Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No 821 Riga 2006 (3 October. No 50 46) University, College and higher education program accreditation order Issued in accordance with article 9 of the Law School is the first part of the third paragraph of article 10.1, the seventh paragraph of article 55 and article 14 of the law on Education of 8, 10 and 11, article 15, paragraph 5 of article 27 and article 33, third part i. General questions 1. determines the procedure to be accredited universities, colleges and their implementation in the first and second level professional higher education programs higher education programs, academic degrees, and doctoral education programs (hereinafter referred to as the higher education programs).
2. a decision on the accreditation of the University or College of higher education adopted by the Council. The decision on accreditation of higher education programmes adopted higher education program accreditation Commission (hereinafter Accreditation Commission). Decision on high school or college accreditation is accepted if at the date of adoption of the decision of the accredited is not less than 50% of the University or College of higher education implemented during the program.
3. the decision of the Council of higher education for high school or college credentials were approved by the Ministry of education and science, the high school or college credentials page. The Accreditation Commission decision on accreditation of higher education programs approved by the Ministry of education and science, the issue of accreditation of higher education programs page.
II. High school or college application for accreditation 4. accredited university or To College, Ministry of education and science or the Rector of a University shall be submitted to the Director of the College's accreditation application signed (hereinafter application) and the rules referred to in annex 1. That information shall also be submitted in electronic form. High school or college self-assessment report is available for any person, and University or College at the request of the person is obliged to present it. The University Senate or College Council, confirming the high school or college self-assessment report, determines what part of it are to be published in a high school or college website on the internet.
5. the application of these rules and annex 1 documents shall be submitted in the language of the country, adding the translation in English or another language appropriate for high school or college to a goal after consulting the Council of higher education. Documents shall be submitted to the national accreditation of the College.
6. the application shall specify: 6.1 high school or college;
6.2. high school or college legal address and phone number;
6.3. high school or college education registry registration certificate number;
6.4. the person's name and job title, which the University or college with accreditation by the sort of issues;
6.5. high school or college affiliates, their addresses and phone numbers.
III. accreditation of higher education programs for the application 7. Two years after the implementation of a programme of higher education or not less than seven months before the higher education programs accreditation expiry of graduate school or College shall submit to the Ministry of education and science or the Rector of the University in the master's signed application to the accreditation of higher education programmes and the provisions referred to in annex 2 of documents. That information shall also be submitted in electronic form. Higher education programs in the self-assessment report is available for any person, and University or College at the request of the person is obliged to present it. The University Senate or Council, affirming College higher education programs self-assessment report, determines what part of it are to be published in a high school or college website on the internet.
8. Graduate School or college documents required for evaluation of higher education programs, add higher education programs of study results and the overall content, structure, and scope of the comparison with the same level of similar accredited programs in higher education, universities or colleges in Latvia if the following higher education programs are being implemented in other universities or colleges. The comparison is carried out in accordance with the classification of the Latvian education, choosing a similar thematic areas of education higher education programs. The University also higher education programs of study results and the overall content, structure, and size comparison with at least two countries recognised the other countries of the European Union of the universities of the same level of similar programs in higher education.
9. the application shall specify: 9.1 higher education programs;
9.2. the higher education program code klasifik in the Latvian educational information;
9.3. the higher education and the implementation of the programme;
9.4. the implementation of a programme of higher education (universities, high schools or colleges, College of the branch branch address), type and form;
9.5. requirements for entering higher education programs;
9.6. you want to assign the degree or qualification, or degree and the qualification;
9.7. high school or college;
6.1. the person's name and job title, which the University or college with accreditation by the sort of issues.
10. the application of these provisions and in annex 2 of these documents shall be submitted in the language of the country, adding the translation in English or another language according to the higher education programs aim at harmonisation with the Accreditation Commission. Documents the first level professional higher education programmes and the rest repeating the submission and evaluation of programmes in the national language.
IV. Higher education programs Accreditation Commission 11. Minister of education and Science approved the Accreditation Commission and appointed by the Chairman of the personnel, and the Deputy Secretary. The Accreditation Commission include: 11.1. one representative of the higher education Council, Science Council of Latvia, Latvian Association of College, two representatives from the Council of Rectors (one National University representative, one representative of the private University), as well as three Ministry of education and Science representatives;
11.2. one representative of the employers ' Confederation of Latvia and of vocational training and employment of the trilateral cooperation apakšpadom;
11.3. The Latvian Student Union representative.
12. If higher education thematic group matches one of the Ministry's area of competence, specified in the regulations, the Accreditation Commission President invited to higher education programs Accreditation Commission meeting of the authorized representative of the Ministry concerned and the delegation of the Ministry of industry experts with advisory capacity.
