of the managing authority is not made within the time limit specified in the project application or for more information, the Managing Authority Fund project application rejected.
43. If the applicant for the project of the fund managing authorities shall be submitted within the time limit set for submission of the project Fund specified or information, the Evaluation Commission evaluated again under the criteria and administrative:

26.8. If necessary updates are not performed or additional information has not been submitted in full, the Fund's project application is rejected;
26.8. If the necessary clarifications have been made or information has been submitted in full, the managing authority shall act according to the rules laid down in paragraph 39 of the order.
44. If the application is rejected for the project of the Foundation according to this provision, or 40 42 or 43.1. (a), the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project.
45. the Fund's project application procedures under the specific assessment criteria determined by the Fund Management Committee Charter.
46. After assessing the Fund's project submission in compliance with the quality criteria and specific criteria, the managing authority shall draw up the Foundation's project submission list, listing them in order of priority by the number of points earned, beginning with the most points won.
47. the Fund's application of the project's total score is obtained by summing the quality criteria and the specific criteria for the number of points and the calculation of the total assessment in accordance with the provisions of annex 6 contains the formula.
48. If several submissions of projects the Fund has got the same number of points, priority shall be given to the submission that won the highest ranking 6. these provisions in part IV of annex II and the aforementioned criteria.
49. the Fund's project submissions, of which the total number of points does not exceed 40% of the maximum possible score, the managing authority is rejected, the project informed.
50. the Fund's project submissions whose total score is greater than 40% of the maximum possible points, driven by the managing authority for approval.
51. Depending on the year the program activity financial means made available, the managing authority will fund the project submissions, which have got the highest score and which requested the Fund can provide 100%. The remaining Fund project submissions included Fund project application to the reserve list.
52. the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the decision of the project fund project application to approve or to be included on a reserve list.
53. Depending on the amount of funds remaining in the activity: 53.1. the Management Committee shall decide the remaining funds be reallocated to the other activities of the Fund, financial resources for capacity building;
33.1. the managing authority shall decide the remaining financial means to redirect the funds included in the reserve list of project submissions for funding.
54. If the annual program of activity do not have the financial resources or the balance of the decision by the Management Committee to act in accordance with this rule 53.1. the procedures laid down in point, the reserve fund included in the list of project submissions rejected by the managing authority, notifying the applicant of the project.
55. where the managing authority adopts this rule 53.2. the decision referred to the reserve fund in the project list submissions a comparison taking into account the provisions of annex 6 part II 2.3, 4.2 and 4.3 the quality criteria referred to in (a) and part III, referred to in paragraph 1 in specific criteria rating.
56. the managing authority of the reserve fund included in the list of project submissions are ranked in order of priority by the number of points earned, beginning with the most points won.
57. the managing authority for approval to move the Reserve Fund on the list of project submissions, who won the largest number of points.
58. If the annual program activity have left enough financial resources to this provision the Fund referred to in paragraph 57 project applications could be funded 100% by the managing authority approves it.
59. If the annual activity programme of the remaining financial means are not enough to this provision the Fund referred to in paragraph 57 project applications could be funded 100% by the Managing Authority Fund project application is approved with the condition that reduced the requested Fund, indicating in writing the project applicant to submit the time limit set by the managing authority of the Fund specified in the project application.
60. If the applicant for the project managing authority is not made within the time limit specified in the project application to the Fund, the Fund's project submission is rejected.
61. Where the managing authority by the applicant within the time limit set, submit project application specified, the managing authority shall check whether the provisions referred to in paragraph 59 of the condition is fulfilled, and 61.1. If the condition is not met, the application is rejected for the project of the Foundation;
61.2. If the condition is met, the project of the Foundation approved the application.
62. If the reserve fund included in the list of project applications refused under this provision, 60 or 61.1. in point procedure, the managing authority for the approval of the next move on the reserve list of the Fund's project application, which won the largest number of points according to the rules in paragraph 58 and 59 of the procedures laid down.
63. The remaining Reserve Fund included in the list of project submissions rejected by the managing authority.
64. the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project fund project approval or rejection of the application.
Vi. the limited selection of Fund projects submitted within the application and evaluation of Fund project 65. submissions valued under the Administration and quality criteria (annex 7).
66. the Managing Authority Fund project application under the administrative evaluation criteria and quality criteria creates a limited selection of project fund application Evaluation Commission.
67. the managing authority shall establish a restricted fund project application selection Commission rules of evaluation and project application, assessment and approval procedure.
68. the managing authority shall register the project and assign them to application identification number.
69. the Fund's project submission driven evaluation, if it meets the following conditions: 69.1. project fund application is filed within the time limits laid down in the Statute of the selection;
EB 69.2. project fund application is drawn up into the Latvian language;
69.3. Fund project application is caurauklot (does not apply to electronically filed applications for Fund project).
70. after the submission of the draft assessment of the Fund's eligibility criteria, the leading administrative authority for further evaluation of their moves according to the quality criteria.
71. the Fund's application of the project's total score is obtained by summing the quality criteria points earned.
72. If the Fund's project submission complies with all administrative criteria and don't need clarification in the application of the project of the Foundation, the leading authority on project submission guide for approval.

