The Provisions On "operational Programme Human Resources And Employment Enhancement Activity" Human Resources 1.1.1.2. Attraction To Science "second Project Application Selection Round

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Cilvēkresursi un nodarbinātība" papildinājuma 1.1.1.2.aktivitātes "Cilvēkresursu piesaiste zinātnei" otro projektu iesniegumu atlases kārtu

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.

Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 704 in 2012 (9 October. No 56 37. §) rules on "operational programme human resources and employment enhancement activity" human resources 1.1.1.2. attraction to science "second application round of projects issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme" human resources and employment ' priorities "of Appendix 1.1. Higher education and science" based "Science and UR1.1.1.pas research potential development" activity "human resources 1.1.1.2. attraction of science" (hereinafter referred to as the activity), the second application round project (hereinafter referred to as the second round); 1.2. the requirements for the project of the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) to the applicant; 1.3. the application of the project evaluation criteria; 1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. The terms used in the following terms: 2.1 foreign scientist-science employed staff with doctoral degrees who are working outside the legal relations of the Republic of Latvia, the existing scientific institutions; 2.2. doctoral applicants – in the sense of these provisions, a person who on the date of submission of the application, the project has received or expects to receive public the qualification Commission opinion on thesis and during project implementation plans to defend the thesis, including the person who studies doctoral program, a person who has acquired the accredited doctoral study programme, or a person's academic activity is equated with accredited doctoral program requirements under the regulations to the Act concerning the doctoral degree (thesis) procedures and criteria (if the person is not studied in the programme concerned); 2.3. internal transactions-research generated knowledge management, where knowledge and technology transfer: 2.3.1. Research Department or research organisations – a subsidiary of the company, in which the participation of the parent company's share exceeds 50 percent, or in which the parent company has the majority; 2.3.2. the research organisation jointly with other research organisations; 2.3.3. a research organisation with third parties, the conclusion of contracts for certain services in the open competition; 2.4. new technology, the changes in technology, methods, equipment, and software that improves production or services processes, including data processing and interpretation methods, data planning and arranging techniques, methods, political decision-makers in Government or institutional level, methods to select and classify staff, learners or other people groups, methods for checking children with reading problems or other special needs, methods to study customer , the Subscriber or other target groups, to create new services; 2.5. new scientific research group-group that is created for the implementation of the research activities within the framework of the second round (hereinafter referred to as the scientific group); 2.6. new product – full of new goods or services or goods and services that have improved functional properties or change the intended use (including changed or improved technical characteristics, components, materials, add software, user friendly features). The product is not classified as new, if it includes renewal, innovation of regular seasonal changes, product adaptation of one customer's needs and other changes that do not contain functional properties changes or improvements. A new product social and Humanities believes a new system methodology, principles or model (including methodologies to address a specific problem, to improve the statistical system with a view to optimizing the sample sets a building method); 2.7. intellectual property license agreement-a written agreement to which the research organisations fully or partially transfer intellectual property rights resulting from the research project activities, and determine the use of intellectual property, as well as agree to the terms of use, geographic operations and payment of remuneration, and the term (hereinafter licence); 2.8. the economic activities – scientific institutions operating, which does not include the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union article 107 the scope defined in; 2.9. research methodology-scientific theory-building rules, which include the following phases: problem definition, research current events test, research methods, and organizing information in a certain system, which may be obtained by applying the desired results and to provide sound scientific information; 2.10. the research organisation-structure whose main role, regardless of its legal status (public or private law entity) or the type of funding to carry out fundamental research, industrial research or experimental development and distribute it to the results of teaching, publication or technology transfer, all the profits by investing in this action repeatedly, its dissemination or training (companies that can affect that structure, for example, if they are relevant to shareholders or members must be advantages with respect to access to such structures research capacity or its generated research results); 2.11. reemigrējuš Latvian scientist-science employed employee who was working outside the legal relations of the Republic of Latvia not less than 12 months and not earlier than 18 months before the project application selection round of the tender back or during project implementation will return to the Republic of Latvia and the project establishes a working relationship to scientific institutions registered in the register of scientific institutions in the country; 2.12. the scientific personnel, according to the scientific activities of the laws governing elected and the Latvian Academy of Sciences scientific staff are included in the database of principal investigators, researchers and research assistants; 2.13. knowledge and technology transfer, intellectual property rights, a specific knowledge and technology transfer of the ražotprasm user (hereinafter the licensee) to produce new products or technologies; 2.14. know-how-practical test of the documented and a collection of information that is important for a new product or technology development; 2.15. the core scientific institutions – scientific activities and the dissemination of the scientific results of the transfer of knowledge and technology. 3. the scientific group can be composed of the following science employed workers (hereinafter referred to as the scientific staff): 3.1 young scientists; 3.2 PhD and doctoral applicants; 3.3. scientific personnel; 3.4. scientific and technical personnel in Science Service staff; 3.5. the Latvian scientists reemigrējuš; 3.6 foreign scientists. Foreign scientists involved in the project, subject to the regulations establishing procedures for the scientific authority and terminating the employment contract concluded with foreign researchers, the rules on work permits for foreigners, and the rules on foreigners must have the financial resources and financial means for the determination of validity. 4. the second round of the activity aims to promote additional human resources Association science, creating scientific groups that scientific and research work attracts young scientists, foreign scientists and reemigrējošo in Latvian scientists. 5. activities the objective of reaching the second round, the implementation of this provision, paragraph 14, and contributing to the achievement of the following indicators: outcome indicator 5.1-activities within the additional science attached to and supported 1000 scientific staff full time equivalent terms (hereinafter referred to as the full time equivalent expression). Activities under the second round of the outcome indicators project beneficiary is calculated according to the rules set out in annex 1 of the methodology; 5.2. the result indicator – a full time employed proportion of researchers who received the support of the European Social Fund is 10 percent of the total employed in science and research; 5.3. impact indicators – science and research workers, the proportion reached 0.8 percent of the decline in the population of the country. 6. the activities for the second round of the target group is the national scientific institutions and the scientific staff, including scientists, young scientists, doctoral candidates and PhD applicants. 7. The responsible authority shall ensure that the Ministry of education and science. Responsible authority: ensures project application 7.1. selection and evaluation of: 7.1.1 develop, approve and place on your website project application form filling methodology, the project application selection and evaluation procedures, as well as the submission of the project evaluation form; 7.1.2. establish and approve the submission of the project evaluation and application of project evaluation methodology for filling out the form; 7.1.3. creates a project application to the Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission); 7.1.4. develop and approve its rules of procedure; 7.1.5. assess the project submissions and decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition, as well as assess the decision on approval of the application, the project provided the conditions are met; 7.2. the accumulated data on project submissions under the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use; 7.3. provide information to the public and provide publicity on matters related to the implementation of the second round of the activity; 7.4. ensure not to exceed this provision in paragraph 10 and 11 in the activities available for the implementation of the second round of funding, and monitor the available European Social Fund funding, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the enforcement of this principle in the activity level. 