Provisions of the Ministry of transport no. 3 of 2004 in Riga on January 23 port State control procedures issued pursuant to the maritime administration and the Maritime Security Act article 15 the third paragraph and article 17 first part i. General questions 1. These rules shall be determined by the port State control procedures that are performed to prevent international substandard shipping in and to increase the compliance of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) The European Union and the Republic of Latvia law requirements relating to maritime safety, marine environmental protection and the seafarers ' living and working conditions, as well as port State control inspectors issuing certificates. 2. the meaning of these provisions: 2.1. conventions are referred to the Convention in the field of maritime safety, amendments to this Convention, protocols and codes: 2.1.1. the 1966 International Convention on load lines mark and its 1988 Protocol (hereinafter referred to as LL 66 Convention); 2.1.2. the 1974 International Convention for the safety of life at sea (SOLAS Convention) and its Protocol of 1988; 2.1.3. the 1973 International Convention for the prevention of pollution from ships and its Protocol of 1978 (MARPOL Convention); 2.1.4. the 1978 International Convention on standards of training, certification and Watchkeeping for seafarers and watchkeeping, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the STCW Convention); 2.1.5. the 1972 Convention on the international regulations for prevention of collisions (hereinafter referred to as the COLREG Convention); 2.1.6. the 1969 International Convention on tonnage measurement of ships (tonnage Convention); 2.1.7. The International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention, 1976 No. 147 on minimum standards in merchant ships (hereinafter ILO Convention 147); 2.1.8. The ILO Convention of 1976 on the minimum standards of commercial vessels of the 1996 Protocol (hereinafter referred to as the SD Pro 96); 2.1.9. the 1992 International Convention on civil liability for oil pollution damage (CLC Convention hereinafter); 2.2. The Paris Memorandum, is the Paris Memorandum of understanding on port State control, signed on 26 January 1982 in Paris (Paris); 2.3. the ship means a vessel to which one or more of the following provisions of that Convention and which sail under foreign flags; 2.4. marine equipment is fixed or floating platform operating in Latvian continental shelf or above; 2.5. the Latvian maritime administration maritime safety inspection officer (hereinafter Inspector OVK) is a non-profit organization of State joint stock company "Latvian maritime administration" (hereinafter referred to as the Latvian maritime administration) authorised officer inspection of port State control, which works according to the maritime administration and the Maritime Security Act laid down in article 17; 2.6. the inspection is the examination of the ship with the aim of verifying the vessel certificates and other applicable documents for validity and on the ship, its equipment and crew, as well as the State of the crew's living and working conditions; 2.7. a detailed inspection is an inspection, during which the ship, its equipment and crew as a whole or individual parts thereof in accordance with this rule 17 is subject to detailed inspection for the ship's construction, equipment, crew living and working conditions, as well as their compliance with the operational rules; 2.8. detention is the prohibition of a ship to proceed to sea at the time of the inspection, that the deficiencies found, separately or as a whole, suggests that the ship has lost its seaworthiness; 2.9. the suspension of the operation is the prohibition of a ship to continue an operation of the vessel at the time of the inspection, that the deficiencies found, separately or as a whole, makes the subsequent conduct of the operations of the vessel to be dangerous; 2.10. the priority factor (target factor) is calculated by the methodology of the Paris Memorandum number that describes the need to check. Priority factor for each ship is specified in the SIReNAC database and is used in selecting vessels for port State control inspections. Higher priority factor points to a greater need to make a check of the ship; 2.11. The SIReNAC database is created in the Paris Memorandum database inserts information about all vessels OVK inspections Paris Memorandum ports of Member States. The database is maintained and run by the French Transport Ministry's information systems Department (Department of the ds Systems (DSI) d? Information of the Direction Générale des Affaires Maritimes et des Gen de Mer (DAMGM)).
II. Application of provisions 3. requirements of this Regulation apply to the Latvian marine administration, conducting inspections on foreign ships and their crew for visiting Latvia Latvian ports or waters under the jurisdiction of marine equipment installed or which is anchored in the vicinity of such port or at such facilities. 4. the requirements of this regulation for the implementation of the Convention also apply to vessels with a gross tonnage (GT) does not exceed 500. If the Convention does not include requirements for such vessels, the vessel shall apply such requirements, which ensure that the vessel concerned is not dangerous to human health, safety or the environment. For the purposes of this paragraph, the Paris Memorandum in annex 1. "port State control procedures". 5. the examination of a State which is not bound by any of the conventions referred to in these provisions, the flag ship, attachment to the ship and its crew could not be more favourable than that of the State to which this Convention applies, the flag ship. 6. the requirements of this Regulation shall not apply to fishing vessels, warships, naval auxiliary vessels, primitive wooden ships, public service vessels used for non-commercial purposes, as well as recreational vessels which are not engaged in commercial activities.
III. organisation of the inspection 7. Port State control provides inspectors the OVK vessel inspections and other necessary measures for the implementation of port State control, in accordance with the requirements of this regulation. 8. the marine administration OVK Inspector in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 51 issued this provision in annex 16. Forms of port State control inspector certificate (further – the certificate). 9. the period of validity of the certificate is five years. 10. the Latvian maritime administration shall make these rules 11 and 12 and the vessel referred to in chapter V of the extent of inspections corresponding to at least 25% of the average total number of ships that enter the ports of Latvia in one calendar year, the calculations shall be carried out on the previous three calendar years for which statistics are available. 11. the Latvian maritime administration in accordance with the provisions of Chapter VI, take the ship inspection, which is not subject to an expanded inspection, if the priority factor according to the SIReNAC information system exceeds 50 and if since the last inspection of the ship, which carried out the Paris Memorandum ports in the region, has passed at least one month. 12. the Inspector OVK vessel inspections carried out in the following priority order: 12.1. first, inspect vessels which comply with the provisions of paragraph 1 of annex 1 of the said criteria, regardless of the priority factor; 12.2. in the second place, the inspection of ships which comply with the provisions of annex 1 2 and 3 of the criteria referred to in paragraph 1. These ships choose inspectorates depending on the size of the priority factor the SIReNAC information system. 13. The Latvian maritime administration does not carry out the inspection of ships that are inspected in one of the Member States of the European Union during the last six months, provided that: 13.1 the ship does not conform to this provision of the annex referred to in paragraph 1; 13.2. following a previous inspection of the ship has not received news about the shortcomings of the vessel; 13.3. no clear reasons to perform the inspection; 13.4. a vessel not to apply this provision in paragraph 11. 14. in paragraph 13 of these rules shall not apply to the requirements for the operation of the vessel, specifically designed for the conventions referred to in these provisions.