73. If the project application to the Fund does not meet even one criterion for administrative or need clarification of the application of project funds, the managing authority shall make a request in writing to the applicant of the project of the Foundation to clarify the application of the project of the Foundation or to submit additional information managing authority within the time limit.
74. After clarification of the application of the project of the Foundation in accordance with the request of the managing authority, the total number of points earned will not change.
75. Where the managing authority, the applicant is not made within the time limit specified in the Fund's project submission or additional information, Fund project application rejected.
76. Where the managing authority by the applicant within the time limit set, submit a project application to the specified or information, the Evaluation Commission evaluated the submitted clarifications or additional information: 76.1. If necessary and clarifications have been made or additional information has not been submitted in full, the Fund's project application is rejected;
76.2. If the necessary clarifications have been made or information has been submitted in full, the Fund's project submission moves.
77. the managing authority for the project assessment, the application shall inform the applicant of the project for the application of the project approval, approval with conditions that will reduce the requested Fund, or rejection.
78. The Fund's application to approve the project, the managing authority shall make a request in writing to the applicant of the project in its deadline to submit project fund application specified.
79. Where the applicant is the managing authority is not made within the time limit specified in the project application to the Fund, the Fund's project submission is rejected.
80. Where the managing authority by the applicant within the time limit set, submit project application specified, the managing authority shall ensure that the provisions referred to in paragraph 77, the condition is satisfied, and: 80.1. If the condition is not met, the application is rejected for the project of the Foundation;
80.2. where the condition is met, the project of the Foundation approved the application.
81. the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project fund project approval or rejection of the application.
VII. Grant of 82. After conclusion of the contract Fund project application approval by the managing authority to the applicant, the project offers to conclude a grant agreement.
83. If the tender project applicant refuses or limits set by the managing authority will provide a grant of conclusion of the contract and if the relevant annual programme activity are available financial resources, driven by the managing authority for approval or approval with the conditions of application of the Fund for the project included in the reserve list for the next project with the highest number of points in that rule 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 and 61 above.
84. at the conclusion of the contract all grant, the managing authority shall inform the Fund project application to the remaining projects on the reserve list of applicants for the project submission rejection.
85. the Grant Agreement shall specify the following information: 85.1. the maximum eligible costs;
85.2. the Fund, the State budget and Fund co-financing project co-financing by the applicant;
85.3. Fund project funding recipient's duties and responsibilities;
85.4. amendment to the agreement and grant the termination order;
85.5. other information that the party considers relevant.
86. the managing authority shall send the quarterly information and audit of certification authority for grant agreements concluded or amended, including: 53.5. grant contract name, number and date;
86.2. Fund financing, co-financing and Government project co-financing by the applicant;
86.3. institution of the said request, grant the contract or amendment thereto.
87. the managing authority shall terminate a limited tender or selection without closing the grant agreement, in the following cases: 87.1. If all projects submitted submissions are rejected;
87.2. If for objective reasons (force majeure, shortage of financial resources), why not the managing authority may enter into a grant agreement with the winner of the open competition or limited selection of applicants.
VIII. Technical assistance activities for the implementation in the 88. Technical assistance activities implemented by the management of such funds, participating in the control and supervision of public administration authorities (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authorities): 88.1. managing authority;
88.2. audit authority;
88.3. certification authority.
89. The technical assistance activities for the maximum available funding for the Foundation, as well as its distribution between the responsible authorities approve the annual programme.
90. The technical assistance activities for the implementation of the related expenditure is covered by 100% of the financing of the Fund.
91. activities of technical assistance in the implementation by the responsible authority, acting in the framework of several funds attributed to the Fund concerned, taking into account available to the authority responsible for technical assistance funding ratio between funds.
92. The technical assistance activities eligible activities and eligible costs are set out in the decision of the European Commission on the implementation of the Fund.
93. in order to ensure that the audit authority and the certifying authority for technical assistance activities, as well as proper separation of these functions, the managing authority with the audit authority and certification authority concluded an agreement on the audit authority and the certifying authority for technical assistance activities.
94. to ensure the managing authorities for the implementation of technical assistance activities, the managing authority shall issue internal legislation.
95. the managing authority 93 these provisions of the agreement referred to in paragraph switch and this rule 94, paragraph internal regulatory acts issued for the implementation of all programmes.
Prime Minister v. Minister of Interior, Dombrovskis Health Minister ad interim Mūrniec of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010 regulations No 348 project APPLICATION identification name of the Foundation Year program activity priority Project applicant project title managing authority fills in!
 
The application of the project date ___ ___/___ ___/__ _____ dd/mm/yyyy number Application No. ____ ____ ____ (I). Information about the project applicant 1.1.  Information about the project the applicant Institution name registration No.
  
Tax registration No.
  
