The Provisions On "operational Programme Human Resources And Employment" Apakšaktivitāt "appendix 1.2.1.2.2. Support For General Education Teachers For The Subjects Given Priority" For The Implementation Of

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Cilvēkresursi un nodarbinātība" papildinājuma 1.2.1.2.2.apakšaktivitātes "Atbalsts vispārējās izglītības pedagogu nodrošināšanai prioritārajos mācību priekšmetos" īstenošanas kārtību

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/171259

Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 71 in Riga 2008 February 5 (pr. 7. § 28) the provisions on "operational programme human resources and employment" apakšaktivitāt "Appendix 1.2.1.2.2. Support General educators for priority subjects" the Issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 (I).  General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme "human resources and activities in which the" Appendix 1.2. priorities of the education and skills "based" Pro fesionāl UR1.2.1.pas education and overall skill development "activities" Vis 1.2.1.2. General knowledge and skills enhancement ". apakšaktivitāt" support 1.2.1.2.2 vis general education teacher for priority subjects "(there can-apakšaktivitāt);
1.2. the project of the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) into the application of criteria for Dad;
1.3. the requirements of the project applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competence between these institutions and cooperation arrangements, as well as cooperation between the responsible authorities and institutions subordinated to the functional form of the sausage. 2. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt is to assign priority mērķstipendij subject of gog, ped to provide general education establishments and in the synergies of fesi Pro professional development in institutions with the necessary training methods of the priority before educators and encourage educators to educational institutions, thus following the General employees to improving the quality of education and ensuring student sa ga support studying science and technology programs. 3. for the purposes of the following provisions, that is, where the mērķstipendij scholarship in training for priority meta concerned educators study programme by the apg on the horse, vanity does ba or creative work. 4. In these regulations, the said priority subjects are: 4.1 physics;
4.2 chemistry;
4.3. Biology;
4.4. Science;
4.5. mathematics;
4.6. data processing;
4.7. foreign language (one of the European Union or the European economic area, the official languages-English, Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, French, Greek, Dutch, Hungarian, Italian, Irish, Icelandic, Lithuanian, Maltese, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish or Swedish va ball). 5. Apakšaktivitāt the purpose of the implementation of this provision reaches 10, paragraph activities and promoting this outcome indicator-2400 general priority subjects for educators who have received mērķstipendij. 6. Apakšaktivitāt exercise in accordance with these rules, laws, Oh those that govern the management of the structural funds of the European Union, implementation and supervision of real programming and regulations. 7. Apakšaktivitāt implement the project application to the limited selection. 8. funding is available for Apakšaktivitāt 11244864 lats, including European Social Fund co-financing 9558134 dollars, and the national financial budget volume 1686730. 9. Maximum co-financing from the European Social Fund around the Mayor is 85 percent of the total eligible project cost totals. 10. the action to be supported Apakšaktivitāt project has the objective of providing the grant rules stipen 11. referred to educators. 11. Mērķstipendij is granted to teachers: 11.1. which general education institutions 7-12 classroom or vocational institution glītīb Iza teaches priority subjects or items at least 12 Kona trail an hour a week and learn the priority subject or object of the professional qualifications of teachers in the appropriate courses.
