Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 897 Riga 2010. on 21 September (pr. No 48 27) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 March 2008. Regulations No. 212 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "3.3.1.1. activity" Supplement to the TEN-T road network improvements "issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 25 March 2008. Regulations No. 212" rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" 3.3.1.1. activity "Supplement to the TEN-T road network improvements" (Latvian journal in 2008, 54 no; 2009, 35, 83 no; 2010, 67 no) the following amendments: 1. Replace the text, the words "the second project application selection round" with the words "second and subsequent project application selection round".
2. Add to 6.1 points in the second and third sentence as follows: "the maximum amount of co-financing from the Cohesion Fund for one project from the project total eligible costs is the preceding project selection round, the remaining amount of co-financing from the Cohesion Fund. Maximum cohesion fund co-financing are 85 percent of the total Cohesion Fund total eligible cost of the project. "
3. Replace paragraph 29, first sentence, the words "quality criteria" with the words "quality criteria".
4. To make the title of Chapter VII, the following wording: "VII. Closing questions".
5. Supplement with 37 and 38 as follows: "37. Third and future project application selection round projects approved this rule 11.13., 11.18. and 11.21. the costs referred to in point total is attributable to 10 percent from the originally approved project total eligible costs.
38. in paragraph 11 of these regulations, the costs of the third and subsequent project application selection rounds cannot be applied for funding from the Cohesion Fund and the State budget, if they occur, by establishing working relationship. "
6. To make the new version of annex 2 (annex 1).
7. To make the new version of annex 3 (annex 2).
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky traffic Minister k. Gerhards traffic Ministry submitted the annex 1 Cabinet 21 September 2010 the regulations no 897 "annex 2 Cabinet of 25 March 2008. Regulations No 212 traffic Minister k. Gerhard annex 2 Cabinet 21 September 2010 the regulations no 897" annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 March 2008. Regulations No 212 Project submission evaluation criteria 1. Administrative criteria evaluation system Criteria the impact on decision making (P * N **) Yes/No 1.1.
The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 1.2.
The project applicant is invited to submit a project application N 1.3.
Project submission prepared into P 1.4.
Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 1.5.
One project has been submitted to the original application and one copy (if the application is not filed in electronic form of a document) N 1.6.
The project submission complies with the regulations laid down in the document preparation and design requirements P 1.7.
The project application has been drawn up according to the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activities specified in the project application form N 1.8.
The project application is fully completed and is attached to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activities set out in annex P 1.9.
Application of the project financing plan is no arithmetic errors and correctly completed P 1.10.
The project application is signed by the project paraksttiesīg of the applicant party or its authorized person (is connected to the power card) N 1.11.
The project's eligible cost specified in the application to the positions correspond to the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activities set out the eligible costs and the amount of P 1.12.
The required co-financing from the Cohesion Fund and the national fund size is calculated the arithmetic properly P 1.13.
Required for the project under the Cohesion Fund co-financing shall not exceed the proportion of the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity stated maximum amount P 2. eligibility criteria evaluation system be rejected or Yes/No to be 2.1.
The project complies with the regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity specified in the activity purpose N 2.2.
Project management staff have appropriate experience and project management capacity, professional and technical knowledge. Project application describes the project management, implementation and monitoring of the scheme, and it required resources (in the number of staff involved, qualifications and responsibilities, the available material and technical base) N 2.3.
The project has made a cost-benefit analysis N 2.4.
Project cost-benefit analysis is used in the social discount rate – 5.5 percent N 2.5.
The project's economic net present value (ENPV) is greater than zero N 2.6.
The project's economic rate of return (ERR) is more than 5.5 percent N 2.7.
The project is carried out sensitivity and risk analysis N 2.8.
The project will be completed by 31 august 2015 N 2.9.
The project is designed for the stage road, which is located in the TEN-T road network N 2.10.
The minimum project total eligible costs are at least 1 000 000 lats (EUR 1 422 872) N 2.11.
The project budget includes expenditure corresponds to the average of the market prices and construction are required to achieve the project's results and the implementation of planned activities P 2.12.
If the project will be implemented, the project will ensure the maximum period contained in the vehicle driving axle load 11.5 tonnes and maximum uncontrolled vehicle weighing 44 tons N 2.13.
The project contained in the country's main highway pavement condition of the period to the date of submission of the project is evaluated with "satisfactory", "bad" or "very bad", through the national joint stock company "Latvian state roads" quality control procedure "Paved of blanket inspection" N 2.14.
The project planned publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the requirements of P 2.15.
The project planned in the application monitoring indicators are clearly defined and measurable N 2.16.
The project is not and has not been financed or co-financed from other Union financial sources as well as State and local budgets, as well as project planned activities do not overlap with the activities financed by other structural funds of European Union activities and of other financial instruments within N 2.17.
Infrastructure, which involves making the investment, the project is located the property of the applicant or the applicant has entered into an agreement with the owner of the land under the building Act P 2.18.
Ensuring the sustainability of the project results – ensure object maintenance 20 years after completion of the project N 3. Criteria of quality evaluation system of notes points 3.1.
The project's economic rate of return (ERR) points are awarded according to the ERR value 3.2 project implementation time: 3.2.1 3.2.2.3 to 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 3.2.3. more than 2 years 1 3.3. project maturity: 3.3.1. developed the technical design and procurement documentation prepared 3 3.3.2. developed technical projects in the 3.3.3. crafted sketch 2 project 1 3.3.4. technical project and the sketch project has 0 3.4. Designing of construction , will be taken into account in the construction of the regulatory laws and requirements regarding accessibility for people with functional disabilities, and are included in the project in addition to the specific measures for the promotion of accessibility for people with functional disabilities (such as terrain surface, contrasting colour at the level of the Exchange, traffic lights, guardrails, equipped with a sound signal, bus platform tilted uzbrauktuvj installation) 1 developing projects, will be taken into account in the construction of laws framework requirements but the project is not intended for specific measures for the promotion of accessibility for people with functional disabilities 0 3.5. Implementation of the project, will prevent or reduce negative impacts on the quality of the environment: 3.5.1 3.5.2 2 directly indirectly 1 3.5.3. let 0 4. Funding criteria ranking system yes/no notes 4.1.
If the application complies with this annex 1.1., 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.7, 1.10, 2.1., 2.2., 2.3., 2.4., 2.5., 2.6., 2.7., 2.8., 2.9, 2.10, 2.12, 2.13, 2.15, 2.16 and 2.18. evaluation criteria laid down in point, 3.1., 3.2., 3.3., 3.4 and 3.5. evaluation criteria specified in the received a total of at least seven points, then the project submissions, listing in descending order, starting with the most points winning the project application the project application selection round application is sufficient funding for the project N notes.
1. If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition.

2. If the criteria are not met, the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project. "
Traffic Minister k. Gerhard