Advanced Search

Amendments To The Cabinet Of Ministers On 24 July 2012 Rules No 518 "the Economic Properties Of The Plant Variety Evaluation Rules"

Original Language Title: Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2012. gada 24. jūlija noteikumos Nr. 518 "Augu šķirnes saimniecisko īpašību novērtēšanas noteikumi"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 559 in 2016 (16 august. No 40 32) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rules no 518 "the economic properties of the plant variety evaluation rules" Issued under the seeds and the varieties of life law 11.1 of the first paragraph of article 3 of the Cabinet to make the 2012 July 24 Regulation No 518 "the economic properties of the plant variety evaluation rules" (Latvian journal, 2012, 2013, 120. no; 246. No; 174. nr. 2014,) the following amendments : 1. Replace the text, the word "criteria" (fold) with the word "indicators" (fold). 2. Express 3 and paragraph 4 by the following: "3. the evaluation of the variety is growing, the use of the variety and the quality of the product obtained in comparison with standartšķirn. Species can be certain of the rating groups that each of them may have one or more standartšķirn. List of Standartšķirņ according to the requirements of the evaluation group at the national plant variety Board proposal creates and updates the Latvian University of Agriculture. 4. Standartšķirn check of the requirements are the following: 4.1 variety is entered in the catalogue of varieties of plants (hereinafter referred to as the directory), or if the directory does not contain a suitable variety, choose it from the European Union's common catalogue of agricultural crops; 4.2. the variety used in the production of agricultural products; 4.3. the variety of the seed is ensured. " 3. Make paragraph 5 by the following: "5. If the catalog does not include any of the varieties of the species concerned, the variety being evaluated is compared with the species variety, which is better." 4. Make point 7 by the following: "7. If standartšķirn is not specified for the species, varieties assessed physical indicators according to the rules referred to in annex 1." 5. Express section 8.1.2. following: "8.1.2. cereals and oilseeds they form varieties – three years;". 6. Supplement with 13.1 points by the following: "13.1 If the applicant wishes to include a variety, the applicant shall submit the application in the service catalogue of the variety in accordance with the laws of the Latvian plant catalogue of rules." 7. Make the following paragraph 21: ' 21. species seed quality for basic seed category quality requirements laid down in the law on solely and seed. Seed supply in accordance with the law on plant quarantine requirements. " 8. Supplement with 21.1 points as follows: "the Latvian Agricultural University 21.1 of the seed, the applicant receives a seed of Swede rape and turnip rape that pickled with Latvia or another Member State of the European Union of plant protection product seed treatment (hereinafter referred to as the stains), and pickled seeds of the species in General. The operator of its field trials with etched stains, registered in Latvia and aligned with the Latvian University of agriculture. " 9. Express 22 the following: "22. a variety shall be evaluated according to these provisions 4.1 annex to the corresponding assessment of the species groups. For each designated group is an appropriate standartšķirn (one or more). The applicant filed the application indicates which species according to group the variety is verifiable. " 10. To complement the chapter III with 22.1 points as follows: "If the evaluation of the variety concerned 22.1 the group uses several standartšķirn, the variety is compared with all the groups concerned, a median of standartšķirņ." 11. section 24.1.2. To express the following: "particular field trials 24.1.2. location may be different, but the seeded varieties only dīgstoš the number of seeds, fertilizer, priekšaug, stains and soil treatment, and care of plantations of volumes and harvesting technology is applied to the uniform. Rape and the particular field rep trial site may differ not only variety, but also stains; ". 12. Replace the words in paragraph 25.1. "crop" with the word "species". 13. Replace the words "in paragraph 26.1. crop" with the word "plant". 14. Replace the words "in paragraph 16.3. estimate the crop" with the words "for the species being assessed". 15. Replace the words "in paragraph 29.3. pagriezienjosl" with the words "turn-around". 16. Replace paragraph 30, the words "for each crop" with the words "every species". 17. paragraph 32 be expressed as follows: "32. phenological assessments are marked such growth (plant development) phase: 32.1. cereals: 32.1.1. all species, except for this provision, and 32.1.4 32.1.2.32.1.3.. the species referred to in point – full of seedlings phase, vārpošan or skarošan in the beginning, full of flowering phase (rye) and full of ripening phase; 32.1.2. buckwheat seedlings – full phase, the phase of the inflorescence emergence beginning and full of ripening phase; 32.1.3. oats Green fodder production – flowering mid; 32.1.4. corn (green fodder production) – full of seedlings to flowering phase, phase and piengatavīb; 32.2. fodder plants: 32.2.1. sowing peas, field beans, vetches, lupins, white blue Lupin, yellow lupin seed for the generation of the complete phase, flower seedlings start phase and harvesting ready; 32.2.2. grasses – full-phase and vārpošan seedlings/skarošan opening; 32.2.3. legumes (green fodder production), oil rutk, California Bluebell, full of seedlings phase and the beginning of flowering; 32.3. oil and fibre plants: plants 32.3.1. rape, Rep, flax oil, hemp oil, full of seedlings to flowering phase start phase and harvesting ready; 32.3.2. fibre flax – full of seedlings to flowering phase starting phase and early dzeltengatavīb; 32.3.3. fibre hemp – full of seedlings to flowering phase starting phase and full flowering phase; 32.3.4. white mustard (green fodder) – full of seedlings to flowering phase and phase; 32.4. potatoes-full of seedlings to flowering phase, the beginning and the end of the vegetation period (early varieties only). " 18. Replace the words "in paragraph 41.3. high quality" with the word "quality". 19. paragraph 47 of the following expressions: "47. The Latvian Agricultural University shall notify the applicant: 1. this rule 29.3. in the annex the full results of the evaluation of varieties of the species concerned (except maize and potatoes) – up to 15 of the current year, but not later than October to 25 October, if this result is delayed in preparing for the harvest according to weather conditions or other reasonable circumstances; 47.2. This provision in annex 1 the full results of the evaluation of varieties of maize and potatoes, up to 1 year, but not later than November to 10 November, if this result is delayed in preparing for the harvest according to weather conditions or other circumstances justify it. " 20. paragraph 49 be expressed as follows: "49. Latvian University of Agriculture, in agreement with the staff of the deliverable document shall be submitted to the technical service for inclusion in the design of plant varieties for the evaluation of economic characteristics of database: 30.5. This provision species listed in annex 1 (except maize and potatoes) are all varieties of the results of the evaluation of each pilot site, up to the current year's October 15, but no later than October 25, if the results are delayed in the preparation for the harvest according to the weather or other reasonable circumstances; 30.6. This provision in annex 1 all varieties of evaluation results for each trial site for maize and potatoes – up to 1 year, but not later than November to 10 November, if this result is delayed in preparing for the harvest according to weather conditions or other circumstances justify it. " 21. the supplement VII to 30.5 point as follows: "service all breed 30.5 evaluation results published in tīmekļvietn to its current year 20 November." 22. To supplement the provisions and paragraph 56.57 as follows: "winter crops of cereals and 56. oil (winter crops forms), which apply to the catalogue of the 2016 1. September, breed evaluation duration is two years if conditions for wintering has been under ziemcietīb. If the national plant variety Board until June 1 of the current year, the evaluation of the two-year assessment of the ziemcietīb variety, admits that the wintering conditions were not appropriate for the ziemcietīb evaluation, the evaluation of the variety at the national plant variety Board proposal continues a third year. 57. Rule 43, 44, 45, paragraph 46 and terminates with the 16 June 2018. " 23. Make 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the annex by the following: "1. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 assessment scores of varieties and conventional organic 1. economic characteristics of cereal varieties evaluation indicators 1.1. Common wheat and durum wheat varieties in the field trial evaluation indicators: 1.1.1. ziemcietīb (winter wheat), ballroom; 1.1.2. the plant length, cm; 1.1.3. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 1.1.4. grain yield at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 1.1.5. the grain yield,% (compared to the standard); 1.1.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; 1.1.7.1000 grain mass, g; Quality indicators: 1.1.8. storage volume, g l-1; 1.1.9. protein content,%; 1.1.10. gluten content,%; 1.1.11. sedimentation (Zeleny index), cm3; 1.1.12. falling number, s; 1.1.13. starch content,%; 1.1.14. color, unit (hard wheat); 1.1.15 envisages. stiklainīb,% (hard wheat). 1.2. evaluation of varieties of rye field trials indicators: 1.2.1 ziemcietīb, ballroom; 1.2.2. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 1.2.3. the grain yield at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 1.2.4. the grain yield,% (compared to the standard); 1.2.5. the plant length, cm; 1.2.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; 1.2.7.1000 grain mass, g; Quality indicators: 1.2.8. storage volume, g l-1; 1.2.9. the protein content,%; 1.2.10. the falling number, s; 1.2.11. starch content,%. 1.3. evaluation of varieties of Triticale field trials indicators: 1.3.1. ziemcietīb (winter triticale), ballroom; 1.3.2. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 1.3.3. grain yield at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 1.3.4. the grain yield,% (compared to the standard); 1.3.5. the plant length, cm; 1.3.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; 1.3.7.1000 grain mass, g; Quality indicators: 1.3.8. storage volume, g l-1; 1.3.9. the protein content,%; 1.3.10. the falling number, s; 1.3.11. the starch content,%. 1.4. evaluation of varieties of barley field trials indicators: 1.4.1. ziemcietīb (winter barley), ballroom; 1.4.2. resistance to veldr, ballroom **; 1.4.3. grain yield at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 1.4.4 grain yield,% (compared to the standard); 1.4.5. the plant length, cm; 1.4.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; 1.4.7.1000 grain mass, g; 1.4.8. kuļamīb,% (kailgraud); Quality indicators: 1.4.9. protein content,% (grain group N% x 5.7); 1.4.10. storage volume, g l-1; 1.4.11. the starch content,%; 1.4.12. ekstraktivitāt (extract content in the dry matter% barley, malting group); 1.4.13. grain fractions% above 2.5 mm (malting group); 1.4.14. the protein content,% (malting Group (N x 6.25)). 1.5. assessment of the OAT varieties 1.5.1. Cereal production: a field trial pointer: 1.5.1.1. grain yield at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 1.5.1.2. the grain yield,% (compared to the standard); 1.5.1.3. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 1.5.1.4. plant length, cm; 1.5.1.5. vegetation period, days; 1.5.1.6.1000 grain mass, g; Quality indicators: 1.5.1.7. storage volume, g l-1; 1.5.1.8., plēkšņainīb%; 1.5.1.9. kuļamīb,% (kailgraud of oats); 1.5.1.10. content,% protein; 1.5.1.11. fat content,%; 1.5.2. Green fodder production: a field trial pointer: 1.5.2.1. Green harvest, t ha-1; 1.5.2.2. the plant length, cm; 1.5.2.3. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 1.5.2.4. dry matter yield t ha-1; 15.2.5. dry matter yield,% (compared to the standard); 1.5.2.6. vegetation period, days; Quality indicators: 1.5.2.7. dry matter content,%; 1.5.2.8. crude protein content in dry matter,%. 