11.2. who has acquired a specific priority subjects or objects of dagog pet professional qualifications relevant courses, taught a priori Tara subject or subjects other education establishments vis 7-12 classroom or vocational training establishment at least nine kontaktstund a week and extra work for the four referred to in paragraph 73. 12. the functions of the authority responsible for the management of the activities below, implementation and monitoring of the implementation made by the Ministry of education and science. Collaboration function is performed by the des national educational development agency. 13. the responsible authority shall have the following functions: ensuring project submission 13.1. selection and evaluation of: 13.1.1. develop project application form, project submissions valued knowledge and project submission form for the evaluation of the methodology;
13.1.2. create project submission Evaluation Commission;
13.1.3. assess the project submissions and decide on project ie sn-gum, approval approval with conditions or rejection, as well as pass rate decision on approval of the application, the project on condition of the sacījum;
13.2. to prepare the approved project the necessary State budget request dzekļ Lee;
13.3. collect information about application of the draft law in the order;
13.4. the provisions referred to in paragraph 76 of the draft amendment;
13.5. to plan and implement information measures about apakšaktivitāt's true infrastructure;
13.6. to ensure that these rules are not exceeded, paragraph 8 to go bag of true apakšaktivitāt infrastructure funding, and monitor the available Here European Social Fund funding, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the implementation of the principle referred to in the bottom level of the activity. 14. the cooperation body has the following features: 14.1. in cooperation with the authority to develop standartvienošan project for the implementation of a project;
14.2. to conclude an agreement with the beneficiary of the financing for the implementation of a project and of the project say the requirements of the beneficiaries in accordance with the following sentence;
14.3. to ensure project monitoring and control, including verification of the project and monitor the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the implementation of the project;

14.4. to provide information to the authority responsible for the State budget to the implementation of the projects require;
14.5. to examine the funding requested procurement plan and submit it to the Iepir Kuma monitoring Bureau;
14.6. to prepare and submit information to the authority responsible for the implementation of a project and for learning available funding;
14.7. to prepare the project payment projections and to submit it to payment institutions, the objective, the managing authority and the responsible authority;
14.8. to check and approve the beneficiary's payment was requested by the scope and prepare the Declaration of expenditure;
14.9. to provide information about the recipient of the funding agreements made conditions;
14.10. to accumulate data on project implementation to the laws prescribed in its loving;
14.11. to plan and implement public awareness measures on the conclusion of the vie nošano by the beneficiary. 15. the cooperation body is the functional supervision of the responsible authority. II. Requirements for the project applicant Project applicant has 16 public administration institution that implements the STU dent not vie the lending policy of the country and provides courses and student of DITA in the equestrian kr system operation and development. 17. the project applicant project implemented in Latvia to sa with verb and Republic urban district education authorities. Riga Pro project is implemented in cooperation with the local authorities, in the exercise of administrative functions of education and vocational training administration (educational administration). After Admiral nisi tratīv complete territorial reform project implemented in cooperation with counselling tions that have taken over the functions of education authorities. 18. in order to implement the project, the project, the applicant concluded a cooperation agreement with the education authorities, or municipalities, which are subordinated to the Board of education. 19. The project according to the entire bottom of the available finances you activity. III. submission of Project selection procedures 20. the responsible authority shall send the invitation to the Pro Ject applicant to submit project application (hereinafter referred to as the notice) in accordance with the requirements of these regulations in the 16 kt project pun. 21. the invitation shall indicate the following: 21.1. the project submission deadline;
21.2. the application of the project site and order it for submission to the Peruvian sonīg, sent by post or electronically;
21.3. the address of the Web site that published the project submission of documents used for bags and sagat. 22. the project applicant project application submitted, in accordance with the following fundamental rights: PRA 22.1. allowed to submit one project submission;
