Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 305, Riga, 4 June 2013 (pr. No 33 16) amendments to the Cabinet June 30 2009 rules no 675 "rules for the operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' addition of the activity" support 3.4.3.3. cultural monuments for preservation of cultural monuments private and their socio-economic potential of "effective use" Issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No. 675 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix." support activity 3.4.3.3 cultural monuments for preservation of cultural monuments private and their socio-economic potential of effective use "" (Latvian journal, 2009, no. 132, 100, 149; 2010. No; 2011, 109 no) the following amendments: 1. Make paragraph 3 by the following: "3. the implementation of the activity is detected in the project application selection. Open the project application selection responsible authority organises rounds following a notice of project application submission. If the project application deadlines are not learned all the available funds in the round or additional funding is granted, the competent body shall organise further selection round on the funding available. " 2. To supplement the provisions of point 4.1, the following wording: "in the framework of the activity 4.1 the available amount of liabilities that exceed this provision referred to in paragraph 4, the European Regional Development Fund (hereinafter referred to virssaistīb funding) is 4 000 000 lats. European regional development fund, the beneficiary (beneficiaries) co-financing in proportion to the intended virssaistīb for the implementation of the project funding in accordance with the provisions of point 5.2. " 3. Make paragraph 5 by the following: "5. the first round of the activity within the framework of the European Regional Development Fund funding per project is up to 1 999 999 dollars, and not less than 250 000 lats. The European regional development fund intensity shall not exceed 50% of the total eligible costs. " 4. Supplement with 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 points as follows: "5.1 activities the second round within the framework of the European Regional Development Fund funding per project is up to 250 000 dollars and not less than 100 000 lats. The European regional development fund intensity shall not exceed 50% of the total eligible costs. 5.2 the activities for the third round of the virssaistīb within the funding granted to the applicant for the project-Association, Foundation or religious organization that meets this provision in paragraph 10. A third round of funding available within the virssaistīb is 4 000 000 lats. The third round of the activity within the framework of one project financing available virssaistīb is not more than 4 000 000 lats and not less than 1 000 000 lats. Virssaistīb funding intensity does not exceed 85% of the total eligible costs. 5.3 in the fourth round of the activity within the framework of the European regional development fund and the remaining virssaistīb funding for legal or commercial register registered natural person who complies with the provisions of paragraph 10 of the above requirements, with the exception of the Association, Foundation or religious organizations. Within the framework of the fourth round of financing is available at least 594 812 lats. The fourth round of the activity within the framework of one project financing is available for up to 100 000 lats and not less than 25 000 LVL. The European regional development fund and the financing of virssaistīb intensity shall not exceed 50% of the total eligible costs. " 5. Supplement with 7.5.1 section as follows: "develop cost effectiveness 7.5.1 assessment methodology;". 6. Express 8.3. subparagraph by the following: "8.3. the contract with the beneficiary of the financing for the implementation of the project;". 7. Express and 8.8. paragraph 8.7. by the following: "8.7. implementation of projects analysed problems and make proposals to the authority responsible for the implementation of the project; 5.5. check payment submitted by the beneficiaries of funding requests, approve the amount of the eligible expenditure, prepare payment orders, as well as prepare a proof of the statement of expenditure approval; ". 8. Express 11.2 and 11.3 of the following point.: "11.2. that other European Union structural funds or the Cohesion Fund during the implementation of projects is not deliberately misled the liaison body or authority, giving false information in connection with the implementation of projects; 11.3. it is not in the interest of a person committed a crime that hit the Republic of Latvia or the European Union's financial interests, and it is not suitable under the criminal code in influence forced; ". 9. Supplement with 11.6. subparagraph by the following: "it is not punished for 11.6. The Latvian Code of administrative offences 189.2 referred to in the third subparagraph of article administrative violations or criminal law article 280 referred to in the second paragraph of Commission of a criminal offence or has no suitable forced influence (if the applicant is a private-law legal person) the Commission of a criminal offence." 10. Make the following point 12: ' 12. activities within the framework of one of the selection round of the project the applicant can submit only one project submission. " 11. paragraph 16.1.5. To express the following: "16.1.5. the eligible cost of the project value added tax costs if the project applicant cannot recover it according to the regulations of the tax policy;". 