1.6. Buckwheat varieties evaluation field trials indicators: 1.6.1. grain harvest at (his nuts), standartmitrum t ha-1; 1.6.2. grain yield (his nuts)% (compared to the standard); 1.6.3. veldr resistance, ballroom; 1.6.4. the plant length, cm; 1.6.5. the length of the vegetation period, days; 1.6.6.1000 grain (his nuts) mass (g); Quality indicators: 1.6.7. storage volume, g l-1; 1.6.8., plēkšņainīb%; 1.6.9. the protein content,%; 1.6.10. the starch content,%. 1.7. assessment of maize varieties (green fodder production) field trials indicators: 1.7.1. Green harvest, t ha-1; 1.7.2. the plant length, cm; 1.7.3. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 1.7.4. number of cob, URgab.*; 1.7.5. dry matter yield t ha-1; 1.7.6. dry matter yield,% (compared to the standard); Quality indicators: 1.7.7. dry matter content,%; 1.7.8. crude protein content in dry matter,%; 1.7.9. neutral fraction of the wood washed (NDF),% dry matter; 1.7.10. acid washed in the fibre fraction (ADF),% dry matter. 2. fodder plant economic characteristics evaluation indicators 2.1. Pea, field bean variety evaluation trials field indicators: 2.1.1. seed at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 2.1.2. seed yield,% (compared to the standard); 2.1.3. veldr resistance, ballroom; 2.1.4. the plant length, cm; 2.1.5. the length of the vegetation period, days; 2.1.6. the mass of 1000 seeds, g; Quality indicators: 2.1.7. protein content,%. 2.2. the White Lupin, blue Lupin and yellow lupin, varieties of assessment 2.2.1. seed production: a field trial pointer: 2.2.1.1. seed yield at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 2.2.1.2. seed yield,% (compared to the standard); 2.2.1.3. veldr resistance, ballroom; 2.2.1.4. plant length, cm; 2.2.1.5. vegetation period, days; 2.2.1.6. the mass of 1000 seeds, g; Quality indicators: 2.2.1.7. the protein content,%. 2.2.2. the Green fodder production: a field trial pointer: 2.2.2.1. Green harvest, t ha-1; 2.2.2.2. the plant length, cm; 2.2.2.3. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 2.2.2.4. the dry matter yield, t ha-1; 2.2.2.5. the dry matter yield,% (compared to the standard); 2.2.2.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; Quality indicators: 2.2.2.7. the content of dry matter,%; 2.2.2.8. the crude protein content in dry matter,%. 2.3. evaluation of varieties of grasses, field trials indicators: 2.3.1 ziemcietīb (except the one the airen), ballroom; 2.3.2. the Green harvest, t ha-1; 2.3.3. the number of days till the first mowing results (before flowering), days (*); 2.3.4. the plant length, cm; 2.3.5. veldr resistance, ballroom; 2.3.6. the dry matter yield, t ha-1; 2.3.7. the dry matter yield,% (compared to the standard); Quality indicators: 2.3.8. the content of dry matter,%; 2.3.9. the crude protein content in dry matter,%. 2.4. Summer vetch, winter vetch, oil rutk and evaluation of varieties of California Bluebell Green fodder production field trials indicators: 2.4.1. Green harvest, t ha-1; 2.4.2. the plant length, cm; 2.4.3. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 2.4.4. the dry matter yield, t ha-1; 2.4.5. the dry matter yield,% (compared to the standard); 2.4.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; Quality indicators: 2.4.7. the content of dry matter,%; 2.4.8. crude protein content in dry matter,% (oil rutk, California Bluebell); 2.4.9. crude protein content in dry matter,% (vetches) organic and conventional farming). 2.5. legumes varieties not listed above, the evaluation of field trials indicators: 2.5.1. ziemcietīb, ballroom; 2.5.2. the Green harvest, t ha-1; 2.5.3. the number of days till the first mowing results (at the beginning of flowering), days (*); 2.5.4. the plant length, cm; 2.5.5. veldr resistance, ballroom; 2.5.6., dry matter yield t ha-1; 2.5.7. dry matter yield,% (compared to the standard); Quality indicators: 2.5.8. the content of dry matter,%; 2.5.9. the crude protein content in dry matter,%. 3. Oil and fibre plants, economic indicators for the assessment of characteristics 3.1. varieties of Swede rape and turnip rape field trial evaluation indicators: 3.1.1. seed at standartmitrum, t ha-1; 3.1.2. seed yield,% (compared to the standard); 3.1.3. ziemcietīb (winter rape and winter Rep), ballroom; 3.1.4. veldr resistance, ballroom; 3.1.5. the plant length, cm; 3.1.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; 3.1.7. the oil yield,% (compared to the standard); Quality indicators: 3.1.8. storage volume, g l-1; 3.1.9. the oil content,% *. 3.2. evaluation of flax varieties 3.2.1.: flax field trials indicators: 3.2.1.1. straw yield t ha-1; 3.2.1.2. straw yield,% (compared to the standard); 3.2.1.3. veldr resistance, ballroom; 3.2.1.4. the length of the vegetation period (up to dzeltengatavīb), days (*); 3.2.1.5. the plant length, cm quality indicators: 3.2.1.6. the average length of a handful, cm 3.2.1.7. bast content%. 3.2.2. The oil line: field trials indicators: 3.2.2.1. seed yield, t ha-1; 3.2.2.2. seed yield,% (compared to the standard); 3.2.2.3. veldr resistance, ballroom; 3.2.2.4. the length of the vegetation period (up to the attainment of maturity of the seed), days (*); 3.2.2.5. the plant length, cm; 3.2.2.6. oil yield,% (compared to the standard); Quality indicators: 3.2.2.7. oil content,%. 3.3. Media evaluation of varieties of hemp grown for fibre hemp 3.3.1: field trials indicators: 3.3.1.1. straw yield t ha-1; 3.3.1.2. straw yield,% (compared to the standard); 3.3.1.3. the length of the vegetation period (up to a full phase of flowering), days (*); 3.3.1.4. plant length, cm quality indicators: 3.3.1.5. bast content,% *. 3.3.2. cannabis Oil: field trials indicators: 3.3.2.1. seed yield, t ha-1; 3.3.2.2. seed yield,% (compared to the standard); 3.3.2.3. the length of the vegetation period (up to the attainment of maturity of the seed), days (*); 3.3.2.4. the plant length, cm; 3.3.2.5. the oil yield,% (compared to the standard); Quality indicators: 3.3.2.6. oil content,%. 3.4. White mustard varieties evaluation field trials indicators: 3.4.1 green harvest, t ha-1; 3.4.2. the plant length, cm; 3.4.3. veldr resistance, ballroom **; 3.4.4. the dry matter yield, t ha-1; 3.4.5. dry matter yield,% (compared to the standard); 3.4.6. the length of the vegetation period, days; Quality indicators: 3.4.7. content of dry matter,%; 3.4.8. the crude protein content in dry matter,%. 4. the economic characteristics of potato varieties evaluation indicators 4.1 early potato varieties of field trial evaluation of indicators: 4.1.1 tuber yield of 45 days after the sadīgšan, t ha-1; 4.1.2. the medium and large tuber (hereinafter – trade tuber) yield of 45 days after the sadīgšan, t ha-1; 4.1.3. the tuber yield,% (compared with standartšķirn in 45 days after the sadīgšan); 4.1.4. tuber yield 55 days after sadīgšan, t ha-1; 4.1.5. the tuber yield 55 days after sadīgšan, t ha-1; 4.1.6. the tuber yield,% (compared with 55 days after the standartšķirn of the sadīgšan); 4.1.7. the yield at the end of vegetation period, t ha-1; 4.1.8. the yield at the end of vegetation period,% (compared to standartšķirn); 4.1.9. the tuber yield at the end of vegetation period, t ha-1; 4.1.10. the tuber yield at the end of vegetation period,% (compared to standartšķirn); 4.1.11. the length of the vegetation period (from sadīgšan (full sadīgšan phase) until the death of stem) days; 4.1.12. the average mass of tubers, g; 4.1.13. taste, ballroom; 4.1.14. the starch content of the tubers,%; 4.1.15. resistance to diseases: 4.1.15.1. stem infection by stem rot (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.1.15.2. stem infection with the page early blight (Alternari-Solana),%; 4.1.15.3. tuber infection by stem rot (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.1.15.4. tuber infection with wet rot (Pseudomonas fluorescent, Xanthomonas spp., Clostridium spp.),%; 4.1.15.5. tuber infection with dry rot (Fusarium spp., and Phoma foveat)%. 4.2. the early and moderate average late and late varieties of potatoes, field trial evaluation of indicators: 4.2.1. harvest at the end of vegetation period, t ha-1; 4.2.2. yield at the end of vegetation period,% (compared to standartšķirn); 4.2.3. the tuber yield at the end of vegetation period, t ha-1; 4.2.4. the tuber yield at the end of vegetation period,% (compared to standartšķirn); 4.2.5. the length of the vegetation period (from sadīgšan (full sadīgšan phase) until the death of stem) days; 4.2.6. taste, ballroom; 4.2.7. the average mass of tubers, g; 4.2.8. the starch content of the tubers,%; 4.2.9. starch yield,% (compared to standartšķirn); 4.2.10. the content of dry matter,% of tubers; 4.2.11 involving resistance to diseases:. 4.2.11.1. stem infection by stem rot (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.2.11.2. plants of the infection with the page early blight (Alternari-Solana),%; 4.2.11.3. tuber infection by stem rot (Phytophtor-infestan),%; 4.2.11.4. tuber infection with wet rot (Pseudomonas fluorescent, Xanthomonas spp., Clostridium spp.),%; 4.2.11.5. tuber infection with dry rot (Fusarium spp., and Phoma foveat)%.
The notes. 1. Pointer determines the information, but shall not be taken into account when assessing the economic characteristics of varieties in accordance with Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rule no. 518 "plant variety evaluation of economic characteristics" of Annex 8. 2. Indicators are taken into account in assessing the suitability of the variety only in organic farming.
2. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 varieties evaluation information be contained in the submissions 1. information on the applicant: 1.1. legal person-name, legal address, registration number in the register of companies or commercial register, contact information (e.g., phone number, e-mail address); 1.2. a natural person – given name, surname, personal code, residence address, contact information (e.g., phone number, e-mail address). 2. Applicant – the breeder, the breeder's right, the maintainer of the variety (varieties for which no breeder), the breeder, the breeder of the variety of the right holder or the authorized representative. 3. information about the breeder: 3.1 legal person – name, registration number in the register of companies or commercial register, address, nationality, contact information (e.g., phone number, e-mail address); 3.2. a natural person – given name, surname, personal code, address, nationality, contact information (e.g., phone number, e-mail address). 4. information about the maintainer of the variety: 4.1 a legal person – name, registration number in the register of companies or commercial register, address, nationality, contact information (e.g., phone number, e-mail address); 4.2. a natural person – given name, surname, personal code, address, nationality, contact information (e.g., phone number, e-mail address). 5. Plant species extended Latin name, indicating the genus, species, subspecies, variety. 6. Plant species name Latvian language. 7. the name of the variety or the breed name of the proposal (if it is not recognized) and provisional designation (if any). 8. Country in which the variety was created. 9. Information on whether the variety has been genetically modified. 10. information on how the variety is logged for evaluation of economic characteristics: 10.1. conventional agriculture; 10.2. organic farming. 11. information on breed characteristic (such as cereals, winter crops or summer shape kailgraud or spelt, barley-a form of gleaning the number of kanš use: for production of green fodder or grain, barley, malt, potatoes-harvest maturity (agrīnum), Lupin (except perennial)-use: Green fodder production or seed production, flax oil or fibre, hemp-oil or fibre, tag or variety is a hybrid (and hybrid type)) and on the which type to consider raising the variety trial. An indication that the appropriate group for the species in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 rule no. 518 "the economic properties of the plant variety evaluation rules" breed test annex 4.1. 12. "all the information I would like to receive electronically" (indicates if the applicant all the information related to the evaluation of the variety of wanting to get to the specified e-mail address). 13. the date, signature and stamp.
Note the. Document properties "date", "signature" and "stamp" does not fill in, if an electronic document is drawn up according to the law on electronic document design.