22.2. the project application form the completed project submission form (annex 1) and the following annexes: 22.2.1. educational administrations partnership participation in the project on the proof really is in infrastructure, which is consistent with the relevant authorities (annex 2);
22.2.2. the rules referred to in paragraph 18 of the standard contract of cooperation Pro Ject;
This provision 22.2.3.67. tripartite contract referred to in paragraph 1 between the pe dagog, the education management and project funding recipient project;
22.2.4. these rules 50.1. implementing the project referred to in the description of the lag lag;
22.2.5. draft questionnaire of the applicant on the value added of dokļ application in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for issuing and verifying the information on the application of value added tax to the European structural funds co-financed unit Sa project and take a decision on the inclusion of value added tax to the project-related costs;
22.2.6. project prepared by the applicant in the project financing plan Pro project (annex 3);
22.3. the project application to the institution of the applicant, the signature project of the va repetitive motion or its authorized person and the project is added to the application to the full varojum. 23. the applicant fills in the project the project submission form and present the project's submission, Pro, subject to the following requirements: 23.1. the project submission prepared into Latvian language and comply with all of the project behind the application form section;
23.2. the project of the copy of the application to fully comply with the submission of the project» I launched copy Ori;
23.3. the project application and copies the original is cauršūt (caurauklot), pages numbered, and all documents are presented according to the Lat wound Republic laws on recordkeeping;
23.4. the project submission form section, subsection and saukum projects, the applicant does not change and do not delete;
14.6. the project submission form section in the project by submitting a runny filling ensures the information provided cross-compliance-the project description high in tual, the UK identifying the problem and its solution, linking it with the project objectives, project activities in the notaj, the anticipated results, the selected target group put the provisions implementing the project and eligible costs plus shed;
14.7. the project content the project application, the applicant shall ensure that it is aware of this provision at paragraph 34 of the eligibility criteria and that the sentence referred to in paragraph 35 quality criteria;
23.7. the completion of the project the project application to the applicant the required Pro Ject costs according to the provisions in the plan, 49 and 59 points in relati ci nāmaj costs and limits, giving the project the cost justification for the FA in the notes and ensuring compliance with the objective of the project, planned activities and expected the Thai results. State budget financial volume project application intends only the eligible cost of the project. 24. the project applicant project application to the responsible body can go into to provide: 24.1. paper form in triplicate (one original copy marked "original" and two copies marked "copy") and in electronic form on the Alec change media-all documents placed in a package (envelope) and behind the seal;
24.2. the electronic document in the form of electronic documents act article 3, second and third subparagraphs. 25. paragraph 21 of these rules with the invitation in the specified project ie sn the submission deadline of the agreement end date is the last day when the project goes into the provider project application may be made personally or by sending by electronic mail: 25.1. If the project is submitted by sending by mail, on the date of submission of the application is the postmark shows the date of dispatch;

15.7. If projects are submitted electronically, as it is the time to see the time when it is sent by electronic mail or using the authorities held a special online form. In the event of a dispute, the head of the project had to prove that the application is sent before the draft paper, met the end of the sign. If the responsible authority submits that the application is taken, the sa this claim justified. 26. the responsible authority shall register the project application submitted to it on the date of receipt. Proof of receipt of the application, the project authority in charge of the Pro Ject to the applicant personally or within two weeks by post or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature). IV. evaluation of the application of draft article 27 as part of the Apakšaktivitāt project in the application submitted to the evaluation of the safety of this project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission). What the composition of the mission include the Ministry of education and science, the welfare of the three minis and regional development and the Ministry of local government representatives. 28. the meetings of the Commission as observers may participate in the managing authorities and the liaison body. The Commission may invite one or more tus * (without voting rights). 29. The Commission shall determine the responsible authorities developed and approved regulations. 