8. cooperation authority provides public education development agency. The liaison body: 8.1. within 10 working days following the entry into force of the agreement on the development of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement) project, defining the requirements for the implementation of the project beneficiaries in accordance with these rules and regulations of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation, and shall submit it to the authority responsible for the coordination; 8.2. the agreement concluded with the beneficiaries, in determining the requirements for the implementation of the project beneficiaries in accordance with these rules and regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds, implementation, and monitoring of implementation; 8.3. ensure project monitoring and control, including checks at the place of implementation of the project and monitor the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project; 8.4. the Ministry of education and science provides information on State budget planning for project implementation; 8.5. the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the procurement monitoring Bureau; 5.3. prepare and submit information to the responsible body for the activities and the implementation of the second round of funding available to it, at the request of the competent authorities providing the information about a single project; 8.7. prepares the payment forecast for the activity and submit them to the paying authority; 5.5. examine and approve funding requests the payee and shall draw up a declaration of expenditure; 8.9. give information about the recipient of the funding arrangement and execution requirements; 8.10. Approves the amendments to the project; 8.11. accumulates data about the application of the project and of the project in accordance with the laws of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system design and use; 8.12. provides information to the public and provide publicity on matters related to the implementation of the second round of the activity; 8.13. If the non-compliance found, the corresponding expenditure provides recovery in accordance with the laws and regulations establishing procedures for reporting on the implementation of the structural funds of the European Union in the perceived discrepancies, accept the Board's decision on the use of funding granted and recover the irrelevant. 9. The Liaison Office has functional authority. 10. the activities implemented in the framework of the second round of projects co-financed by the European Social Fund. The total activity in the second round of funding available is 5 342 845 lats, the European Social Fund co-financing 5 207 423 lats, national public funding 109 067 lats and private funds 26 355 lats. 11. the second round of the activity to the available amount of liabilities that exceed this provision in paragraph 10 the total eligible funding is 4 463 146 lats, including European Social Fund funding 3 860 175 lats. The beneficiary shall ensure their co-financing in proportion to the intended virssaistīb for the implementation of the project funding in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 12.
12. the maximum permitted by the European Social Fund co-financing amount is 92.47 percent of the total eligible project cost totals. The implementation of national projects financed from the State budget and from 7.23% private funds 0.30% of the total eligible cost of the project. 13. activities implemented in the second round of the open in the project application selection. II. eligible and ineligible activities 14. Project has supported the following: 14.1. create a scientific group, providing additional human resources Association science; 14.2. the creation of new jobs in scientific groups involved in scientific employees; 14.3. the scientific research activity under the national priority scientific directions of fundamental and applied research funding in the 2010-2013:14.3.1. energy & environment (renewable energy resources and technology, climate change technologies and decreasing biodiversity); 14.3.2. innovative materials and technologies (informatics, information and technologies, signālapstrād, multifunctional nanostructured materials and nanotechnology); 14.3.3. the national identity (language, Latvian history, culture and cilvēkdrošīb); 14.3.4. public health (prevention, treatment, diagnostic tools and methods, biomedical technologies); 14.3.5. local resources (subsoils, wood, food and transport) – new sustainable products and technologies. 15. activities in the framework of the second round provides support only for the projects in the framework of actions for the country's scientific institutions are not economic core. III. Requirements to the applicant of the project 16. applicant Project may be a scientific authority of the State, which is registered in the register of scientific institutions – National Research Institute (derived public person, government agency), a public College, or University of the State Scientific Institute (public agency) – and the research status of the Organisation (hereinafter referred to as the scientific authority of the State). 17. the project applicant project can be implemented individually or in partnership with other national scientific bodies. 18. Cooperation within the project partnership can create one national research centre, the Centre of several national framework or with the State scientific institution, which is not a national research center of the maker. 19. where the project involves the building of partnership (at least two partners participate in the project's development, contribute to the implementation and share project risks and results), the application shall be accompanied, the managing partner, who is responsible for the project implementation, is considered a project and if the project is approved, the beneficiary of the financing. 20. If the cooperation project, the partners switch on the draft cooperation agreement and the joint exploitation of results (hereinafter referred to as the agreement), which specifies the project implementation and outcomes, including: 20.1 obligation and responsibility. the risk allocation; 20.2. the financing arrangements; 20.3. the right to the results of the project, including the rights to intellectual property (if applicable); 20.4. the results of the project, including intellectual property, new products or technologies, and prototypes of future commercialization conditions (if applicable). 21. the minimum eligible costs of the project amounts to 105 420 dollars, the maximum eligible cost total is 350 000 lats. IV. submission of the project selection and project submission notification submission 22. the responsible authority shall open the project application selection, publishing the newspaper "Latvian journal" and the Ministry of education and Science website (www.izm.gov.lv) where notice of project application submission. 23. The notice of project application submission: 23.1. activities for the second round of the available common European Social Fund co-financing; 23.2. the project submission deadline, which is not shorter than 20 working days from the day of promulgation; 23.3. the application of the project site and order; 23.4. the website which published the application to be used for the preparation of the project documents. 24. the statement on the second round of project submissions must be no earlier than one month and not later than two months after the entry into force of these regulations. 25. the project applicant project application submitted, subject to the following conditions: 25.1. each of these provisions 3.1., 3.2., 3.3., 3.5., and 3.6. the persons referred to may be employed for no more than one project; 25.2. the scientific group can invoke this provision of the 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 referred to persons who have not received the support of the activities of the first selection round (except persons PhD degree has got more than 10 years ago, or the person who set the laws of order replaced the absent persons employed in the draft no longer than three months); 25.3. the project submission count: 25.3.1. procedure where the applicant institution employing scientific staff of full time equivalent terms not exceeding 50, the applicant may submit one project submission; 25.3.2. If the applicant authority of the scientific staff of full time equivalent terms exceeds 50, the allowed number of submissions of projects Psk is calculated using the following formula, provided the Psk ≤ 7: Psk = ZD/50 + 1 Psk-number of projects which the applicant may submit a second round of activity (number of projects shall be expressed in whole numbers, the decimal digits of a discarded); ZD-project applicant institution employing scientific staff of full time equivalent terms; the common project of scientific institutions of the applicant, the number of employees full time equivalent terms (ZD) is determined according to the number of scientific personnel, which was taken into account in calculating the base funding for 2012 in accordance with the law on the financing arrangements for the base of the State scientific institutions; 25.4. the project application to the institution of the applicant, the signature of the project manager or his authorised person, project submission by adding the appropriate authorisation. 26. the project application form a completed project application form (annex 2) and the following annexes: 26.1. According to this provision the provisions of paragraph 20 of the cooperation agreement and (if applicable) for the certified copy; 26.2. the scientific group of the scientific staff: 26.2.1. proof of participation in the project (annex 3); 26.2.2. Description of dzīvesgait (CV) with attachments, including formal education (certified copies), publications and other documents (annex 4) which justify the scientific employee compliance with this provision of the annex 5 1, 2, 3, and 5. quality criteria laid down in paragraph 1; 26.3. annual report on the implementation of the budget (certified copy), prepared in accordance with the regulations on the procedure for the preparation of the annual report, for the last three reporting years concluded (responsible authority received national statistical surveys is used only for the purpose of the summary and grouping of data, economic processes and scientific analysis). A certified copy of the report shall be submitted separately, not bound to the project submission; 26.4. The State revenue service inquiries (issued not earlier than 20 working days prior to the application of the project) on tax payment and the average of the applicant and its project partners (if applicable) institution number of employees working in the last two years (over the years) or consent letter in which the project applicant or its partner (if applicable) authorise the competent authority at the request of the State revenue service certificate (annex 6); 26.5. financial analysis (if the project complies with this provision in paragraph 62 above conditions), which includes cash flow and financing the deficit and the assumptions used in the calculations (including financial projections), fact and opinion, a detailed description (including the intellectual property future value description of the method of determination) and justification (copies of supporting documents: diagrams, tables, charts, market research, competitive analysis, and other copies of the document); 16.5. other draft documents that the applicant deems necessary to substantiate compliance with the project application, this provision is referred to in annex 5, project submission evaluation criteria.
