Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 662, Riga, 20 July 2010 (pr. No 37 47) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix "liepājas 3.3.1.6. activity of Karosta premise of sustainable development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines the order in which the activities of the programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.3. priority "European transport network and the development of sustainable transport promotion" UR3.3.1.pas "contributes a large scale transport infrastructure improvement and development" activity "liepājas 3.3.1.6. Karosta premise of sustainable development" (hereinafter referred to as the activity) as well as project assessment criteria application, project requirements, the applicant and the responsible authority.
2. The purpose of the activity is sustainable management of coastal areas, providing a historically contaminated karosta canal restoration in accordance with the Baltic Sea action plan.
3. activities implemented in the framework of projects financed by the Cohesion Fund and the beneficiaries. Activities available within the Cohesion Fund co-financing are 11 069 163 lats, funding of the beneficiary is at least 1 953 381 lats.
4. the competent authority is the Ministry of the environment. The responsible authority should carry out its functions (including appropriate competency ensured that not been mentioned in these provisions for the implementation of the activities of the Cohesion Fund co-financing available) and monitor the Cohesion Fund co-financing available for learning, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level, controlling the project financial plan.
5. Activity implemented limited project application selection.
II. Project activities eligible, eligible and non-eligible costs of the activity within the 6 supported the reorganisation measures the port if the pollution with proper heavy metals and petroleum products exceed the environmental quality regulations for limit values.
7. eligible costs directly related to the project under the Cohesion Fund (hereinafter the project) within the operations carried out. Subject to the conditions contained in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, as well as the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1084/2006 establishing a Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94, the relevant costs are the following: 7.1. technical feasibility , the related escalation and with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, but not more than two per cent of the total estimated eligible project costs;
7.2. development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than four percent of the projected total project eligible costs. If you closed the combined design and construction contracts, the fixed costs of restrictions apply to the submission of the project estimated costs;
7.3. autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works covered by autoruzraudzīb. If you closed the combined design and works contracts, fixed payouts autoruzraudzīb restrictions apply to the submission of the project estimated costs;
7.4. building costs but no more than three percent of the eligible costs of the works covered by the Superintendence;
7.5. the cost of the works;
7.6. pēcsanācij monitoring installing necessary equipment supply contracts;
7.7. the reorganisation project implementation related infrastructure construction and the dismantling of existing structures, impeding the implementation of the project;
7.8. the publicity expenses, if the services in question do not exceed minimum requirements set by the Commission on 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund , article 8;
7.9. the value added tax costs, if they have not recovered from the State budget.
8. This rule 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4 and 7.8 in such costs are eligible if they are justified by a service or works contract (case joint construction and design Treaty), except for the costs incurred on a contract basis.
9. Non-eligible costs include the following: 9.1. costs that exceed this provision set out in section 7 of the eligible cost;
9.2. This provision is laid down in section 7 costs if the project application is the date of the signed release and acceptance;
9.3. the publicity costs if they exceed the minimum requirements set by the 8 December 2006 by Commission Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund , article 8;
9.4 value added tax costs if they are recovered from the State budget;
9.5. the costs relating to the prevention of pollution for which it is possible to determine its creator. 
10. the project costs shall include only the provision in paragraph 7 and 9, such costs.
11. the calculation of the eligible costs of the project shall also include the financial reserve for unexpected expenses that can be up to five percent of this rule 7.5, 7.6, and 7.7. eligible costs referred to in point totals. The financial reserve of the project uses this rule 7.5, 7.6, and 7.7. eligible costs referred to in (a), before the use of financial reserves by amending the agreement for the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement).
III. Requirements to the project applicant Project applicant has 12 special economic zone authority.
13. On the financing of the Cohesion Fund does not qualify: 13.1 if land or port. proper, within the territory of which these rules referred to in paragraph 2, the historically contaminated sites, not the applicant's project, owned, held or controlled;
13.2. If the applicant has received or anticipates receiving national or European Union funding for the same eligible costs under other programs.
14. the project for the implementation of the project, the applicant does not constitute a partnership.
15. The cohesion fund the project applicant cost-benefit analysis carried out in accordance with Annex 1 of these rules.
IV. Project selection and submission of application conditions 16. the responsible authority shall: 16.1. call for project submissions sent by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design) during the two months following the entry into force of these regulations;
16.2. in the month following the entry into force of these regulations, establish and approve the project application to the limited selection of project submissions for evaluation of metodikuun project application form filling methodology;
16.3. in the month following the entry into force of these provisions place the Environment Ministry's website a limited application of the selection of projects project application form (annex 2), project submission evaluation form (annex 3), the project application and assessment methodology for the implementation of the project the necessary methodological material (procurement guidelines and procurement documents);
16.4. the projects proposed recorded submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks after receipt of the project application to the applicant, be sent electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) or by post, proof of receipt of the application for the project. If the application is submitted in person, the responsible authority proof of receipt of the application, the project shall be issued immediately, stating the registration number.
17. the project application to the responsible authority within two months of the dispatch of the call for project applicants. The competent authority may extend the application of the project for a period of time up to two months, a letter informing potential project applicant project application submission deadline extension: 17.1. where the European Union fund Monitoring Committee decided on changes to the project evaluation criteria applications;
17.2. If, after the date of the invitation to these regulations is amended.