30. the Commission assesses the project applicants and project submissions in response to this provision of Community referred to in paragraph 33 of the administrative criteria, listed in 34 knot kt and 35 eligibility criteria referred to in paragraph quality glamorous criterion was met. 31. The assessment shall be carried out, subject to the responsible authorities for the project developed the procedures for the evaluation of cold gum, the application of the project assessment and project appraisal form the tubers runny filling methodology, as well as other laws, Oh. 32. submission of project conformity to administrative criteria and eligibility criteria assessed by the "Yes" and "no" ("Yes", "no"-meets-does not meet). The project's compliance with the quality criteria assessed with a specific point of the scale. 33. Administrative criteria are as follows: 33.1. the project applicant is invited to submit a project application to the passenger bežot project application selection;
33.2. the project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the ter min;
33.3. the project is drawn up into the application;
33.4. a project proposal is prepared for the Latvian language;
33.5. the project proposal is prepared according to the rules referred to in paragraph 22.2. bottom project submission form, and all form sections are completed;
20.9. the project application has been submitted according to the requirements-in paper form (the required Pro Ject in the number of copies of the application) (one original and two certified by the pi's), the original and a copy of the application is cauršūt (caurauklot)) or an electronic document in the form of electro-electronic check document article 3 of the law in the second and third requirements laid down in part a, as well as all attached documents are formatted according to the specified requirements;
20.9. project application is signed by the project applicant institutions va repetitive motion or its authorised person;
21.0. project application is accompanied by all the provisions referred to in paragraph 22.2 below;
21.1. the period of project implementation and cost allocation over the years at "the rules referred to in paragraph 78 of the project implementation period;
33.10. project application requested to the European Social Fund financial volume and total eligible cost specified in lats;
33.11. the project required in the application of the European Social Fund to funding does not exceed the provisions mentioned in paragraph 9 of the allowable amount;
33.12. the project submission required in total eligible cost at "this provision the funding referred to in point 8 and limited to;
33.13. submission of project eligible costs over the years specified in the arithmetic of the Palace from the right and the budgeted amounts set out in the summary;
33.14. submission of project eligible costs specified in lines at 49. these provisions "and paragraph 59 in the eligible costs;
33.15. the project planned in the application costs do not exceed that rule 51, 54, 55, 57 and 58 of the costs referred to in paragraph 1. 34. eligibility criteria (projects of the applicant and this reply submission of the project criteria) are as follows: 34.1. the project applicant is that rule 16, paragraph institution;
21.3. the aim of the project comply with the rules referred to in paragraph 2, the provisions of the bottom dynamic purpose;
21.3. the project activities meet the supported this provision in paragraph 10th assisted transaction set;
21.4. the project involves mērķstipendij of the priority subjects for a set of go ped gam research or creative work or educators who learn the priority subject teacher's professional qualifications and working in education;
34.5. the project has been defined in the application and the issue of reasonable Iza cancer cheap target groups;
21.5. the application of the project and planned activities in the project provides predefined Pro problem solving and meeting the needs of target groups;
21.6. the project activities are clearly defined, proportionate with the expected real-ery time schedule and ensure the planned results;
21.6. the application of the project results and planned performance is explicit and measurable (reachable results are specified in units with specific values);
21.7. the project results and the planned figures support this rule 5. pu n kt yield referred to in the table of contents;
34.10. the project is specified in the application for each district and the Palace of the Republic farm mērķstipendij available about territorial quotas calculated pro porcionāl in the administrative territory of the 2006/2007 school year, the number of learners I šajam general education 7-12 classes and Pro fesionāl education institutions;
34.11. in implementation of the project as cooperation partners are involved in district and city authorities of the Republic education management;
34.12. project a common teacher selection and mērķstipendij to the application of the provisions of divorce in all planning regions;
34.13. the applicant undertakes the project project implementation to avoid dis kriminācij (gender, race, ethnic origin, religion, disability and other factors);

34.14. project application describes the project management and supervisory sis theme and it required resources (in the number of staff involved, qualifications and responsibilities, the available material and technical base), and they are demanding the protection of the project;
