Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 477 Riga, may 25, 2010 (pr. No 27 6. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix. "socio-economic activity in 3.4.3.2 important cultural heritage site restore" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.4. Qualitative environmental priorities "life and economic activity in the" UR3.4.3.pas "cultural based socio-economic impacts" socio-economic "activity 3.4.3.2. important cultural heritage site restore" (hereinafter activity);
1.2. The European regional development fund project application evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the European regional development fund project applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant);
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements;
1.5. the responsible bodies and authorities functional cooperation in the form of subordination.
2. The purpose of the activity is to restore the cultural heritage objects, to increase their economic and innovative, which can serve as an important factor in the economic recovery of the territory, to increase the attractiveness of the life, work and business-friendly conditions.
3. the implementation of the activity is detected in the project application selection. Open the project application selection organized by the responsible authority in one round for the entire activity of the financing available. If the project application deadlines are not learned all the funding available in the activity, the competent authority is entitled to organise the second round of the remaining funding. One project applicant is entitled to submit an unlimited number of project submissions.
4. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the European regional development fund. The overall activity within the available public funds shall not be less than 7 582 438 lats, of which the European regional development fund co-financing are 6 445 071 lats and national public co-financing is not less than 1 137 367 dollars, provided by the beneficiary.
5. activities available within the European regional development fund co-financing per project is up to 1 200 000 lats and not less than 250 000 lats. The European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed 85% of the project total eligible costs. Project co-financing from the applicant not less than 15% of the project total eligible costs.
6. the implementation of the activity provided by the responsible authority and the liaison body. The responsible authority is the Ministry of culture (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority), the authority is the Central Finance and Contracting Agency (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body).
7. the responsible authority shall: 7.1 ensure activity implementation, monitoring and control, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Council Regulation No 1083/2006), 1 and article 93, paragraph 2, of the enforcement activity of the principle level, including checks in the project locations;
7.2. ensure the project application selection and evaluation, including the development of the project application to the Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission) rules;
7.3. provide the Commission;
7.4. the development of the project application form filling methodology and provide information about the project applicant project application preparation;
7.5. prepare the object action strategy methodology;
7.6. the decision on the application of the project approval, the approval or rejection of a conditional and shall inform the applicant of the project (if the project is approved, the application shall also inform the liaison body);
7.7. to accumulate data for project submission and examination project locations, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use;
4.8. coordinate with the liaison body of the standard agreement for the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement);
7.9. the amendments to the agreement, if amendments affect project objectives, beneficiary changes, the deadlines for implementation of the project, which exceeds three months, the project funding if changes are made to more than 10% of project costs by funding source, or cost positions, as well as the expected results of the project, if the technical project design or technical changes in the approved version of the project is changed more than 10%;
7.10. analyse the activity implementation problems and make proposals to the managing authority for the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
7.11. provide the public with information and provides publicity related questions with the activity according to the legislation of the European Union funds a project disclosure, as well as ensure publicity and visual identity requirements.
8. cooperation authority: ensures activities 8.1. implementation, monitoring and control, including Council Regulation No 1083/2006 and article 93, paragraph 2, of the enforcement principle project level;
8.2. develop and coordinate it with the agreement of the competent authority;
8.3. the closing agreement with the European regional development fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary) on the implementation of the project;
8.4. the beneficiaries of project procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
8.5. provide information on the beneficiaries of the project and the terms of the agreement;
8.6. analyse implementation problems and make proposals to the managing authority for the improvement of the implementation of the project;
8.7. the checks submitted by the beneficiaries of the project progress reports and payment requests, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure, prepare payment orders and submit them to the payment institution, as well as the declarations of expenditure shall be prepared and sent to the certification authority;
8.8. assess project risks, plans to test the implementation of the project and take these checks;
8.9. to accumulate data about projects, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use;
8.10. the responsible authority shall cooperate with the public.
9. The Liaison Office has functional authority.
II. Requirements for the project the applicant 10. activities within the project application can be submitted to the national authority or authorities.
11. Infrastructure in which to invest the European regional development fund, the project is owned by the applicant or to the time limit of not less than five years after the completion of the project, if it is a national treasure.