27. If the rules referred to in paragraph 26 of the document are not Latvian language (with the exception of those provisions referred to in subparagraph dzīvesgait 26.2.2. Description (CV)), shall be accompanied by a certified translation in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures which are translations of documents in the language of the country.
28. the project applicant project application can be submitted to the responsible authority: 28.1. single copy in paper form by adding identical fill the project application form and all application project (the project's financing plan and project budget summary, including indicative project cost plan (Microsoft Excel file format)) electronic version of the electronic media. If additional documents are copies of the documents, they must be designed according to the law on the development and presentation of the document specified. All the documents placed in a package (envelope) and sealed; 28.2. the electronic document in the form of laws and regulations for the design of electronic documents in the order, including the project application must be developed in DOC (Microsoft Office Word document) file format, xls (Microsoft Excel file format) or PDF (portable document format) file format. Project submission form, and in addition to the original document to be submitted must be signed by the individual applicant's institution of the project manager or his authorised person's secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp before submission of the draft selection. If additional documents are copies of the documents must be certified by each individual to the project the applicant secure electronic signature and a time stamp prior to the submission of the draft selection. 29. This provision 22, paragraph specified in the notifications to the application of the project end date is the last day when the project applicant project application may be made in person, in the form of electronic document or sent by mail. 30. the responsible authority shall register the project application submitted to it on the date of receipt. Proof of receipt of the application, project, the responsible authority shall issue to the applicant personally the project immediately after the application of the project or within 10 working days after the application deadline date by post or electronically in the form of an electronic document signed with a secure electronic signature according to the regulations on electronic document design.
V. Project submission evaluation 31. activities under the second round of project submissions submitted to the Commission. Panelists included representatives from the Ministry of education and science and the Latvian Academy of Sciences.
32. Commission meetings as observers without the right to vote can participate in the managing authority, in cooperation with the authorities, the Latvian Science Council, the National Institute Association and the Latvian Association of young scientists. 33. the Commission may invite the process of evaluating one or more experts (without voting rights). 34. In order to assess the conformity of the application of the draft provisions of annex 5, paragraph 15 of the specific criterion, the Commission consulted scientific experts, which the Latvian Science Council has granted the rights experts and which are included in the Latvian Science Council expert database. Scientific experts valued the project idea and the scientific relevance of the validity and reasonableness of research methodology. 35. the launching of the Commission, Commission members, experts and observers signed a declaration that: 21.8. during the meetings of the Commission and the information content of the document will not disclose to third parties; 35.2. they do not exist in such conditions that they can violate the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds limits the European Union fund management to the person involved, and not the circumstances that it could be argued that they are interested in a specific project in the project submitted by the applicant for the approval or rejection of the application. 36. The Commission shall determine the responsible authorities developed and approved the rules of procedure. 37. the project applicant and project submission compliance is assessed in accordance with the rules referred to in annex 5, project submission evaluation criteria in this order: 37.1. administrative criteria; 37.2. the eligibility criteria; 37.3. quality criteria and funding criteria. 38. project submissions valued under the project application to the assessment criteria (annex 5), subject to these rules and other regulations that govern the European Union's structural and cohesion funds. 39. the project submission compliance administrative criteria, eligibility criteria and funding criteria are valued with a score of "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. Vi. adoption of the decision on the application of the project approval, the approval or rejection of a conditional and its communication 40. The responsible authority shall take a decision on the application of the project if the project application meets the following criteria: 24.9. the project submission all these rules referred to in annex 5, project submission administrative, compliance and funding criteria have been assessed with "Yes"; 40.2. the project application, each of these provisions of annex 5, 5, 7 or 9. quality criteria referred to in point of assessment has received at least one point; 40.3. the project the application of these rules in annex 5, paragraph 6, of the quality criteria of assessment is received at least two points; 25.1. the application of these provisions of the draft annex 5 referred to in paragraph 1 of the quality criteria of assessment are received at least 4.2 points; 25.2. the application of these provisions of the draft annex 5 of these quality criteria are received at least standings 14.7 points. 41. the competent authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application of the project and its evaluation the continuation, if not one of the following conditions is met: 41.1. the applicant does not meet the project one of these provisions of annex 5, 27, 31, or 32. criteria referred to in points; 41.2. the project submission does not comply with any of the provisions of annex 5, 10, 11, 23, 33 or 43. criteria referred to in paragraph 1; 41.3. these provisions of annex 5, paragraph 15 referred to scientific expert opinion about the scientific quality of the research project are negative; assessment of compliance with 25.7. these provisions of annex 5, 5, 7 or 9 quality criteria listed in the project application has been received by less than one point; assessment of compliance with 25.8. these provisions of annex 5, paragraph 6 the quality criterion received less than two points; assessment of compliance with 25.8. This provision of the annex 5 1. above quality criteria received less than 4.2 points. 42. the responsible authority shall take a decision on the rejection of the application for the project, if these provisions of annex 5, paragraph 46, the funding criteria are evaluated with "no". 43. If the project application selection round several projects submissions receive the same number of points and the project submissions round of funding is not sufficient, the priority is the project eligible who this rule 5 of annex 1, 2, 3 and 9. quality criteria referred to in point standings of received higher scores. 44. Where the application does not have sufficient information to assess the project submissions conform to one or more of the criteria, and, if such information is not legible, believes that the project submission does not meet the criterion or criteria concerned given lower ratings. 45. The competent authority may take a decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition that must be satisfied in order to project the applicant would conclude the agreement on the implementation of the project. That decision may include the following conditions: 45.1. clarification of the application of the project according to the rules of annex 5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44 or 45. the evaluation criteria;  45.2. the provisions referred to in paragraph 26 of the annex to the submission; 45.3. the clarification of costs on condition that the rules referred to in paragraph 21 of the cost limits are not exceeded; 28.2. other specific legal authority to justify action, which is focused on the conclusion of the agreement. 46. If the responsible authority when deciding on the approval of the project application, conditional execution, finds that the second round of the activity is financing balance, it redirects the next submission for approval of the project, the evaluation obtained the highest scores.
