Advanced Search

Amendments To The Cabinet Of Ministers Of 30 August 2011 Rules No 670 "rules For The Implementation Of The Action Requires The Amount Of Expenditure And The Payment Arrangements"

Original Language Title: Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2011.gada 30.augusta noteikumos Nr.670 "Noteikumi par izpildu darbību veikšanai nepieciešamo izdevumu apmēru un to maksāšanas kārtību"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 123 in 2012 (21 February. No 10 23) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 30 august 2011 rules no provisions on enforcement "670 activities the level of expenditure required and the order" Issued in accordance with the code of civil procedure, art. 567 fourth and the second paragraph of article 620.10 do cabinet 30 august 2011 rules no provisions on enforcement "670 activities the level of expenditure required and the way" (Latvian journal, 2011 137. No.) the following amendments: 1. Express an indication on what basis the provisions of the law, issued by the following: "Issued under the law of civil procedure, art. 567 fourth and the second paragraph of article 620.10". 2. paragraph 1 shall be expressed by the following: "1. the provisions laid down in the Executive activities of the level of expenditure required and the arrangements for payment, as well as with the enforcement of judgments-related expenditure and the payment arrangements for the arrival of the child in matters back to the country of his residence." 3. Supplement to chapter II paragraph 6.1 as follows: "in cases of child delivery 6.1 back to a country where he has his domicile, if the execution of the ruling party, in addition to the listed in this chapter with the enforcement of judgments-related expenses amounting to: 6.1 1. costs associated with the stay of the child crisis center or other secure location, according to the pricing of the service provider; 6.1 2. travel expenses related to arrival of the child back to the country of his residence, including, if necessary, for travel back and forth with a representative of the family courts (regardless of the vehicle type), the service provider's pricing, but not exceeding the cost of the chosen vehicle for the ticket in economy class. The limit set in this subparagraph in respect of the amount not be met if this particular Executive case substantially hinder the enforcement of a ruling or could harm the interests of the child; 6.1 3. interpreter services, according to the pricing of the service provider; 6.1 4. psychologist services, according to the pricing of the service provider; 6.1 5. other expenses that a sworn bailiff or family courts, providing for the enforcement of a ruling, according to the product vendor or service provider pricing. " 4. Make point 7 by the following: "7. enforcement activities necessary expenses, as well as the amount of money to cover the expenditure related to the delivery of the child back to the country of his residence, at the request of the jury bailiff's contributions in the sworn bailiff's deposit account in the Treasury." Prime Minister v. dombrovsky Justice Minister g. Smith