Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No 595 Riga 2014 (30 September. No 51 33) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 26 January 2010 regulations No 91 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix 3.6.1.1 activity" national and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development "Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds control law paragraph 10 of article 18 to make a Cabinet of 26 January 2010 the Regulation No 91 ' rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix 3.6.1.1 activity" national and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development "(Latvian journal , 2010, 25, nr. 119.; 2012, 77, no. 159; 2013, 250. No.) the following amendments: 1. Replace paragraph 4.1, the number "42 594 440" with the number "44 424 918". 2. To supplement the provisions under section 16.1.1 the following: "supporting project documentation 16.1.1 the cost of preparing the project application selection within 10 rounds (except for project submission form fill): 16.1.1 the construction sketch 1 stage of the project and the technical design stage, simplified renovation or reconstruction plans simplified documentation, development, and deployment of equipment development project public and public building projects; 16.1.1 2. audit, inspection, investigation, civil design professional supervision costs, if it is a prerequisite for the construction, renovation or simplified simplified reconstruction conception for the development of the documentation; 16.1.1 3. cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis; 16.1.1 4. legislation on environmental impact assessment for the preparation of the document; " 3. Express the point 20 as follows: "the maximum available in 20 European regional development fund co-financing and referred to in point 4.1 shall virssaistīb in the distribution of funding are the following: 20.1. Daugavpils City municipality – 42 011 915 € 20.2. Liepājas City municipality – 44 110 673 eur; 20.3. the city of Jelgava municipality-29 252 174 eur; 20.4. the municipality of Rezekne-29 612 346 eur; 20.5. the Ventspils City municipality – 27 523 786 euro; 20.6. Jēkabpils City municipality, 19 022 132 eur; 20.7. Valmiera City municipality – euro 18 961 557; 12.9. the Cēsis district municipality – 14 454 122 eur; 20.9. Kuldīga district municipality – 9 133 998 euro; 20.10. the sweet-9 768 118 Government eur; 20.11. Līvāni district municipality – 14 422 897 euro; 20.12. Talsi district municipality – 9 047 066 euro; 20.13. Aizkraukle district municipality – 9 133 732 eur; 20.14. Gulbene district municipality – 8 310 168 euros; 20.15. Madona district municipality – 6 608 674 eur; 20.16. Smiltene district municipality-6 086 846 euro. " 4. Make the following paragraph 27:27. Project applicant project application form, including the project submission form attachments, prepared and presented in accordance with this provision, 1. the requirements set out in the annex, but the project application selection round – 10. According to this provision the requirements laid down in annex 1.1. "
5. To complement the chapter III with 28.3 points as follows: "the project application selection 17.6 10. sequence within the project submission form to add the project application, the municipal development programme and its amendments (if applicable) copy of the electronic medium and accompanying such originals, copies or notarized copies, which is proof of the appropriate authorities of compliance with the original copy: 28.3 1. cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis; 2. If the tenderer 28.3 contracted for development projects or planned to conclude such an agreement, his supply of finance municipal infrastructure building design work (when the design work is project) or a construction project or the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction plans simplified documentation development (including the disposition of equipment development project public and public building projects) cost (if applicable) together with the that includes at least the following: 28.3 the optional service or 2.1 product name; 2.2. the number of units of 17.6; 17.6 2.3. unit price without value added tax and with it; 28.3 2.4 total amount, less value added tax, and with it; 28.3 3. legislation on environmental impact assessment of certain documents (if applicable); 28.3 4. local authorities a copy of the regulations, the application shall be accompanied, where the local authorities; 17.6 5. project management personnel involved in the dzīvesgait descriptions (curriculum vitae); 28.3 6. documents proving ownership of the infrastructure object or objects which, in accordance with the project of the construction technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction of the simplified scheme documentation is scheduled to invest: 28.3 6.1. real estate objects – local ownership by supporting documents – extract from the land register or, failing that, a certificate for being the property of the municipality and State land cadastre service certificate; 28.3 6.2. other infrastructure assets – for being in the property, the purchase contract or other evidence of title (if applicable); 17.6 7. If the project is for this provision 16.1.11. the investments referred to in the statement that works for the project in the projects developed by the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction plans, simplified will be met up to 2022. " 6. Add to the introductory part of paragraph 30, behind the numbers and the word "28." with the words and figures "(in relation to the project application selection round 10 – this rule 28.3)". 