Advanced Search

Amendments To The Cabinet On July 7, 2009. Regulations No. 752 "rules On The Action Programme" Entrepreneurship And Innovation "activity 2.1.1.1. Appendix" Support For Science And Research "the First Application Round Project"

Original Language Title: Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2009.gada 7.jūlija noteikumos Nr.752 "Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Uzņēmējdarbība un inovācijas" papildinājuma 2.1.1.1.aktivitātes "Atbalsts zinātnei un pētniecībai" pirmo projektu iesniegumu atlases kārtu"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 13 in 2013 (January 3. Nr. 1 14. §) amendments to the Cabinet on July 7, 2009. Regulations No. 752 "rules on the action programme" entrepreneurship and innovation "activity 2.1.1.1. Appendix" support for science and research "the first application round project" Issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do Cabinet on July 7, 2009. Regulations No. 752 "rules on the action programme" entrepreneurship and innovation "activity 2.1.1.1. Appendix" support for science and research "the first application round project" (Latvian journal 121. No, 2009; 2010, 29., no. 182; 2011, 137, 179 no). the following amendments: 1. Replace 44.2., 44.2.12. and 62, the number and the word "annex 1" (fold) with a number and the words "annex 2" (fold). 2. Replace the text of the provisions, the number and the word "annex 3" (fold) with a number and the words "annex 4" (fold). 3. To supplement the provisions under point 3.3.1 as follows: "3.3.1 the internal transactions-research organization the knowledge management method if the knowledge and technology transfer: 3.3.1 1. Research Department or research organisations – a subsidiary of the company, in which the participation of the parent company's share exceeds 50 percent, or in which the parent company has the majority; 3.3.1 2. research organisations jointly with other research organisations; 3.3.1 3. research organization with third parties, the conclusion of contracts for certain services an open competition; ". 4. Make paragraph 10 by the following: "total 10 activities available within the European regional development fund co-financing are 33 573 170 Lats."
5. To complement the chapter III with 19.1 points as follows: "If the economic activity 19.1 unbound as a result of the implementation of the project plan to obtain or derive revenue from the project for knowledge and technology transfer under the terms of the conditions mentioned in paragraph 85.1 and project meets the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 the provisions of article 55, the applicant made the project financial analysis according to the rules referred to in annex 1 of the methodology to determine the funding deficit, which will apply for funding from the European regional development fund. " 6. To express the following subparagraph 44.2.2.: ' ' 44.2.2. partner or partner Declaration on participation in the implementation of the project, if the project is expected to involve partners (annex 3); ' '. 7. Chapter X supplemented with 85.1 points as follows: "If according to this provision the 85.1 19.1 the terms referred to in paragraph 1 to non-economic activities as a result of the implementation of the project plan to obtain or derive revenue from the project for knowledge and technology transfer, the beneficiary or partners (hereinafter referred to as licensor) ensures that the knowledge and technology transfer activities do not possess economic in nature: 85.1 1. knowledge and technology transfer activities are internal activities and all income from these activities that they are re-investing 3.1.1. scientific institutions referred to in the main activity; 2. This provision 3.3.1 85.1 3. in the case referred to in subparagraph a license agreement with a licensee, set in open competition; 85.1 3. licensor of any licensee votes economic advantages receive the compensation equivalent to the market price for the intellectual property rights arising from the licensor's project activities. If it is not possible to determine the market price, the market price of the proof is intellectual property in a public auction in accordance with the legislation on tendering or negotiated procedure documented between the licensor and the licensee, the result of which the licensor has obtained the maximum price for their intellectual property rights. " 8. To make the new version of annex 1 (annex 1). 9. Put the new version 2 of the annex (annex 2). 10. To make the new version of annex 3 (annex 3). 11. To supplement the provisions of the annex (annex 4). Prime Minister Dombrovskis v. Minister for education and science r. wedge annex 1 Cabinet 3 January 2013 by Regulation No 13, annex 1 "Cabinet on July 7, 2009. Regulations No 752 financial analysis methodology 1. Financial analysis the financial analysis is conducted, if not associated with economic activities as a result of the implementation of the project plan to obtain or derive revenue from the project for knowledge and technology transfer and project meets the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the provisions of article 55. 2. used for financial analysis the main assumptions and parameters used for financial analysis indicates the key assumptions and parameters 3. cash flow statement

