Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 867 Riga 2010 September (14. No 47 35) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 April 2008 regulations No 306 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "in addition to the activity of the" national 3.2.1.1.1st class road route alignment "" issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do Cabinet of 28 April 2008 regulations No 306 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "in addition to the activity of the" national 3.2.1.1.1st class road route sorting "(Latvian journal in 2008, 67 no; 2009, no. 113) the following amendments: 1. Complement 4.1 points in the second and third sentence as follows: "call for project submissions draft submission for the second selection round to send the competent authority no later than 30 December 2010. The subsequent project application selection round of the launch date and the application deadline determined by the responsible authority, taking into account the funds available for one round. "
2. Make paragraph 5 by the following: "5. the overall activity on the European regional development fund co-financing rate is $139 155 192. The State budget funding for eligible costs are $24 556 798. "
3. Replace paragraph 6, third sentence, the words "maximum" with a number and the words "85 percent of the project total eligible costs".
4. Express 10.3. subparagraph by the following: "10.3. slip road maintenance costs during the construction of the parent path (if you use the existing road network);".
5. Make the following paragraph 10.11: "10.11. project activities directly related to the publicity costs, consistent with the laws of European Union funds publicity and visual identity requirements;".
6. The deletion of paragraph 14, the words "(one original and one copy)".
7. Delete paragraph 15, the words "subject to this provision set out in paragraph 25 administrative criteria".
8. Delete paragraph 17.
9. Supplement with 24.1 points as follows: "in the second and subsequent project 15.0 application selection rounds submitted project submissions valued under the provisions referred to in annex 3 of the draft application evaluation criteria."
10. Supplement with 29.1 points as follows: 29.1 the responsible authority "at the second and subsequent project application selection rounds submitted project applications approved, if the application complies with all the rules referred to in annex 3 of the assessment criteria. If the application does not need to specify the corresponding to any of the provisions of section I of annex 3 of the above evaluation criteria, which allow an application for the approval of the project, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition. The responsible authority shall reject the application for the project if it does not match any of the rules referred to in annex 3 of the assessment criteria, which prevent the approval of a project application with the condition. "
11. Delete paragraph 30.
12. Express 31 the following: "31. project criteria for the evaluation of the application to the relevant project submissions are ranked in descending order by the planning regions, the number of points received for compliance with quality criteria. Approval of project applications driven by descending order, subject to available funding planning region within the quota. "
13. Replace paragraph 36 a number and the word "with" in paragraph 35, the number and the word "34".
14. Express 37 as follows: "37. If the conditions contained in the enforcement of these regulations has not been carried out within the time limits laid down in paragraph 34, or the opinion of the authority responsible for the conditions in the decision is negative, the European regional development fund project submissions rejected. "
15. To supplement the provisions of Chapter VII, the following wording: "VII. Closing questions 38. These rules 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 shall apply to the conditions set out in the first round of project submissions.
39. These provisions 10.14 and 10.15.. the costs referred to in the second and subsequent project application selection round projects approved are attributable in total to 10 percent from the originally approved project total eligible costs.
40. This provision cost referred to in paragraph 10, second and subsequent project application selection rounds approved projects do not apply, if they occur, by establishing working relationship. "
16. Make the new version of annex 1 (annex 1).
17. Make the new version of annex 2 (annex 2).
18. To supplement the provisions of annex 3 (annex 3).
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky traffic Minister k. Gerhards traffic Ministry submitted version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 14 September 2010 regulations No 867 "annex 1: Cabinet of Ministers of 28 April 2008. Regulations No 306 traffic Minister k. Gerhard annex 2 Cabinet 14 September 2010 No. 867" provisions of annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 April 2008. Regulations No 306 of the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' addition of State activity "3.2.1.1.1st class road route alignment" of the European regional development fund co-financing quota through the planning regions No. PO box
1. The planning region class gravel and black pavement road (km) of class 1, as a percentage of the total length of the roads gravel roads (km) the percentage of class 1 road with gravel cover the total length of the planning region (overall length and proportion of gravel stage ratio 50:50) the ERDF co-financing (ls) 1.1099 20.66 Kurzeme 16.04% 0.183471% 25,530,944.57 212 2. Zemgale 17.71% 254 19.21% 0.184600 942 25,688,104.16 3.939% 11.04% 0.143471 19,964,768.55 17.65 146 4. Vidzeme 25.56% 484 36.61 1360%
5.43,259,943.32 0.310876 980 18.42% 226 Latgale 17.10% 0.177582 total 24,711,431.40 1,322,100.00% 139,155,192.00 5,320,100.00% 1.000000 "traffic Minister k. Gerhard annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 14 September 2010 regulations No 867" annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 April 2008. Regulations No 306 Project submission evaluation criteria the criteria I administrative evaluation system Criteria the impact on decision making (P * N **) Yes/No (1). the project proposal is submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity within a specific project, applicant 2 N shall be invited to submit a project application N 3.

