Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No 843 Riga 2010 September (14. No 47 71. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix. "support activity 3.6.2.1 County Municipal complex development" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' priorities 3.6 Appendix "Polycentric development" contributes UR3.6.2.pas complex support of municipal growth "3.6.2.1. activity" support the County Municipal complex development "(hereinafter referred to as the activity);
1.2 project submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project and the project application to the applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination.
2. The purpose of the activity is to contribute in terms of population the largest County development centres (those should be included in the overall national and regional development center network and supplement it) competitiveness and strengthening the functional link between the development and the piegulošaj areas under integrated local development programmes, providing support for business infrastructure (natural and physical environment), as well as to organize public service accessibility and mobility of the population.
3. the activity exercised limited project application selection.
4. activities supported under the project shall be financed from the European regional development fund co-financing and national public co-financing. Activity within the available public funds is 9 484 399 lats, including the European regional development fund co-financing – 8 061 738 dollars, and national public funding-1 422 661 lats.
5. The European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed 85 percent of the project's total eligible costs.
6. the project co-financing from the applicant not less than 15 percent of the project's total eligible costs.
7. the implementation of the activity provided by the responsible authority and the liaison body. The responsible authority's regional development and Municipal Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority), the authority is the National Agency for regional development (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body).
8. the responsible authority shall have the following functions: to provide activity 8.1 monitoring of information and publicity measures, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements;
8.2. provide activities for implementation, supervision and control, implementation of the activity and the application of evaluation criteria of the project design, to analyze the problems in the implementation of the activity and provide the managing authority and the European Union's structural funds and the Cohesion Fund Monitoring Committee proposals for the improvement of the implementation of the activity;
8.3. ensuring not to exceed the activity available for the implementation of the European regional development fund co-financing and monitoring available in the European regional development fund, including a learning Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the enforcement of this principle in the activity level;
5.2. develop project application assessment methodology and project submission form of evaluation methodologies;
8.5. the monitoring of the activity of the European Union to use the structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
8.6. the liaison bodies to assess the information and prepared to give an opinion on the draft changes that affect the project goals and objectives of the monitoring indicators.
9. Cooperation authority has the following functions: 9.1. ensure the implementation of the activity associated with the information and publicity measures, consistent with the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements;
9.2. publish on its Web site (www.vraa.gov.lv) with the project application selection associated documentation;
9.3. send a limited circle of project calls for project submissions;
9.4. develop and coordinate with the responsible authority for the project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission) rules, filling out the submission form for the project methodology, procedures for the submission of projects provides a selection and evaluation, financial analysis development methodology and cost efficiency analysis development methodology;
9.5. create Evaluation Commission;
9.6. provide project evaluation of the application and adopt a decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition, and to monitor the fulfilment of the conditions;
9.7. to examine the European regional development fund co-financing rate requested (hereinafter called beneficiaries) prepared the schedule for the submission of a request for payment;
9.8. develop draft agreement and conclude an agreement with the beneficiary of the financing for the implementation of a project;
9.9. the beneficiary submitted requests for payment, to approve the amounts of the eligible expenses to prepare payment orders and declarations of expenditure;
9.10. to consider and approve projects submitted progress reports;
9.11. assess the agreement amendments to harmonize them with the responsible authority, if the amendments concern the objectives of the project related changes, this rule 8.3. referred to the implementation of the principles and objectives of the monitoring indicators, and to take a decision on the amendments to the project;
9.12. the use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and accumulate at the data for project submissions and projects according to the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system;
9.13. to ensure the implementation of the project monitoring and control, including to carry out random checks in the project locations;

9.14. increasing control over the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;
9. consider the beneficiary's procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau;
9.16. to provide the Foundation of the European Union institutions involved in the management of information in accordance with the laws of the State budget funds requested;
9.17. provide information to the authority responsible for the preparation of activities for the implementation of the available funding.
10. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority.
II. Project activities and costs 11. Project has supported the following: 11.1 European Centre for the development of the competitiveness of vocational and functional linking between development and piegulošaj areas, creating or improving infrastructure and related public services or by encouraging economic development;
11.2. European Union structural funds and information pasākumiatbilstoš publicity to the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements;
11.3. The European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 of the specific steps needed to implement the project planned by the European regional development fund co-financed activities, as well as the closely related and focused on the promotion of employment.