13. the Accreditation Commission: 13.1 review the high school or college application submitted on the University or College of higher education implemented in program accreditation;
13.2. This provision confirms the 16 referred to the composition of the Evaluation Committee, its head and this provision in paragraph 47 of the experts;
13.3. based on the evaluation of the Commission's experts and observers provided by the higher education quality assessment program and the accreditation of the members of the Commission analysis of the application, shall take a decision on the question of accreditation of higher education programmes;
13.4. Decides on changes in higher education accreditation page;
13.5. the Minister of education and science provides an opinion on the request for withdrawal of accreditation;
13.6. dealing with quality change evaluation organisations and related issues.
14. The Accreditation Commission term of Office of members is four years (with the exception of Latvian Student Union representative). Latvian Student Union delegate's term of Office shall be two years.
V. accreditation progress 15. Ministry of education and science to check whether the application for University or college and implement higher education programmes and on the documents supplied all the necessary information and, if necessary, in addition to requesting the missing information. This information shall be submitted within 30 days after the request.
16. in order to assess the University or College of higher education evaluation Council set up a Commission and approved its composition. To evaluate higher education programs Accreditation Commission creates the Evaluation Committee and approved its composition. Professional higher education program evaluation the work of the Commission without voting rights, involving higher education program graduates to potential employers ' representatives as observers. These representatives recommend graduate school or College, in coordination with the concerned employers.
17. the work of the evaluation panel organized by the Ministry of education and science.

18. The Evaluation Committee shall consist of at least three experts, of which at least one expert is from abroad. The Evaluation Committee of the College and first level professional higher education program evaluation Committee, all experts can be from Latvia. If the higher education programme in high school or College Branch is initiated after the accreditation of higher education programs, its implementation in high school or College Branch evaluates and opinion as to provide at least one expert.
19. the evaluation of the work of the Commission without the right to vote at least one Latvian Student Union observer delegation. Latvian Student Union observer of the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission with the Evaluation Commission. Evaluation of the work of the Commission may participate, without the right to vote also Council of higher education Accreditation Commission recommend or observers. Or the Council for higher education Accreditation Commission observers recommended by the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission with the Evaluation Commission.
20. the assessment by the Commission, having regard to the provisions mentioned in the annex 3 of the University, college or higher education program evaluation criteria, evaluate the high school or college submission and the actual circumstances in the University or college and, if necessary, request additional information.
21. each evaluation Commission expert opinion.
22. The Evaluation Committee shall prepare a common opinion and opinions with the experts shall submit it to the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission.
23. the general opinion of the Evaluation Committee shall be prepared taking into account the following sources of information: 23.1. universities, colleges or higher education program pašn assessment;
23.2. the student, alumni and employer (real or potential) survey results;
23.3. a national inspection and observer information about high school or college if such is provided;
23.4. individual opinions by experts;
14.6. the Evaluation Committee of experts visit the University or college results.
24. The Evaluation Committee shall consult with the common opinion of high school or College concerned management, academic staff and student representatives.
25. by paragraph 24 of these regulations consultations referred to in the final opinion of the Evaluation Committee shall be submitted to the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission.
26. the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission shall consult the high school or College, with the submission of the Commission's evaluation of the opinion and, if necessary, with the actual conditions in the University or college.
27. a decision on the accreditation of the University or College of higher education adopted by the Council within the time limits laid down in the Law School. The decision on accreditation of higher education programs Accreditation Commission accepts University law within the prescribed period.
28. For each accredited higher education programmes of the Ministry of education and Science issued the accreditation of higher education programs page (4. and annex 5). Credentials page is provided with a university or College, and signed by the Minister of education and science. Accreditation page showing: 28.1. high school or college;
28.2. higher education the application name and code in accordance with the classification of education;
17.6. to be granted the degree or qualification, or degree and the qualification;
28.4. the higher education programme and the format;
28.5. higher education in the implementation of the programme;
28.6. reference to the Accreditation Commission decision under which issues accreditation page;
17.8. the accreditation of higher education programs.
