Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 293 in Riga on 9 June 2015 (pr. 17. § 28) national regulatory authorities direct the driver selection order Issued in accordance with national civil law 2.1 part of article 9 i. General questions 1. determines the order in which to direct State Administration Manager (civil servant) (hereinafter referred to as the authority) in the planning of the selection, nomination requirements and the assessment of the applicant. 2. selection process consists of the following stages: planning: selection 2.1 2.1.1. position the test criteria; 2.1.2. the applicant Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission); 2.1.3. the open invitation to tender; 2.2. evaluation of applicant: 2.2.1. the documentation submitted by the applicant; 2.2.2. applicant evaluation oral (oral): 2.2.2.1. negotiations on the applicant's motivation and vision for the authority of the applicant or industry priorities and development; 2.2.2.2. the applicant presentation skills; 2.2.2.3. the professional knowledge of the applicant; 2.2.3. the applicant management competence assessment. 3. the State Chancellery is responsible for the selection process requires preparation of the dossier, the selection process, the selection of technical and material storage, as well as participating in the evaluation of management competencies of the applicant. II. Select planning 4. If there is a vacant managerial post of the authority or a decision is taken on the head of the Authority's relocation or dismissal and the Member of the Cabinet of Ministers has adopted a decision on the open invitation to tender to the Manager of the authority, the Cabinet Member shall forward to the authorities of the State Chancellery Manager job description and be informed of the need to issue a public call for candidates for the posts of head of the authority. 5. the Head Office of the authority inspection criteria and their impact on the overall rating is determined, taking into account the complexity of their duties, responsibilities, authorities, as well as the size of the necessary reforms and innovation in a particular institution or industry. 6. the composition of the Commission and the President of the Commission by order approve the Cabinet Member. The members of the Commission, five persons, chosen from a list of persons under civil law, article 9, first paragraph, point 1 has been approved by the Cabinet of Ministers. 7. the State Chancellery at the Cabinet of Ministers on the recommendation of the members is entitled to invite the applicant evaluation process observers (hereinafter referred to as the observer), representing various non-governmental organisations or social partners. State Chancellery to large institutions, the Secretary of State, the State Chancellery and Pārresor coordination centre manager of the bidder evaluation process by the Cabinet of Ministers on the recommendation of the members invited two observers. Observers shall provide the Commission with its assessment. These ratings are recommendations. 8. the State Chancellery, in cooperation with the Commission and the relevant Member of the Cabinet of Ministers approves 10 questions about public administration structure and operating principles, budgeting, administrative processes and institutions. 9. Open for candidates to the post of the head of the authority the State Chancellery shall issue the official Edition of the "journal". The announcement about the open for candidates to the post of the head of the Authority also publishes Cabinet website on the internet and social networks. III. assessment of the applicant 10. To the first session of the Commission Commission members and observers invited by the State Chancellery. 11. The Chairman of the Commission meetings of the Commission and is responsible for the work of the Commission. Commission meetings are closed. The Commission, in the course of the hearing shall be recorded in the minutes. At the same time in the course of the hearing of the Commission can be fixed by using a sound recording or other technical means (to make the grade in the minutes of the Commission). 12. the Commission provides the secretariat functions of the State Chancellery. 13. the Commission shall be valid if the work of the Commission and take part in the adoption of the decision no less than four members of the Commission, including the Chairman of the Commission. 14. The Commission shall examine the documents filed by the applicant and detects if an applicant meets the civil servants (hereinafter referred to as the Clerk) post a letter to the applicant the minimum requirements and a letter to the applicant's educational and professional experience requirements. 15. If the applicant complies with the Office of the official letter to the applicant the minimum requirements and a letter to the applicant's educational and professional experience requirements, he or she is invited for the oral part. 16. the oral part consists of the following stages: 16.1 the tenderer and Commission conversation about motivation, applicant and the public administration values; 16.2. the applicant to the Commission not more than 15 minutes, presents the main conclusions and proposals contained in the candidate's vision for the authorities or industry priorities and development. The Commission shall ask the applicant to clarify the issues referred to in the conclusion of the presentation and the content of the proposal and be able to assess the applicant's vision for the authorities or industry priorities and developments, as well as his presentation skills; 16.3. the applicant answers 10 questions about public administration structure and operating principles, budgeting, administrative processes and institutions. 17. The applicant's vision for the authorities or industry priorities and development of each Member of the Commission shall assess the five-point scale in accordance with the evaluation criteria (annex 1). 18. the presentation of the applicant's skills in each Member of the Commission shall assess the five-point scale according to the defined action indicators (annex 2). 19. The applicant's professional knowledge of the legal, budgetary and financial management issues and the scope of the authority of each Member of the Commission shall be assessed for each answer given by one of the following assessments: 19.1. the answer is given (1 point); 19.2. provided a partial answer (0.5 points); 19.3. the answer is not provided (0). 