12. Express 16.2. subparagraph by the following: "16.2. indirect eligible costs: 16.2.1. contingencies for the implementation of the project, up to a maximum of five percent of the total direct eligible project costs (expenditure, if necessary, can be used with the implementation of the project related directly attributable costs); 16.2.2. the activities for the third-and fourth-round selection of the project framework of activities directly related to the cost of publicity, which is optional and carried out in accordance with the laws of European Union funds publicity and visual identity requirements. " 13. Express 17 the following: "17. Activities in the first and second rounds of the selection are not eligible costs relating to information and publicity measures for the implementation of a project." 14. To supplement the rules by 19.1 points as follows: "application of Project tendering 19.1 third and fourth round opened no later than July 4, 2013." 15. Express and section 21.2.3 21.2.4. by the following: "applicant consent project 21.2.3. the letter (the original of the letter is submitted separately, not attached to the application in the project), in which the project applicant authorizes the competent authority at the request of the State revenue service certificate of the applicant's tax project (annex 2); 21.2.4. a credit certificate for the provision of credit, which indicates that the information referred to in annex 4.1 (if applicable), or the credit institution's statement of account balance, which shows that the information referred to in annex 4.2 (if applicable) on the applicant (hereinafter referred to as the certificate). Inquiries submitted for an amount that is not less than the first year of implementation of the planned project costs. If the project applicant project is anticipated to receive 47 of these regulations specified in advance in the amount specified in the certificate shall not be less than the difference between the first year of the project total planned costs and advance payments. The project at the date of application to the credit certificate may not be older than 30 calendar days; ". 16. Amend section 21.2.5. the word "full". 17. To supplement the provisions of the following paragraph 21.2.5.1: "būvvald-approved simplified 21.2.5.1 renovation or reconstruction plans simplified copy (if applicable);". 18. The deletion of 21.2.16. and 21.2.17.. 19. Supplement with 21.2.19. section as follows: "21.2.19." If the public funds exceeds eur 5 million equivalent in dollars, the cost effectiveness of the relevant responsible authorities develop methodology for cost effectiveness. " 20. Supplement with 21.1 points in the following wording: "The activity 21.1 the third and fourth round does not apply this provision, 21.2.7, 21.2.8 21.2.6..., and section 21.2.9.21.2.10.." 21. Delete paragraph 24 of the numbers and the word "3 and 4". 22. Make 33.1, 33.2 and 33.3.. subparagraph by the following: "the Commission first 33.1. assessed the compliance of the application of the draft provisions of annex 5, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 37 of those criteria. If the application does not meet any of these criteria, the evaluation of the application of the project according to the rest of the project submission evaluation criteria do not continue; 33.2. If the application complies with the provisions of annex 5, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 37 criteria listed in project submissions valued under the provisions of annex 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 26 and 27 the criteria referred to in the paragraph. If the project the application does not meet any of these criteria, the evaluation of the application of the project according to the rest of the project submission evaluation criteria do not continue; 33.3. If the application complies with the provisions of annex 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 26 and 27 of these criteria, the project submissions valued under the provisions listed in annex 5 of the quality criteria. If the project application to the assessment of compliance with the quality criteria receive less than 21 points, project submission evaluation according to the rest of the project submission evaluation criteria do not continue; ". 23. Replace paragraph 20.8, the number and the word "points" with the number 37 and the word "21 points". 24. Make the following subparagraphs 20.8.: "If the project application 20.8. comply with the rules referred to in annex 5, funding criteria, project submissions valued under the provisions of annex 5, 9, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 25, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38 and 39 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1." 25. replace paragraph 34, the number and the word "points" with the number 37 and the word "21 points". 