3. the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 sites variety evaluation trials for No field. PO box Species, varieties of the evaluation group (specify if different trial sites for different groups of the evaluation) Trial of conventional agriculture in place of organic farming sites number of sites number of sites sites 1. Soft wheat (winter form) 3 Latvian Agricultural University (LL) agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LUA Institute scientific agricultural Institute "LL" in the agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" of the trial site * Scientific Institute "Agroresurs and economic Institute" (with) the Billboard's Research Center Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" 2. Rye 3 with the Research Centre to the Booth to the Bench of the 2nd research centre of the Faculty of Agriculture of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" * test site Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" with priekuļi Research Centre for 3. Triticale 3 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" with the 2 Stands for the research centre with priekuļi Research Centre Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute, Faculty of agriculture" LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" * test location 4. Barley (winter form) 2 with the Bench's Research Centre to the Booth with 2 Research Centre of the Faculty of Agriculture of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" LL "of Scientific Institute of the agricultural Institute" 5. Soft wheat (summer form), durum wheat (summer form) 3 LL teaching and research farm "Vecauc" 2 LUA Institute scientific agricultural Institute "LL" Scientific Institute "Institute for agriculture" by Billboard's research center of the Faculty of Agriculture of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" of the trial site * 6. Barley (summer form all groups) 3 of the agricultural faculty of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LUA Institute scientific agricultural Institute "LL" in the agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" * test site with the Billboard's Research Centre Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" 7. Oats, oat kailgraud 2 with the Billboard's Research Center 2 LUA Institute scientific agricultural Institute "LL" Scientific Institute "Institute for agriculture" by priekuļi Research Centre 8. 2 LL maize agriculture faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LUA Institute scientific farming "Institute" with the research centre with priekuļi priekuļi Research Centre for 9. Buckwheat 2 LUA agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" * test site 2 with the Research Centre to the Booth of the Scientific Institute "LL agricultural Institute" Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" 10. Sowing peas, field beans 2 with the Billboard's Research Centre to the Booth 2 with research centre Scientific Institute LUA "agricultural Institute" LUA Scientific Institute "Agricultural Institute" 11. Rape (winter form all groups), turnip rape (winter form) 3 with Bench-Research Centre for 2 with the Bench's research center of the Faculty of Agriculture of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" LL "of Scientific Institute of the agricultural Institute of the Scientific Institute" LL "agricultural Institute" 12. Rape (summer form all groups), turnip rape (summer form) 3 of the agricultural faculty of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" with the 2 Billboard's Research Center Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute, Faculty of agriculture" LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" * test site 13. Potatoes with 2 of priekuļi Research Centre to the Booth with 2 Research Centre Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" 14. White Lupin, blue Lupin, yellow lupin, vetch, winter vetches, radish oil, California Bluebell 2 LUA agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LUA Institute scientific farming "Institute" with the research centre with priekuļi priekuļi Research Centre for 15. 2 with the Stand of grasses Research Centre to the Booth with 2 Research Centre Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" 16. The Fabaceae species not mentioned above 2 Faculty of agriculture LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" with the 2 Billboard's Research Center Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" 17. Lucerne, Lucerne 2 hybrid with the Billboard's Research Centre to the Booth with 2 Research Centre of the Faculty of Agriculture of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" of priekuļi Research Centre 18. Line 2 LUA agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" * test site 2 with the Research Centre to the Booth of the Scientific Institute "LL agricultural Institute" Scientific Institute "LUA agricultural Institute" 19. Media 2 LL cannabis farming faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" * test site 2 with the Research Centre to the Booth of the Faculty of Agriculture of LL teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" LL "of Scientific Institute of the agricultural Institute" 20. White mustard 2 LUA agricultural faculty teaching and research farm "Pēterlauk" 2 LUA Institute scientific farming "Institute" with the research centre with priekuļi priekuļi Research Centre to annex 4 of the Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 evaluation of varieties charges No. PO box One variety of a species assessment in one trial instead of one year (in euros) total field trials quality analysis and administrative expenses 1. Common wheat, durum wheat 249 185 64 2. Barley 242 185 57 3. Rye 249 185 64 4. Oats 249 185 64 5. Triticale 249 185 64 6. Buckwheat, maize 256 185 71 7. Sowing peas, field peas, white Lupin, blue Lupin, yellow lupin, vetch, winter vetches, radish oil, California Bluebell 249 185 64 8. Rape, turnip rape, white mustard 249 185 64 9. Grasses, legumes (species not mentioned above) 246 185 61 10. Potatoes 256 188 68 11. Flax (fibre), hemp (fiber) 256 185 71 12. Flax (oilseed), cannabis (oil) 249 185 64 note. * Value added tax does not apply under the value added tax Act, article 3 of the eighth. "
24. To supplement the provisions of this annex in the 4.1 version: "4.1 Annex Cabinet 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 varieties evaluation group i. 1. Cereal rye (Secale cereale L.): winter rye 1.1 līnijšķirn; 1.2. the winter rye hybrid varieties. 2. the common wheat (Triticum aestivum l.): 2.1 winter wheat; 2.2. summer wheat. 3. Durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.)-summer form. 4. Barley (hordeum vulgare l.): 4.1 Winter barley; 4.2. the summer barley: 4.2.1. kailgraud barley; 4.2.2. the grain group; 4.2.3. malt group. 5. Oats (Avena sativa l.): 5.1 the grain group; 5.2. Group of green fodder. 6. Kailgraud of oats (Avena nude L.). 7. the hybrids resulting from the crossing of species with the genus Triticum Secale species in the genus (x Triticosecale Wittm. ex a. Camus) (hereinafter referred to as Triticale): 7.1. winter triticale; 7.2. summer Triticale. 8. Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). 9. Corn (Zea mays l.) – Green fodder production. II. Fodder plants 10 pea (Pisum sativum l. (partim)) seed extraction: 10.1 baltzied peas; 10.2. sārtzied peas. 11. White Lupin (Lupinus Albus L.): 11.1. seed production; 11.2. Green fodder production. 12. Blue Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius l.): 12.1. seed production; 12.2. the Green fodder production. 13. Yellow Lupin (Lupinus luteus l.): 13.1. seed production; 13.2. the Green fodder production. 14. Red clover (Trifolium pratense l.): 14.1. early clover; 14.2. the average clover; 14.3. the late clover. 15. Auzeņairen (hybrids resulting from the crossing of species with the genus Festuca Lolium genus species) (x festulolium Asch. & Graebn.): 15.1 Reed Fescue with grazing airen (x festulolium holmbergi (Dörfl.) P. Fourn. Festuca arundinacea × Lolium perenne l.); 15.2. meadow Fescue to grazing airen (x festulolium loliace (HUDs.) P. Fourn. Festuca pratensis HUDs × Lolium perenne l.). III. Oil and fibre plants plants 16. Rape (Brassica napus l. (partim)): 16.1. winter rape: 16.1.1. līnijšķirn; 16.1.2. the hybrid varieties, with the exception of the annex referred to in paragraph 16.1.3. varieties; 16.1.3. CL hybrid varieties; 16.2. summer rape: 16.2.1. līnijšķirn; 16.2.2. the hybrid varieties, with the exception of the annex referred to in paragraph 16.2.3. varieties; 16.2.3. CL hybrid varieties. 17. Turnip rape (Brassica rapa l. var. silvestris (LAM.) Briggs): 17.1. winter turnip rape; 17.2. summer turnip rape. 18. in flax (Linum usitatissimum l.): 18.1. fibre flax; 18.2 linseed oil. 19. Sowing hemp (cannabis sativa l.): 19.1. hemp grown for fibre; 19.2. cannabis oil. 20. White mustard (sinapis Alba l.) – Green fodder production. IV. 21. Potatoes: Potato 21.1. early breed; 21.2. the medium early variety; 21.3. the average late varieties; 21.4. delayed variety.
The notes. The other species of fodder plants checks every individual species as a single group. ** Group creates after the first of the breed to the inclusion of the catalogue of varieties of plants. "
25. Make 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the annex by the following: "5. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 recommended seeding rules No. p. k. Species or groups of species of germinable seeds per 1 m2. 1.1. Cereals Soft wheat (winter) 400-550 1.2. Soft wheat (summer), durum wheat (summer) 500 – 600 1.3. Winter rye (līnijšķirn) 400-550 1.4. Winter rye (hybrids) 200-250 1.5. Winter triticale 400 – 550 1.6. Summer Triticale 500 – 550 1.7. Oat (grain) 500 – 600 1.8. Oats (green fodder) 530-630 1.9. Winter barley 350-400 1.10. Summer barley (kailgraud, group, malt grain) 400-450 1.11. Buckwheat 250-300 1.12. Corn (green fodder production) 8-10 2. (A) fodder plants) grasses 2.1. Alopecurus pratensis 1300 – 1500 2.2. Cocksfoot 1400 – 1600 2.3. 600-800 high tall oatgrass 2.4. Meadow Fescue 1000 – 1200 2.5. Tall Fescue 1100 – 1400 2.6. The 1200-1400 Miežabrāl 2.7. Bezakot grass 700 – 900 2.8. Timothy 2500-2900 2.9. Perennial ryegrass 1000-1300 2.10. Hybrid ryegrass 1000-1300 2.11. Auzeņairen 1000-1300 2.12. Italian ryegrass, annual 1000-1200 in 2.13. White bent 6000 – 6200 2.14. Creeping bent 5000-7000 2.15. Brown top 5000-7000 2.16. Red fescue, 1500-1800, 2.17. Sheep Fescue 2200 – 2700 2.18. Meadow grass 3700-4000 2.19. Swamp meadowgrass 4500-5000 2.20. The usual 4500-5000 b) grass, Legumes 2.21. Red clover (early, middle, late) 500 – 700 2.22. Alsike clover 1300 – 1500 2.23. White clover 1200-1400 2.24. Lucerne 800 – 1100 2.25. Hybrid alfalfa in the 600-900 2.26. East 300-500 2.27 Galega. The vanagnadziņ 700-900 horned 2.28. Sowing esparset 300-400 2.29. Pea (baltzied, sārtzied) 100-120-150 2.30. Summer vetches (green fodder production) 120 – 150 2.31. Field beans 50-60 2.32. White Lupin 100 – 130 2.33. Blue Lupin 100 – 130 2.34. Yellow lupin 100-130) other species (c) 2.35. California Bluebell (green fodder production) 100-150 2.36. Oil radish (green fodder production) 80-120 3. Oil and fibre plants 3.1. Rape (winter form hybrid varieties) 60-80 3.2. Rape (winter form līnijšķirn), turnip rape (winter form) 80-100 3.3. Rape (summer form hybrid varieties) 60-80-100 3.4. Rape (summer form līnijšķirn), turnip rape (summer form) 80-100-120 3.5. Flax (fibre) 1800-2000 3.6. Flax (oil extraction) 600-700 3.7. Sowing hemp (fibre) 550-600 3.8. Sowing hemp (oil extraction) 200 – 300 3.9. White mustard (green fodder production) 80-120 4. Potatoes (early, early, on average the average late and late varieties) 5-6 Annex 6 Cabinet 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 square accounting area No. PO box Species or group of species in the Field tracking area, m2 (minimum) 1. Cereals, oilseeds and fibre plants 10 2. Fodder plants 10 3. Potatoes, 25 4. Early potatoes crop growth dynamic discovery for 2 × 5 7. attachment Cabinet 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 evaluation methods of varieties 1. Ziemcietīb assessment Ziemcietīb assessment 1.1 rape and the rape of Ziemcietīb 1 Rep and Rep to evaluate the pilot fields, plant stocking level in two marked locations, spaced evenly around the square area, use the 0.5 m2 large carrying box. Counting frame position in spring and autumn. 2. the accounts shall be kept in each iteration, the autumn before wintering and spring after restoration of vegetation. 3. Each site evaluated separately, rating counts and divided by two. 4. Ziemcietīb calculated as a percentage of the spring (spring plant stocking level records against the autumn plant stocking level records) (table 1). 