Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No 136 in 2012 (21 February. No 10 42) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers as at 30 June 2008 of the Regulation No 490 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "apakšaktivitāt" Appendix 3.5.1.2.1. Regulatory requirements without the corresponding dumps "conditioning" issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 490 of the rules "rules for the" operational programme infrastructure and services "apakšaktivitāt" Appendix 3.5.1.2.1. Legislative requirements without the corresponding dumps "(Latvian conditioning journal , 2008, 110 no; 2009, no. 145; 2010, no. 135) the following amendments: 1. Replace the text of the provisions: 1.1., the words "Ministry of environment" (fold) with the words "the protection of the environment and regional development Ministry" (fold); 1.2. the Web site address "www.vidm.gov.lv" with the Web site address "URwww.varam.gov.lv". 2. Express section 9.1 the following: 9.1 "with the environmental impact assessment (if such is required) documentation associated development costs, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but no more than three percent of the cohesion fund the project planned in the application the total eligible costs. Development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz shall not exceed 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs according to the provisions of annex 3, paragraph 2 of the criteria; ". 3. Make the following paragraph 11: "11. project costs include these rules 9, 10 and 10.1 above costs." 4. Express 13.2. subparagraph by the following: "If the land is denacionalizēt 13.2 to burden with the land owner agreement on property use restrictions, secured the land for a period of not less than five years after the implementation of the project, or to the time necessary for carrying out of monitoring of pēcrekultivācij and not less than five years after the implementation of the project." 5. Make a point 15 as follows: "15. Cohesion Fund project application selection issued in three project application selection rounds: 15.1 the first cohesion fund project application selection round of available financing from the Cohesion Fund is LVL 2 408 932; 15.2. second cohesion fund project application selection round of available financing from the Cohesion Fund is LVL 3 542 688; 15.3. the third cohesion fund project application selection round of available financing from the Cohesion Fund is at least 7 823 338 lats. " 6. Supplement with 16.3. subparagraph as follows: "16.3. third application round project – up to 5 March 2012." 7. To express 17 as follows: ' 17. If the first and second cohesion fund project application selection round invited potential cohesion fund the cohesion fund the project applicant project application submitted to the responsible body within the time limit set or the responsible authority of the cohesion fund the project application is rejected, the invitation to the third resend the cohesion fund the project application selection round. " 8. Make the second sentence of paragraph 22 as follows: "one project co-financed from the Cohesion Fund must not exceed the project application selection round available for cohesion fund co-financing." 9. Replace the figures "in paragraph 21.9.23., 24." with numbers "23.1, 24.1".
10. Put the following section 35.3.: 35.3. "If the cohesion fund projects in the application of this provision in the criteria referred to in paragraph 21.9. evaluates to" Yes ", the cohesion fund the project submissions valued under the provisions of annex 12, 13, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 31, 32 and 37 of the criteria referred to in paragraph and quality criteria in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 34.2.. If the application of the cohesion fund projects in any of these provisions 3.12, 13, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 31, 32 and 37 of the criteria referred to in paragraph evaluated with "no" or cohesion fund projects, the assessment of the application does not meet the quality criteria according to this provision, paragraph 34.2.1. Cohesion Fund projects, the evaluation of the application do not continue and the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project. " 11. To supplement the rules 10 and 11 with 37.1 37.1. subparagraph by the following: 37.1 10. "to ensure tax payment under this provision of the annex 3 paragraph 23 of this criterion;