47. the responsible authority shall within five working days after the date of adoption of the decision: sent to the applicant of the project-29.3. the decision on the application of the project approval, approval with conditions or disapproval; 47.2. the cooperation body, the decision on the application for the approval of the project and submission of the project approved original filed in paper form, or project submission, presented in the form of electronic documents signed with secure electronic signatures, and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design. If the application filed in paper form, within five working days after the conclusion of the cooperation agreement the authority of the responsible authorities for the project received the original of the application shall be returned to the competent authority. 48. If a decision is taken on the application for the approval of the project, the project applicant, within the time limit laid down in the decision of not less than 10 working days, and at the same time does not exceed 30 working days from the date of entry into force of the decision, shall be submitted to the responsible body for evaluation information on the fulfilment of the conditions. Decision within the time limit set in the information about the conditions of the project, the applicant may submit a maximum of two times. 49. Specifying the project submission under this provision in paragraph 48 of that decision, the project applicant must not increase the total eligible cost of the project and public aid intensity. 50. the responsible authority shall be 20 working days after this rule 48 referred to the time limit laid down in the decision to assess the information submitted by the applicant for the project and draw up an opinion on the decisions contained in the conditions (opinion).
51. The project shall ensure that the decisions referred to in paragraph 48 of the conditions within the period laid down in the decision and the opinion of the responsible authority is positive, responsible authority within five working days from the date of signing the opinion sent: 51.1. the project applicant, opinion; 51.2. cooperation authority – a decision on project approval, and submission of the approved project, which filed the original paper, or project submission, presented in the form of electronic documents signed with secure electronic signatures, and confirm with the time stamp according to the regulations on electronic document design. 52. If the applicant does not provide this provision in the decision referred to in paragraph 48 of the conditions within the time limit laid down in that decision, finding that the decision contained in the conditions are not met, the responsible authority shall send the draft to the applicant not later than five working days from the date of its signature. VII. General 53. financing conditions required for the implementation of the project the national co-financing percent from 7.53 project total eligible costs provides of the following national funds: 53.1. the State budget means percent of 7.23 project total eligible costs; 53.2. from the scientific institutions-hand means 0.30% of the project total eligible costs for which no public support (including savings). 54. The project has the following applicable items: 54.1. direct costs: research implementation costs 54.1.1; 54.1.2. public information and publicity costs not exceeding 2000 lats; 54.2. indirect costs, plan as a separate cost position and applied in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers established the indirect cost rate constant.
55. This provision. in point cost 54.1.1 position includes the following costs: 55.1. remuneration of the group involved in the scientific research personnel, as far as it is employed in the project (with the exception of remuneration or a PhD graduate student named to receive the support of the European Social Fund for studies and the scientific group of the project is involved as a volunteer investigator), including legal or civil service relations laws regulating certain costs; 55.2. national employers ' compulsory social insurance contributions; 55.3. the inventory and purchasing of instruments and delivery costs, the value of which does not exceed 150 Lats per unit or the lifetime is less than one year; 55.4. (including physical, biological, chemical and other material, the test animals, reagents, chemicals, laboratory utensils, medicines, energy, materials and electricity siltumaģent, carrier gas and other material, to the extent that they are used for research) acquisition and delivery costs; 55.5. external costs, if outsourcing procurement is carried out in accordance with the procurement regulations and regulatory costs proportion does not exceed 10 percent of the total eligible costs of the project: 55.5.1. research costs; 55.5.2. ensuring the research costs; 57.5. project research publication costs; 55.7. studies related to the book and the acquisition cost of the scientific literature, including the electronic database access license purchase costs; 55.8. mission expenses and the membership fee in scientific conferences or seminars in scientific research involved in the Group employees (excluding major or doctoral candidates, receiving the support of the European Social Fund for studies and the scientific group of the project are involved as volunteer actors) project implemented in the conduct of the study or research publicity, except for this rule 57.5. costs referred to in point. 56. This rule 55.1. the costs referred to are applicable, provided that the following conditions are met: 56.1. If involved in the implementation of the project a research employee at the same employer in conjunction with project related job tasks, the timesheet tables specifies how many hours dedicated to work that is not associated with the project, and how many hours dedicated to work in the project. If the work carried out during the project, the main job of the reduced number of hours worked number of hours to the total working time meet the labour relations regulatory laws; 56.2. If a project involved in the implementation of scientific staff also carries out other functions, for which it receives remuneration or employment contract company contract, project work is carried out at a time when according to the contract concluded with a person not the project related tasks; 56.3. employment or other contracts specified research tasks duplicated with the tasks in the project; 56.4. remuneration of the project receive adequate employment or business contract, subject to the following conditions: 56.4.1.  reward project receives the labour contract if this rule 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5. the person referred to in the implementation of the project has employed at least 20 hours a week or more; 56.4.2. the consideration of the project receive adequate employment or business contract, if the rules referred to in point 3.6 the person is from a Member State of the European Union; 56.4.3. the consideration of the project receive adequate employment contracts, if the rules referred to in point 3.6 the person is from third countries (outside the European Union); 56.5. within the framework of the project, the following salary and wage rates, not including the employer State social security payments: 56.5.1 scientific project manager (the scientist who plans and conducts research, supports the implementation of the project and responsible for the research results as a whole) – up to 10 Lats per hour; 56.5.2. the scientific personnel (involved in the implementation of the research and is responsible for specific research results)-up to 8.5 litres per hour; 56.5.3. project performers who perform specific research assignments (including science technicians and Science Service staff) – up to seven litres per hour. 57. That rule 54.2. referred to indirect costs include the costs incurred by the European Social Fund co-financed project and which are not directly related, or which cannot be directly linked with the financing of the core activities of the beneficiary, but the intended administrative operation of the project. Indirect costs are: 57.1. the project management personnel remuneration costs; 57.2. work equipment rental costs; 57.3. transport costs (fuel, vehicle rental, purchase of transport services, the use of public transport); 57.4. space rental and lease costs; 57.5. space management costs (heating, electricity, management services, water supply); 57.6. Office and office supply costs; 57.7. internet, postal and telecommunications costs; 57.8. business trip or travel costs. 58. This provision, 55.7 and 55.8 57.5. in point cost total amount does not exceed 20 percent of total eligible project costs. 59. the eligible costs recoverable value added tax payments are eligible.
