Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 363, Riga, 13 April 2010 (pr. No 19 34) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 March 2008. Regulations No. 212 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "3.3.1.1. activity" Supplement to the TEN-T road network improvements "issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 25 March 2008. Regulations No. 212" rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" 3.3.1.1. activity "Supplement to the TEN-T road network improvements" (Latvian journal in 2008, 54 no; 2009, 35, 83 no) the following amendments: 1. To complement the chapter II by 6.1 points as follows: "the second project application 6.1 selection round a minimum cohesion fund co-financing per project from the project total eligible costs is 1 000 000 lats."
2. the title of chapter IV, Expressed as follows: "(IV). The Cohesion Fund project supported activities and eligible costs".
3. Delete paragraph 14, the word "relevant".
4. Make a point 15 as follows: "15. If the project total cost: 15.1. at least 35 140 200 lats, the project applicant project application prepares the Latvian language (annex 1) and English according to the Commission of 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, the annex XXI;
15.2. are smaller than 35 140 200 lats, the project applicant project application prepares the Latvian language according to the project application form (annex 2). "
5. Delete paragraph 16.
6. To express 17 as follows: "17. Project applicant project application to prepare the text, subject to the regulations laid down in document preparation and design requirements."
7. Make the paragraph 19 by the following: "19. activities within the responsible authority organises a number of project application selection round. The next application round project tool for all activities within the remaining funds, if the previous selection round is not learned all the activity within the funds available. "
8. Express 22 the following: "22. evaluation shall include the Commission responsible authorities and representatives of the Ministry of transport. The representatives of the managing authority is the power to participate in the meetings of the Commission as observers without voting rights. "
9. Supplement with 24.1 points as follows: "the second project application 24.1 selection round a draft submitted in the framework of the application of the conformity is valued on the basis of those provisions set out in annex 3 of the draft application evaluation criteria. The project's compliance with this provision the application to annex 3 1, 2 and 4 under the assessment criteria laid down scored with "Yes" () or "no" (no matches). The project's compliance with this provision the application to annex 3 section 3 set out the assessment criteria assessed by the granting of certain number of points. "
10. Supplement with 28.1 points as follows: "the responsible authority 28.1 second application round of projects within the framework of the project application is approved if it meets all the rules referred to in annex 3 of the assessment criteria. The project's responsible authority approves the application, if the application does not need to specify the appropriate one of these rule 3. Title 1 and 2, the assessment criteria listed in, which allows the application of the project approval with conditions. In other cases, if you received a negative assessment, the responsible authority shall take a decision to reject the application for the project. "
11. Delete the second sentence of paragraph 33.
12. To supplement the provisions of Chapter VII, the following wording: "(VII). final question 36. This rule 6, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 31 apply first application round of projects approved in the project submissions."
13. Replace the names and numbers in the annex ' annex to the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 March 2008. Regulations No 212 '' with numbers and the words ' Annex 1 ' Cabinet of 25 March 2008. Regulations No 212. ''
14. To supplement the provisions of annex 2 with the following (annex 1).
15. To supplement the provisions of annex 3 with the following (annex 2).
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky traffic Minister k. Gerhards traffic Ministry submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 13 April 2010 regulations no 363 "annex 2 Cabinet of 25 March 2008. Regulations No 212 traffic Minister k. Gerhard annex 2 Cabinet 2010 April 13, Regulation No 363" annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 March 2008. Regulations No 212 Project submission evaluation criteria 1. Administrative criteria evaluation system Criteria the impact on decision making (P * N **) Yes/No 1.1.
The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 1.2.
The project applicant is invited to submit a project application N 1.3.
The project has been prepared for submission into P 1.4.
Project submission is prepared in Latvian language N 1.5.
One project has been submitted to the original application and one copy (if the application is not filed in electronic form of a document) N 1.6.
The project submission complies with the regulations laid down in the document preparation and design requirements P 1.7.
The project application has been drawn up according to the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activities specified in the project application form N 1.8.
The project application is fully completed and is attached to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activities set out in annex P 1.9.
Application of the project financing plan is no arithmetic errors and correctly completed P 1.10.