20. The oral part of the Commission is entitled to ask the applicant questions in a foreign language, which requires job duties. 21. If the performance of their duties, according to the authorities, or the nature of the sector requires foreign language knowledge, the Commission has the right to call upon the experts that can determine the degree of knowledge of a foreign language of the applicant. 22. If all oral phases of the assessment of the applicant of the Commission have at least three points, applicants invited to leadership competency assessment. 23. The applicant's assessment of the competence of management in the form of an interview or through other more appropriate – competences-assessment method, there are two independent network of experts and a representative of the State Chancellery. Applicant management competency appraisal interview can be fixed by using a sound recording or other technical means. 24. Joint management competencies of each candidate's assessment of both draw independent personnel specialists. 25. management competencies in the evaluation assessed five of the following applicant's competencies: 25.1. relationship building and maintenance; 25.2. motivating and developing staff; 25.3. team management; 25.4. the Organization value awareness; 25.5. orientation towards development; 6. orientation towards results; 25.7. change management; 25.8. able to take decisions and assume responsibility; 25.9. strategic vision. 26. All applicants shall assess the same competencies identified in the institution's Manager's validation criteria using the same competency models. The post inspection criteria determine which of the two management competency is considered critical in particular of management competencies. 27. The applicant's management competencies assessment is considered inappropriate, if any of the critical leadership competencies are assessed by "improved" or "unsatisfactory" and any of the other leadership competencies are assessed by "disappointing". 28. In the light of the Commission's assessment of the applicant and provided the applicant management competence assessment, the Commission shall take a decision on the applicant or applicants who best meet the Clerk's job description, requirements and provides the relevant cabinet member a written recommendation on the appointment of the applicant or applicants. The recommendation shall be accompanied by information about the observer rating. 29. The relevant cabinet member before a decision on the promotion of the applicant for recruitment is entitled to invite the applicant or proposed by the Commission and to the applicant. 30. Before the adoption of the decision on the promotion of the applicant for recruitment after the Cabinet members of the State Chancellery shall have the right to collect the applicant's former employer and partner feedback. 31. the State Chancellery within three working days after the Commission or the relevant cabinet member's decision to notify the applicants of the decision on the applicant. If the decision is negative and the applicant does not move to the next stage of the evaluation of the applicant or the appointment, the decision of the State Chancellery shall notify in writing. 32. the rules shall enter into force on 1 September 2015. The Prime Minister is the Rapidity of the Newsletters Finance Minister John Rare annex 1 Cabinet 9 June 2015 regulations no 293 evaluation criteria the applicant's vision for institutions or industry priorities and development rating (points) explanation 5 defines institutions or industry vision and strategy for national development context. Identifies the new strategic directions of development authorities or industry strategy and transform it to authorities or the industry's future priorities of action. Up bodies or industry development vision and priorities that are realistic and desirable 4 define problems, develop options and choose the solutions according to authorities or industry vision and strategy. Identifies barriers and opportunities in the sector and to the authority or under the adjusted himself proposed lines of action. Understandable and easy-to-understand manner characterized by authorities or industry development vision and priorities in 3 analyzes the essay proposal compliance with authorities or industry objectives and achievable results and adjusts the working objectives of the existing strategic development directions. Assess the gap between the existing situation and the desired development of the strategic direction for the future, but did not offer a plan of action to reduce these differences. Defines the General authorities or industry strengths and weaknesses and the contribution of the parties or the attainment of the objectives of the sector 2 is the common knowledge of institutions, or scope and sector trends. Clear the institutions or sector strategic directions. Generally identifies the possible strategic directions of development in the future, according to the existing strategy or focus 1 not within the scope of the sector and development trends. Lacking strategic vision Finance Minister John Rare annex 2 Cabinet 9 June 2015 regulations no 293 action figures presentation skills assessment rating (points) explanation 5 communicates strategically to achieve specific objectives. Plan the optimal message content, time, audience, and other aspects. Public speaking, able to present information clearly, understandable and easy-to-understand way. Able to provide convincing answers to the questions of the Commission 4 the ability to understand and to present information, tactical to explain complex or unpleasant (not popular). Ability to provide reasoned answers to questions from the Commission 3 the ability to speak and understand the public to outline prezentējam topics. Without inciting argues their views. Heard other losing 2 to publicly speak with difficulty, responses to Commission questions provided inconclusive or not provided at all 1 could not publicly define the authorities or industry strategic objectives and the nature of its development vision. Without the incentives do not argue their views. Communicate to the Commission, not to suppress negative emotions. Sometimes interrupt or speak with the Finance Minister John a Rare