60. activities in the framework of the second round are not eligible costs: indicate the 60.1. This provision, 54, 55, 57 and 59, including recoverable value added tax, technological equipment, inventory (the value of which exceeds 150 Lats per unit or that life is more than one year) and the acquisition cost of the furniture; 60.2. these provisions do not match, 54.2, 55.3 54.1.2...,., 56.5 in 55.5 and 58 in the cost limit; 60.3. haven't encountered during the implementation of project activities or made later than one month after the expiry of the implementation of the project; 60.4. not justified by supporting documents or the costs incurred by the legislative non-compliance. 61. activities under the second round of funds only the eligible costs directly related to the project activities are reasonable, justified, and comply with the Council of 13 December 2006, Regulation (EC, EURATOM) no 1995/2006 amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (Official Journal of the European Union of 30 December 2006, no. L 390) , requirements. 62. If as a result of the implementation of the project plan to obtain or derive revenue from the project for the transfer of knowledge and technologies that meet this rule's conditions, paragraph 68, and the project will meet the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the provisions of article 55 the project applicant performs financial analysis according to annex 2 of these provisions in point 6.3. methodology to determine the funding deficit, which will apply for funding from the European Social Fund. VIII. conditions for the implementation of the project. the project in the scientific group 63, subject to this provision, paragraph 3., 25.2 25.1. and 56.4. conditions of subparagraph as well as of annex 5, paragraphs 12 and 13 eligibility criteria set out in. 64. the applicant in the Project during project implementation provides the scientific group linked to scientific employees and the jobs created and retained under the project specified in the application, the number of jobs in full-time equivalent terms (FTE's accounts are not considered major and doctoral candidates, receiving the support of the European Social Fund for studies and the scientific group of the project are involved as volunteer agents (if applicable)). 65. The beneficiary shall ensure at least one conservation place of work for one group associated with the scientific research personnel full time equivalent terms for at least two years after the end of the project. 66. If the staff member ceases participation in scientific projects, his site includes other scientific employee with the appropriate scientific qualifications and competence. 67. activities in the framework of the second round, you can specify the following results achieved by ensuring compliance with quantitative indicators in this paragraph and the provisions of annex 5, 6 and 9 points minimum values specified in: 67.1. original scientific articles published in scientific periodicals in Latvian; 67.2. original scientific article that accepted or published in international scientific publications recenzēto and included in the international scientific literature databases; 67.3. monograph, which reviewed and issued by the Latvian or international scientific publishing; 41.9. paper on the research results which do not give rise to industrial property rights, international scientific conference (paper) with a report on the results of the study, given that this provision 3.1. and 3.2. persons referred to in the course of the project implementation results, which are not related to industrial property rights, public international scientific conferences at least once a year; 67.5. additional jobs full time equivalent expression during project implementation; 67.6. additional jobs full time equivalent terms, two years after the end of the project, subject to this provision, the conditions of paragraph 65; 67.7. new product, new technology, know-how or other intellectual property object. 68. The beneficiary or a partner (hereinafter referred to as licensor) shall ensure that the project generated knowledge and technology transfer activities do not possess economic in nature: 68.1. knowledge and technology transfer activities are internal activities and the income of the following re-invests in the core activity of the research organisations; 68.2. This provision 2.3.3. in the case referred to in subparagraph a license agreement with a licensee, set in open competition; 68.3. licensor of any licensee votes economic advantages receive the compensation equivalent to the market price for the intellectual property rights arising from the licensor's project activities. If it is not possible to determine the market price, the market price of the proof is intellectual property in a public auction in accordance with the legislation on tendering or negotiated procedure documented between the licensor and the licensee, the result of which the licensor has obtained the maximum price for their intellectual property rights. 69. the project applicant is entitled to initiate the implementation of the project after this date of entry into force of the provisions. 70. The beneficiary of the activities supported the implementation and execution of the purchase starting no later than the first quarter, after the conclusion of the contract or the agreement, payments and the activities supported within the eligible expenditure in the first half after the launch of the contract or the conclusion of the agreement. 71. The project will be implemented within 30 months of its launch date, but no later than 31 august 2015. 72. cooperation authority according to legislation, establishing procedures for the expected State budget co-financed by the Fund of the European Union for the implementation of the projects, as well as payment and the preparation of declarations of expenditure, funding of the beneficiary is transferred to the advance payment, not exceeding 20 per cent of the project for the European Social Fund and State budget funding, taking into account the time limits and procedures established by the provisions of the agreement. 73. Draft amendments to coordinate with the responsible authority, if the changes are related to the outcome achieved in the project.
74. The beneficiary, without making amendments to the project, you can perform the reallocation of costs, subject to the following conditions: 74.1. reallocation made, not exceeding five percent of the cost of common positions reallocated eligible costs; 74.2. redistribution can take these rules and 54.1.1 54.1.2. cost referred to under the heading, not exceeding five percent of the cost positions reallocated the total cost and subject to this provision and in 55.3 54.1.2 specified cost limit; 46.2. redistribution can take between this rule 55.1, 55.2, 55.3..,.,., 55.4 55.5 57.5. and in paragraph 55.7 cost positions, subject to this provision and in 58 56.5 points at specific cost limit.