18. If the project application selection round invited potential project applicant does not submit the application within the time limit or the decision to reject the application of the project, the responsible authority shall call for project submissions retries during the year, but not earlier than six months after the submission of the project application to the end of the statutory period, or after the decision rejecting the application for the project.
19. the maximum cohesion fund aid intensity shall not exceed 85 per cent of the eligible costs.
20. the project applicant project application (annex 2) prepared according to the rules set out in annex 3 of the draft application evaluation criteria. 
V. application assessment and Project decision-making 21. the responsible authority shall establish a restricted project application selection the cohesion fund the project application for the evaluation of the Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission) and approved its Statute. The Evaluation Commission is composed of the responsible authority, the Environment Ministry and representatives of the managing authority, as well as one representative of the Association or Foundation, which purpose related to environmental issues, including in the area of environmental pollution. The Evaluation Commission, the managing authority shall participate as observers, without voting rights. If the Association or Foundation within 15 working days after the invitation of the authority responsible for the insertion of the Ministry of environment Web site puts forward the Evaluation Commission, a representative of the authority responsible for the evaluation, the Commission established the driver without his. If the participation of the representatives of the Commission in evaluating the power of several associations or foundations, the responsible authority shall include in its assessment the Commission or foundation of the society's representative, who rated highest according to the following criteria: 21.1. higher education in the areas related to environmental issues, including in the area of environmental pollution;
21.2. the experience of the application of the project evaluation.
22. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 22.1. first project submissions valued in conformity with this provision of the annex 3 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33, paragraph administrative criteria. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
22.2. If the application of these rules in the criteria referred to in paragraph 22.1 evaluates to "Yes", the application is assessed according to annex 3 of these rules 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 36, 37, 38 and 39 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
22.3. where the application of this provision in the criteria referred to in paragraph 22.2. evaluates to "Yes", the application is assessed according to annex 3 of these rules 14, 15, 17, 23, 24, 25, 34, 35 and 40. criteria referred to in paragraph 1, as well as quality criteria and criteria of horizontal priorities. If the application does not comply with a judgement that rule 3 of the annex 1., 2., 3., 4. and 5. the above quality criteria, as well as paragraphs 6 and 7 above, the criteria of horizontal priorities, project evaluation, the application will not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
22.4. If the application complies with this rule 22.3. referred to quality criteria and criteria of horizontal priorities, project submissions valued under the provisions of paragraph 41 of annex 3 of this criterion. If the rating is "no", the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project.
23. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if: it corresponds to this rule 23.1. the projects referred to in annex 3 to the application evaluation criteria;
23.2. funding is available for the implementation of the project.
24. the decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, so that it could conclude an agreement: 24.1. specify information about the project the applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 2);
24.2. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, paragraph 40 of annex 3 contains the criterion;
24.3. to clarify the documents presented under this provision in annex 3, paragraph 34 and 35 specific criteria;
15.2. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and eligible costs according to the provisions of paragraph 7 and 11;
15.2. to clarify the changes in total amount of eligible costs and non-eligible costs under this provision, paragraph 9;
24.6. to clarify the project time schedule according to the planned project activity (annex 3 of the criteria specified in paragraph 17);
15.3. to clarify the cash flow forecast (3.23 criteria specified in paragraph);
15.4. to clarify the implementation of the planned projects and planned human resources function of the beneficiaries (paragraph 24 of the annex 3 of the specified criteria);
15.5. to clarify the planned publicity and information dissemination actions (annex 3, paragraph 25, the specified criteria).
25. the decision on the approval of the project application, provided the applicant fulfilled the project authority within the time limit set, which may not exceed two months from the date of receipt of the decision. That decision laid down must not be extended.
26.20 working days after the decision on approval of the application, the project on condition that the expiration of the evaluation the Commission shall assess the fulfilment of the conditions contained in the decision and the responsible authority shall prepare and sign the opinion. Responsible authority within two working days after the signing of the opinion sends the draft opinions to the applicant.
27. If the applicant in the decision approving the project application, provided the conditions laid down are not met or are not met the deadline, the responsible authority is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected.
28. the decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection provided the determining authority within five working days after the decision by post or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) to the project applicant.
Vi. Procurement procedure and conditions for the implementation of the project the first 29. procurement procedures shall, within three months following submission of the project's approval. If the estimated contract price: 29.1. is less about the public procurement regulatory laws laid down in the public procurement contract price limits, the procurement procedure shall be carried out by the beneficiaries of the Cohesion Fund (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary);
29.2. is equal to the public procurement regulatory laws laid down in the public procurement contract price limits or is larger than those of the procurement procedure, carry out the Ministry of the environment as a central purchasing body.
30. If the beneficiary does not comply with the regulations governing the procurement requirements, the costs arising from the conclusion of contracts, are considered non-eligible costs of the project.
31. the funding recipient: 31.1. all project activities implemented within four years after the conclusion of the agreement, but not later than 1 June 2015.
31.2. not less frequently than every three months, provides a snapshot of the project applicant insert a Web site about the project implementation process;
31.3. ensure the preparation and submission of the report the body responsible under the agreement.
32. If the agreement, but the project requires amendments, the beneficiary shall provide the responsible authority proposal for amendments to the conditions of the agreement before the proposals in sections of the operations.
33. the conditions of the agreement shall be amended: 33.1. If the physical indicators of the project changes during the implementation of the project shall not exceed five percent of the eligible costs of the project during project implementation;
33.2. If changes in the project's procurement plan does not change the total amount of the purchase.
34. If the responsible authority is the financial resources available, the conditions of the agreement within the time limits and in order to transfer an advance payment to the recipient of the funding. Advances and interim payments, as well as all of the Cohesion Fund project expenditure necessary means of funding the recipient opens an account in the Treasury, from which all payments in implementing cohesion fund projects.
VII. monitoring activities after project implementation 35. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation and results of the project is maintained for at least five years after the final payment for the project.
36. Information on the results of the project are maintained in accordance with the provisions of annex 4 to the beneficiary once a year for a period of five years after the final payment under the project submitted to the responsible body, if the agreement specifies a longer period of time. The first time these rules laid down in annex 4 supervisory overview the beneficiary responsible body shall submit within one year after the last payment is made on the project.