Cash flow statements for the years 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 of project revenue from the transfer of knowledge and technology patent license license 1 1 2 other intellectual property rights 1. Total revenue for additional expenses for the development of the project results in fixed assets intangible assets plant with a short lifetime of the substitution On the results of the project the cost of eligible activities for industrial property right costs for securing transportation/fuel energy costs of technical repairs operation, maintenance, administrative costs of building repairs and maintenance other operating expenses of the insurance activities (additional) costs total investment (project) costs 2. Total expenditure 3. Net book value of the net cash flow [4] = [1]-[2] + [3] 4. financial analyses financial discount rate = 5% Financial rate of return (FRR) rules the financial net present value (FNPV) 5. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) contribution calculation step 1 : Funding deficit rate (R) is calculated using the following formula: R = Max EE/DIC-DIC which: discounted investment cost; Max EE – maximum eligible costs, which is calculated using the following formula: Max EE = DIC-DNR; DNR-discounted net revenue. Diskontēto net revenue is calculated using the following formula: DNR = discounted revenues-discounted operating costs + discounted residual value step 2: decision amount (DA) is calculated using the following formula: SE = × R where: ECU ECU-project total eligible costs step 3: the maximum ERDF funding is calculated using the following formula: ERDF funding = DA that CRp: CRp-x – the maximum co-financing rate laid down in the framework of the activity (CRp = 92.5%) step 4: calculate the rate of the ERDF funding of ECU, R% R = LVL EE/DIC CRp DA, maximum ERDF funding of LVL LVL = 1 × 2 5% 1 2 3 4 = 6/1 6 = 4 × 3 92.5 "education and Science Minister r. wedge, Ministry of education and science presented in annex 2 versions of the Cabinet of Ministers 3 January 2013 by Regulation No 13 ' 2. Annex Cabinet on July 7, 2009. Regulations No 752 Minister of education and science r. wedge annex 3 Cabinet 3 January 2013 by Regulation No 13, annex 3 Cabinet on July 7, 2009. Regulations No 752 affiliate proof of participation in the project of the Minister of education and science r. wedge, Ministry of education and science presented in annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers 3 January 2013 the Regulation No. 13, annex 4 "Cabinet on July 7, 2009. Regulations No 752 Project submission evaluation criteria of the operational programme number and name: entrepreneurship and innovation priority number and name : 2.1.  Science and innovation activities number and name: 2.1.1.  Science, research and development activities number and name: 2.1.1.1. support science and Research Project application selection type open project application selection the body responsible to the Ministry of education of scientific quality criteria 1 rating (points) 1. Innovative project results be achieved at least level: 1 point 1.1. the result is not considered innovative 0 1.2. product, process, technology or other type of innovation is an important institution level 1 1.3. product, process, technology or other type of innovation is important for the Latvian level 2 1.4. product, process, technology or other type of innovation is important for the global level 3 2. The planned investment in the project is the development of the Latvian economy and its competitiveness: must be at least 1 paragraph 2.1. the project submission does not specify further the practical use of the results of the project options 0 2.2. project submission contains further practical use of the results of the project options 1 2.3. the results of the project contributes to a new product, service, process, technology or other intellectual property in the design of object 2 2.4. the results of the project in the development of new products, services, technology or other intellectual property of the object and perform elaborate industrial property objects to the consolidation of 3

3. the planned study on the project's direction or the direction of the economy and synergy: to reach at least 1 paragraph 3.1. not intended; 0 3.2. is starpdisciplinārs1 and the results of the project creates a synergy between the priority research virzieniem2 or project results creates synergies with other research virzieniem3, which contributes to the gross domestic product (GDP) of the economic development component nozaru4 1 3.3 is interdisciplinary and project results are directly usable as of GDP-forming sectors of 2 4. The project involved in the scientific research staff capacity: to reach at least 1 paragraph 4.1. insufficient scientific qualifications 0 4.2. sufficient scientific qualifications, but the current scientific work does not match the project theme applied or scientific staff has made fundamental studies 1 4.3. sufficient scientific qualifications, current scientific work corresponds to the subject of the project and applied scientific applied research has been carried out by 2 4.4. sufficient scientific qualifications, current scientific work corresponds to the project's theme, applied scientific research has