75. The beneficiary shall provide the authority with a request for payment, accompanied by an explanation of the rules referred to in paragraph 74 of the reallocation of costs. If this explanation is not filed or the explanation is not justified, liaison body cost reallocation may be considered unreasonable, not taking it into account or considering cost reallocation took place on, notifying the beneficiary of the financing. 76. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot, the beneficiary and partners (if applicable) on the website of the authority not less than once every three months. 77. If the project occurs during non-eligible expenditure or the incidence costs shall be borne by the beneficiary of the funding from its own resources. 78. the responsible authority shall have the right to request information from beneficiaries on the implementation of the project and results achieved compliance with the planned results. Prime Minister Dombrovskis v. Minister for education and science r. wedge annex 1 Cabinet 9 October 2012 regulations no 704 "operational programme human resources and employment in the" Appendix "of human activity 1.1.1.2. linking science" project outcome indicator calculation methodology 1. "operational programme human resources and employment in the" Appendix "of human activity 1.1.1.2. linking science" (activity) of the project (hereinafter the project) outcome indicators-activities within the additional science attached to and supported scientific staff full time equivalent terms, the value of R is calculated using the following formula: R-project outcome index value that represents the entire project in the new scientific group on the basis of the contract of employment of persons employed (hereinafter the person employed) average full time equivalents (PL) amount throughout the implementation period (R accuracy-three decimal places); PLEIv-employed persons average full time equivalents throughout the implementation period; (I) variation of the person employed-(I = 1, 2, ..., n; n – the number of persons employed). 2. persons employed by (I) the average full time equivalents (PL) throughout the project implementation period is calculated using the following formula: T – (I) the person employed in a particular year of implementation of the project/number of hours worked, including current leave (if applicable); g – year of the implementation of the project (l = 1, 2, ..., g); 1920 – the number of hours of work in one year; GP-project implementation period (years). 3. (I) the person Employed full time equivalent (PLEIP) specific project period P is calculated using the following formula: TP-employed persons in a particular reporting period of the project/number of hours worked, including current leave (if applicable); P-project reporting period (in years). Transition from months to years to make the reporting period, the total number of months divided by 12; 1920 – the number of hours of work in one year;
GP-project implementation period (years). Minister of education and science r. wedge, Ministry of education and science presented in annex 2 to the Cabinet on 9 October 2012 regulations No 1 704 in accordance with Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity 2 average funding scientific activities to the scientific staff of the FA one expression is expressed in k. LVL with one mark after the decimal point. ZP: scientific laws, according to the elected and the Latvian Academy of Sciences scientific staff included in the database of principal investigators, researchers and research assistants. 3 in accordance with the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity 4 should be the same as specified in section 2.12 activity number 5 the total amount through the aisles for the following: (7) = (2) + (3) + (..) (5) the Minister of education and science r. wedge annex 3 Cabinet 9 October 2012 rules no proof of scientific staff 704 membership project I,, certify that: 1. I have read (s) with the "operational programme human resources and employment ' priorities" of Appendix 1.1. Higher education and science "based" Science and UR1.1.1.pas research potential development "activity" human resources 1.1.1.2. linking science "project application selection round of project submissions (draft) , understand (s) your tasks and responsibilities in the implementation of the project. 2. in accordance with the Treaty: 2.1.  perform the following main duties the performance of which planned working hours: 2.1.1. _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____;
2.1.2.______________________________________________________________________________________________;
2.1.3.______________________________________________________________________________________________; 2.2. the planned rate of remuneration, not including the national employers ' compulsory social insurance contributions, is late; 2.3. a projected load full time equivalent, calculated in accordance with Cabinet of Ministers on 10 October 2012 rule no. 704 "provisions for the operational programme" human resources and employment in the "Appendix" of human activity 1.1.1.2. linking science "second application round project" paragraph 2 of annex 1 are FA. 201. ___ ____. _ ___ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (name) (signature) Minister of education and science r. wedge annex 4 Cabinet 9 October 2012 regulations no 704 projects involve scientific description of the employee's dzīvesgait (CV) personal data name, surname, year of birth Nationality address email phone Education during the period of education authority educational document For qualification/degree level international classification system of additional education in the period of time the name of the course, the subject of the certificate No. Organizētājinstitūcij (last five years) experience in the period of Employment and the name, address, occupation/job title main duties achievements (last three years) scientific activities in Industrial property rights (t.sk. geographical action) scientific articles reviewed scientific monographs reports scientific conferences Topic name Conference venue/time Organizētājinstitūcij attachments (copies of) the qualification certificates of other scientific Publications operation supporting documents (name) (signature) (date) Minister of education and science r. wedge annex 5 cabinet 2012 set for October 9. tions No. 704 Project submission evaluation criteria selection round of the Action 2 programme number and name 1. human resources and employment priority number and name 1.1. higher education and science event number and name 1.1.1. Science and research potential development activity number and the name of the human resources Association 1.1.1.2. Science Project application selection type open project application selection (2nd round) the responsible authority of the Ministry of education and science i. criteria of quality assessment (point scale) (must receive at least 14.7 points total in all criteria (≈ 32.6% of the maximum available). The maximum number of points to be acquired, 45 points) 1. The scientific group and the new zinātnieku1 PhD, t.sk. doctoral candidates (which at the date of approval of the project application is received or during project implementation plans to get positive public opinion about the qualification Commission thesis) (in full time equivalent (PL)) share (F596.3) of the total scientific group involved in the scientific workforce PL expression. The number of points P1 is determined using the formula P1 = 0.14 x F596.3 provided that the P1 = 10 if F596.3 ≥ 70% 0-10, score points one Must reach at least decimal point (F596.3 4.2 = 30%)
2. the scientific group of the foreign share of zinātnieku2 (Rz) of the total scientific group involved in the scientific workforce PL expression. The number of points is determined using the formula P2 P2 = 0.3 x Rz provided that P2 = 3 if ≥ 10% Rz. 0-3, scoring one point mark after the decimal point is not exclusive Criteria 3. The scientific group of scientists involved in reemigrējušo3 Latvia: about every scientific group of the project part-time (1 PL) reemigrējuš scientists involved is assigned 1 point. If the project is reemigrējuš scientist involved in part-time, points are not awarded. The maximum number of points to be acquired – 3 points 0-3 is not exclusive Criteria 4. Applicant project average funding scientific activities for one year of scientific personālu4 (EZP) PL expression during the period from 2009-2011 (Evid = (E2009 + E2010 + E2011)/3). The number of points determined by the P4, using the following formula P4 = 0.25 x EZP provided that P4 = 5 if ≥ 20 EZP 0-5, scoring one point mark after the decimal point is not exclusive Criteria 5. Project assessment of the scientific capacity of the applicant: 0-5 must be at least 1 paragraph 5.1. Scientists involved in the project and doctoral candidates and doctoral candidates (which on the day of approval of the project application is received or during project implementation plans to get positive public opinion about the qualification thesis) in the last three years has not published an original scientific articles according to 5.2, 5.3 or 5.4 in the criteria laid down in the 0 5.2. Each scientist involved in the project, PhD and doctoral applicant (on application for the approval of the project is received, or the day of the project during implementation planning to get positive public opinion about the qualification thesis) in the last three years since the submission of the project has published at least two scientific articles (or at least