12. Providing project planned in the application costs with cost duplication for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the project may also be eligible for the implementation of such activities, which it has used to receive foreign funding, financial assistance in the framework of other activities, but the aid has not been sufficient authorities defined in solving this problem.
13. The project is not eligible activities that: 13.1. This provision is not referred to in paragraph 11, does not contribute to this provision referred to in paragraph 2, the objective of the activity and does not correspond to the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European regional development fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999 of the requirements of article 4;
13.2. is not related to the legislation on the operation of the autonomous municipalities set functions and their enforcement.
14. the project eligible indirect costs are: 14.1 with project activities directly related to the publicity costs, consistent with the laws of European Union funds publicity and visual identity claims, not exceeding five percent of the total eligible direct project costs;
14.2. contingencies, not exceeding five percent of the total eligible direct project costs.
15. The project's eligible direct costs are: 15.1 supporting documentation, preparation of project costs (excluding project submission form fill), taken on 24 October 2006, and no more than seven percent of the total direct eligible project costs: 15.1.1. construction, renovation or simplified simplified reconstruction plans, the development of the documentation provided for all project activities;
15.1.2. the audit, inspection or survey costs, if it is a prerequisite for the construction, renovation or simplified simplified reconstruction conception for the development of the documentation;
15.1.3. financial analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis. Feasibility of the development is eligible if it is started before the entry into force of these regulations;
15.1.4. the law on environmental impact assessment for a specific document preparation;
15.2. construction costs: 15.2.1 traffic overpasses, bridges, street or road construction or reconstruction, including rainwater drainage infrastructure construction or reconstruction of the infrastructure of public transport efficiency, including the movement of public transport systems, optimising the fitting and new staging staging construction;
15.2.2. municipal building renovation, reconstruction or completion of new construction, building the functionality required of all public service construction and reconstruction of the connection;
15.2.3. water supply, sewage and municipal sewage collection and disposal, infrastructure construction, the bridge carried traffic, street and road construction or reconstruction project in the territory on the date of submission of the project in accordance with the legislation on public service regulators have received public service requests from specific areas of the owners;
15.2.4. such an underground communications infrastructure reconstruction, or renovation, if you make a project scheduled traffic carried, bridge, street, road infrastructure construction activities, there are public service infrastructure necessary for the risk of deterioration: 15.2.4.1. heating, water supply, municipal sewage and waste water collection and discharge infrastructure rebuilding;
15.2.4.2. gas, electricity and telephony communications infrastructure conversion without increasing its crew capacity;
15.3. the improvement of the territory, up to a maximum of 20 percent of the total direct eligible project costs;
15.4. the project created in the infrastructure development necessary stationary equipment (except production facilities) and the stationary equipment purchase and installation, up to 20 percent of the total direct eligible project costs;
15.5. autoruzraudzīb and building expenses, up to a maximum of three per cent of the total direct eligible project costs;
15.6. land acquisition costs, carried out pursuant to laws and regulations state and local financial resources and wasted effort in the area of prevention, up to 10 percent of the total direct eligible costs, if the land acquisition required project objectives;
15.7. the costs associated with building commissioning;

15.8. the holders of the European Social Fund, not exceeding 10 percent of the total eligible project costs, including the promotion of social inclusion, training and organising a membership, subsidised jobs and practice costs.
16. the costs are eligible if they: 16.1. these provisions required in paragraph 11 of the activities and for the implementation of this provision in paragraph 2 in order to achieve that objective;
16.2. match safe financial management principle: 16.2.1. the principle of economy, who related to resources available within a certain time, in appropriate quantity and the lowest price;
16.2.2. the principle of cost-effectiveness associated with the best relationship between resources employed and results;
16.2.3. principle of effectiveness that is associated with the specific objectives set and achieving the intended results;
16.3. after January 1, 2010, and the idea of the project is a coordinated regional development and local government created the Ministry of Coordination Council, except that rule 15.1. the costs referred to in point.
17. Value added tax payments that are directly tied to a project if the beneficiary cannot recover in the laws on value added tax established, are eligible.