been carried out by the EIB and involved scientists, working on merchant 3 5. The project planned in the application form the results of synergy effects with the project, submitted in the application for aid "of the operational programme human resources and employment enhancement activity" human resources 1.1.1.2. attraction to science ", the planned study: criteria not exclusive 5.1. No 0 5.2. Yes 1 6. Planned activities the project ready to start: should reach at least 1 paragraph 6.1. the project is ready to start (not required for the initiation of the study of scientific equipment, is not ready and reasonable research for hardware purchased) 0 6.2. the project is ready for the launch of the medium (not required for the initiation of the study of scientific apparatus is ready and reasonable research for the purchased hardware list) 1 6.3. the project has a high readiness to start (not required for the initiation of the study of scientific hardware and is prepared and justified the purchase documentation required hardware procurement or research is available to start the necessary scientific hardware and justify that hardware is not required) 2 7. The project risk assessment, including assessing the potential incidence of costs: must be at least 2 paragraphs 7.1. the project is not carried out in the application of risk assessment 0 7.2. project risk assessment in the application was made, the plan of measures to prevent the risk identified is not developed or not developed completely 1 7.3. the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, the risk identified in the plan of measures for the elimination or reduction of incompletely developed 2 7.4. the project is carried out in the application of qualitative risk assessment, develop a reasoned plan of measures identified for the elimination or reduction of risks 3 8. The project is carried out in the application the project alternatives analysis and draft economic analysis (economic costs and benefits), based on numeric calculations: should reach at least 2 points 8.1. alternative analysis has not been carried out and the project economic analysis 0 8.2. analysis of alternatives is conducted and project economic analysis 1 8.3. analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numerical calculations, and justify the proposed alternatives 2 8.4. analysis of alternatives is conducted and the project economic analysis based on numeric calculations, justify the proposed alternatives, and selected the alternative with the lowest cost 3 1.1. Quality criteria for HORIZONTAL priorities 9. Project applicant's regional allocation: 1 is not exclusive criteria 9.1. Riga planning region 9.3. Kurzeme, Zemgale, Vidzeme or Latgale planning region 3 10. Feasible study on the project contributes to sustainable development in the implementation of the horizontal priorities: the criteria are not exclusive 10.1. the project does not affect this area 0 10.2. the project has an immediate positive impact – the results of the project can use environment-friendly new products, services and technologies for the creation, nature and rational use of energy or the negative impact on the quality of the environment for the elimination or reduction of 1 10.3. the project has a direct positive impact – the results of the project are focused on environment-friendly new products, services and technologies, natural and rational use of energy or the negative impact on the quality of the environment, prevention or reduction 2

2. eligibility criteria rating (yes/no) 2.1 application the PROJECT eligibility criteria 11. The project is consistent with the objective of the activity to support the practical orientations of research projects that promote the integration of science and production and implementation of the results of research under the country raised the priority of scientific virzieniem5 N 12. Research subject compliance with at least one of the priority research directions: N 12.1. agrobiotehnoloģij 7.6. Informatics 12.3. Biomedicine and pharmacy 12.4. energy 7.8. the science of 12.6. forest science 12.7. medical science 12.8. 13. environmental science The project intended to implement one or more of the following eligible activities: N 13.1.  the practical implementation of the guidelines for research that includes the following research categories: industrial research, experimental development, industrial research or experimental development technical feasibility studies 13.2.  research results publicly accessible 13.3.  