Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 661 Riga 20 July 2010 (pr. No 37 46) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers on 30 September 2008. Regulations No. 817 "provisions for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' addition of activity historically 3.4.1.4." remediated "" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 30 September 2008. Regulations No. 817 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix 3.4.1.4. activity" remediated "" (Latvian journal 2008, 164. No.) the following amendments: 1. Make the second sentence of paragraph 3 as follows: "the available public funds consist of the European regional development fund co-financing lats and 23368233 the State budget funding to 10014957 lats."
2. Delete paragraph 4.
3. Replace the words "in paragraph 9.1 a consensus document on the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement)" with the words "agreement for the implementation of a project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement)".
4. Replace the words in point 9.2 "document" with the word "conditions".
5. Express and 9.4 9.3 subparagraph by the following: "9.3. autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works covered by autoruzraudzīb. If you closed the combined design and works contracts, fixed payouts autoruzraudzīb restrictions apply to the submission of the project estimated costs;
9.4. building costs but no more than three percent of the eligible costs of the works covered by the Superintendence; ".
6. Supplement with 9.8 and 9.9. subparagraph such.: "6.1. cost of publicity if the publicity services shall not exceed the minimum requirements set by the Commission on 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, article 8;
9.9. value added tax costs, if they have not recovered from the State budget. "
7. Make paragraph 10 by the following: "10." this rule 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4 and 9.8 in such costs are eligible if they are justified by a service or works contract (joint construction and design contracts), except for the costs incurred, on the basis of the employment contract. "
8. Delete paragraphs 11 and 12.
9. Express points 13 and 14 by the following: ' 13. project costs shall include only the provision referred to in paragraph 9.
14. the total budget of the project comprises also financial contingency reserve, which can be up to five percent of this rule 9.5., 9.6 and 9.7 in the above eligible costs. The financial reserve of the project uses this rule 9.5, 9.6 and 9.7.. referred to cover eligible costs before financial reserves through the use of appropriate amendments to the terms of the arrangement. "
10. Make a point 15 as follows: "15. project applicant is municipality, State or municipal institution or agency that is responsible for historical contaminated sites remediation, if such a bailout is recognized as a priority in the national environmental policy plan, and in accordance with the contaminated and potentially contaminated sites registry data recognized as a class 1 contaminated sites."
11. To supplement the provisions of this paragraph 16.3.: "If the project application 16.3 in pollution prevention for all or part of the site it is possible to detect the pollution creators."
12. Express 18 as follows: "18. selection of project submissions in two project application to the advertised selection rounds according to the relevant period available under the European regional development fund co-financing funds. The first application round project for the European regional development fund co-financing are 22974663 lats, the second application round of projects available for the European regional development fund co-financing of at least 393570 dollars. If the first submission round of projects available for the European regional development fund co-financing is not used, it is used in the project application in the second selection round of financing. "
13. Express the point 20 as follows: "the application of the project 20. responsible authority within two months of the invitation is sent, the project applicants. If the project application selection round invited potential project applicant does not submit the application within the time limit or the decision to reject the application of the project, the responsible authority shall call for project submissions retries, within two years, but not earlier than six months after the submission of the project application to the end of the statutory period, or after the decision rejecting the application for the project. The competent authority may extend the application of the project for a period of time up to two months, a letter informing potential applicants for the project the project submission deadline extension: 20.1. Fund of the European Union Monitoring Committee decided on changes to the project evaluation criteria applications;
20.2. If, after the date of the invitation to these regulations is amended. "
14. paragraph 23 of the following expressions: "23. Project applicant project application (annex 3) prepared according to the rules referred to in annex 4 of the draft application evaluation criteria."
