Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 53 in 2011 (January 18. 5. § 12) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 July 2008 the Regulation No 606 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "in addition to the activity of water management" 3.4.1.1. infrastructure development localities with a population of up to 2000 "issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do Cabinet of 28 July 2008 the Regulation No 606" rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" in addition to the activity of water management "3.4.1.1. infrastructure development localities with a population of up to 2000" (Latvian journal , 2008, no. 131; 2009, 6, 38, 135, 165. no; 2010, 45, 126 No.) the following amendments: 1. Replace the words "in the text of the provisions of the Ministry of the environment" (fold) with the words "the protection of the environment and regional development Ministry" (fold).
2. Express 11.1. subparagraph by the following: "supporting the project application 11.1 documentation preparation costs (feasibility, related escalation, with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs), development projects and related costs, as well as būvekspertīz autoruzraudzīb and building costs, but not more than 10 percent of the project's planned application total eligible costs".
3. Delete paragraph 11.2.
4. Express 11.3., 11.4 and 11.5. subparagraph such.: "11.3. construction costs, including an appropriate object operation, dismantling costs, if this object location infrastructure project is economically and technically justified;
11.4. Special water management techniques (vakuummašīn) supply costs;
11.5. the publicity expenses, if the relevant publicity measures shall not exceed the minimum requirements set by the laws and regulations of the European Union fund co-financed project publicity and visual identity requirements; ".
5. Supplement with 11.7. subparagraph by the following: "7.3. electricity reconstruction or construction costs (of trunk lines to the project izbūvējam-infrastructure)."
6. To delete the numbers "in paragraph 11.1 11.2." and "11.4.".
7. Express section 13.1. by the following: "13.1. project preparation of the documentation supporting the application costs (feasibility, related escalation, with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs), the development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz and autoruzraudzīb and building costs that exceed 10 percent of the project's planned application total eligible costs".
8. Delete paragraph 13.2.
9. Express 13.5 section as follows: "13.5. electricity reconstruction or construction costs that exceeds this rule 11.7. the costs referred to in (a);".
10. Make a paragraph 29 by the following: "29. Project applicant project application (annex 3) prepared according to the rules referred to in annex 4 of the draft application evaluation criteria."
11. Delete paragraph 30.
12. Delete paragraph 40.
13. paragraph 41 be expressed as follows: "41. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 25.5. first project submissions valued in conformity with this provision of the annex 4, 44, 45, 46, 47 and 48 above administrative criteria. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
41.2. application where this rule 41.1. in the criteria referred to in (a) evaluates to "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 4, 14, 15, 16, 17, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 51, 52, 53, 54 and 55. criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
41.3. If the application of these rules in the criteria referred to in paragraph 25.6. evaluates to "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 30, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 39, 49, 50 and 56 criteria referred to in paragraph and quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 39. If the application does not meet the quality evaluation criteria according to that rule 39.1. (a) applications of valuation of the project did not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
25.7. If the project application meets the quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of section 39.1, project submissions. also according to annex 4 to these regulations 57 and 58 of the above criterion. "
14. Make the following paragraph in 43.1: "it meets this rule 43.1. Annex 4, mentioned in the administrative, compliance and quality criteria;".
15. Express section 44.2. the following wording: "to clarify this rule 44.2. Annex 4, paragraph 56 of the above documents presented;".
16. Make the following subparagraphs 27.8. "to clarify the project 27.8. schedule according to the planned project activity (annex 4, paragraph 23).
17. Make the following subparagraphs 44.10.: "44.10. refine the planned publicity and visual identity measures (annex 4, paragraph 32);".
18. To supplement the provisions of this subparagraph with 44.12.: "44.12. ensure tax payment under this provision of the annex referred to in paragraph 39 of the criterion."
19. Supplement with 63 as follows: "these provisions 11.1.63. and 13.1. subparagraph is applicable for the fourth and subsequent project application selection rounds."
20. Make annex 4 by the following: "4. in the annex to Cabinet of Ministers of 28 July 2008. Regulations No 577 Project submission evaluation form no PO box
Assessment criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1.
The project planned for the launch of preparedness activities: must obtain at least 1 point 1.1.
the project is ready to start (a list of the works to be carried out is not prepared or not prepared qualitatively) 0 1.2.
the project is ready for the launch of the Earth (is prepared and based on the list of the works to be carried out, the purchase documentation not prepared) 1 1.3.

