Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 964 Riga 2011 20 December (pr. No. 75 17. §) rules for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 Fund programs implementation activities in accordance with the issued the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" within the established fund management law article 14, paragraph 3 (I). General questions 1. determines: 1.1. European third country nationals Integration Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Fund), the 2010 programme for the implementation of activities and projects of the Fund application evaluation criteria the following activities : 1.1.1.  1.1. activity "Program development and efforts to promote the newly arrived third-country nationals in the host society for the adaptation, and help them to learn the Latvian language, knowledge of Latvian history, institutions, socio-economic characteristics, cultural life, etc." (activity 1.1);
1.1.2.1.2. activity "to improve access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and products, as well as to help them to integrate into Latvian society by providing mediation services and necessary advice" (activity 1.2);
1.1.3.1.3. activity "to develop education programmes for young people or adaptation-third-country nationals (hereinafter referred to as 1.3. activity);
1.1.4.1.4. activity "to promote a more favourable treatment in the host society, migration as well as measures of integration through education campaigns, especially in the mass media" (hereinafter referred to as the 1.4 activity);
1.1.5.2.1. activity "information technology systems for effective integration of third-country nationals policy planning and adaptation to the needs of immigrants" (further-2.1. activity);
1.1.6.2.2. activity monitoring tools and evaluation schemes for integration policies, the development and implementation of integration measures "(hereinafter referred to as 2.2. activity);
1.1.7.3.1. activity "to develop and implement training courses for employees of public authorities, representatives of local authorities, social workers, medical staff, NGOs and representatives of international organisations, etc. professionals who provide services to immigrants" (hereinafter referred to as the activity 3.1);
1.1.8.3.2. activity "the involvement of non-governmental organizations in building intercultural dialogue between Latvia and third-country nationals and third country nationals, promoting active citizenship" (hereinafter referred to as 3.2. activity);
1.1.9.4.1. activity "effective functioning of integration Assistance policy, through exchanges of experience and good practices with other Member States" (hereinafter referred to as the activity 4.1);
1.2. requirements for the project the applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant);
1.3. the Fund's project application (hereinafter referred to as the project application) the organisation of the selection procedure;
1.4. the project application preparation and submission;
1.5. application procedures for the evaluation of projects;
1.6. the grant award procedure;
1.7. the arrangements for implementing the project;
1.8. technical assistance for the implementation of the activity.
2. Payments to fund projects for expenditure incurred up to June 30, 2012, may be performed during the period from the date of the decision on the application of the project approval or approved on the conditions laid down in the Treaty, to grant the project a final report due date, but not later than July 31, 2012.
3. To Fund activities relating to the implementation of the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows" within the established fund management rules set out in article 7 of the managing authority and the right to exercise the Ministry of culture (hereinafter referred to as the managing authority).
4. the Fund's target group: 4.1. third-country nationals, as well as stateless persons (hereinafter referred to as third-country nationals) who arrived in Latvia in the last five years before the Foundation of the project undertaken, and illegally staying in the territory of the Republic of Latvia;
4.2. third-country nationals who have received permission to travel to the Republic of Latvia to them prior to entry to ensure integration services and third-country nationals who are legally residing in the Republic of Latvia 5-10 years ago launched the project of the Foundation, as well as students and researchers. That person can be included in the target group, if applicable funds the project objectives and project based the project applicant submissions.
5. the Fund's target group not the nationals of third countries who submitted an application for asylum and for which a final decision has not yet been adopted, which is the status of refugee or alternative or eligible for refugee status or asylum in accordance with the law, as well as seasonal workers, even if these third-country nationals comply with this provision in paragraph 4.1 and 4.2.
II. Requirements for the project the applicant 6. General requirements: applicant 6.1 project it by a decision of the Court of Justice has not been declared bankrupt (including not in the rehabilitation process, or the process of legal protection), its economic activity is not terminated or in accordance with the commercial information that is not in the process of liquidation (if applicable);
6.2. it provided false information to the managing authority in relation to the implementation of projects co-financed from the funds;
6.3. interest of the person it is not done this crime that hit the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, and it does not have adequate means to influence forced;
6.4. it has received financing or does not provide for funding for the same eligible costs of other activities in the framework of local, regional, national or European Union funds;
6.5. This is adhered to the conditions of funding consistent with the laws governing the State budget allocations for the implementation of projects co-financed by the Fund, and to make payments and preparation of declarations of expenditure;
6.6. it activities within the framework of one Fund has submitted one application for the project;
6.7. If it's been a project applicant in another Fund annual program, it's up to the application to the date of submission of the project to repay improper expenses incurred if it is requested by the managing authority.
7. The specific requirements of the project applicant is defined in the relevant provisions of this chapter governing the implementation of each activity.

III. submission of Project selection, organizing the project application selection 8 the managing authority organised as a limited application selection or as revealed the project application selection, taking into account the requirements of these regulations that apply to each specific activity.
9. the project application selection in managing authority may organise each activity individually, multiple activities or all activities at the same time.
10. application of the selection of projects is the following: 10.1 the managing authority shall open the project application selection by placing an advert in the newspaper "journal" or, if the limited application of the selection of projects, sending the invitation project, the applicant referred to in this provision in a particular activity;
10.2. the project the applicant shall prepare and submit project application;
10.3. the managing authority shall ensure that the submission of the draft assessment and shall take a decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of a conditional, if these rules are not satisfied those requirements or fulfil that projects listed in the annexes to the rules of the application of the evaluation criteria (1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8, 9, 10 and 11);
10.4. If the application is approved on condition that the managing authority shall ensure that the assessment of the conditions;
10.5. the managing authority shall conclude with the approved project submission the applicant (hereinafter referred to as the beneficiary) grant agreement for the implementation of the project.
11. Announcement of open project application selection or limited project application selection call the managing authority specifies: 11.1. Fund name and purpose of the activity;
11.2. the activities of the Fund within the funding available;
11.3. the project to the application procedure and deadlines;
11.4. a statement of the projects for the preparation of the application, the materials used, the submission of the project evaluation criteria, the European Union and national funding arrangements available in the managing authority's homepage on the internet and ask a question.
IV. Project preparation and submission of application 12. Project applicant project application submitted to the managing body of these provisions 10.1. messages referred to in subparagraph or the invitation within the time limit specified.
13. the project application consists of the completed project submission form (annex 12), and the following additional documents: 13.1. project budget form (annex 13);
13.2. a detailed written justification, if the subcontract for the project exceeds 40% of the direct eligible costs (if applicable);
13.3. the project the applicant a certified copy of the certificate of registration (does not apply to the direct and immediate State administrations, public law legal entities and international organisations);
13.4. project terms of reference, a copy of the applicant (if applicable);
13.5. The State revenue service's statement that the applicant does not have the project tax debt (a certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project) or the signed authorisation of the applicant as it authorises the managing authority to request from the State revenue service referred to in this statement (does not apply to public authorities and public-law legal entities);
13.6. The business register certificate, which certifies that the applicant has the project been declared insolvent, including not in the rehabilitation process, or in the legal protection process and not in the process of liquidation (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or the written authorization of the applicant, in which it authorizes the managing authority to request this statement referred to the register of enterprises (this section does not apply to the direct and immediate State administrations and public entities);
8.5. the project applicant project administration of the Fund and those involved in the implementation of dzīvesgait (CV) (if applicable);
13.8. the project partners participate in the certificate of approval of the project implementation in the funds (annex 14);
13.9. the cooperation partner of the certified copy of the registration certificate (does not apply to the direct and immediate national administrations) and a copy of the statutes of the partners (if applicable);
13.10. The State revenue service's statement that the partner is not a tax debt (issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project of the Foundation) or the partners signed a letter of consent, which it authorises the managing authority to request from the State revenue service referred to in this statement (does not apply to the direct and immediate State administrations and public entities);
13.11. The business register certificate, which certifies that the partner has not been declared insolvent, including not in the rehabilitation process, or in the legal protection process and not in the process of liquidation (certificate issued not earlier than one month prior to the application of the project), or the written consent of the partners of the letter, in which it authorizes the managing authority referred to in this statement (does not apply to public authorities and public-law legal entities);
13.12. the project partners of the Fund for the Administration and implementation of the project involved the description of dzīvesgait (CV) (if applicable);
13.13. credit inquiries about granting the project applicant or its partners or their account balance, if the project foresees the use of additional financial resources, leveraging the project applicant or partner funding. These certificates shall be submitted for an amount that is not less than the planned project, additional financial resources. The project at the date of application to the credit certificate may not be older than 30 calendar days.
14. the project application submitted with a cover letter. The covering letter indicates the name of the applicant, the draft annual programme of activities, the application number and the list of documents attached.
15. the project application shall be drawn up in accordance with the existing laws and regulations on the development and presentation of the document.
16. the project applicant project application can be submitted by the lead institution: 16.1 in paper form by submitting personally or by sending by registered mail;
16.2. an electronic document, by personally by sending by registered mail or by sending to the managing authorities in electronic mail address.