37. the competent authority for at least five years after the final payment under the project (if the agreement specifies a longer period) to ensure information accumulation and analysis of the achievement of the objectives of the activity.
The Prime Minister's site-traffic Minister k. Gerhard Environment Minister, Minister for welfare U. of annex 1 Augul Cabinet of 20 July 2010 Regulation No. 662 of the cohesion fund the project cost-benefit analysis 1. Cohesion Fund projects to develop such cost-benefit analysis: 1.1. financial analysis;
1.2. economic analysis;
1.3. analysis of alternatives;
1.4. risk analysis;
1.5. sensitivity analysis.
2. analysis of Financial development, subject to the legislation of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in certain macroeconomic indicators, which the responsible authority shall publish on its Web site at www.vidm.gov.lv.
3. Financial analysis includes the following parts: 3.1. evaluation period;
3.2. the discount rate;
3.3. the total investment and the national capital efficiency;
3.4. sensitivity analysis.
4. Financial analysis is conducted on the basis of the diskontētaj cash flows for a period of 30 years, including investments in learning.
5. the evaluation used the following indicators: 5.1 financial investment yield rate (FRR/C) and the net present value (FNPV/C);
5.2. financial capital yield rate (FRR/K) and the net present value (FNPV/K), calculating and justifying funding sources (State budget, co-financing by the Fund of the European Union);
5.3. the benefit-cost ratio (B/C);
5.4. payment ratio (DSCR).
6. financial assessment is carried out when implementing the project, the revenue shortfalls. In this case the European Union rate of aid according to the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55, assuming that the difference between investments in eligible activities to be covered from the State budget.
7. Economic analysis include the following: 7.1. qualitative and quantitative methods;
7.2. environmental quality criteria;
7.3. the benefits in money terms;
7.4. calculation of efficiency.
8. the project economic analysis evaluates the costs and benefits to society arising from the implementation of recovery projects.
9. Develop a project created by the loss of income, savings, and the cost of the discounted cash flow. Benefits or costs apply to all Latvian society. On this basis, cash flow, calculated economic internal rate of return (EIRR), economic net present value (ENPV) and the benefit-cost ratio (B/C ratio).
10. the analysis of alternatives includes the following parts: 10.1 the inertia scenario (investments do not invest);
10.2. the investment scenario.
11. The inertia scenario simulates the cash flows (for example, having regard to the contaminated areas monitoring costs, area security, prevention of possible emergency situations, natural resource taxes and penalties).
12. Investment scenario takes into account the capital costs of the restoration of the object, its current costs of maintenance, to ensure the implementation of the project within an acceptable level of risk, the potential income from further use of the adjacent territory. Investment scenario in the framework of the rehabilitation of the appearance of carrying out alternative options (for example, removal rate, methods, technologies, cost), as well as analyse the different use of the territory of perspective, taking into account the potential revenue.
13. Risk analysis includes the following risk factors: 13.1. emergency prevention (e.g., leakage of dangerous substances, the fauna of the massive destruction, the origin of the epidemic);
13.2. the gradual spread of environmental pollution effects (e.g., surface, ground, soil, water, air pollution, as well as losses related to the health of the population from pollution problems).
14. determine the potential risks, classified and evaluated if no contaminated sites remediation, as well as if the project is implemented.
15. the sensitivity analyses of the project, subject to the key factors that affect the implementation of the project (for example, the amount of investment the investment, running costs, funding from a variety of sources, if one is provided, the discount rate).
16. Cost-benefit analysis the results of the cohesion fund the project description submission part 7.