1. table of colza and rape ziemcietīb assessment No. PO box Assessment the assessment of the balls, Ziemcietīb (spring of the survivors, the percentage of plants compared to autumn plant) 1. 9 91-100% 2. 8 81-90% 3. 7 71-80% 4. 6 61-70% 5. 5 50-60% 6. 4 36-49% 7. 3 26-35% 8. 2 16-25% 9. 1 0-15% 1.2. evaluation of Ziemcietīb other species 5. Ziemcietīb assessment of other species visually evaluate the State of a volume of sowing in autumn before wintering and spring after vegetation recovery according to table 2 of this annex. table 2 assessment of the volume No. PO box Assessment of the position of the balls, Volume (fall, spring) 1. 9 very good stocking level normal (izretošan visually perceptible, is also not a place with live plants), plant health 2. 8   3. 7 good stocking level of not less than 75% of normal, healthy plants 4. 6   5. 5 medium, stocking level of not less than 50% of normal, plants with few signs of disease 6. 4   7. 3 bad stocking level is not less than 25% of the normal, the plants ill 8. 2 very bad stocking level of less than 25% 9. 1 Plant fully died 6. Ziemcietīb assessment of the balls used in table 3 of this annex, which reads ziemcietīb rating according to the volume of spring and autumn. table 3 estimation of the Volume of the Ziemcietīb State in the autumn (Ballroom) 1-2 1 9 3 1 8 9 4 1 7 8 9 5 1 6 7 8 9 6 1 5 6 7 8 9 7 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb (Ballroom) Volume position spring (Ballroom) 7. If the volume is not uniform, the square is subdivided into several equal parts, and each part is assessed separately. Ratings count and amount divided by the square of the number of shares average square. 2. Resistance to veldr 8. veldr resistance of the two stages. As soon as the veldr appears, note the plant development stage and degree of veldrēšan. The final evaluation shall be carried out before the harvest. If veldrēšan is not smooth, it is assessed separately by the square parts and calculates the average. Degree of Veldrēšan is determined by visually evaluating the deviation from the vertical position of the straw balls in accordance with table 4 of this annex. table 4 assessment of resistance to veldr No. PO box Volume status assessment balls 1. Veldr no stalks in vertical position 9 2.   8 3. Veldr is a small, all the straw hanging tilt of up to 30 ° or 3/4 of the straw hanging downwards to 45 °, or 1/2 of the straw hanging downwards to 60 °, or 1/4 blade tilt up to 90 ° in hanging 7 4.   6 5. Veldr medium, all the straw hanging up to 45 ° or slope 3/4 blade hanging downwards to 60 °, or 1/2 of the straw hanging up to 90 ° tilt 5 6.   4 7. Veldr is strong, all the stalks leaning in to 60 ° or slope 3/4 blade tilt up to 90 ° in hanging 3 8.   2 9. Veldr is very strong, all the straw hanging 1 3 90 ° inclination to the length of 9. plant plant measured in duplicate, that don't. 10. The square in two places in equal distances from the square ends of the size of the plant length of this annex, paragraph 13. 11. The measurement shall be carried out with mērkok, in which the section marked in centimeters. 12. the length of the Plant variety shall be calculated as the average measurement result, rounded to an integer. 13. the plant length is measured as follows: 13.1. cereals (except buckwheat and maize) plant measured in dzeltengatavīb during the development phase by measuring the length of the plant from the soil to the prejudice of the last vārpiņ/top (not including the rachis); 13.2. buckwheat plant measured when they reach the technical readiness (70-75% of his nuts ripen) by measuring the length of the plant from the soil to the top end of the inflorescence; 13.3. the length of the maize plant full of blooming phase by measuring the length of the plant from the soil up to the end of the straw; 13.4. sowing peas, field beans, white Lupin, blue Lupin and yellow lupin plant length of the flowering phase-hull in the early stage of development, measured the length of the plant from the soil to the stem end; 13.5. oil and fibre plants, vegetable plants, the length of the full flowering stage of plant length, measured from the soil up to the end of the stalk or stem; 8.5. annual species, which are rated Green fodder crop, the length of the plants before harvest, measured the length of the plant from the soil up to the end of the stalk or stem; 8.5. the perennial grasses and legumes of the length of the plant before the first mowing results by measuring the length of the plant from the soil up to the end of the stalk or stem. 4. E. G., phenology observations 4.1. determination of the vegetation period of 14 cereals cereals (except buckwheat) summer form varieties, which evaluate grain yield, the length of the vegetation period days down from 11 to 92. plant phase, but cereals form summer varieties, which evaluates the Green harvest – from 11 to 65. plant phase after the decimal code system. 15. winter crops of cereal varieties of vegetation form the length of days determined from January 1 to 92. plant phase after the decimal code system. Additional finds and points: 15.1 the end of vegetation period fall winter wheat and Triticale. For vegetation period is considered the last of the five days in which the average daily temperature is above 5 ° C, winter rye, of 4 ° (C), but rapidly decreasing the temperature below 0 ° C, the temperature decrease – the first day. If vegetation winter period temporarily renewed their notes; 15.2. recovery of vegetation in the spring. 16. Buckwheat of vegetation period length of days determined from the phase of full seedlings ready for harvest. 17. Corn (green fodder), the length of the vegetation period of days determined from the phase of full seedlings up to piengatavīb. 4.2. determination of the vegetation period fodder plants 18. Sowing peas, field beans, white Lupin, blue Lupin, and yellow lupin seed production for the vegetation period the length of days determined from the phase of full seedlings ready for harvest. 19. Winter vetches growing length of days determined from 1 January until harvest preparedness. In addition to the notes and the State: 19.1. the end of vegetation period fall and recovery of vegetation in the spring. For vegetation period is considered the last of the five days in which the average daily temperature is above 5 ° C, but rapidly decreasing the temperature below 0 ° C, the temperature decrease – the first day. If vegetation winter period temporarily renewed their notes; 19.2. renewal of vegetation in the spring. 20. the perennial grasses and legumes in determines the number of days from the beginning or from vegetation restoration in spring to the first mowing results, i.e.: 20.1. to skarošan/vārpošan to early stages of grasses; 20.2. to flowering phase for legumes; 20.3. in addition to the notes of the vegetation break the fall and rejuvenation in the spring, when the average daily temperature is above 0 ° c. 21. Annuals fodder plants, assess the Green harvest, the length of the vegetation period of days determined from the phase of full seedlings ready for harvest at the beginning of flowering. 4.3. Vegetation period determination of oil and fibre plants 22. Summer rape and summer Rep the vegetation period the length of days determined from the phase of full seedlings ready for harvest. 23. Winter rape and winter Rep to the length of the vegetation period of days determined from 1 January to 89. plant phase after the decimal code system. Winter rape and winter addition to the Rep notes: 23.1. vegetation period in autumn. For vegetation period fall to be the last of the five days, with an average daily temperature of less than 3 ° C and 2 ° c Rep rape but, rapidly decreasing the temperature below 0 ° C, the temperature decrease – the first day; 23.2. vegetation recovery, noted at page growth. 24. the Line of vegetation period length of days determined from the phase of full seedlings until early dzeltengatavīb phase. 25. the sowing of hemp growing length of days determined from the seedlings to full phase: 25.1. harvesting the preparedness – oil hemp; 25.2. to full flowering phase – fibre hemp. 26. White mustard growing length of days determined from the phase of full seedlings until the beginning of flowering. 4.4. determination of the vegetation period potatoes 27. Early potatoes growing length of days determined from the phase of full seedlings to stem death. 28. On average, early and late and delayed the average potato vegetation period is determined from the phase of full seedlings to stem the destruction or death. 5. Cereals, forage plants and oilseeds harvest 29. determining seed German vintage ready, it is: 29.1. cereals (except buckwheat)-89-91 plant development stage; 29.2. buckwheat-87-88. plant development stage; 29.3. pea, 87-88. plant development stage; 29.4. fields of beans, white Lupin, blue Lupin, yellow lupin-85-88. plant development stage; 29.5. rape, Rep: 85-89. plant development stage; 29.6. flax oil – when the seedpods and apžuvuš nobrūnējuš (if you shake the seed pods, they grab); 18.5. cannabis-seed oil have become gray and is parted leaves surrounding the nuts. 30. first harvested the crop, isolation and exclusion zones. Saveldrējušo plants leaned from the insulating track. Specifies the field of the area of accounting, adjusting their size in relation to exclusions, if any. 31. the harvesting begins with the early varieties. First harvested all the repetitions in a row one variety, then according to the variety, the time of ripening all the repetitions to each subsequent variety. After each field harvesting combine several minutes kept idling, to prevent the accumulation of grain or seed Harvester junctions. If the readiness of varieties all varieties are equal, the first of all the varieties harvested in one iteration and then the next. 32. the yield from each square (repeat) after churning in a separate bag and placed in a single label, the other affixed to the bag. Harvest the fields or warehouses weighing to the nearest 0.01 kg. The weighing of each bag (repeat) iegrābum and prepare for each variety one pooled sample in accordance with the standard LVS EN ISO 24333 + AC: 2011 "cereals and cereal products. Sampling (ISO 24333:2009) and LVS EN ISO 542:2001 "oil seeds-sampling". 33. the joint sample mass must be such that after drying and separation of impurities should not be less than 1 kg (peas, beans and lupins-2 kg, 0.5 kg of oil, barley, kailgraud, 1.5 kg). The combined sample in a special packaging that does not allow moisture of the sample changes. The combined sample as soon as possible (to seed does not begin to perish) determine the purity of the standard EN-271:2000 "cereals. Methods of analysis. Determination of impurities in the cereal grain "and LVS EN ISO 658:2003" oilseeds-determination of impurities ". While the net fraction of moisture of the seed with proven ekspresiekārt or in accordance with the standard LVS 272:2000 "cereals. Methods of analysis. Grain moisture detection ". 34. the joint sample immediately dried to a moisture content, it is equal to standartmitrum or lower. Permissible humidity not more than 2.00% increase above the standartmitrum. The sample is cleaned from impurities. The samples are dried gradually so that the sample temperature does not exceed 40 ° c. From dried and purified in the joint preparation of sample average (s) sample (s) for determining the quality characteristics (peas, beans and lupins-2 kg, 1 kg of cereals, oil plants-0.5 kg). The average sample from a joint distributed sample with a special sample divider or by cross-division process. Dividing the mean samples with cruciform Division, United by the samples on a smooth, flat surface, mix thoroughly and with two slats, the bottom edge which is nosmailot, the grain aligned in the form of squares. Then evening out grains divided diagonally into four trijstūro. Two opposite triangles mass combines the average sample. Of the remaining two triangles again form a square, divided diagonally. This operation continues until the size you want the average. 35. t ha-1 the yield calculated at 100% purity and standartmitrum with two decimal places, using the following formula: X = A × (100 − B) × E where (100 − D) × 10 c X-grain (seed) produced at standartmitrum (t ha-1); A-square crop grain (seed) mass (weight) (kg); B-grain (seed) humidity (%) at the time of weighing the harvest; C-squares in the accounting area (m2); D-standartmitrum, cereals and legumes (– 14%, rape-8%, 9%, linseed – Rep – 12%, cannabis – 12%); E-purity (%).
36. Oil per hectare yield is determined using the following formula: X = (A × 92)/100) × B, where X-100 oil yield (t ha-1); A-seed at standartmitrum (t ha-1); B-oil content in dry matter (%).