18. the project eligible costs not directly related to the project and shall not exceed two percent of the total project eligible costs are: 18.1. costs of equipment or equipment not referred to in paragraph 15.4. these provisions;
18.2. costs that exceed this rules 14.1, 14.2, 15.1, 15.4, 15.5 15.3.,.,., or 15.6 15.8. referred to the percentage of the eligible cost;
18.3. the accident and resulting in the implementation of the project the value of insurance;
18.4. the audit, except that rule 15.1.2. the costs referred to in (a);
18.5. This provision 15.2.4.2. referred to infrastructure renewal, if its crew capacity is increased after a restore.
19. the following costs shall not be included in the project: 19.1.  costs other than those referred to in this provision 14, 15, 17 and 18;
19.2. costs incurred prior to 1 January 2010, with the exception of those provisions 15.1 the costs referred to in point.
20. The maximum available for the European regional development fund co-financing amount of distribution is: 20.1. Tukums District Municipality – 542 878 lats;
20.2. Ogre municipality-542 878 lats;
20.3. Sigulda district municipality – 407 159 lats;
20.4. Limbaži district municipality – 427 516 lats;
20.5. Dobele district municipality – 452 398 lats;
20.6. Bauska district municipality – 497 638 lats;
20.7. Jelgava district municipality – 497 638 lats;
12.9. Wear of the Government – 380 015 lats;
20.9. Alūksne district municipality – 427 516 lats;
20.10. Award Government-427 516 lats;
20.11. Ludza district municipality – 427 516 lats;
20.12. Krāslava district municipality – 427 516 lats;
20.13. the Preiļi district municipality – 380 015 lats;
20.14. Rēzekne district municipality – 597 166 lats;
20.15. Daugavpils district municipality – 522 520 dollars;
20.16. Ventspils district municipality – 361 919 lats;
20.17. Aizpute municipality municipality – 380 015 lats;
20.18. Grobiņa district municipality – 361 919 dollars.
21. the total eligible costs of the project amount of not less than 100 000 lats.
III. Requirements to the applicant of the project and the project application Project applicant is 22, Limbaži, OGRE, Sigulda, Tukums, Alūksne, prize, Bauska, Dobele, Kraslava, Ludza, Preiļi, Valka, aizpute, Daugavpils, Jelgava, Rezekne, grobiņa and Ventspils district municipality, including its established authority.
23. the project the applicant made a financial analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis under the guidelines laid down by the liaison bodies.
24. the cost effectiveness analysis, the applicant chooses the project cost efficiency best solution, provided that the total project benefits and savings are greater than the project investment and operating costs throughout the project life cycle.
25. The European regional development fund co-financing rate deficit this provision 15.2.3. cost referred to in subparagraph determined according to the "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix 3.5. priorities "environmental infrastructure and environmental friendly energy contributes" UR3.5.1.pas "environmental infrastructure" 3.5.1.1. activity "of the water management infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000" under the Cohesion Fund co-financing rate of water shortage, municipal sewage and waste water collection and disposal costs of infrastructure construction in the national or regional interest Development Center (City) territory.
26. If the project makes this provision 15.2.3. investments referred to infrastructure supported by the implementation of the project is the property of the municipality and can be invested in a municipal corporation or a municipal control of the company's share capital under the laws of State and local government owned capital shares and enterprises, as well as commercial support for control, if the service provider is a public municipal corporation or municipal control of an existing company or leased under the legislation on public procurement and commercial support control, if the public service provides the municipal corporation, local government controlled company or other public service providers. If the project makes this provision referred to in paragraph 15.2.4. investments, ownership of the supported infrastructure does not change.
27. the project applicant project attracts project management personnel, complying with at least the provisions of this annex in 36.2.