The Minister of the Environment-Minister of welfare instead U., Ministry of the environment submitted by Augul version of annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 July 2010 Regulation No. 662 of the cohesion fund the project submission form instead of the Minister of the environment, the Welfare Minister, U. of annex 3 Augul Cabinet of 20 July 2010 | Regulation No. 662 of the cohesion fund the project submission form for the evaluation of PO box
Criteria assessment criteria of quality assessment of points 1. planned activities the project ready to start: obtain at least 1 paragraph 1.1., the project is ready to start (a list of the works to be carried out is not prepared or not prepared qualitatively) 0 1.2. project readiness is low to start (is prepared and based on the list of the works to be carried out, the purchase documentation not prepared) 1 1.3. project is the launch of the medium are readiness (ready and reasonable list of works to be up the purchase documentation projects development) 2 1.4. project has high readiness for initiation (developed the technical design of the works, prepared for the technical specifications of the procurement) 3 2. Risk assessment, including potential cost increases during project implementation: must be at least 2 paragraphs 2.1. risk are not assessed 0 2.2. potential risks assessed not completely – action plan identified risks has 1 2.3 action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete 2 2.4. potential risks assessed quality-crafted based action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3
3. the project in the application is analyzed the possible alternatives to the project and the project economic analysis: must be at least 2 to 3.1 is not analyzed for possible alternatives and has not carried out an economic analysis of the project 0 3.2. analyze only one of the parameters (only the analysis of alternatives or only economic analysis) 1 3.3 is analyzed the possible alternatives and make the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives 2 3.4 is analyzed the possible alternatives and make the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives, as well as the selected alternative is the lowest cost 3 4. sustainability assessment of investments – investments in future (maintenance costs) that would be required to match the object environment after the implementation of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 4.1. future costs are not assessed 0 4.2. further investment of 15 percent or more of the ways of the project's eligible expenditure 1 4.3. further investment in ways less than 15 percent of the eligible costs of the project amount 3 4.4. further investment will be required 5 5. an analysis of the consequences if the project is not implemented: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1., the consequences are not analyzed 5.2 consequences assessed 0 incomplete 1 5.3 consequences assessed only qualitatively – information is not provided for the following financial assessment 2 5.4. possible consequences assessed in the long term, the evaluation shall be based on the competent authorities or organisations findings and studies that provide information about the financial implications of the evaluation criteria of 3 horizontal priorities rating points 6. Project intended to focus on sustainable development technology : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 6.1. the project is not described in the application's choice of technology 0 6.2. selected technology limits the contamination but did not eliminate the pollution source 1 6.3. selected technology eliminates the pollution source, but does not provide a range of pollution clean-up of selected technology 2 6.4. eliminates the pollution source, partially or fully provide the range of pollution clean-up of Contaminated sites remediation 3 7. is significant to the region's further development (of the balanced development of the territory) : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 7.1. submission of a project is not described in the bailout's impact on development of the region 0 7.2. minimized the threat of environmental pollution and public health: a territory is not intended to include in the economic chain 1 7.3. rehabilitation of the territory of the economic activities in the territory of the bailout 2 7.4 provides its unlimited use of the 3 eligibility criteria for project eligibility criteria Yes/No. 8. The concentration of pollutants in the historically contaminated location exceed the environmental quality standards for the limit N 9. that the project will reduce the spread of the pollution and its effects on the Baltic Sea water quality N 10.