15. To withdraw the 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28.
16. Make the paragraph 29 by the following:

29. the responsible authority shall establish a restricted application of the selection of projects under the European regional development fund project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission assessment) and approved its Statute. The Evaluation Commission is composed of the responsible authority, the Environment Ministry and representatives of the managing authority, as well as one representative of the Association or Foundation, of which the operational objective related to environmental issues, including in the area of environmental pollution. The Evaluation Commission, the managing authority shall participate as observers, without voting rights. If the Association or Foundation within 15 working days after the invitation of the authority responsible for the insertion of the Ministry of environment Web site puts forward the Evaluation Commission, a representative of the authority responsible for the evaluation, the Commission established the driver without their representatives. If its representatives for participation in the evaluation the Commission authorised a number of associations or foundations, the responsible authority shall include the Evaluation Commission of the Association or Foundation representative, who is rated the highest by the following criteria: 29.1. higher education in the areas related to environmental issues, including in the area of environmental pollution;
29.2. experience in the preparation of the application projects or project management. "
17. Make the following section 30.3.: 30.3. the projects proposed recorded submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks the project applicant or transmitted electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature), or by post proof of receipt of the application for the project. If the application is submitted in person, the responsible authority shall on receipt of the application of the project, indicating the registration number, immediately after receipt of the application for the project. "
18. Amend paragraph 32 and 33.
19. Make 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38 of the following paragraph: "34. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 34.1. first project submissions valued in conformity with this provision of the annex 4, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31, paragraph administrative criteria. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection;
21.3. If the application of these rules 34.1. in the criteria referred to in (a) evaluates to "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 34, 35, 36 and 37 of the criteria referred to in paragraph. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the evaluation of the application of the project did not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection;
3. where the application of this provision in the criteria referred to in paragraph 34.2. evaluates to "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 4, 14, 16, 22, 23, 24, 32, 33 and 38. criteria referred to in paragraph 1, as well as quality criteria and criteria of horizontal priorities. If the application does not comply with this assessment of the provisions of annex 4, 1., 2., 3., 4. and 5. the above quality criteria, as well as paragraphs 6 and 7 above, the criteria of horizontal priorities, project evaluation, the application will not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection;
21.4. If the application complies with this rule 21.3. referred to quality criteria and criteria of horizontal priorities, project submissions valued under the provisions of paragraph 39 of annex 4 of this criterion. If the rating is "no", the evaluation of the application of the project did not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection.
35. If two or more project applications have received the same amount of points, the project application priority list ranked in the following order: 21.8. project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 1 criterion;
35.2. project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 6 criterion;
35.3. the project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 4 this criterion;
35.4. a project application with the highest ranking according to annex 4 to these regulations, paragraph 7 of the criterion.
36. the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project if: 36.1 it meets this provision. 4. projects listed in the annex to the application evaluation criteria;
36.2. the estimated project listing submissions priority order (starting with the most points got a submission of the project), the project application selection round is available on the financing for the project.
37. the decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions that the project applicant must meet the deadline set in the decision, so that it could conclude an agreement: 37.1. specify information about the project the applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 3);
23.1. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, paragraph 38 of this criterion;
37.3. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, paragraph 32 and 33 of this criterion;
23.2. to clarify changes in the total amount of eligible costs and eligible costs according to the provisions of paragraph 9 and 14;
37.5. specify the project time schedule according to the planned project activity (annex 4 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 16);
23.4. to clarify the cash flow forecast (annex 4, paragraph 22, criterion);
37.7. to clarify the implementation of the planned projects and planned human resources function of the beneficiaries (annex 4 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 23);
23.5. refine the planned publicity and information dissemination measures (annex 4 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 24).

38. the head of the authority responsible for major projects can take a decision on the conformity of the project the project submission application evaluation criteria and determine what application is not specified or incorrect information to be included in the application for the project to be prepared in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, the annex XXI. Decision on the application of the project in compliance with the large project application evaluation criteria may include such conditions that the project applicant must meet the time limit specified in the decision: 38.1. specify information about the project the applicant (contact information and properties) (annex 3);
23.7. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, paragraph 38 of this criterion;
23.8. to clarify the documents presented under this provision, annex 4, paragraph 32 and 33 of this criterion;
23.9. to clarify changes in the total amount of eligible costs and eligible costs according to the provisions of paragraph 9 and 14;
38.5. specify the time frame of the project according to the planned project activity (annex 4 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 16);
24.0. specify cash flow forecast (annex 4, paragraph 22, criterion);
36.6. the implementation of a project to refine the projected and planned human resources function of the beneficiaries (annex 4 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 23);
24.1. refine the planned publicity and information dissemination measures (annex 4, paragraph 24, the criteria). "
20. Put 41 and 42 as follows: "41.20 working days after the decision on approval of the application, the project on condition that the expiration of the evaluation the Commission shall assess the fulfilment of the conditions contained in the decision and the responsible authority shall prepare and sign the opinion about it. Responsible authority within two working days after the signing of the opinion sends it to the project applicant.