37.1 11. ensuring the right to carry out the works concerned according to the provisions of annex 3, paragraph 24 of the criterion. " 12. Express 49 as follows: "49. Beneficiary of the first and second application round project activities implemented within two years after the conclusion of the agreement for the implementation of a project. The third application round project activities implemented within three years after the conclusion of the agreement for the implementation of a project, but not later than 1 October 2015. " 13. Annex 1 Worded as follows: "annex 1 Cabinet June 30, 2008. the Regulation No. 490 of the laws of non-compliant municipal landfills no PO box Regional environmental administration (RVP) the municipality in which the landfill dump location (name) contaminated sites registry of Latgale planning region 1. Daugavpils-Daugavpils Demen 44508 RVP/830/PV 2. Rezekne RVP cibla 68988-Zvirgzden/2956/PPV 3. Rēzekne, Rezekne Ritiņ 78768 RVP/732/PPV Zemgale planning region 4. Madona RVP Koknese Koknese 32608/2832/PPV 5. Madona RVP Koknese Trying to/2816/PPV 32468 6. Madona RVP jaunjelgava, 32808 Totēn/5283/PPV 7. Madona RVP jaunjelgava young 32848/5282/PPV 8. Madona RVP in jaunjelgava Putnukaln 32788/5288/PPV 9. Madona RVP jaunjelgava callers 32868/5285/PPV 10. Madona RVP jaunjelgava 32508/2820/PPV is Siliņkaln 11. Madona Ramziņ/RVP skrīveri 32828 2,868/12 of the PPV. Madona Āžukaln/RVP meadow of 32588 5286/PPV 13. Madona RVP meadow in Rūcēnkaln/5280/PPV 32928 14. Madona Strobuk are Not rare 32748 RVP/2859/PPV 15. Madona RVP Not rare Sir, very clever 32708/2857/PPV 16. Madona Mazdīč are Not rare 32668 RVP/5278/PPV 17. Madona RVP vecumnieki, Medņ/2850/32628 VNPP 18. Madona RVP vecumnieki strainers 32628/2849/PPV 19. Madona RVP vecumnieki, Ziliņ/5290/32908 PPV 20. Madona RVP vecumnieki-5291/Taurkaln/32908 PPV 21. Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Prūsān 56548 RVP/844/PPV 22. Jēkabpils, Daugavpils RVP 56668 Stareniek/850/PPV 23. Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Escrow 56828 RVP/856/PPV 24. Jēkabpils, Daugavpils RVP Bander 56528/1440/PPV is 25. Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Sīpulān 56988 RVP/870/PPV 26. Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils Bērzgale 56748/5301/27 the PPV. Krustpils-Daugavpils RVP Polyak 56968/5358/PPV 28. Daugavpils, Jēkabpils lower RVP Sman 56948/5306/PPV 29. Daugavpils RVP Krustpils indeed 56948/5304/PPV 30. Daugavpils RVP Krustpils to Dimzukaln/5305/PPV 56948 31. Krustpils-Daugavpils Stimbināj 56768 RVP/846/PPV 32. Krustpils-Daugavpils Trošk 56468 RVP/852/PPV 33. Daugavpils RVP viesīte Spurs/5300/56357 PPV of 34. Daugavpils RVP viesīte Skos 56888/1409/35 of the PPV. Daugavpils RVP viesīte Salad is 5299/56808/PPV 36. Daugavpils RVP Island Valley 56868/5298/PPV 37. Daugavpils Plaušukaln/RVP islands of 2,133/38 56908 PPV. Daugavpils RVP Islands turnips (Gustiņ)//39 56868 5303 PPV. Daugavpils RVP aknīste Pāvulān 1 56257/838/PPV 40. Daugavpils RVP aknīste Shrieking 56448/1352/PV, 41. Daugavpils RVP aknīste urban 56448/5338/PPV 42. Daugavpils RVP aknīste Pocket 56628/5302/PPV Kurzeme region 43. Baltimore Acorn 62748 Ma/RVP 1331/PPV 44. Baltimore, MA Kauš, RVP 62468 VNPP/1012/45. Baltimore, MA Grantiņ, RVP 62608/1004/46 VNPP. Baltimore, MA Sermīt-62648 RVP/1364/47 VNPP. Baltimore, MA Svill-62648 RVP/1365/48 VNPP. Baltimore, MA Pūteļ, RVP/1328/49 62808 VNPP. Baltimore, MA Priedīškaln of the RVP 62928 VNPP/1165/50. Baltimore RVP Kuldīga blacksmiths 62608/1005/51 VNPP. Kuldīga, Liepāja RVP 62608/988/Escrow VNPP 52. Baltimore, MA Valāt, RVP/1166/62928 PPV 53. Baltimore, MA Sviķ RVP (Padur) 62728/1385/PPV 54. Baltimore, MA Fight career RVP (fight)/5378/PPV 55 62548. Baltimore, MA Bigasāt, 62508 RVP/1343/56 VNPP. Liepāja Furnish the Skrunda 62828 RVP/1251/PPV 57. Baltimore RVP Skrunda 62788 corners/1415/PPV 58. Baltimore RVP Skrunda Skrunda 62297/1445/59 VNPP. Liepaja, Skrunda Harijs Vītoliņš 62688 RVP/1275/PPV 60. Liepaja Bandzer 84708/RVP sweet in 1641/61 VNPP. Liepāja, Saldus Pampāļ 84768 RVP/1469/62 VNPP. Liepāja, Saldus Krimpj RVP (Alps)/63 84668 1468VNPP. Baltimore RVP sweet Godparent (forge) 84728/1466/64 VNPP. Baltimore RVP sweet fever graves 84828 VNPP/1431/65. Sweet Grieztpurv of Lewes RVP 84948/1433/66 VNPP. Baltimore, sweet old gravel pits of RVP 84488/5439/67 VNPP. Baltimore, in brocēni Vibster 84808 RVP/1511/PPV Vidzeme planning region 68. Valmiera RVP burtnieki 96708/2132/Kulpj in PPV 69. Lakewood Lakewood Beit-96648 RVP/2160/70 the who. Valmiera RVP beverīna Oaks/3693/94848 PPV 71. Valmiera, Celīš/RVP Valka 94928 5241/PPV 72. Smiltene to Valmiera RVP 94748/3137/PPV Kangarkaln 73. Lakewood Putnukaln in smiltene 94708 RVP/5258/PPV 74. Valmiera RVP smiltene in 94588/5318/Smiltiņsil PPV 75. Valmiera RVP smiltene Drand Street 24/3371/94155 PPV 76. The post of the Valmiera RVP Kursen/2326/PPV 77 42788. Valmiera, Veļķ/RVP vecpiebalga 42928 2508/PPV 78. Valmiera RVP vecpiebalga 42928/2505/Alaukst of PPV 79. Valmiera RVP priekuļi 42728 Piebaudz (Baudz)/5240/PV 80. Madona, Madona Vālēn 70688 RVP/3040/PPV 