Registered office contact address Body and main activities of the Foundation and the start-up date of the funding source


* Fill in, if the applicant has direct or of the Republic of Latvia of direct public administration, derived public persona, other national authorities.
1.2. the head of the institution contact the Finance Office Manager project manager name title phone fax e-mail address 1.3. information for major projects during the last 3 years ** completed where the applicant is not a project of the Republic of Latvia, direct or direct public administration, derived public persona, other national authorities.
The project number and the name of the source of funds the project budget (LVL) implementation period II. Basic information on the project project name 2.1 2.2. project implementation period start date of the project in the project duration (months) where implementation of the project is scheduled to begin on a particular date or before the conclusion of the contract, the grant of the relevant date. If the date is not known, indicate the first date of the month.
2.3. The estimate for the project total funding (LVL) requested the requested funding (LVL) of the Fund requested the State budget funding (LVL) total funding provided by the applicant of the project (LCY) 2.4. the actual implementation of the project (s) address 2.5. Partners involved in the implementation of the project the institution name registration No.

Tax registration No.

Registered office main activities * applicable, if the partner is not direct-the Republic of Latvia or of direct public administration, derived public persona, other national authorities.
III. Project description 3.1. Situation and problem analysis of the proposed solution to the problem of 3.2 3.3. Project objectives the overall objective of the project the project specific objective 3.4. the project's compliance with the Fund's objectives 3.5. Project's compliance with the national policy planning documents 3.6. compliance with the Project of European Union policy planning documents 3.7. projects and project improvements achieved added value of 3.8. project sustainability and future Outlook of 3.9. Project summary (maximum 300 words) 3.10. detailed description of the measures included in the draft measure no.
Event name description of the measure Results to the target beneficiary ** indicates where the target group.
3.11. Logical planning Matrix project title total Fund budget Fund for general purpose light sources to achieve specific goal Achievement indicators information sources results Achievement indicator suggested sources of information measures Adopters assumptions Assumptions are prerequisites for the implementation of the project IV organization 4.1. Implementation of the project the main responsibilities of the parties involved and a description of the qualifications 4.2. Implementation of the project required logistical description, the degree of readiness of the project project implementation monitoring 4.3 4.4. For the implementation of the project risks and mitigation measures description of Risk Risk mitigation measures 4.5 planned project information distribution and publicity measures for the dissemination of information source for publicity source 4.6. Imposition of the indicative timetable N (years) (years) N + 1 N + 2 (year) months No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 4.7. use of financial resources indicative timetable No.
Event name N (years) (years) N + 1 N + 2 (year) I CET.
(II) CET.
(Iii) CET.
(IV) CET.
(I) CET.
(II) CET.
(Iii) CET.
(IV) CET.
(I) CET.
(II) CET.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

V. project budget estimate to choose Fund project title Project legal status of the applicant, the name of the program you choose 5.1. Total budget 1. eligible costs costs costs% direct 1.1 LVL eligible costs (A) personnel costs (B) equipment costs (C) real property costs D Agreement cost of Subcontractors (E) other direct costs of travel and subsistence costs E1 E2 Consumables and costs of basic services and Training seminars at E3-E4 With EU requirements costs costs costs of services of experts E5 E6 With target group-related costs (F) total direct eligible costs (A – E) 1.2 indirect eligible costs (G) total indirect costs 1.3 costs borne by assigned revenue (H) costs covered by assigned revenue (I) total project costs (sum F + G + H) 2. income (J) State budget co-financed Project co-financing from the applicant K L M of co-financing partners project income fund O N total revenue (J + K + L + M + N) choose to fund the project name the name 5.2. Detailed cost calculation total 0 Measures No.
Measures for the implementation of the required resources amount 1 event name event name 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 event name event name event name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

6 0 0 0 0 7 event name event name event name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 choose to fund the project name the name 5.3. Project financing plan $0 financing source, in total, including by year N (year) to (year) N + 1 N + 2 (year) total project budget (LVL) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fund of the State budget funding for Project co-financing from the applicant 0 0 0 co-financing partners project income 0 select Fund
The project name is the name A 5.4. Staff costs total 0 gross income measure No.
First name, last name, title of project Participation (number of months) the number of hours per month, the hourly rate of the employer State 0 0 0 0 0 0 measure No.
First name, last name, title of project Participation (number of months) gross salary per month social security (the employer) 0 0 0 0 0 0 includes only the costs of remuneration of the persons who are directly involved in the implementation of the project and is the work of a legal relationship with the applicant or project works on a contractual basis, excluding the profit margin (with hourly rate). For example, project manager, project coordinator of the project, the applicant institutions invited expert (specialist) of a project implementation of the measure.
 
Select a fund name, the name of the project B 5.5. acquisition of equipment, technical measures, no 0 total
The name of the objective number unit price for the calculation of the total explanation of equipment (URt.sk. used), supplies, equipment, and technology acquisition (capital expenditure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment, accessories, equipment, technology modernization (capital expenditure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment, accessories, equipment, rental/leasing of technology (current expenditure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 matches only if the equipment purchase, rental or lease is essential for implementation of the project. Buying the equipment before or after the commencement of the project, only the depreciation costs are attributable (purchase price/depreciation period used in the duration of the project x x degree of utilization (%) project). If the price of the equipment (without VAT) is less than EUR 1000, and it is acquired in the first three months of the initiation of the project, the entire purchase amount applies.
 