29. for each university or college accredited by the Ministry of education and Science issued accreditation (annex 6). The accreditation page for the signature of the Minister of education and science. Accreditation page showing: 29.1. high school or college;
29.2. high school or college legal address;
29.3. high school or college education registry registration certificate number;
18.3. high school or college affiliates and their addresses;
29.5. the reference to the decision of the Accreditation Commission, which issued the accreditation page.
30. The accreditation page prepared and recorded in the Ministry of education and science.
31. If the assessment by the Commission, or the Council for higher education Accreditation Commission finds deficiencies in the operation of the University or college or higher education programme, which is inevitable in the current higher education program, accredited by them for two years. For two years an accredited higher education program accreditation during the validity period of the page has the same rights as accredited for six years in higher education program.
32. If the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission adopted the decision to refuse accreditation to the University, college or higher education program, College, or a College may submit an application for accreditation no earlier than six months and not later than the year following the adoption of that decision. If a University, college or higher education program not accredited or if the University or College during the year without submitting, University, college or higher education program is considered not accredited.
33. The accreditation of the University, college or higher education program may be refused in accordance with University statutory reasons.
34. the Minister for education and science can determine the high school or college accreditation at the extraordinary Council of higher education accreditation or the initiative of the Commission or make a proposal to the Commission on the accreditation of higher education programs for the accreditation of the extraordinary discovery.
35. High school or college send a written higher education Accreditation Council and the decision of the Commission. The Accreditation Commission decision on the refusal to accredit higher education program, as well as the accreditation of higher education programs of the withdrawal may be appealed within one month of the date of entry into force of the decision, shall submit the relevant application to the Ministry of education and science. Higher education the Council decision on the refusal to accredit the University or College, as well as high school or college credentials may appeal to the Court of the cancellation.
36. The Minister of education and science may withdraw accreditation of high school or College, or to submit a proposal for the Commission of accreditation of higher education programs accreditation in accordance with the cancellation of the University law. On the University referred to in relevant law violations considered the following offences: 36.1. University, college or higher education programme in the implementation of the changes, which alters the accreditation application under this provision, paragraph 45, and the data provided to the applicant within 30 days they are not informed the Commission of accreditation;
36.2. the University or college within three years is not implemented in any accredited higher education program;
36.3. the University or college pursuing higher education program, shape or form, other than those referred to in the decision of the Commission of accreditation and accreditation of higher education programs, except the new licensed higher education programs;
22.6. in implementing programmes of higher education, fundamental education violated regulatory provisions or emergency accreditation found that higher education in master's or doctoral degree studies do not conform to the latest relevant scientific developments and insights.
37. decision on a University, college or higher education programs accreditation withdrawal shall be submitted for publication in the newspaper "Latvian journal" three working days from the time when the administrative act has become incontrovertible.
Vi. Higher education programs for the accreditation of the repeating progress 38. Accredited higher education program evaluation be submitted again at least every six years.
39. each academic year the University or College shall prepare a self-evaluation report for each accredited course. Self-evaluation report for the previous academic year, the University Senate approved or College Council during the current academic year, 15 October. Self-evaluation reports approved University or college by the Ministry of education and Science together with the request or application for accreditation shall be submitted to the Ministry of education and science.
40. If the higher education program has been accredited for six years and not been this provision 45. changes referred to in the application for accreditation of the College, or again the College added during that period, prepare a self-evaluation report indicates that the General accreditation received necessary information referred to in annex 2 to these regulations, chapter III.
41. The Accreditation Commission may request inspection of education national report on higher education assessed compliance with the laws and regulations of the program requirements.

42. the Commission approved the accreditation of the experts who consult with high school or college education, documents submitted and State inspection reports, if one is filed, and shall draw up a written report to the Commission for the accreditation of University, College and or. University or College shall have the right to request an assessment of higher education programs of these rules set out in chapter V.
43. After consultation of the expert's report, the Accreditation Commission has taken a decision on the accreditation of higher education programs for six years or the decision on the establishment of an evaluation Committee of higher education programs for detailed evaluation. In this case, the subsequent accreditation process complies with this provision of the procedures laid down in chapter V.
VII. Financing of 44. Accreditation, college or University higher education programs accredits the tion expenses from the University or college funds.