81. Madona, Madona RVP Shard 70968/3068/PPV 82. Madona RVP for 70628 Escrow Madona/3034/PV 83. Madona-Madona RVP pearls/3047/70768 VNPP 84. Madona-Madona RVP Linda 70428/3006/PPV 85. Madona-Madona RVP hill people/3035/86 70708 PPV. Madona-Madona Dubīt 70448 RVP/3013/PPV 87. Madona, Madona Sūņ RVP 5 284/88 70748/PPV. Madona-Madona Ienāškalniņš RVP/3056/70868 PPV 89. Madona-Madona Mālsal 70448 RVP/4401/PPV 90. Madona-Madona silenieki 70868 RVP/3057/PPV 91. Madona-Madona Jurup RVP/70868 3058/PPV 92. Madona Sidrabiņ/RVP Eagles 70928 5279/93, PPV. Madona Eagles Andrup, RVP 70608/3030/PPV 94. Madona Lempēn/RVP Eagles of 3023/95 70548 PPV. Madona RVP varakļāni varakļāni 70948/3063/PPV 96. Madona RVP varakļāni Vorz 70788/3052/PPV of Riga planning region is 97. Lielrīg RVP of Riga deglava Street 01944/675/PV 98. Lielrīg RVP Auriņ of Lielvārde 74488/3665/99 the PPV. The ogre of Lielrīg RVP Ķiļup 74808/3638/PV 100. Lielrīg RVP of OGRE Pink/3671/101 of 74528 PPV. Lakewood Grove in aloja 6448/RVP 5238/PPV 102. Lielrīg RVP of Riga on 01924 Kleist/673/a who Designation. RVP-regional environmental governance – who contaminated site contaminated site-potential PPV's-place is potentially VNPP polluted ". 14. Express 7.2 annex 2. subparagraph by the following: "7. The project budget summary, including indicative project cost plan, LVL no PO box Cost item name quantity total costs LVL 1 not applicable eligible%. The cost of the works together: 1.1.            1.2.         2. Total cost of supplies: 2.1.            2.2.            3. Costs total: 3.1.  Autoruzraudzīb costs, including 3.1.1. 3.2. project building costs, including the 3.2.1. 3.3. Project preparation costs together, including 3.3.1. 4. publicity costs together, including the financial contingency reserve up to 5% of the 1 and 2 included in eligible costs 100% "15. Supplement of Annex 8. section 2 with the following paragraph 11:" 11. "project was not punished for the Latvian Code of administrative offences 189.2 referred to in the third subparagraph of article administrative infringement." 16. Replace annex 2 section 8 of the words ' declare that the project costs in the case of growth will ensure financing from its own resources "with the words" shall certify that the costs incurred by the project or sadārdzinot on the rising costs of the project, the applicant will pay the project from its own resources ". 17. Annex 3 to express the following: "3. the Cabinet of Ministers as at 30 June 2008 of the Regulation No. 490 of the cohesion fund the project application form of valuation activity program number and name: 3. Infrastructure and services priority number and name: 3.5. Environmental infrastructure and the promotion of environmentally-friendly energy measures the number and name: 3.5.1. Environmental infrastructure activity number and name: 3.5.1.2. Regional waste management system development Apakšaktivitāt number and name: 3.5.1.2.1. The laws of non-compliant waste dumps conditioning project application selection type: limited project application selection responsible authority: protection of the environment and regional development Ministry no PO box Evaluation criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1. Project readiness stage: obtain at least 1 point 1.1. not prepared technical specifications for the procurement of the works tender and construction regulations in accordance with the procedure laid down in the field of accepted technical project the project planned the construction procurement 0 1.2. prepare technical specification technical development procurement tender for the project in accordance with the governing law of purchase 1 1.3. developed and legislation in the field of construction for the order accepted the technical design of the project planned procurement of 2 2 works. The effectiveness of the implementation of the project in relation to the requirements of the laws and not the corresponding dumps conditioning: must obtain at least 1 paragraph 2.1. development of construction and related costs of the eligible būvekspertīz amount greater than 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 0 2.2. construction development and related būvekspertīz the amount of the eligible cost up to 2.0 2.