application project 34.15 is justified, as it will ensure the sustainability of the achieved re Zulu and high maintenance after completion of the project;
34.16. project costs indicated in the application corresponds to the implementation period of the project Pro, they are necessary and reasonable to achieve the project objectives and the implementation of the planned activities;
34.17. project planned publicity and dissemination of information in passport Kumi meets European Union funds projects in public to high requirements. 35. the quality criteria (specific horizontal priorities and eligibility criteria) are the following: 21.8. the project in the application of the priority subjects of the mērķstipendij ped Gogh conditions: 35.1.1., not specified in any way will be provided at the class mērķstipendij (0);
35.1.2. mērķstipendij conditions are not clearly defined or tell the da, the selection process is not intended to involve the district and city of the Republic of glītīb management (one point);
35.1.3. mērķstipendij awarded the selection procedure, the selection of sa cījum are formulated, the selection process is not intended to involve all the districts and towns of the Republic ordered the education administration (two points);
35.1.4. mērķstipendij awarded the selection procedure, the selection of the sacījum are defined in a clear and understandable, the selection process is designed to involve all the district and city of the Republic of education administration (three points);
35.2. District and Republican city administrations of educational involvement in project implementation in vitāš legislation, including the teacher's task execution and quality assessment: 35.2.1. as partners are involved in less than 50% of the district and city of the Republic education administrations, and only a fraction of them have submitted proof of membership of the partnership in the implementation of the project (one point);
35.2.2. as partners are involved in no less than 50% of the district and city of the Republic education administrations, and they make a circle about the cinājum partnership participation in the project (two points);
35.2.3. as partners are involved no less than 80% of the district and city public education re the administrations, and they have submitted proof of membership of the partnership for the project (three points);
35.2.4. as partners are involved in all the districts and towns of the Republic in education administration, and all of them have submitted proof of membership of the partnership for the project (four points);
35.3. projected effects of the project to send educators at sais priority subjects teaching: 35.3.1. the project involves the same award for "mērķstipendij away all our priority subject teachers regardless of their contact hours of priority subject teaching (one point);
35.3.2. differentiated approach to project involves the granting of prio mērķstipendij ri Tara support providing educators who gets priority subject teacher's professional qualifications and working in education, and educators who are more kontaktstund priority subjects (three points);
35.4. the project risk assessments: project submission not 35.4.1. assess potential risks (0);
35.4.2. project risk assessment in the application are incomplete, the action plan identified risks are not developed or are not completely developed (one point);
35.4.3. submission of the project risks are assessed in qualitative, Passover Kuma plans identified for the elimination or reduction of risk developed a stub (two points);
35.4.4. submission of the project risks are assessed in qualitative, it see it evaluated the possible incidence of costs, developed based on the passport plan will identify the risk measures for the elimination or reduction of (three points);
22.1. the specific measures to reduce occupational segregation and company in this context existing stereotypes of gender implications in the choice of profession: 35.5.1. not intended for (0);
35.5.2. are provided (two points);
35.6. impact on information society hori zontal priority: 35.6.1. the project provides building of the information society and development (0);
35.6.2. the project involves the building of the information society and the development of the following areas:-project-related activities are focused on opportunities to use information and communication technology solutions for the priority subject learning (two points). V. decision on approval of the project application, approval with conditions or disapproval 36. Responsible Authority project application is approved if all 33 and 34 of these rules referred to in paragraph project submission evaluation is valued by the company fell to the "Yes" and assessment of compliance with the rules referred to in paragraph 35 of the draft criteria of the quality of the application is received less than seven points. 37. the competent authority shall reject the application for the project and not evaluated further, if the application does not comply with any of these terms, 33.2, 33.3 33.1...,.,., 20.9 20.8 20.8 20.9.,.,.,., 33.10, 33.11 33.12 21.3 21.3 21.2.,.,.,.,., 21.7 21.4 34.10 or 34.11.34.13. criteria referred to in paragraph. 38. the responsible authority shall reject the application for the project and, if not further assessed in compliance with the dad you into one of these rules, or 22.0 21.8 21.9. in selected project in the application mentioned quality criteria received less than two points. 39. the competent authority may approve the application, the project on condition that the project, the applicant shall ensure compliance with this provision, 21.1 21.0.,.,., 33.14 33.13 33.15.,.,., 21.6 21.4 21.5 21.6.,.,.,., 34.15 34.12 34.14, or 34.17.34.16. criteria referred to in point. 40. the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided may include the following conditions: 24.9. additional information or clarification of the submission;