Select the project name from the funds of the authority name (C) 5.6 real estate total cost 0 Measure No.
The name of the objective number unit price total buildings, structures, infrastructure construction/reconstruction (capital expenditure) 0 0 0 0 acquisition of immovable property (capital expenditure) 0 0 0 0 real property rental (current expenditure) 0 0 0 0 real property purchase is eligible only if it has a key role in the implementation of the project. Office space acquisition or lease costs are included in indirect costs. May include, for example, the project applicant owned facilities project planned activities (seminars, or training).
 
Select the project name from the funds, the name D 5.7 subcontractor contract costs total 0 Measure No.
Description unit number unit price total 0 0 0 this category should include all procurement contracts (without bidding) for the execution of works and provision of services, except employment contracts and contracts for a specific performance (enterprise agreements, contracts of experts), as well as the authorities of the general agreement that is not attributable solely to the project, such as rental of premises, travel. May not exceed 40% of the total eligible costs of the project, except in the case where the applicant, stating the need to agree in advance with the managing authority.
 
Choose to fund the project name the name E1 5.8. Travel and subsistence costs total 0 Measure No.
Position, target location, purpose of the mission, the number of Persons number of days unit price total travel costs 0 0 0 0 mission subsistence costs 0 0 cost of other Hotel travel expenses * 0 * insurance, local transport costs. Travel costs are included in the cost of the Mission of the persons who are directly involved in the implementation of the project, which will carry out support functions and participate in project activities.

Choose to fund the project name name of the authority the cost of Consumables E2 5.9 total 0 measure no.
Description unit number unit price total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 consumables utilities consumables – items that cannot be reused (including fuel) and which are directly necessary for the implementation of the project. Product price is less than EUR 200.
Basic services, maintenance, security, delivery (software, IT equipment), to a maximum of EUR 200.
Must not be included in the communication (telephone, internet, etc.) costs, mailing, room cleaning, utility payments, insurance, office supply costs. These costs must be included in the category of "indirect costs".
 
Choose to fund the project name the name E3 5.10. Training and seminar costs total costs of training Measures 0 0 no.
The description of the number of Hours paid price for the period of training (number of hours) total 0 0 0 0 cost of the seminar the event No.
Cost description number unit unit price total 0 0
 

 
 
 
 
0 includes all costs associated with the training or seminars – room rental, lecturer or presenter fees, training or literature, translation costs, hardware rental, coffee pauses or lunch costs.
The remuneration of the persons involved in the organisation of seminars or training and is a project of the institution of the applicant, be included in the category "personnel costs".
 
Choose to fund the project name the name E4 5.11 with EU requirements related costs total 0 Measure No.
Description unit number unit price total translation costs of publicity and distribution costs 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 Bank or credit guarantees and guarantees for the Audit and evaluation costs 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * At other publicity costs are added also the representation costs incurred by way of exception and in connection with project work (for example the end result of the project presentation and discussion session organised in the Conference room).
 
Choose to fund the project name, the name of the expert services of 5.12. E5 total cost 0 Measure No.
Description unit number unit price total legal advice (t.sk. notary) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 technical expertise in Financial Engineering (t.sk. accounting services) 0 0 0 0 this section includes costs associated with non-regular and special tasks arising from the legal or compulsory examinations. These costs apply only to the one task that is particularly specific, compared with the rest of the project scope. All other costs must be included in the category "subcontracting agreements" or "staff costs".
 
Choose to fund the project name the name E6 5.13 With target group-related costs total 0 Measure No.
Description unit number unit price total 0 0 0 0 0 Include costs associated with the provision of assistance to target groups. Remuneration and expert fees (if applicable) should be included in the respective category. If the provision of the assistance will be provided by the service provider/supplier of goods, the category "subcontracting contracts."
 
Choose to fund the project name the name G 5.14. indirect eligible costs total 0 administrative and support staff costs 0 gross wage measure No.
First name, last name, title of project Participation (number of months) the number of hours per month, the hourly rate of the employer State 0 0 0 0 measure No.
First name, last name, title of project Participation (number of months) gross salary social security (the employer) 0 0 0 0 no measure
A description of the cost of the number of Units price per unit total equipment costs 0 0 0 real property costs 0 0 0 other 0 0 0 direct costs are included in the cost of support personnel remuneration (for example, an accountant, an IT specialist, human resources specialist), administration and management costs (e.g. representation costs, communications services, postal expenses, insurance payments, utilities, rental of office space, office supply costs), fees and charges for banking services.
 
Choose to fund the project name the name H 5.15. Costs covered by assigned revenue total 0 0 gross income measure No.
First name, last name, title of project Participation (number of months) the number of hours per month, the hourly rate total 0 0 0 0 social security employer no Action.
First name, last name, title of project Participation (number of months) gross salary per month social security (the employer) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 total 24.09% Project staff of the applicant in the performance of their daily duties, are also involved in the project (but not funded). The total of these costs must not exceed 50% of the national budget, the project applicant and co-financing partners totals.
 