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 1 2.3. development of construction and related costs of the eligible būvekspertīz amount from 1.5 to 2.0 percent (not including) from the project submission planned total eligible costs 2 2.4. construction development and related būvekspertīz the amount of the eligible costs of less than 1.5 per cent of the project planned in the application the total eligible costs 3 3. Waste authorities, land owners (municipalities, private owners) an additional financial contribution to the project: the criterion gives additional points 3.1. up to 5 percent of the project's eligible costs 1 3.2. more than 5 percent of the eligible costs of the project 2 4. The cost of return indicators (the amount of waste landfilled (tonnes) relative to the initial project, the total cost ($)). Note the. The average project application selection round costs of return indicators calculation for project submissions that meet the eligibility criteria and the administrative cost of return-project assessment index amount in relation to the selection criteria of the project the number of turn gives extra points 4.1. project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 percent 1 4.2. project cost estimate of return is less than the project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference between 10 and 20 percent 2 4.3. project cost estimate of return is equal to the average of the calculated or up to 10 percent (not including) it exceeds, or up to 10 percent (not including) less than the project application selection round costs of return indicators 3 4.4. project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference between 10 and 20 percent 4 4.5. project cost estimate of return is greater than the average project application selection round of cost indicators of return, and the difference is more than 20 per cent 5 1.1. Criteria for the assessment of horizontal priorities points 5. Dump category according to the hazard of the waste and potentially cause the environmental pollution (sustainable development), in accordance with the laws that govern the installation of landfill landfill and dump management, closing and conditioning: criterion gives additional points 5.1. Category I-dumps, which creates a potentially low risk 1 5.2. Category II-dumps, which poses a potential risk to the average 2 5.3. Category III – dumps which constitute a potentially high risk 3 6. The project area development index project at the time of submission of the application (of the balanced development of the territory): the criterion gives additional points 6.1. area development index is greater than + 0.3 1 6.2. territorial development index is from-1.18 to + 0.3 2 6.3. territorial development index is less than-1.18 3 2. Eligibility 2.1. Project eligibility criteria Yes/No/NA 7. The project will provide dumps the negative impacts on the quality of the environment (sustainable development) N 8. The project will remove the threat of disease in the population N (NA) Yes/No 9. The project's application relates to the municipal waste dumps, which included conditioning Cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 490 of the provisions of the "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' 3.5.1.2.1. Appendix apakšaktivitāt" legislative requirements without the corresponding dumps "conditioning" annex 1 N 10. Waste dumping site registered contaminated and potentially contaminated sites registry N 11. The project submission complies with activities eligible activities N 12. The project's eligible costs included in the application corresponds to the activity of the eligible cost positions and volumes, P 13. Project costs included in the application corresponds to the activity of the eligible cost headings not P 14. Project project description in the application provides the information you need about action to be taken: N 14.1. given the technical characteristics of the activities to 14.2. expected results and outputs indicators correspond to the objective of the activity of 14.3. specify the action to be taken place in the territory of the 14.4 project implementation. actions to provide qualitative and quantitative contributions to the implementation of the European Union and the Republic of Latvia laws and regulations on environmental protection and waste management 9.0. describe the principle of the "polluter pays", the project 15. Time schedule of the project comply with the planned project activities P 16. Project information provided in the application confirms that the project applicant will ensure the sustainability of the project results: N 10.0. have the appropriate institutional structure of 16.2. the rekultivēt is planned to dump the State of the environment monitoring 16.3. is or will be available for staff to ensure the rekultivēt dump the State of the environment monitoring 17. The project specified in the project application to the actual figures (rekultivējam the dump area) corresponds to the description of the project N 18. The requested funding from the Cohesion Fund aid rate does not exceed 50% of the project total eligible costs Riga City municipality and the other 85 percent N 19 municipalities. The project budget includes cost: N 19.1. include all project costs required for the position