Project submission prepared into N 4. Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 5. project submissions page is numbered N 6. project application has been drawn up according to the activity of the project submission form for N 7. Project application is completely filled in, and add all of the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activities set out in Annex N 8. application of the project financing plan is no arithmetic errors and correctly filled in application of the project 9 P is not addressed in the fix-deletions , aizkrāsojum, deletion or addition of N 10. project application is signed by the project head of the institution to the applicant or his authorised person N 11. application of the project eligible cost specified in headings correspond to the rules for the implementation of the identified activities eligible costs N II. eligibility criteria evaluation system be rejected or will be Yes/No 12. project is the Ministry of transport notifiers N 13. project application describes the project management, implementation and monitoring of the scheme, and it required resources (in the number of staff assigned , qualifications and responsibilities, the available material and technical base) N 14. Project management team have the appropriate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical knowledge N 15. developing projects, will be taken into account in the construction of the regulatory laws of the Republic of Latvia, and the project includes additional measures for promoting environmental accessibility for people with functional disabilities N 16. Implementation of the project, will prevent or minimize the project's negative impacts on the quality of the environment N 17. Project has performed economic analysis N 18. Project economic analysis is used in the social discount rate 5.5% N 19. project transport economic benefit-cost ratio of B/C ≥ 0.2 N 20. The project will be completed by 31 august 2015 N 21. during implementation of the project shall not exceed three years N 22. Project is essential for the planning region development (connects the regional development centers with national development or Riga, or with the trans-European network (TEN-T), or the availability of national or regional development centres) or project is the restoration of the previous road route in ongoing follow-up to and the project is on a route that is consistent with the planning region Development Council N 23. Project requested by the European regional development fund co-financing shall not exceed the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activities set out in annex 2 of the programming available to the regions of the European regional development fund co-financing quota N 24. contained in road infrastructure Project is located in the national road 1 class out in the Cabinet of Ministers of 29 September 2009. Regulations No 1104 "rules on the public road and state highway route in the local government-owned road-State lists" N 25. project monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable N 26. Design meets the objective of the activity comfortable and safe transport of class 1 national road network, asfaltēj the roads with gravel cover (including taking road sections within the bridge reconstruction) which ensures the development of the connection or the connection with the country's major roads, with priority given to roads with higher traffic intensity N 27 project planned publicity and information dissemination activities to comply with European Union funds, the implementation of related laws and requirements N 28. Ensuring the sustainability of the project results at least five years after the completion of the project N 29. Project budget includes expenditure corresponds to average market prices of the project in the year of application and the need to achieve the results of the project and planned activities for the implementation of the Project is 30 N and not been financed or co-financed from other Union financial sources as well as State and local budgets, as well as project planned activities do not overlap with the activities financed by other European Union co-financed the activities of the funds and other financial instruments within the N III. Criteria of quality evaluation system
Note the average 31 points for traffic road, contained in draft stage last year before the application of the project 100-200 car day 201-400 day 401-600 car car 24 hours a day 800-601-801-1000 car cars a day over a 24-hour car 1001 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 32. Average in spring and autumn the appropriate level of the actual vehicle mass limits group the road project for the period preceding three calendar years prior to the application of the project over 10.1 tonnes, 10 tonnes of 3.6-7.6 7.5 tonnes in 2.5- 33.3.5 tonnes and 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.5 spring autumn the permissible limits of the actual weight of the vehicle for the duration of the project period road average in the previous three calendar years prior to the application of the draft to 14 days 15-28 days to 42 days 29 43 – 0.5 1 1.5 2 34 56 days. Gravel cover the Visual assessment of the status of the road project for the period preceding calendar year prior to the application of the project (according to SJSC Latvian state roads "quality control procedure) good satisfactory poor project 1 2 3 35. the economic benefits of transport (B) and (C) of the cost ratio (the calculation shall take into account user benefits – time savings, vehicle operating cost reduction, traffic accidents cost reduction relative to the initial investment and maintenance costs) points are awarded according to B/C size and apply a factor of 5. For example, if project B/C = 2, then this criteria will receive 2 x 5 = 10 points in point B/C = (B/C) X 5 notes.
1. If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition.
2. If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project. "
Traffic Minister k. Gerhard