VIII. Changes to the University, college or higher education in 45. If a university or College in significant change or change of accredited higher education program, University or college within 30 working days, since the change was made, submit to the Accreditation Commission, or the Council for higher education the application with a request to confirm the changes. Significant changes to the meaning of these provisions is: 45.1. high school or college name changes, universities or the jazz or the colon, founder of reorganisation, liquidation or insolvency;
45.2. the higher education program, the kvalifik tion or degree in change;
45.3. change requirements when entering higher education programs;
28.2. the change of higher education programs location, type and form;
28.3. the common changes made during the period of accreditation of higher education programs in the duration that exceeds 20% of the applications for accreditation of higher education established in the programme duration;
45.6. high school and College, the founding of branches in reorganization or elimination;
28.4. University higher education concerned in elected academic staff qualifications changes if they relate to at least 20% of the academic posts in the total number of staff elected or if the changes referred to at least 50% of the total number of academic staff no longer working in the election, or at least 50% of the total number of the elected academic staff is not a doctoral degree.
46. the changes, for which the University or College must be reported, but which are not considered major changes, the meaning of these provisions is: 46.1. high school or college legal address change;
46.2. the higher education program code changes, a change in the classification of education of Latvia code;
46.3. the change in the person of the University or college with accreditation by the sort of issues;
46.4. the representation of the Foundation, reorganisation or liquidation.
47. the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission is empowered to approve expert, which appreciates the significant changes and give an opinion on them to the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission.
48. the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission has taken a decision on the admissibility of changes. If the Council for higher education accreditation or the Commission's decision is favourable, if required, are issued a new accreditation page. If the decision is negative, the University or College will continue the implementation of the programme according to the accreditation page specified. The Accreditation Commission's decision may be challenged in the month following the entry into force of the decision, shall submit the relevant application to the Ministry of education and science. Higher education Council decision can be appealed against in court within one month of the entry into force of the decision.
IX. Closing questions 49. Be declared unenforceable in the Cabinet of 16 October 2001, Regulation No 442 "in higher education institutions and study programmes accreditation rules" (Latvian journal, 2001, nr. 150).
50. The Ministry of education and Science approved the accreditation of higher education programmes, issued a new accreditation of higher education programmes.
51. The University, College and higher education program accreditation process, who started and not completed by the date of entry into force of the provisions are completed in accordance with the Cabinet of Ministers on 16 October 2001, the provisions of no. 442 "in higher education institutions and study programmes accreditation rules" (Latvian journal, 2001, nr. 150).
Prime Minister a. Halloween, Minister of education and science Rivž B Note: the wording of the entry into force of the provisions to the October 7, 2006.
   
1. the annex to Cabinet of 3 October 2006, regulations no 821 University or college accreditation documents to be added to the application i. high school or college self-assessment 1. High school or college goals and objectives.
2. High school or college and its perspective: 2.1 the long-term development concept, which includes details of planned high school or college structure changes, development opportunities, funding, reasons and sources, as well as internal and external factors impact analysis (to create all high school or college operating quality system);
2.2. high school or college infrastructure development plan for the next six years;
2.3. high school or college graduate job market Outlook for the next six years.
3. News on high school or College, University or college studies information of branches, base quantity and quality compliance with University or College of higher education implemented during the program and related research for the next six years: 3.1 details of higher education implementation requirements appropriate teaching and scientific literature, the laboratories, the necessary equipment, as well as logistical support;
3.2. message of support by qualified service personnel;
3.3. details of internal quality mechanisms and of information systems and the possibility of the exchange of information on national and international information networks;
3.4. details of study, leisure and housing and tuition fee system, as well as information about high school or College, the financial aid provided by the student.
4. High school or College, University or college affiliates representative quantitative indicators for the past three years: 4.1 higher education programs and student number (imatrikulēt and eksmatrikulēt, the number of student per year);
4.2. characteristics of academic personnel (total number, the number of persons who have a doctoral degree and master's degree, the Professor);
4.3. study funding (Government funding and student to financial volume);
4.4. the infrastructure support (study facilities and inform the Advisory base);
4.5. international cooperation (with other universities or colleges, concluded contracts, the mutual exchange of academic staff, international student exchange);
4.6 affiliates, their material resources, student number, the number of academic staff, pointing out how academic staff representatives have a doctoral degree or master's degree, the administrative and ancillary staff;
4.7. representation, their staff was.