40.2. the required attachment to;
40.3. clarification of the eligible cost;

25.1. the appropriate steps to ensure that the project submission complies with these rules, 21.1 21.0.,.,., 33.14 33.13 33.15.,.,., 21.6 21.4 21.5 21.6.,.,.,., 34.15 34.12 34.14, or 34.17.34.16. criteria referred to in point. 41. If the rules referred to in paragraph 40 the conditions affect any other provision, these 34 33 and 35 points in the evaluation criteria listed in the eligibility assessment, the responsible authority decision on the approval of the application, the project on condition can be supplemented with the appropriate instructions. 42. the responsible authority shall within five working days after the decision sent: 42.1. the project applicant-decision on application of the project around the Stipe of authorisations requested or project submission, or the rejection of an application for the approval of the project;
26.2. cooperation authority-the decision on the application of the project around the Stipe of authorisations requested and approved by two certified copies of the project or project submission, submitted an electronic document in the form of electronic documents act article 3, second and third subparagraphs. 43. If the application is approved, the head of the project had the time limit laid down in the decision (not to exceed 20 working days) provides the cījum off and submit to the authority responsible for the evaluation of the information of the sacījum. 44. the responsible authority shall assess the 20 working days in accordance with the provisions of 43 submissions and prepares opinions on the decision of the sacījum. 45. If the opinion is positive, the competent authority shall within five working days: 45.1. project-opinion on the decision to the applicant contains the conditions;
45.2. the cooperation body-a decision on project approval with no sacījum, opinion on the conditions contained in the decision and two copies of the approved project or project submission, submitted an electronic document in the form of electronic documents act article 3, second and third subparagraphs. 46. If the applicant does not provide the decision to the fulfilment of the conditions contained in these terms within the period referred to in paragraph 43 or 44 of these provisions the competent authorities referred to in the opinion is negative, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected, and the responsible authority within five working days, inform in writing the applicant of the project. 47. The liaison body with the beneficiary of the financing agreement on the switch of the project in accordance with the law establishing procedures for the structural funds and the European Union cohesion fund management in the participating institutions from secure programming documents for the preparation and implementation of these funds. 48. During the month following the submission of the draft decision, or the rejection of this provision 46. in the case referred to in paragraph, the applicant may require the project to the responsible authority of the law in order to issue the project submitted by the two copies of the application. Vi. Eligible and ineligible costs 49. Project eligible costs the following cost plan po zīc in the scheme: 30.5. project application and supporting documentation preparation costs;
30.6. the project administration costs;
49.3. in the implementation of project activities;
49. mērķstipendij this provision referred to in paragraph 11 educators;
30.8. public information and publicity costs;
30.8. unforeseen costs. 50. This rule 49.1. cost referred to in heading covers the following costs: 50.1. the implementation of the project information system technical documentation preparation costs;
50.2. a standard project development costs. 51. This rule 49.1. cost referred to in heading no over 0.1 percent of total gives the project's eligible costs. 52. This provision cost referred to in paragraph 30.6. position includes the following cost sas: 52.1. persons engaged in the administration of the project in consideration of a specific work or services;
52.2. the national employers ' compulsory social insurance contributions;
52.3. domestic travel and travel expenses;
52.4. Project administrative costs from the sa ska ņā says with a duly justified, fair and equitable method as tuāl or remain stable over a proportional share of the following funding the administrative costs of the beneficiary: 52.4.1. communication costs;
52.4.2. Office supplies costs;
52.4.3. rental and maintenance costs of premises (Alec trīb, heating and water supply);
52.5. project management and project activities required for the implementation of information technology equipment (hardware, software, printer and storage equipment) rental;