IV. Inspection arrangements at the time of the inspection the OVK 15. the inspector shall as a minimum: 15.1 certificate of inspection and the other documents listed in annex 2 of these provisions and refers to a specific ship; 15.2. the General position of the vessel's compliance with the General safety requirement, including the engine room, living and service facilities, as well as the vessel premises under hygienic conditions. 16. the OVK inspector may examine documents that are not listed in annex 2 of these regulations, if they are in accordance with the following provisions of those conventions requirements must be on this Board. 17. a detailed inspection of the ship, including the inspection of compliance with the requirements for the conduct of the operations of the vessel, the inspector shall, if after the OVK this provision in point 15 and 16 in inspections are clear grounds to believe that the ship, its equipment or crew differs significantly from the relevant conventions and other international laws and requirements. "Clear basis" means that the Inspector has found the OVK evidence which, according to his professional judgment is the basis for detailed ship, its equipment or its crew. "Clear grounds" examples in annex 3 of these rules. 18. Ship Inspection carried out in accordance with the procedures specified in annex 4 of these rules of international laws listed.
V. determine the category of mandatory expanded inspection of vessels in the

19. A ship that meets this provision 5. laid down in chapter I of the annex categories of vessels subject to inspection for the extended 12 months since the last expanded inspection carried out in one of the countries that are signatories to the Paris Memorandum ports. 20. If a vessel chosen to carry out the inspection in accordance with paragraph 12 of these regulations, the inspector shall board the OVK extended inspection. Following the inspection of the vessel in accordance with chapter IV of these regulations may also be carried out during the period between two expanded inspections. 21. If a vessel to which the provisions of paragraph 19, plans to enter the Latvian port in the 12 months since the last expanded inspection of the vessel, its master or operator shall provide the maritime administration of Latvia all messages listed in this provision in chapter II of annex 5. The following information provides at least 3 days before the expected time of arrival at any port of Latvia or before leaving the previous port if the voyage is expected to be shorter. 22. the expanded inspection shall be carried out compulsorily, if the ship is not complied with the rule mentioned in paragraph 21. 23. If a vessel subject to these regulations 19, 20 and 21 of the type referred to in paragraph 1 and the priority factor is 7 or higher, and if since the last expanded inspection in the last 12 months, the first time the ship enters in one of the ports of Latvia conducted an expanded inspection. 24. Extended inspection arrangements laid down in this provision 5. Chapter III of the annex.
Vi. Action in cases where certain vessels have not been able to test 25. If the operational reasons, the maritime administration of Latvia can not ship inspection with a priority factor greater than 50 in accordance with the provisions of ņā 11, or a mandatory expanded inspection in accordance with paragraph 23 of these rules, then that this type of inspection, the Latvian maritime administration shall immediately inform the SIReNAC informācijassistēm. 26. in these regulations referred to in paragraph 25, where the operational reasons, some ships have not been tested, the Latvian maritime administration shall inform the Commission every six months, indicating the reasons why the vessels were not inspected. 27. the number of the calendar year concerned does not exceed 5% of the inspected, the boundaries of the average annual number of vessels that joined the Latvian ports and subject to inspection in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 25. Calculations on the basis of the last three years for which statistics are available. 28. the ships to which reference is made in paragraph 25 of these rules, which are to be inspected in ports of Latvia in accordance with paragraph 11 of these regulations or that mandatory expanded inspection to be carried out in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 23, the next port of entry into the European Union.
VII. Refusal of access to ports for specific vessels 29. Latvian maritime administration shall ensure that the vessel meets one of the following provisions of annex 1 of 11 categories listed in the prohibited entry into Latvian ports, except in the case referred to in paragraph 47 of these regulations, if the ship: 29.1. flying the State appearing in the black list as published in the annual report of the Paris Memorandum, flag and detained more than twice in the course of the preceding 24 months in a signatory of the Paris Memorandum ports; 29.2. the ship with the country, which Paris Memorandum published in the annual report of the black list described as "very high risk" or "high risk" country, flag and detained more than once during the previous 36 months of a State signatory of the Paris Memorandum ports. Refusal to enter into force immediately, that is, immediately after the ship has been authorised to leave the port where it was put on hold in the second or third time.
VIII. Report of the vessel for inspection results 30. upon completion of the inspection, a detailed inspection or an expanded inspection, the inspector shall draw up a report of OVK in accordance with the provisions of Annex 9. The report shall be submitted to the vessel. A copy of the report shall be handed to the Latvian maritime administration maritime safety inspections (KD) coordinating control of ships, which checks the data in the SIReNAC system and KD in the database. A copy of the message stored in the KD. 31. If there are deficiencies that threaten human health, safety, other ship or the environment, OVK Inspector external procedure laid down by law, regulation, or suspending the delay in ship operations that produce these threats. Decision on the ship is detained, or the operation of the ship provided the suspension, the port captain. To hold a ship inspector OVK: 31.1. completed in the Paris Memorandum on ship inspection report form "A" and "B" forms, which specify information in accordance with the provisions of Annex 9; 31.2. complete the "Statement on the detention of the captain of the ship" in accordance with the provisions of annex 13, adds the completed this provision specified in paragraph 19.3. "A" and "B" form and submit notice attachable to the captain of the vessel, but a duplicate-the captain of the port. 32. where these rules 11 and 12 and paragraph in chapter V of the inspections resulted in the ship being detained by Latvian maritime administration shall immediately inform in writing the State whose flag the ship is entitled to fly, the competent institution of any circumstances, which require the intervention of the competent institution. The notification form specified in annex 14 to this regulation. If necessary, the Latvian maritime administration shall send the notification referred to in this state the nearest diplomatic representative and to the classification society or other authorized organization that issued the certificate of the vessel. 33. when all deficiencies during an inspection of the hold of the ship, the master of the vessel shall inform the maritime administration of Latvia who on the Board sends the OVK inspectors checking again. If the Inspector finds that the OVK ship can go to sea or ship can resume operations without compromising human health, the safety of other vessels, as well as the environment, he shall take a decision on the detention of the ship or the lifting of the suspension of operations, completing the "statement on the release of the vessel" in accordance with the provisions of annex 15 submitted by the master of the ship, but a copy of the notice sent to the captain of the port, the ship's flag State administration and the classification society which issued the certificates of the ship. 34. The decision on the detention of the vessel, the inspector shall apply the OVK rule 6. criteria referred to in the annex. 35. the ship is detained, if it does not have a flight data recorder or it is not in working order when its use is compulsory in accordance with the provisions of annex 12. If this deficiency cannot be eliminated immediately port of detention, the Inspector may allow the OVK ship to proceed to the nearest appropriate port for lack of prevention. Disadvantages preventing no longer than 30 days. To this end, the use of this provision in paragraph 42. 36. where the overall condition of a ship does not comply with the requirements of these regulations, the Inspector may defer the OVK following inspection of the vessel until the person responsible for the ship has taken the necessary measures to ensure the conformity of ships Convention requirements. 37. the port State control of vessels must not be unduly detained or delayed. If a ship is unduly detained or delayed, the owner or operator of the ship is the right external regulatory provision in compensation for losses associated with such delay or detention. The fact that the ship is detained, or the delay has been unreasonable, proves the owner or operator. 38. the Latvian maritime administration detention decision or prohibit the entry into another port owner or operator of the vessel, or his representative may bring an action in court. Such proceedings are not the basis for detention of the ship to stop. Latvian maritime administration shall inform the master of the vessel on the right to submit such a request. 39. the inspector shall detain the OVK ship, if the ship inspection Inspector OVK time reveals that the vessel, which the territory of the Member States of the European Union in the international management code for the safe (hereinafter ISM Code), no copy of the document of compliance of the company or the safe management certificate issued in accordance with the ISM Code. 40. Despite the fact that the ship is not the rules of the document referred to in paragraph 39, the Inspector may cancel detention OVK's decision to prevent the Latvian port congestion, if at the time of the inspection discloses any other deficiencies that justify the detention. Such a decision, the Latvian maritime administration shall immediately inform the Member States of the European Union, the competent institution. 41. The Latvian maritime administration take measures to ships going to sea in accordance with the provisions referred to in paragraph 40 of the circumstances, would ban entry of any Latvian or port of the European Union, with the exception of this rule 47. as provided in paragraph 1, until the owner or operator has not provided evidence of the Latvian maritime administration that the ship under the ISM Code has been issued the certificates in question. In cases where this provision is openly referred to in paragraph 32 deficiencies and cannot be rectified in the port of detention, these rules shall also apply the relevant provisions of chapter IX.