7. Add to paragraph 35, 36, first and second sentence, and paragraph 37 behind the numbers and the word "in" annex 2 with the words and figures "(in relation to the project application selection 10. round-this provision in annex 2.1)". 8. Put the following to paragraph 38:38. "the head of the responsible authority shall take a decision on the application for approval of a project, if a project application 38.1.: meet all these rules in annex 2 (for the project application selection 10. round-this provision in annex 2.1) established administrative, compliance and supports the award criteria; 38.2. the project is executed in the application of this provision in annex 2 (for the project application selection 10. round-this provision in annex 2.1) the quality criteria laid down minimum requirements; 38.3. the project the application of these provisions in annex 2 criteria for the assessment of quality has received at least 17 points (for the project application selection 10. round this provision in annex 2.1 quality criteria of assessment are received at least 8 points). " 9. Add to paragraph 39, 40.2. and 41. number and point after the words "annex 2" with the words and figures "(project application selection round – 10 this provision in annex 2.1)". 10. Add to 45.1 45.2 45.3., and section number and the word "Gorge in annex 2" with the words and figures "(in relation to the project application selection 10. round-this provision in annex 2.1)". 11. in paragraph 59 of the expression as follows: "59. the project application selection 1-9. the sequence within the project no longer than till 2015 15 July, but the project application selection 10. round – no longer than until 2015. December 30." 12. To supplement the provisions of this annex with the 1.1 version: 1.1 "annex to Cabinet of Ministers of 26 January 2010 Regulation No. 91 of the European regional development fund, the project submission form project title: operational programme 2007-2013 title: infrastructure and services priority number and name: Polycentric development Measures 3.6 number and name: 3.6.1. measure" Support for sustainable urban development "role and activity number and name: 3.6.1.1. activity" national and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development "Apakšaktivitāt number and name project applicant: completed the responsible authority/institution cooperation: project identification no: ___/___/_____/____/___ ___/___/_____ ____ ____/____ ____ date of Project: project selection type: limited open 1.  -Basic information about the project title applicant 1.1.   Project applicant: name: 1.1.1 1.1.2. Registration number: 1.1.3. Taxpayer registration number: 1.1.4. Legal address: Street, House No.  City State zip code
 

 1.1.5. Contacts: phone: fax: email: person responsible full name position contact: first name, last name, title of the project applicant 1.1.6. type: code name 1-16 local authorities 1-28 municipality requesting the project 1.1.7. a classification according to the European Union of the statistical classification of economic activities (NACE Rev. 2).: code name 2.  Section – project description 2.1.   Summary of the European regional development fund within the framework of the project activities to be carried out (the freedom of information law, and the volume will be available after the entry into force of the decision on the European regional development fund project application) (max. 1000 characters): 2.2. Project location: project site address: local government: planning (mark): Kurzeme planning region of Latgale planning region of Zemgale planning region of Vidzeme planning region of Riga planning region 2.3. project classification according to the European Union of the statistical classification of economic activities (NACE Rev. 2). : code name 2.4. The aim of the project (max 500 characters): 2.5 the justification of the need for the project and linking to the municipal development program (max. 3000 characters): 2.6 target group needs the project description and the expected impact of the project on the target group needs (max. 1500 characters): 2.7. planned activities of the project (up to a maximum of 2500 characters): No.  Action name Action description of the European regional development fund within the framework of the planned activities 1.     2.     3.     Holders of the European Social Fund within the framework of the planned activities (if applicable) 4.     5.2.8. the results Achieved under the project (up to a maximum of 2500 characters): no and name the project name the result result of the numerical number of unit activities must coincide with the project submission form section 3.4 2.7 and following. 2.9. additionality of the project with other projects approved or planned projects (up to a maximum of 2500 characters): project title and number of the instrument and name of the program at the time of the implementation of the project (project or project), which complements the project submissions received or expected funding (euro), by the beneficiary of the financial sources of foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities which the actions were planned or the relevant national or regional development centres in the territory of 1.             2. State and local budget resources – which the beneficiary or applicant has the relevant national or regional authorities or the European Centre for the development of its established authority 1.             2. Project milestones 2.10. surveillance (outcome and outcome) indicators: Outcome indicators: no  Name of the indicator number of unit 1.        2.        3.      
Results indicators: no  Name of the indicator number of unit 1.        2.       3.      