Select a fund name, the name of the project in total 5.16. revenue 0 J 0 government financing the project co-financing from the applicant K 0 L co-financing partners 0 M project income 0 J 0 government financing the project applicant contribution from the national budget of co-financing the project applicant K 0 Project co-financing by the applicant the applicant's investment Project of the assigned revenue 0 L 0 co-financing partners name description total M project income 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 
 
 
10. VI in addition to submit accompanying documents list no PO box
Application of the project section added (Yes, NA) number of copies of the documents related to the project application 1. Excess procurement (subcontracting) total justification for documents related to the project the applicant (for example, receipts, cognitive) 2. proof by the applicant 3 the project. the project applicant, certified project requesting a copy of the registration certificate of the applicant's certified Project 4 Project Charter, the applicant's articles of association or institution a copy 5.

State revenue service certificate, which certifies that the applicant is the project/no value added tax payer (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or the written consent of the project, in which he authorizes the managing authority or delegated authority to receive this certificate, indicating the national internal revenue service regional Department's address, in which the applicant is established in the project as a tax payer 6 State revenue service certificate certifying that the applicant is not in the draft tax debt (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or the written consent of the project, in which he authorizes the managing authority or delegated authority to receive this certificate, indicating the national internal revenue service regional Department's address, in which the applicant is established in the project as the taxpayer company 7 registry certificate, which certifies that the applicant has the project been declared bankrupt including not in the process of reorganisation and winding-up is located, and the persons who are entitled to represent the applicant for the project (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or the written consent of the project, in which he authorizes the managing authority or delegated authority to receive the said certified statement of the applicant 8 the project signed a co-financing Project applicant 9 URapliecinājums.*, certified project requesting a copy of the annual report for the previous year or If not, for the period of the project the applicant institution's founding date (required if specified in the application for the project co-financing will be provided from the financial means of the applicant) or The bodies of the 10 people, who inquest after approval of the project application, grant to the applicant of the project resources, reference the financial resources to be allocated to the 11.
If the application or any other documents annexed thereto is signed by a person who is not registered for the right to represent the project applicant, shall submit to the authority of the applicant or its certified copy 12. Project management and administration involved in the life course (CV), a description of the task and the necessary qualifications for a description of the documents to be submitted, if the project is construction, reconstruction of buildings, land or rental 13. Būvvald issued by planning and architectural task (if the project is planned for construction , reconstruction or renovation works) 14. Land Registry Department issued a copy of the shore (the land on which the construction of, or intended for buildings for reconstruction or renovation works) 15. Long-term land or building lease contract (which mounted in the land at the time of the initiation of the implementation of the project to completion and subsequent 10 years) documents to be submitted, if the project involves the building of partnership documents submitted to the Latvian language, if the project involves a partnership with the Republic of Latvia registered partners 16. partner Declaration of partnership signed 17 cooperation partner. Certified partner of the copy of the certificate of registration of the 18 State revenue service certificate, which certifies that the partner is not a tax debt (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or the written consent of the partners, in which he authorizes the managing authority or delegated authority to receive this certificate, indicating the national internal revenue service regional authorities the Department address where the partner is registered as a taxable person 19. Business Register certificate showing that the partner has not been declared insolvent, including not in rehabilitation process and is not in liquidation (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or the written consent of the partners, in which he authorizes the managing authority or delegated authority to receive the said certified statement of 20 partners signed co-financing statements 21. certified partners to the project the applicant a copy of the annual report for the previous year or If not, for the period of the project the applicant institution's founding days (required when specified in the application for the project co-financing will be provided from the financial means of partner) 22. The institution or person the certificate of approval after submission of the project partner will allocate financial resources to be allocated in stating cognitive financial resources * documents shall be submitted together with a certified translation partners of the Latvian language, if the project involves partnerships with foreign partners 23. partner Declaration of partnership signed 24. Partners, certified partners for a copy of the registration certificate
  
  
25. The competent national authorities a certificate attesting that the partner is not a tax debt (a certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project). If the national law of the issuing of such certificates shall not provide, submit to the partner's assurance that it has no tax liability 26. The competent national authorities a certificate attesting that the partner has not been declared insolvent, including not in rehabilitation process and is not in liquidation (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project). If the national law of the issuing of such certificates shall not provide, submit to the partner's assurance that it has not been declared insolvent, including not in the bailout process and not in the process of liquidation, the 27 partners signed co-financing statements * 28. partner of the applicant, certified project, a copy of the annual report for the previous year or, failing that, for the period of the project the applicant institution's founding days (required when specified in the application for the project co-financing will be provided from the financial means of partner) its institutions or persons 29 certificate that approval of the application by the project partner will allocate financial resources to be allocated in stating cognitive financial resources *


 

