Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 279 in Riga in 2008 (April 15. No 24 36) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 15 January 2008 No 28 "provisions of the rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix." social activity 3.4.4.2 residential home improvement measures "siltumnoturīb" Issued in accordance with the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do cabinet 15 January 2008 No. 28 "provisions of the rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix." social activity 3.4.4.2 residential improvement measures "siltumnoturīb" (Latvian journal , 2008, no. 10) the following amendments: 1. Replace the words "in paragraph 6.3 with the responsible authorities" with the words "with authority" of cooperation. 2. Make the following paragraph 7.17.: "7.17. to provide the public with information and to provide publicity on matters related to the implementation of the activity and the activity within the projects approved;". 3. Replace paragraph 9, the words "local authorities" with the words "local authorities". 4. Make the introductory part of point 13.1 the following: "13.1. project documentation preparation and monitoring of the project's cost, not exceeding 10% of the total eligible direct project costs (project direct eligible costs referred to in that rule 13.1, 13.2 and 13.3 in):" 5. the express 13.6 paragraph by the following: "13.6 contingencies not more than 5% of the total eligible direct cost amount." 6. Express section 14.1. by the following: "based on purchasing 14.1 required application supporting project documentation preparation or implementation of the project and is carried out in accordance with the public procurement law;". 7. Delete paragraph 26. 8. Supplement 28.3. subparagraph after the word "signature" with the words "individually". 9. Supplement with 35.1 35.2 35.3 35.4, 35.5,,,,, and 22.2 22.2 22.1 points as follows: "application of project compliance with 21.8 project application administration and eligibility assessment criteria is assessed by" Yes "or" no "(" Yes "," no "-meets-does not meet). The conformity of the project the project application submission quality evaluation criteria evaluated by assigning a specific number of points. Project submission compliance is assessed on the basis of these provisions referred to in annex 5, project submission evaluation criteria and with the project application selection and evaluation procedures, as well as application forms, assessment provided in the laws of the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds and the European Union fund management and control system. 35.2 If there is no information in the project application in order to assess compliance of the application for the project to one or more of the evaluation criteria, or where such information is not legible or not Latvian languages, believes that the project submission does not meet the criterion or criteria concerned given lower rating. 35.3 project submissions are judged by the following evaluation criteria (annex 5): 35.31. quality criteria-residencies for renovation or reconstruction work, as well as other additional measures required for building the technical advancement of the implementation of the resulting thermal energy savings as a percentage of the current heat consumption-for each savings interest is awarded one point; 35.32. horizontal priority criteria: 35.32.1. of the balanced development of the territory-the project area development index project application deadlines at the time; 35.32.2. equal opportunities-project specific activities provided for equal treatment, especially by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities; 35.33. eligibility criteria: 35.33.1. project eligibility criteria: 35.33.1.1. project application used currency is the lats; 35.33.1.2. the cost of the project (the total eligible costs of the project, not the total eligible costs of the project and the total cost of the project) project cost estimates are calculated arithmetic correctly; 35.33.1.3. the eligible costs of the project comply with the eligible costs laid down; 35.33.1.4. the requested funding is calculated correctly; 35.33.1.5. application of the project planned activities, expected results and indicators are clearly defined, reasonable, measurable, according to the time schedule for implementation of the project, as well as the focus on the achievement of the project objectives and target groups needs are met; 3.1.6. the expenditure is proportionate to 35.3, economically justified, necessary for the implementation of the project and provides a physically measurable results; 35.33.1.7. social residential home energy audit has been carried out, and there is a building energy audit report in accordance with the provisions of annex 1; 35.33.1.8. project application deadlines in a municipality shall submit an application for one social residential house; 35.33.2. project eligibility criteria of the applicant: the applicant is 35.33.2.1. project authorities; 35.33.2.2. the municipality under the Central Administration of statistics collected data is a residential home that until 1 July 2007, with the decision of the local government is defined in the social status of the dwelling; 35.33.2.3. Social House is rented at least 90% of housing to persons established in the municipal assistance housing solutions; 35.33.2.4. during the period from 2002 to the municipality concerned the social Web needs not allocated public funds public investment programme; 35.34. administrative criteria: 35.34.1. the project has the original application document legal force; 35.34.2. project application is filed within the time limit laid down; 35.34.3. the project is drawn up into the application; 35.34.4. a project proposal is prepared and submitted to the Latvian language; 35.34.5. a project proposal is prepared and filled in according to the project application form requirements have been added to all the additional documents to be submitted, and they are designed according to the laws of the Republic of Latvia; 35.34.6. project application form is completely filled; 35.34.7. the project is not specified in the application for revision-deletion, aizkrāsojum, deletion or addition; 35.34.8. the final report of the project deadline is no later than 24 months after the date of conclusion of the contract; 35.34.9. a project proposal is submitted in two copies-one original and one copy (if the application is submitted in paper form). 