Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 237 in Riga 29 March 2011 (pr. No 20 58) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 18 august 2008 No. 667 "provisions of the rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix apakšaktivitāt" regional 3.5.1.2.2. waste management system development "issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do cabinet 18 august 2008 No. 667" provisions of the rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix apakšaktivitāt "regional 3.5.1.2.2. waste management system development" (Latvian journal , 2008, no. 144; 2009, 6, 31, no. 192; 2010, no. 106) the following amendments: 1. Replace the words "in the text of the provisions of the Ministry of the environment" (fold) with the words "the protection of the environment and regional development Ministry" (fold).
2. Express and 8.6. section 8.5 the following wording: "8.5. project objectives for the acquisition of technological equipment, Assembly and tuning costs, specialized vehicles and implements acquisition costs;
8.6. the cost of publicity if the publicity does not exceed the minimum requirements set by the laws and regulations of the European Union fund co-financed project publicity and visual identity requirements; ".
3. Express 8.1 point as follows: "project preparation costs 8.1, autoruzraudzīb, superintendence and measures of publicity costs under this provision 8.1., 8.2., 8.3. and 8.6. subparagraph is applicable, if justified by a service or works contract (case joint construction and design Treaty), except for the costs incurred on the basis of the contract of employment."
4. Express 9.6. subparagraph by the following: "9.6. the costs of the measures are carried out in addition to the measures laid down by the regulations on the funds of the European Union co-financed the project publicity and visual identity requirements."
5. Delete paragraph 10.
6. To complement the chapter II with 11.1 points as follows: "the project costs include only 11.1 these rules 8, 9 and 11 above costs."
7. Deleting the introductory part of paragraph 13, the word "all".
8. Express 13.3. subparagraph by the following: "8.3. the duration of the contract (the contract is in force for at least five years after the implementation of the project);".
9. Make a point 20 as follows: 20. If the project application selection round invited potential project applicant does not submit the application within the prescribed time limit or a decision is taken on the application, the rejection of the project the responsible authority retries the call for project submissions: 20.1. the first project application selection round – up to 30 June 2010;
20.2. the second project application selection round-up 31 October 2011. "
10. Express 24 as follows: "24." Project applicant project application (annex 3) prepared according to the rules referred to in annex 4 of the draft application evaluation criteria. "
11. Delete paragraph 35.
12. Put 36 as follows: "36. evaluation the Commission shall assess the project submissions in the following order: 36.1. scored the first application project compliance with this provision, annex 4, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40, paragraph administrative criteria. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
36.2. If the project application these rules 36.1. in the criteria referred to in point evaluates to "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 4, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47. criteria referred to in paragraph 1. If the assessment is in one of the following criteria is "no", the project application and assessment of the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
36.3. If the project application, this provision in the criteria referred to in paragraph 36.2. evaluates to "Yes", the application of these provisions adequately valued in annex 4, 15, 16, 18, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 41, 42 and 48. criteria referred to in paragraph 1 and in accordance with the quality criteria that rule 34. If the application does not comply with this rule 34.1. the quality criteria referred to in the conditions of the application of the evaluation of the project did not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project;
36.4. If the application complies with this rule 34.1. the quality criteria referred to in the conditions of application of the project according to these rules evaluated Annex 4 paragraph 49 of this criterion. "
13. Express 38.1. paragraph by the following: "it meets this rule 38.1.4. administrative criteria listed in the annex, the eligibility criteria and the quality criteria;".
14. Replace the paragraph number and 38.2. the word "with" in paragraph 50 the number and the word "49".
15. Replace the paragraph number and 24.4. the word "with" in paragraph 49 of the number and the word "48".
16. Replace 39.3 in numbers and the words "42 and 43" with numbers and the words "and in paragraph 42 41".
17. Express 24.6. subparagraph by the following: "to clarify the project 24.6. schedule according to the planned project activity (annex 4 of the criteria specified in paragraph 18);".
18. To supplement the provisions of this subparagraph with 39.11.: "39.11. ensure tax payment under this provision, annex 4, paragraph 30 of the criterion."
19. Make 52 as follows: "52. Beneficiaries of all project activities implemented within four years from the date of conclusion of the contract in civil law, but not longer than until 1 June 2015."
20. To supplement the provisions of this chapter XI: "XI. final question 60.8.6. These provisions and 9.6., 11.1 and 13 points and 13.3 shall apply to the submission of the second draft selection round of project submissions."