IX. Events after the inspection and detention

42. If the identified deficiencies cannot be eliminated in the port of inspection, the Inspector may authorize the OVK vessel to go to the closest ship repair yard. This factory is chosen by the master of the vessel and of the inspection bodies involved in provided that they comply with the rules defined by the competent institution of the flag State and agreed to a Latvian maritime administration. These rules ensure that the vessels sailing does not endanger passengers and crew members ' safety and health and other ships as well as unduly threaten the marine environment. 43. Ship repair and on the hiking conditions Latvian maritime administration shall notify the State in which the ship-repair factory, the competent institution, as well as the rules referred to in paragraph 33 of the institutions and any other body that is associated with the in accordance with Annex 2 to the Paris Memorandum.
44. The Latvian maritime administration shall make arrangements for the provision referred to in paragraph 42 ships refused access to any port within the European Union, until the owner or operator has not provided for the Latvian marine administration, sufficient evidence of the ship's full compliance with the Convention referred to in these provisions if they sail: 44.1. without complying with the conditions that the external regulatory provision adopted in Latvian maritime administration; 44.2. refusing to comply with the relevant requirements of the Convention and without calling the specified repair factory. 45. in the circumstances referred to in point, Latvia 44.1 maritime administration immediately warned all other European Union Member States competent authorities. To make a decision on the prohibition to enter the port, the maritime administration of Latvia shall consult the administration of the flag State of the vessel. 46. The Latvian marine administration, you receive information about the ship going to one of the Latvian ship repair plants, inform the applicant of the information on the action. 47. when a vessel the subject of a prohibition to enter the ports of the European Union in accordance with the provisions of Chapter VII, but the owner, the operator or the master of the vessel has taken the appropriate measures for the safe entering specific port, the maritime administration of Latvia in exceptional cases can make the ship permission to enter the port, if the following conditions occur: 29.3. cases of force majeure; 47.2. Security considerations; 47.3. in order to reduce the risk of pollution; 47.4. to fix the time of the inspection revealed deficiencies.
X. Professional requirements OVK inspectors carried out Inspections 48. inspectors OVK whose qualifications meet the rules referred to in annex 7. 49. If the maritime administration of Latvia can not provide adequate Inspector in the OVK professional competence, OVK Inspector helps any person with relevant expertise. 50. the OVK officer and the person who helps you, it may not be a commercial interest not to carry out inspections in port, nor to the skipper of the vessel. OVK inspectors should not receive compensation or for classification societies, which issued the regulations set out in the certificate of the vessel or craft class certificates or which carry out the necessary checks to issue those certificates to ships. 51. the Latvian maritime administration after the conclusion of the contract of work with the inspector shall issue a certificate of OVK in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 8 shall, upon request and indicating that the OVK Inspector is authorized to carry out inspections.
XI. Information and cooperation 52. If the pilots involved in the mooring of vessels, or attauvošan, in the performance of their duties, work on board ships bound for a port of Latvia, and observed on these vessels, which endangers or could endanger the safety of the vessel and crew and may cause damage to the marine environment, on the deficiencies that they immediately inform the maritime administration of Latvia. 53. If the State or the port authority officers, in the performance of his duties, establishes that the ship in the port has deficiencies which may affect the safety of the vessel and crew and may cause damage to the marine environment, that person shall immediately inform the maritime administration of Latvia. 54. the maritime administration shall organise cooperation with all competent authorities and companies to get all port State control effectively requires information about the ships that enter the ports of Latvia. 55. The Latvian maritime administration shall make arrangements for the exchange of information and cooperation with other competent authorities, as well as maintain contacts with relevant European Union institutions and the SIReNAC information system set up in the Senmal (France). To carry out the inspections referred to in this provision in paragraph 11 and 12 and in chapter V, OVK inspectors use public and private databases relating to ship inspection accessible and the Equasis information system. 56. The Latvian maritime administration not less frequently than once a month, the Latvian maritime administration internet site URwww.juras-administracija.lv publishes these rules of Annex 8 lists information on vessels last month detained a Latvian ports, or which are subject to refusal of access.
XII. Compensation for the maritime administration of Latvia 57. If this provision is referred to in chapters IV and V of the inspection time confirmed or deficiencies as a result of a breach of any of the requirements of the Convention and which justify the detention of the ship, then all external laws, statutory inspection costs associated with specific pay period shall be borne by the owner, operator or his representative in Latvia. 58. all external laws, statutory costs relating to inspections carried out by the Latvian maritime administration pursuant to this paragraph, Regulation 44 shall be borne by the owner or operator. 59. If the ship is detained at the time of the inspection the shortcomings detected, or because it has no valid certificates, all external regulatory costs imposed by legislation relating to the detention in port shall be borne by the ship owner or operator. 60. The decision on the detention of the ship not be lifted unless external regulatory provision defined in full for ship inspection or not enough insurance to cover the costs.
XIII. final question 61. Be declared unenforceable in the Ministry of transport of 21 May 1999, Regulation No 15 "port State control".
XIV. Informative reference to European Union directives, the regulations include provisions arising from directives 95/21/EC and 2001/106/EC.