26. Express 35 as follows: ' 35. If multiple project submissions receive the same number of points, with priority given to projects with a higher application of these provisions, annex 1 and 5 (5) quality criteria referred to in the rating totals. If these criteria are also assessed the total, with priority given to the application of the project with a lower requested the European regional development fund. " 27. To supplement the provisions of the following paragraph 35.1: "If multiple project submissions 21.8 receive the same number of points in the third round of the activity, with priority given to projects with a higher application of these provisions, annex 1 and 5 (5) quality criteria referred to in the rating totals. If the criteria of assessment of the total, with priority given to the application of the draft with more overall funding required in virssaistīb. " 28. Make 36.2 and 36.3. subparagraph such.: "to ensure the project submission 36.2. compliance with these provisions of annex 5, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38 and 39 of the above administrative criteria; 22.6. to ensure compliance with the application of the draft provisions of annex 5, 9, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23 and 25 in paragraph eligibility criteria; ". 29. Make 37.1, 37.2 and 37.3... subparagraph by the following: "5. this rule 37.1. attachment 28., 29, 30, 31 and 37 administrative criteria referred to; 23.1. these provisions of annex 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 26 and 27, paragraph eligibility criteria; 37.3. This provision 5.40 and 41 of the annex referred to in paragraph funding criteria. " 30. Express 45 as follows: "45. First and second round of project submissions within the framework of these activities the beneficiaries will be implemented within four years, the third-and fourth-round selection – 22 months after conclusion of the contract with the liaison body for the implementation of a project, but not later than 30 June 2015." 31. Supplement with 46.1 and 46.2 point as follows: "If the activity within a 46.1 project has been discrepancy or any termination of the agreement on the implementation of the project, the non-compliance found or end the civil agreements exempt funds not in the amount of the expenditure incurred may not be directed to implement new projects and additional financing activities to be implemented in the project. 46.2 cooperation 4.1 authority referred to in paragraph virssaistīb of the funding only if the project eligible activities (including purchases) will be started or continue not later than the first quarter of project implementation of the contract or the conclusion of the amendment to the terms of the contract and expenditure under the project will be carried out in the first half after the agreement for the implementation of a project or appropriate amendment of the conditions of the contract. " 32. the supplement to annex 1 section 1.1.5.1 as follows: "1.1.5.1 the responsible person (s): (name) telephone: fax: email:" 33. Supplement to annex 1, point 2.13.1 as follows: "the nature of the cost effectiveness of 2.13.1 (if applicable) (maximum 2000 characters):" 34. Express 3.1 of annex 1 of subparagraph by the following: "3.1 project schedule project activities no __ name of project implementation and time schedule (quarters) 20xx 20xx 20xx III IV I II III IV I II 1.                 2. ' 35. Express 7.1 of annex 1 of subparagraph by the following: "7.1. funding sources for the project total eligible costs of the project, requested funding intensity LVL% 1 2 total cost (A) = B + C% ERDF co-financing Private B 100 financing (including savings) (C) ' 36. Express of annex 1, point 7.3 and 7.4 as follows:" 7.3. the cost of return index calculation (population planning in the region, which, in implementing the project, to ensure access to culture and public interest activities in relation to the investments serve (ls)): "7.4. project financing plan year total eligible costs total eligible costs eligible costs private ERDF eligible costs 1 = 2 + 3 = 4 2 2/1 4% 5 = 4/1 20xx 20xx 20xx total" 37. To complement the provisions in the annex 1 to this paragraph 8.15:8.15. "other European Union structural funds or cohesion fund projects during the implementation of the project the applicant has deliberately misled the liaison body or authority by providing false information in connection with the implementation of the said project. " 38. Delete annexes 3 and 4. 39. To complement the provisions of the annex, with 4.1 and 4.2 as follows: "annex 4.1 Cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No 675 credit inquiries about granting (legal name of the person to whom the credit institution covers) (date) of the credit granting (legal name) certify that is granted by the (name of institution), (legal name) the registration number of the commercial register, loans () (currency amount) (currency and amount in words) about the implementation of the project.     (project name)    
The decision on the granting of loans shall be in force until 20 ___ ___ of ______. __________________________________.
         (credit paraksttiesīg-person posts)    (name and signature)