21. Make 3 Annex 3 contains tables supporting the last line by the following: "total financial reserve, which can be up to 5% of 1 and 2 in the 100% cost line of" 22. Express annex 4 by the following: "4. in the annex to Cabinet of Ministers of 18 august 2008. Regulations No 667 of the cohesion fund the project submission form for the evaluation of Criteria 1 PO box rating. Quality criteria for rating points 1. project readiness stage : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 1.1. not ready technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender and construction regulations in accordance with the procedure laid down in the field of accepted technical project project planned procurement of construction works 1.2.0 up technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender under procurement laws regulating 1 1.3. developed and legislation in the field of construction properly accepted technical project project planned procurement of 2 2 works. the planned project implementation time : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 2.1 is longer than 4 years 0 2.2 is from 3 to 4 years 1 2.3 is from 2 to 3 years (not including) 2 2.4 is shorter than 2 years 3 3. the effectiveness of the implementation of the project in relation to direct waste management improvement of infrastructure: the need to have at least 1 paragraph 3.1. autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is higher than 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 0 3.2. autoruzraudzīb building and the amount of the eligible cost is 3 up to 3.5 percent of project submission planned total eligible costs 1 3.3. autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of the eligible cost amount is from 2.5 to 3 percent (not including) from the project submission planned total eligible costs 2 autoruzraudzīb and Superintendence of 3.4 eligible cost amount is less than 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs of the project 3 4. risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost increase : must be obtained at least 1 paragraph 4.1. project submissions do not assess potential risks in the project application 4.2 0 potential risks assessed, action plan identified risks are not developed or not developed completely 1 4.3. project quality assessment in the application of the risk action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed in incomplete 2 project submission quality 4.4. examined potential risks, develop a reasonable plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 5. analysed in the project application is possible alternatives (financial technical, technological solutions) and carried out an economic analysis of the project: to obtain at least 1 paragraph 5.1. analysis of alternatives has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 5.2 analysis performed for only one of the parameters (only the analysis of alternatives or only economic analysis) have made alternative 1 5.3 analysis and economic analysis of the project, based on the numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives 2 5.4.

analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives, and the chosen alternative is with the objektīvākaj costs 3 6. Waste management system – the infrastructure be created, t.sk. the road-sustainable use assessment: the need to have at least 1 paragraph 6.1. not graded the infrastructure to be a lifetime if it is shorter than 5 years 0 6.2. create infrastructures lifetime is 5 to 7 years (not including) 1 6.3 infrastructure be created life time is from 7 to 17 years 2 6.4. infrastructure to create a lifetime of more than 17 years 3 7. cost assessment index of return (infrastructure planned lifetime (years) relative to the initial project total costs) : note. The average project application selection round costs of return indicators calculation for project submissions that meet the administrative and eligibility criteria – cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of project submissions, the number of Criteria gives extra points 7.1. project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent of the project costs 1 7.2. indicators of return is equal to the average of the project application selection round costs of return the assessment index, or more than 10 percent, or about 10 percent less than the average of the project application selection round costs ROI Assessment index 2 7.3. project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 10 percent of the 3 criteria 1.1 priorities horizontal rating points the garbage, graded 8 t.sk. biodegradable waste, disposal or recycling (sorting line) (sustainable development): the criterion gives additional points 8.1. marketing or processing of the offender is not known or is not intended to create a sorting line 0 8.2. of marketing or processing operator known, reached a written agreement (letter of intent) 1 8.3. marketing or processing contracts concluded and investigator of marketing or processing, or some processing is performed outside the national territory 3. contracts for the sales of 8.4 or processing concluded and the reviewer of marketing or processing known or processing is carried out in the territory of the country of the applicant's project 5 9 additional financial contribution to the implementation of the project (macroeconomic stability): the criterion gives additional points 9.1 is less than 5 percent of the project's eligible costs 1 9.2. is 5 to 10 percent of the project's eligible cost is more than 9.3 2 10 per cent of the eligible costs of the project 3 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No 10. activities envisaged under the project comply with the Cabinet of Ministers approved the regional the waste management plan N 11. After project implementation scheduled to resolve a technical-economic justification of the identified major problems N 12. activities envisaged under the project comply with the municipal waste disposal landfill infrastructure activities N 13. Project application meets the objectives of the activity of the project application to the N 14. included in the assisted actions comply with activities eligible activities N 15. project submissions included in eligible costs comply with the laws and regulations on the implementation of the requirements of the activity activity eligible costs P 16. project application not included in the eligible costs of the activity does not meet the eligible costs of the project application, P 17 project Description provides the necessary information on the action to be taken: N 17.1. given the technical characteristics of the activities to 17.2. planned monitoring indicators are clearly defined, measurable and consistent with the purpose of the activity provided 17.3. actions for the positioning of the project implementation in the territory of 17.4. given what economic benefits provided activities to 17.5. qualitative and quantitative environmental benefits 10.9. given what qualitative and quantitative contribution to the European Union and the Republic of Latvia on the implementation of the requirements of environmental protection and waste management in the area of 17.7 described the polluter-pays principle-respect 18. when implementing the project time schedule of the project comply with the planned project activities P 19. the information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the project will provide the applicant, the sustainability of the project results, not less than 5 years after project implementation: N 19.1. are appropriate as a result of the planned project built into the infrastructure and maintenance costs 19.2 is scheduled according to the tariff policy that will provide the required operating and development costs (in the case of a loan-repayment of the loan also) 19.3. is or will be available for staff to ensure the implementation of the project according to the fixed assets