2.11. the degree of readiness of the project for the implementation of the project (max. 1500 characters): 2.12. Project (the project or parts of it) does not overlap with the activities (or part thereof) intended for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities that the applicant project eligible for funding (max. 1500 characters): section 3-implementation of the project (to be completed if a project evaluation criteria) 3.1.  Project implementation, management and monitoring capacity (max. 2500 characters): 3.2 total planned duration of the project (in months) 3.3 project results, including the maintenance of the infrastructure, for at least five years after completion of the project: (max 2500 characters): 3.4. Implementation schedule: project no __ and name the project time schedule (quarters) 20 __. g. 20 __. g. 20 __. g. 20 __. g. 20 __. g. 20 __. g. 20 __. g.    I. II. Iii. (IV) (I). II. Iii. (IV) (I). II. Iii. (IV) (I). II. Iii. (IV) (I). II. Iii. (IV) (I). II. Iii. (IV) (I). II. Iii. 1. 2. 3. should coincide with the 2.7 and 2.8. operations specified in section names and numbers.  
 Title 4 – publicity 4.1 project information and publicity measures (note): the plate spaces press releases informing the mass media for large format Billboard on the information plate information website on the internet other (Please specify) 4.2. Describe the measures that will be implemented in order to comply with the laws and requirements of the European Union with regard to the project's publicity and information activities (max 2000 characters): title 5 – under the horizontal priorities 5.1 the project impact on horizontal priority "macroeconomic stability" : mark the appropriate co-financing by the applicant: the project eligible cost of the project is part of a larger (more than 10 percent) than the required minimum proportion of co-financing the project co-financing from the applicant's share of the eligible cost of the project is larger (from six to 9.99 per cent) than the required minimum proportion of co-financing the project co-financing from the applicant's share of the eligible cost of the project is larger (up to 5.99 percent) than the required minimum proportion of co-financing the project co-financing from the applicant's share of the eligible cost of the project is more than a certain minimum proportion of co-financing of the project 5.2 impact on horizontal priority "equal opportunities" : mark the appropriate: the project four and more specific activities to ensure equal opportunities project for one to three specific activities to ensure equal opportunities project does not foresee specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities to describe how it will comply with the rules, which provides for the implementation of specific activities of the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities (maximum 1000 characters): Title 6-project environmental effects 6.1. conformity of the activities envisaged in the draft of the law "on environmental impact assessment" evaluation of action set out the requirements for the : do not need environmental impact assessment requires an initial environmental impact assessment requires an environmental impact assessment in 6.2. If the 6.1 shows that evaluation is not required to give reasons for the specified compliance with references to laws and regulations governing environmental impact assessment: 6.3. If the 6.1 shows that the original environmental assessment or environmental impact assessment, describe how the project will ensure compliance with the activities envisaged by the law "on environmental impact assessment" evaluation of action laid down requirements: 7-project cost and source of funds 7.1.   The project financing plan: State budget allocations to local authorities in the amount calculated in accordance with the laws and regulations concerning the criteria and procedures of the national budgets to local authorities and grant planning regions in the European Union's structural and cohesion funds for the implementation of projects co-financed. ** For example, officials of the Foundation or the European investment bank funding. 7.2. The project budget summary: 7.3 cost benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis key findings (maximum 1500 characters):
 

7.4 describe how project activities provide for the reduction of maintenance expenditure on infrastructure after the project or business activities require the establishment or enhancement of infrastructure (max. 1000 characters): 7.5. Describe the financial situation of the municipality, the estimated tax revenue, expenditure, as well as the ability to provide pre-financing and co-financing of the project (max. 1500 characters): 8.-proof Section 8.1. requesting proof Project: I, the undersigned applicant project applicant project title officer     , first name, last name, job title, certify that the project submission time: dd/mm/yyyy 1. project applicant has the appropriate legal status; 2. the applicant is appropriate for the project activity; 3. the project applicant has sufficient and stable financial resources; 4. the applicant is not in the project's financial stabilisation process; 5. the project has the necessary human resources; 6. the project application and its annexes include information true and requested for the implementation of the project of the European regional development fund and European Social Fund (if applicable) the co-financing mode will be used in accordance with the submission of the project description; 7. There is no known reason why this project could not be implemented or could be delayed its implementation, and confirm that the obligations set out in the project may make laws for the Foundation of the European Union within the implementation of the activity; 8. this project is not being funded and has been co-financed from other/European Union financial sources as well as State and local budget resources; 9. in the case of direct approval of the project in the project application will not be submitted for co-financing of funding/other financial sources of the European Union, as well as State and local budget resources. Aware that the project may not approve for co-financing from the European regional development fund and the European Social Fund (if applicable) if the project application, including this section, is not fully completed, and of high quality as well as the relevant legislation of the European Union funds the implementation of the planned activities of the European regional development fund co-financing (the current year/planning period) at the time of approval of the project has been used up. Aware that the project may not approve the application for