12. If the applicant is a national or municipal museum, the project at the date of the application, it shall be accredited in accordance to the laws and regulations of the Museum in the field of accreditation.
13. in the framework of the activity shall not be eligible for funding: 13.1. If the applicant is a national project, revenue service administered by the tax debts;
13.2. If the applicant for the project provided by the managing authority, the responsible authority or the authority of false information or tried to influence the Commission, the responsible authority or the authority of this cooperation project submission, or other funds of the European Union co-financed projects in the evaluation of the application;
13.3. If the applicant has received project funding or funding provided for the same eligible costs of other activities in the framework of local, national or European Union budget funds.
III. eligible and ineligible activities, eligible and non-eligible costs 14. activities within the support only activities directly related to the project objectives and expected results, and are proportionate and reasonable.
15. funding is not granted to operations for which the beneficiary is paid before the conclusion of the agreement, with the exception of those provisions 18.1.1. cases referred to.
16. The project costs are planned, following the principle of sound financial management, consisting of: 16.1. the principle of economy, which related to resources that support the applicant uses their actions, would be available at a specific time, and the lowest price;
16.2. the principle of cost-effectiveness associated with the best relationship between resources employed and results;
16.3. the principle of effectiveness that is associated with the specific objectives set and achieving the intended results.
17. The project is not eligible for the subcontracting, which increases the cost of the project, but does not add the value to the project and the fee is fixed as a percentage of the total cost of the project.
18. The project has the following costs apply: 18.1. direct eligible costs:

18.1.1. project preparation costs (excluding the cost of filling out a form), incurred after May 1, 2008, to an amount not exceeding 10 per cent of the total direct eligible project costs, carried out pursuant to public procurement laws and regulatory requirements (except costs incurred, on the basis of employment contracts): a construction cost of preparing 18.1.1.1.;
18.1.1.2. engineering studies;
18.1.1.3. technical site survey costs;
18.1.1.4. heritage research costs;
18.1.1.5. heritage inventory cost;
18.1.2. construction supervisory costs (except costs incurred, on the basis of employment contracts): 18.1.2.1. building costs;
18.1.2.2. autoruzraudzīb costs;
18.1.2.3. archaeological supervision costs;
18.1.3. non-residential buildings and premises renovation, reconstruction, restoration and preservation costs, consistent with the laws and the construction of the cultural monuments protection law;
18.1.4. to restore cultural (architectural or urban monument historic building part) monument in adjacent territory improvement and landscaping costs (if the area is included in the cultural monument protection zone), in an amount not exceeding five percent of the total direct eligible project costs;
18.1.5. costs related to building commissioning, according to the regulations on the acceptance into service of the structure;
18.2. indirect eligible costs: 18.2.1. the project activities directly related to the publicity costs, which meets European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements;
18.2.2. the unexpected costs of the project, not exceeding five percent of the total direct eligible project costs (expenditure, if necessary, can be used with the implementation of the project related directly attributable costs);
18.3. the value added tax, directly linked to the project, co-financed the project applicant cannot recover it according to the tax laws governing.
19. in the framework of the activity is not relevant and not replaced in the application of the project costs: 19.1. costs in excess of the projected amount of the eligible cost;
19.2. costs not justified by relevant source documents;
19.3. the costs that do not comply with the principles of sound financial management;
19.4. interest payments on money transfers, Currency Exchange Commission payments and exchange rate fluctuations suffered damage;
19.5. customs duties and levies, value added tax, except that rule 18.3. cases referred to;
12.2. fines, penalties and expenses of litigation;
19.7. real estate purchase or rental costs;
19.8. the costs relating to lease transactions;
12.4. the costs associated with the supply of any services or work for which there is no appropriate procurement procedures carried out in accordance with the laws and regulations on the application of the procurement procedure or the closed contract contrary provisions;
19.10. accidents and resulting in the implementation of the project value insurance.
IV. submission of the project selection and project submission notification submission 20. Responsible Authority notice of project application submitted at least one month before the opening of the project application selection launch: 20.1. newspaper "Gazette";
20.2. the responsible authority's homepage on the internet (URwww.km.gov.lv).