one of the scientific monograph review) or received two patents of Latvia; the project group of scientists, PhDs and PhD candidates (which at the date of approval of the project application is received or during project implementation plans to get positive public opinion about the qualification thesis) overall scientific article (and monographs) scientific journals and the Latvian patent number in the last three years is not less than 1 unit of the FA 1 5.3. The project has involved scientists, doctoral candidates and doctoral candidates (which at the date of approval of the project application is received or during project implementation plans to get positive public opinion about the qualification thesis), one or more of which does not comply with paragraph 5.4.1.5.4.2 the or the qualification criteria and the rest – the qualifications set out in point 5.2 of the criterion 3 5.4. Each scientist involved in the project and doctoral student, t.sk. PhD candidate (which on the date of approval of the project application is received or during project implementation plans to get positive public opinion about the qualification thesis), meets at least one of the following qualification criteria: 5.4.1. the last three years since the submission of the project at least three scientific articles submitted and accepted for publication or published, international, scientific editions and recenzēto included in the international scientific literature databases 5.4.2. the last three years since the submission of the project has at least one scientific monograph who reviewed and issued by the international scientific publishing (the criteria used in the assessment of the Latvian Science Council data for publishers that meet international scientific publishing status) 5 6. The results of the project 0-8 results for each project is assigned a certain number of points. The maximum number of points to 8 points. Must be at least 2 paragraphs 6.1. the project planned to prepare at least two scientific articles (an average of one in each year of the implementation of the project), which will be submitted for publication in the scientific journal 1 6.2. the project planned to prepare at least one scientific monograph that will be reviewed and submitted the issue in one of the scientific publishers of Latvia 1 6.3. the project planned to attend at least two international scientific conferences with reports of studies 1 6.4. the project planned to prepare at least two scientific articles, which will be submitted for publication to the Web of science, Scopus or ERICH (A or B) databases journals included 2 6.5. the project planned to prepare at least two original scientific articles, which will be submitted for publication in the journals of the citation index reaches at least 50% of the Thomson Reuters Journal Citation report the industry average in the citation index. (The criteria used in the assessment of the Latvian Science Council data for scientific journals included in the scientific literature databases, citation index average) 6 6.6. the project planned to prepare at least two scientific monographs which will be reviewed and presented the issue of the international scientific publishing (the criteria used in the assessment of the Latvian Science Council data for publishers, which complies with the international status of the scientific publishing house) 6 7. The use of the project results 0-2 must be at least 1 paragraph 7.1. the project is not justified in the application actuality of the study or the project results will not contribute to new product (goods and services) or in the development of a new tehnoloģijas5 or the investment project application is not pamatots6 or product or technology development planned to contribute, do not meet the definition of a new produkta7 or tehnoloģijas8 0 7.2. the results of the project contributes to the development of innovative products, creating a project in the application is justified and that the product or technology development planned to contribute, or a new product meets the definition of technology 1 7.3. as a result of the project planned to develop new products, or new technology and application of the project is based on the project's conformity with the design-new product or technology definition 2 8. The project's contribution to national research centre (hereinafter referred to as the VNPC) development and strengthening of cooperation (VNPC human resources and innovative potential) 9 0 6 criteria not exclusive 8.1. the project, the applicant does not meet the 8.2 or 8.3. under this criterion; 0 8.2. the project applicant is registered in the register of scientific institutions, scientific institutions, which is forming a scientific authority of the VNPC, but there are no plans to implement the project in partnership with other scientific institutions forming VNPC 4 8.3. the project applicant is registered in the register of scientific institutions, scientific institutions, which is a component of the scientific authority of the VNPC, and planned to implement the project in partnership with other scientific institutions forming VNPC 6 quality criteria for the assessment of HORIZONTAL priorities (point scale) 9. The impact of the project on Science and research, an increase in the number of employees 0-3 should reach at least 1 paragraph 9.1. the project will create additional jobs or will be created more jobs, but the applicant has not committed to the project to provide them after the end of project implementation 0 9.2. the project, create additional jobs and the applicant undertakes the project after the end of the project to provide jobs for the linked scientific employee PL expression for at least two years 1 9.3. the project, create additional jobs and the applicant undertakes the project after the end of the project to provide jobs in the two linked to scientific staff at least two FA expression 2 years 9.4. the project, create additional jobs and the applicant undertakes the project after the end of the project to provide jobs for three or more linked to scientific staff PL expression for at least two years 3 II. eligibility criteria rating (yes/no) project application eligibility criteria 10. The aim of the project comply with the regulations in the Act on the implementation of the activity set the purpose of the activity N 11. The project planned research meets the country raised the priority of scientific virzieniem10 N 12. The project established scientific group is involved in at least six of the scientific staff of P PLUS 13. The project established scientific group is involved in no more than 25% scientists PL expression (of the total scientific group involved in the scientific workforce PL expression), doctoral degree has got more than 10 years ago and consequently should not be considered as young researchers, not including associated foreign and reemigrējušo scientists P 14. Involved in the scientific group employees (excluding criteria specified in the 13 scientists, not considered as young researchers) have received support in 1.1.1.2. activities under the first selection round P 15. Scientific expert opinion on the study of the scientific quality of the project is positive. Scientific inspection assessed: in the course of the project implementation developed scientific or other ideas remain up-to-date and reasonableness; selected research metodoloģijas11. (Opinion is negative, if there is non-compliance with the criteria, or it is not possible to assess the application of the project, as sufficient information is not provided. Assessing the project submissions by these criteria, the application will be assessed in relation to the fundamental or industrial research or other source of ideas that will be developed, in order to achieve the planned project, practical results) N 16. The project provides for the implementation of the regulatory provisions for the implementation of the specific eligible activities activities P 17. The project has been defined in the application, as well as the issue of the application of the project planned activities provide the defined problem P 18. Project activities are clearly defined, proportionate with the planned time schedule for the implementation and support of the planned results, P 19. Application of the project results and the planned figures are accurately defined and measurable (reachable results are specified in units with specific values), P 20. The expected results for the project and their indicators contribute to the outcome of this activity index-linked to the 1000 extra science according to the scientific staff in the FA staffers who received funding from the European Social Fund activity within P 21. The project is carried out in the application the project risk assessment according to the normative acts for the implementation of the activity requirements P 22. Project application describes the project management, implementation, and monitoring system and the required resources (in the number of staff involved, qualifications and responsibilities, materials, technical support), and they are appropriate to the needs of the project. P 23. The project application is justified, as it will ensure the sustainability of the results achieved and maintenance after completion of the project activities implementation of the rules on the specified time limit. N 24. The project specified in the project application costs match the expected period of the project implementation, it is necessary and reasonable to achieve project results and the implementation of planned activities. P 25.