the project is ready for the launch of the medium (is ready and reasonable list of works to prepare the technical documentation for the procurement project development or contracted technical project development) 3 1.4.
the project has a high readiness to start (the accepted technical projects in the works, prepared for the technical specifications of the procurement) 5 2.
The project risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost growth: obtain at least 1 paragraph 2.1.
the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment 0 2.2.
project risk assessment in the application was made, the plan of measures to prevent the risk identified is not developed or not developed completely 1 2.3.
the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, the risk identified in the plan of measures for the elimination or reduction of incompletely developed 2 2.4.
the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 3.
Project submission is analyzed for possible alternatives (financial, technological, technical solution): obtain at least 1 paragraph 3.1.
alternative analysis has not been carried out 0 3.2.
analysis of alternatives performed for only one of the parameters 1 3.3.
an alternative analysis is carried out based on numeric calculations and justify the proposed alternatives 2 3.4.
an alternative analysis is carried out based on numeric calculations and justify the proposed alternatives, and selected the alternative with the lowest cost 3 4.
The cost of return indicators (population, which as a result of the implementation of the project will improve water quality and provide access to the original total cost): note. The average project application selection round costs of return indicators calculation for project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria – cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions, the number of Criteria gives extra points 4.1.
project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 percent 1 4.2.
project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference between 10 and 20 percent 2 4.3.
project cost estimate of return is equal to the average of the calculated or 10 percent (not including) it exceeds, or about 10 percent (not including) less than the project application selection round costs of return indicators 3 4.4.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference between 10 and 20 percent 4 4.5.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 percent 5 5.
Long term investment rating system of water management by project implementation: must obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1.
not done an assessment on the planned long-term investments or long-term investments planned for the period up to 1 year (not including) 0 5.2.
long-term investments are planned for the period from 1 to 5 years (not including) 1 5.3.
long-term investments are planned for the period from 5 to 10 years 2 5.4.
long-term investments are planned for the period exceeding 10 years 3 6.
After the implementation of the project provided legislation for water management services (water supply or sewage) quality: must obtain at least 1 paragraph 6.1.
less than 50 percent of the population of the locality 0 6.2.
from 50 to 60 percent (not including) a locality of population 1 6.3.
from 60 to 75 percent (not including) the population of the locality 2 6.4.
from 75 to 90 percent (not including) the inhabitants of the locality 3 6.5.
between 90 and 95 percent (not including) the inhabitants of the locality 4 6.6.
from 95 to 100 percent of the locality's population 5 7.
The importance of the project for the development of the territory: the criterion gives extra points to 7.1.
as a result of the implementation of the project is planned to improve the water quality of service or availability in a built-up area with a population of less than 500 1 7.2.
as a result of the implementation of the project is planned to improve the water quality of service or availability in a built-up area with a population of 501 to 1000 3 7.3.
as a result of the implementation of the project is planned to improve the water quality of service or availability in a built-up area with population from 1001 to 2000 5 8.
The municipality, which will be implemented in the territory of the water management infrastructure development project, has been awarded the environmental management and audit system (EMAS) certification: Criteria gives extra points 8.1.
environmental management and audit system (EMAS) certificate is assigned 0 8.2.
environmental management and audit system (EMAS) certification is granted 1 1.1. criteria for the assessment of horizontal priorities points 9.
The intensity of the support requested.
Reducing the aid intensity for the two percentage points from the maximum aid intensity under the financial analysis, the rating is increased by one point.
If the aid intensity is reduced by more than 10 percentage points, are assigned a maximum rating of 0-5 Criteria gives additional points 10.
The project's impact on the risk of water-water containing nutrients load due to the element of risk by 2015 does not achieve good water quality (sustainable development): the criterion gives additional points 10.1.
There are no positive impact on the risk of water 0 10.2.
have a positive impact on the potential risk of water objects, 10.3 3.
have a positive impact on the risk of water 5 11.
The implementation of the project have a positive impact on specially protected natural areas (sustainable development): the criterion gives extra points to 11.1.
There are no positive effect 0 11.2.
has a positive impact 5 12.
The project plans to build or reconstruct the sewage treatment equipment (sustainable development): the criterion gives additional points 12.1.

the project is designed for sewage treatment plant construction or reconstruction 0 12.2.
the project plans to build or reconstruct the sewage treatment facilities which meet the regional environmental regulatory requirements, but they are worn and ineffective 3 12.3.
the project plans to build or reconstruct the sewage treatment equipment which does not comply with the regional environmental regulatory requirements, or no sewage treatment plant 5 13.