 The total number of pages of the application, the project shall not apply if the project applicant or partner is direct or of the Republic of Latvia in the immediate national regulatory authority.
The head of the institution (name) (signature) (date) Note. Document properties in the "signature" and "date" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Minister of the Interior, the Minister of health ad interim l. Mūrniec annex 2 Cabinet 2010 April 13, Regulation No 348 Project project statement by the applicant the applicant certifies that: 1) implementation of the project will not be tolerated discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation or age, and will be provided equal opportunities for different groups in society;
2) project, the applicant is familiar with the Fund's financing conditions in the course of the implementation of the project and undertake to abide by them;
3 and in the application) project in addition to the documents submitted in the given information is true;
4) the project will be implemented in the public interest, and it does not generate profit;
5) project the applicant is directly responsible for project implementation and management, and the results of the project objectives. The applicant is not a mediator of the project;
6) there is a valid judgment or statement on establishing the applicant's project officer found guilty of fraud, crime related to bribery, as well as involvement in a criminal organisation or any other illegal activities, which affected the European Union or the Republic of Latvia on financial interests;
7) is available to the applicant in the project, stable and sufficient financial and human resources, facilities, to ensure the continuity of the implementation of the project and the implementation of the prescribed time limit;
8) the project is not implemented or its implementation has been initiated from the other financial instruments of the European Union;
9) project or optional stalls were deserted before the real estate project implementation are not bought with the financial support of the European Union;
10 the applicant) is responsible for the conduct of the procurement procedure and documentation;
11) project, the applicant for at least eight years after the project is completed in all the Fund kept the project implementation documentation and information and, if necessary, it will show, as well as agree to Latvia or the representatives of the bodies of the European Union controls and audits before approving a project, the project during implementation and after completion of the project;
12) project the applicant certifies that the public will be informed of the Fund's contribution to the implementation of the project will be met, as well as publicity and visual identity guidelines.
If it is found that the project applicant knowingly or recklessly made false statements, the managing authority will deny access to the Fund and will be able to turn to law enforcement bodies.
The head of the institution (name) (signature) (date) Note. The document properties in the "signature" and "date" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Minister of the Interior, the Minister of health ad interim l. Mūrniec annex 3 Cabinet 2010 UR.gada13.apr terms of īļ No 348 partner certificate (if the project involves the building of partnership) partner certifies that: 1) in the implementation of the project will not be tolerated discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation or age, and will be provided equal opportunities for different groups in society;
2) before the application of the project managing body or delegated authority partner is familiar with the content of the application for the project and their role in the implementation of the project;
3) partner empowered project applicant to conclude a grant agreement with the managing authority and to represent it in all with the introduction of the project-related activities;
4) partner for at least eight years after the completion of the project in all project implementation stored in associated documentation and information and, if necessary, it will show, as well as agree to Latvia or the representatives of the bodies of the European Union controls and audits before approving a project, the project during implementation and after completion of the project;
5) project or optional stalls were deserted before the real estate project implementation are not bought with the financial support of the European Union.
Partner institution (name) (signature) (date) Note. The document properties in the "signature" and "date" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Minister of the Interior, the Minister of health ad interim l. Mūrniec 4. Annex Cabinet 2010 April 13, Regulation No 348 excess procurement (subcontracting) total justification for asking the applicant to justify the project, 1. Why the intended procurement (subcontracting) percentage of eligible direct costs exceed the maximum (40%) why did the beneficiary the same it is not possible to perform a particular action (enact measures) 3. Why need to make purchases and to conclude a subcontract directly to the head of the institution (the word first name, last name) (signature) (date) Note. The document properties in the "signature" and "date" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Minister of the Interior, the Minister of health ad interim Mūrniec of annex 5 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010. the Regulation No. 348 co-financing statement declares that (project applicant or partner name) will provide a project (project name) co-financing LVL _____ ___ if the project application will be approved.
The head of the institution (name) (signature) (date) Note. The document properties in the "signature" and "date" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
Minister of the Interior, the Minister of health ad interim Mūrniec of annex 6 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010. the Regulation No. 348