Traffic Minister r. ZīleJūrniecīb Department Director a. "Journal of Krastiņš version received 23.04.2004. Annex 1: criteria for the selection of ships for inspection 1. Regardless of the priority factor values absolute priority be given to the following: vessel inspection 1.1. ships which have been reported by pilots or port authorities as having deficiencies which may prejudice their safe navigation (pursuant to 13 September 1993 the European Council Directive 93/75/EEC concerning minimum requirements" for ships going to and from Community ports, leading to the atsāj dangerous or environment contaminated products "and that rule 52 and 53); 1.2. ships which do not comply with the 13 September 1993 Council Directive 93/75/EEC "concerning minimum requirements for vessels bound for or leaving Community ports and carrying dangerous or environment contaminated products"; 1.3. ships which have been the subject of EU Member States of a report or notification; 1.4. ships which have received reports or complaints from the master, crew or any other person or organisation; the identity of the person submitting the notification or complaint must not be revealed to the master or the shipowner of the ship concerned; 1.5. for ships which: 1.5.1. road to the port suffered in a collision, grounding grounding or thrown ashore;

1.5.2. is accused of, that breach rules on disposal of harmful substances, including oil and oil products or waste water; 1.5.3. made an uncontrolled or dangerous manoeuvres that have not complied with the IMO measures adopted for vessel traffic rules or safe sea practice and procedures; 1.5.4. carried out other operations that pose people, property or the environment; 1.6. ships for which in the previous six months for security reasons has been suspended or withdrawn from the vessel's class. 2. Deciding on the order in which to inspect vessels not covered by this annex to the requirements of paragraph 1, the Latvian maritime administration shall take into account the overall priorities of the factors specified in the SIReNAC information system under the Paris Memorandum, paragraph 1 of annex 1. Higher priority factor indicate higher priority. Priority factor is the sum of the applicable priority factor values as defined in the Paris Memorandum. 3.5. Of this annex, 3.6 and 3.7 shall apply only to those inspections made in the past 12 months. The overall priority factor shall not be less than the sum of the values, as defined for this annex 3.3, 3.4, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11. This provision, however, for the purposes of paragraph 23 to the General priorities for factors not taken into account in this annex, 3.10. 3. the priority factor is calculated using the following criteria: 3.1 the ship pulls into port in Latvia for the first time it entered a 12 months or more. Applying these criteria, also take account of the checks carried out by Member States of the Paris Memorandum. If the data required for this purpose are not available, then use the SIReNAC data and examine the vessels that are not registered in the SIReNAC database since its establishment on January 1, 1993; 3.2. in the last six months has not verified any of the European Union or a Member State of the Paris Memorandum; 3.3. the vessel with a compulsory licence on the ship's construction and equipment, in accordance with the requirements of the Convention and classification certificates issued by classification societies, which the maritime administration of Latvia is not authorised and which do not conform to 22 November 1994, the European Council Directive 94/57/EC ' on common rules and standards for ship inspection and supervisory bodies and the administration of the sea "; 3.4. the flag State of the ship is mentioned in the annual report of the Paris Memorandum of detained vessels as a country where the number of ships detained in relation to the number of the vessels inspected a year earlier than the average within the Paris Memorandum of detained ships in relation to the number of the vessels inspected in the past three years; 3.5. the vessel has been authorised to leave the port of a Member State of the EU under the following conditions: 3.5.1. inspection time deficiencies to be rectified before departure; 3.5.2. the time of the inspection found deficiencies to be rectified at the next port of entry; 3.5.3. the time of the inspection found deficiencies to be rectified within 14 days; 3.5.4. the shortcomings found during the inspection, which is intended to prevent other conditions. If the ship has been taken and all deficiencies found during the inspection have been rectified, the calculation of the priority factors, it is taken into account. 3.6. ship which discovered flaws in a previous inspection, according to the number of deficiencies; 3.7. a vessel which has been detained in a previous port; 3.8 a vessel flying the flag of a country which has not ratified the international conventions referred to in paragraph 2.1 of these terms; 3.9. the vessel with a certificate of classification issued by the classification society with a deficiency ratio above average; 3.10. a ship which complies with the provisions of chapter I of annex 5 the requirements for expanded inspection; 3.11. the ship is older than 13 years; 3.12. ships which do not comply with the reporting requirements for the transport of dangerous goods in Latvian waters. The order in which vessels shall report dangerous goods, certain Cabinet on 25 April 2000 by Regulation No 156 "rules on the reporting of hazardous and polluting cargoes".
The maritime Department Director a. Card Krastiņš annex 2 lists and other documents, within the time of the inspection the OVK OVK Inspector checks the following certificates and documents: 1. International tonnage certificate issued in accordance with the capacity of the Convention; 2. Passenger ship safety certificate; 3. the cargo ship safety construction certificate; 4. Cargo ship safety equipment certificate; 5. Cargo ship safety radio certificate; 6. Exclusive licence; 7. a cargo ship safety certificate; 8. International certificate of fitness for transporting liquefied petroleum gas; 9. A certificate of fitness to carry liquefied petroleum gas; 10. International certificate of fitness for the carry dangerous chemical liquid; 11. A certificate of fitness to carry dangerous chemical liquid; 12. International oil pollution prevention certificate; 13. International pollution prevention certificate for the carriage of noxious liquid, in tanks; 14. International load line certificate; 15. International signs exclusive licence; 16. the oil record book part I and II; 17. cargo record books; 18. The licence for minimum safe crew;
19. qualifications of crew members of the ship's documents in accordance with the requirements of the STCW Convention; 20. The ship's crew medical certificates pursuant to ILO Convention No. 73 "On the medical examinations of seafarers ' claims; 21. the Persistence of information; 22. The company's copy of the document of compliance or the safe management certificate issued in accordance with the ISM Code (chapter IX of the SOLAS Convention); 23. A licence in respect of the ship's hull strength (strength) and mechanisms issued by the classification society in question. This documents the Inspector checks only if the vessel retains the classification societies specified ship class; 24. the document of compliance with the special requirements for ships carrying dangerous goods; 25. "high-speed vessel safety certificate and permit to operate high speed craft; 26. Dangerous goods special list or manifest (manifest), or detailed load plan; 27. with regard to the log records of training and drill, and journal with the records of rescue and equipment inspection and maintenance; 28. special purpose ship safety certificate; 29. Mobile offshore drilling platform security certificate; 30. Oil tankers-the record of oil discharge monitoring and control system for the last ballast voyage;
31. Alarm lists, fire control plan, and for passenger ships, the ship's damage control plan; 32. the emergency plans of action in the cases of the ship leaking oil or its products; 33. Reports on surveys (bulk carriers and oil tankers); 34. Reports on previously carried out inspection of port State control; 35. Ro-ro passenger ships, information on the A/A maximum; 36. document of authorization for the carriage of grain; 37. Cargo Securing Manual; 38. the waste management plans and waste journal; 39. Aid system for making decisions on masters of passenger ships; 40. Search and rescue cooperation plan for passenger ships trading on fixed routes; 41. the list of operating restrictions on passenger vessels; 42. Bulk Carriers (bulk carrier); 43. Bulk carriers for loading or unloading plan; 44. A certificate of insurance or any other financial security in respect of civil liability for oil pollution damage under the CLC Convention; 45. Table concerning the organisation of working time on Board (ILO Convention No 180 and the STCW Convention); 46. the seafarers ' hours of work and rest in the registration book according to ILO Convention No 180 "On the medical examinations of seafarers".