28. the project submission form to add to the project application, the municipal development programme and its amendments (if applicable), financial analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis a copy of the electronic medium and accompanying such originals, copies or notarized copies, which is proof of the appropriate authorities of compliance with the original copy: 28.1. financial analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis;

28.2. construction (including public service infrastructure needed for internal wiring and the equipment and the external inženiertīkl, traffic overpasses, bridges, street, road infrastructure equipment) the cost estimate, prepared and approved in accordance with 501 et seq of the LBN-06 "Būvizmaks discovery procedure", as well as other costs (including the fixed installations, equipment and stationary equipment and equipment that is not considered a fixed cost (if applicable)) that includes at least the following information: 28.2.1. Optional product name;
28.2.2. service or the number of units of the goods;
28.2.3. unit price without value added tax and with it;
28.2.4. the total amount, exclusive of value added tax and with it;
28.3. the technical design stage construction plan or simplified renovation or reconstruction plans simplified documentation developed and approved in accordance with the regulations on general provisions on the project planned activities;
28.4. the law on environmental impact assessment of certain documents;
28.5. local authorities a copy of the regulations, the application shall be accompanied, where the local authorities;
28.6. documents proving ownership of the infrastructure facility, which is scheduled to invest: 28.6.1. real estate objects – local ownership by supporting documents – extract from the land register or, failing that, a certificate for being the property of the municipality and State land cadastre service certificate;
28.6.2. other infrastructure assets – for being in the property, the purchase contract or other evidence of ownership;
28.7. If the project is for the provision of subparagraph 15.2.3. investments:. contract 28.7.1 meets business support Control Act the requirements laid down in article 21.1 and concluded with a public service provider for the public service;
28.7.2. technical provisions for the development of the projects specified in the planning and issued būvvald architecture;
28.7.3. public service provider for appropriate legislation on public service regulators public service received a request from the owner of the territory concerned, indicating the applicant's property cadastre number;
17.9. If the project is intended for the provision referred to in paragraph 15.2.4.1. investments: 28.8.1. contracts that meet the Business control law in support of the requirements set out in article 21.1 and concluded with a public service provider for the public service;
28.8.2. certified civil engineer examination of the opinion, which found that the project planned investments in certain areas, it is not possible to avoid this provision referred to in paragraph 15.2.4.1. infrastructure damage;
28.8.3. technical provisions for the development of the projects specified in the planning and issued būvvald architecture;
46.8. If the project is for the provision of subparagraph 15.2.4.2. investments: 28.9.1. certified civil examination opinion, which found that the project planned investments in certain areas, it is not possible to avoid this provision 15.2.4.2. infrastructure damage referred to;
28.9.2. technical provisions for the development of the projects specified in the planning and issued būvvald architecture.
IV. Project application selection 29. Liaison body within two weeks after the project ideas matching the Coordination Council meeting this provision mentioned in paragraph 22 of the draft sent by mail to applicants by registered letter or electronic document under the laws and regulations on electronic document design call for project submissions, determining the project submission deadline, which is not shorter than 90 working days from the date of dispatch of the invitation. The project application selection organized in rounds until the applicants have concluded a draft agreement for the implementation of projects for the whole of these provisions referred to in paragraph 20 of the European regional development fund co-financing.
30. cooperation authority notice of limited project application selection started the cooperation bodies website (URwww.vraa.gov.lv).
31. the applicant shall provide the cooperation Projects the Authority projects and the application of these provisions referred to in paragraph 28 of document in one instance: 31.1. paper form – in person or sent by mail. Documents are presented according to the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document and inserts the sealed container (envelope or box). If the application is sent by mail, at the time the project is considered the day when a project application is transferred to the post office. In the event of a dispute, the applicant demonstrates the fact, when the post passed the post. If the application is submitted in person, at the time the project is considered to be the moment when the representative of the authority responsible has made the mark to the project application for the project;
31.2. the electronic document, according to the laws and regulations governing the circulation of electronic documents. About the project the application time is considered to be the moment when the project submissions sent by email or through the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the applicant demonstrates the fact that the application sent to the project submission deadline. If the cooperation of the authority submits that the application of the project has not been received, so this claim justified.
32. The Evaluation Commission composed of members of the Commission voting status includes two representatives of the responsible authority, three State regional development agency representatives and one representative from the Ministry of transport, Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Ministry of environment and the Ministry of culture.
33. cooperation Authority invited to participate in the evaluation work of the Commission and one representative of the Managing Authority observer status without voting rights.
34. the President of the Commission is collaborating authority driver who is a voting member of the Commission, or the head of the liaison bodies designated official.
35. cooperation Authority public procurement laws regulating the procedures specified in the project application evaluation may invite independent experts.

