Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 364 Riga 2010 April 13 (Mon. No 19 35) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers on 15 September 2009. Regulations No. 1059 "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.4.1.2. Appendix activity" infrastructure "Natura 2000 territories" issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do Cabinet of 15 September 2009. Regulations No. 1059 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "activity" Supplement 3.4.1.2. Infrastructure areas "Natura 2000" (Latvian journal 2009, no. 149) the following amendments: 1. Replace rule name "." with the number "3.4.1.2 3.5.1.3.".
2. Express 1.1. subparagraph by the following: "1.1. the procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.5. priorities" environmental infrastructure and environmental friendly energy contributes "UR3.5.1.pas" environmental infrastructure "3.5.1.3. activity" infrastructure Natura 2000 sites ' (hereinafter referred to as the activity); ".
3. Replace the words "in paragraph 1.2 of the European regional development fund ' with the words ' cohesion fund '.
4. paragraph 3 shall be expressed by the following: "3. the activities to be implemented under project 100% financed by the Cohesion Fund. The activity of the Cohesion Fund financing available is 4 568 226 lats. "
5. Make paragraph 5 by the following: "5. the competent authority is the Ministry of the environment. Ministry of the environment in accordance with European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management law provides all its functions, including appropriate competence shall ensure that these rules are not exceeded the prescribed activities available for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund funding, and monitor the available funding under the Cohesion Fund, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level, controlling the project financial plan. "
6. Express 8.7. subparagraph by the following: "8.7. publicity expenses, if the relevant public services do not exceed minimum requirements set by the 8 December 2006 by Commission Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund , article 8; ".
7. Supplement with 8.8. subparagraph by the following: "8.8. value added tax costs, if they have not recovered from the State budget."
8. To supplement the provisions under point 8.1 as follows: "project preparation costs 8.1, autoruzraudzīb and building costs, as well as publicity costs of measures (this rule 8.1., 8.2, 8.4., 8.5., 8.6 and 8.7.) are eligible if they are justified by a service or works contract (case joint construction and design agreement)."
9. Replace paragraph 9, first sentence, the words "of the project's overall" with the words "and the number of the rule referred to in paragraph 8.3.".
10. Make the following paragraph 13: "13. project application selection issued in two project application selection rounds: 13.1. first project application selection available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is LVL 2 687 207;
13.2. the second project application selection available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is LVL 1 881 019;
13.3. If the first application round of projects available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is not granted or used, it directs the second project application selection round of financing;
13.4. If the second application round of projects available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is used up, the responsible authority may decide on additional project application selection round of organizing. "
11. Delete paragraph 16.
12. To express 17 as follows: "17. number of projects project application to the applicant, the Cohesion Fund funding and activities, and the corresponding application project in the framework of the selection round is not limited."
13. Replace the 18 numbers and the words "28., 29, 30 and 31., 32, 33. or 34, 35, 36" with numbers and words "26, 27, 28 and 29, 30, 31 or 32, 33, 34."
14. Replace paragraph 19 in the number and the word "38." with a number and the word "36".
15. Replace paragraph 20, the words "the European regional development fund ' with the words ' cohesion fund '.
16. Replace paragraph 25.1. numbers and the words "26, 27, 29 and 30" with numbers and the words "24, 25, 27 and 28."
17. Replace 25.2 in numbers and the words "8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 28, 31, 34, 35, 36 and 37" with numbers and words "8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 26, 29, 32, 33, 34 and 35 points.
18. Replace 25.3 in numbers and the words "12, 13, 16, 20, 21, 22, 32, 33 and 38, paragraph" with the figures and the words "12, 14, 18, 19, 20, 30, 31 and 36".
19. Replace the in number and 28.2 word "in paragraph 38" with a number and the word "36".
20. Replace paragraph 28.3. numbers and the words "in paragraph 32 and 33" with numbers and the words "in paragraphs 30 and 31".
21. Replace the in number and 28.5 word "16" with a number and the word "14".
22. Replace 28.6. number and in paragraph 20, the word "the" with the number and the word "18".
23. Replace 28.7. number and in paragraph 21, the word "the" with the number and the word "19.".
24. Replace the paragraph number and 17.9. the word "22" with a number and the word "20".
25. replace paragraph 33, the words "the European regional development fund ' with the words ' cohesion fund '.
26. To complement the provisions of the following paragraph 40: "40. agreement on the responsible authority first application round project projects switch after a decision on project approval and project submissions, the applicant clarified the application of the project according to the rules laid down in annex 2 of the cohesion fund the project submission form."