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš annex 3 examples of "clear grounds", which points to the need to carry out a detailed inspection

1. the vessels referred to in that rule 1 of the annex, section 3.3, 3.4, 3.5.2, 3.5.3 and 3.8 above. 2. Not properly filled in the oil record book. 3. Examination of the certificates and other documents in accordance with the provisions of section 15.1 and 16, discovered inaccuracies. 4. There are indications that the crew members did not conform to the requirements set by the European Council of 22 November 1994, Directive 94/58/EC "on the minimum level of training of seafarers" article 8, as well as the Ministry of transport of the Republic of Latvia, 2003 august 25 Regulation No 19 ", the Latvian seafarers certification and Watchkeeping provisions", September 3, 2003 regulations No 23 "Latvian fishing vessel personnel training and certification", and September 3, 2003, the provisions of no. 24 "inland waters ship staff training and certification". 5. Of cargo and other operations not being conducted safely, or in accordance with IMO guidelines, e.g. the content of oxygen in the inert-gas main supply to the cargo tanks exceeds the maximum permissible level. 6. failure of the master on an oil tanker to produce the record of the oil discharge monitoring and control system for the last ballast voyage. 7. absence of crew duties (alarm) list, or crew members not aware of their responsibilities in the event of fire or an order to abandon the ship. 8. False distress alerts not followed by proper cancellation procedures. 9. the Board is not in equipment or conventions are not performed for procedures. 10. The unsanitary conditions. 11. the Inspector's general impression and observations that serious hull and other wear or other defects that could compromise the tightness of the ship's structure and integrity. 12. Information or evidence that the master or crew is not familiar with essential shipboard operations relating to the safety of the ship or the prevention of pollution of the environment, or the operation of the ship have been made. 13. The ship is not on the organisation of working time of seafarers and working and rest hours of registration books.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš annex 4 ship inspection procedures 1. Annex I to the Paris memorandum "port State control procedures". 2. international transport of dangerous goods, the provisions of the code. 3. the ILO publication "inspection of labour conditions on board ship: recommendations for the duration of the test." 4. The team's principles of safe manning (IMO resolution a. in 890 (21) and its attachments: safe manning "minimum requirements" (annex 1) and "guidelines for the safe manning of command principles" (annex 2).
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš annex 5 mandatory expanded inspection Ship of the class, to which the extended inspection 1. Gas and chemical tankers older than 10 years of the date of construction indicated in the ship's safety certificates. 2. Bulk Carriers older than 12 years of the date of construction indicated in the ship's safety certificates. 3. Oil tankers with a capacity greater than 3, 000B and older than 15 years of the date of construction indicated in the ship's safety certificates. 4. passenger ships older than 15 years, except passenger ships, referred to the European Council on 29 April 1999, Directive 1999/35/EC "on a system of mandatory surveys for the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on regular traffic safe for use" in article 2 (a) and (b) above.
II. Information provided by the Latvian maritime administration vessel or operator in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 21 of the terms of the Latvian maritime administration provides the following information: 1. name of the ship; 2. the flag; 3. Imo identification number, if any; 4. dead-weight tonnage; 5. the date of construction of the ship, the date indicated in the ship's safety certificates; 6. the tanker: 6.1. Configuration: single hull, single hull with SBT, insulated double-hulled; 6.2. the cargo and ballast tanks: full, empty position, inert; 6.3. the scope and nature of the cargo;
7. estimated time of arrival in the port or pilot station, as required by the maritime administration of Latvia; 8. the planned parking duration; 9. planned activities at the port (loading, unloading, other); 10. the planned statutory survey inspections and substantial maintenance and repair work to be carried out, staying in port.
III. Inspection procedures for certain categories of ships expanded inspection 1. Expanded inspection program shall include at least the following matters, taking into account the practical possibility of checks or restrictions with regard to human, the safety of the ship or the port: 1.1. categories in accordance with chapter I of this annex ships: 1.1.1. power supply and actuation of the emergency generator; 1.1.2. emergency lighting checks; 1.1.3. the emergency fire pump performance, adding the main motorway of two fire hoses; 1.1.4. picture pump operation; 1.1.5. watertight door closing; 1.1.6. lifeboat lowering water; 1.1.7. the system, such as a boiler, ventilation, fuel pump, emergency stop remote checks; 1.1.8. steering equipment trials, including emergency steering equipment; 1.1.9. radio equipment of emergency power supply of the inspection; 1.1.10. oil-water separator and, if possible, the pilot; 1.2. gas and chemical tankers in addition to subparagraph 1.1 of this chapter also listed in the following items: 1.2.1. cargo tank monitoring and safety devices relating to temperature, pressure and volume of unredeemed; 1.2.2. analysis of oxygen and explosion risk identification facilities, including their calibration. Chemical detection equipment (bellows) with the availability of sufficient number of suitable gas detection tubes for the specific cargo being carried; 1.2.3. or rescue kits for cabins provide sufficient breathing and vision protection for every person on Board (if required by the products listed on the international certificate of fitness for the carry dangerous chemical liquid or the certificate of fitness to carry dangerous chemicals in liquid or the certificate of fitness to carry liquefied petroleum gas, though that applies); 1.2.4. or the product being transported is listed in the international certificate of fitness for the transport of hazardous chemical in the liquid or the certificate of fitness to carry dangerous chemical liquid, or the certificate of fitness to carry liquefied petroleum gas, though that applies; 1.2.5 fixed firefighting equipment on deck, which, depending on the product being transported, can be like foam, dry chemical or other type; 1.3. bulk carriers in addition to the points listed in 1.1 also checks the following elements: 1.3.1. Board mechanism basis for potential corrosion; 1.3.2. manhole covers possible deformation or corrosion; 1.3.3. possible cracks or local corrosion in transverse bulkheads; 1.3.4. access to the cargo tanks; 1.3.5. the flag State or classification society approved the following documents: 1.3.5.1. reports on the ship's construction surveys; 1.3.5.2. the reports on the assessment of the situation; 1.3.5.3. the reports on the design thickness measurements; 1.3.5.4. the description of the document that set out in IMO resolution a. 744(18); 1.4. oil tankers in addition to the points listed in 1.1 also checks the following elements: 1.4.1. fixed foam fire-extinguishing systems on board; 1.4.2. the fixed fire-fighting equipment in General; 1.4.3. the inspection of fire dampers in engine room, pump room and accommodation; 1.4.4. the inert-gas pressure and oxygen content in it; 1.4.5. the ballast tanks: at least one of the ballast tanks in the cargo tank area, first from tank manhole/deck access from the site, and if there is a basis for further investigations, then entering it; 1.4.6. the flag State or classification society approved the following documents: 1.4.6.1. reports on the ship's construction surveys; 1.4.6.2. reports on the assessment of the situation; 1.4.6.3. reports on the design thickness measurements; 1.4.6.4. description document that set out in IMO resolution a. 744(18); 1.5. passenger ships, in addition to the points listed in 1.1 also checks the following elements: 1.5.1. detection and fire alarm systems; 1.5.2. fire doors closure; 1.5.3. the General emergency radiotranslācij system; 1.5.4. fire drill during which demonstrate the Firefighter's equipment sets and participate in part of the servicing of passengers; 1.5.5. the leading crew members ' knowledge of the ship's management plan. 2. in point 1 of this chapter set out the expanded inspection program, the Inspectors note that the tests that directly affect the operation of the ship, may endanger the safe execution of certain if the inspection required to perform this operation. 3. If necessary, the vessel's master or operator consent to the inspection may be continued while the ship is on a voyage from one port to another. Inspectors must not obstruct the operation of the ship, nor must they induce situations that, in the master's opinion could endanger the passengers, the crew or the safety of the ship.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš annex 6

