Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 1187 Riga 2010 December 28 (Mon. No 75 1) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 25 November 2008 No. 962 "provisions of the rules on" operational programme human resources and employment "1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt" Supplement to support local capacity-building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures "issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 25 November 2008 No. 962" provisions of the rules on "operational programme human resources and employment" 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt "Supplement to support local capacity-building policies of the European Union instruments and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures "(Latvian journal, 2008, no. 192; 2009, nr. 191, 59 no; 2010) the following amendments: 1. Make paragraph 6 by the following:" 6. at the time of implementation of Apakšaktivitāt unveiled the project application selection occurs at least three times. First open the project application selection issued in 2009, and available funding is $590 355. The second open project application selection announces the 2010 4th quarter, and the available funding is 545 000 lats. The third open project application selection available funding is the funding remaining apakšaktivitāt. "
2. Make the following point 14: "14. This part of the planning of the apakšaktivitāt region, County and city authorities of the Republic shall not be eligible for financing such activities or results, which funded 2004-2006 programming period, the grant scheme" technical assistance to non-governmental organizations and local governments to strengthen the capacity of the European Social Fund measures ", as well as the apakšaktivitāt and the" operational programme human resources and employment "1.5.3.1. activity" Professional Association of planning regions , cities and provinces "within."
3. Supplement with 22.1 points as follows: 22.1 project can "include the following beneficiaries of this provision organised 22.5. measures referred to in paragraph: 1. internet homepage 22.1 escalation;
22.1.2 publications in the media;
22.1 3. informative measures for dissemination of the project results (presentations, seminars, conferences), up to five percent of that rule 23.2. and 23.3. referred to cost totals. "
4. Express 23.1 and 23.2. section following.: "23.1. indirect costs of the project, applying the Cabinet set a constant rate: 23.1.1. project management personnel remuneration costs;
23.1.2. work equipment rental costs;
23.1.3. transport costs (fuel, vehicle hire, purchase of transport services, the use of public transport);
23.1.4. space rental and lease costs;
23.1.5. premises management costs (heating, electricity, management services, water supply);
23.1.6. the Office and the Office supply costs;
23.1.7. internet, postal and telecommunications costs;
23.1.8. business trip or travel costs;
23.2. logistical and equipment costs, inventory costs, implementation of specific activities of the project (one unit value of not more than 150 dollars, and its lifetime is less than a year); ".
5. Express 23.3.12. and section follows 23.4. "this rule 22.1 23.3.12. referred to the information and publicity measures;
23.4. contingencies, an amount not exceeding five percent of this rule 23.2. and 23.3. referred to cost totals. "
6. Supplement with 16.7. subparagraph by the following: "project submission and 26.8. supporting the preparation of the dossier."
7. Make the third paragraph 31 the following sentence: "the project submissions valued, if not received by the specified deadline."
8. Delete 32.4. section.
9. Make the following paragraph in 34.1: "34.1. paper form in one copy. Application of the project prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document; "
10. Make an introductory paragraph 35 as follows: ' 35. Paper submitted project applications project is added to the electronic version of the application (electronic media). Project applicant project application electronic versions of the paper submitted to the compliance with the original. The media noted the following: ".
11. Put 36. the first sentence as follows: "If the project application submitted in paper form, along with the electronic version of the application (electronic media) place the sealed envelope."
12. Express 38 as follows: "38. cooperation authority registers the project application submission day. After the expiry of the time limit for submitting liaison body opens the project application, the identification number and the period of five working days by post proof of receipt of the application for the project. "
13. Delete 28.2. section.
14. Delete 45.8.4..
15. Express and 45.12. subparagraph 45.11. by the following: "total eligible costs 45.11. amount of not less than 1000 litres and not more than 25 000 lats according to paragraph 18 of these regulations;
45.12. project estimated eligible costs complies with that provision, 23.1.3 and 22.1 23.4. in point cost limitations; ".
16. Make the following paragraph in 46.3: "46.3. the applicant and the project partner (if applicable) have not previously received funding from the structural funds of the European Union analogue activities or results in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 14;".
17. Express 47.1.5.2. subparagraph as follows: "47.1.5.2. is the project supported awareness-raising of the population on the policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures;".
18. Express 47.1.10. subparagraph as follows: "47.1.10." or in the project planned a publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and are appropriate to the activities planned in the project and regulations for European Union funds publicity and visual identity requirements; ".
19. Express 47.3.2. subparagraph as follows: "47.3.2. project budget costs comply with the average market prices of the application the project year;".
20. Express 47.4.1. subparagraph as follows: "47.4.1. area development index is less than or equal to 0;".
21. Put the following section 50.2.: "50.2. compliance with this provision 47.1.5.2 in this criterion: 0-project not supported awareness-raising of the population on the policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures, 3 – informative or educational materials in electronic or video form, available on CDs or USB interface bus memory devices (or other available CDs or bus USB interface storage devices) 5 – informative or educational materials in electronic or video form, freely available online, banner's homepage (or other available freely online). "
22. Make the following point 51.1.: "assessment of conformity with the 51.1. This provision 47.4.1. and 47.4.3. the criteria referred to in points earned are multiplied by a factor of 5;".