36. the Commission received project submissions valued under this provision listed in annex 2 of the draft application evaluation criteria.
37. the project submission's compliance with this provision listed in annex 2 of the administrative, compliance and criteria for granting the aid is assessed by the "Yes" (match), "partial match" (provided) and "no" (no matches). The project application of these provisions. 2 compliance with the quality criteria referred to in annex scored, giving a certain number of points.
38. Where the submission, subject to this provision as referred to in annex 2 of the draft application evaluation criteria, does not meet any of the administrative or the eligibility criteria identified as not to be, or not receiving the minimum number of points corresponding to one of the quality criteria, evaluation of the application, the project could not continue.
39. the cooperation of the heads of the authority shall decide on the approval of the project application, if the application project: 24.3 complies with all the rules referred to in annex 2 of the administrative, compliance and supports the award criteria;
24.4. the project is executed in the application of these rules referred to in annex 2 of the minimum quality requirements;
39.3. the application of this provision of the project 2. quality criteria referred to in the annex of assessment is received by at least 18 points.
40. cooperation authority head of project submissions, if approved, subject to the submission of the project need to clarify, according to one of the rules referred to in annex 2 of the administrative, compliance and supports the award criteria, which allows the updating of the project application.
41. The rules referred to in paragraph 40 of the condition can include: 41.1. requirement to provide additional explanation;
25.6. other activities necessary to ensure compliance with the project application, this provision listed in annex 2 of the administrative, compliance and supports the award criteria, which allows the updating of the project application.
42. where these rules 40 and 41 of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 shall affect any other provisions in this annex 2 assessment of compliance with this criterion, the liaison body decision on approval of the application, the project on condition accompanied by appropriate instructions.
43. in paragraph 40 of these provisions in that decision, the conditions contained in a period not exceeding 30 working days from the date of the decision.
44. Cooperation authority takes these rules the decision referred to in paragraph 40 of the conditions contained in the verification and seven working days after the conditions of receiving the dossier sent to the applicant an opinion on draft conditions.
45. If this provision in the decision referred to in paragraph 40 of the conditions are not met or are not met, this provision of the deadline mentioned in paragraph 43, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected.
46. head of liaison bodies shall take a decision on the project, if the rejection of the application: the application of the project not 46.1. one of the provisions referred to in annex 2 of the administrative and eligibility criteria that do not allow updating of the application of the project;
46.2. the project submission does not comply with the provisions of annex 2 of the quality criteria referred to in the minimum requirements.
47. The liaison body shall ensure that the information on the approved project submissions to be posted on the Web site (URwww.vraa.gov.lv).
V. implementation and monitoring of the project 48. cooperation authority agreement for the implementation of the project by the beneficiary of the financing switch according to the regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.
49. The beneficiary within five working days after the conclusion of the agreement shall be submitted to the liaison body of the procurement plan, prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for European Union structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds.
50. the project the applicant within 10 working days after this provision in paragraph 40 of that decision or the rules referred to in paragraph 44 of the receipt of the opinion of the submitting institution for cooperation for the submission of the request for payment schedule, prepared in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the liaison bodies.
51. If the payment schedule for the submission of requests for objective reasons are required to make changes, the beneficiary within five working days from the date when such a need is identified, the institution of cooperation submitted a payment request submission of an updated schedule.
52. If the project is co-financed by the beneficiary of the credit means it within five working days after the conclusion of the project the loan agreement shall be submitted to the liaison body of the notice of loan and received a copy of the loan agreement.
53. If the project applicant within 30 working days of the rule referred to in paragraph 40 of the decision or by the rules referred to in paragraph 44 of the receipt of the opinion of the authority has not appeared to close a cooperation agreement for the implementation of the project, the cooperation agreement is not concluded and the authority shall inform the competent authority.
54. The beneficiary shall ensure the first tender tender not later than three months after the conclusion of the agreement. If, within that period, the first tender has not been announced, the authority shall decide whether the cooperation necessary to terminate the agreement for the implementation of the project.
55. at the conclusion of the cooperation agreement, if it is available in the State budget, on the basis of the beneficiary's written request, provide advance funding for the requested advance payment according to the regulations on the procedures foreseen in the State budget to fund the European Union co-financed the project implementation, as well as make payments and preparation of declarations of expenditure.