co-financing from the European regional development fund and the European Social Fund (if applicable) if the project application overlap with the planned costs costs for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the above entity-project – the applicant may be eligible for funding for the project planned in the application but not made use of the possibility of following to get funding from these sources. Certify that the works for the project in the projects developed by the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction plans simplified (if applicable), will run until 2022. Declare that, in relation to the contract, which defines the public service obligation, the provisions will be complied with the requirements referred to in paragraph 28.1, but if these provisions will apply to the contract of 28.2 of the type referred to in paragraph 1, the payment of remuneration to the public service average in the year will not exceed 15 million euro for the general economic interest of the public services which are not the transport or the transport infrastructure, but the period in which a provider of a public service entrusted to provide the service will not exceed 10 years. Certify that the false information given on the proof of the necessary administrative and financial penalties may be started against both me, and also to the above legal persons – the project applicant. I certify that the attached copy of the application the project meet in my possession of the original document and the project application, the municipal development programme and its amendments (if applicable), the cost-benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis, a copy of the electronic medium corresponds to the value in the original document. In the case where the application will be supported by the European regional development fund and European Social Fund (if applicable) co-financing the project co-financing and guarantee a _____. Confirm that if the increase in the cost of the project, all of the European regional development fund project, additional costs will be covered from the funds of the applicant for the project. I certify that the applicant has not sanctioned the project of the Latvian Code of administrative offences 189.2 referred to in the third subparagraph of article administrative infringement.
 Signature: date: dd/mm/yyyy accompanying document list: 1. ... ". 13. To supplement the provisions of this annex, with 2.1: "2.1 Annex Cabinet of 26 January 2010 Regulation No. 91 of the operational program number and name: 3. ' infrastructure and services ' priority number and name: 3.6." Polycentric development "Measures the number and name: 3.6.1. "Support for sustainable development of the role of urban and" activity number and name: 3.6.1.1. The "national and regional development center, promotion of balanced national development" project selection way limited project application selection responsible authority for environmental protection and regional development Ministry
 

1. The criteria of quality evaluation system-points scale 1.1. project quality criteria 1. The project is intended for investment: not exclusive criteria a. Development Center (City) infrastructure (traffic, social, cultural, recreational and other) with a development centre (City), as well as with the use of the infrastructure related services; 6 b. Development Center (City) infrastructure (traffic, social, cultural, recreational and other) with a development centre (City); 4 c. Development Center (City) in regional planning; 2. (a) are not complied with. (d), (b) and (c). apakškritērij in.. justification the evaluation of 0:2. the project provides an integrated approach to urban infrastructure development, making connections with municipal development program: criteria should be received at least 4 points (a). the project involves an integrated approach to urban infrastructure development, including interactions and effects provided outside the municipal territory, providing the association with the municipal development programme, analysing the current situation, assess the various types of funding (public and private) attachment mechanisms and provide complex solutions to the problem; 6 (b). the project has analysed the current situation and provide associations with the municipal development programme, but not assessed various financing (public and private) Association mechanisms, providing partial problems complex solution; 4. (a) are not complied with. (c) and (b). the requirements set out in apakškritērij. justification the assessment 0: rationale: the reasons for the rating you assigned the evaluation: 5. the project application contains and how reasonable the project complements other approved or planned projects that are funded or planned to be financed from other funds of the European Union activities or other financial instruments: the criteria to receive at least 2 points (a) and the project application indicates that this supplement is based on more than one project or project submission; 3 b. application project contains reasonable and that it complements the one project or project submission; 2 (c). the project submission does not indicate that it adds one or more projects or project submissions. justification the evaluation of 0:6. the project in the application reflect the degree of readiness of the project implementation Criteria are not mutually exclusive: a. project activities are approved for construction in the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) and is advertised on the purchase project investments in infrastructure; 6 (b). the project activities are approved for construction in the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable) and to prepare documentation for the procurement project investments in infrastructure; 4 c. project activities are approved for construction in the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction scheme of simplified (if applicable); 2. (a) are not complied with. (d), (b) and (c). apakškritērij in.. justification the assessment 0:1.2. criteria on HORIZONTAL priorities 8. Applicant project eligible costs of co-financing of a project is more than a law on the implementation of the activity required minimum specified co-financing: the criteria are not mutually exclusive (a). more than 10 percent; 3 b. from six to 10 percent; 2 c. up to 5.99 percent; 1 d. the applicant project eligible cost share of co-financing the project not more than laws and regulations for the implementation of the activity the minimum share of co-financing. justification the assessment 0:9. The project is designed for the specific actions the principle of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities: Criteria must receive at least 2 points (a). the project provides for four and more specific actions for the provision of equal opportunities; 3 b. projects for from one to three specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities; 2 c. project does not foresee specific actions for equal opportunities. justification the assessment 0:                
 