Criteria for detention of 1. before taking a decision on the detention of the vessel inspection deficiencies discovered during the OVK Inspector applied external regulatory provision defined below 3., 4., 5 and and 6 criteria listed in. 2. If detention is due to damage incurred during the accident, which happened in the ship's voyage to a port, "the captain of the ship's detention" shall not be issued if: 2.1. duly completed requirements for SOLAS-74 I/11 (c) the rules on reporting to the flag State authority, appointed surveyor or the recognised organisation responsible for issuing the relevant certificate; 2.2. before entering port of the master or owner shall submit a detailed outline of the accident and the damage the Latvian marine administration, as well as informed of which details are provided in the administration of the flag State;
2.3. the vessel shall take appropriate remedial action, to the Latvian maritime administration discretion is sufficient; 2.4. the report on corrective action completion of receipt of the Latvian maritime administration is satisfied that the deficiencies which posed a threat to safety, health or the environment have been rectified. 3. In making a decision on detention, the inspector shall follow the OVK following key criteria: 3.1. ships which are unsafe to proceed to sea must be detained at the time of the first inspection irrespective of how long the ship will stay in port; 3.2. the ship is detained if its deficiencies are sufficiently serious to before exit to the sea again, the inspector should check that the deficiencies have been rectified. 4. the Latvian maritime administration by any means, but the best – the ship again visited, make sure that the deficiencies have been rectified before departure. 5. when deciding whether the deficiencies found are sufficiently serious to vessels detained, the inspector shall assess whether the OVK: 5.1 the ship is valid all the required documents; 5.2. the crew meet "certificate for minimum safe crew". At the time of the inspection the OVK inspector must further assess whether the ship or its crew could further voyage: 5.2.1. navigate safely; 5.2.2. secure to carry out cargo operations, carry and monitor the condition of the goods; 5.2.3. safe operation of ship mechanisms; 5.2.4. maintain proper propulsion and steering equipment; 5.2.5. where necessary, fight fires in any part of the ship; 5.2.6. If necessary, quick and safe to abandon the ship and carry out rescue operations; 5.2.7. prevent pollution of the environment; 5.2.8. maintain adequate stability; 5.2.9. maintain adequate watertight integrity; 5.2.10. the situations of danger to ensure communications; 5.2.11. provide safe and healthy conditions on board a ship; 5.2.12. to provide the maximum of information in case of accident (using flight recording hardware). 6. If the answer to any of the above in point 5 ratings is negative, then, given all the shortcomings detected, OVK Inspector seriously considering, or ship need not hold. Several minor weaknesses can also be a combination of the grounds for detention of the ship. 7. a list of Deficiencies that require detention: 7.1 General 7.1.1. shortcomings: the lack of valid certificates and other documents required by the applicable laws and regulations. However, vessels flying the flag of States that are not in the Convention (relevant legislation), or the Contracting Parties have not adopted any other legislation are not required to carry the conventions or other legal or statutory licence. So the lack of such a certificate may not be a direct reason for the detention;
7.1.2. However, the application of "equal treatment" principle, prior to exiting the Sea requires significant Board compliance with the document referred to in point 7.1.1. 7.2. Areas under the SOLAS Convention (references are given in brackets): 7.2.1. failure of the proper operation of the dzeniekārt or other relevant mechanisms, as well as electrical installations; 7.2.2. insufficiently clean the engine, face is too much oily water, pipe insulation, including the engine room exhaust pipe insulation is smeared with petroleum products, proper operation of pumping equipment of pictures; 7.2.3. failure of the proper operation of emergency generator, lighting, batteries and switches; 7.2.4. failure of the proper operation of the main and emergency steering equipment; 7.2.5. no individual life-saving resources, collective life-saving appliances and their launching equipment, rescue is not enough or they are worn; 7.2.6. no fire detection system, fire alarm, firefighting equipment, fixed fire-fighting equipment, ventilation valves, fire dampers and fuel quick closing devices, they do not meet the requirements or they are significantly worn and unable to carry out its functions; 7.2.7. on tanker cargo deck do not have the appropriate firefighting means or they are worn, or not; 7.2.8. no running lights, signālzīmj or sound signal, they do not meet the requirements or are significantly worn; 7.2.9. not of radio communication of emergencies or security purposes or its not working properly; 7.2.10. have proper navigation equipment or its not working properly, taking into account the SOLAS regulation V/12 (o); 7.2.11. do not adjust the navigation map or other navigational publications necessary for the intended voyage, taking into account that can use electronic card as a substitute for paper cards; 7.2.12. absence of non-sparking exhaust ventilation for cargo pump rooms (SOLAS regulation II-2/59.3.1); 7.2.13. serious deficiencies in the Organization of the operation, set the Paris Memorandum in section 5.5 of annex 1; 7.2.14. crew, manning or does not meet the qualifications certificate "for the safe shipping of minimum crew"; 7.2.15. are not extended survey program in accordance with SOLAS chapter XI-2.; 7.2.16. missing or not working the flight data recorder (RDR), if its use is optional. 7.3. Areas under the international bulk chemical code of (liquid) (IBC) (references are given in brackets): 7.3.1. transport of a substance not mentioned in the certificate of fitness or missing cargo information (16.2); 7.3.2. missing or damaged high-pressure safety devices (8.2.3); 7.3.3. unsafe or non-conforming code wiring (10.2.3); 7.3.4. the sources of dangerous arcing locations (11.3.15); 7.3.5. particular irregularities (15); 7.3.6. exceeded the maximum allowable cargo quantity per tank (16.1); 7.3.7. sensitive products not sufficient thermal insulation (16.6). 7.4. Areas under the international liquefied petroleum gas carrier code (IGC) (references are given in brackets): 7.4.1. transport of a substance not mentioned in the certificate of fitness of the ship to carry liquefied petroleum gas on the international certificate of fitness for the carry dangerous chemical liquid, the certificate of fitness to carry dangerous chemicals in liquid or missing cargo information (18.1); 7.4.2. no accommodations or service spaces (3.2.6) closing devices; 7.4.3. bulkhead not gastight (3.3.2); 7.4.4. defective air locks (3.6); 7.4.5. a shut-off valve is not quick or they are corrupt (5.6);
7.4.6. missing or defective safety valves (8.2); 7.4.7. unsafe or non-conforming code wiring (10.2.4); 7.4.8. ventilators in cargo area not operable (12.1); 7.4.9. is not working for cargo tanks pressure alarm (13.4.1); 7.4.10. gas detection or toxic gas detection plant defective (13.6). 7.4.11. transport of substances that need to be inhibitē (Suppress, slow), if the vessel does not have a valid certificate of inhibitēšan (17/19); 7.5. Areas under the LL 66 Convention:

7.5.1. the deck and hull plating significant areas of damage or corrosion, or plating and associated frame deformation affecting the seaworthiness of the ship or the ability to withstand local loads, unless proper temporary repairs made so that you can take a hike to the port, which is expected to make a full renovation; 7.5.2. the Board found a case of low persistence; 7.5.3. is not sufficient and reliable information, in an approved form, which by rapid and simple means, enables the master to take the ship during loading and in such a way that a safe margin of stability is maintained at all at any time the variables hiking conditions and do not allow unacceptable loads on the ship's structure; 7.5.4 not Board open-closing devices, hatch closing arrangements and watertight doors significantly worn or damaged; 7.5.5. the ship is reloaded; 7.5.6. draught marks or not is impossible to read them. 7.6. Areas under the Marpol Convention, annex I (references are given in brackets): 7.6.1. no oil-water filtering equipment, the oil discharge monitoring and control system or the 15 ppm alarm equipment or is it essential to wear out, or not acceptable; 7.6.2. .1 bilge water or oil residue storage tank capacity is insufficient for the intended voyage; 7.6.3. no oil record book (20 (5)); 7.6.4. illegal exhaust bypass; 7.6.5. no inspection report or it does not comply with MARPOL 13 G (3) (b). 7.7. Areas under the MARPOL Convention, annex II (references are given in brackets): 7.7.1. not P& Guide; 7.7.2. cargo is not divided into categories (3 (4)); 7.7.3. the loading journal is not available (9 (6)); 7.7.4. transport of oil-like substances without satisfying the requirements or without an appropriately amended certificate (14); 7.7.5. illegal discharge bypass fitted. 7.8. Areas under the STCW Convention: 7.8.1. crew members are not relevant or appropriate certificate, a valid temporary permit, or to provide documentary proof that the administration of the flag State have been submitted for approval; 7.8.2. no respect of the administration of the flag State to determine the safe manning requirements; 7.8.3. the deck or car watch arrangements to conform to the requirements specified for the ship by the flag State administration; 7.8.4. absence in a watch of a person qualified to handle for safe navigation, safety radio communications or the prevention of marine pollution relevant equipment; 7.8.5. There is no evidence of professional suitability for the duties assigned to seafarers for the safety of the ship and the prevention of pollution; 7.8.6. inability to provide for the first watch at the start of the voyage and for subsequent relieving watches persons who are sufficiently rested and otherwise fit for duty.
7.9. Areas under the ILO conventions: 7.9.1. insufficient food for voyage to next port. 7.9.2. insufficient potable water for voyage to the next item to the port; 7.9.3. the ship is extremely unsanitary conditions; 7.9.4. no heating in accommodation of a ship operating in areas where temperatures may be excessively low; 7.9.5. excessive garbage, corridors and living space with equipment or sealed cargo, or other hazardous conditions exist; 7.9.6. clear proof that crew members that need to provide for the first watch is too tired. 7.10. The ship should be detained, if not of the proper operation (or maintenance) of inert gas system, cargo-related or equipment or machinery, it considered to be sufficient justification for the suspension of the operation of the load. 7.11. this annex 7 list the deficiencies listed in is not comprehensive. The only drawbacks, which are the basis for detention in areas under the STCW Convention and listed in paragraph 7.8, is the only basis for detention in accordance with that Convention.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš annex 7 minimum requirements for OVK inspectors 1. Inspector OVK, which the Latvian maritime administration is empowered to carry out port-State control. 2. Minimum requirements for the qualifications of inspectors: OVK 2.1. at least one year of work experience in the control of the flag State Inspector's Office, performing inspections and the issuing of the certificate of the vessel in accordance with the requirements of the Convention, which has at least one of the following qualifications: Masters degree in 2.1.1, which entitles to drive ships with a tonnage and more, 1600B according to STCW Convention (II)/2.; 2.1.2. engineer's diploma, which gives the right to work on board a ship whose main power plant has a power 3000 KW and larger, according to the III/2 of the STCW Convention, rule; 2.1.3. outstanding exam shipbuilding engineer, mechanical engineer or an engineer related to the maritime fields of specialty and work experience in this specialty for at least five years; 2.2. the inspectors, whose qualifications comply with this annex 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 in the referred, you will also need at least five years of work experience in the sea, according to either the deck or car crew officer positions; 2.3. relevant or higher education or other equivalent training, marine safety inspectors of school education and diploma and at least two years of experience in the control of the flag State Inspector's Office, carrying out inspections and issue certificates in accordance with the requirements of the Convention; 2.4. the English language skills; 2.5. the provisions of the international conventions and arrangements, which are carried out in port State control, familiarity. 3. inspector posts in OVK can also work persons Latvian maritime administration recruited and which does not meet all the criteria set out above.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš Annex 8 publication of information about the detention and inspection 1. the information to be published in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 56, include the following information: 1. name; 1.2. the IMO number; 1.3. type of vessel; 1.4. gross tonnage; 1.5. year of construction indicated in the ship's safety certificates;
1.6. the owner or operator of the ship's name and address; 1.7. where a ship carrying liquid or solid cargoes in bulk, the charterer responsible for the selection of the vessel, the name, address and type of Charter; 1.8. the flag State; 1. one or more classification societies, where relevant which has/have issued to this ship the class certificates, if any; 1.10. one or more classification societies or any other entity that is specified for the ship on behalf of the flag State by the certificate provided for in the Convention; 1.11. the previous expanded inspection port and date, where applicable, or is given a detention order; 1.12. the port and date of the last special examination, as well as the name of the Organization, which has carried out this test; 1.13. the number of detentions during the 24 previous months; 1.14. the country and port of detention; 1.15. the date when the detention was lifted; 1.16. the length of detention days; 1.17. the number of the shortcomings detected and clear and explicit reasons for the detention; 1.18. Description of the measures taken by the administration of the flag State or classification society in response to the detention of the ship; 1.19. If the vessel is prohibited entry to the ports of the European Union – clear and explicit reasons for this prohibition; 1.20. an indication whether the classification society or other private body that carried out the survey has a responsibility in relation to the deficiencies which, alone or together, led to detention; 1.21. a description of the measures taken in the case of a ship voyage to the nearest appropriate repair yard, or which banned entry to all the ports of the European Union. 2. Insert the information in the SIReNAC system concerning ships inspected, include the following information: the name of the vessel 2.1; 2.2. the IMO number; 2.3. type of vessel; 2.4. gross tonnage; 2.5. construction year; 2.6. the owner or operator of the ship's name and address; 2.7. in the case of ships carrying liquid or solid cargoes in bulk, the charterer responsible for the selection of the vessel, name and address, and the type of Charter; 2.8. the flag State; 2.9. one or more classification societies, where relevant which has/have issued to this ship the class certificates, if any;
2.10. one or more classification societies or any other entity that is specified for the ship on behalf of the flag State by the certificate provided for in the Convention, including the mention of the certificates concerned; 2.11. the port State of inspection and time; 2.12. the number and nature of deficiencies.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš 9. inspection report