Tender project submission evaluation criteria the criteria I. No PO box
Criterion rating (Yes, no, NA) formal project application 1 eligibility 1.1.
The project applicant is a direct or of the Republic of Latvia of direct public administration, derived public persona, other public authority, private-law legal person or representative of an international organisation in the Republic of Latvia, which operates the Fund area 1.2.
The project applicant is solvent, including not on the reorganisation or winding-up proceedings in 1.3.
The project applicant is not a tax debt of 1.4.
Filed the original application of the project 5.
Filed the requested number of copies of the application project * 1.6.
Copies of the application, the project comply with the project's original application for 1.7.
The project application is filed in electronic form * 1.8.
Electronic version of the application, the project meets the project's original application, excluding the additional supporting documents (if applicable) 1.
Project submission has been prepared according to the project application form (fill project and are included in the project application of all applicable sections) 1.10.
The project application has been signed by the responsible 1.11.
Draft statement by the applicant corresponds to the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010 No. 348 "provisions of the General Programme" solidarity and management of migration flows "within the European external borders Fund, the European return Fund and the European Refugee Fund project selection and the technical assistance for the implementation of the activity" (hereinafter rules) Annex 2, and it is signed by a responsible officer of 1.12.
The project application is accompanied by all the relevant accompanying documents 1.13.
The project application and additional supporting documents submitted are numbered 2. application of the project's financial eligibility 2.1.
Project financial calculations are performed in LVL 2.2.
The requested Fund, the State budget and co-financing the project co-financing by the applicant is calculated the arithmetic correctly, respecting the legal status of the applicant, the project and the funding ratio of 2.3.
The project budget is balanced (total eligible cost is equal to the total of income) 2.4.
Requested from the Fund shall not exceed the relevant program activity financial resources available in 2.5.
The project's budgeted costs comply with the provisions of section V of annex 1 of the "project budget estimate" 2.6.
Project indirect eligible costs does not exceed 20% (European return Fund and the European Refugee Fund) or 5% (the European external borders Fund) of the total direct eligible project costs. If the project procurement (subcontractors) amount is greater than 40% of the direct eligible costs of the project the indirect eligible costs ratio does not exceed 10% of the total direct eligible project costs (the European return Fund and the European Refugee Fund). If the purchase of the project (subcontracting) cost, equipment cost, and real estate cost a total of more than 40% of the direct eligible costs of the project the indirect eligible costs ratio does not exceed 2.5% of the total direct eligible project costs (external borders Fund) 2.7.
If the application of the project planned purchases of more than 40% of the total direct eligible project costs is presented in annex 4, the provisions of the appropriate grounds for 2.8.
The project specified in the application shall not exceed the time limit for the annual programs Fund implementation period (N + 2 30 June) 2.9.
The project submission complies with the relevant interventions of the Fund action area 3. formal partners in compliance (if applicable) 3.1.
Cooperation partner of the Republic of Latvia or of Member States of the European Union direct or direct public administration, derived public persona, other public authority, private-law legal person or representative of an international organisation in the Republic of Latvia, which operates the Fund area 3.2.
Partner is solvent, including not on the reorganisation or winding-up proceedings in 3.3.
Partner is not a tax debt of 3.4.
Proof of business partners comply with the provisions of annex 3, and it is signed by a responsible officer of the note. * Does not apply to those submissions that are submitted electronically.
II. Quality criteria no PO box
 Criteria for the assessment of conformity of the draft 1 15% 1.1.
The project is focused on the application of certain of the Fund of the general objective and specific objectives of the 0-5 1.2.
The project submission complies with the requirements of the Fund in the relevant activity and the priorities supported activity 0-5 1.3.
Project submissions are clearly indicated in compliance with national (Republic of Latvia) policy planning documents of border and migration management 1.4 0-5.
Project submissions are clearly indicated in the compliance with international (European Union) policy planning documents on border and migration flow management 0-5 2. Rationale of the project 25% 2.1.
The project is clearly defined in the application of the General purpose of the project and the project specific objective 2.2 0-5.
Project submissions is provided in the description of the problem, a clearly defined situation and the relevance of the selected targeting 0-5 2.3.
The project offered a solution to the problem in the application efficiency 0-5 2.4.
The project's activities are clearly defined in the 0-2.5 5.
Application of the project results and the indicators are well defined, consistent with the purpose and are measurable 0-5 2.6.
The project is clearly defined in the application potential of the project risks and conditions 0-5 2.7.
Application of the project clearly demonstrates the linkage between project, identify the problem, define the objectives, planned activities and results 0-5 2.8.
The results of the project are sustainable (project application clearly states how the project results will be used after the completion of the implementation of the project) project 0-5 3 Introduction 3.1 15% capacity.
Project submissions are clearly displayed in administering the staff competence, experience and professional qualifications of the 0-5 3.2.
Application of the project clearly demonstrates the project implementation monitoring mechanism 0-5 3.3.