56. cooperation authority, providing advance and interim payments shall comply with the condition that the total may not exceed 90 percent of the project to the European regional development fund co-financing and Government co-financing.
57. The beneficiary shall submit a request for payment of the cooperation body, costs copies of supporting documents and project reports according to the terms of the agreement for the implementation of a project deadlines and procedures.

58. cooperation may reduce the funding granted to the project in accordance with the laws governing the order in which the report on the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the implementation of the identified inadequacies, shall take a decision on the use of funding granted and recover the irrelevant.
59. The liaison body shall be reduced on a pro rata basis of funding granted to the project if: 59.1. the actual use of the funds is less than that provided in agreement on the implementation of the project;
59.2. are not implemented in any of the transactions provided for in the agreement on the implementation of the project, but the aim of the project is reached;
59.3. not submitted a financial leverage of the supporting documents;
59.4. payment request by the eligible costs are not proportionate and economically justified;
59.5. the beneficiary has misled the authorities or the liaison body, giving false information;
59.6. financial leverage is not carried out in accordance with legislative requirements in the area of public procurement, as well as if the project has designed this rule 15.2.3 and the investments referred to in paragraph 15.2.4.-in accordance with legislative requirements, the business support area of control.
60. cooperation authority, reviewing the interim or final report, entitled the public procurement regulatory laws in order to call on independent experts to verify the request for payment of the eligible cost specified in compliance and reasonableness.
61. The project up to a maximum of 15 July 2015.
62. cooperation authority controls the funds of not to exceed this provision in paragraph 4, the specific amount of the activity. If the project will reduce the total amount of eligible costs, cooperation on the basis of the authority specified by the European regional development fund co-financing balances, controls the rules referred to in paragraph 20 of the project the applicant the maximum available under the European regional development fund, the amount of the costs of inviting these rules referred to in point 22 of the applicant to submit a draft project submissions in the current round.
63. The beneficiary shall ensure that the eligible expenditure, repayment of which is from the European regional development fund co-financing and national public co-financing funds and the holders of the European Social Fund, as well as the implementation of the project-related revenue, cash flow, assets and liabilities accounting records are identifiable, separate and verifiable.
64. All project-related changes in the beneficiary with the cooperation of the authority.
65. the objectives of the project related changes, this rule 8.3. referred to the implementation of the principles and objectives of the cooperation between the monitoring authority within 10 working days of coordinated with the responsible authority.
66. The beneficiary is directly responsible for the maintenance of the project's results according to the time limit laid down in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 57, paragraph 1. If the project makes this provision 15.2.3 referred to investment and infrastructure projects supported by the project investing municipal corporation or local control of company's share capital, the beneficiary shall ensure that the contract for the provision of the public service is a set of supported infrastructure maintenance period, corresponding to the Council on 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund , The European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 57 (1), and at least until the end of this period the municipality owns more than 50 percent of the share capital of a corporation or company.
67. the funding recipient project in acquire all fixed installations and equipment, as well as the municipal building where the investment is made, at least five years after the implementation of the project shall be insured against natural disasters, third party unlawful acts or accidents cause loss or damage.
68. the competent authority, liaison body and the beneficiary shall keep all the project-related original documents until 2021 December 31, as well as the European Commission and the authorities of the Republic of Latvia access to this documentation.
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky, regional development and local Government Minister d. Staķ of regional development and local government Ministry's proposed version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 14 September 2010 regulations No 843 of regional development and local Government Minister d. Staķ of regional development and local government Ministry's proposed version of annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 14 September 2010 regulations No 843 administrative criteria ranking system-yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 1.
Project submission is prepared in paper form and submitted in person or by mail in a sealed container (envelope or box) or in the electronic form of a document drawn up, filed electronically and it is signed with a secure electronic signature, and confirm with the time stamp.
N 2.
The project application has been submitted to the authorities of cooperation within the time limit set in the invitation.
N 3.
The project applicant is invited to submit a project application.
N 4.
The project application has been submitted in one original.
N 5.
The submitted application is the project cauršūt (caurauklot), where the application is submitted in paper form.