    (contact the credit institution that could provide additional information on the project: name, title, telephone number, e-mail address) "4.2 annex Cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No 675 credit statement of account balance (the name of a legal person to which the credit institution covers) (date) certify that (name of institution), registration (legal name) number of the commercial register ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ have opened a checking account no _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____, which balance at 20 ____ of _____. ____ ____ ____ ____ _____ is () (currency , amount) (currency and amount in words) (credit paraksttiesīg-person title) (name and signature) ' 40. Annex 5 shall be expressed as follows: "annex 5 cabinet 30 June 2009 Regulations No 675 Project submission evaluation criteria project quality criteria quality criteria ranking system score 1. The construction project of the readiness project: the date of the application Criteria should receive at least 1 point 1.1. project application in building project approved būvvald attached to the technical design stage or būvvald by approved simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) and the construction cost estimate, has opened a procurement for project investments in infrastructure 5 1.2. project application in building project approved būvvald attached to the technical design stage or būvvald by approved simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) and construction cost estimates have been developed for the procurement documentation project infrastructure investments provided for in 3 1.3. project application in building project approved būvvald attached to the technical design stage or būvvald by approved simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) and the construction cost estimate, is not prepared for the purchase documentation project infrastructure investments provided for in 1 1.4. 1.1. are not fulfilled, or 1.2 1.3. requirements set out in 0 apakškritērij 2. The risk of the implementation of the project (construction, purchase and sales risks, potential cost incidence, compliance with the time schedule of project implementation) Evaluation Criteria to receive: at least 4 points 2.1. the project is evaluated in the application potential risks (construction, purchase and sales risks, potential cost incidence, joining the project time schedule), developed action plans for all identified risks for the elimination or reduction of 6 2.2. application of the project risks identified in part (construction, purchase and sales risks, potential cost incidence, joining the project time schedule), developed a complete action plan identified for the elimination or reduction of risk 4 2.3. the project submission does not evaluate the possible risk to 0 3. The project application and operation plan for publicity and information measures which will enhance the visibility of cultural monument: the criteria to receive at least 2 points 3.1. international level 6 3.2. national level 4 3.3. regional level 2 3.4. the project application and operation plan in cultural monument of publicity and information activities 0 4. The project is saved and restored the national protected cultural monument, which is: to receive at least Criteria 2 points 4.1. National wooden architecture monument of culture 4 4.2. national cultural monument 2 4.3. are not fulfilled or 4.2 4.1 the requirements apakškritērij 0 5. The results of the project and saved the restored object has public-interest building, in which the Criteria to receive: at least 3 points 5.1. in accordance with the law on cultural monuments conservation and protection functions can be established to hold cultural and national measures 6 5.2. in accordance with the objects set out in the action plan features may hold cultural and national measures 3 5.3. the object is not intended to hold cultural and national criteria for horizontal measures 0 priority ranking system point scale 6. Applicant project eligible costs financing part of the project is more than a Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity required minimum co-financing part: not exclusive criteria 6.1. for 10 or more percent 4 6.2. from 7.50 to 9.99 percent 6.3 3. 5 to 2 percent on 6.4 7.49. up to 4.99 per cent 1 6.5. applicant project eligible costs financing part of the project is more about Cabinet activities implementation of the rules on the minimum co-financing 0 7. The cost of return indicators (population planning in the region, which as a result of the implementation of the project have access to cultural and national measures against's investments (in LCY)): not exclusive criteria 7.1. from 3.51 3 7.2. from 3.5 up to 2 7.3 1.51 up to 1.5 (including) 1 8. The project application of specific actions provided for in the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities: Criteria must receive at least 2 points 8.1. four or more specific actions for equal opportunities (3) 8.2. from one to three specific activities to ensure equal opportunities 2 8.3. not intended for specific steps to ensure equal opportunities 0 eligibility criteria eligibility criteria for project evaluation system yes/no/not applicable or will be rejected ٭ 9. The European regional development fund co-financing does not exceed the maximum amount of co-financing, P 10. The aim of the project activity meets the objective of a cultural monument preservation, public access and use of socio-economic, located in private property and provide important public functions N 11. Application of the project planned activities and expected results and indicators are clearly defined, reasonable and measurable, focused on project objectives and indicators of achievement of the target group's needs N 12. The project is expected to be implemented until 30 June 2015 N 13. Object in which the investments are located in the property of the applicant for the project N 14. The project is accompanied by a valid application object action plan with a term of at least five years from the date of completion of the project N 15. The project described