Eligibility criteria for ranking system – yes/no eligibility criteria of the project Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 12. The project is consistent with the purpose of the activity – provide specific national and regional development centre (the city of) growth, providing support for the implementation of the project and the role of the urban competitiveness, affordability or availability and attractiveness factor for development in accordance with the local development programmes N 13. The project planned activities comply with the law on local self-government of the autonomous action of the set functions N 14. Project activities are justified, proportionate with the expected timetable and ensure objective P 15. The project activity conforms to the rules set out the eligible activities P 16. The project application is justified, as it will ensure the implementation and monitoring of the project P 17. Application of the project included in the eligible and non-eligible costs set out in the rules meet the eligible and non-eligible costs P 18. The project's estimated cost of application corresponds to the project planned activities P 20. Application of the project results, planned their value and impact of the results are clearly defined, measurable and contribute to the achievement of the objective of the activity of P 21. The project budget includes costs are reasonable and justified, they match the expected period of the project implementation and operation and is calculated by taking into account the expected market price of a given project year, P 22. Application of the project financial statement is accurately and correctly arithmetic developed P 23. The project of the European regional development fund co-financing shall not exceed the percentage specified in the provisions of P 24. The project's total eligible cost is less than the rules specified amount to the applicant of the project P 25. Project application of the European regional development fund eligible costs do not exceed the terms of the project the applicant stated maximum amounts available P 26. The project of the European Social Fund, the combination does not exceed 10 percent of the project total eligible costs (if applicable) P 27. The project planned activities comply with the laws and regulations on the business support requirements P 29. Application of the project planned activities (project or part of it) does not overlap with the activities (or part thereof) intended for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the project, the applicant may be eligible for funding in N 30. The project idea is the coherent application of the protection of the environment and Ministry of regional development coordination Council set up N 33. The project is set in the application, as it will ensure the maintenance of the results achieved in the project for at least five years after completion of the project, P 34. The project is designed and approved for the municipal development programme N 36. The project has made a cost-benefit analysis, where a project is designed for the income and the project meets the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 55, but if the project is not intended for revenue, has been cost effectiveness analysis or cost-benefit analysis N 37. If the project has been cost-benefit analysis, economic profitability of the project is larger than the social discount rate (5.5 percent) and project economic net present value greater than zero, P 38. If the project has been cost effectiveness analysis, project cost per unit of the benefit does not exceed the terms of the project activities the maximum cost level P project, the applicant has not punished 39.1 of the Latvian Code of administrative offences 189.2 referred to in the third subparagraph of article administrative infringement N 24.4 project implementation duration does not exceed the terms of the Cabinet of Ministers laid down P 39.3 Project applicant certifies that the infrastructure for the project in the projects developed by the technical design stage or simplified renovation or reconstruction plans simplified (if applicable) will be built until the year 2022 P PROJECT applicant eligibility criteria scoring system – yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 41. The project applicant is stable and available financial resources, P 42. The applicant is not in the project's financial stabilization process N administrative criteria scoring system – yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 43. Project submission is prepared in paper form and submitted personally or sent by mail in a sealed container (envelope or box) or in the electronic form of a document drawn up, filed electronically, signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp N 44. The project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the time limit set in the invitation N 45. The project applicant is invited to submit a project application 46 N. The project application has been submitted in one original N 47. The submitted application is the project cauršūt (caurauklot), where the application is submitted in paper form P 48. All project submissions page is numbered P 49. Project submission is prepared according to the rules of the project application selection 10. round the specified project submission form, and all of the forms are filled in section P 50. Project submission prepared into P 51. Project application form is attached to all of the provisions laid down pursuant to the accompanying documents and presented P 52. The project is not specified in the application for correction, deletion, addition, deletion, or aizkrāsojum, where the application is submitted in paper form P aid criteria ranking system – yes/no Noraidāms1 or precizējams2 53. Application of the project planned activities (project or part of it) does not overlap with the activities (or part thereof) intended for foreign financial assistance in the framework of the activities of the P 1 if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected.
2 If the rating is negative, can make a decision on project approval with conditions (project shall ensure compliance with the criteria laid down in the decision). " The Prime Minister is the Rapidity of the Newsletters of the protection of the environment and regional development Minister novel Naudiņš