21. in paragraph 20 of these regulations in this notice: 21.1. activities;
21.2. the project submission making a start and end date;
21.3. activities within the project available to the applicant the European regional development fund;
21.4. the purpose of the activity;
21.5. the project application submission procedures;
21.6. planned information measures;
21.7. the submission of the question;
21.8. the additional information is received.
22. To apply for funding of the project, the applicant shall submit to the responsible authority of the submission: 22.1. the project application form (annex 1);
22.2. the following additional documents: 22.2.1. the project Charter, a copy of the applicant (if applicable);
22.2.2. The State revenue service a certificate attesting that the applicant is not in the draft tax debt (a certificate issued no earlier than 30 calendar days prior to the application of the project), or the consent of the applicant a letter (the original of the letter is submitted separately, not attached to the application in the project), in which the project applicant authorizes the competent authority of the State revenue service to request a certificate (annex 2) that the applicant does not have tax debt (tax arrears);
22.2.3. būvvald the accept technical project the object copy (if applicable);
22.2.4. the būvvald accept the sketch project copy (if applicable);
22.2.5. būvvald issued by planning and architectural task copy (if applicable);
22.2.6. paraksttiesīg personal proof that up to the specified period of the authority responsible for the project, the applicant will submit the būvvald accept the technical project of the object copy (if applicable);
22.2.7. develop procurement documentation on project investments in infrastructure (if applicable);
22.2.8. According to the rules of procedure for the determination of būvizmaks developed the construction cost estimates, based on a copy of contracts with third parties, or the expected construction cost estimate (annex 3), specifying and separating all labour and materials cost positions that are included in the eligible costs of the project (if applicable);
22.2.9. draft decision of the applicant on the project and all project related to the implementation of legal commitments, indicating the total cost of the project application and source of pre-financing (if applicable);
22.2.10. environmental monitoring national Office a copy of the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure or a copy of the opinion on the environmental impact assessment final report (if applicable);
22.2.11. Municipal loan and guarantee control and monitoring Council decision or a copy of the certificate of the credit institution granting the credit (if applicable);
22.2.12. ownership of documents registered in the land register 22.2.12.1.: project supporting the applicant's ownership of the copy of the document about the infrastructure that carries out investment;
22.2.12.2. If the infrastructure that carries investments is State property, which is available in the applicant's possession or use for a period of not less than five years after the completion of the project, the land registry project established in the applicant's possession or the right to a copy of the identity document of the infrastructure that carries out investment;
22.2.13. operation strategy (according to the methodology of the authority responsible for the operation of the strategy).
23. the project applicant project application to the responsible authority may submit: 23.1. the paper form, by submitting the document personally to the responsible body or by sending by registered mail;
23.2. the electronic document in the form of submitting electronic media to the appropriate document to the responsible body by sending by registered mail or by sending to the authority electronic mail address.
24. If the project application submitted in the form of a paper document, it shall be submitted in triplicate (original and a copy of the identical electronic copy of the electronic medium) with indications, designed in accordance with the laws and regulations on document processing. Project applicant letter of agreement (if applicable) by caurauklot, not separate from the application of the project in accordance with Annex 2 of these rules.
25. If the application is sent by mail, at the time the project is considered the day when a project application is transferred to the post office. In the event of a dispute, the project applicant proves the fact that the consignment is placed in the mail. If the application is submitted in person, on the application of the project time is considered when a representative of the authority responsible has made the mark to the project application for receiving it.
26. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document in the form, sign it with a secure electronic signature, add time stamp and are presented according to the legislation on the circulation of electronic documents. About the project the application time is considered to be the moment when the project application sent by electronic mail. In the event of a dispute, the applicant demonstrates the fact that the application sent to the project submission deadline.
27. If the project application submitted personally or sent by registered mail shall be placed in an envelope or box, which indicates the following: 27.1. distribution: the Ministry of culture, k.Valdemara Iela 11, Riga, LV-1364;
27.2. the name of the activity;
27.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;
27.4. the name of the project;
27.5. "not to be opened before the start of the assessment".
28. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document by sending to the authorities responsible for electronic mail, electronic mail notice under "subject" indicates that provision, 27.4 and 27.5 27.2.. the information referred to in point.