The project resulted in planned legislation requirements, the quality of the waste water treatment and drinking water quality (sustainable development): the criterion gives extra points to 13.1.
the project is not scheduled for the requirements of the laws under the quality of waste water treatment and drinking water quality to 0 13.2.
the project plans to provide legislative requirements for drinking water quality or waste water treatment quality 3 13.3.
the project plans to provide legislative requirements for drinking water quality and wastewater purification quality 5 13.4.
the project planned for one component of water management (water or waste water collection and treatment), which ensure the legislative requirements for drinking water quality and wastewater purification quality 5 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No/NA 14.
The population of the locality does not exceed 2000 N 15.
If the locality of a population of less than 200 is the project planned a separate object (for example, school) with a separate water supply and sewage system, the project provided in the application project justification the risk of environmental pollution, public health risks or benefits of regional development (attached to the opinion of the competent institution) N (NA) 16.
The project submission complies with the purpose of the activity-water supply and sewage collection and treatment quality improvement and expansion of services, ensuring high-quality living environment, reducing environmental pollution and eutrophication of the water body, as well as promoting water resources and rational use of energy N 17.
Application of the project included in the eligible operations fall into at least one of the activities eligible activities: N 17.1.
high quality drinking water preparation and supply of water resources protection and 17.2.
with the communal waste water discharged to the environment pollution reduction of 17.3.
laid down in the legislation for water quality of service indicators for water management services under the provision of 18.
The project's eligible costs included in the submissions comply with the eligible costs of the activity: P 18.1.
technical feasibility, the related escalation, with the environmental impact assessment documentation related to development costs, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz and autoruzraudzīb and building costs, but not more than 10 percent of the estimated total of the project application in the eligible costs, if such costs for 18.2.
the cost of the works and 18.3.
the cost of the supply contracts, including the acquisition of technological equipment, Assembly and adjustment costs, where provided in the application project 18.4.
the cost of the publicity measures 18.5.
value added tax costs 19.
Application of the project not included in the eligible costs correspond to activities not eligible costs 20 P.
The maximum eligible cost of the project does not exceed 351402 lats P 21.
The State budget financing is 10 percent of the project's planned application total eligible costs, local government funding, at least five percent of the planned project total eligible costs (criteria applies to the first project application selection round of project submissions) P (NA) 22.
Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 22.1.
are the technical characteristics of the activities to be 22.2.
results and outcomes specified indicators, and they meet the purpose of the activity 22.3.
specify actions for the positioning of the project implementation in the territory of 22.4.
specify the action to be taken in economic benefits 22.5.
Specifies the action to perform qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits 22.6.
Specifies the action to perform qualitative and quantitative contribution to the European Union and the Republic of Latvia on the implementation of the requirements of environmental protection and water management area 14.1.
for the polluter-pays principle ", the project 23.
Time schedule of the project comply with the planned project activities P 24.
Project information provided in the application confirms that the project applicant will ensure the sustainability of the project results: N 15.0.
have the appropriate institutional structure of 24.2.
are appropriate to the planned project results in operating the infrastructure built and maintenance costs of 24.3.
It is planned according to the tariff policy that will provide the required operating and development expenditure (if taken loan-repayment of the loan also) 24.4.
is or will be available for staff to ensure the implementation of the project according to the fixed assets resulting from the operation of 25.
The project specified in the application for works and supply of equipment (for example, network, infrastructure, equipment supplied) meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed project objectives N 26.
Project financial analysis carried out pursuant to: N 26.1.
the real social discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 26.2.
the real financial discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 26.3.
the appropriate conversion factor scores 26.4.
appropriate medium and long-term forecasts for 27.
Project financial analysis confirms the financial stability of the project N 28.
Requested by the European regional development fund co-financing aid intensity based on project financial analysis N (NA) 29.
The project budget includes cost: N 29.1.
include all project costs required for the positions of 29.2.
are in accordance with the statement of work. 3.

are proportionate and justified, clearly stated the assumptions for the calculation of the cost of 29.4.
It is directly necessary for the implementation of the project of 29.5.
meet the projected average market prices during the half-year before the draft submission notification of selection round 30.
Project cash flow forecast: P 30.1.
displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 30.2.
is adequate for planned timetable 30.3.
the project has the appropriate financial framework 31.
The project planned in the application project implementation and human resources ensure planned legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries: P 31.1.
Project administrative (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) control of 31.2.
project finance (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) management 31.3.
the technical project (such as the reconciliation of design and construction, work progress reports, and report preparation) control 32.