17. If the project application submitted in paper form, it shall be submitted in one copy together with an electronic copy of the identical electronic media with relevant references. A copy of the application to a project in the form of a submitted paper, numbered caurauklot, with table of contents, on the back of the last page of the thread ends are glued, stamped with the seal of the applicant and the project on the labels provide information on the number of pages in the document, proof of the correctness of the content of the document, the document author's name, signature, date and place of preparation of the document. The draft mandate of the applicant (if applicable) and submit the cover letter individually, not cauraukloj.
18. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document, it developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format, signed with a secure electronic signature and a time stamp is added in accordance with the legislation on electronic document design.
19. If the project application submitted personally or sent by registered mail shall be placed in an envelope or box, which indicates the following: 19.1. "restricted access information";
19.2 the managing authority name and address;
19.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;
19.4. "European integration of third-country nationals Fund project submission";
19.5. the annual program activity number and name;
12.2. submission of the project name.
20. If the project application submitted to an electronic document, sent to the managing authority electronic mail address, e-mail notification, under "subject" indicates that rule 19.1, 19.4, 19.5 and 19.6. the information referred to in point.
21. the managing authority shall, on receiving the application, the project records the receipt of the application, project, time and date and be recorded in the Ministry of culture of the accounting document. Project submissions draft submission numbers are assigned by the opening of the meeting in which the project application for the evaluation of the Commission and the representatives of the managing authority.
V. Project submission evaluation projects submitted 22. application assessment provides a project set up by the managing authority for the application of the assessment Commission (hereinafter the Commission).
23. If the intended found the project application selection, the Commission begins work by project submission deadline for submission.
24. If the limited application of selection of projects, the Commission may initiate the evaluation of the application of the project before the project specified in the invitation for the submission of the application if the applicant, the project having sent an invitation, if you submitted the application for the project.
25. When starting, Commission members, experts and observers signed a statement that during the meetings of the Commission for information and content of the document will not be disclosed to third parties. The members of the Commission shall sign a declaration that there are no circumstances which would lead to believe that they are interested in a specific project approval or rejection of the application.
26. the Commission notes that the application is submitted the project announcement, or within the time limit set in the invitation. Project applications submitted after the deadline and not open, and the managing authority shall send the draft back to the applicant with the reason for the examination.
27. the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project on the application of the project assigned registration number.
28. the Commission project submissions valued under these rules laid down by the Administration and specific activity determine the assessment criteria (1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8, 9, 10 and 11). Each project submissions valued at least two members of the Commission.
29. first, the Commission shall assess the project submissions according to refine, not administrative evaluation criteria (annex 1). If the application does not comply with something not to be an administrative evaluation criteria, the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends the application of the project should be rejected.
30. If the application complies with all of the project not to be administrative evaluation criteria, the Commission shall evaluate the application of the project in accordance with the quality evaluation criteria (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11). If the original attached to the assessor the lowest and the highest number of points assigned according to the quality evaluation criteria differ by more than 30% of the maximum possible score, the head of the Commission, asked to assess the project submissions for another Member of the Commission or even assess it.
31. The overall assessment in accordance with the assessment criteria of quality is obtained by summing the points of each evaluator, and the amount divided by the number of assessors. The Commission recommends that the project be rejected if the application project application in at least one quality evaluation criteria won less than the minimum required number of points in accordance with the provisions of the relevant annexes, which shall determine the quality evaluation criteria.
32. The limited application of the selection of projects by the Commission: 32.1.  the project application is considered appropriate and move for approval if the project application to the quality evaluation criteria at least 55% of the gained the maximum number of points, reached the minimum number of points in accordance with the quality evaluation criteria and the activity is sufficient funding for its implementation;
32.2. the project submissions for approval of move, if you need clarification on any criteria that under these rules are defined as projects under the application may specify (annex 1);
32.3. prepare and submit to the leading body of the evaluation report, which included information on project submissions are received, the evaluation process, the parties involved in the evaluation process, as well as the approval and rejection of a proposed project submissions and their reasons for rejection.
33. Open Fund project application selection: 33.1. the Commission, after consideration of the submissions of projects submitted to the project submissions in the Evaluation Committee for the management of the Fund in accordance with the specific evaluation criteria set out in annex 2 to these regulations;
33.2. the rejected submissions for the project, the Commission shall prepare a summary of the information management Committee of the Fund;

33.3. each project application under the specific evaluation criteria evaluated by two members of the Management Committee of the Fund. If the said Steering Committee member assigned point total in accordance with specific evaluation criteria differ by more than 30% of the maximum number of points that can be obtained in accordance with specific evaluation criteria, Management Committee instructs the application to evaluate the project, another Member of the Management Committee of the Fund;
33.4. the Steering Committee of the project application specific criteria for the assessment of the total number of points in accordance with the quality and specific evaluation criteria and arrange project applications in order of priority according to the resulting points;
33.5. the project application is considered appropriate and move for approval if all the following conditions are implemented: 33.5.1. submission of project quality evaluation criteria and the specific evaluation criteria in at least 55% of the gained the maximum number of points;
33.5.2. project submissions received at least the minimum required number of points in accordance with the quality evaluation criteria or specific evaluation criteria;
33.5.3. after the project submission ranking in order of priority, taking into account that the project approval submissions, which got the largest number of points, there is sufficient funding for the implementation of the project application;
20.9. project submissions for approval of move, if you need clarification on any criteria that under these rules are defined as projects under the application may specify;
20.9. the Fund's Management Committee shall prepare and submit to the Commission the specific evaluation criteria of assessment summaries;
33.8. the Commission, on the basis of the Fund's Management Committee and the Commission's assessment shall be submitted to the managing body of the evaluation report, which included information on project submissions are received, the evaluation process, the parties involved in the evaluation process, as well as the approval and rejection of a proposed project submissions and their reasons for rejection.
34. the managing authority shall, on the basis of the Commission's evaluation report, shall take a decision on the application of the project: 34.1. approval this rule 32.1. and 33.5. in the cases referred to in (a);
21.3. the approval provided that rule 32.2. and 20.9. in the cases referred to in (a);
21.3. rejection occurs when at least one of the following conditions: application to project 34.3.1 does not meet the criteria for administrative assessment that under these rules as defined under the project application can specify;
34.3.2. the project application to the quality evaluation criteria and the specific criteria in the assessment (if applicable) have not won at least 55% of the maximum possible number of points;
34.3.3. the project application did not reach the minimum required number of points in accordance with a specific quality or specific evaluation, the evaluation criteria (if applicable);
34.3.4. after the project submission ranking in order of priority, taking into account that the project approval submissions, which got the highest number of points is not sufficient funds for the implementation of the project application.
35. the managing authority within five working days after the decision sends the decision to the project applicant.
36. the decision on the application for the approval of the project, provided the conditions set out in the project the applicant provides a managing authority within the time limit.
37. the Commission (both limited and open selection of the projects of the Foundation) within 10 working days after receipt of the information on conditions, assess their compliance with the rules referred to in paragraph 36 of the decision contained in the conditions concerning the Administration and quality evaluation criteria.
38. Open Fund project application in the selection of the managing authority within five working days after the Commission evaluated the conditions, send the Steering Committee to examine whether the conditions are fulfilled in accordance with specific evaluation criteria.
39. following the evaluation of conditions managing authority shall draw up an opinion on the conditions. If the conditions are met, the managing authority shall inform the applicant of the project of the grant contract conditions.
40. If the decision on the application for approval of a project, provided the conditions are not met or are not met within the time limit laid down in that decision, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected.
41. If it is found that the project applicant knowingly provided false information in any project with consideration of the application, the managing authority shall suspend the application of the project further upstream, not the project applicant and inform.
Vi. the Grant contract activities within 42 months after the decision on the approval of the project application to the managing authority by the beneficiary grant agreement concluded, which defines the obligations of the Contracting Parties and rights, as well as the procedure and conditions (including the financing conditions and payment arrangements), which must be followed to ensure the implementation of the project of the Foundation.
43. the managing authority shall terminate the project application selection without closing the grant agreement if all projects submitted submissions do not meet the evaluation criteria or have been rejected by other objective reasons (force majeure, not available financial means or other special circumstances that preclude the Fund project).
44. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission and provide a report to the managing authority on the progress of the implementation and financial implementation in accordance with the grant agreement.
45. If the beneficiary does not reach the monitoring indicators of the project, but the reach project goals, leading authority in proportion to reduced funding for the project in question, except in the case where the beneficiary has reached at least 85% of the monitoring indicator and prove that has taken all the measures necessary to achieve the project monitoring indicators.
46. Funding recipient project open separate accounts for the Treasury, from which is made and which is received by all the project-related payments.

47. the amendments shall be made in accordance with the project grant agreement arrangements. Must not alter the purpose or project monitoring indicators, as well as issues that affect the valuation criteria set information in these terms in relation to the specific activity as defined under which the project application should not specify.
48. If during the implementation of the project requires amendments to the project, the beneficiary shall submit the draft amendments to the managing authority and the reasons therefor. If the managing authority, the evaluation of the submitted draft amendments to the agreement grants the compatibility of this provision, paragraph 47, and the requirements of law, as well as their impact on the achievement of the project objectives, establishes the need to amend the grant contract, it prepares the grant agreement draft amendments and send it to the project funding recipient.
49. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot your website on the internet.
50. The beneficiary shall ensure that all the technical characteristics of information and publicity actions under the European Commission's March 5, 2008. Decision 2008/457/EC, which lays down the procedure for implementing Council decision 2007/435/EC establishing for the period 2007-2013 the European integration of third-country nationals Fund as part of the General Programme "solidarity and management of migration flows", in relation to the Member States ' management and control systems , administrative and financial management rules and Fund co-financed project eligibility of expenditure, article 35.
51. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project-related information and documentation storage up to December 31, 2021.
VII. 1.1. activities implementation and project submission evaluation criteria 1.1.52. the purpose of the activity is to third-country nationals for the quality of the adaptation program (Latvian language courses, kultūrorientācij courses, support measures for vulnerable groups of third-country nationals) and organizing to ensure full access to services and participation in the host society, as well as strengthen the integration ability to reach vulnerable third country nationals of groups-women, children, older people people with disabilities or persons with low education level.
53.1.1. activity monitoring can leverage the following indicators: 53.1. the integration courses and training involve at least 100 third-country nationals;
53.2. developed in at least three different types of informational materials (such as labour law, labour protection, social guarantees, access to education and health care);
53.3. create at least three different support mechanisms for vulnerable groups of third-country nationals (for example, child minding services, specific support groups within those target groups, measures aimed at information and services more accessible, create subsidised jobs, such as people with low education levels, disabled persons);
53.4. implemented at least one interactive, educational and preventive measures in the initiative of third-country nationals children.
54.1.1. activity is implemented as an open project application selection.
55.1.1. activity the project applicant and their partners can be public authorities and public-law legal persons, associations and foundations, universities and international organizations.
56.1.1. activity in the framework of the project, the following measures: 56.1. course of integration and the establishment and implementation of introduction programmes, to enable immigrants to gain basic knowledge of the Latvian language, history, social and economic characteristics, cultural life, the public administration system, and other areas of fundamental rights;
56.2. measures to develop and improve the quality of introduction programmes at national and regional level, with particular emphasis on third-country nationals ' civic participation and local community involvement in the integration of third-country nationals;
56.3. support mechanisms and the provision of services to vulnerable groups of third-country nationals (for example, child minding services, specific support groups within those target audiences, create subsidised jobs, including people with low level of education or young people without work experience, people with disabilities);
56.4. educational, interactive and enabling the implementation of initiatives for children (children's involvement in public activities, including volunteering and non-formal education programmes, activities for children and young people from third-country nationals, families save the culture and tradition of the promotion).
57. in the framework of the activity 1.1 available funding is $421 682, formed by the Fund is 316 262 lats and State budget funds 105 420 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget to finance the project application can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
58. the minimum activity 1.1 available funding one project application to cover the eligible costs are $14 056.
59. The project can be implemented in the courses and programmes that are developed beforehand. Training course or the escalation costs must not exceed 20% of the development costs. Training course or program is considered updated when changes to the content of more than 10% but not more than 50% of its volume. Training course or programme in which the changes to the content shall not exceed 10%, shall be deemed to be not escalated, but the training course or programme in which the changes exceed 50%, considered to be new.
60.1.1. activities within the training course or a minimum of 40 hours.
61. the project submissions 1.1. activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, the quality of the assessment criteria laid down in annex 3 of these regulations, and the specific evaluation criteria set out in annex 2 to these rules.
VIII. implementation and activity 1.2 project submission evaluation criteria 62.1.2 the purpose of the activity is sustainable organisational structures to improve the access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and goods, as well as help to integrate into Latvian society by providing mediation services and the necessary advice.
63.1.2. activity monitoring can leverage the following indicators:

39.2. ensure at least four different specialist help for third-country nationals;
39.3. created and maintained informative free phone;
63.3. provide advice to service providers and professionals in different areas;
63.4. organized informational events;
63.5. supported the work of the Board;
63.6. secured four points in support of regional integration;
63.7. support regional integration point coordination function;
63.8. ensure at least two consultative support (power) session in the regional integration support points.
64.1.2. activity is implemented as a more limited application.
65.1.2. activity project applicants may be public bodies in the exercise of State policy in the area of integration of society and contribute to the development of civil society and intercultural dialogue, coordinated support system development, to promote the successful integration of immigrants into society.
66.1.2. activity in the framework of the project, the following measures: 66.1. professionals – lawyers, psychologists, social workers, the provision of advice to third-country nationals;
66.2. the provision of assistance to the third-country nationals in crisis situations;
66.3. informative and cultural events and informative material;
66.4. National Integration Center home page on the internet maintenance, Russian and Latvian in English;
41.3. provision of advice and assistance to social service providing institutions with representatives of the third-country nationals and advisory support (power) organisation of professionals;
66.6. the provision of advice to other service providers and professionals in different areas;
66.7. the free phone for third-country nationals;
41.5. Advisory Council work to integrate and promote the participation of third-country nationals in the public and political life and improve relations between third-country nationals and the rest of society, including the public authorities, the social partners and the majority of society;
66.9. providing advice and coordinating the activities of the regional integration support point for development.
67.1.2. activities project in the application of this provision should be made for all the measures referred to in paragraph 66, and should reach all these rules referred to in paragraph 63 of the monitoring indicators.
68. in the framework of the activity 1.2 the available funding is $281 122, consisting of 210 841 dollar fund and the State budget financing in the amount of LVL 70 281. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
69.1.2. activity minimum available funding one project to cover the eligible cost is $14 056.
70. project submissions 1.2. activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, and the quality of the evaluation criteria set out in annex 4 of these rules.
IX. 1.3. activities implementation and project submission evaluation criteria 71.1.3 the purpose of the activity is to encourage third-country nationals youth adaptation and integration process of the Latvian environment, providing a support system for building and developing intercultural skills at all levels of involvement.
72.1.3. activity monitoring can leverage the following indicators: 72.1. create at least one intercultural learning and diversity management system (package, which includes the development and approval of the program and staff training);
72.2. create at least one support mechanism for third-country nationals concerned young people (for example, consultation of third-country nationals student advocacy organization, youth camps of third-country nationals involvement of young people in building intercultural dialogue).
73.1.3. activity is implemented as a more limited application.
74.1.3. activity of the applicant in the project can be public authorities, developing national education standards and in accordance with the requirements set out in the standards develop and approve education programmes, teaching standards and school subjects and the course samples.
75.1.3. activity in the framework of the project, the following measures: 75.1. intercultural learning and diversity management and implementation systems (package, including program development, approval and staff training);
75.2. the support mechanism for the creation of third-country nationals concerned young people (for example, consultation of third-country nationals student advocacy organization, youth camps of third-country nationals involvement of young people in building intercultural dialogue).
76.1.3. activities the project application must provide all of these rules, the measures referred to in paragraph 75, and should reach all the rules mentioned in paragraph 72 of the monitoring indicators.
77. activities within 1.3 available funding is 140 561 lats, which consists of 105 421 dollar fund and the State budget funding 35 140 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
78.1.3. activity minimum available funding one project application to cover the eligible costs are $14 056.
79. project submissions 1.3. activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, and the quality of the evaluation criteria set out in annex 5 of these rules.
1.4. X activity implementation and project evaluation criteria applications 80.1.4. the purpose of the activity is to promote positive attitudes towards migration and integration of third-country nationals policy measures Latvia, as well as to promote tolerance, disseminating information and educating the public of Latvia on issues relating to the entry of third-country nationals and live in Latvia.
81.1.4 activity can leverage the following monitoring indicators: 81.1. implemented at least three different public awareness activities (such as television, radio, outdoor advertising, posters), information campaigns, debates, exhibitions;
81.2. training for third-country nationals living issues involved at least five Latvian media;
81.3. implemented at least one informational event, in which the public is involved in third-country nationals.

82.1.4 implement an activity as a limited Fund project application selection.
83.1.4. activity project applicants may be public bodies in the exercise of State policy in the area of integration of society and contribute to the development of civil society and intercultural dialogue, coordinated support system development, to promote the successful integration of immigrants into society.
84.1.4. activity in the framework of the project, the following measures: 84.1. educational and informative activities that appeals to a broad range of the population and increased awareness of the issues of immigrant integration, as well as promote immigrant integration into Latvian culture and public life;
52.3. actions to promote media involvement in the integration of third-country nationals issues and more tolerant society.
85.1.4. activities project in the application of this provision should be made for all the measures referred to in paragraph 84, and should reach all the provisions referred to in paragraph 81 of the monitoring indicators.
86. activities within 1.4 available funding is $96 586, consisting of 72 439 Fund lats and State budget funds 24 147 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
87. the minimum activity 1.4 available funding one project to cover the eligible cost is $14 056.
88. project submissions 1.4 activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, and the quality of the evaluation criteria set out in annex 6 of these rules.
XI. 2.1. activities implementation and project submission evaluation criteria 89.2.1 the purpose of the activity is to ensure the availability of quality data for effective integration of third-country nationals policy planning, implementation and monitoring.
90.2.1. activity monitoring can leverage the following indicators: 90.1. developed a methodology and recommendations package, using information technology, provide various kinds of information about third country nationals, citizenship, age, sex, education, occupation, time of residence, family reunification and other information;
90.2. the trained staff to work with statistical data;
90.3. the environment was created and maintained, which allows you to perform data analysis to the study of the needs of immigrants.
91.2.1. activity implemented as a limited Fund project selection.
92.2.1. activity of the project application, the applicant may be public bodies in the exercise of State migration and asylum policy and take inventory of the population in the country.
93.2.1. activity in the project within the allowed measures to introduce and implement the tools for collecting the information and analysis of third-country nationals at national and regional level.
94. the project application must be made for this activity 2.1. rule 93 of the measures referred to in paragraph and should reach 90. these provisions referred to monitoring indicators.
95. in the context of the activity 2.1 the available funding is $50 602, consisting of 37 951 dollar fund and the State budget financing in the amount of LVL 12 651. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
96. the minimum activity 2.1 available funding one project to cover the eligible cost is $14 056.
97. the project submissions 2.1. activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, and the quality of the evaluation criteria set out in annex 7 of these rules.
XII. implementation of activity 2.2 and project evaluation criteria application 98.  2.2. the purpose of the activity is to create monitoring tools and evaluation schemes for integration policies adjusted and progress of immigrant integration and more efficient use of the available resources and methods.
99.2.2. activity monitoring can leverage the following indicators: 99.1. develop monitoring and evaluation indicators and monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the integration measures implementation and integration policy;
99.2. developed and tested methods for the implementation of monitoring and evaluation.
100.2.2 the activity is implemented as a more limited application.
101.2.2. activity of the applicant in the project can be public bodies in the exercise of State policy in the area of integration of society and contribute to the development of civil society and intercultural dialogue, coordinated support system development, to promote the successful integration of immigrants into society.
102.2.2. activity of the project within the allowed actions: 102.1. to strengthen the ability to coordinate, implement, monitor and evaluate the integration of third-country nationals policy implementation;
102.2. introducing and implementing tools for information gathering and analysis at national and regional level for third-country nationals.
103.2.2. activities the project submission must include all these rules 102. measures referred to in points and reached all these rules referred to in paragraph 99 of the monitoring indicators.
104. activities under 2.2, the available funding is the equivalent of 21 084 lats after the Bank of Latvia exchange rate the Fund is 15 813 lats and State budget funds in the amount of 5 271 pounds. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
105.2.2. activity minimum available funding one project to cover the eligible cost is $14 056.
106. submissions of projects 2.2. activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, the quality of the assessment criteria laid down in these rules, annex 8 and the specific evaluation criteria set out in annex 2 to these rules.
XIII. activities and implementation 3.1 project submission evaluation criteria 107.  3.1. the purpose of the activity is to strengthen the capacity to coordinate, implement, monitor and evaluate the integration of third-country nationals in the various measures of public administration and service delivery levels, as well as to strengthen the intercultural dialogue of participating specialist skills in the management of cultural diversity.
108.3.1. activity reached such a monitoring indicator – developed and implemented at least one intercultural training program for professionals in different areas.
109.3.1. activity is implemented as an open Fund project application selection.