42. If the applicant for the project conditions laid down in the decision is not complied with or is not complied with within the time limit set, the opinion of the responsible authority is negative and the project application is considered to have been rejected. "
21. Replace paragraph 52 and 54, the words "agreement" with the words "agreed terms".
22. Delete paragraph 57.
23. Make 58 the following: "58. Beneficiaries of all project activities implemented within four years after the conclusion of the agreement, but not later than June 1, 2015."
24. in paragraph 61 of the following expression: ' 61. If agreed, but the project requires amendments, the beneficiary shall provide the responsible authority proposal for amendments to the conditions of the agreement prior to the operation of the proposals. "
25. replace 62, 66 and 67., the word "document" with the word "conditions".
26. Express of annex 1 section 2 by the following: "2. the second application round project no BC
The project of the European regional development fund, the maximum funding (LVL) 1st Olaine liquid hazardous waste dump, rehabilitation projects, round 2 393 570 total 393 570 "27. Express new version of annex 3 (annex).
28. Make the annex by the following: "4. in the annex to Cabinet of 30 September the Regulation No. 817 European regional development fund project application form of Evaluation Criteria rating 1 p.k.. quality criteria for rating points 1. planned activities the project ready to start: obtain at least 1 paragraph 1.1., the project is ready to start (a list of the works to be carried out is not prepared or not prepared qualitatively) 0 1.2. project readiness is low to start (is ready and reasonable list of works to be purchase documentation not prepared) 1 1.3. project is ready for the launch of the medium (and has been prepared for based list of works to prepare the purchase documentation projects development) 2 1.4. project has high readiness for initiation (developed the technical design of the works, prepared for the technical specifications of the procurement) 3 2. Project risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost growth: obtain at least 2 points 2.1. the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment in the application of the project 0 2.2 risk evaluation performed does not completely , the action plan identified risks are not developed or not developed completely 1 2.3. application is made in the project quality risk assessment action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete submission of project 2.4 2 has made a qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 3. project in the application is analyzed the possible alternatives to the project and the project economic analysis : must be at least 2 3.1. alternative analysis has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 3.2. analysis carried out only one parameter (the only alternative analysis or economic analysis only) 1 3.3. analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the selection of the proposed alternative 2 alternative is made 3.4 analysis and project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives as well as the selected alternative is the lowest cost 3 4. sustainability assessment of investments – investments in future (maintenance costs) that would be needed to make the territory historically contaminated sites remediation, meet environmental requirements by project implementation: you must obtain at least 1 paragraph 4.1. future evaluation not done 0 4.2 subsequent costs 15 percent or more of the ways of the project's eligible expenditure 1 4.3. further cost ways less than 15 percent of the eligible costs of the project amount 3 4.4. does not require an analysis of the effects 5 5. If the project is not implemented: obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1. impact analysis is performed following evaluation 5.2 0 was made incomplete 1 5.3. quality is carried out only after the evaluation, the information is not provided for the following financial assessment 2 5.4.

has made possible an assessment of the long-term effects, which is justified by the competent authorities or organisations findings and studies that provide information about the financial implications of the evaluation criteria 1.1 3 horizontal priorities rating points 6. intended for use in a project on sustainable development focused technology: must obtain at least 1 paragraph 6.1. the project is not described in the application's choice of technology 0 6.2. selected technology limits the contamination but did not eliminate the pollution source 1 6.3. selected technology eliminates the pollution source but does not provide a range of pollution clean-up of selected technology 2 6.4. eliminates the pollution source, in whole or in part, provides the range of pollution clean-up of Contaminated sites remediation 3 7. is significant to the region's further development (of the balanced development of the territory): obtain at least 1 paragraph 7.1. submission of a project is not described in the bailout's impact on development of the region 0 7.2. minimized the threat of environmental pollution and public health: a territory is not intended to include in the economic chain 1 7.3. rehabilitation of the territory of the economic activities in the territory of the bailout 2 7.4 provides its unlimited the 3 2. eligibility criteria 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No 8. Concentrations of pollutants included in the eligible costs exceed the environmental quality standards limit N 9. Anticipated that the project will reduce the spread of the pollution and its effects on groundwater, river basin or the Baltic Sea water quality N 10. project intended to implement the historically contaminated sites established the Latvian environment, geology and Meteorology Centre of contaminated and potentially contaminated sites and in the registry under the registry data recognized as contaminated sites N 11.