The project planned publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the project applicant 2.2 P eligibility criteria yes/no/NA 33.
The project applicant, municipality, local authority or Agency Corporation-provides public services specified in the application for the project area N 34.
One project application selection round for one locality project applicant has submitted one application for the project N 35.
If the public service is provided by a municipal corporation, is a contract that lays down: P (NA) 21.8.
certain that the water management community services 35.2.
requirements of the public service of water management to maintain and restore the technical equipment needed to provide the services according to each specific service requirements of 35.3.
the validity period of this Agreement 22.0.
public service of water management area 22.1.
water management the public service provider granted exclusive or special rights 35.6.
get rewards (compensation) payments, investment in public services, infrastructure and conditions for compensation (compensation) payment calculation, control and review, as well as compensation (compensation) payment overpayment and recovering 36.
If the public service is provided in a municipality, or the authority for water management public service Board's decision has been taken that down: P (NA) 36.1.
certain that the water management community services 36.2.
water management of the public service of the territory of 36.3.
water management public service tariffs, 37.
If the public service agency shall provide the authorities of water management, public service management contract has been concluded, the: P (NA) 37.1.
local government agency charged with functions of water management in public services, including certain water management that the public services 37.2.
water management of the public service of the territory of 37.3.
water management public service tariffs 38.
The property of the applicant, the project has all the infrastructure of water public service according to the local authorities and corporations concluded contract, if the applicant is a corporation N (NA) 39.
Project applicant to the application on the first working day of the month is not a tax debt P 40.
A corporation is not in liquidation or insolvency process N (NA) 41.
Project assessment of the financial situation of the applicant certifies financial stability after the implementation of the project N 42.
The project has shown that the applicant will provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project N 43.
Project applicant has stated that it has the right to carry out the works concerned, which within the framework of the project for the construction works N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 44.
The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 45.
Project submission has been prepared according to the application form for the activity N 46.
Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 47.
Project submission prepared into N 48.
Project submission signed by the project responsible person of the applicant or the authorized person N 49.
Filed one project application, the original and one copy, as well as the electronic version of that annex contains only the project application form and cost benefit analysis (where the application is filed in paper form) P (NA) 50.
Both the project the original and the copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages are numbered (if the application is filed in paper form) P (NA) 51.
The project application was made pursuant to legislation on the circulation of electronic documents (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 52.
Project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 53.
Project submission developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 54.
Application of the annex of the draft have been developed and designed according to the legislation on the circulation of electronic documents (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 55.
Project submission form must be filled out in all sections N 56.
The project application is accompanied by all the designated attachments: P (NA) 56.1.
water management development feasibility study (including additional documentation that explain or articulates the technical-economic justification, if required) 56.2.
the project's cartographic material is appropriate, which provide information about the location of project activities in the project area and their impact on the natural attractions in the surrounding area 56.3.
construction estimate 56.4.
Local Government certifying that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning and detailed to 56.5.

Environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision on the environmental impact assessment procedure, or non-application of national environment service regional environmental administration opinion on the fact that the original environmental impact assessment is not necessary 56.6.
water management structures construction project evaluation Commission feasibility studies preparatory to acceptance in accordance with the water management build 56.7 regulatory laws.
Board's decision, management contracts or the municipality and the Corporation (according to the project the applicant's legal status) for the public service of water management a copy of 54.1.
the license for the provision of a copy of the public service, if the services are provided to the Corporation (NA) 56.9.
a copy of the credit agreement concluded or lending institution issued a copy of a document certifying that the credit will be granted without guarantees, if credit is provided without guarantee of a municipality (NA) 55.25.
the municipal decision on financing or (NA) 56.11.
the municipal decision on the guarantee or loan, if the project guarantee or borrowing of municipalities (NA) 56.12.
municipal decision that applicant under the project of the municipality prepared a project application and incorporates the work and the amount of financing 56.13.
project cash flow forecast 4. Criteria for the award of funding to Yes/No 57.
If the application complies with the administrative, compliance and quality evaluation criteria, then 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 13 of the criteria overall rating at least 10 point N 58.
Listing the criteria referred to in paragraph 57 of the "Yes" reviewed the submissions of projects in order of priority (starting with the most points got a submission of the project), the project application selection round of the region within the framework of the quota for funding project funding is sufficient for N application labels.
N – If a negative rating, the application is rejected.
P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision).
NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. "
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky environmental protection and regional development Minister r. vējonis