23. The deletion of 51.3. section.
24. Replace 52.1 in the number "39" with the number "43".
25. Replace the 52.2 in the number "18" with the number "20".
26. Express 53 by the following: "53. If the project is found, the application will not match anything any of these rules, 45.2 45.1 45.3 45.5,.,.,.,., 28.3 28.4 28.5 28.5.,.,.,., 45.11 45.13 45.10, 46.3 46.4 46.1., and the criteria referred to in rule 52.1 or this, or in 52.2.52.3 said conditions, the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends the application of the project should be rejected. "
27. Express 57 and 58 of the point as follows: "the Commission draft notice 57. driven approval or approval with conditions, except where it is established that any of the provisions referred to in paragraph 53 of the cases, or where the application does not have enough in the public the project announced the selection of available funding application (these rules 29.2).
58. the Commission's application of the project approval Guide, if you need clarification of this provision, 46.2, 45.12.47.1.7. or 47.3. criteria referred to in subparagraph under paragraph 62 of these rules. "
28. Make 62 the following: "62. Decision on approval of the application, the project on condition the liaison body shall indicate in the application the project details. These updates can include: 62.1. project scheduled updating of the eligible costs under this rule 22.1 and 23.1.3, 23.4. in point cost restrictions according to the criteria referred to in paragraph 45.12. the assessment expressed in the instructions;
62.2. provision for tax and the State social insurance compulsory contribution to the debt before the conclusion of the contract under this rule 46.2. criteria of assessment referred to in the instructions;

38.7. planning of project activities under this provision clarifying 47.1.7. criteria referred to in the instructions in the evaluation (time schedule changes, up to the time of the planned project, the Division of activities on or off);
38.8. clarification of project budgets according to this provision, the criteria referred to in paragraph 47.3. the assessment expressed in the instructions (cost reduction or compliance arithmetical), in so far as it does not affect the maximum total amount of the eligible cost for a single project pursuant to this provision, as well as paragraph 18 of these terms, 23.1.3 and 22.1 23.4. restrictions referred to. "
29. the express section 64.2. the following wording: "64.2. If an opinion is negative or if the applicant has not provided a draft decision the conditions contained in these rules the time limit specified in paragraph 63, the project application is considered to have been rejected."
30. Make 66 as follows: "66. cooperation authority decision on the rejection of the application for the project include information on the reasons for the rejection of the application."
31. Make annex 1 as follows: "1. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers of 25 November 2008 regulations no 962 32. Make annex 2 as follows:" annex 2 Cabinet of 25 November 2008 regulations no 962 project submission evaluation criteria of the operational programme number and name 1.
Human resources and employment priority number and name 1.5.
Administrative capacity measures the number and name 1.5.2.
Human resources capacity building activity number and name 1.5.2.2.
The social partners, non-governmental organizations and local government capacity building number and name of Apakšaktivitāt 1.5.2.2.3.
Support for local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures of the project application selection type open project application selection responsible authority public registry 1. quality criteria (point scale from 1 to 5:1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory/neutral, 4-good, 5 very good) system for rating scale Point 1.1. justification for the application of the project evaluation criteria the maximum number – 65 points 1. Extent to which the project will contribute to the implementation of the 1.5.2.2.3. "apakšaktivitāt support for local capacity-building, the European The policy instruments of the Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures "target group participation in the structural funds of the European Union in the implementation of the measures financed by the European Union's structural funds and management processes 5 x 2 2. to what extent the project will address the 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt" support for local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures "target group needs 5 x 2 3. Extent to which the project provides a complex approach to the needs of the target group in the project target 5 4. numerical evaluation of investment Projects 5 5. horizontal priorities: 5.1 or project is direct or indirect positive impact on equal opportunities horizontal priority: 5 5.1.1 project has a direct positive effect (5 points) 5.1.2. project has an immediate positive impact (3 points) 5.1.3. project does not affect this area (0) 5.2 project supported awareness-raising of the population on the policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures in at least one of the ways 5.2.1. informational or 5 teaching material in electronic or video form, freely available online, banner's homepage (or other, freely available online) (5 points) 5.2.2. informational or instructional material in electronic or video form, available on CDs or USB interface bus memory devices (or other available CDs or bus USB interface storage devices) (3 points) 5.2.3. the project not supported awareness-raising of the population on the policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures (0) How logical is 6. the overall structure of the project (project section of cross compliance and the additionality) 5 7. evaluation of project activities (activity statement, the need for activities and compliance with the project's objectives and expected results, schedules, assessment) 5 P * 8. project sustainability assessment (results of the project in financial, institutional and political sustainability) 5 9. at application or project outcome indicators or planned results indicators contribute to the achievement of such surveillance indicators: outcome indicator 5 9.1-number of supported local 54 51% (or base value in 2006 – 40 or 7.6% in 2009, a score of 30 or 28%)
 9.2. the result indicator – the number of municipalities participating in the European Union's structural fund measures,-105 or 100% of the total number of municipalities (the base value in 2006-235 45% goal or in 2009-50, or 47%)
 10. Does the project planned a publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and is planned in the project activities and the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the requirements 5 the evaluation of compliance If this annex 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8, 9 and 10 in paragraph criterion received less than 43 points, the submissions rejected 1.2. Project implementation capacity evaluation criteria the maximum 30 points 11. project administration experience of staff involved in the project management
