Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 277 in Riga in 2011. on 12 April (pr. 10. § 24) the procedures for granting State budget funding for youth initiatives and to promote participation in decision-making and public life, working with young people and youth organisations, as well as the supported project administration and monitoring procedures issued pursuant to article 12 of the law on youth of the fifth part i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for granting national budget funding for youth initiatives and to promote participation in decision-making and public life , working with young people and youth organisations, and the allowable rate of co-financing of the project applicant. This financing can take as a contribution in kind, or unpaid voluntary work;
1.2. supported project administration and monitoring procedures.
2. The State budget funding youth statutory objective.
II. Open project tendering 3. Open design competition for the national budget for funding organised by the Ministry of education and Science (hereinafter the Ministry).
4. the Ministry shall develop, approve and place on its website an open design competition rules (hereinafter rules) and its annexes (guidelines for the preparation and submission of the project project implementation, methodological recommendations on the rate of co-financing in the form of a contribution in kind or volunteer work, if this is provided for in the Charter, as well as the application form, the project budget estimates form and the form of the provision of information on project management experience and qualifications of the persons and additional documents If necessary).
5. the Charter State: open design competition 5.1 objectives and eligible activities.
5.2. project applicants which qualify for funding the implementation of the project;
5.3. the deadline for the submission of the application, the project that is not less than 30 days from the date of the statement published on the website;
5.4. the application of the project site and order;
5.5. application development and project design;
5.6. the project documents to add to the application;
5.7 Treasury payment periodicity and modalities, as well as the conditions of the use of funding;
5.8. the minimum and maximum amount of funding that can be assigned to one project, as well as for the implementation of project co-financing by the applicant, if any;
5.9. the project application, administrative compliance and quality assessment criteria assessment criteria;
5.10. specific evaluation criteria under an open design competition for the purpose, if provided;
5.11. the positions of the eligible cost;
5.12. the minimum number of points of the quality evaluation criteria in the total number of points to be considered eligible for the project submission;
5.13. the deadline for implementation of the project;
5.14. the project funding criteria of distribution between the winners of the design contest, if any more.
III. Project to the application Project 6, the applicant shall submit the application for the project. Application of the project consists of: 6.1. completed project submission form;
6.2. the completed project budget estimates form;
6.3. the filled forms for project management experience and qualifications of the person;
6.4. application letter;
6.5. additional documents, specified in the regulations.
7. The provisions of paragraph 6 of the mentioned documents may be submitted in paper form or electronic form, if they are prepared according to the law on electronic document design.
8. The provisions of paragraph 6 of the mentioned documents in paper form the Ministry submitted that rule 5.3. the period referred to in person or sent by post in one or more of the sealed envelopes in two copies (one copy).
9. Paper documents submitted to the project the applicant adds that rule 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 of referred to electronic versions, sending them to the rules specified in the electronic mail address or submitting electronic media.
10. The Ministry shall register the application and the project received the award identification number.
IV. Eligible and ineligible costs eligible are the following 11 project cost items: 11.1. direct costs, or the cost of the project;
11.2. administration costs of the project, which includes the following subdivisions: the cost of the project 11.2.1. administrative staff (Project Manager, Assistant, accountant) remuneration, including State social security payments and other regulations laid down for the good of workers required payments to be made. Remuneration may not exceed the corresponding profile staff qualifications and the average market price in the country;
11.2.2. the mission and travel costs of project implementation and monitoring (daily allowance, accommodation and transport costs);
11.2.3. transport costs (the cost of fuel for a vehicle lease, purchase of transport services for the use of public transport);
11.2.4. postal, telecommunications and electronic communications services;
11.2.5. utility costs;
11.2.6. project implementation for Office supplies and equipment costs;
11.3. public information and publicity costs.
12. If the Charter is designed for project co-financing by the applicant, which may be up to 20 percent of total eligible project costs, it can be expressed as: 12.1. contribution in kind, consisting of facilities located on the project applicant or partner property and placed in service on the applicant of the project project implementation time or material, you grant the applicant of the project the project specific objectives;
12.2. voluntary work, including research and professional activities for which the project is not received remuneration;
12.3. invested funds.
13. the project co-financing from the applicant expressed as a contribution in kind or volunteer work, not exceeding five percent of the project's total eligible costs.