The project is intended to implement the historically contaminated site that can not apply the "polluter pays" principle, as the body responsible for the creation of pollution, the country no longer exists, nor is there a direct successor to the obligations and responsibilities of the project application to the N 12. complies with the regulations on the implementation of the activity specified in the activity purpose N 13. the project submission complies with the regulations on the implementation of the requirements of the activity activity eligible activities N 14. Project submissions included in eligible costs comply with the laws and regulations on the implementation of the activity activity set out the eligible costs of the project application, P 15. project description provides the necessary information on the action to be taken: N 15.1. given the technical characteristics of the activities to be specified in the result of 15.2 and outcome indicators, and they meet the purpose of the activity provided 15.3. actions for the positioning of the project area provided 15.4. what economic benefits 15.5. actions provided qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits. provide activities to 15.6 qualitative and quantitative contribution to the European Union and the Republic of Latvia laws implementing the essential requirements in the field of prevention of pollution 15.7. describes the polluter-pays principle grounds of non-compliance with the time schedule of the project 16 matches planned activities P 17. information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant the sustainability of project results: N 17.1. have the appropriate institutional structure is appropriate for a planned 17.2. pēcsanācij monitoring costs 17.3. is or will be available for staff to ensure the monitoring of the pēcsanācij application Project contains 18 works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed goals N 19. Project financial analysis conducted according to the law on the implementation of the activity Required in N 20. European regional development fund co-financing support intensity does not exceed 70 per cent of the eligible costs of the project N 21. Project budget includes cost: N 21.1. proportionate and reasonable, clearly stated assumptions cost calculations are directly necessary 21.2. project 22. project cash flow forecast is based: P 22.1. displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 22.2. meet the planned timetable 22.3. meet the financial plan of the project the project submission 23. reflected in the introduction of the planned project organisation chart and planned human resources provides legislation for the European Union to the projects financed by the Fund in financing specific control requested features: P 23.1. project management (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 23.2. financial management of the project (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) 23.3. technical management of the project (for example, reconciliation in design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) project planned 24. publicity and information dissemination activities of the Commission of 8 December 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1828/2006, which lays down rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, and the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund, article 8 P 2.2 Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No 25. Project applicant to, owned, held or controlled is the land on which is located the historical contaminated sites N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 26. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the time specified in the invitation N
27. the project applicant is invited to submit a project application N application 28 project drawn up according to the activity application form for submission of the project N 29. Latvian language ready N 30. submission of the project drawn up into N 31. Project submissions from the applicant institution project signed by the authorized person N 32. Filed one project application, the original and one copy, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) 33. project original and copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot , the attached document pages numbered (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) 34.

The project application and attachments are presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulatory laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 35. project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 36. project application and attachments are designed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 37. project application form completed in all of its sections, N 38. the project attached to the application, all listed in the annex : P 38.1. use contaminated areas of the plan summary project cartographic material 38.2., showing the location of project activities project area 23.8. Environment monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, the non-application of 23.9. local Government certifying that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed to 38.5. the institution responsible for monitoring pēcsanācij receipt of monitoring carried out in accordance with the legislation on the reorganisation process management (financial and human resources support) 24.0. estimate of the works
 
 
36.6. the project cash flow forecast 4. Funding criteria Yes/No 39. project planned in the application of the European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed regulations on the implementation of the activities set out in annex 1 to the maximum of the European regional development fund co-financing for the project N legend.
N – If a negative rating, the application is rejected.
P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission deadline of the decision).
NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. "
29. The deletion of annex 5.
The Prime Minister's site-traffic Minister k. Gerhard Environment Minister – the Minister of welfare and the Ministry of the environment submitted by Augul adopted annex to the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 July 2010 regulations no 661 "annex 3 Cabinet 30 September 2008. Regulations No 817 Project submission form instead of the Minister of the environment, Welfare Minister u. Augul States