Internal Regulations For The Preparation And Coordination Of Project Procedures

Original Language Title: Iekšējo normatīvo aktu projektu sagatavošanas un saskaņošanas kārtība

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/90921

Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 567 in Riga, June 29, 2004 (pr. No 39 23) internal legislative drafting and consultation procedure Issued under Cabinet installations article 14 of the law, first paragraph, point 3 i. General questions 1. determines the order in which to prepare and coordinate the following internal normative acts projects: 1.1 Cabinet Member's instructions and recommendations;
1.2. the direct administration of the instructions and recommendations of the head of projects;
1.3. public entities derived organs, authorities and officials of the instructions and recommendations of the project. 2. Where, in accordance with the law of public administration facilities or other external internal laws and legislative proposal (hereinafter the project) must be coordinated with the higher authority or a member of the Cabinet of Ministers (hereinafter referred to as the higher authority) and the Ministry of Justice, the first line with the higher authority and then by the Justice Ministry. II. Project design and coordination of the shipment 3. developing project, followed: 3.1. legal technical requirements;
3.2. the documentation requirements, also the Cabinet of 23 April 1996, the Regulation No 154 ' document design and design rules "and the Cabinet of Ministers of 28 May 2002, the instruction No 3" Cabinet roll down the agenda document electronic circulation procedures "established documentation requirements;
3.3. the Latvian language spelling and style requirements. 4. If a project is linked to the implementation of European Union directives, the project includes an informative reference to European Union directives. 5. the explanatory memorandum attached to the draft that: 5.1 based project;
5.2 indicate other relevant information. 6. sending the project to match the higher authority or the Ministry of Justice, accompanied by a covering letter indicating the project Executive, its phone number and e-mail address. The covering letter to the Ministry of Justice indicate that with a higher authority and the date on which the project is coordinated. 7. If the project is urgent, the covering letter indicating the desired date by which it must be consistent. The reconciliation period may not be less than three working days. 8. project higher authority or the Ministry of Justice sent in paper form, as well as to the higher authorities of the electronic mail address or the official of the Ministry of Justice electronic mail address kanceleja@tm.gov.lv. 9. If the project is sent to the harmonization of the regulatory amendments in legislation, the internal it adds relevant internal regulations. The internal regulations, which may not be amended to add, if it's published in the newspaper "Latvian journal" and the introductory part of the project you indicated in the publication of the newspaper "journal". III. evaluation of the project's highest authority and the Ministry of Justice 10. Higher Authority assess whether project: 10.1 develop, subject to the competence of the authority;
10.2. comply with the internal regulations issued by the higher authority;
10.3. it is appropriate, where the body is in a higher authority;
10.4. meet this provision in paragraph 3 and 11. 11. The Ministry of Justice is considering whether the project: 11.1. meet the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia, the law and other external laws and regulations;
11.2. the General principles of law, including the principles of public administration and administrative procedure;
11.3. comply with European Union law and Latvia's international obligations;
11.4. meet the external regulatory authority contained in the Act and, if the internal regulatory acts issued on the basis of legislation;
11.5. does not include provisions which restrict the rights of individuals, and therefore included only external legislation. 12. The Ministry of Justice does not evaluate the project's compliance with this provision in paragraph 3. If the project obviously does not meet these requirements, the Ministry of justice project may not match. 13. the higher authority and the Ministry of Justice assesses the project within two weeks. 14. The provisions of paragraph 7 in the case of higher authority and the Ministry of justice project to assess the time limit specified on the cover sheet. If the higher authority and the Ministry of Justice due to the volume of work can not assess project within the time limit specified on the cover sheet, it shall immediately inform the originator of the project, indicating a possible deadline. IV. Coordination and opinion 15. Higher Authority after project evaluation: 15.1 under the project and make suggestions, if any;
15.2. within the project, arguing that it does not comply with this provision in paragraph 10. Those decisions are based. 16. If a higher authority shall coordinate the project (15.1), so this rule 7 or 13, paragraph within the authority shall forward its opinion (paper and electronic), indicating that the project is consistent, as well as specified in the proposal, if any. Renegotiation with the higher authority is required, if the Ministry of Justice, in assessing the project, finds that rule 18.4. the conditions referred to in point. 17. If a higher authority within the project (15.2), so this rule 7 or 13, paragraph within the authority shall forward its opinion (paper and electronic), indicating that the project is not consistent, as well as the grounds for this decision. In this case, the Authority projects and send them repeated coordination, or decide on the issue. 18. The Ministry of Justice after the evaluation of the project: the project without accordance 18.1. objections and proposals;
18.2. for the project and make suggestions;
18.3. the project with objections;
18.4. do not subject the project if it is unlawful. 19. If the project is agreed without objections (18.1 and 18.2), the Ministry of Justice 7. these provisions or the period referred to in paragraph 13, the authority shall forward its opinion (paper and electronic), indicating that the project is aligned with no objections, as well as specified in the proposal, if any. 20. If the Ministry of Justice coordinated the project with the opposition or conflict project (18.3 and 18.4), so this rule 7 or 13, paragraph within the authority shall forward its opinion (paper and electronic), indicating that the project is aligned with the opposition or not aligned, as well as the grounds for this decision. 21. If the Authority agrees with the proposals, it shall take them into account. 22. If the Ministry of Justice agreed with the objections, the project authority shall consider an objection, specifying the project and send the specified project to the Justice Ministry for further coordination, highlighting the text specifies location. The harmonisation carried out repeated this rule 7 or 13 time limit referred to in paragraph. 23. If the Ministry of justice within the draft, giving the opinion that it is unlawful, it recycles or decide on the issue. 24. The Ministry of Justice or the higher authority may invite other authorities to the meeting of officials responsible for sending information to the authorities and the responsible official email address at least three working days before the meeting. 25. If it is agreed at the meeting that the Ministry of Justice does not maintain its objections, the three working days, send to the official responsible for information (paper and electronic), indicating that the project is aligned with no objections. 26. If agreement is reached at the meeting that the authority will take into account the objections of the Justice Department, it acts in accordance with the provisions of point 22. V. reference to internal legislative harmonisation 27. After this provision paragraph 16 of receipt of the opinion referred to in the e-mail body in the project include an indication of its alignment with the higher authority, indicating the highest authority and the date of receipt of the opinion: "consistent with the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 200 _ _ _ _ 2004. _____ _____". 28. by paragraph 19 of these rules in the opinion referred to in paragraph 25, or of receipt of the information referred to in the e-mail body in the project include an indication of its coordination with the Justice Ministry, arguing the opinion or the date of receipt of the information, "agreed with the Ministry of Justice and of 200 ___. _____ _____". 29. If the Justice Department has not given a reply to the public administration Act, article 77 of the equipment before the time limit expires, the authority in the Act to the internal regulations contain an indication that the project is intended to be consistent, indicating the date on which the project is intended to be consistent: "according to the State administration of machine article 77 of the law, the first paragraph is considered consistent with the ministries of Justice and of 200 ___. _____ _____". Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister shlesers Justice Minister a. location — Foreign Minister r. pīks