14. contributions in kind or voluntary work for the project to be considered as eligible expenditure if: 14.1. contribution in kind or voluntary work is planned and specified in the project application;
14.2. contribution in kind or the voluntary work has been performed during project implementation, as indicated in the Treaty for the implementation of a project;
14.3. contribution in kind or voluntary work is directly related to the project activities to be implemented;
14.4. equipment or materials are supported by source documents (such as invoices, cheques) or other accounting documents of probative value which is equivalent to invoices;
14.5. voluntary work (including research or professional activities) evaluation in monetary terms is determined taking into account the work of the project and the time spent in hours or days, the average wage rate for work on the project or applicant qualification and profile of the staff of the average market prices in the country;
14.6. contribution in kind is not available for other types of public financial support;
14.7. voluntary contributions in kind or value can be independently assessed and audited in terms of money.
15. On the voluntary work of the project to an individual written contract concluded.
16. The project through voluntary work, bookkeeping, wage costs are not listed.
17. in order to project to benefit voluntary work, the value of the required Installer reports that indicated the number of hours worked and the work done during this period described. Voluntary service is audited, the contract concluded in writing and work sheets.
18. non-eligible costs are: 18.1. project preparation costs of the application;
18.2. the project's administrative staff and project personnel, the premiums paid and the gifts or any other benefits, including health insurance and paid for meals;
18.3. the loan principal and interest payment or other obligations incurred costs;
18.4. debit interest on financial transactions;
18.5. currency exchange fees and exchange rate fluctuation losses;
18.6. fines, penalties, interest on arrears and expenses of litigation;
11.6. the costs already funded from other sources of finance;
12.8. other costs set out in the agreement for the implementation of a project.
V. application and project the project the applicant evaluation 19. Ministry-looking project application that is received the Ministry passed the postal authority (postmark) or sent to the Charter specified electronic mail address (shipping time), subject to the rules set out in the project application deadlines.
20. the project application to the evaluation of the application of the project to start keep unopened. Project application opens the third working day following the rules defined in the project submission deadline.
21. If the application is received after the project Charter project established in the application the deadline for the submission of the project does not open and the Ministry shall inform the applicant of the project location and the time of submission of the project can get back to pending.

22. the project application and assessment of the applicant's project stages: 22.1. evaluation according to administrative compliance evaluation criteria (annex 1). The purpose of the assessment of the project pursuant to administrative compliance evaluation criteria project is to verify that the applicant and the project submission complies with the requirements and quality criteria are directional and the specific evaluation criteria (if provided for in the Charter);
22.2. the project application to the evaluation of the quality evaluation criteria (annex 2) and the specific evaluation criteria (if provided for in the Charter). Quality evaluation criteria and the specific evaluation criteria (if provided for in the Charter) allows you to evaluate the quality of the project application in the context of the open design contest and to support the objectives of the project application, which increases the overall efficiency of the design contest.
23. the project application to the 10 working days prescribed in regulation project for the submission of application to the end of the Ministry evaluated the project's compliance with the administrative application of conformity assessment criteria.
24. If the application or the applicant does not comply with any of the provisions of annex 1 1.1.1., 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.2.1. and 1.2.2. criteria referred to in the Ministry shall decide on the application of the non-compliance of the draft administrative compliance evaluation criteria and its rejection.
25. The Ministry decision on the rejection of the application of the project within 10 working days of the adoption of draft decision forwarded by mail to the applicant and to the project the applicant's designated electronic mail address. A decision on the rejection of the application of the project the project the applicant may appeal to the district administrative court.
26. Where the application does not meet any of the administrative compliance evaluation criteria, except for this provision, the conditions referred to in paragraph 24, the Ministry requests in writing to the applicant of the project to refine the project submission, or submit additional information. The request shall be sent by post to the project the applicant and designated electronic mail address.
27. Where the applicant within seven working days after receipt of the request submitted by the Ministry to clarify the application of the project or the additional information required by post, in person or electronically (if the document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design), the Ministry repeatedly assessed the project application under the administrative compliance evaluation criteria.
28. If after evaluation of the application of the project does not meet any of the administrative compliance evaluation criteria or the applicant within seven working days after receipt of the request by the Ministry failed to submit the additional information required, the Ministry shall decide on the application of the non-compliance of the draft administrative compliance evaluation criteria and its rejection.
29. If the application complies with all the administrative compliance evaluation criteria for project submissions valued in the second phase of the competition Commission, approved by the Ministry. The competition Commission rules approved by the Ministry.