 5 12 applicant and project staff involved in the implementation of the project's technical and professional capacity (project staff experience and knowledge 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt "support local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures" in scope) 5 13. Project implementation logistics security planning application for the project 5 14. the functions and responsibilities of the project distribution is appropriate (clearly defined functions and responsibilities among the institutions involved in the administration of the project and the staff involved in the , functions and duties are divided according to the competency and experience in the application of the project) 5 15. intended project management and supervisory mechanism is adequate (management, control, monitoring and evaluation of quality control mechanisms) 5 16. Project implementation involved the choice of partners is based (specified in the planned cooperation model; the role of the partners defined according to its competence and experience) 5 If the project partners are not involved, the criteria referred to in paragraph 16 of the rating is 3 points if the assessment of compliance with this annex 11. , 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of this criterion received fewer than 20 points, the submissions rejected submission of draft budget 1.3 evaluation criteria the maximum 15 points 17. project application for costs is reasonable and necessary to the project's objectives and results and the implementation of activities 5 P 18. project budgeted cost is according to the average market prices of the project application in the year of 5 P 19. The cost of the project is commensurate with the expected results of the project 5 P if the assessment of compliance with this annex 17. , 18 and 19 above criterion received less than 10 points, the submissions rejected 1.4. Specific quality evaluation criteria project 0/1 application-specific quality evaluation criteria evaluated to 0 points if the criterion is not met, and with 1 point, if the criteria is met. Quality evaluation criteria shall be multiplied by the factor of 5 and a maximum of 10-20 point 20. Territory development index is less than or equal to 0 1 x 5 21. project application is intended for the use of the project results in particular from the European Social Fund funded the event 1 x 10 22. a project is being implemented in cooperation with other municipalities or planning regions 1 x 5 2. eligibility criteria Yes/No 23. applicant and Project partner or partner (if applicable) is a planning region , district or city pašvaldība1 Republic Yes/No N ** 24. applicant and Project cooperation partner or partners (if applicable) date of the project is not a tax debt and the State social insurance compulsory contribution debt yes/no P 25.

The project applicant and partner (if applicable) have not previously received funding from the structural funds of the European Union analogue activities or results sasniegšanai2 Yes/No N 26. project submission complies with the specific objective of getting active and quality participation of local policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures N If yes/no rating of compliance with any of the 23 of this annex. , 25 or 26. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 is negative, the project submission rejected 3. Administrative criteria Yes/No 27. project application is filled in text (if applicable) Yes/No 28. N. project application is filled in Latvian language Yes/No N 29. project application is fully completed (yes/no) N 30. submission of the project the original is cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable) Yes/No N 31. project application has been drawn up according to the provisions of the Cabinet of 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt "support local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and the other foreign financial assistance co-financed projects and measures to the implementation of the project specific "submission form for Yes/No N 32. project application is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer or authorized person Yes/No N 33. project application is accompanied by all the Cabinet regulations on 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt" support local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance co-financed projects and the implementation of measures for the implementation of the set "attachments : 33.1. the project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of dzīvesgait (CV) Yes/No N 33.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable) Yes/No N 33.3. mandate of supporting documents (if applicable) Yes/No N 34. project financial statement is made in the national currency (yes/no) N 35. eligible expenditure of the project comply with the regulations of the Cabinet of 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt "support local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures" provided for the implementation of eligible costs N yes/no total 36. the amount of the eligible cost not less than 1000 litres and not more than 25 000 lats Yes/No N 37. Project estimated eligible costs comply with the regulations of the Cabinet of 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt "support local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures" implemented cost limits laid down yes/no P 38. Project implementation period is not less than three months and not more than 10 months N If yes/no rating of compliance with any of the 27. , 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 or 38. criteria referred to in paragraph is negative, the project submission rejected notes.
1. the applicant for a project can be only municipalities, established under the statutory local government administrative territorial breakdown.
2. in the application of the criteria will be taken into account in the projects and partners of the applicant (if applicable) projects that have received support in the 2004-2006 programming period, the grant scheme "technical assistance to non-governmental organizations and local government capacity building in European Social Fund measures", as well as support for the 2007 – 2013 programming period 1.5.2.2.3. apakšaktivitāt "support local capacity building in policy instruments of the European Union and other foreign financial assistance and projects co-financed measures" and "activity specialists 1.5.3.1. attraction planning regions , cities and provinces ", to avoid the risk of double financing.
3. P-a decision on project approval with conditions.
4. ** N – if you received a negative assessment, project submissions rejected. "
The Prime Minister, regional development and local Government Minister v. dombrovsky Finance Minister a. Wolf