of 19.2. is under construction for the 19.3. indicate clearly the assumptions for the calculation of the cost of 19.4. It is directly necessary for the implementation of the project of 19.5. meet the projected average market prices during the half-year before the draft submission notification of selection round 20. Project cash flow forecast: P 20.1. displays both the demand and the cost of funding forecast 20.2. meet the planned timetable 20.3. comply with the financial plan of the project 21. The project planned in the application project implementation and human resources ensure planned legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries: P 21.1. project management (including procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 21.2. project financial management (including accounting, verification and payment, financial planning) 21.3. technical management of the project (including the reconciliation of design and construction, work progress reporting) 22. The project planned publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and visual identity assurance requirements P 2.2. Project applicant eligibility criteria Yes/No/NA 23. Project applicant – municipality – no tax liability to the project application, the first working day of the month the Project applicant is 14.4 P punished for the Latvian Code of administrative offences 189.2 referred to in the third subparagraph of article administrative infringement N 24. The project shall ensure that it has the right to carry out the works concerned, where the laws are not in accordance with the waste dumping site: P 24.1. the land is registered in the land registry as municipal property (NA) 15.0. the site is denacionalizēt. With the land owner agreement on property use restrictions in place in the land for a period of not less than five years after the completion of the project, or to the time necessary for carrying out of monitoring of pēcrekultivācij (NA) 24.1 Projects the applicant has stated that the costs of the project or sadārdzinot to the increasing costs of the project, the applicant shall be borne by the project from its own resources N 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 25. Project application submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 26. The project, the applicant invited to submit a project application N 27. Project submission has been prepared according to the activity the project submission form for N 28. Project submission prepared for the Latvian language N 29. Project submission prepared into N 30. Application of the project in accordance with the laws signed by the responsible person or authorised person N 31. Filed one project application, original and two copies, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) 32. Both the project the original and the copy of the application submitted to the caurauklot, of the attached document pages are numbered (if the application is submitted in the form of a paper document) P (NA) 33. The project application and attachments are presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulatory laws (where the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 34. Project application signed with a secure electronic signature (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 35. The project application and attachments are designed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format (if the application is filed in electronic form of a document) N (NA) 36. Project application form filled in all sections, 37 N. Project application accompanied by all required attachments: 37.1 P. construction estimate 37.2. the municipal decision on providing funding to 37.3. proof that the municipality dumping site in rekultivējam has been or is being used for municipal waste management (disposal) function of 37.4. a copy of the document certifying the ownership of the land on which the dumping site in rekultivējam (NA) 37.5. with the site's owner, a copy of the agreement reached on the property use restrictions in place in the land for a period of not less than five years after the implementation of the project, or to the time necessary for carrying out of monitoring of pēcrekultivācij and not less than five years after the implementation of the project (NA) 23.4. project cash flow forecast for the legend: N-if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected. P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, specifying the project submission within the time limit laid down in that decision). NA (not applicable)-if the specified criteria are not attributable to the applicant of the project, the project is assessed for this criterion. " Prime Minister v. dombrovsky environmental protection and regional development Minister Sprūdž in the E.