The project aims to implement a historically contaminated site established the Latvian environment, geology and Meteorology Centre of contaminated and potentially contaminated sites and in the registry under the registry data recognized as contaminated sites N 11. project intended to implement the historically contaminated site that can not apply the "polluter pays" principle, as the body responsible for the creation of pollution, the country no longer exists, nor is there a direct successor to the obligations and responsibilities of the project application to the N 12. complies with the regulations on the implementation of the activity specified in the activity purpose N 13. project the application complies with the regulations on the implementation of the requirements of the activity activity eligible activities N 14. Project submissions included in eligible costs comply with the laws and regulations on the implementation of the activity activity set out the eligible costs of the project application, P 15. not included in the eligible costs comply with the laws and regulations on the implementation of the activity of activity not specified eligible costs P 16. Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 16.1. given the technical characteristics of the activities to be listed in the output of 16.2. indicators and they meet the purpose of the activity specified 16.3. actions for the positioning of the project area indicated 16.4. what economic benefits specified actions to be 16.5. qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits specified actions to 16.6. qualitative and quantitative contribution of the European Union and the Republic of Latvia laws implementing the essential requirements in the field of prevention of pollution 16.7 described the principle of "the polluter pays" grounds of non-compliance with the time schedule of the project 17 matches scheduled activities P 18. the information provided in the application stating the project applicant will ensure the sustainability of the project results: N 18.1 is an appropriate institutional framework is adequately planned 18.2. pēcsanācij monitoring cost 18.3. is or will be available for staff to ensure the monitoring of the pēcsanācij application Project contains 19 works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed goals N 20. Project financial analysis carried out in accordance with the laws and regulations on the implementation of the activity N 21. Cohesion Fund co-financing requested the aid intensity does not exceed 85 percent of the project's eligible costs N 22.
The project budget includes cost: N 22.1. proportionate and reasonable, clearly stated assumptions cost calculations are directly necessary 22.2. project 23. project cash flow forecast is based: P 23.1. displays both funding request and the cost forecast of 23.2. meet the planned timetable 23.3. meet the project's financial plan for the project in the application reflect the 24 planned organisation chart for the implementation of the project and human resources ensure planned legislation for the European Union to the projects financed by the Fund in financing specific recipient management functions : P 24.1. project management (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 24.2. financial management of the project (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) 24.3. technical management of the project (for example, reconciliation in design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) 25. Project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the 8 December 2006 by Commission Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006, which lays down rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, the Project for article 8 P applicant eligibility criteria Yes/No 26. Project applicant to, owned, held or controlled site or port is proper, which historically is located in a place contaminated N 27. the project shall ensure at least 15 percent of the eligible costs of the project and the funding of eligible costs cover, if any, are provided in the project (project submitted by the applicant) N administrative criteria yes/no/NA 28. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the time specified in the invitation N 29. Project applicant is invited to submit a project application N application of the project 30, prepared according to the activity application form for project submissions 31 N ready N 32. Latvian language project submission prepared into N 33. project submission signed by the applicant's institution of a project authorized person N 34. Filed one project application, the original and one copy of the as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) 35. project original and a copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) 36. project application and attachments are presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulatory laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 37. project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 38. submission of the project and attachments designed for DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 39. project application form filled in all sections of the project application N 40. added to all specified attachments: P 24.9. using the contaminated areas of the plan summary project the graphical material of 40.2., showing the location of project activities in the project area. environmental monitoring 25.0 national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of the municipality of 40.4. that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed to 25.2. about pēcsanācij of the institution responsible for monitoring the receipt of monitoring carried out in accordance with the legislation on the reorganisation process management (financial and human resources support) 40.6. public works estimate 40.7. the project cash flow forecast funding criteria Yes/No 41. project planned in the application of the Cohesion Fund co-financing does not exceed regulations on the implementation of the project activities for the prescribed maximum cohesion fund co-financing N legend : N-if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected.
P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision).
NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed on this criterion.
The Minister of the Environment-Minister of welfare instead. 4. Annex Augul Cabinet of 20 July 2010 regulations No 662 follow-up project project title funding recipient project implementation time (month and year) agreements concluded for the implementation of a project (URdd.mm. yyyy.)
 