52.6. implementation of the project of information system development and maintenance costs. 53. The rules referred to in paragraph 30.6. cost position includes the following costs: 53.1. project activities involved in the implementation of the remuneration for work or services Crete contact (teacher selection process, the report submitted by the teacher and other tasks under a cooperation agreement with the applicant for the project);
53.2. national employers ' compulsory social insurance contributions;
53.3. domestic missions and travel expenses;

53.4. project carried out in the context of costs, management costs of premises (electricity, heating and water supply) and the cost of office supplies, which are determined according to a duly justified, fair and equitable me tod as a percentage or proportion of the activities involved in the implementation of the project educational management cost of communications services, the establishment of the joke room costs (electricity, heating and water supply) and the cost of office supplies. 54. This rule 30.6. as referred to in point cost position odd provides five percent of the total eligible costs of the project. 55. This rule 49.3. referred to cost position odd provides 10 percent of the total eligible costs of the project. 56. This provision cost referred to in subparagraph 49. position of objective scholarship award includes this provision in paragraph 11 that educators, and NASA mērķstipendij of vie do not exceed 150 Lats per month. Target scholarships cost sas is eligible from the date on which the relevant education authority is assisted by teachers transmit list that will get mērķstipendij. 57. This provision 30.8. referred to the cost of providing the odd position 0.5 percent of the total eligible costs of the project. 58. This provision not referred to 30.8. estimated costs for the implementation of the project Pro does not exceed 0.5% of the total eligible costs of the project and are used with the rules prescribed in paragraph 30.6. the related costs. 59. the non-recoverable value added tax payments are eligible. 60. Financing from the European Social Fund and State budget funds not eligible costs not specified in these rules and 59 49 point or does not comply with this rule 51, 54, 55, 57 and 58 of the above cost limit. Do not apply also to the cost of project activities during the implementation of the commitments, which does not accept payments made later than the month after the implementation deadline of the project or which are not motivated by the cost of the supporting documents. VII. conditions for implementing a project 61. The beneficiary provides a single educator scholarship award selection and objective application of the provisions of all the planning regions, each region and the city of the Republic establishing the volume of available financial mērķstipendij about-territorial quotas. This shall be determined by the rules in paragraph mērķstipendij of 49 below. costs planned means of dividing the Pro porcionāl in General, the number of trainees education 7-12 classes and Pro fesionāl education institutions in the administrative territory of the 2006/2007 school year. The number of Mērķstipendij is calculated using the following formula: n = N: K, where n-number of mērķstipendij the relevant administrative territory;
N-the number of learners in general education 7-12 classes and vocational training institutions in the administrative territory of the 2006/2007 school year;
K-average number of learners in general education 7-12 classrooms and vocational schools to one mērķstipendij. 62. After the completion of the administrative and territorial reform of territorial quotas for counties and cities of the Republic is calculated according to the provisions referred to in paragraph 61 of the formula. 63. The beneficiary administrations in cooperation with education each year at the end of the school year shall login mērķstipendij come home educators of the school year (2007/2008 school year logon mērķstipen opening by a grant from the project application approval). 64. the Board of education during the school year may invite repeated stranger with mērķstipendij teachers sign up, if not mastered the year target for the amount of scholarship, or to transfer the remaining funds to the construction of the 'tween years having submitted that the time limit for the implementation of the project. 65. The Education Department supports teacher testing on the target of the application constitutes a stipen and prepare to receive assisted educators mērķstipendij list, listing them in order of priority by the number of points earned, considering that the amount of mērķstipendij granted in one year may not exceed 50% of the total educational administration available concerned territorial quotas. 66. The educational administrations shall inform the educators on the application of the measures for the examination of the re within five working days from the date when it approved the list of eligible educators who receive mērķstipendij. 67. the Mērķstipendij shall be granted for one academic year. On the conclusion of the tripartite mērķstipendij the granting of the contract between the teacher, the Board of education over and the beneficiary of the financing. The contract determines the educator, in addition to the deliverables, mērķstipendij, as well as reimbursement on receipt of the sacījum. The dispute about the performance of the contract the general jurisdiction of the Court. 