37. The grain (seed oils) yield% compared to standard is calculated using the following formula: X = A × B, where X-100 grain or seed, or oil yield% compared to standartšķirn; A-number variety of grain or seeds, or oil yield (t ha-1); B-standartšķirn of grain or seeds, or oil yield (t ha-1).
6. Kuļamīb detection of barley kailgraud 38. Kuļamīb detection of barley kailgraud: 38.1. average sample from four samples taken by 100 g; 38.2. the sample is divided into two parts – the grain with plēksn and separated grain with plēksn separated (if the sample contains other impurities – varieties of flaky barley grains, they must be selected separately); 23.8. each sample calculates the percentage of the grain with a separated plēksn and the average of all samples. 7. the Textile and harvest records 39. Harvest German hand harvesting ready: 24.3. Linus fibre – early dzeltengatavīb; 24.4. hemp fibre-full flowering phase. 40. After the flax field plucking from straws, having covered evenly around a handful of each of the square, draw up a paraugkūl of each variety, diameter 15-17 cm. 41. Fibre flax straw are then tied bundles and bend over 8-10 stato outcropping. No later than in 10-12 days izkuļ seeds. Weigh the individual straw and seed. 42. Hemp grown for fibre cut 8-10 cm from the soil surface and cut of the inflorescence (plant engineering). After the cutoff of strewn straws, taking a handful of equally around a square, draw up a paraugkūl of each variety, diameter 15-20 cm. 43. Hemp grown for fibre up into separate bundles (15-20 cm in diameter) and puts the stato outcropping. Weigh the straws. 44. From the paraugkūļ line selects the straw and chopped 150 g of 2-3 cm long pieces. From paraugkūļ select 300 grams of hemp straw and chopped 2 to 3 cm long pieces. Shredder piece in the mix. For the determination of the moisture content of the sample, weigh two: line-50 g, 100 g, cannabis – each with an accuracy of 0.01 g. Oven at 100-105 ° C until constant mass is reached. Weigh to the nearest 0.01 g, last two weights weight difference should not exceed 0.02 g. Moisture content of each sample is calculated using the following formula: M = (a – b) × 100 where a M-humidity (%), a-green case (g); (b) in the case of dry mass – (g) 45. Moisture content for each variety is calculated as the average of the two samples. 46. the conversion of straw harvest at standartmitrum (t ha-1). Straw yield t ha-1 calculation at standartmitrum with two decimal places, using the following formula: X = A × (100 − B) × E where (100 − D) × 10 c X-straw harvest at standartmitrum (t ha-1); A-straw weight box (kg); B – straw harvest moisture (%) at the time of weighing; C-squares in the accounting area (m2); D-standartmitrum,% (flax and hemp straw – 19%); E-purity (%).
47. The straw yield% compared to standard is calculated using the following formula: X = A × B X-100, which straw yield,% compared to standard; (A) to produce the variety of straw (t ha-1); B-standartšķirn of straw yield (t ha-1).
48. Paraugkūl dry until moisture not greater than standartmitrum. From dried paraugkūļ shall prepare the sample average (1,5-1,6 kg) for determining the quality of analysis. 8. potato harvesting and record keeping 49. Early potato varieties of crop growth dynamic experimental harvest tubers in German: 30.5.45 days after the full accession of seedlings phase at least one breed-the first deadline; 30.6.55 days after the full accession of seedlings phase at least one breed-the second deadline. 50. The harvest at the end of vegetation period early and medium early potato varieties launched 75% when the plants started to be dzeltē and atmir Greens. Average vēlīnaj and vēlīnaj potato varieties, if necessary, the tuber development accelerated by at least 10-12 days before harvesting Greens mowed or destroyed by chemical means. 51. first stop harvesting sites, and isolation. 52. The potato yield for each replicate graded three fractions, using the template: small tubers, medium size tubers and tubers large Early varieties small tuber diameter of less than 28 mm. Medium, medium-late and vēlīnaj Potato tubers of varieties of small diameter is less than 35 mm, the elongated tubers – less than 30 mm. Large tuber diameter greater than 80 mm, the elongated tubers of more than 75 mm. Rotting tubers is collected separately weigh to the nearest 0.1, kg and includes this amount in the total harvest. Weigh each of the three factions, and factions each tuber specific gravity% yield at the end of the vegetation period. Mechanically damaged tubers, which corresponds to the size of food use, depending on the size of the item added to the heel faction. Number of tubers of varieties produced 45 days after sadīgšan or tuber yield 55 days after sadīgšan or harvest at the end of vegetation period is calculated using the following formula: R = S + N × 10 R, where L-number variety tuber yield of 45 days after the sadīgšan (t ha-1) or tuber yield 55 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1), or the harvest at the end of vegetation period (t ha-1); S-laid variety tuber weight of goods 45 days after sadīgšan (kg) mass of tubers or 55 days after sadīgšan (kg), or tuber weight in vegetation period (kg); N – number of small tubers of varieties of 45 days after the sadīgšan mass (kg) or small tubers weighing 55 days after sadīgšan (kg), or a small tuber weight in vegetation period (kg); L-square area (m2).
The variety of goods laid tuber yield of 45 days after sadīgšan or tuber yield of goods after 55 days after sadīgšan, or tuber yield at the end of vegetation period is calculated using the following formula: Rs = S × 10 where L Rs-laid variety tuber yield of goods 45 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1) or tuber yield 55 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1), or tuber yield at the end of vegetation period (t ha-1); S-laid variety tuber weight of goods 45 days after sadīgšan (kg) mass of tubers or 55 days after sadīgšan (kg), or tuber weight in vegetation period (kg); L-square area (m2).
53. Early potato varieties of crop growth dynamic experimental harvest tubers German 45 days after full phase of the seedlings, 55 days after full phase joining seedlings and vegetation at the end of the period. Harvest shares and weighs three fractions – small, medium and large. Medium-sized and big are trademarks of tubers. Weigh each faction. 54. Potatoes average tuber weight of goods shall be determined as follows: after the previous harvest sorting fractions calculate the large-and medium-sized tuber proportions% average yield of tubers all iterations by using the following formula: L = B × 100 where (B + C) L – the large tubers,%; B-large tuber weight, kg; C – average tuber weight, kg;
V = C × 100 where (B + C) V-sized tubers,%; B-large tuber weight, kg; C – average tuber weight, kg. Select a sample of 100 tubers joint (the joint fraction of samples collected, sorted, and each replicate dividing fractions by size of the tubers, and after weighing all the one faction according tubers saber together or combine) two factions, in proportion to the resulting number (so the tubers from each faction, as calculated by% 20%, for example, a large tuber-selects 20 tubers from the large tuber of the fraction, and 80 percent of the average tuber fractions). Wash the tubers weighed (g), the resulting mass divided by the number of tubers (100) and retrieves the item average tuber weight in grams.
55. the varieties of goods Laid tuber yield% (compared with standartšķirn in 45 days after the sadīgšan) or tuber yield% (compared with 55 days after the standartšķirn of the sadīgšan), or the harvest at the end of vegetation period% (compared to standartšķirn), or tuber crop vegetation period end% (compared to standartšķirn) is calculated using the following formula: A = B × 100 where C A – goods laid variety tuber yield% (compared with standartšķirn in 45 days after the sadīgšan) or tuber yield% (compared with 55 days after standartšķirn of sadīgšan) or crop vegetation period end% (compared to standartšķirn), or tuber crop vegetation period end% (compared to standartšķirn); B-goods laid variety tuber yield of 45 days after the sadīgšan (t ha-1) or tuber yield 55 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1), or the harvest at the end of vegetation period (t ha-1), or tuber yield at the end of vegetation period (t ha-1); C-standartšķirn of tuber yield goods 45 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1) or tuber yield 55 days after sadīgšan (t ha-1), or the harvest at the end of vegetation period (t ha-1), or tuber yield at the end of vegetation period (t ha-1).
56. the starch content of the product to determine the aggregate sample of tubers of 7 kg select diseases and mechanically damaged tubers. The selected wash and dry the samples. Starch content shall be determined as quickly as possible after harvest to all agrīnum group samples at one time. Sample packaging for air access. 57. the starch content of the potatoes shall be determined as follows: 57.1. using tank water, weights, two plastic or metal baskets or containers weighing 5.5 kg potatoes, stand; 57.2. pour water into the tank, which is 17.5 ° C temperature. Baskets or containers for weighing potatoes, add weight to the stand, one basket iekarin the Earth. The lower basket inserts container with water so that the cart fully iegrimt in water. Adjust the balance or scale to 0 features; 57.3. the upper basket (in the air) 5000 g dry weigh wash 5050 g of potatoes or wet potato, weigh (weight in air). Then tipped into the lower basket, which is immersed in a tank of water. Shake gently to evenly the air bubbles. Weigh the potatoes in water (the water). Starch content% read the table 5 of this annex. table 5 specific weight, dry matter and starch content of potatoes, the determination of 5 kg weight in water, the specific weight (g) dry matter,%,% 250 255 260 265 1.0526 15.12 8.17 1.0537 15.36 8.40 1.0549 15.62 8.65 270 275 280 1.0560 15.86 8.88 1.0571 16.09 9.11 1.0582 16.33 9.34 285 1.0604 1.0593 16.57 9.57 290 295 300 16.81 9.80 1.0616 17.06 10.05 1.0627 17.30 10.28 305 310 315 1.0672 18.27 11.23 1.0638 17.54 10.51 1.0650 17.80 10.77 1.0661 18.04 11.00 1.0684 18.53 11.46 320 325 1.0695 18.77 11.71 335 340 345 330 1.0707 19.03 11.96 1.0718 19.26 12.19 1.0730 19.52 12.44 350 360 355 1.0741 19.76 12.67 1.0753 20.02 12.92 1.0764 20.26 13.15 365 370 1.0799 21.01 13.88 1.0787 20.75 13.63 1.0776 20.52 13.40 375 380 385 1.0811 21.27 14.13 1.0823 21.53 14.38 1.0834 21.77 14.61 1.0846 22.03 14.86 395 390 400 405 410 1.0858 22.28 15.11 1.0870 22.54 15.36 1.0881 22.78 15.59 415 420 425 1.0893 23.04 15.85 1.0905 23.30 16.10 1.0917 23.56 16.35 430 435 440 1.0965 24.59 17.35 1.0929 23.82 16.60 1.0941 24.08 16.85 1.0953 24.33 17.10 445 450 455 460 1.0977 24.85 17.60 1.0989 25.11 17.85 1.1001 25.37 18.10 465 470 475 1.1050 26.43 19.13 1.1013 25.63 18.35 1.1025 25.89 18.60 1.1038 26.17 18.88 480 485 1.1074 26.94 19.63 1.1062 26.69 19.38 1.1086 27.20 19.88 495 490 500 510 1.1099 27.48 20.15 1.1111 27.74 20.40 505 515 520 1.1161 28.82 21.45 1.1123 28.00 20.65 1.1136 28.28 20.92 1.1148 28.54 21.18 525 530 535 540 1.1174 29.10 21.72 1.1186 29.36 21.97 1.1199 29.64 22.24 545 550 555 1.1249 30.72 23.29 1.1211 29.90 22.49 1.1223 30.16 22.74 1.1236 30.44 23.02 560 565 570 575 1.1261 30.98 23.54 1.1274 31.26 23.81 1.1299 31.80 24.33 580 585 1.1325 32.36 24.88 1.1312 32.08 24.60 1.1287 31.54 24.08 1.1338 32.64 25.15 595 590 600 610 1.1351 32.92 25.42 1.1364 33.20 25.69 605 615 1.1403 34.04 26.51 1.1377 33.48 25.96 1.1390 33.76 26.23 1.1429 34.60 27.05 630 620 625 635 1.1416 34.32 26.78 1.1442 34.88 27.32 1.1455 35.16 27.59 1.1481 35.72 28.14 650 655 640 645 1.1468 35.44 27.87 1.1494 36.01 28.41 660 665 1.1534 36.87 29.24 1.1521 36.59 28.97 1.1507 36.29 28.68 9. Perennial and annual grassland harvesting and records 58. Media of the year appļauj, the multiannual lawns, not produced. For annual grasses and annual to multiannual medium grasses for the first and second year of use the first mowing results take skarošan or phase of flushing, the legumes, the beginning of flowering. The second and third mowing results made at the beginning of the flowering grasses species and varieties that mowing results in 2 and 3 form a straw. Early clover and alfalfa for the second mowing results made at the beginning of flowering. The second mowing results more clover, as well as the third mowing results for make Lucerne and clover for about 40 days after mowing results, but not before, as have reached 25 cm length like verdure. Cutting height is not less than 5 cm. 59. first harvested the crop, isolation and exclusion zones. Specifies the field of the area of accounting, adjusting their size in relation to exclusions, if any. 60. Crop is harvested when the variety is reached harvest maturity. Harvesting begins with the early varieties. First harvested all the repetitions in a row one variety, then according to the variety, the time of ripening all the repetitions to each subsequent variety. If the readiness of varieties all varieties are equal, the first of all the varieties harvested in one iteration and then the next. 61. From every square each mowing results the Green mass is weighed (accurate to 0.1 kg) while taking one average sample of 1 kg. 62. the average weigh to the nearest 0.01 kg and graded in the variety and number of contaminated (such as other plants, successive residues). 63. the samples taken for analysis of the quality of the first mowing results average sample (with calculation, the sample can be drawn up with a mass of 1 kg quality analyses) and the variety of dry matter for the determination of crude protein. 64. the Number of varieties of green mass of each iteration each mowing results shall be calculated using the following formula: R = P × M × K × L 10 R-number variety of green mass yields the mowing results (t ha-1); P-number variety, the average mass of sample (after sorting) (kg); (K) the mass of the average before sorting (kg); M-from the square grass harvested mass (kg); L-square area (m2).
