Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 737 in Riga in 2005 on September 27 (Mon. No 54 13) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 March 2004, the Regulation No 124 "rules on the criteria the national budget to grant local authorities the European Union structural funds co-financed projects" Issued under the cabinet installation article 14 of the law in the first part of paragraph 3 to make Cabinet 2 March 2004-Regulation No 124 "rules on the criteria the national budget to grant local authorities the European Union structural funds co-financed projects" (Latvian journal in 2004, 37, 110 no; 2005, no. 13) the following amendments: 1. provisions of title be expressed as follows: "the provisions on the criteria of the national budget to local governments and grant planning regional development agencies of the European Union structural funds co-financed projects". 2. Put 1, 2, 3 and 4 by the following: "1. the provisions laid down the criteria for the national budget to local governments grant award and the planning region development agency, which acts as the regional development Act article 18, second subparagraph in specific functions (hereinafter-the planning region development agency), co-financed by the structural funds of the European Union for the implementation of the projects. 2. The municipality or planning region development agency, which is the European Union's structural fund financing requested, in the implementation of the Union's structural funds co-financed projects receive Government grants of up to 60% of the total required funds national part of the eligible costs, which invests in municipal or planning region development agency, if so, shall submit to the European Union's structural funds co-financed project application, requests the grant of a part that does not cover the self-financing of the project results. 3. State budget grants to municipalities and regional development planning agency of the European Union structural funds co-financed projects awarded, taking into account the local, district and municipal planning regional area development index (hereinafter territorial development index) (1, 2, 2.1 and 2.2). 4. the total national distribution of funding between public and municipal budget allocations or the planning region development agency funding the European Union co-financed projects (annex 3) are defined in the following groups: 4.1 cities and counties, which comprise the town; 4.2. the parishes and counties, which contain only parishes; 4.3. the district; 4.4. the planning regions. " 3. Replace paragraph 5 of the numbers and the words "1, 2, and in annex 2.1" with numbers and the words "1, 2, 2.1 and 2.2 of the annex." 4. Supplement with 2.2 as follows: Annex "annex 2.2 Cabinet 2 March 2004-Regulation No 124 of Territory Development Index and rank the planning region (after the 2003 data) no BC planning region territory development index rank Group 1. Riga planning region 1 I 2.1.540 Kurzeme region-0.535 2 3 IV. Zemgale planning region-0.541 3 4 IV. Vidzeme planning region-1.046 4 V 5. Latgale planning region-1.396 5 V 5. Express 3. name the following : "The national distribution of co-financing between the State and municipal budget allocations or the planning region development agency funding of projects co-financed by the European Union". 6. the supplement to annex 3 table 4 by the following: ' 4. table no BC planning regions group planning the number of regions of the territory development index (interval) the national budget allocation (%) of the planning region development agency funding (%)

1. V 2 below-60 40 2 0.664 2 0.664 IV-to-0.358 50 50 3. Iii 0-to-40 60 4 0.357 0.111. (II) 0-1 up to 30 70 5.0.245 0.110 I higher than 0.245 20 80 ' 7. To make the title of annex 4 by the following: "local authorities, districts and regions of territorial development planning index detection methodology". 8. Express 4. point 1 of the annex by the following: "1. The local authorities and the regional territorial development planning index (hereinafter territorial development index) is calculated separately for County group, a group of city, district and planning regions. The County includes urban group if it contains a city or County, if the Group of County represent only parishes. " 9. Express 4. point 2.3 of the annex by the following: "2.3 the planning areas and regions using eight indicators." 10. Replace the table in annex 4. "region" with the words "district or planning regions". 11. Add to annex 4, paragraph 6.3, after the word "authorities" with the words "and the planning region development agency".
Prime Minister a. Halloween regional development and local Government Minister m. kučinskis