P 6.
All project submissions page is numbered.
P 7.
The project application has been drawn up under the Cabinet of Ministers of 14 September 2010 No. 843 of the provisions of the "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.6.2.1. Appendix" support activity of the County Municipal complex development "(hereinafter-the rules) and all Annex 1 Annex 1 section are filled P 8.
The project application is made in the text.
P 9.
Project application form is attached to all of the provisions laid down in paragraph 28 and the accompanying documents drawn up accordingly.
P 10.
The project is not specified in the application for correction, deletion, addition, deletion, or aizkrāsojum, where the application is submitted in paper form.
P eligibility criteria scoring system – Yes/No

Project eligibility criteria or precizējams2 11. Noraidāms1 design meets the objective of the activity to promote the largest (by population) in the County development centres which are to be integrated and supplemented the total national and regional centres of development, strengthening the competitiveness and the functional link between the development centres and their surrounding areas, according to local development programmes, providing support for economic infrastructure necessary for (natural and physical environment), as well as to organize public service accessibility and mobility of the population.
N 12. Project activities meet the provisions set out in paragraph 11 of the eligible activities.
13. submission of project p is justified, as it will ensure the implementation and monitoring of the project.
P 14. included in the submission of the project eligible and non eligible costs comply with the provisions of 15 and 18 in the eligible and non-eligible costs.
15. in the application of the project, p is the clearly defined target groups-county municipality and surrounding area residents and business operators.
P 16. Project budget includes costs are reasonable and justified, they match the expected period of the project implementation and operation and is calculated by taking into account the expected market price of a given project year.
17. the project application, p financial calculation is accurate and correct arithmetic developed.
P 18. a project of the European regional development fund co-financing shall not exceed the provision laid down in paragraph 5 percentage.
19. in the application of the project, p is the set, and will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the project for at least five years after completion of the project.
P 20. total eligible cost of the project is less than 21 points in a draft of the rules, the applicant set out the total eligible costs of the project.
21. in the application of the project p for the European regional development fund eligible costs not exceeding the provision in draft paragraph 20 the applicant the maximum available under the European regional development fund co-financing percentage.
22. submission of project p planned activities (or part thereof) does not overlap with the activities (or part thereof) intended for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the project, the applicant may be eligible for funding.
N 23 project planned activities comply with the law on the support of business requirements.
24. submission of draft n idea is coordinated regional development and local government created the Ministry of Coordination Council.
N 25. project applicant is designed and approved for the municipal development programme.
26. the applicant Project n planning to implement publicity and information activities according to the legislation of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements.
P 27. has been the project financial analysis, where a project is designed for the income and the project meets the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55 the requirements or cost effectiveness analysis.
N 28. Project cost per unit for the benefit of the provisions of paragraph 24 shall not exceed the scope of the project the maximum cost level.
P 29. Project activities provide for the reduction of maintenance expenditure on infrastructure after the project or project is created or enhanced economic activity required infrastructure.
P PROJECT applicant eligibility criteria ranking system-yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 30. Project the applicant complies with the provisions laid down in point 22 of the project applicant.
N 31. applicant Project is stable and available financial resources.
32. the project applicant p not on financial stabilization process.
P quality ranking system-point scale of project quality criteria, 33.
The project is expected to receive an investment of at least 2 points 33.1.
County development of infrastructure or improving economic activity, as well as with the use of the infrastructure related services creation 33.2 6.
County development of infrastructure or improvement of economic activities for the promotion of 33.3 5.
County development centres to create or improve infrastructure (except 33.1 and 33.2. subparagraph.) as well as with the use of the infrastructure related services to create 4 20.8.
County development centres to create or improve infrastructure (except 33.1 and 33.2.. as referred to in point 2) 33.5.
not met, 33.2, 33.3 33.1 and 33.4. the requirements set out in paragraph 0 34.
The project involves an integrated approach to the Government's Centre for the development of infrastructure development, making connections with municipal development program must be received at least 4 points 34.1.
the project involves an integrated approach into municipal infrastructure development, including the development of local municipality provides the center of competitiveness and functional links with the surrounding areas, providing the association with the approved development agenda municipal 34.2 6.
the project involves an integrated approach into municipal infrastructure development, including the local development of the County down the center of the building, ensuring the competitiveness of the association with the approved development agenda municipal 4 21.3.