in the application of project management, monitoring and quality assurance system P 16. Project costs included in the submissions comply with the Cabinet of Ministers regulations on the implementation of the activity cost and cost of the project is planned in a proportionate and reasonable in relation to anticipated results, corresponds to the actual cost of the project in the sector at the time of the application, P 17. The beneficiary will provide the necessary resources for the implementation of the project N 18. The project planned publicity and visual identity measures comply with the laws and regulations on the procedures for ensuring the European Union's structural and cohesion funds publicity and visual identity requirements, as well as public information on this Fund projects P 19. The project applicant is committed to providing financing from its own resources if the project costs will grow N 20. The project planned activities are not financed or co-financed by the and not from State and local government funds and other Union financial sources, and does not overlap the activities financed from the funds of the European Union and the activities of other financial instruments within N 21. Application of the project results in the work of the remains of the heritage value of the object (authenticity) N 22. The project is set in the application, as it will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the project for at least five years after completion of the project, P 23. The project has made an assessment of the effectiveness of the cost, the cost per unit of the benefit exceeds the provisions for the implementation of the activity on the BOM of the relevant project activities the maximum cost level (if applicable) P/NA Project applicant eligibility criteria ranking system yes/no or will be rejected ٭ 24. The project applicant is legal or natural person registered in the commercial register, the property of which is a cultural monument N 25. The project applicant is not in the State revenue service administered by the tax debt P 26. The project applicant is not handed down a judgment in the proceedings or a court judgment is not the legal protection process, or by a court decision is not implemented in the out-of-court redress process, has no previous bankruptcy, or the restoration of a suitable composition or its economic activity is not terminated N 27. The project was not punished for the Latvian Code of administrative offences 189.2 referred to in the third subparagraph of article administrative violations or criminal law article 280 referred to in the second paragraph of Commission of a criminal offence or has no suitable forced influence (if the applicant is a private-law legal person) the Commission of a criminal offence, N administrative criteria ranking system yes/no/not applicable or will be rejected ٭ 28. The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 29. The project application is drawn up into N 30. Project submission is prepared in Latvian language N 31. Project applicant project application is filed in one of the following ways: N 19.3. by mail or in person in a sealed container (envelope or box) 31.2. electronic document signed with a secure electronic signature and add a time stamp to 32. The original application is the project caurauklot (cauršūt), and the project application pages are numbered (if applicable) P/NA 33. Project application submitted in two copies, one of which is the original, the other copy of the electronic medium, and they are the instructions (if applicable) P/NA 34. A copy of the application to a project in electronic media in line with the original project submission (if applicable) P/NA 35. The project application has been drawn up according to the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers on the implementation of the activity requirements P 36. The project is fully completed application, including the application of the project includes all the provisions for the implementation of the activity of the BOM set additional documents to P 37. The project application is signed by the person under the paraksttiesīg regulations N 38. Application of the project financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed P 39. Application of the project financial statement is made in the funding criteria P evaluation system yes/no or will be rejected 40. ٭ The project submission complies with 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 37. evaluation criteria, as well as the evaluation criteria 1 has received at least one point valuation criteria 2 – at least four points, 3. evaluation criteria – at least two points, 4. evaluation criteria – at least two points, 5. evaluation criteria in at least three points, 8. evaluation criteria – at least two points and a total of at least 14 points, after assessing the quality evaluation criteria N 41. Rank 40. evaluation criteria with "Yes" the estimated project applications in order of priority, starting with the most points earned, submission of the project has enough funding available in N activity together If the application of the project 38 won fewer than 21 points, it is rejected. N-If the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected. P-if the evaluation is negative, can make a decision about the approval of a project application with the condition. " Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis, Minister of culture žaneta jaunzeme-grende