27. Express the new annex (annex 1).
28. Make the new version of annex 3 (annex 2).
Prime Minister Dombrovskis v. Minister of environment, regional development and local Government Minister ad interim r. vējonis Environment Ministry submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers 2010 April 13, Regulation No 364 "annex 2 Cabinet of 15 September 2009. Regulations No 1059 project submission form to the Minister of the environment, regional development and local Government Minister ad interim r. vējonis annex 2 Cabinet 2010 April 13, Regulation No 364" annex 3 Cabinet of 15 September 2009. Regulations No 1059 cohesion fund project application evaluation form BC Assessment Criteria 1. quality criteria for rating points 1. planned activities the project ready to launch at least 2 points 1.1., the project is ready to start (a list of the works to be carried out is not prepared or not prepared qualitatively) 0 1.2. project readiness is low to start (is prepared and based on the list of the works to be carried out, the purchase documentation not prepared) 1 1.3. project is the launch of the medium are readiness (ready and reasonable list of works to be up the purchase documentation projects development) 2 1.4. project has high readiness for initiation (developed the technical design of the works, prepared for the technical specifications of the procurement) 3 2. Project risk assessment, including assessing the potential increase in costs must be obtained at least 2 points 2.1. project application is not made in the risk assessment in the application of the project 2.2 0 risk assessment has been carried out, the plan of measures to prevent the risk identified is not developed or not developed completely 1 2.3. application is made in the project quality risk assessment , the action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete submission of project 2.4 2 has made a qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 3. sustainable use to be infrastructure evaluation to be obtained at least 2 points 3.1. no assessment on the planned lifetime of 0 3.2. infrastructure be planned lifetime is less than 5 years 1 3.3. infrastructure be planned lifetime of 5 to 10 years 2 3.4 infrastructure be planned service life exceeds 10 years. the project promotes 3 4 tourism development in a Natura 2000 area criterion gives additional points 4.1 offer tourists remain the current amount 0 4.2. Natura 2000 sites is available to the tourists-tourists the offer is extended 5 4.3. Natura 2000 sites has not been available to tourists – creates new offers tourists 10 5. cost assessment index of return (infrastructure planned lifetime (years) relative to the initial project total costs)

(Note. The average project application selection round of cost indicators of return calculates the project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria – cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions) criterion gives additional points 5.1. project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent of the project costs 1 5.2. indicators of return is equal to the average of the project application selection round costs of return indicators , by 10 percent to exceed or are less than 10 per cent of the project costs 2 5.3 indicators of return is greater than the average of the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent of the 3 criteria 1.1 horizontal priorities 6. Anthropogenic load declining infrastructure (sustainable development) should be obtained at least 1 point in rating the sum, complex projects receiving higher ratings for erosion reduction 6.1 (fencing hillsides anchorages, well, ladders) area 1 6.2. for reducing pollution in the eitrof (waste, lavatories, resting place fitting) 1 6.3 intended visitors flow management, to preserve the natural values and routed visitors to less sensitive sites (informative signs, indications, trails, footbridges, enclosure) 1 6.4. for areas accessible (pievedceļš road parking areas for parking lot) 1 7. provides for specific activities the principle of equal opportunities for , particularly by improving access to information for persons with functional disabilities (equal opportunity) gives additional points 7.1. project does not foresee specific activities to ensure access to information for persons with functional disabilities 0 7.2. project specific activities intended to ensure access to information for persons with functional disabilities 3 2. eligibility criteria Yes/No 2.1. project eligibility criteria 8. for each Natura 2000 site, for the application of the draft , has developed a conservation plan and project activities in the application meet the nature protection plan (sustainable development) N 9. Natura 2000 site, for the application of the project, include intense group of sites visited by tourist development potential according to the regulations on the implementation of the activity of N 10. Project application meets the objective of the activity of the project submission 11 N corresponds to activities eligible activities N 12. Project application corresponds to the activity of the eligible costs of the project application, P 13. project description provide necessary information on the action N provided to 13.1. technical characteristics of activities specified in the result of 13.2 and outcome indicators, and they meet the purpose of the activity 13.3. actions to be taken given the positioning of the project area indicated actions to 13.4. qualitative and quantitative investment in nature protection plan 14. timetable of the project comply with the planned project activities P 15. project information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant, the sustainability of the project results is appropriate N 15.1. institutional structure is appropriate for a planned 15.2. results of the project built in the maintenance costs of the infrastructure 15.3. is or will be available for staff to keep the project as a result of the implementation of the infrastructure project submission 16 project actual specified indicators (including landmarks, information stands, indications, trails, footbridges, fencing, hillsides anchorages, guest posts) corresponds to the description of the project N 17. Project budget includes costs 17.1. project N includes all costs necessary for the implementation of the positions meet the projected 17.2. market prices is proportionate and reasonable 17.3., indicate clearly the assumptions for the calculation of the costs directly necessary 17.4. project 18. project cash flow forecast P 18.1 displays both funding request and cost forecast 18.2. meet the planned time schedule 18.3. consistent with the financial plan of the project 19. project planned in the application project implementation and human resources ensure planned legislation in certain beneficiary functions P 19.1. Project administrative (including procurement, contract administration, record keeping) control project financial 19.2 (including accounting, verification and payment, financial planning) management of technical projects (19.3 including reconciliation of design and construction in progress work progress reports, and report preparation) control project planned 20. publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the regulations on the funds of the European Union funded project publicity and information dissemination measures P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No applicant-21 Project public authorities – is the project affecting the specially protected natural areas protection and management N 22. Project applicant has stated that it is the landowner's written consent for the deployment of the infrastructure Project, the applicant 23 N has stated that would result in the implementation of the project infrastructure will be the property of the applicant of the project after the implementation of the project in accordance with the conditions of the activity N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 24. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 25. Project applicant is invited to submit a project application to the N 26. project submissions prepared according to activity submission form for the submission of draft N 27. Latvian language ready N 28. submission of the project drawn up into N 29. Project submission signed by the authorised person N (NA) 30. Filed one project application, original and three copies, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) And project submissions 31. original and copy of the caurauklot submitted, attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) 32. project application and attachments are presented according to the electronic movement of documents regulatory requirements in laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 33. project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA)
34. the project submission and attachments designed for DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 35. project application form completed in all its sections N 36. the project attached to the application, all listed in annex P. Environment monitoring of 36.1 National Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of 36.2. project cartographic material that shows the position of project activities the project territory 36.3. the project cash flow forecast for the legend: N-if the assessment is negative, the project application is rejected, the P-a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision), NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. "
The Minister of the environment, regional development and local Government Minister ad interim r. vējonis