65. Green harvest variety is calculated as the number of all mowing results green harvest amount. 66. the Number of the production of the variety to the average of the samples immediately grind 2-3 cm long pieces. From the first mowing results average sample takes 1 kg sample quality analysis. 67. each mowing results for determining the moisture content of the sample, weigh out the two 50 g each to an accuracy of 0.01 g. Oven at 100-105 ° c until constant mass is reached. Weigh to the nearest 0.01 g, last two weights weight difference should not exceed 0.02 g. Moisture content of each sample is calculated using the following formula: M = (a − b) × 100 where a M-humidity (%), a-green case (g); (b) in the case of dry mass – (g).
68. the moisture content of each mowing results shall be calculated as the average of the two samples. 69. the quality analysis prepared the first mowing results the remaining portion of the sample. 20-30 minutes it heated in the 80-90 ° C to stop the action of the enzyme and micro-organism. After heating the sample to continue drying temperatures no higher than 60-65 ° C, until constant mass is reached. The dry place the cloth bag and add labels – one place inside the bag, the other affixed to the outside. 70. the Number of varieties of dry matter yield in each iteration each mowing results shall be calculated using the following formula: X = A × (100-M), which is 100 X-dry yield (t ha-1); A – green mass yield (t ha-1); M-green mass harvest of humidity (%) at the time of weighing.
71. the yield of dry matter for the variety number calculated as dry matter yields all mowing results. 72. the yield of dry matter% compared to standard is calculated using the following formula: X = A × (B) X 100, where the dry matter yield,%-compared with the standard; A – the variety of dry matter yield (t ha-1); (B) dry matter yield of standartšķirn – (t ha-1).
10. Green fodder plants (oil rutk, white mustard, California Bluebell, oats, vetch, summer white Lupin, blue Lupin, yellow lupin, corn) and harvest records 73. Oil turnips, white mustard, California Bluebell, summer 1914, white Lupin, blue Lupin and yellow lupin feed harvested at the beginning of flowering, green manure, the end of flowering. Corn is harvested as possible later on, but before the autumn frosts. Oats harvested in flower in the middle. 74. Green fodder plant harvesting, green estimates, sample preparation quality analysis, determination of the moisture content and dry matter yield calculation carried out in accordance with the perennial grasses and annuals for the methodology. 75. the number of maize Cob down five normal developed stalks. Adds advanced cobs. The average number of cob each variety. 76. Maize in each field separately lists the cob mass (bracts) and straw-sheet mass. Cobs, stalks and leaves chopped, prepares the medium sample and return it immediately to the designated laboratory quality analysis or laboratory to the hermetically sealed packaging delivered to air-dry sample (no more than 15% moisture – the oven at 55 ° C for at least 48 hours to reach a drying sample constant mass). 77. the yield of dry matter% compared to standard is calculated using the following formula: X = A × (B) X 100, where the dry matter yield,%-compared with the standard; A – the variety of dry matter yield (t ha-1); (B) dry matter yield of standartšķirn – (t ha-1).
11. The potato disease records 78. Disease registration is carried out in calendar of phytopathological accounting time limits (table 6). table 6 the accounting calendar Phytopathological No. PO box The accounting period accounting disease indicator 1. potato plants diseases 1.1. Stem rot (Phytophthora infestan) – disease appeared for the first time. Second time-10 days after the first. Three times-10 days after the second accounting degree of infection, 1.2. Stem early blight (a Sort of Solanum Alternari.) Vegetation period, when the disease symptoms of the infection, 2. The potato tuber diseases 2.1. Stem rot (Phytophtor-infestan) yield evaluation and sorting of the infected tubers,% by weight, 2.2. Wet rot (Pseudomonas fluorescent, Xanthomonas spp. Clostridium spp.) Yield evaluation and sorting of the infected tubers,% by weight of 2.3. Dry rot (Fusarium spp., and Phoma foveat) yield evaluation and sorting of the infected tubers,% by weight 79. potato plants disease down, for the entire field of Visual finding the degree of damage percentage (the damaged surface of the whole page square plant leaf surface). 80. the infected tubers%, by mass, is calculated using the following formula: A = I × 100 where S + N A-number variety in infected tubers (% by mass); S-laid variety goods tuber mass (kg); N – number of tuber varieties of small mass (kg); I-number variety of infected tubers mass (kg).
12. Long 81. evaluation of the taste of potatoes is determined by organoleptic 9 ball scales according to table 7 of this annex. table 7 evaluation of taste of potatoes No. PO box Taste evaluation balls 1. Very delicious 9 2. Delicious 7 3. Average delicious 5 4. Not delicious 3 5. Very delicious 1 82. potato varieties taste qualities valued in all varieties, tasting the assessment places all varieties of agrīnum groups. Tasting the varieties evaluated in at least five taster. Each variety of potatoes peeled tubers Cook separate pot salt solution, 2% (20 g salt per 1 l water). Do not use apzaļot tasting tubers. When the potatoes are soft, the water is discarded and the little flame dry. Degust the warm (variety served with encrypted numbers). 13. his nuts and grains, 1000 seed weight 83. Cereals and legumes 1000 grain mass down to the standard LVS EN ISO 520: "cereals and pulses in 2011. 1000 grain mass ". 84. the mass of his nuts down 1000 to the standard LVS EN ISO 520: "cereals and pulses in 2011. 1000 grain mass ". 14. quality analysis: 85.1.85. Wheat protein, starch, sedimentation (Zeleny index), gluten-free and standard used in determining grain Infratec 1241 and program analysers, WH 280710 T4; 85.2. the fall of the number determined in accordance with the standard EN EN ISO 3093:2011 "wheat and rye grains and flours, grains of durum wheat and semolina. The determination of incidence Hagberg-Perten methods (ISO 3093:2009) ". 86. Rye and Triticale: 53.5. protein, starch and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain analyser used Infratec 1241 and program: rye-RYU 310705 T, Triticale, TR310705 T2; 86.2. number of rye falling down to the standard LVS EN ISO 3093:2011 "wheat and rye grains and flours, grains of durum wheat and semolina. The determination of incidence Hagberg-Perten methods (ISO 3093:2009) "; 86.3. number of incidence Triticale determined according to standard EN 274: in 2000 the "falling number as alpha-amylase activity in grain and flour determination by Hagberg-Perten methods". 87. the barley: 87.1. protein, starch and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain analyser used and programmes 040609 Infratec 1241 BA T3; 87.2. the grain fraction% above 2.5 mm shall be determined as follows: 87.2.1. use automatic seed-grain Eliminator-fractionator (sieve size: 1. sieve-2.8 mm, 2.5 mm 2 mesh-, 3. sieve-2.2 mm); 87.2.2. the mean of the sample divided into multiples of 100 g of the sample with, displayed on the top screen, hydrated for 3 minutes. From each sieve of impurities and damaged grains and weigh to the nearest 0.01 g. Weigh separately each fraction to the nearest 0.01 g. Sum the first and the second fraction. The amount is expressed as a percentage to an accuracy of one decimal; 101.8. ekstraktivitāt shall be determined as follows: 87.3.1. use disk mill, with an accuracy of 0.01 g in weight, iejavošan, 500-ml conical flask (by sections along the 100 ml), with a diameter of 200 mm funnel, filter paper, or the appropriate density pycnometer meter, analytical balance, with a precision of 0.01 g electric stove, density meter; 87.3.2. the mean of the sample divided into 50 g of the sample with the dealer and grind. Weigh 25 g ground barley sample. Weigh 25 g of malt barley (finely ground). The malt into the beaker, add 200 ml of distilled water and mix. The beaker is placed on the hotplate and the mixture is heated to 90 ° C, stirring it. The temperature is maintained until the starch completely saželējus. Adds so much to the mixture of cold distilled water to reduce the temperature up to 70-75 ° C. Add 1 g of ground malt and wait (about 5 minutes) until the mixture flowing. Cook for 5 to 10 minutes. Place the beaker in a iejavošan facility, turn on the mixer and a chilling sample to 45 ° c. Add remaining ground malt (about 24 g) and 100 ml of distilled water 45 ° C. When the mixture has reached a temperature of 70 ° C, add 50 ml of distilled water. Ekstraktivitāt is calculated using the following formula: EA = P × (1600 + MM + MA) – EM (%) = 100-P EA EA × 100 where 100-MA EA-ekstraktivitāt (content of barley extract sample%); EA (), ekstraktivitāt (content of barley extract (dry matter)); EM-ekstraktivitāt-malt (malt extract content (dry weight)),%; MM, moisture content,% malt; MA-moisture content (sample of barley),%; P-ekstraktivitāt (extract content) must (w/w), the amount is expressed as a percentage to an accuracy of one decimal;
87.3.3. malt extract is determined as follows: 87.3.3.1 of the average sample taken 2 x 55 g of the sample and grind disc mill (the distance between the drive of 0.20 mm). 50.0 g of the extraction flasks weigh ground malt. Miss: 50.0 g acquisition of ground malt with 200 ml of warm water (46 ° C) distilled water, mix thoroughly. Miss water bath preheated up to 45 ° c. Extraction dishes placed in a water bath and turn on the mixer. Miss 30 minutes provides 45 ° C. Then 25 minutes on the temperature raises 1 ° C to 70 ° C per minute. When the temperature reaches 70 ° C in the CIS, the extraction container, add another 100 ml of distilled water (70 ° C). 70 ° C for 1 hour in the CIS, then 10-15 minutes to cool to room temperature. Rinse the Blender in a small amount of water. The contents of the dish balance with distilled water to filtration: 450.0 g. extraction container mix the contents with a glass rod and filter immediately. The first 100 ml of the filtrate back into the stripping apparatus in the filter. Filter end when a residue test. If you miss the filter slowly, filtering, ends after 2 hours and concludes on the filtering rate; 87.3.3.2. the determination of the content of the extract is used in measuring the CIS machine Density of 30PX. The sampling tube is soaked in the CIS and, clicking on the button, the measuring apparatus, it sucked to not have air bubbles. Then press "OK" and after 3 seconds (alarm) reads the plateau in degrees; 87.3.3.3 ekstraktivitāt malt is calculated using the following formula: (a)) = E1 P × (M + 800) 100 – P b) EM = E1 × 100 where 100-M E1-extract content of the sample,% (m/m); EM-the content of the malt extract (dry matter),% (m/m); P-extract content g/100 g, Miss% plateau; M-malt moisture,% (m/m); 800-distilled water 100 g added to the malt. The amount is expressed as a percentage to an accuracy of one decimal.