110.3.1. activity fund project application, applicants and their partners can be public authorities and public-law legal persons, associations and foundations, universities and international organizations.
111.3.1. activity in the framework of the project, the following measures: 111.1. measures which will establish and implement intercultural training system;
111.2. training and specialist competence on immigration issues training and intercultural communication.
112. in the framework of the activity 3.1 available funding is $63 533, consisting of Foundation funding 47 650 lats and State budget funding 15 883 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
113. the minimum activity 3.1 available funding one project application to cover the eligible costs are $14 056.
114. the project application can be implemented within the framework of the courses and programs that are developed in advance. Training course or the escalation costs must not exceed 20% of the development costs. Training course or program is considered updated when changes to the content of more than 10% but not more than 50% of its volume. Training course or programme in which the changes does not exceed 10%, shall be deemed to be not escalated, but the training course or programme in which the changes exceed 50%, considered to be new.
115. in the framework of the activity 3.1 training course or a minimum of 30 hours.
116. project submissions 3.1. activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, the quality of the assessment criteria laid down in annex 9 of these regulations, and the specific evaluation criteria set out in annex 2 to these rules.
XIV. 3.2 implementation of the activity and project evaluation criteria the application 117.3.2. the purpose of the activity is to support the development of non-governmental organisations, which shall contribute to the bilateral processes, creating a platform for consultation of third-country nationals, as well as a platform for dialogue between different cultures, religions and faith communities.
118.3.2 activity can leverage the following monitoring indicators: 118.1. non-governmental organizations within the create platform for dialogue with third country nationals at least two different target groups (for example, by ethnic origin);
118.2. supported at least five non-governmental organizations in the promotion of competence to work with third-country nationals.
119.3.2 activity implemented as an open Fund project application selection.
120.3.2 activity fund project applicants and their partners can be public authorities and public-law legal persons, associations and foundations, universities and international organizations.
121.3.2. activity in the project within the allowed actions: 121.1. promoting the involvement of non-governmental organizations who are nationals of third countries in the improvement of the integration process, creating a platform for dialogue with third country nationals (for example, minority organizations involvement in intercultural dialogue with third country nationals and the practical support of the Latvian culture and language learning);
121.2. to improve the competence of non-governmental organisations working with third-country nationals (for example, the exchange of experience between organisations already working with third-country nationals and the organizations who have little experience or are they just started work in this area).
122.3.2. activities within available funding is $50 883, formed by the Fund of 38 162 lats and State budget funds 12 721 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
123.3.2 the minimum activity available funding one project to cover the eligible cost is $14 056.
124. the project submissions 3.2 activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, the quality of the assessment criteria laid down in this provision 10. Annex and the specific evaluation criteria set out in annex 2 to these rules.
XV. implementation of the activity 4.1 and project submission evaluation criteria 125.  4.1. the purpose of the activity is to learn the different countries of the European Union the best experience and practice the effective functioning of third-country nationals integration systems and analyze the opportunity to experience gained in Latvia.
126.4.1. activity reached such a monitoring indicator – at least 20 professionals who work with third country nationals trained in other Member States ' experience in the integration of third-country nationals policy.
127.4.1. activity is implemented as a more limited application.
128.4.1. activity of the applicant in the project can be public bodies in the exercise of State policy in the area of integration of society and contribute to the development of civil society and intercultural dialogue, coordinated support system development, to promote the successful integration of immigrants into society.
129.4.1. activity of the project within the allowed actions that promote the exchange of information and best practices and cooperation with the Member States in relation to third-country nationals integration policy, the development and implementation of measures.
130.4.1 project activity in the application of this provision must be made for all the measures referred to in paragraphs 129 and reached 126 these provisions the monitoring referred to in paragraph.
131. within the framework of the activity 4.1 funding available is 28 112 lats, which consists of 21 084 Fund lats and State budget funding 7 028 lats. In addition to the Fund and the State budget for the financing of the project can be linked to project the financial resources of the applicant.
132. the minimum activity 4.1 funding available per project to cover the eligible cost is $14 056.
133. project submissions 4.1. activity valued in accordance with the administrative evaluation criteria set out in annex 1 of these regulations, and the quality of the evaluation criteria set out in annex 11 of these regulations.
XVI. 134. Project implementation Project, the applicant is directly responsible for the preparation of the application projects, project management, implementation, and project objectives and results.

135. in the implementation of the open Fund project application selection, project applications may require that the project will be implemented in collaboration with partners. Partners must meet all the requirements of the project.
136. in implementing the Fund's limited application of the selection of projects, the project partners are not involved.
137. in the implementation of the open Fund project application selection, partner relations with the leading body representing the project applicant, the obligations of the managing authority is the only project applicant. Partners (all together) may enforce a maximum of 30% of the project activities and receive up to 30% of the funding for the implementation of the project.
138. in the framework of the Fund attributable to the direct and indirect costs according to the provisions of the costs of the Fund (annex 15). The project, the applicant shall prepare detailed cost estimates that expenditure corresponds to income.
139. when implementing the project, according to the direct eligible costs of the project are less than the estimated cost of the application, the managing authority shall take a decision on the project's indirect eligible costs in proportion to the reduction of indirect eligible costs does not exceed that given in annex 15, the proportion of projects carried out under the direct eligible costs.
140. when implementing the project, it is noted that subcontracting will exceed 40% of the direct eligible costs, the beneficiary before subcontracting shall inform the managing authority by giving the reasons for the excess. The managing authority shall grant, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Treaty, overrun the grounds look, in assessing whether the activities that are intended to be implemented through appropriate subcontracts, the beneficiary or its partners may implement more effective and better, or subcontracting is necessary for the implementation of specific activities and whether or not it is in violation of this provision in paragraph 137. If the managing authority agrees to increase the proportion of subcontractors, it shall issue a written consent for subcontracting. If the managing authority does not agree to increase the proportion of subcontractors, it does not harmonise the subcontractors and send a written report to the recipient of the funding. If the beneficiary has entered into subcontracts, but failed to overrun the grounds leading body, the managing authority the amount of the excess is considered to be not relevant to your expenses.
141. The value added tax payments to fund the project plan as the eligible costs, if the beneficiary of the value added tax cannot be recovered under the laws and regulations in the field of taxation.
142. The funding recipient, conclude agreements on the implementation of project activities, must ensure transparency, free competition and the optimal use of the resources of the Fund and of the principle of public procurement laws and regulatory requirements.
143. The beneficiary is not subject to public procurement laws and regulations governing contracts for the implementation of project activities to 3514 lats (without value added tax), ensure transparency, free competition and the optimal use of resources of the Fund. Goods or services contracts with a value of less than 50 000 LVL (without value added tax) may be closed, if the beneficiary has received at least three quotes.
144. the planned remuneration does not exceed the project application project or partners of the applicant pay for similar work and have no more than six pounds an hour (not including the State of the employer social security contributions), excluding payment for overtime work. For overtime pay in accordance with the labour law governing laws and regulations.
145. The beneficiary be permitted to participate in the taking of a decision on the conclusion of the contract, and contracts (except contracts of employment agreement for additional work or overtime work) with people who are project partners or of the applicant's employees, members, officers, volunteers, or their spouses, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren, brothers, sisters, half-brothers or half-sisters, adoptive or adopted, or with economic operators, associations and foundations whose members, shareholders or members of the Board are persons mentioned in this paragraph.
146. The beneficiary may enter into contracts for the performance of duties provided for in the project the implementation of the project with the cooperation partners, officers, members or volunteers, all with one person contracts the total does not exceed this provision specified in paragraph 143, and the contract amount is taken into account in calculating the cooperation partners in the amount of funds transferred under this provision in paragraph 137.
XVII. Technical assistance activities 147. implementation of technical assistance activities implemented by the management of such funds, participating in the control and supervision of public administration authorities (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authorities): 147.1. the managing authority;
147.2. audit authority;
147.3. certification authority.
148. The technical assistance activities for the maximum available funding for the Foundation's annual programs Fund. For technical assistance funding distribution between the managing authority, the audit authority and certification authority agreed the Fund Management Committee.
149. The technical assistance activities for the implementation of the related expenditure shall cover 100% of the financing of the Fund.
150. in order to ensure that the audit authority and the certifying authority for technical assistance activities, as well as proper audit and certification authority function separation, the managing authority with the audit authority and certification authority concluded an agreement on the audit authority and the certifying authority for technical assistance activities.
151. in order to ensure the managing authorities for the implementation of technical assistance activities, the managing authority shall issue internal regulations, which shall be determined by the managing authority for technical assistance and monitoring of project implementation modalities, as well as the amendments to the order of the managing authorities of the technical assistance project.
152. the managing authority of the rules referred to in paragraph 150. agreements concluded and this provision in paragraph 151 of internal regulatory acts issued for the implementation of all programmes.

153. the amendment of the technical assistance projects carried out by the responsible authorities of the proposal by amending the provisions of the agreement referred to in paragraph 150, or by order of the managing authorities of the technical assistance project. The responsible authorities received a proposal to amend the technical assistance project, the managing authority shall assess compliance with the proposed amendments of the regulations, the cost of the foundation year programme and other Fund regulatory legislation and prepare amendments to the agreement or the draft amendments of the order or send a letter, which informed that amendments do not comply with the rules, the costs of the Fund annual programs, and other Fund regulatory legislation and not eligible.
XVII. The final question to be 154. unenforceable in the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 October 2008 Regulation No 884 "solidarity and management of migration flows framework programme 2007-2013 of the European integration of third-country nationals Fund project selection and the technical assistance for the implementation of the activity" (Latvian journal, 2008, no. 170).
Prime Minister v. Minister of culture Mr Dombrovskis jaunzeme-grende. Annex 1: Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund's activities, project submissions administrative evaluation criteria no PO box
Criteria may/may not (P), (N) to clarify the application of the project of the Fund 1.
The project application has been submitted for the tender advertisement or invitation to tender within the time limit set in the N 2.
The project applicant or the authorized person has submitted draft submissions personally or sent by mail in a sealed package, or send an electronic document signed with a secure electronic signature and add a time stamp N 3.
The project application is fully completed, then add all of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter-the rules) are mentioned in Annex N 4.
The project application has been designed according to the requirements of the rules N 5.
The project the project attached to the application of the electronic version of the application, and it fully complies with the original submission of the project (if applicable) N 6.
The project application is drawn up into N 7.
Project submission is prepared in Latvian language N 8.
The applicant and its project partners meet the requirements of the rules N 9.
The project application is signed by the officer in accordance with regulations N 10.
If the applicant has been a project applicant in another Fund annual program, it's up to the date of submission of the application for the project has not repaid expenses incurred if the managing authority has requested N 11.
The applicant and its project partners do not have tax debt N 12.
The applicant and its project partners are not declared insolvent, including not in rehabilitation process and is not in liquidation (public administrations, local authorities and public-law legal entities under this criterion does not evaluate) N 13.
One of the Fund's activity within the project, the applicant has submitted one application for the project N 14.
The project budget is balanced (total cost corresponds to the total), and it costs less than one project specific activities within the funding available P 15.
The project application of financial calculations, including the Fund and the State budget, the amount of funding, have been drawn up in dollars and is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed P 16.
The project's eligible costs specified in the application to meet the costs referred to in the regulations, P 17.
The project specified in the application to the subcontracting aspect ratio does not exceed the proportion referred to in the provisions or the project attached to the application, detailed written justification provide sufficient explanation of the subcontracting aspect ratio exceeded P 18.
The project submission complies with the proportion of financing and implementation part can put partners P 19.
Project calendar plan reasonable and sufficient time to implement the project P 20.
The project is in compliance with the Foundation's application to the territorial limitation of P 21.
Project submission (or individual measures contained therein) is not filed or approved for funding from other sources, except in the case of the managing authority before the submission of the project application selection it already rejected 22 N.
The project planned in the contract list corresponds to the project's activities, the Fund's project budget estimate and a detailed cost estimate and is properly designed, the chosen procurement procedures comply with the laws and regulations in the area of procurement, Minister of culture s P jaunzeme-grende annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund's activities, project specific application evaluation criteria no PO box
Criterion points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project of the Foundation of the project application 1 contribution to address policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/N 1.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the project's application 1.2 0 solves the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the However, the proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 1.3. project submissions will address the integration of the public defined the problem of integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems of innovation and new 5 2. methods of application of the measures under the project: P 0-5 2/2.1. submission of draft measures planned are not innovative and use new methods 0 2.2. less than half of the planned measures in the application is innovative and provides new methods 2 2.3. most of the project's planned activities in the application are innovative and provides new methods all project submissions 4 2.4. the planned measures are innovative and provides new methods, and they are an effective solution for project objectives 5 3. Project results and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/3.1.