resulting from the operation of the project application contains 20 works and equipment supply indicators meet the project schedule and includes key jobs that characterized the proposed objectives of the project N 21. Project cost-benefit analysis carried out by applying: N 21.1. real social discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 21.2. the real financial discount rate or the appropriate nominal discount rate of 21.3. appropriate conversion factor scores 21.4. According to the medium-term and long-term forecasts 22. project financial analysis demonstrating the project financial stability N 23. Cohesion Fund co-financing requested the aid intensity justified by cost-benefit analysis N 24. Project budget includes cost: N 24.1. include all project costs required for the positions is under construction 24.2. estimates are reasonable and justified 24.3., indicate clearly the assumptions for the calculation of the costs directly necessary 24.4. project 24.5. meet the projected average market prices during the half-year before the project application selection round of the tender 25. Project cash flow forecast : P 25.1. displays both funding demand and cost forecasts 25.2. meet the planned timetable 25.3. meet the financial plan of the project 26. project planned in the application project implementation and human resources ensure planned legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries: 26.1 the administrative project P (for example, procurement, contract administration, record keeping) control of financial project 26.2 (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) management of technical projects (26.3. example , in the design and construction of the reconciliation process, the progress reports, and report preparation) management 27. Project planned publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union fund publicity and visual identity assurance requirements the project applicant 2.2 P eligibility criteria yes/no/NA 28. Project applicant is a public service provider, laws in the order is responsible for municipal waste disposal landfill operation N 29. public service provider contracts have been concluded with the municipal waste management authorities in the region piekritīgaj. The Treaty lays down: P 29.1. – municipal services at the disposal of municipal waste disposal landfill 29.2. municipal waste-disposal requirements of the public service provider to maintain and restore the technical equipment needed to provide these services to meet specific service requirements 29.3. duration of the contract (the contract is in force for at least five years after the implementation of the project) 29.4. municipal waste-disposal of the public service of the territory 29.5. municipal waste-disposal public service provider assigned exclusive or special rights 29.6. ability to receive royalties, investment in public services, infrastructure payment of remuneration and the conditions for the calculation, monitoring and review, as well as the payment of fees and reimbursement of overpayment 30. Project the applicant does not have tax debt on the application of the first working day of the month P 31. Project applicant is not in liquidation or insolvency proceedings 32. Project applicant N has stated that it will provide funding from its own resources, if the increase in the cost of the project N 33.

The property of the applicant's project all assets in municipal waste landfill activity or project, the applicant – merchant who registered in a commercial register, in order to carry out the disposal of municipal waste in a landfill, has stated that after the commissioning of the landfill infrastructure project will be the property of the applicant in accordance with the conditions of the activity and the project applicant will provide public services planned landfill in the region N 34 crew. requesting the project financial assessment of the situation confirms the applicant's project financial stability after the implementation of the project N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 35. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified 36. the project in the period N, the applicant is invited to submit a project application N application 37. the project has been prepared according to the activity application form N application of the project 38. Latvian language ready N 39. project submission prepared into N 40. Project submission signed by the project responsible person of the applicant or the authorized person N 41. one project application submitted to the original and two copies, as well as the electronic version of that annex contains only the cost benefit analysis (if the application filed in paper form) P (NA) 42. project application, the original and copies thereof submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages numbered (if the application filed in paper form) P (NA) 43. project application is designed according to the electronic circulation of documents regulatory requirements in laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 44. project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 45. project submission developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 46. project application attachments are designed and designed according to the circulation of electronic documents regulatory requirements in laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 47. project application form filled in all sections of the application for the project N 48. added to all specified attachments: P (NA) 48.1. the waste management project feasibility study (including additional documentation that explain or articulates the technical-economic justification, if required) 30.0. project the graphical material is appropriate scale that provides information about the location of project activities the project area and their impact on the natural attractions in the surrounding area of 48.4 48.3. the construction estimate its local certificate. which planned to carry out the works that the project complies with the applicable municipal planning or detailed environmental monitoring for 30.1. the national Office's opinion on the environmental impact assessment of the final report or the decision not to apply environmental impact assessment procedures 30.2. municipal waste management regions government jurisdiction agreements with the public service provider for the public service of waste management-municipal waste disposal the relevant provision in the municipal landfill waste management region (CC) license copy of 30.3. public service closed the credit of 30.3. copy or a copy of the document issued by the lending institution, which shows that the credit will be granted without guarantees, if credit is provided without guarantee of a municipality (NA) 30.4. If the project foresees municipal guarantee, guarantee of the municipal decision on (NA) 48.10. If the project foresees municipal guarantee, the decision on the that the municipality of accordance project applicant project application prepared and incorporates the work and the volume of financing (NA) 48.11. project cash flow forecast 4. Funding criteria Yes/No 49. project planned in the application of the Cohesion Fund co-financing shall not exceed the Cabinet 18 august 2008 No. 667 of the provisions of the "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.5.1.2.2. Appendix apakšaktivitāt" regional waste management system development "" 2. in the annex the maximum cohesion fund co-financing of specific waste management region N terms.
N – If a negative rating, the application is rejected.
P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, making clarifications project application, within the time limit laid down in that decision).
NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. "
Prime Minister v. dombrovsky environmental protection and regional development Minister r. vējonis