34.1 and 34.2 are not complied with. the requirements set out in paragraph 0 35.
The project will be saved in the local existing and create new jobs or will be provided jobs accessibility features must be received at least 2 points in 21.8.
will be saved in the existing and created at least six new jobs 4 35.2.
be saved existing jobs and create one to five new jobs 3 35.3.
will be provided jobs accessibility options or be saved existing jobs, not creating new jobs 2 22.0.
will not be saved in the existing and to create new jobs or not will be provided job opportunities within reach 0 36.
The project management team have the appropriate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical expertise should be received at least 2 points 36.1.

the supervisor shall have higher education and at least three years of work experience in the management of infrastructure projects, and not less than half of the project management team members have higher education and professional knowledge in the field concerned, 36.2 4.
the project manager has a higher education and from one to three years of work experience in the management of infrastructure projects, and not less than half of the project management team members have higher education and professional knowledge in the field concerned 36.3 2.
36.1 and 36.2 are not complied with. the requirements set out in paragraph 0 37.
Project application contains and how reasonable the project complements other projects approved or planned projects that are funded or planned to be financed from other funds of the European Union activities or other financial instruments are not exclusive Criteria 37.1.
the project contains the application and based on complementarity with more than one project or project submission 3 37.2.
the project contains the application and based on complementarity with one project or project submission 2 37.3.
the project is not specified in the application and based on complementarity with projects or project submissions 0 38.
Application of the project project implementation reflect the degree of readiness to receive at least 2 points to 38.1.
the project activities are approved for construction in the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction of a simplified plan, if applicable, and has opened a procurement for project investments in infrastructure 6 38.2.
the project activities are approved for construction in the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction of a simplified plan, if applicable, and prepare documentation for the procurement project investment in infrastructure laid down in 4 23.8.
the project activities are approved for construction in the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction of a simplified plan, if applicable 2 23.9.
not met, and 23.8 23.7 23.7.. the requirements set out in paragraph 0 39.
The project is expected to be implemented must receive at least 1 paragraph 39.1.
24.4 3 to 18 months.
from 19 to 30 months 2 39.3.
from 31 to 36 months 1 24.5.
For more than 36 months 0 criteria on HORIZONTAL priorities 40.
Applicant project eligible costs financing part of the project is larger than the provisions laid down in point 6 of the financing part of the minimum Criteria are not exclusive 40.1.
more than 10 percent 3 40.2.
about six to 10 percent in the 2 25.0.
till 5.99 40.4 per cent 1.
applicant project eligible costs financing part of the project is not greater than the minimum specified financing 0 41.
The project is intended for activities specific to the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities criteria not exclusive 41.1.
the project provides for four and more specific actions for equal opportunities 3 41.2.
the project provides for from one to three specific activities to ensure equal opportunities 2 41.3.
the project does not foresee specific actions for equal opportunities 0 42.
The project will contribute to reducing pollution of the environment or the conservation of the existing situation, there are certain steps the negative impact on the environment for the elimination or reduction of criteria not exclusive 42.1.
the project will contribute to reducing pollution of the environment or the conservation of the existing situation, there are certain steps the negative impact on the environment for the elimination or reduction of 42.2 2.
the project will not promote environmental pollution mitigation or conservation of the existing situation, there is no specific negative impacts on the environment for the elimination or reduction of 0 43.
The project contributes to the development of the information society, providing for the establishment of the electronic services or improvement of criteria not exclusive 43.1.
the project involves the creation of electronic services or improvement of 2 43.2.
the project provides information and communication equipment 1 43.3.
the project provides electronic services or the establishment or enhancement of information and communication equipment in total-42 rating 0 low 18 points in case the application is rejected for the project.

The criterion for the award of aid evaluation system-yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 44.
Application of the project planned activities (project or part of it) does not overlap with the activities (or part of a project), which is designed for foreign financial aid within the framework of activities.
P notes.
1 if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected.
2 If the rating is negative, can make a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant to ensure compliance with the laws and the criteria for the activities of the implementation deadline).
Regional development and local Government Minister d.-Staķ