the project submission does not describe how the applicant plans to project to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 3.2. project application describes how the applicant plans to project to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the project the applicant's logistical, personnel and financial security of the project results for further use 3 3.3. project application describes how the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved Describes the project, including the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in 5 below 0-15 together cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 European integration of third-country nationals Fund 2010 program activity 1.1 "application development and efforts to promote the newly arrived third-country nationals in the host society for the adaptation, and help them to learn the Latvian language , knowledge of Latvian history, institutions, socio-economic characteristics, cultural life, etc. "project submission quality evaluation criteria (open the project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. implementation: the project application to the 0-5 1/N 2.1. not to contribute to the achievement of the activity monitoring indicator 0 2.2. contribute to one activity monitoring indicator of achievement
1 2.3. contribute to two activities achieve 3 monitoring indicator 2.4. contributes to the three or four activity monitoring indicator achievement 5 3. the measures provided for in the project application: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the rules allowed measures laid down but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules established for the measures and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target, background and characteristics are expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely, but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project funds: 0-5-0/P 6.1. not specified 0 is specified in 6.2. but clearly not 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not make sense (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2 provides an example of the results of the project and the achievement of the improvements (benefits) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv) monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project and the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency , experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partly enough project However, the requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partially sufficient for the purposes of the project, the requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and corresponds to the description of duties as well as the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget is not sufficient, 9.2 0 but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully 5 10.

Application of the project planned project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1.0 is not defined is defined, however, the 10.2 project description of monitoring does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 are clearly defined, provide for effective control of the implementation of the project and the beneficiary of the Foundation's control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity measures : 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 cost is proportionate 12.2. meet the Fund project, the specific nature and purpose, have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target groups: 3 P 0-5/0 is not defined 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3 is clearly and unambiguously defined and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 5 no PO box
Project submission quality evaluation criteria, defining the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 15. planned number of direct beneficiaries of all projects of the Foundation planned events in General: 1 – 5 1/P 15.1. up to 50 (including) people are 51-99 1 15.2. (including) people 2 100-149 15.3 (including) people have 150-200 3 15.4 (including) people are more than 200 15.5.4 people 5 16.
Application of the draft guidance on the impact of the measures taken by the availability and quality of services to third-country nationals: 0-5 0/P 16.1. not included 0 16.2. are included, but are not detailed and clearly describe the project's impact on the availability and quality of services to third-country nationals are covered, 16.3 2 are detailed and clearly describe the project's impact on the availability and quality of services to third-country nationals provides for the application of the project 5 17. new or existing adaptation programmes and organizing the following vulnerable third countries ' national groups: 0-5, 1/P 17.1. None of the criteria listed in the mazaizsargātaj 17.4. third-country nationals groups 0 17.2. one to two of the criteria mentioned in the mazaizsargātaj 17.4. third-country nationals, groups 1 17.3. three to four of the criteria mentioned in the mazaizsargātaj 17.4. third-country nationals, groups 3 women, 17.4. children, young people, older people, people with disabilities, people with low education level 5 Culture Minister jaunzeme-grende s annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 European third country nationals Integration Fund 2010 program activity 1.2 "improving the access of third-country nationals in the public and private services and products, as well as to help them to integrate into Latvian society by providing mediation services and necessary advice" project submission quality evaluation criteria (limited project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application Project implementation: N 0-5 5/2.1 does not contribute to the achievement of the activity monitoring indicator 0 2.2. all activities contribute to the achievement of the monitoring indicators
5 3. the measures provided for in the project application: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the regulations set out the measures to be allowed, but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules laid down for measures allowed and is clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, the justification and the characterization is expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information 5 6.

Project submission in mutual linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the Fund's project: 0 P 0-5/0 is specified for 6.1 6.2 is specified, but no clear 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not make sense (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2 provides an example project results achieved improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect is displayed to sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3.
is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partially sufficient for the purposes of the project, the requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and corresponds to the description of duties as well as the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget is not sufficient, 9.2 0 but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring : 0 – 3 1/P 10.1 10.2.0 is not defined is defined, but not the surveillance project description provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 is clearly defined and ensure effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity measures : 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 cost is proportionate 12.2. meet the Fund project, the specific nature and purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target groups: 3 P 0-5/0 is not defined 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3 is clear and unambiguous formulated and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. application of Project investment to address the policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/N 15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the project application 15.2 0 address defined in the area of integration of society challenges for the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 submission of the project addressed 15.3 public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems of innovation and new 5 16. methods of application of the draft measures : P 0-5 2/16.1. application of the project planned activities are not innovative and use new methods 0 16.2. less than half of the planned measures in the application is innovative and provides new methods 2 16.3. most of the project's planned activities in the application is innovative and provides new methods all project submissions 4 16.4. the planned measures are innovative and provides new methods they are an effective solution for the Foundation for the attainment of the objectives of the project. The results of the project 5 17 use and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/17.1. project application does not describe how the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 17.2.

project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the project the applicant's logistical, personnel and financial security of the project results for further use of the project submission 17.3.3 describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in no further use in 5 BC
Project submission quality evaluation criteria, defining the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 18. application for project cooperation in the implementation of project activities: 0-5 0/P 18.1. the project activities are not intended to cooperate with the competent authorities 0 18.2. project activities involving two of 18.3. institutions referred to in criterion 2 18.3. project implementation of measures intended to cooperate with the competent authorities : State bodies, municipalities, non-governmental organisations 5 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s 5. Annex to the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 European integration of third-country nationals Fund 2010 program activity 1.3 "to develop programmes of education or jauniešiem1-adaptation third-country nationals ' quality evaluation criteria (limited project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application Project implementation: N 0-5 5/2.1 does not contribute to the achievement of the activity monitoring indicator 0 2.2. all activities contribute to the achievement of the monitoring indicators
5 3. the measures provided for in the project application: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the regulations set out the measures to be allowed, but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules laid down for measures allowed and is clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, the justification and the characterization is expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the Fund's project: 0 P 0-5/0 is specified for 6.1 6.2 is specified, but no clear 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators : P 0-5 2/7.1 do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to an identified condition and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2 provides an example of the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to an identified condition and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to an identified condition and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified duties or requirements not defined If the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the project have been defined in General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partly enough project the requirements are defined, clear and comply with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget 0 9.2.

not enough, but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1.0 is not defined is defined, however, the 10.2 project description of monitoring does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 is clearly defined and ensure effective control of the implementation of the project and beneficiaries of the Fund control measures taken and costs 3 11. project publicity measures: 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application : 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0. cost is proportionate 12.2, comply with the nature of the project and of the Foundation purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target group : P 0-5 3/0 is not defined in 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency in achieving the target group 3 13.3 is clear and explicit and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency in achieving the target group of the project application in the 5 14. risks associated with the implementation of the project : 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. investment project application to address policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/N 15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the project application 15.2 0 address in the area of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 submission of the project addressed 15.3 public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems of innovation and new 5 16. methods of application of the draft measures: 0-5 2/P 16.1. application of the project planned activities are not innovative and use new methods 0 16.2. less than half of the planned measures in the application is innovative and provides new methods 2 16.3.
most of the measures planned in the application is innovative and provides new methods all project submissions 4 16.4. the planned measures are innovative and provides new methods, they are an effective solution for the Foundation for the attainment of the objectives of the project. The results of the project 5 17 use and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/17.1. project application does not describe how the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 17.2. the project is described in the application as the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the project the applicant's logistical, personnel and financial security of the project results for further use of the project submission 17.3.3 describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in no further use in 5 BC
Project submission quality evaluation criteria, defining the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 18. Intercultural learning program development project applicant: P 0-5 2/18.1. not planning to collect and analyze the immigrant, the competent national authorities, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, as well as the latest research results 0 18.2 planned to collect and analyze three of the criteria mentioned in 18.3. opinions 2 18.3. a plan to collect and analyze immigrant the competent national regulatory authorities, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, as well as the latest research results in accordance with the law for youth 5 1 target group are persons aged between 13 and 25 years old.
Culture Minister jaunzeme-grende s annex 6 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 rules no. 964 of third-country nationals integration fund 2010 application 1.4. activities "to promote a more favourable treatment in the host society, migration as well as measures of integration through education campaigns, especially in the media," the project submission quality evaluation criteria (limited project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application Project implementation: N 0-5 5/2.1 does not contribute to the achievement of the activity monitoring indicator 0 2.2. all activities contribute to the achievement of the monitoring indicators
5 3. the measures provided for in the project application: P 0-5 2/3.1.

does not comply with the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the regulations set out the measures to be allowed, but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules established for the measures and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project objectives and expected results of the project application in 5 4. : 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target, background and characteristics are expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information proving the project submission the information on the validity of the application of the project 5 5. problem: 0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely, but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation , identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the Fund's project: 0 P 0-5/0 is specified for 6.1 6.2 is specified, but no clear 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not make sense (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2 provides an example of the results of the project the improvements achieved, (benefits) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency , experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partly enough project However, the requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partially sufficient for the purposes of the project, the requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and corresponds to the description of duties as well as the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget is not sufficient, 9.2 0 but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring : 0 – 3 1/P 10.1 10.2.0 is not defined is defined, but not the surveillance project description provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 is clearly defined and ensure effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity measures : 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 cost is proportionate 12.2. meet the Fund project, the specific nature and purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target groups: 3 P 0-5/0 is not defined 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3 is clear and unambiguous formulated and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. application of Project investment to address the policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/n