the strengthening of industrial property rights 14. The project application is defined in the problem addressed and justified the chosen target group needs P 15. Application of the project and the planned activities provide the problem and define the target group's needs P 16. Project activities are clearly defined, proportionate with the planned time schedule for the implementation and support of the planned results, P 17. Application of the project results and planned performance is clearly defined and measurable. P 18. Project application describes the project management, implementation, and monitoring system and the required resources (in the number of staff involved, qualifications and responsibilities, the available material and technical base) and they are appropriate to the needs of the project, P 19. The project application is justified, as it will ensure the sustainability of the results achieved and maintenance after completion of the project, P 20. Project costs indicated in the application to match the expected project implementation period is necessary and justified in the project results and the implementation of planned activities P 21. The project planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities are relevant for European Union funds projects in the implementation of the publicity requirements, P 22. If the project involves collaborative partners, their choices are reasonable (the competence of partners meet the project's planned activities, provide justification why the involvement of partners is not required) (if applicable). P applicant eligibility criteria PROJECT 23. Scientific institutions (research institutes, universities, University research institutes) that have been registered in the register of scientific institutions. N 3. Administrative criteria rating (yes/no) 24. Project applicant meets the legislative act on the implementation of the activity requirements project applicant N 25. The project application is filed within the time limit set 26 N. The project application is drawn up into N 27. Project submission is prepared in Latvian language N 28. The project application has been drawn up according to the project application form and have filled in the N 29. Project submission is filed in paper form (the required number of copies of the application for the project), the original and the copy of the application is cauršūt (caurauklot), or electronic form, a document signed with a secure electronic signature law on electronic document design established P 30. The project application is signed by the project head of the institution to the applicant or his authorised person P 31. The project application is accompanied by all the regulations in the Act on the implementation of the activity required in annex P 32. The period of project implementation and cost allocation over the years correspond to the legislative act on the implementation of specific activities for the project implementation period, P 33. The project required the European regional development fund co-financing and total eligible cost specified in full in the P 34. The project required the European regional development fund co-financing shall not exceed the allowable amount P 35. The minimum eligible costs of the project amount is not less than 70 280 lats and the maximum amount of eligible costs not exceeding N pounds 36 491 962. The eligible costs of the project over the years specified in full in the arithmetic correctly and in accordance with the project budget totals listed in the summary P 37. The project's eligible costs specified in the application to the positions meet the regulatory act on the implementation of the activity of the eligible costs laid down.   P 38. The planned project costs do not exceed the legislative act on the implementation of the activity at certain cost limits P 4. Funding criteria rating (yes/no) 39. If the application meets the 11, 12, 13, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 35 listed in the evaluation criteria, as well as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. the assessment of the criteria referred to in point each has received at least one point, point 7 and 8 in the evaluation criteria in each has received at least two points in the standings and quality criteria is received at least 10 points, then the project submissions, listing in order of priority starting with the most points winning the project submissions, the submission of the project has enough activities in available funding round N

Project submissions valued with "Yes" () and "no" (not match) in accordance with the administrative criteria, eligibility criteria and funding criteria. Criteria that are assessed by "Yes" or "no" is two rating: N-negative rating in case the application is rejected, the project P-can decide on approval of the draft provided that a project shall ensure compliance with the criteria laid down in the decision deadline. Project submissions are judged with a certain number of points in accordance with the quality criteria. Criteria, where appropriate, the specified minimum number of points that must be achieved to project submissions would not be rejected. The notes. 1. An interdisciplinary research is the study, the implementation of which requires two or more sectors of information, data, methodologies, tools and approach to integration, to create knowledge and solve problems that are impossible to carry out one field. 2. Agrobiotehnoloģij; Informatics; Biomedicine and pharmacy; energy; materials; forest science; medical science, environmental science. 3. According to Latvian sciences industry classification 4. agriculture, industry, construction, trade, transport and communications, public services, other services 5. on 6 June 2006 the Cabinet of Ministers order No. 412 "On priority scientific directions of fundamental and applied research funding 2006-2009". Confirming the Government of other priority scientific directions, respectively, will be specified in the direction of science in support of the EU funds. " Minister of education and science r. wedge