29. the responsible authority shall record the receipt of project submissions a day. Proof of receipt of the application, the project authority in charge of the project to the applicant personally immediately or within five days after the application deadline by mail or electronically signed with a secure electronic signature according to the regulations on electronic document design.
V. Project submission evaluation and decision-making activities within the 30 project applications submitted to the evaluation provided by the Commission. Panelists included representatives from the responsible authority, the Ministry of culture and its subordinated institutions – national cultural monument protection Inspectorate. The Commission operates under regulations approved by the responsible authority.
31. Commission meetings as observers without the right to vote can participate in the managing authorities and the liaison body.
32. the project compliance with administrative applications, eligibility and funding criteria assessed with "Yes" or "no" – do not match. Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points.
33. If there is no information in the project application in order to assess compliance of the application for the project to one or more of the evaluation criteria, as well as if this information is not legible or not submitted to the Latvian language, believes that the project submission does not meet the relevant criteria for evaluation, or evaluation criteria in granting the lowest rating.
34. the criteria of evaluation order: 34.1. the Commission first assessed the compliance of the project application, this provision set out in annex 4. refine, not administrative criteria. If the application does not meet any of these criteria, the evaluation of the application, the project could not continue;
21.3. If the application complies with the provisions set out in annex 4, refine, not administrative criteria, project submissions valued under the provisions laid down in the annex not be eligibility criteria. If the application does not meet any of these criteria, the evaluation of the application, the project could not continue;
3. If the application complies with the provisions laid down in the annex not be eligibility criteria, project submissions valued under the provisions referred to in annex 4 of the quality criteria. If the application is one of the quality criteria of assessment they receive less than the minimum number of points, the project evaluation of the application do not continue;
21.4. If the project application to the quality criteria of assessment for each quality criterion has received the minimum number of points or more, project submissions valued under the provisions set out in annex 4, refine, compliance, administrative and funding criteria.
35. a decision on project approval of the application if the project is accepted, the application is received at least the minimum number of points for each quality criterion according to the provisions specified in annex 4, and evaluated with "Yes" for compliance with the eligibility, administration and funding criteria.
36. If multiple project submissions receive the same number of points, with priority given to the application of the project that received the greatest number of points in the annex 4 to these regulations 2 and 6 the quality criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If these criteria are equal, preference shall be given to the application of the project with a lower requested the European regional development fund.
37. The decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions which must be satisfied the project applicant to be able to conclude an agreement: 37.1. submit further clarification that does not change the substance of the application for the project;
23.1. to ensure compliance with the project application of these provisions to be laid down in the annex to the administrative criteria;
37.3. ensure compliance with the application of the draft provisions to be laid down in annex 4 eligibility criteria;
23.2. to clarify the application of the project, including the project for the construction of those submissions or project funding sources, financing of the project plan or a summary of the project budget, in the case of the arithmetic calculation errors;
37.5. specify operation strategy, insofar as this does not affect the operation of the strategy;
23.4. to clarify the commencement of project implementation time and time schedule or cost planning in the distribution over the years.
38. the decision on rejection of the application for the project is accepted, if the application does not meet the following criteria: 38.1. This provision is laid down in the annex not be administrative criteria;
38.2. the rules set out in annex 4, refine, not eligibility criteria;
38.3. in compliance with the quality assessment criteria for project submission even one quality criterion of assessment they receive less than the minimum number of points according to the rules of annex 4.
39. the decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection provided the responsible authority shall notify the applicant of the project within five working days after the decision.
40. If a decision on approval of the application, the project provided the conditions contained in the decision on the project, the applicant provides the responsible authorities within the time limits of no more than 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the decision.
41. the Commission within 30 calendar days of the evaluated projects information submitted by the applicant and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on its conformity with the decision approving the project application, provided the conditions laid down.
42. If the applicant does not comply with the draft decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions laid down or does not meet the deadline, the project application is considered to have been rejected.
43. Opinion on the decision the conditions contained in the responsible authority for the project the applicant sends two working days after the signing.
Vi. conditions for the implementation of the project 44. The project site is the territory of the Republic of Latvia.
45. the project activities referred to in the application, the beneficiary shall implement the 42 months of the conclusion of the cooperation agreement with the authority, but no later than 30 June 2015.