15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the project application 15.2 0 address defined in the area of integration of society challenges for the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 submission of the project addressed 15.3 public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems of innovation and new 5 16. methods of application of the draft measures : P 0-5 2/16.1. application of the project planned activities are not innovative and use new methods 0 16.2. less than half of the planned measures in the application is innovative and provides new methods 2 16.3. most of the project's planned activities in the application is innovative and provides new methods all project submissions 4 16.4. the planned measures are innovative and provides new methods they are an effective solution for the Foundation for the attainment of the objectives of the project. The results of the project 5 17 use and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/17.1. project application does not describe how the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 17.2. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the applicant's logistic project financial security, personnel and project results for further use of the project submission 17.3.3 describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in no further use in 5 BC
Project submission quality evaluation criteria, defining the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 18. project submissions in the planned public information activities: 0 – 5 1/P 18.1. not planned to implement public awareness measures 0 18.2 planned to implement three different public awareness measures 18.3. implement 1 planned four different public awareness measures planned to implement the 18.4 2 five different public awareness measures 5 19 application project into training for third-country nationals living issues involved representatives from the mass media of Latvia: 0-5 1/P 19.1. are planned to involve representatives from the mass media of Latvia 0 19.2 involved representatives of the five Latvian media 1 19.3 involved representatives from six Latvian media 2 19.4. involved representatives from seven Latvian media 5 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s annex 7 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 rules no. 964 of third-country nationals integration fund 2010 program activity 2.1 "information technology systems effective integration of third-country nationals policy planning and adaptation to the needs of immigrants "project submission quality evaluation criteria (limited project application selection) no project application, PO box general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meeting the purpose of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application Project implementation: N 0-5 5/2.1 does not contribute to the achievement of the activity monitoring indicator 0 2.2. all activities contribute to the achievement of the monitoring indicator 5 3. the measures provided for in the project application: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the rules set the measures, but are not allowed and clearly justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules established for the measures and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs, and also provides a description of the target, background and characteristics are expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely, but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the project funds: 0-5-0/P 6.1. not specified 0 is specified in 6.2. but clearly not 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators: 0-5 2/P 7.1. do not make sense (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2.

provides an example of the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect is displayed to sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3.
is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partially sufficient for the purposes of the project, the requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and corresponds to the description of duties as well as the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget is not sufficient, 9.2 0 but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring : 0 – 3 1/P 10.1 10.2.0 is not defined is defined, but not the surveillance project description provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 is clearly defined and ensure effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity measures : 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 cost is proportionate 12.2. meet the Fund project, the specific nature and purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target groups: 3 P 0-5/0 is not defined 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3 is clear and unambiguous formulated and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. application of Project investment to address the policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/n 15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the project application 15.2 0 address defined in the area of integration of society challenges for the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 submission of the project addressed 15.3 public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems of innovation and new 5 16. methods of application of the draft measures : P 0-5 2/16.1. application of the project planned activities are not innovative and use new methods 0 16.2. less than half of the planned measures in the application is innovative and provides new methods 2 16.3. most of the project's planned activities in the application is innovative and provides new methods all project submissions 4 16.4. the planned measures are innovative and provides new methods they are an effective solution for the Foundation for the attainment of the objectives of the project. The results of the project 5 17 use and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/17.1. project application does not describe how the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 17.2. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the applicant's logistic project financial security, personnel and project results for further use of the project submission 17.3.3 describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in no further use in 5 BC
Application of the project quality criteria that determine the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points

The minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 18. application of the project planned to establish and maintain a data environment: 0-5 2/P 18.1. the project is not described in the application, what media will be created and how it will improve and refine the integration process 0 18.2. data environment designed to collect statistical data on immigrants and different ways to work with it, but the project is not described in the application How to create the data environment will improve and streamline the process of integration 2 18.3. media designed to collect statistical data on immigrants and different ways to process it, resulting in possible to analyze the data in depth, the immigrants by improving and furthering the process of integration 5 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s Annex 8 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 rules no. 964 of third-country nationals integration fund 2010 program activity 2.2 "monitoring tool and evaluation scheme development integration policy and implement integration measures" project submission quality evaluation criteria (limited the project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application Project implementation: N 0-5 5/2.1 does not contribute to the achievement of the activity monitoring indicator 0 2.2. all activities contribute to the achievement of the monitoring indicators
5 3. the measures provided for in the project application: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the regulations set out the measures to be allowed, but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules laid down for measures allowed and is clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, the justification and the characterization is expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the Fund's project: 0 P 0-5/0 is specified for 6.1 6.2 is specified, but no clear 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators : P 0-5 2/7.1 do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2 provides an example of the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified duties or requirements not defined If the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the project have been defined in General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partly enough project the requirements are defined, clear and comply with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget 0 9.2 is not sufficient. but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1.0 is not defined is defined, however, the 10.2 project description of monitoring does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3.

is clearly defined and ensure effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity: 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application : 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0. cost is proportionate 12.2, comply with the nature of the project and of the Foundation purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target group : P 0-5 3/0 is not defined in 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3. is clear and explicit and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project : 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. investment project application to address policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/n 15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the project application 15.2 0 address in the area of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 submission of the project addressed 15.3 public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems of innovation and new 5 16. methods of application of the draft measures: 0-5 2/P 16.1. application of the project planned activities are not innovative and use new methods 0 16.2. less than half of the planned measures in the application is innovative and provides new methods 2 16.3.
most of the measures planned in the application is innovative and provides new methods all project submissions 4 16.4. the planned measures are innovative and provides new methods, they are an effective solution for the Foundation for the attainment of the objectives of the project. The results of the project 5 17 use and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/17.1. project application does not describe how the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 17.2. the project is described in the application as the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the project the applicant's logistical, personnel and financial security of the project results for further use of the project submission 17.3.3 describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in no further use in 5 BC
Application of the project quality criteria that determine the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project applicant Project 18. cooperation with Government and municipal institutions for the establishment of indicator system: 0-2/3 P 0 has 18.1 18.2 is expected, but they are not described clearly and in detail or not enough effective activity of the objective 2 plan to 18.3. and they are described clearly and in detail and is sufficient for effective activities objective 3 19. applicant's Project experience in the development of indicators of integration: 0-5 3/P 19.1. not specified in the project application form 0 is specified in the project's 19.2. application form, indicating the specific models 3 19.3.
is clearly indicated in the project application form, indicating the specific models 5 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s 9. attachment of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 rules no. 964 of third-country nationals integration fund 2010 program activity 3.1 "to develop and implement training courses for employees of public authorities, representatives of local authorities, social workers, medical staff, NGOs and representatives of international organisations, etc. professionals who provide services to migrants" project submission quality evaluation criteria (open the project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. Application Project implementation: N 0-5 5/2.1 does not contribute to the achievement of the activity monitoring indicator 0 2.2. activity monitoring contributes to the attainment of indicators 5
 
3. the measures provided for in the project application: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the regulations set out the measures to be allowed, but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3.

comply with the rules established for the measures and is authorized and clearly justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, the justification and the characterization is expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the Fund's project: 0 P 0-5/0 is specified for 6.1 6.2 is specified, but no clear 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators : P 0-5 2/7.1 do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2 provides an example of the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified duties or requirements not defined If the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the project have been defined in General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partly enough project the requirements are defined, clear and comply with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget 0 9.2 is not sufficient. but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1.0 is not defined is defined, however, the 10.2 project description of monitoring does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 is clearly defined and ensure effective implementation of the project control and Fund the requested funding control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity: 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 cost is proportionate 12.2. meet the Fund project, the specific nature and purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target groups: 3 P 0-5/0 is not defined 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3 is clear and unambiguous formulated and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 5 no PO box
Project submission quality evaluation criteria, defining the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 15 planned to develop and implement the training program: 0-5 0/P 15.1. professionals from one sector, referred to in criterion 0 15.2 15.4. specialists from two to three branches mentioned in criterion 2 15.4 15.3. professionals from four industries referred to in criterion 4 15.4 15.4.

professionals associated with the employment of immigrants, health, security, civil and political participation issues in the application of the project 5 16. indication of the impact of the measures taken on the availability and quality of services to third-country nationals: 0-5 0/P 16.1. not included 0 16.2. are included, but are not detailed and clearly describe the project's impact on the availability and quality of services to third-country nationals 2 includes 16.3. , is a detailed and clear description of the project's impact on the availability and quality of services to third-country nationals 5 17. Intercultural learning program development project applicant: P 0-5 2/17.1. no plan to collect and analyze the immigrant, the competent national authorities, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, as well as the latest research results 0 17.2. a plan to collect and analyze three of the criteria mentioned in 18.3. opinions 2 17.3. planned to collect and analyze the immigrant the competent national regulatory authorities, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, as well as the latest research results 5 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s annex 10 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 rules no. 964 of third-country nationals integration fund 2010 program activity 3.2 "the involvement of non-governmental organizations in building intercultural dialogue between Latvia and third-country nationals and third country nationals, promoting active citizenship" project submission quality evaluation criteria (open the project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and consistent with the purpose of the activity 5 2. implementation: the project application to the 0-5 3/N 2.1. activities not contributing towards monitoring indicator 0 2.2. contributes to one of the activities to achieve the monitoring indicators
3 2.3. contribute to two activities in achieving the monitoring indicator 5 3. the measures provided for in the project application: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the regulations set out the measures to be allowed, but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules laid down for measures allowed and is clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, the justification and the characterization is expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the Fund's project: 0 P 0-5/0 is specified for 6.1 6.2 is specified, but no clear 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators : P 0-5 2/7.1 do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2 provides an example of the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect, have displayed their sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified duties or requirements not defined If the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3. is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the project have been defined in General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partly enough project the requirements are defined, clear and comply with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and meet the responsibilities, as well as for the description of the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget 0