The project is implemented (Cohesion Fund received final payment) (URdd.mm. yyyy.)
 
Questionnaire date (yyyy. URdd.mm.)
Reporting period date the previous questionnaire (questionnaire submitted, for the first time, specify a completion date of the project) the reference period (months) URdd.mm. yyyy.

1. the project's compliance with project objectives set out in the application, no PO box
Application specific objective results achieved (by the project) compliance with the specific purpose (the day of submission of the questionnaires) discrepancies description (fill in if necessary) 1.
 
 
 
 
2.
 
 
 
 
..
 
 
 
 
2. The project outcome indicators of the project reached compliance with no PO box
Application outcome indicator specified in the table of results Achieved (by the project) compliance with the specific outcome indicators (on the day of submission of the questionnaires) discrepancies description (fill in if necessary) 1.
 
 
 
 
2.
 
 
 
 
..
 
 
 
 

3. the project's compliance with the environmental quality objectives pursued, no PO box
The target set in the application regarding the enforcement of the laws (specify parameters with values) compliance with the requirements of the legislation (date of submission of the questionnaire, please specify parameters with values) in the grounds of non-compliance (fill in if necessary) 1.
 
 
 
2.
 
 
 
..
 
 
 

4. Former contaminated sites further use according to the planning application for the further use of the given territory area (on the day of submission of the questionnaires) discrepancies description (fill in if necessary) 5. Refine the areas of nationality

The application specified in the legal status of the territory (territory owners specify/lease term) the owner of the legal status of the territory (the day of the submission of the questionnaire – specify the owner of the territory. If the conclusion of a new contract of hire, add a copy of the contract) reasons for non-compliance (fill in if necessary) 6. Pēcsanācij the results of the monitoring carried out by the project in compliance with the planned decontamination purposes specified in the application recovery objectives (specify separately the bottom water and groundwater remediation objectives) Monitoring results (on the day of submission of the questionnaire – specify separately the bottom water and groundwater remediation goals) the reasons of non-compliance (fill in if necessary) 7. pēcsanācij monitoring carried out pursuant to the national environmental service requirements (describe the review of measures taken in the period) 8. Public information activities and the results of the project the benefits to society (described in the reporting period the measures taken, add newsletters, articles and other materials a copy of) the applicant (legal person) (paraksttiesīg persons name, surname and title) (signature) Note.
Document property "signature" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
The Minister of the Environment-Minister of welfare instead U have Augul.