46. If the tender is not enacted before the cooperation agreement with the authority, the beneficiary of the first tender issued no later than three months after the conclusion of that agreement. If not the first tender issued within that period, the liaison body shall notify the competent authority. The responsible authority shall decide on the termination of the agreement.
47. after an agreement on the implementation of the project, the cooperation body, if it is available in the State budget, on the basis of the beneficiary's written request, the advance may be paid to the beneficiaries an advance payment of up to 20 percent of the European regional development fund, but not more than the amount that beneficiaries may request the cooperation of the authority within six months after an advance pursuant to laws and regulations on the procedures for in which the State budget expected to fund the European Union co-financed the project implementation, as well as make payments and preparation of declarations of expenditure.
48. cooperation authority comply with the terms of the advance and the total amount of interim payments shall not exceed 90 percent of the project to the European regional development fund co-financing.
49. The beneficiary may request an advance payment if the following conditions are met: 49.1. the beneficiary with the authority has entered into a cooperation agreement for the implementation of the project;
30.6. the beneficiary submits a collaborative institution purchase plan;
30.6. the initiation of implementation of the project is opened in a separate account in the State Treasury, which make and receive all the payments related to the implementation of the project.
50. The beneficiary shall submit a request for payment of the cooperation body, costs copies of supporting documents, project progress reports, and requests for amendments to the agreement according to the agreed conditions, deadlines, and procedures.
51. The beneficiary undertakes to provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project.
52. The beneficiary shall ensure that up-to-date information on the progress of the implementation of the project would be placed in the beneficiary's homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months.
53. The beneficiary is directly responsible for project implementation and maintenance of results for at least five years after the last payment is made.
Prime Minister-Minister for the environment r. vējonis cultural Minister i. Thaler Ministry of culture submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 May 2010 Regulation No. 477 of the cultural Minister i. Thaler annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 May 2010 Regulation No. 477 of the project applicant consent letter (statement claiming from the State revenue service) Culture Minister i. Thaler annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 May 2010 Regulation No. 477 of construction cost estimates sample estimates 1 local No. ____ ___ shipbuilding name object name
 

Address of the object the name of the compiled Work _ _ _ _ _ _ _ of market prices on the basis of the ___ ____ ____ ____ ____ part drawings no PO box
The working title of unit quantity unit cost total amount attributable to include all costs time norm category rate ($/HR) salary ($) materials (Ls) motor transport depreciation ($) total ($) not-close-sack time (c/st) salary ($) materials (Ls) motor vehicle depreciation ($) amount ($) total Transport costs in% of the cost of Direct materials costs total (t.sk. enterprise social duty 24.09%)















They constituted a certified civil engineer (signature) (name) certificate No ___ ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ made of _____. _____ _____ 2. a summary of the estimates of the object object name object address Them number local to them, the name of the cost estimates ($) including social tax (24.09%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Together-with associated costs (for virsizdevum ….%)-with planned savings (...%)
 
 
The eligible costs total construction cost estimate put the total of certified civil engineer (signature) (name) certificate No ___ ___ ___ ____ cultural Minister i. Thaler annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 May 2010 regulations No 477 Project submission evaluation criteria the criteria of quality evaluation system of project quality criteria point number 1. Construction Project readiness project, at the time of the application: the criteria to receive at least 1 paragraph 1.1. project application in building project approved būvvald attached to the technical design stage and construction cost estimate , has opened a procurement for project investments in infrastructure 5 1.2. submission of the project būvvald the approved construction plan attached to the technical design stage and construction cost estimate, prepared documentation for the procurement project investment in infrastructure laid down in 4 1.3. project application in building project approved būvvald attached to the technical design stage and construction cost estimate 3 1.4 project submission approved building project in būvvald added to the sketch stage of the project and the estimated construction cost estimate paraksttiesīg is proof that the person up to the responsible authorities the specified period will be presented in the approved construction plan of būvvald technical design stage 2 1.5. application connected to the project of būvvald approved planning and architectural task and the authorities responsible for the technical regulation issued in accordance with the laws and regulations in the field of construction, is paraksttiesīg proof that the person up to the responsible authorities the specified period will be presented