 
9.2. is not enough, but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring: 0 – 3 1/P 10.1.0 is not defined is defined, however, the 10.2 project description of monitoring does not provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 is clearly defined and ensure effective implementation of the project control and financing of the Fund requested control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity: 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application : 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0. cost is proportionate 12.2, comply with the nature of the project and of the Foundation purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target group : P 0-5 3/0 is not defined in 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3. is clear and explicit and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project : 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 5 no PO box
Project submission quality evaluation criteria, defining the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to specify the project's application 15. project activities in the participating organisations: 0-5 0/P 15.1. project the applicant does not intend to implement the project in cooperation with non-governmental organisations project applicant 15.2.0 intends to implement the project in cooperation with non-governmental organisations one 1 15.3. project applicant intends to implement the project in cooperation with two non-governmental organizations 2 15.4. project applicant intends to implement the project in cooperation with the three non-governmental organizations 4 15.5. project applicant intends to implement the project in cooperation with four non-governmental organisations 5 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s annex 11 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 rules no. 964 of third-country nationals integration fund 2010 4.1. activity "effective functioning of integration Assistance policy, through exchanges of experience and good practices with other Member States ' submissions on the quality of the project evaluation criteria (limited project application selection) no PO box
Application of project general quality evaluation criteria points the minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project the project submission 1 General and specific goal: 0-5 2/N 1.1. not defined or does not meet the purpose of the activity 0 1.2. clearly defined but meet the objective of the activity 2 1.3. clearly defined and meet the objective of the activity of the project application, 5 2. implementation: 0 – 3 1/N 2.1. don't give investment activity monitoring indicator achievement 0 2.2. contributes to one of the activities to achieve the monitoring indicators
1 2.3. contribute two activity monitoring indicator 3 3. application of the project in achieving the measures provided for in: 0-5 2/P 3.1 does not match the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter referred to as the rules) specified the measures allowed 0 3.2. meet the regulations set out the measures to be allowed, but not clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 2 3.3. comply with the rules laid down for measures allowed and is clearly and unequivocally justified the need for the project and the achievement of planned results 5 4 application project: 0-5 2/P 4.1 does not justify the chosen target group needs and is delivered target groups description 0 4.2. justify the chosen target group needs, and also provides a description of the target group, however, the rationale and the description is General 2 4.3 based the selected target group needs as well as, provide a description of the target group, the justification and the characterization is expanded and enough to give clear references to the used sources of statistical data and other information to demonstrate the application of the project the validity of the information on the application of project problem 5 5:0-5 2/P 5.1 is not defined and justified 0 5.2 is not completely defined, as well as provide only general reasoning 2 5.3 is defined completely but is only general reasoning 3 5.4 is defined completely, as well as provide expanded rationale with clear references to sources of information the project submission 5 6. reciprocal linking with the existing situation, the identified challenges, objectives and planned results of the Fund's project: 0 P 0-5/0 is specified for 6.1 6.2 is specified, but no clear 2 6.3.5 7 is clearly indicated in the project application. project monitoring indicators : P 0-5 2/7.1 do not give a picture (not precisely defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects multiplikatīv) 0 7.2.

provides an example of the results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results and sustainability of the effects of multiplikatīv), monitoring indicators, however, are not precisely defined or measurable or not justified improvements impact 2 7.3. provide a clear picture (there are clearly defined and measurable) results of the project, the progress of improvement (gains) in relation to the identified situation and long-term effects (including results is multiplikatīv effect is displayed to sustainability) 5 8. selected staff (if attached to the CV) and fund the project application requirements defined in staff competency, experience and professional skills: 0-5, 1/P 8.1. is not sufficient because the requirements for the implementation of the project is not associated with the specified obligations or requirements is not defined, or the selected project staff education and experience does not meet the requirements for 0 is partially sufficient 8.2. the project, however, the requirements are defined in the General or selected project staff have no experience or training in relation to the duties entrusted to 1 8.3.
is partially sufficient, however, for the implementation of the draft requirements are defined in the General, and selected project staff have the appropriate education and experience relating to the duties entrusted to 2 8.4. is partially sufficient for the purposes of the project, the requirements are clearly defined and is consistent with the description of the tasks, project staff have selected the appropriate education but little experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 3 8.5. certify the ability to successfully implement the project, the requirements are clearly defined and corresponds to the description of duties as well as the selected project staff have the appropriate education and long experience in relation to the duties entrusted to 5 9. Project implementation requires the facilities: 0-5 2/P 9.1. and it will not be not sufficient for ensuring the project budget is not sufficient, 9.2 0 but it will ensure the project's budget is 9.3 part 2, but the project budget will be fully 3 9.4. is fully in the application of the project planned 5 10. project monitoring : 0 – 3 1/P 10.1 10.2.0 is not defined is defined, but not the surveillance project description provide a clear picture of how the requested funding will ensure the effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and costs 1 10.3 is clearly defined and ensure effective implementation of the project control and fund the requested control over the measures taken and the costs of the project 3 11. publicity measures : 0-3/0 P 0 not defined 11.1 11.2. are defined, but only provide some information about the project or the Fund will reach only a narrow range of 1 person is defined in 11.3, provides extensive information about the project and the Fund reaches a wide circle of persons 3 12. the budget of the project application: 0-7 2/P 12.1. costs are disproportionate and inadequate market prices 0 cost is proportionate 12.2. meet the Fund project, the specific nature and purpose and have the appropriate market prices, however, certain positions cost exceeds market price 2 12.3. the cost is proportionate and appropriate market prices in all cost positions are reasonable and comply with the specificities of the project of the Foundation and the objective of the project submission 7 13. methods for achieving the target groups: 3 P 0-5/0 is not defined 13.1 13.2 is formulated, however, do not create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 3 13.3 is clear and unambiguous formulated and create complete clarity about the eligibility of the methods planned project activities and efficiency to achieve the target group 5 14. submission Project risks associated with the implementation of the project: 0-5 2/P 14.1 is not described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 0 14.2. is partly described and partially developed risk mitigation or mitigation plan 2 14.3. are described and developed risk mitigation or mitigation plans 5 15. application of Project investment to address the policy planning documents in the field of integration of society define problems for the integration of third-country nationals: 0-5 2/n 15.1. the project submission does not address the public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals in the project application 15.2 0 address defined in the area of integration of society challenges for the integration of third-country nationals, but proposed solutions are not sufficient 2 submission of the project addressed 15.3 public defined integration problems of the integration of third-country nationals, and significantly contribute to solving problems of innovation and new 5 16. methods of application of the draft measures : P 0-5 2/16.1. application of the project planned activities are not innovative and use new methods 0 16.2. less than half of the planned measures in the application is innovative and provides new methods 2 16.3. most of the project's planned activities in the application is innovative and provides new methods all project submissions 4 16.4. the planned measures are innovative and provides new methods they are an effective solution for the Foundation for the attainment of the objectives of the project. The results of the project 5 17 use and sustainability further: P 0-5 3/17.1. project application does not describe how the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved 0 17.2. project application describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, however, does not provide information about the applicant's logistic project financial security, personnel and project results for further use of the project submission 17.3.3 describes how the project the applicant intends to maintain and further the use of the project results achieved, including the project described in the applicant's facilities, personnel and financial security for the use of the project results in no further use in 5 BC
Application of the project quality criteria that determine the project's compliance with the requirements of the activity points

The minimum number of points required and may indicate (P) or may not (N) to clarify the application of the project 18. project planned in the application, the number of specialists who will experience the integration of third-country nationals in other countries policy: 0-5 2/P 18.1. less than 20 professionals 0 18.2.20-25 experts 2 technicians and over 18.3.26 5 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s Ministry of culture submitted version of annex 12. Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s annex 13 Cabinet 2011 20. Regulation No 964 December cultural Minister jaunzeme-grende s 14. Annex to the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 partner certification I certify that: 1. the third country nationals Integration Fund (hereinafter Fund) in the implementation of the project will not be tolerated discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation or age, and will be provided equal opportunities for different groups in society;
2. prior to the application of the project's leading body I am familiar with the contents of the application for the project and their role in the implementation of the project;
3. authorized the applicant to conclude a draft grant agreement with the managing authority and represent all partners with the introduction of the project-related activities;
4. at least eight years after the completion of the project will keep all project implementation documentation and information and, if necessary, the uzrādīš, as well as agree with the Republic of Latvia or the representatives of the institutions of the European Union controls and audits before approving a project, the project during implementation and after completion of the project;
5. within the framework of the project or the stalls were deserted sold real estate before the implementation of a project are not bought with the financial support of the European Union;
6. If the partner has been a project applicant in another Fund annual program, it's up to the date of submission of the application for the project has not repaid expenses incurred if it is requested by the managing authority.
Partner institution (name) (signature) (date) Culture Minister jaunzeme-grende s 15. Annex to the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No 964 Fund cost provisions i. General provisions 1. Guiding principles 1.1. Project costs are eligible if they: 1.1.1. meet the objectives of the Fund;
1.1.2. within the framework of the measures have been set out in the Cabinet of Ministers of 20 December 2011 regulations No. 436 "rule for the European integration of third-country nationals in the 2010 program of the Fund for the implementation of activities" (hereinafter-the rules) with respect to a particular activity;
1.1.3. the need to fund the measures contained in the draft;
1.1.4. are reasonable and in accordance with the principles of sound financial management, in particular in relation to value for money and cost-effectiveness;
1.1.5. incurred in the beneficiary or his partners, which operates in the Republic of Latvia, except for the expenses that relate to international public sector organisations set up on the basis of intergovernmental agreements and special agencies set up by such organisations, as well as the International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Federation, and which works to achieve the same objectives as those rules. Rules on eligibility of expenditure are to be applied to the beneficiary and the relevant changes are also partner;
1.1.6. related to the Fund's target group;
1.1.7. incurred in accordance with the grant agreement.
1.2. the Fund supported projects cannot be financed from other sources of funding of the European Union. The Fund supported projects can be funded from the State budget, as well as other public and private funds.
2. Project budget 2.1. Project budget must be balanced – the total cost must be equal to the total amount of income.
2.2. Project costs broken down: 2.2.1. direct eligible project costs that are directly associated with the project;
2.2.2. indirect eligible project costs that are not directly related to the specific project.
2.3. the expenditure of the project including the project direct and indirect eligible costs, income of the project the European Union financing, the State budget funding, funding of the beneficiary, partner funding, third party funding and the project generated revenue.
2.4. the meaning of these provisions, revenue is income that the compliance referred to in paragraph 4 within the period of the project derive from the sales, rental, service or registration fees, and other similar income.
3. income and profit-making condition 3.1. Fund supports non-profit projects. If the income of the project, including the project revenue, resulting from the completion of the project exceeds the actual project undertaken in the relevant expenditure, the reduction of the Fund's investment in the project. All project income source shall be recorded in the beneficiary's accounts, and they must be identifiable and verifiable.
3.2. the Fund and the State budget funding contribution from the national budget, in application of the principle of non-profit, calculated on the total eligible costs minus the third-party beneficiary of investment, investment, investment partners and the project generated revenue.
4. Eligibility period 4.1. Payments made shall be (the exception is the depreciation write-downs) and relevant costs arise after 1 January of the year referred to in the financing decision that approved annual programme. Eligibility period is up to N1 + 2 30 June. This means that the project expenses must be incurred before that date. Payments can also be made by N1 + 2 June 30, but before the submission of the final report the managing body.
Note the. N1-Fund annual program started the year.
5. Expenditure accounts 5.1. expenditure corresponds to the direct beneficiaries of the payments made. They are a financial transaction except depreciation write-downs.
5.2. expenditure shall be justified by official invoices. If this is not possible, the expenditure is justified by accounting documents or supporting documents of equivalent probative value.
5.3. Costs are identifiable and verifiable. They are: the beneficiary specified in 5.3.1 accounting documents;