5. the self-evaluation report is no more than 70000 marks. Self-assessment report and attachments shall be submitted in triplicate on A4 white paper along with the electronic version. The electronic version of the document to Latvian language and their translations in a single file. The documents submitted must be attached (preferably by binding) and sign a high school or College authorised person. Self-evaluation report content in electronic and paper version must be equivalent. Information set to be added to the table of contents. 
II. the attachments to be added to the Self-assessment (basic information) 6. Documents certifying that the University or College of education law are respected, the University Act, the vocational education Act and other legislative or regulatory requirements: 6.1. documents for the management structure and the study of the quality of internal control, student imatrikulācij criteria;
6.2. list of academic staff, degrees and academic posts;
6.3. the document proving that at least 50% elected academic staff working in a university or college and at least 50% of the elected academic staff in the University's doctorate degree.
7. Academic staff scientific biographies (including the most important in recent years, the list of scientific publications).
8. each annual activity reports since the previous accreditation.
9. the State revenue service issued a statement on the payment of taxes.
10. the contract between the student and the University or college.
11. the documents that define the student organization status.
12. The Aliens study opportunities and conditions.
III. Self assessment documents to be added to the (more)

13. more information is at the applicant considers important to be accredited to the University or college. More information can be added as a university or college representative documents. More information will be published in high school or college website on the internet.
Minister of education and science Rivž B, annex 2 to the Cabinet of Ministers of 3 October 2006, regulations no 821 higher education programs accreditation documents to be added to the application i. higher education programs self-assessment 1. Higher education program goals and objectives, and higher education programs learning the results of the study be acquired knowledge, skills and attitudes.
2. Higher education programs in the Organization (as changed the structure of higher education programs in the self-evaluation period), higher education programs plan compliance with the high school or college goals and objectives, as well as higher education programs internal quality mechanisms.
3. Higher education programs and includes a series of lectures, hands-on sessions, seminars and other measures of study annotation. Academic higher education programs provide a separate higher education programs mandatory, mandatory check and free choice as well as their amount, indicating higher education programs component of study results.
4. evaluation system (valuation methods selection and analysis of results).
5. Higher education in the practical implementation of the programme (the used methods and forms of study, academic staff research activity and its impact on student work, student involvement in research projects).
6. Higher education program evaluation perspective, taking into account Latvia's tasks to the European Union's common strategy. Evaluation criteria: 6.1. higher education programs in compliance with national standards of academic training or vocational higher education standard and the standards of the profession;
6.2. the employers ' survey of graduate employment in the next six years.
7. Student: 7.1 number of undergraduate programs;
7.2. the first study year number of imatrikulēt;
7.3. the number of graduates;
7.4. the student survey and analysis;
7.5. the Alumni survey and analysis;
7.6. student participation in the development process of study.
8. Higher education in academic staff employed in rating: 8.1. academic staff number, indicating the number of academic positions and the number of persons who have a doctoral degree or masters degree;
8.2. conformity of qualification of academic staff of the Department for the implementation of the objectives and tasks (project management, research direction and results), indicating that higher education program, not including higher education programs check parts, practices, and implementation of the national test, working at least 50% of the elected academic staff;
8.3. universities and universities in at least two have doctorate or professor in the science industry or science sectors implement higher education programme;
8.4. the academic recruitment, renewal, training and development policy for the next six years;
8.5. the higher education academic staff involved in the program must be highly qualified and competent to ensure the required student research skills, theoretical knowledge, skills and competencies.
9. the sources of funding and infrastructure support.
10. External Relations: 10.1. co-operation with employers;
10.2. cooperation with Latvian and foreign universities which implemented similar programs in higher education.
11. the document proving that if higher education program is eliminated, the applicant will provide the relevant higher education programs for the student an opportunity to continue education in another higher education program or in another University or College (financial justification or a contract with other accredited universities or colleges).
12. the higher education programs in the development plan.
13. the self-assessment report is no more than 70000 marks. This part only exceptionally be included in University or College, or a representative of the higher education program, which, in the applicant's opinion is very important. Self-assessment report and attachments shall be submitted in triplicate on A4 white paper along with the electronic version. The electronic version of the document to Latvian language and their translations in a single file. The documents submitted must be attached (preferably by binding) and sign a high school or College authorised person. Self-evaluation report content in electronic and paper version must be equivalent. Self evaluation report shall be accompanied by a table of contents.