in the approved construction plan of būvvald technical design stage 1 project application 1.6 is not added to the criteria documents required 0 2. as a result of the implementation of the project the project application and object of activity strategy : to receive at least Criteria 1 paragraph 2.1. cultural services to more than 90 000 visitors a year 6 2.2. cultural services from 70 001 to 90 000 (inclusive) visitors a year 3 2.3. cultural services from 50 001 to 70 000 (inclusive) visitors a year 2 2.4. cultural services from 20 000 (inclusive) to 50 (inclusive), 000 visitors a year 1 2.5. cultural services less than 20 000 visitors a year 0 3. Object operations strategy involves at least three of the following functions in the development of cultural industry to receive: the criteria at least 6 points 3.1. cultural heritage research, conservation and restoration services, thus providing the conditions for the conservation of the cultural heritage 2 3.2 new cultural industries research's launch in the direction of the regional or national level, in cooperation with educational institutions, including professional mentoring and training, the provision of lifelong learning, creative or research organisation and implementation of ' 2 3.3 information accumulation and dissemination of the culture and heritage sector 2 3.4. vocational arts , music distribution and availability, including international, national or regional festivals, symposia, workshops, seminars, creative, and organising events 2 4. risk assessment of project implementation (construction, supply, purchase and sales risks, potential cost incidence): Criteria to receive at least 1 paragraph 4.1. submission of project risk assessments has been made in a (construction, supply, purchase and sales risks, potential cost incidence), developed a plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risk 2 4.2. project risks identified in the submissions in part (construction may cost incidence), the action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete 1 4.3. project application is not made in the risk assessment 0 5. project application and operation strategy for publicity and information measures, which as a result of the implementation of the Criteria to receive: at least 1 paragraph 5.1. visibility of the object will be encouraged at international level 3 5.2. visibility of object will be encouraged at national level 2 will be 5.3 object recognition in the planning region level 1 5.4. project application object in the publicity and information measures 0 6.
As a result of the implementation of the project saved and restored cultural monument (the monument of urban architecture or historic building part): Criteria must receive at least 2 points 6.1. included in the UNESCO world cultural and natural heritage list or what is UNESCO world cultural and natural heritage list of the candidate, or who have been granted the European heritage label 4 6.2 which is a national monument of architecture or urban 2 6.3. have not been executed and 6.2 6.1 requirements set out in apakškritērij 0 7. project intended to implement : to receive at least Criteria 1 paragraph 7.1. up to 25 months 3 7.2 from 26 months to 30 months 2 7.3 from 31 to 42 months 1 month 7.4. more than 42 months 0 8. The project will maintain existing and create new jobs: the criteria to receive at least 1 paragraph 8.1 will be stored, the existing and created at least four new jobs 3 8.2. be saved existing jobs and create from one to three new jobs 2 8.3 will be stored, the existing. jobs, not creating new jobs 1 8.4. will not be saved in the existing and create new jobs for the horizontal Criterion 0 priority ranking system point scale 9. Cultural Monument location planning region development index project application deadlines: date of notification are not exclusive Criteria 9.1.-9.2.2.000 and below 5 to 1.000 – 1.999 – 4 9.3. from zero to-3 from 0.001 to 0.999 9.4 9.5 from 1 and 2 0.999 higher 1 10. applicant's Project funding eligible cost part of the project is more than a Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity required minimum co-financing: criteria not exclusive 10.1. more than 10 percent of the 3.6 to 10 percent, from 10.2 to 10.3 percent, up to 5.99 2 1 10.4. the applicant's funding projects eligible cost share projects no bigger than a Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity the minimum share of the co-financing of the project submission 11 0 for the specific activities the principle of equal opportunities for , particularly by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities: Criteria to receive at least 1 paragraph 11.1. three and more specific activities to ensure equal opportunities 2 11.2. one or two specific activities to ensure equal opportunities 1 No 11.3. specific activities to ensure equal opportunities 0 eligibility criteria evaluation system of project eligibility criteria yes/no or will be rejected ٭ 12. European regional development fund co-financing shall not exceed the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of specific activities for the maximum amount of co-financing P 13. The aim of the project activities meet the objective to restore the cultural heritage objects, to increase their economic and innovative, which can serve as an important factor in the economic recovery of the territory, to increase the attractiveness of the life, work and business-friendly conditions for the application of the project 14 N added force an object in steps strategy duration of at least five years after completion of the project N 15. as a result of the implementation of the project will update the national cultural monument (the monument of urban architecture or historic building) and saved the heritage value (authenticity) N 16.