5.3.2. in accordance with the Republic of Latvia accounting standards and accounting regulatory laws, as well as according to the beneficiary's accounting practices;
5.3.3. the declared in accordance with the requirements of the tax and social regulations governing legislation.
5.4. reference data storage and processing complies with the laws and regulations in the field of data protection.
5.5. The beneficiary shall ensure a separate analytical accounting, computerized financial transactions incurred in connection with the Fund's project implementation activities.
5.6. The beneficiary shall ensure that after the conclusion of the contract of grant payments are made only from the project account. If the beneficiary of the project plans to make payments from another account, you need the agreement of the managing authority.
5.7. The beneficiary and its partners provide information storage on the project's technical and financial progress that is necessary for the provision of relevant news. Information accumulates the beneficiary and its partners records and accounting records, including electronic media.
5.8. Where appropriate, the beneficiaries are obliged to keep records of the certified copy of the affiliate income and expenditure to the appropriate project.
6. the territorial scope 6.1. Expenses are attributable to those beneficiaries and partners who are working and are registered in the Republic of Latvia, with the exception of the international intergovernmental organization dealing with the rules defined in these objectives.
6.2. the expenditure of the Fund meets the defined in paragraph 1.1.5. the beneficiary of the financing expenses.
6.3. Expenses incurred in the territory of the Member States of the European Union (excluding expenditure on the measures that the country of origin of persons who are not citizens of the European Union, are performed before removal and give them the opportunity to learn integration requires knowledge and skills, such as vocational training, the dissemination of information material, versatile patterns of civil courses and language teaching).
6.4. the project partners, registered and operating in third countries, can participate in the project without the cost, thus the following partners expenses not attributable. This does not apply to international intergovernmental organizations.
II. Direct eligible costs 7. Direct eligible costs are costs directly related to project implementation, and they include the project budget calculation.
8. Staff costs 8.1. project staff costs are all costs incurred on a contract basis. Project personnel costs are actual salaries plus social security charges and other statutory costs. Project personnel costs corresponding to the direct beneficiary's remuneration scheme, but not exceeding the rate laid down in these provisions.
8.2. Staff costs detailed description the detailed expense statement, specifying the functions, number and last name. If the names of persons not yet known or is unable to detect it, the project provided indications of the professional and technical qualifications, which will put relevant given the project's functions or tasks.
8.3. Project staff costs awarded, such as salaries and social security contributions, are eligible, provided that they do not exceed the beneficiary's remuneration scheme of the average rate. Where appropriate, you can specify the employer's contributions paid, excluding bonuses, incentive payments or profit-sharing schemes. The fees, taxes or charges (salaries applicable in particular direct taxes and social security payments) related to projects financed by the Fund shall be considered eligible only if they are actually incurred direct beneficiaries.
8.4. as regards international organizations, the relevant personnel costs may include legislation, the obligations and rights provided for in relation to remuneration.
8.5. the structure of the national staff salary costs is appropriate, insofar as they are related to the cost of activities that the public body does not perform, if it were not for the project. Such personnel moves or designated for the purposes of the project by writing directly on the receiver.
9. Travel and subsistence costs 9.1. Travel and subsistence costs are eligible direct costs: 9.1.1. only for staff involved in project activities and missions are required for the implementation of the project;
9.1.2. specifically justified cases, other persons participating in the activities of the project and that the mission is necessary for the implementation of the project;
9.1.3. in respect of persons who participate in the project's activities, if the beneficiary can present the attendance list.
9.2. Mission expenses is attributable, on the basis of actual costs. Expense reimbursement rate is determined on the basis of the cheapest or the most cost effective way of public transport flights are permitted only if the trip is longer than 800 km (return) or destination of geographic characteristics justifies the choice of the route. Tickets keep. If you use a personal car, refundable expenses shall be calculated on the basis of the cost of public transport or distance rates, calculated in accordance with the official rules of the Republic of Latvia or the beneficiary's use of terms.
9.3. Maintenance costs are attributed on the basis of daily allowances or real costs. If your organization has its own daily rates (subsistence money), they shall apply subject to the Republic of Latvia, the prescribed maximum limit in accordance with national law and practice. The residence includes a local cash transport (including trips by taxi), accommodation, meals, local telephone and other additional costs.
10. Equipment costs 10.1. Cost of acquisition of equipment is eligible only if it is essential for the implementation of the project.
10.2. The equipment has a project necessary technical features, and it complies with the applicable norms and standards.
10.3. The cost of purchase of equipment are applied on the basis of the fixed assets depreciation write-downs, rent or lease cost.

10.4. The choice between leasing, rental or purchase based on the cheapest option (the beneficiary must keep the documents that justify the selected option is the least expensive). If rental or lease is not possible, the short-term nature of the project or the rapid fall in the value of the equipment, the purchase is allowed and depreciation write-downs expenditure may be considered eligible, based on the regulations on depreciation write-downs.
10.5. The expenditure on rental or lease may be eligible for funding under the lease or rental period in relation to the objectives of the project.
10.6. expenditure on purchases: If the equipment is purchased before the 10.6.1. the implementation of the project or its implementation, is only applicable depreciation write-downs it spending part, which corresponds to the period of use of the equipment and the actual usage for the project's needs;
10.6.2. costs relating to equipment purchased prior to the commencement of the project, but used for project purposes, are eligible on the basis of depreciation write-downs. These costs are not eligible where the equipment was purchased through European Union funding;
10.6.3. acquisition cost of the equipment corresponds to the average market price. Depreciation is calculated in accordance with the funding to the recipient of the applicable tax and accounting rules;
10.6.4. the depreciation write-down is calculated for the full months including the month of acquisition of equipment;
10.6.5. individual items worth less than 14 056, the entire purchase amount is the eligible costs, if the equipment is purchased before the last three months of the project. Individual items that cost more, are 14 056 lats or relevant, just based on depreciation.
11. Real estate 11.1 real estate property has a project necessary technical features, and it complies with the applicable norms and standards.
11.2. The financing of real estate rental may receive, understand if there is a link between the rental and the objectives of the project and the following conditions are met: 11.2.1.  real property not purchased through European Union funding;
11.2.2. real property can only be used for the purposes of the project. Otherwise, the deal is only part of the cost is in proportion to the project used the premises.
12. Auxiliary materials and General Services 12.1. Consumables, supplies and other general costs are eligible if they are identifiable and directly necessary for the implementation of the project.
12.2. Office supplies delivery costs, as well as all kinds of detailed administrative consumables delivery costs, representation costs and the costs of General Services, which is not separated from the total cost of the authority and not directly necessary for the implementation of the project (such as office supplies, phone, internet, mail, Office cleaning, utilities, insurance, staff training and recruitment costs) is not a direct eligible costs. They include indirect eligible costs according to chapter III of this annex.
13. Subcontracting agreements 13.1. Subcontracting agreements are business contracts, service contracts, autorlīgum and other contracts with the performers, which the artist is fed directly to the beneficiaries, and makes a profit. Subcontractor means a third party who is neither a direct recipient of the funding of the project, not a project partner, and provides assistance to the specific work and service, which can not be put in direct beneficiary or a partner.
13.2. the funding recipient is capable of implementing the measures of the project, the beneficiary cannot therefore enter into subcontracting agreements for the implementation of a project. Subcontracting contracts is limited, and may not exceed 40% of the direct eligible costs. Subcontracting costs within the meaning of these rules can be, for example, the cost of translation services to print handouts, training course (cost includes, for example, the rental of premises, equipment rental), catering services, website development.
13.3. The Fund may not get such subcontracting agreements: 13.3.1. the project general management of subcontracting tasks such as project manager, Coordinator;
13.3.2. subcontracting contracts, which increases the cost of the project, but does not cause disproportionate additional value;
13.3.3. subcontracts with intermediaries or consultants, paying down a percentage of the total cost of the project, unless the beneficiary of the Fund such payments are not supported by the work performed or the actual value of the services.
13.4. In the case of all subcontracting agreements require the beneficiary and the subcontractor undertakes audit and control authorities provide all the necessary information on subcontracting activities carried out in the framework.
14. the costs resulting directly from the European Union's financing conditions 14.1. Costs necessary to comply with European Union funding requirements (such as costs related to publicity, transparency, evaluation of projects, independent audit, bank guarantees, translation costs) are the direct eligible costs.
15. Expert services 15.1 the fee for legal consultation, notary services or technical and financial experts ' fees are direct eligible costs. The cost of this expert within the meaning of the provisions is the single, specific costs with high added value in bringing in certified experts.
16. special expenditure relating to third-country nationals covered by the scope of the Fund the purchase by 16.1. beneficiary assistance made in relation to third-country nationals covered by the scope of the Fund in accordance with the definition provided in the master document, and a direct beneficiary of the reimbursement payments to these persons is an appropriate expenditure, subject to the following special conditions: 16.1.1. direct beneficiary rules down time stores all the necessary information and evidence that third country nationals who have received the aid, subject to the scope of application of the Fund in accordance with the definition provided in the Basic Act;
16.1.2. the direct recipient of the rules down time keep evidence of third-country nationals provided (for example, invoices, receipts and (or) approved payment orders).

16.2. If necessary, to persons covered by the scope of the Fund, visit measures (e.g. training measures), may provide a small cash bonuses as extra assistance provided that the total amount in one project does not exceed 17 570 dollars and bonus distribution to each person in the relevant event, course or other activities. Direct receiver stores the list of persons, which fixed the time and date of the payment, and provide appropriate measures to avoid double funding and misuse of funds.
III. Indirect eligible costs 17. Indirect costs are those costs which, in view of the compliance referred to in paragraph 1, the conditions are not considered specific costs directly linked to project activities.
18. By way of derogation from the annex and paragraph 1.1.5., paragraph 5 the implementation activity indirect costs may be appropriate for a fixed flat-rate financing, which may not exceed 7% of the direct costs. Indirect eligible costs may include communication (e.g., telephone, internet), postal costs, cleaning, utility payments, insurance, office supply costs.
19. the beneficiaries that their activity gets funding from the budget of the European Union, indirect eligible costs are not eligible.
IV. non-eligible costs ineligible costs 20:20.1. value added tax, unless the beneficiary can show that he is unable to recover it;
20.2. mediation services, which do not comply with this annex, point 1.1.4;
20.3. return on capital, debt and debt service charges, debit interest, foreign exchange commissions and losses due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, provisions to cover losses or potential future liabilities interest owed doubtful, penalties, fines, financial penalties, litigation costs and excessive or unjustified expenditure;
20.4. the representation costs relating only to the employees of the project, are eligible for measures that justify the project type (for example, the cost of the closing event of the project or project coordination group meetings). Cost of representation must be reasonable;
20.5. the costs declared by the beneficiary and which relate to another project or work programme, which receives European Union funding;
20.6. land acquisition, real estate acquisition, construction and renovation;
20.7. contributions in kind.
Culture Minister jaunzeme-grende z.