30. The competition Commission may include representatives from direct administration institutions, local authorities, associations and foundations, taking into account the nature of the design contest. The tender Commission shall include at least three members and at least one of them is a representative of the Ministry.
31. After the submission of the project evaluation the quality evaluation criteria and the specific evaluation criteria (if provided for in the Charter), the tender Commission shall draw up a list of the projects evaluated the application in which they are arranged in order of priority according to the process of evaluating the resulting ratings and submit it to the Secretary of State of the Ministry.
32. If two or more project applications have received the same number of points, it is a prized project submission list ranked in the following order of priority: 32.1. project application with the highest rating for this rule to annex 2 criteria referred to in paragraph 2;
32.2. the project application with the highest rating for this rule to annex 2 criteria referred to in paragraph 5;
32.3. a project application with the highest rating for this rule to annex 2 criteria referred to in paragraph 9.
Vi. Decision 33. Ministry according to the tender assessment produced by the Commission in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 31 of the decision on the State budget funding for the implementation of the project or the decision on refusal of funding for the implementation of the project. The decision is open design competition.
34. If the submission of the project evaluation process the resulting rating is lower than 75 percent of the quality evaluation criteria and the specific evaluation criteria (if provided for in the Charter) total score, the Ministry shall decide on the application to reject the project.
35. The State budget funding for the implementation of the project, which got the largest number of points, as long as there is sufficient to open the project to competitive tender for the State budget funding.
36. the decision on the State budget funding for the implementation of the project or the decision on refusal of funding for the implementation of the project the Ministry within 10 working days of the adoption of draft decision forwarded by mail to the applicant and to the project the applicant's designated electronic mail address.
37. Notice of open design contest results shall be published on the website of the Ministry.
38. the decision on refusal of funding the State budget for the implementation of the project the project the applicant may appeal to the district administrative court.
VII. Agreement on the implementation of the project preparation and conclusion 39. Ministry within 10 working days after the decision on State financing of the budget for the implementation of the project the project the applicant offers to conclude a contract for the project implementation.
40. If the applicant refuses to conclude the agreement on the implementation of the project, the Ministry offers to conclude a contract for the implementation of the project the project the applicant who has received the next highest number of points.
41. The agreement on the implementation of the project included the following: 41.1. basic conditions of implementation of the project;
41.2. the ministries and the project implementing obligations and rights;
41.3. financial resources for the payment order;
25.7. report, interim review and final reporting procedures;
25.8. the conditions of use of funding;
25.8. unused or not eligible for repayment of the financing arrangements;
25.9. termination and amendment of the agreement;
41.8. dispute procedures;
41.9. publicity;
41.10. other information, which the Ministry and the project the applicant considers relevant.
42. the project, the applicant may withdraw the application project at any time, pending the conclusion of the agreement on the implementation of the project.
43. the conclusion of the agreement for the implementation of a project, the project, the applicant becomes the project promoter and the Ministry of finance supports the implementation of the project according to the agreement for the implementation of a project.
VIII. monitoring of the implementation of the project 44. monitoring of the implementation of the project, the Ministry provides the following ways: 44.1. each year conduct random monitoring visits to the project site visits in advance in coordination with the project promoter;
44.2. assess the implementation of the project to prepare for the project, final report and interim review.
45. If during the implementation of the project requires changes to the project, the project implementer they coordinated with the Ministry under the agreement for the implementation of a project deadline.
46. If after the expiry of the deadline for implementation of the Ministry notes that the project implementer project funding is used according to the project objectives and budget estimate, the Ministry carried out the final payment within the time limit set in the Treaty after the transfer and acceptance Act was signed.
47. If, after the implementation of the project remains unused financial means from the assigned amount of funding, the project implementer transferred back to the Ministry within 15 working days after the project deadline.
IX. request and provision of information 48. Until a decision on the State budget funding for the implementation of the project or on refusal of funding for the implementation of the project information on the project, the progress of the application are entitled to only the project applicant or authorised person of the applicant.
49. the project applicant is entitled to consult the project submission evaluation materials only after the entry into force of the decision on the State budget funding for the implementation of the project or on refusal of funding for the implementation of the project.