The project has resulted in renewed national cultural monument is available to visitors at least 306 days a year P 17. submission of the project planned activities and expected results and indicators are defined, measurable, and focused on project objectives, performance indicators and the achievement of the target group's needs P 18. project displayed in the application identified the problem, objectives, activities and results of direct linking, the objectives of the projects selected for the optimal and most cost effective solution for P 19. Project application describes the project management implementation and monitoring of the scheme, and it required resources (for example, the number of personnel involved, qualifications and responsibilities, the available material and technical base), and they are appropriate to the needs of the project. the project application, P 20 included in the eligible costs and the amount corresponds to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activities set out the eligible costs and the amount of P 21. projected cost of the project is proportionate and reasonable in relation to anticipated results correspond to the real cost of the sector the date of the presentation of the Project the applicant 22 P will provide the necessary financial resources for the implementation of the project P 23. applicant Project is committed to providing financing from its own resources, if the cost of the project rose 24 P to application project is defined, how it will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the project for at least five years after completion of the project P 25. planned activities the project is not funded or co-financed by the and from State and local government funds and other Union financial sources as well as overlapping with activities that are funded other activities in European Union funds and the other financial instruments within the framework of the project N 26. publicity and information planned activities comply with the laws and regulations that govern the publicity and information measures the EU structural funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of the projects financed by the Project applicant P eligibility criteria ranking system Yes/No, or to be rejected by the Project applicant 27. ٭ is a public body or municipality N 28. Infrastructure , which make the European regional development fund contribution is: P 28.1. the property of the applicant for the project. the project the applicant's possession of 17.5 or usage, if it is a national treasure in 29 Projects applicant is not in the State revenue service administered by the tax debt P administrative criteria ranking system yes/no or will be rejected 30. ٭ project application has been submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the activities of the implementation deadline of the project submissions 31. N is made in the text (does not apply to project submissions submitted by electronic document in the form of project submissions 32.) N have been prepared in Latvian language N 33. Project applicant project application is filed in one of the following ways: N 33.1. by mail or in person in a sealed container (envelope or box), if the application is made in the paper or electronic document, electronic sign 33.2. with a secure electronic signature and add a time stamp, where the application is made in the electronic document in the form of project submissions, the original 34. is caurauklot (cauršūt) and application of the project pages are numbered (not applicable to the project application submitted in the form of electronic documents) P 35. project application submitted in two copies, one of which is orģināleksemplār, the other copy, and they have the appropriate references (does not apply to the project application submitted in the form of electronic documents) P 36. project submission copy matches the original project submission (does not apply to the project application submitted in the form of electronic documents) P 37. design application has been drawn up according to the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity of the P 38. project application is completely filled in, t.sk. application of the project includes all the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of activities in addition to the documents listed in the project application, P 39. has signed a paraksttiesīg person of the applicant under the draft laws regulating P 40. project financial calculations in the application is accurate and correct arithmetic developed P 41. submission of draft financial statement is made in the funding criteria P evaluation system yes/no reservation shall be rejected or 42.
If the application meets the 13, 14, 15, 25, 27, 30, 31, 32 and 33. evaluation criteria, as well as the evaluation criteria in 3 has received at least six points, 6. evaluation criteria in at least 2 points and 1., 2., 4., 5., 7., 8 and 11. evaluation criteria has received at least one point in each, then the project submissions, listing in order of priority, starting with the most points gained, the project submission has sufficient funds available in the activity P together If the application of the project 44 won less than 15 points , it is rejected.
Note the.
٭ Rejected if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected.
Reservation – if the rating is negative, can make a decision on project approval with conditions (project shall ensure compliance with the criteria laid down in the decision).
Culture Minister i. Thaler