88. Oats: 88.1. protein, fat and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain analyser used Infratec 1241 and OA programs 070308 EN;. plēkšņainīb 88.2 is determined as follows: 88.2.1. analysis of the sample for the direct NET weigh a fraction of grain in duplicate ~ 5 g of the sample. Grain flakes separated by preparējam the needle; 88.2.2. atplēkšņoto a bare grain weighing to the nearest 0.01 g; 88.2.3. grain plēkšņainīb calculated using the following formula: a = 100 × (P-K), where P (a)-plēkšņainīb,% of the grains; K-atplēkšņot-grain mass of the sample, g; P-sample, g;
88.2.4. plēkšņainīb is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the two results of repetition. Allowable difference between two parallel determinations carried out the amount of oat spelt grain shall not exceed 1%. If the difference is greater, the analysis must be repeated. 89. Buckwheat: 89.1. standard mass per storage volume is determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 7971-4: "Cereal in 2011. The standard "mass per hectolitre". Part 3. Usual method (ISO 7971-3:2009) "; 89.2. the protein content shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 20483:2014 "cereals and legumes. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. The Kjeldahl method "; 89.3. starch content shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 3255:2001 "natural starches. Determination of starch content. Ewers polarimetric method "; 89.4. plēkšņainīb defined as follows: 89.4.1. analysis of the sample for the direct NET, weigh a fraction of his nuts in duplicate ~ 2.5 g of the sample. To stop squeezing his nuts to a degree that allows you to separate the kernels from the skins; 89.4.2. separated WISPs weigh to the nearest 0.01 g; 89.4.3. plēkšņainīb of peanut debris is calculated using the following formula: a = K × 100 where P a − plēkšņainīb,% of his nuts; K-scale mass of the sample in g; P-sample, g;
89.4.4. plēkšņainīb is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the two results of repetition. Allowable difference between two parallel determinations carried out on the scale of his nuts-buckwheat quantity must not exceed 1%. If the difference is greater, the analysis must be repeated. 90. the rape oil and the determination of the standard mass per storage volume of grain used Infratec 1241 and program analysers 050904 T3 PRODUCTION. 91. The oil flax and hemp oil content of oil shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 646:2009 "oil seeds. Determination of oil content (reference method) (ISO 646:2009) ". 92. Sowing peas protein content shall be determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 20483:2014 "cereals and legumes. Nitrogen determination of the content and calculation of crude protein content. The Kjeldahl method (ISO 20483:2013) ". 93. the Perennial grasses and annuals crude protein content in the dry matter is determined for the first mowing results to a standard LVS EN ISO 5983-2:2009 "in animal feed. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. Part 2: mineralisation and steam distillation method (ISO 5983-2:2009) ". 94. Green fodder plants (oil rutk, white mustard, California Bluebell, summer 1914, white Lupin, blue Lupin, yellow lupin, maize, oats): 94.1. crude protein content in the dry matter determined in accordance with the standard LVS EN ISO 5983-2:2009 "in animal feed. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. Part 2: mineralisation and steam distillation method (ISO 5983-2:2009) "; 94.2. dry matter content shall be determined according to the standard EN ISO 6496:1996 "animal nutrition – moisture and other volatile matter content". 95. Maize: 95.1. neutral fraction of the wood washed (NDF) is determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 16472:2006 "in animal feed. With amilāz handle neutral detergent insoluble fiber (NDF) contents "; 95.2. acid washed wood fraction (ADF) defines the standard LVS EN ISO 13906:2008 "feed. The aqueous acid detergent fiber (ADF) and the aqueous acid detergent lignin (ADL) content discovery (ISO 13906:2008) ". 96. Field beans a protein used in determining grain Infratec 1241 and program analysers FP 310804.97. White Lupin, blue Lupin, yellow lupin in the protein content is determined according to the standard LVS EN ISO 20483:2014 "cereals and legumes. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. The Kjeldahl method (ISO 20483:2013) ". 98. the grasses dry matter content shall be determined according to the standard EN ISO 6496:1999 "animal nutrition – moisture and other volatile matter content". 99. Legumes of the dry matter content shall be determined according to the standard EN ISO 6496:1999 "animal nutrition – moisture and other volatile matter content". 100. Fibre flax and hemp bast fibre content paraugkūl. Flax from paraugkūļ will select 50 g straw, hemp-500 g straw. Sample weight is divided into two parts. The weight of each model for the determination of the content of the bast weigh two-sample 10 g 100 g flax, hemp, over to the nearest 0.01 g, grind them with the LM-3 (machine consisting of two ribbed metal reels that grind shives) and combed, and separate the shives shaking. If required, grinding is repeated until the quantity of bast the shives may exceed 10%. The balance of the sample with shives hands (on the table, which is covered with dark paper). NET, bast weigh to the nearest 0.01 g. Bast content is calculated using the following formula: C = S × 100 where L C-bast content,%; S-flax (hemp) straw weight, g; L-Bast, g. bast content for each variety is calculated as the average of the two samples.
101. If a determination of the quality indicators in Latvia not approved methodological standards, it shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted international methods. 8. the annex to Cabinet of Ministers on 24 July 2012 regulations no 518 evaluation of varieties and ball scales 1. Cereal varieties evaluation scores and ball scale 1.1. varieties of cereals for the harvest of the factors making up the ratings after the 9 ball scale scores Ballroom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb very poor poor average good very good resistance against veldr * very poor poor average good very good grain harvest ,% (compared with the standard) ** very bad < 66 66-75 76-85 86 bad-95 96-105 of 106 average-115 116-125 of 126-good 135 very good > 135 1.2. Common wheat and durum wheat varieties of grain quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom storage volume, g l-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 very low < 688 688-709 710-719 720 low − medium 730-750 751 770-771-785 of 786 high 770-799 very high > 799 protein content,% very low < 9.0 – 9.0 9,6-10,4-low 9.7 10.3 11.3 11.2 medium-11.9 12.0-13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1 – high-very high 16.0 > 16.0 gluten content,% very low < 15.0 15,0 − − 19,0 18,1 18,0 19,1-low 22 medium high-22.1-23,0 23,1 25.0 25.1-29,0 very high > 1000 grain mass 29.0 winter wheat, g very low < 27.0 30.9 31,0 27.0 − − − of low 35.0 34.9 average 38,9 39,0-€ 42.9 43.0 − − 47.0 50.9 51,0 46,9 high-very high of 54.0 > 54.0 1000 grain mass of summer wheat, g very low < 20.0 20,0-24.9 25.0-28,9 29,0 low − medium 33.0 32.9 − 0 − 36,9 41.9 high 42,0 − − 50.0 46.0 45,9 very high > 50.0% starch content, very low < 65.0 65,0-65,6 low 65.7-66.4-67,0 66,3 medium 67,1-67,8-68,4 high several 67,7-69,1 69.2-70.0 very high > 70 color, unit (hard wheat) very faint < 14.0 pale golden on average 15-16 17-18 19-20 gold very bright golden > Stiklainīb, 20% (hard wheat) very low 20-30 < 20.0 low 30-40 40-50 medium 50-60 60-70 high 70-80 80-90 very high > 90 varieties of rye grain 1.3 quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom storage volume, g l-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 very low < 600 600-620 621-640 641-low 660 661-680 681-medium 700 701-720 721-high 730 very high > 730 protein content,% very low < 8.0 8.0-9.0-9.9 8.9 low 10.0-11.0-12.0 10.9 average 11.9-13.0 13.9 14.0 12.9 high − − 15.0 very high > 15.0 g 1000 grain mass, the tetraploid rye very low < 30.0 30,0-low 33.9 34,0-37.9 38.0-41.9 average 42,0 − 45,9 46.0-50.9 high − − 60.0 51,0 54,9 55.0 very high > 60.0 the diploid rye very low-low 25.0 28,9 < 25.0 29 .0 − − 35.0 32.0 31.9 34.9 medium − high 41.0 40.9 37.9 38.0 − − − 43,9 44,0 46.0 very high > 46.0% starch content, very low < 60.0-60.9 60.0 low 61.0-61,9-62,0 62,9 medium 63,0 − 63,9 64,0-high eur 65.0 64.9-65,9 66.0 very high > 66 varieties of Triticale grain 1.4 quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom storage volume, g l-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 very low < 650 650-660 661-670 671-low 680 681-690-691-medium 700 701-730 731-high 750 very high > 750 protein content,% very low < 8.0 8.0-9.0-9.9 8.9 low 10.0-11.0-12.0 10.9 average 11.9-13.0 13.9 14.0 12.9 high − − 15.0 very high > 15.0 g 1000 grain mass, very low-low 33.9 31,0 31.0 < 34,0-36 9-0 40.0 39.9 medium − high 47.0 43,9 44,0-46,9-50.9 51,0 – 54.0 very high > starch content, 54% very low < 61.0 61.0-62,0 low 62.1-63,0 63,1-64,0 medium 64,1 − 65,0 eur 65,1-66.0 66.1-67,0 67,1 is high – very high 68,0 > 68 varieties of barley grain on 1.5. quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom storage volume, g l-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 very low < 550 550-570-571-590 591 low-600 601-620 621-mid-650 651-681-high 680 700 very high > storage volume, 700 g l-1 (kailgraud-barley) very low < 650 650-670 671-690 691 low-700 701-720 721-average 750 751-780 of 781 high-very high 800 > 800 protein content ,% (grain group) very low < 8.1 8.1-9.1 10.0 9.0 low – 10.1-12.0-13.0 13.1 average 12.1-14.1-15.1 15.0 14.0 high-very high 17.0 > 1000 grain weight 17.0 g very low < 34,1-34.1 36.0 38.0 38.1 the 36,1-low − medium 40,1 − 40.0-45.0 42,0 42,1 45,1-48.0 48.1 high-very high 50.0 > 50.0% starch content, very low < 55.0 55.0 56.6-low 58.3 58.4-60,1 56.7-medium-61,9 62,0 60,2 − − 65.4 63.6 63.7 65,3 high-very high 67,0 > Kuļamīb, 67.0% (kailgraud of barley) 20.1-25.0 + 15.1 – 25.0 > 20.0 15.0 10.0 10.1 – 5.1 – 2.6-5.0 0.1-2.5 0 protein content% (malt (N x 6.25) Group) very bad bad 12.0 11.6-12.0 average 11,1-11,5-8.9 10.1-8.0 good very good 9.0-11.0 10.0 grain fractions% above 2.5 mm (malting group) 79,1-83.1 83.0, 85.0 81,0 81,1-EUR 85.1-87,0 87.1-91.0-93,0 89,0 91,1 93,1 support – – 95,0 > 95 1.6. Oatmeal and oat varieties kailgraud grain quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom standard mass per storage volume 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g l-1 very low < 430 431-445-446-460 461-low average of 476-490 491 475-505 506 520 521 – a high-very high 535 > Plēkšņainīb, 535% very high 33.0-35.0 