68. Mērķstipendij starting pay in the next calendar month after this provision in paragraph 67 of the tripartite contract is signed by all the parties, pursuant to the provisions referred to in paragraph 56 of the mērķstipendij cost incidence. 69. where the educator who is assigned to the mērķstipendij, end studies pe dagog of professional qualification or stop working, or educational institution is awarded more than 14 calendar days in the month, he will immediately inform the beneficiary of the financing and management of education concerned. Beneficiary, starting with the next month after learning of the suspension or termination, end mērķstipendij. If the teacher's inability to carry is essentially longer than 14 calendar days, the aim of the scholarship on this month without cost. 70. If the teacher has received a mērķstipendij after you have stopped Stu grant of teacher's professional qualifications or stopped working, or educational institution has been unable to work for more than 14 days in a calendar month, he released mērķstipendij unduly received the full amount of the light period. Mia The beneficiary is entitled to withhold amounts unduly paid mērķstipendij payments from next, where they are made. 71. the next school year a teacher can qualify for objective scholarship. Mērķstipendij educator can receive no more than three years-total not exceeding 30 months. 72. The Education Department allocated in mērķstipendij in order of priority and extent: these provisions 72.1.11.1. the teacher referred to-100 Lats per month;

72.2. this rule 11.2. the teacher referred to-150 Lats per month if it teaches priority subjects or articles 21 or more kontaktstund of the week;
72.3. this rule 11.2. the referred teacher-from 65 to 150 Lats per month if it teaches from 9 to 21 for the week kontaktstund of the priority subjects or objects. Mērķstipendij the amount of the calculated in proportion to the number of kontaktstund week, priority support to educators who have a greater number of kontaktstund week. 73. the teacher's research or creative work tasks: 73.1. mandatory tasks: 73.1.1. guide work (subject teaching me todik accessible, including test development, or new training dzekļ the approval of Lee's educational institution, or the use of information technology to improve the priority subjects of learning);
73.1.2. consultative work (thematic consultations learners 'tween, motivation training curriculum improvement and measures of achievement or ganizēšan to promote the interests of the learners about the training methods, and the front of the pedagogical expertise of the subject of gog or ped methodological advice for new teachers);
73.1.3. awareness raising on equal opportunities in education and careers and the reduction of gender stereotypes influence the choice of the profession in relation to the priority subjects progression;
73.2. Optional things to do: 73.2.1. research work in pedagogy (education science);
73.2.2. student research activities management priority subjects;
73.2.3. practice driving prospective educators. 74. The beneficiary in its homepage on the internet at least once every three months puts up-to-date information on the implementation of the project. 75. the amendments to the project is carried out in accordance with the laws and regulations that govern the European Union fund management, implementation and monitoring of the implementation of these provisions, with the exception in paragraph 76. 76. The beneficiaries of the project amendments before submitting the institution submitted to the coordination of cooperation in the responsible authority, if the changes are related to: 76.1. project objectives;
76.2. change of the beneficiary;
76.3. project start and end date;
76.4. sample output of the project indicators;
76.5. project total eligible costs or their distribution over the years;
47.6. the reallocation of costs not provided for. 77. This provision up to 54, 55 and 57 of those relati cost cinām limits, the beneficiary can perform redistribution of project pass fees this provision, and 30.7 30.6 30.6.. cost referred to under heading, up to 10 percent of the cost of the reallocated positions total eligible costs and providing cooperation institution in the payment request for an explanation of the cost distribution. VIII. Closing questions 78. Project implementation duration does not exceed four years from the date of the agreement for the implementation of a project, but not later than 31 December 2013. 79. the competent authority, liaison body and the project funding recipient project implementation stores all documents (originals) to December 31, 2021. Prime Minister i. Godmanis, Minister of education and science t. koķe Ministry of education and science of the presented version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 5 February 2008. Regulations No 71, Minister of education and science t. koķe annex 2 Cabinet-February 5, 2008, regulations No 71, Minister of education and science t. koķe annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 5 February 2008. Regulations No 71, Minister of education and science t. koķe