Application of the project clearly demonstrates the degree of readiness of the project and the necessary material and technical base of 0-5 3.4.
The project included in the application are commensurate with the planned implementation timetable 0-5 3.5.
The project specified in the application and dissemination of publicity measures are appropriate publicity and visual identity guidelines, 0-4.5, project budget, cost justification and effectiveness 25% 4.1.
The project budget is clearly divided along the lines of track 0-5 and 4.2.
The project's budgeted costs for the implementation of the project is proportionate and appropriate to the current market price of 0-5 4.3.
Leverage utility (value for money) to achieve 0-5 the maximum number of points 100 III. Specific criteria – 20% no PO box
Evaluation criteria 1.
The implementation of the project will solve the current problems of the border or migration flows management 0-5 2.
The project does not overlap with other projects of similar nature 0-5 3.
The project involves the transfer of best practices or new approaches to the use of the border or the management of migratory flows 0-5 the maximum number of points 15 note. For each criterion a certain number of points from 1 to 5 according to the following ratings: 0-does not meet criteria;
1-very low;
2-low;
3-partial compliance;
4-almost complete;
5-full compliance. 
IV. Quality criteria and specific criteria for the calculation of the total number of points no PO box
Criterion the maximum score in the rating Section of the estimate of the proportion (%)
Overall rating: (A) (B) (C) (D) = (A) (B) (C) (D) x 1.20 15 2 compliance Project. Project justification project implementation 25 25 3 capacity 25 15 4. Project budget, cost justification and effectiveness. specific criteria 20 25 5 25 20 total 115 100 Interior Minister, Health Minister ad interim Mūrniec of annex 7 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010. the Regulation No. 348 limited selection project submission evaluation criteria the criteria I. No PO box
Criterion rating (Yes, no, NA) formal project application 1 eligibility 1.1.
Filed in the original submission of the project 1.2.
Filed the requested a copy of the application the project number 1.3.
Copies of the application, the project comply with the project's original application for 1.4.
The project application is filed in electronic form * 1.5.
Project submission in electronic form matches your project's application for the original 1.6.
Project submission has been prepared according to the project application form (fill project and are included in the project application of all applicable sections) 1.7.
The project application has been signed by the responsible 1.8.
Draft statement by the applicant corresponds to the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010 No. 348 "provisions of the General Programme" solidarity and management of migration flows "within the European external borders Fund, the European return Fund and the European Refugee Fund project selection and the technical assistance for the implementation of the activity" (hereinafter rules) Annex 2, and it is signed by a responsible officer of 1.9.
The project application is accompanied by all the relevant accompanying documents 1.10.
The project application and additional supporting documents submitted are numbered 2. application of the project's financial eligibility 2.1.
Project financial calculations are performed in LVL 2.2.
The requested Fund, the State budget and co-financing the project co-financing by the applicant is calculated the arithmetic correctly, respecting the legal status of the applicant, the project and the funding ratio of 2.3.
The project budget is balanced (total eligible cost is equal to the total of income) 2.4.
Requested from the Fund shall not exceed the relevant program activity financial resources available in 2.5.
The project's budgeted costs comply with the European Commission decision on the implementation of the Fund established for the classification of eligible cost 2.6.
Project indirect eligible costs does not exceed 20% (European return Fund and the European Refugee Fund) or 5% (the European external borders Fund) of the total direct eligible project costs. If the project procurement (subcontractors) amount is greater than 40% of the direct eligible costs of the project the indirect eligible costs ratio does not exceed 10% of the total direct eligible project costs (the European return Fund and the European Refugee Fund). If the purchase of the project (subcontracting) cost, equipment cost, and real estate cost a total of more than 40% of the direct eligible costs of the project the indirect eligible costs ratio does not exceed 2.5% of the total direct eligible project costs (external borders Fund) 2.7.
If the application of the project planned purchases of more than 40% of the total direct eligible project costs is presented in annex 4, the provisions of the appropriate grounds for 2.8.
The project specified in the application shall not exceed the time limit for the annual programs Fund implementation period (N + 2 30 June) 2.9.
The project submission complies with the relevant interventions of the Fund action area 3. formal partners in compliance (if applicable) 3.1.
Cooperation partner of the Republic of Latvia or of Member States of the European Union direct or direct public administration, derived public persona, other public authority, private-law legal person or representative of an international organisation in the Republic of Latvia, which operates the Fund area 3.2.
Partner is solvent, including not on the reorganisation or winding-up proceedings in 3.3.
Partner is not a tax debt of 3.4.
Proof of business partners comply with the provisions of annex 3, and it is signed by a responsible officer of the note. * Does not apply to those submissions that are submitted electronically.
II. Quality criteria no PO box
Criteria for the assessment of compliance of the project 1.1 1.
Project submissions are clearly indicated in compliance with national (Republic of Latvia) policy planning documents on border and migration flow management 1.2 0-5.

Project submissions are clearly indicated in the compliance with international (European Union) policy planning documents on border and migration flow management 0-5 2. Rationale of the project 2.1.
The project is clearly defined in the application of the General purpose of the project and the project specific objective 2.2 0-5.
Project submissions is provided in the description of the problem, a clearly defined situation and the relevance of the selected targeting 0-5 2.3.
The project offered a solution to the problem in the application efficiency 0-5 2.4.
The project's activities are clearly defined in the 0-2.5 5.
Application of the project results and the indicators are well defined, consistent with the purpose and are measurable 0-5 2.6.
The project is clearly defined in the application potential of the project risks and conditions 0-5 2.7.
Application of the project clearly demonstrates the linkage between project, identify the problem, define the objectives, planned activities and results 0-5 2.8.
The results of the project are sustainable (project application clearly states how the project results will be used after the completion of the implementation of the project) project 0-5 3 implementation capacity 3.1.
Project submissions are clearly displayed in administering the staff competence, experience and professional qualifications of the 0-5 3.2.
Application of the project clearly demonstrates the project implementation monitoring mechanism 0-5 3.3.
Application of the project clearly demonstrates the degree of readiness of the project and the necessary material and technical base of 0-5 3.4.
The project included in the application are commensurate with the planned implementation timetable 0-5 3.5.
The project specified in the application and dissemination of publicity measures are appropriate publicity and visual identity guidelines, 0-4.5, project budget, cost justification and effectiveness 4.1.
The project budget is clearly divided along the lines of track 0-5 and 4.2.
The project's budgeted costs for the implementation of the project is proportionate and appropriate to the current market price of 0-5 4.3.
Leverage utility (value for money) to achieve 0-5 maximum score 90 note. Each quality criterion a certain number of points from 1 to 5 according to the following ratings: 0-does not meet criteria;
1-very low;
2-low;
3-partial compliance;
4-almost complete;
5-full compliance. 
Minister of the Interior, the Minister of health ad interim Mūrniec of L.