II. the attachments to be added to the Self-assessment (basic information) 14. Higher education program self-evaluation added: 14.1 information showing that at least 50% of the elected academic staff working in a university or college and at least 50% of the elected academic staff in the University's doctoral degree;
14.2. academic staff research or artistic creative biography;
14.3. the study course descriptions;
14.4. for higher education programs learning in diploma and its annex (completed).
15. Higher education programs self-assessment confirmed by the contents of the corresponding document content, content fragments, proceedings or references.
16. the higher education program of the three compiling lists: 16.1. higher education programs all study course list, indicating the amount of the course design and implementation of responsible academic staff (recommended, in the form of a table);
16.2. academic staff list (position, education, academic or scientific degree, elected or hired for a time, the pasniedzam study courses);
16.3. the rest of the accreditation list required documents indicating their location and receive opportunities to experts if necessary, consultation.
III. Self assessment documents to be added to the (more) 17. additional information the applicant believes is important information on the higher education program to be accredited. More information can be added as a representative of the higher education program. More information will be published in high school or college website on the internet.
Minister of education and Science (B). the Rivž annex 3 Cabinet of 3 October 2006, regulations no 821 University or college and higher education program evaluation criteria i. high school or college assessment criteria 1. High school or college goals and objectives, clarity, accessibility, links with national objectives, the requirements of science, high school or college academic staff goals and objectives, student interests and needs.
2. Organization and management studies: 2.1. study, leisure and housing all the imatrikulēt student, help and advice for students, studying motivation, the opportunity to acquire the knowledge and skills outside the higher education programs;
2.2. student research activities as part of the learning process of the student scientific society, the student scientific paper competition, awards, bonuses, special scholarships;
2.3. international cooperation, exchanges and the use of guest speakers, academic staff and student exchange programs with other universities or colleges, students practice in Latvia and abroad.
3. High school or college academic staff: 3.1 high school or college academic staff qualifications in compliance with the statutory requirements;
3.2. research themes in actuality, research coordination and collaboration with scientific institutions in Latvia and abroad, high school or College Science employee involvement in the learning process.
4. High school or College of performance management and provisioning: 4.1 high school or college autonomy and democratic principles, involvement of students in high school or college life, academic staff in organizing the work of the internal quality control system, high school or College staff – academic and general-election and further training system;
4.2. the higher education requirements of the implementation of information systems, as well as logistical support and security with qualified personnel servicing;
4.3. high school or college tasks and long-term development plans required the existence of financial resources.
5. Quality assurance: 5.1 quality improvement system a continuous activity, long-term development plan and regular consultation;
5.2. high school or college graduate prospects in the labour market;
5.3. the continuation of study options and financial guarantees, if higher education program is eliminated, reorganized or other changes.
II. Higher education program evaluation criteria

6. Higher education program goals and objectives, their clarity, accessibility and verifiability.
7. the content and organisation of study: 7.1. compliance with the Latvian education and professional standards, other normative instruments and European Union requirements and recommendations;
7.2. the higher education programs and its coherence with the separate parts of Latvia and the common European education area requirements, including through a comparison of at least two Member States of the European Union study programmes;
7.3. academic staff qualifications and professionalism.
8. Presentation and evaluation of knowledge: 8.1. modern teaching methods, studies of the results expected clear presentation, problem solving, computer, multimedia and internet use;
8.2. help students, faculty, academic management consulting and studying motivation increases;
8.3. knowledge, skills and attitudes evaluation methods and use of the impartiality of the process of development.
9. Studio guarantee and management: 9.1. democratic principles in the management of higher education programs, clear the Administration representatives, academic staff and student relations;
9.2. cooperation with other universities or colleges, scientific institutions, international organizations, academic staff and student exchange with other universities;
9.3. the higher education program guide, information and logistical support.
10. the staff and students of scientific research (creative) business-academic staff and student involvement in research (creative) business, scientific research and topic relevance relevance to higher education programs content.
11. Quality assurance and warranties: 11.1 the annual higher education programs, the positive and negative characteristics, changes, development and planning consultation, internal self-assessment and quality improvement systems for continuous operation;
11.2. the higher education programs graduates successful installation work according to the speciality learned;
11.3. the continuation of study options and financial guarantees are eliminated or reorganized higher education program or other changes.
Minister of education and science Rivž in Annex B, 4, 5, 6 RAR