The project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and funded projects visual identity requirements. P 26. Application of the project contains activities that contribute to the basic principle of equal opportunities (gender equality, active aging and disabled people) PROJECT P requesting compliance with the eligibility criteria rating (yes/no) 27. The project applicant is a scientific authority of the State, which is registered in the register of scientific institutions: the State Scientific Institute (derived public person or Government Agency), a public College, or University of the State Scientific Institute (public agency) N 28. The project applicant and partner (if applicable) is not a tax debt, the State social insurance compulsory contribution and other national compulsory payment of debt P 29. The project applicant and partner (if applicable) does not have a judicial decision recognised as insolvent, not in the rehabilitation process, or the process of legal protection, the economic activity is not dissolved P 30. The cooperation partner (if applicable) correspond to the legislative act on the implementation of the activity requirements partner P 31. The project applicant and partner (if applicable) is not punished for the Latvian Code of administrative offences article 189.2 referred to in the third subparagraph of administrative offences or are not appropriate for him to influence the means of compulsory criminal law article 280 referred to in the second paragraph of Commission of a criminal offence, N 32. The project activity within the sequence, the applicant has provided no more than a legislative act on the implementation of the activity of the project the number of N application III. Administrative criteria rating (yes/no) 33. The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the project submission deadline N 34. The project application is filled in Latvian language into P 35. The project application has been drawn up according to the project submission form, and it is fully filled P 36. Project submissions from the applicant institution signature project manager or his authorised person, the project by adding the application to the relevant authority or the project application is signed with a secure electronic signature according to the regulations on electronic document design P 37. The project is not specified in the application for correction, deletion, addition, deletion, and aizkrāsojum (true, if the application is filed in paper form). P 38. The project application has been submitted in a single copy in paper form by adding an identical project electronic version of the application, consisting of a project application form and its annexes (the original application is cauršūt (caurauklot)) or electronic form, a document signed with a secure electronic signature law on electronic document design established P 39. The project application is accompanied by all the regulations in the Act on the implementation of the activity referred to in the annex, and they are designed in accordance with the relevant laws and the documents in the field of developing and designing P 40. The period of project implementation and cost allocation over the years correspond to the legislative act on the implementation of specific activities for the project implementation period, P 41. The project required the application of the European Social Fund co-financing and the total eligible costs indicated in lats P 42. The project required the application of the European Social Fund co-financing shall not exceed the regulatory provisions for the implementation of the activity level of co-financing, P 43. Application of the project required total eligible cost not less than the minimum and not exceed the maximum amount of eligible costs under the regulations to the Act concerning the implementation of the activity N 44. The project required the application of the European Social Fund co-financing and eligible costs over the years specified in full in the arithmetic correctly and corresponds to the budget specified in the summary totals, P 45. The project's eligible costs specified in the application to the positions meet the regulatory act on the implementation of the activities set out the eligible costs and do not exceed the legislative act on the implementation of the activity at certain cost limits P IV. Funding criteria rating (yes/no) 46. If the application complies with the pielikuma10., 11., 15., 23., 27, 31, 32, 33 and 43 of the above evaluation criteria, as well as the evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 of the criteria is received at least 4.2 points, 5, 7 of this annex. and the assessment referred to in paragraph 9 of the criteria each received at least 1 point 6 of this annex. evaluation criteria referred to in paragraph 1 has been received in at least 2 points, and the quality criteria in the standings has received at least 14.7 points, then line up the appropriate criteria, project submissions in order of priority, starting with the most points winning the project submissions, the submission of the project has enough activity or one round of funding available N notes. 1. project submissions valued with "Yes" or "no" in accordance with the administrative and eligibility criteria. If the assessment is negative: N-project application is rejected; P -can take a decision on project approval with conditions. 2. project submissions valued by assigning a certain number of points in accordance with the quality criteria. Criteria, where appropriate, the specified minimum number of points that must be obtained for the project application will not be rejected.



1 New Scientist: the natural person conducting the scientific activity and scientific activities law PhD degree obtained in the last 10 years. 2 Foreign scientist-scientist who is working outside the legal relations of the Republic of Latvia, the existing scientific institution. 3 the Reemigrējuš and Latvian scientist is a scientist who has been working in legal relationships outside of the Republic of Latvia not less than 12 months and not earlier than 18 months before the project application selection round of the launch or return the project will return to work in the Republic of Latvia. 4 the average financing of scientific activities on the scientific staff of the FA one expression is expressed in k. LVL with one mark after the decimal point. Scientific laws, according to the elected and the Latvian Academy of Sciences scientific staff are included in the database of principal investigators, researchers and research assistants. 5 on new products and technologies in social and Humanities is considered – new or substantially improved (enhanced): (A) data processing and interpretation; (B) planning and data categorization method (Frascati 71;) (C) enhanced statistical system (product), by developing a set of sample creation methods (103;) (D) the method of political decision makers in the Government level (Central, regional or local) or industrial and commercial enterprises (109); (E) social sciences and Humanities, the principle and the methodology of the model to solve a specific problem (143); (F) the method, to select and classify the sector of industrial and military personnel, students, etc. (G) a method to check for children with reading problems or other special needs; (H) the method to study customer behaviour to create new accounts and banking services. 6 (1) is not justified for the design of the project compliance with a new product or technology definition (if applicable); (2) the product is not supplied or a description of the technology used and the comparison with a new product or technology (if applicable); (3) a reasoned justification is not provided within the framework of the planned research project investment defined new product, new technology or other intellectual property object. 7 new (innovative) product – new goods or services, as well as the goods and services which are essential to improve the functional characteristics and the expected usage (including significant change technical characteristics, components, materials, software, or other added functional properties). The product is not classified as new, if its innovation includes slight changes or improvements, restore, the regular seasonal changes, product adaptation of one customer's needs and other non-essential changes. 8 new technology – significant changes in the technological process which involves considerable technical know-how, technology, equipment, or software changes to improve production processes or production methods and the introduction of the new products. 9 national research centres are determined in the Cabinet of Ministers on 19 October 2010, provision no. 987 "rules on the action programme" entrepreneurship and innovation ". apakšaktivitāt" 2.1.1.3.1 Appendix science infrastructure development "the first application round project" in paragraph 5. 10 Cabinet's august 31, 2009. order No. 594 "On priority scientific directions of fundamental and applied research funding for 2010-2013." 11 research methodology is scientific theory-building rules, which include the following phases: problem definition, research current events test, research methods, and organizing information in a certain system, which may be obtained by applying the desired results and to provide scientifically based information. Minister of education and science r. wedge annex 6 Cabinet 9 October 2012 regulations no 704 of the applicant and its Project partners (if applicable) consent to the letter of the Minister for education and science r. wedge


Related Laws