50. information on State budget funding recipient (beneficiary's name and address), the name of the project, the amount of funding granted, purpose, within which the funding granted pursuant to paragraph 2 of these regulations, and the implementation of the project site, as well as a summary of the activities under the project activities is publicly available information. This information is available after the entry into force of the decision on the State budget financing of the implementation of the project or on refusal of funding for the implementation of the project in question.
X. closing question

51. To declare unenforceable in the Cabinet of 16 December 2008, Regulation No 1018 "procedures for granting funding in the State budget, designed to encourage young people's initiative and participation in decision-making and public life, as well as working with youth" (Latvian journal, 2008, 198. no; 2009, 137 no).
Prime Minister Dombrovskis v. Minister for education and science r. Brok annex 1 Cabinet April 12, 2011 regulations no 277 evaluation of the application of the project in accordance with administrative compliance evaluation criteria 1. Administrative compliance evaluation criteria are as follows: 1. the applicant's project eligibility criteria: no PO box
Criteria Yes No 1.1.1 project applicant complies with article 12 of the law on youth and open design contest rules requirements of the project, the applicant is not the applicant project 1.1.2. tax and the State social insurance compulsory contribution to the Charter specified debt project submission filing date applicant project 1.1.3. operation is stopped, the insolvency proceedings initiated in respect of the applicant, the project applicant project 1.1.4. the agreement for the implementation of a project deadline has passed its previous contractual arrangements with the Ministry for the previous reporting year (if applicable) 1.2 project submission compliance. criteria: no PO box
Criteria 1.2.1. design application yes no is filed within the time limit set for submission of project 1.2.2 refers to open design contest objective in accordance with 1.2.3. filed the requested a copy of the project application (copy of) the number of submissions, 1.2.4 the project if it is filed in paper form is cauršūt (caurauklot) with all attached documents and is stamped 1.2.5 project submission completed typed application project 1.2.6. filled in Latvian language 1.2.7. the project submission (receipt) is signed by the applicant's project officer project application 1.2.8 is added to the project the applicant's signed application letter
 
 
1.2.9. the project application is fully completed and drawn up according to the project application form (annex to the Statute) 1.2.10. the project budget estimate has been completed according to the project budget form (annex to the regulations). information about the project in 1.2.11 participating project management people to work experience and qualifications has filled according to the prescribed form (Charter) 1.2.12. the planned project implementation period shall not exceed the stated maximum project period 1.2.13. all project activity satisfies the regulations laid down by the eligible types of activities a project submission 1.2.14. the requested amount of funding set out in the statute complies with the funding of approximately
 
 
1.2.15. co-financing the project specified in the application shall not be less than the prescribed amount of co-financing rules (if applicable) project application 1.2.16 is accompanied by all required documents 1.2.17. project budget is calculated all the costs are indicated in lats (LVL) 1.2.18. project cost is accurately calculated 1.2.19. project costs are attributable 1.2.20. copies of certified connected according to the requirements of the laws and the documents in the field of developing and designing project application 1.2.21 has added this provision to 6.1. 6.2. and 6.3., referred to electronic versions, and they are readable by the Minister of education and science r. Brok annex 2 Cabinet-April 12, 2011 regulations no 277 project submission evaluation quality assessment criteria of quality evaluation criteria are as follows: no PO box
Criteria the maximum number of points 1. Project is an important open design contest objective 5 2 is an important project for the improvement of the situation of youth policy in the sector, and has offered a practical solution to improve the situation is exactly 5 3. define the target group of the project and given the characteristics of the target groups of the project 5 4. the target group is strategically chosen correctly, and are based on the selected target group needs 5 5. Project after project implementation 5.1. the result: further uses 3 5.2 lasting impact to the target group of the project submission 3 6. contains the project results and performance indicators of the project contributes to the diverse 5 7. cooperation in the youth sector, which significantly affect the expected results of efficiency and effectiveness in the long term, the project is developed in 3 8. According to the schedule of activities objective 5 9. Project activities are: 9.1. required and meet the needs of the target group 3 9.2. detailed and feasible in 3 10. Project budget is detailed and justified the planned expenditure is necessary for the implementation of the planned activity 5 11. Expenditure is proportionate in relation to the expected results of the project submission 5 12. provides a detailed description of the involvement of young people in project preparation, implementation and evaluation of the project by the applicant 5 13. management capacity and project management experience and qualifications of the person is adequate for the implementation of the project. the project submission 5 14 contains the implementation risks and risk prevention measures 3 the maximum number of points together 68 Minister of education and science r. Brok