The project application is signed by the project paraksttiesīg of the applicant party or its authorized person (is connected to the power card) N 1.11.
The project's eligible cost specified in the application to the positions correspond to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activities set out the eligible costs and the amount of P 1.12.
The required co-financing from the Cohesion Fund and the national fund size is calculated the arithmetic properly P 1.13.
Required for the project under the Cohesion Fund co-financing shall not exceed the proportion of the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity stated maximum amount P 2. eligibility criteria evaluation system be rejected or Yes/No to be 2.1.
The project complies with the regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity specified in the activity purpose N 2.2.
Project management staff have appropriate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical knowledge. Project application describes the project management, implementation and monitoring of the scheme, and it required resources (in the number of staff involved, qualifications and responsibilities, the available material and technical base) N 2.3.
The project has made a cost-benefit analysis N 2.4.
Project cost-benefit analysis is used in real financial discount rate of five percent, and the social discount rate – 5.5 percent N 2.5.
The project's economic net present value (ENPV) is greater than zero N 2.6.
The project's economic rate of return (ERR) is more than 5.5 percent N 2.7.
The project is carried out sensitivity and risk analysis N 2.8.
The project will be completed by 31 august 2015 N 2.9.
The project has developed the technical design N 2.10.
The project is designed for the stage road, which is located in the TEN-T road network N 2.11.
The minimum project total eligible costs are at least 1 000 000 lats (EUR 1 422 872) N 2.12.
The project budget includes expenditure corresponds to the average of the market prices and construction are required to achieve the project's results and the implementation of planned activities P 2.13.
If the project will be implemented, the project will be included in the maximum period of road vehicle driving axle load 11.5 tonnes and maximum uncontrolled vehicle weighing 44 tons N 2.14.
The project contained in the country's main highway pavement condition of the period to the date of submission of the project is assessed with a '' satisfactory ", '' bad '' or '' very bad", through the national joint stock company "Latvian state roads" quality control procedure '' Paved a blanket inspection "N 2.15.
The project planned publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the requirements of P 2.16.
The project planned in the application monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable N 2.17.
The project is not and has not been financed or co-financed from other Union financial sources as well as State and local budgets, as well as project planned activities do not overlap with the activities financed by other structural funds of European Union activities and of other financial instruments within N 2.18.

Infrastructure, which involves making the investment, the project is located the property of the applicant or the applicant has entered into an agreement with the owner of the land under the building Act P 2.19.
Ensuring the sustainability of the project results – ensure object maintenance 20 years after completion of the project N 3. Criteria of quality evaluation system of notes points 3.1. economic rate of return of the project norm (ERR) points are awarded according to the ERR value 3.2.
Project implementation time 3.2.1.
to 1 year 3 3.2.2.
from 1 to 2 years 2 3.2.3.
more than 2 years 1 3.3.
Designing projects, will be taken into account in the construction of laws and regulations governing the requirements for accessibility for people with functional disabilities, and includes additional project-specific measures for promoting environmental accessibility for people with functional disabilities (such as terrain surface, contrasting colour at the level of the Exchange, traffic lights, guardrails, equipped with a sound signal, bus platform tilted uzbrauktuvj installation) 1 developing projects, will be taken into account in the construction of laws framework requirements but the project is not intended for specific measures for the promotion of accessibility for people with functional disabilities 0 3.4.
The project will prevent or reduce negative impacts on the quality of the environment 3.4.1.
exactly 2 3.4.2.
not exactly 1 3.4.3. let 0 4. Funding criteria ranking system yes/no notes 4.1.
If the application complies with this annex 1.1., 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.7, 1.10, 2.1., 2.2., 2.3., 2.4., 2.5., 2.6., 2.7., 2.8., 2.9, 2.10, 2.11, 2.13, 2.14, 2.16, 2.17 and 2.19. evaluation criteria laid down in point, 3.1., 3.2., 3.3 and 3.4. evaluation criteria specified in the received a total of at least seven points, then the project submissions, listing in descending order, starting with the most points winning the project application , project selection round application is sufficient funding for the project N notes.
1. If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition.
2. If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project. "
Traffic Minister k. Gerhard