high 35.0 > 30.0 − − medium 24,0 26,0 32.9 29,9 − − 20.0 22.0 25.9 23,9 low − 18.0 21.9-19.9 low < Plēkšņainīb, 18.0% (kailgraud of oats) very high > 15,0 15.0 12.1-high 9.1-12.0-9.0 average 5.1-7.1 7.0 3.1-5.0-3.0 0.6 1.6-low 1.5 very low Protein content < 0.6% very low < 8.0 8.0-9.0-10.0 10.1 9.1 the low – medium – 12.0 12.1 11.1 11.0-13.0 13.1-15.1 15.0 is high – very high 16.0 > 16.0% fat content, very low < 3.5 3.5-4.0-4.5 4.6 4.1 low – medium – 5.5 5.6 5.0 5.1-6.0 6.1 6.5 6.6 – high – very high 7.0 > 7.0 1000 grain mass, g very low < 18.0 19.9 20.0 18.0-low − medium 26.0 25.9 22.9 23,0 − − − 36.0 30.9 31,0 35,9 high − − 45.0 41.0 40.9 very high > 45.0 1.7. Buckwheat varieties of his nuts the quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom storage volume, g l-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 very low < 500 501-520 521-540 541 low-560 561-580 581-medium-600 601-620 of 620 high-650 very high > Plēkšņainīb, 650% very high 24.1 25.0 high – 25.0 > 23.1-24,0-22.1 21.1-22,0 23,0 medium – low-20,1 21.0 20.0 18.0 19.0 19.1 – very low Protein content < 18.0% very low < 10.0 10,0-11,0 11.1-12.0 12.1-low 13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1-medium-high 15.1 15.0-17.0 16.0 16.1-very high > 17.0 peanut debris mass 1000 (a), (g) very low < 20.0 20,0 – 21.0 22.0 22.1-low 21.1-23,0-24,0-23.1 average 24.1 25.0 25.1-27.0 27.1 high – very high 30.0 > 30.0% starch content, very low < 52.0 53,0 53.1 52.0-low-54.0 54.1 56.0 55.0 medium – 55,1-56.1 – – 57,1 58,0 58,1 57,0 high – very high 60.0 > 60 1.8. Corn (green fodder production) assessment of varieties at the 9 ball scale scores 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 dry matter yield of Ballroom,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 content of dry matter,% 20.1-50 < 20 or > 21.9 22.0-50.0 or 48.1-23,9-24,0-46.1 48.0 or 24.9 25.9 25.0 46.0-43.1-or or-26.0-27.9 40,1 43.0 40.0 28.0-29 or 38.1- 9 or 37.1-38.0 30.0 – – – 0 32.0 31.9 or 35.0 35.1 per crude protein content in dry matter,% (N x 6.25) very low < 4.0 4,0-5,0-6,0 5,1 low 6.1 – 7.0 7.1-8.0 8.1 to medium-high 9.1 10.0 9.0-10.1-11.0 very high > 11.0 neutral fraction of the wood washed (NDF),% dry matter very high 50.0 50.0 47,1-high > 44.1-5-44,0 47.0 medium 40,1 – 42,0 38.1-40.0 34.0 – 38.0 36,1 low – very low-36.0 < 34.0 acid washed in the wood fraction (ADF),% dry matter very high > 32.0 29,1-30.1-high 32.0 30.0 28,1-29,0 medium – 27.0 27.1 26.1 28.0-low 25.1-24,0-25,0 26,0 low veldr resistance in < 24.0 * very low low medium high very high 2. The forage plant variety evaluation scores and ball scale 2.1. Pea, field beans, vetches, white Lupin, blue Lupin and yellow lupin, varieties of crops by forming factor rating scale scores 9 ball Ballroom, Ziemcietīb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9% very poor poor average good very good resistance to veldr very low low medium high very high seed yield ,% (compared with the standard) tīrsēj * very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 2.2. Pea varieties of quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the protein content in seeds% very low < 17.0 17,1 18,1 18,0 19,1-low 19.0 20.0 average – 20.1 21.1 21.0-22.0-high-22.1 23,0 23,1 – 25,0 very high > 25.0 g 1000 seed weight, very small < 100.0 100,0 – 140,9 141,0 – 181,0 – small 180,9 221,0 261,0 220,9 medium-300,9 large-301,0 260,9 – 341,0 – 370,0 very large 340,9 > 370.0 2.3. Field bean variety quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Protein content,% very low seed < 22.0 23,0 23.1 22.1 – low-24,0-25.0 average 25.1 24.1-27.0 27.1-29,0 high 29.1-31,0 31,1-very high in the 32,0 > the 32.0 1000 seed weight (g) very small < 100.0 100,0 – 140,9 141,0 – 181,0 – small 180,9 221,0 261,0 220,9 medium-300,9 large-301,0 260,9 – 341,0 – 370,0 very large 340,9 > 370.0 2.4. White Lupin, blue Lupin and yellow lupin, varieties of quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the protein content in seeds% very low < 32,1 32.0-34.0-36.0 36,1 34,1 low – medium – 40.0 40,1 38.0 38.1-42,0 high 42,1-44,0 44.1, 48.0 very high > 48.0 1000 seed weight (g) white Lupin very small – small 200.0 201,0 250,9 < 251,0-300,9 301,0-350,9 medium 3 -400,9 401,0-450,9 51,0 large 451,0-500,9 501,0-very large 550,0 > 550.0 blue Lupin very small < 100 100.0 – small – 140,9 141,0 120,9 121,0 – 160,9 – 181,0 – the medium 161,0 180,9 200,9 201,0 221,0 220,9-large-very large 240,0 > 240.0 yellow lupin very small < 80.0 80.0 – small – 101,0 120,9 100,9 121,0 140,9 141,0 – 160,9 – medium – large 181,0-161,0 180,9 200,9 201,0-220,0 very large > 220.0 2.5. assessment of the Grasses at the 9 ball scale scores Ballroom very low 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb, plants totally dead low, around 25% of the pārziemojuš plant, pārziemojuš average around 50% of plant high, around 75% of plant pārziemojuš very high pārziemojuš, all the plants dry matter yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crude protein content in dry matter,% very low < 4.0 4,0-6,0-8,0 8.1 6.1 low – medium – 12.0 12.1 10.1 10.0-15.0 15.1 – 18,1 18,0 is high – very high 20.0 > 20.0 2.6. Legumes rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom very low 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb, plants totally dead low, around 25% of the pārziemojuš plant, pārziemojuš average around 50% of plant high, around 75% of plant pārziemojuš very high, pārziemojuš all the plants dry matter yield ,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crude protein content in dry matter,% very low low 10.0 10,0 0 30.0 2.7. Oil rutk, white mustard, California Bluebell, summer 1914, white Lupin, blue Lupin, yellow lupin and oat varieties rated at 9 ball scale scores 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 dry matter yield of Ballroom,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crude protein content in dry matter,% oil rutk very low < 8.0 8.0-9.0-9.1 11.0 11.1 low – medium – 15.0 15.1 13.1 13.0-17.1 18.9 19.0 17.0 high – very high – 20,0 > 20.0 white mustard very low < 9.0 9.0-10.0-11.0 11.1 10.1-low 13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1-medium-high 15.1 15.0 16.0 16.1 – 18.0 – very high > 18.0 California Bluebell to very low low 5.0 5.0-7,0 < 7.1-8.1 8.0-10.0 medium 10.1-11.1 11.0-13.0 13.1 14.0 14.1 – high – very high > 15.0 15,0 oats very low < 2.5 2,6-3,6-4,5 4.6 3.5 low – medium – 6.5 6.6 5.5 5.6-7.6-8.5 8.6 7.5 high – very high 9.5 > 9.5 resistance to veldr in very low low medium high very high crude protein content in dry matter,% * oil rutk very low < 1.28 1.28-1.44 1.45-1.76 1.77-low 2.08 medium-2,41-2.40 2.72 2,09 high 2.73-3.04 3.05-3.20 very high > 3.20 white mustard very low < 1.44 1,44-1,60-1,61 1.76 1.77 low – medium – 2.24 2.25 2,09 2.08 – 2,40 eur 2,56 eur 2,57-2,41-high to very high 85.00 > 2.88 California Bluebell for very low-low 1.12 0.81 < 0.80-1.29 1.28 1.13 – 1,60-1,61 1.76 1.77 to medium – high – 2.24 2.25 2,09 2.08 – 2,40 ¶ very high > 2.40 3. Oil and fibre plants, the assessment scores and ball scale 3.1. Winter and summer of Swede rape and turnip rape crop, harvest and the factors that make up quality rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ziemcietīb very poor poor average good very good seed yield,% (compared with the standard) * very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil yield ,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 3.2. varieties of flax yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom straw yield,% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 plant length, cm < 70 70 72 73-76-75-78 79-81 82-84 85-87 88-90 > 90 cm of length, Hand < 60 60-64, 65-69-68-76-72 73 77 80 81-84 85-88 > 88 bast content% < 20 20-22 23-24 25-26 27-28-29 30 31 32 33 – 34 – > 35 3.3 oil flax varieties yield and quality turbot pointer rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom seed, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9% (in comparison with standard) * very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil yield,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil content,% < 38.0 38.0 – – – 40.9 40.0 39.9 38,9 39,0 41.0 43.0 41.9 42,0-42,9 – – – 45,0 43,9 44,0 > 45.0 3.4. varieties of hemp grown for fibre yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 the stem yield Ballroom ,% (compared with the standard) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > fibre content, 135% < 30 30-32-34-36 33 35 37 38 39 40 41-42 43-44-> 45 cm in length, Plant < 200 200-230 231-260 261-290 291-310 311-340 341-370 371-400 > 400 3.5. cannabis varieties of oil yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom seed, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9% (in comparison with standard) * very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 oil yield,% (compared with the standard) very low-low 66 66 75 < 76-85 86-95 96-105 – 106 average 115 au gst 126-116-125 135 very high oil content, 135 >% < 38.0 38.0 – – – 40.9 40.0 39.9 38,9 39,0 41.0 43.0 41.9 42,0-42,9 – – – 45,0 43,9 44,0 > 45.0 4. potato varieties evaluation scores and ball scale 4.1. potato yield and quality score rating after 9 ball scale scores Ballroom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 item tuber yield of 45% compared to standartšķirn days after sadīgšan (scored early varieties) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > tuber yield of goods 135% compared to standartšķirn in 55 days after sadīgšan (scored early varieties) very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 crop vegetation s at the end of the period compared to standartšķirn ** very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > tuber yield of goods 135% compared to standartšķirn very low < 66 66-75 76-85 of the 86 low-95 96-105 106 moderate-high 116 115-125 126-135 very high > 135 tubers starch content,% (weighted average and vēlīnaj varieties) < 10.0 10,0-12.0 12.1-14.1-15.1 15.0 14.0-18.0 17.0 19.1 19.0 18.1 17.1 – – – 20.0 > 20.0 stem stem rot resistance, infection rate,%, the third time the 81-100 records 66-80 51-65 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 stem resistance to early blight, 66-80% 81-100 51-65 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 dry rot , infected tubers,% 61-70 51 70-> 60 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 wet rot infected tubers,% 61-70 51 70-> 60 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 stem rot, infected tubers,% 61-70 51 70-> 60 31-40 41-50-30-20 21 11 1 10 0 comments. The indicators are taken into account in assessing the suitability of the variety only in organic farming. * Assessing the variety, the number of double-a ball. "
Prime Minister Māris kučinskis farming Minister, traffic Minister Uldis Augul States