The inspection report shall include the following information: 1. General information: 1. the competent institution that wrote the report. 1.2. time and place of inspection; 1.3. vessel name; 1.4. the flag; 1.5. type of vessel; 1.6. The IMO number; 1.7. the call sign; 1.8. gross tonnage; 1.9. dedveit (if appropriate); 1.10. year of construction indicated in the ship's safety certificates; 1.11. one or more classification societies, where relevant which has/have issued to this ship the class certificates, if any; 1.12. one or more classification societies or any other entity that is specified for the ship on behalf of the flag State by the certificate provided for in the Convention; 1.13. the owner or operator of the ship's name and address; 1.14. If a ship carrying liquid or bulk of the charterer responsible for the selection of the vessel, name and address, and the type of Charter; 1.15. the inspection report of dialing the final date; 1.16. indication that detailed information on an inspection or a detention may be subject to publication. 2. Information concerning the certificate of inspection: 2.1 issued pursuant to those provisions of this Convention, showing the body or organization that issued the certificate, the date of issue and expiry date; 2.2. the parts and elements that are checked (detailed or expanded inspection); 2.3. type of inspection (inspection, more detailed inspection, expanded inspection, inspection, detention, concentrated inspection campaign, activity alarms check);
2.4. the alarm mimic; 2.5. information about the last annual or starpapskat; 2.6. the lack of vessels; 2.7. the measures to be taken. 3. additional information in the event of detention: 3.1. "the captain of the ship is detained," the date of issue; 3.2. "the statement about the release of" date of issue; 3.3. nature of the deficiencies justifying detention of a ship (references to conventions, when they apply); 3.4. information about the last starpapskat or annual reviews; 3.5. a classification society or other private body that carried out the inspection, is responsible for the deficiencies which, alone or together, is the reason for the detention, which is applicable; 3.6. the measures to be taken.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš, annex 10. Information provided by the Latvian maritime administration 1. each year, the maritime administration of Latvia, at the latest by 1 April, the European Commission provided the following data for the previous year: 1.1. number of inspectors acting on behalf of the port State control system. This information shall be submitted by completing table 1: table 1 port/region full time number of inspectors part-time number of inspectors ¹ transition to full time X port …



Y port. ..



¹ if the inspection together carried out due to the port State control, is only part of the work of the inspectors, the total number of inspectors into the number equivalent to full-time inspectors.
This information is provided at the national level and for each of the Latvian port. In this annex the port means single port and the geographical area in which the inspector or officer shall, where appropriate, the group comprises a number of separate ports. One inspector may work in more than one port/geographical area.
1.2. Individual ships that entered the port, Latvia. 2. the Latvian maritime administration every six months, submit to the European Commission for ports of Latvia joined the list of the ships that the ship's IMO number in min and the arrival date. This list is not defined, the ship which carried out regular ferry service. As an alternative to the above, the SIReNAC system ships arriving every day in Latvian ports than regular ferry services, the IMO numbers and the date of arrival. 3. the Latvian maritime administration shall submit to the European Commission to this annex referred to in paragraph 2 of the regular ferry traffic lists, as well as inform of any changes in this traffic.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš annex 11. Refusal of access to ports 1. Categories of ships, which may prohibit the entry into the ports of the European Union: 1.1. gas and chemical tankers; 1.2. bulk carrier; 1.3. oil tankers; 1.4. passenger ships. 2. the procedures in connection with the prohibition to enter the ports of the European Union: 2.1 if found the ship's compliance with this provision, paragraph 29, and the ship in the port of Latvia is on the second or third time, the Latvian maritime administration shall notify the master and the owner or operator of a ship entering the prohibition order. Latvian maritime administration shall inform the flag State administration, the classification society concerned, the Member States of the European Union, the European Commission, the maritime administrative centre (the Centre administratif des Affaires Maritimes) and the Secretariat of the Paris Memorandum; 2.2. the access refusal order, immediately after delivery the ship sail after deficiencies, which were the basis for the detention of the ports of Latvia have been rectified. 3. in order to achieve the access refusal order lifted, the owner or operator shall submit an official request to the Latvian marine administration, adding the administration of the flag State of the vessel issued a certificate showing that the ship fully complies with the relevant provisions of the Convention. If necessary, the owner or operator together with a request to cancel the entry prohibition order shall also be submitted to the classification society which has been assigned to class a for the vessel issued a certificate showing that the ship complies with the relevant classification societies established class standards. 4. The access refusal order repealed only by Latvian maritime administration vessel OVK inspectors repeated inspections on any of the ports and if you have evidence that the ship fully complies with the applicable requirements of the international conventions. 5. If the port for which this annex is in paragraph 4, the agreement referred to, is located in the territory of the European Union, the competent authorities of the port State to the maritime administration of Latvia agreement may allow the ship to enter the port only to perform re-inspection and verify that the ship complies with this paragraph 3 of the annex. 6. Repeated inspection is performed for the expanded inspection. Expanded inspection costs shall be borne by the owner or operator. 7. If the results of the expanded inspection satisfy the Latvian marine administration, the access refusal order is cancelled in accordance with paragraph 3 of this annex. The owner or operator shall be informed thereof in writing. 8. Latvia shall inform the maritime administration of its decision to the flag State administration, the classification society concerned, the Member States of the European Union, the European Commission, the administrative centre of Maritime Affairs and the Secretariat of the Paris Memorandum. 9. Information on the vessels banned from European Union ports, made available in the SIReNAC system and published in accordance with paragraph 56 of these regulations and annex 8.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš 12. attachment of the international and European Union requirements for flight data recording systems listed below in this paragraph 1 class ships, if they call at the ports of the European Union, shall be fitted with a voyage data recording system that complies with IMO resolution 861 (20) operational standards and International Electrotechnical Commission (sec) standard no 61996 of the inspection laid down standards: 1.1. passenger ships built on July 1, 2002 or later; 1.2. the ro-ro passenger ships, built before 1 July 2002, not later than the first inspection in July 1, 2002 or later; 1.3. passenger ships, other than ro-ro passenger ships, built before 1 July 2002, not later than 1 January 2004; 1.4. for vessels that are not passenger vessels with tonnage and 3000B more who built on July 1, 2002 or later. 2. for the purposes of this paragraph, the following classes of ships built before 1 July 2002, shall be fitted with a voyage data recording system, which meets the relevant IMO standards: 2.1. cargo ships with a capacity of 20, 000B and no later than 1 January 2007; 2.2. cargo vessels and tonnage 3000B and less than 20, 000B no later than 1 January 2008.
The maritime Department Director a. Krastiņš13. Annex