22.0 evaluation, starting first project submissions valued in compliance with the rules referred to in subparagraph 35.34.2. evaluation criteria. Evaluation after other administrative criteria, eligibility criteria and priorities of the quality criteria of the horizontal continues only if not identified non-compliance with the rules referred to in subparagraph 35.34.2. evaluation criteria. " 35.5 If the project submission complies with these regulations. the evaluation referred to in paragraph 35.34.2 of the criterion (no reservation), valued project compliance with this provision of the application 35.33.1.7, 35.33.1.8., 35.33.2.1., 35.33.2.2., 35.33.2.3., 35.33.2.4. and 35.34.1. do not be referred to the administrative and eligibility criteria. If the application does not meet any of the compliance and refine, not administrative criteria, submission of the project evaluation after the other criteria do not continue. If the application meets all the refine, not administrative and eligibility criteria, assessed the adequacy of the project application, this provision, 35.32.1. and 35.32.2.35.31. quality and referred to the horizontal priority criteria. the first project submissions 35.6 selection round of tenders submitted submissions, which have been measured in accordance with the provisions of the conditions of paragraph 22.1, and received at least 20 points this 35.31. the provisions referred to in subparagraph evaluation criteria continue to rate after others refine, compliance and administrative criteria. the first project submissions 35.7 selection round of project submissions filed by the Commission shall have the right to be judged, and the Manager is the liaison bodies entitled to adopt a decision on project approval, the approval or rejection of the conditions before the project application submission deadline. 22.2 the second and subsequent project application selection rounds submitted project applications, which have been measured in accordance with the provisions of the conditions of paragraph 22.1, ranked in descending order of quality and horizontal priority criteria score obtained. After the others refine, compliance and administrative criteria continue to rate only the project submissions that the project application selection round within the received enough points to get the funding. " 10. Put 36 as follows: "36. Second and subsequent project application selection rounds decision on approval of the application, the project adopted if all the following conditions are met: 36.1. the project submission complies with these rules and 35.33 35.34. referred to evaluation criteria; 36.2. the project submission under this provision referred to 35.31. evaluation criteria received a rating of not less than 20 points; 36.3. the project announced in the invitation the application round of funding has received the highest rating, comparing project submissions according to the points obtained in accordance with this provision, 35.32.1. and 35.32.2.35.31. referred to the assessment criteria. If multiple project submissions receive the same number of points, taking a decision on the application for the approval of projects, priority is given to the submission of the draft with a higher heat savings as a percentage of the current heat consumption. If multiple project submissions is the same heat savings as a percentage of the current heat consumption, preference shall be given to the application of the project with a lower index of the development of the territory. " 11. Supplement with 36.1 points as follows: "the first project submissions 36.1 selection decision on approval of the application, the project adopted if all the following conditions are met: 36.11. the project submission complies with 35.33. and referred to 35.34. evaluation criteria; 36.12. project submissions under this provision referred to 35.31. evaluation criteria received a rating of not less than 20 points. " 12. Express 37 as follows: "37 application. the decision on the rejection of a project is accepted if at least one of the following conditions: 37.1. the project submission does not comply with (one or more) of these rules, 35.33.1.8., 35.3 3.1.7., 35.33.2.2., 35.33.2.1., 35.33.2.4., 35.33.2.3. and 35.34.2.35.34.1 referred to the assessment criteria; 37.2. the project submission under this provision referred to 35.31. evaluation criteria received a rating of less than 20 points; 37.3. list of project submissions according to the points obtained in accordance with this provision, and 2.1 35.31 35.3 35.3 2.2. evaluation criteria referred to in the application, the project has received the least number of points and advertised selection round of funding within it does not have enough features (does not apply to project submissions, filed the first application round project). " 13. Express 38.1 and 38.2. subparagraph such.: "to specify a project's application 38.1. According to the evaluation criteria, except for this provision, 35.32.35.33.1.7 35.31.,., 35.33.1.8., 35.33.2., 35.34.1. and 35.34.2. assessment criteria referred to in (a); 23.7. to clarify the application of the project cost estimate, in the case of the arithmetic calculation errors. Making revisions, the total eligible cost, volume and intensity of financing cannot increase; ". 14. Make the following paragraph version 24.0:24.0. Design a project application under the provisions of paragraph 27 or 28 requirements. " 15. Supplement with 38.1 points as follows: "the decision on the application of the project 23.7 the approval with the conditions of the cooperation body indicates the project the applicant requested additional or clarifying the information referred to in paragraph 38 of these rules, and the time limit within which the information is to be submitted. After the submission of the information quality criteria of assessment is not changed. " 16. paragraph 39 of the following expression: ' 39. cooperation authority determines the terms contained in the decision deadline. The due date is not longer than three calendar months from the date of dispatch of the decision. Information about the decision the conditions contained in the project the applicant shall submit to the liaison body for assessment. The liaison body shall assess the information submitted by the applicant for the project and prepares opinion on its compliance with the terms of the decision. If the applicant does not provide the draft decision contained in the conditions or the conditions are not met the time limit expires, the application of the project is considered to have been rejected. Opinion on the decision of the non-compliance with conditions of cooperation authority within five working days from the date of signature of the applicant must be forwarded. In the opinion of Justice assessed simultaneously with the decision taken by the evaluation of the rule of law. " 17. Replace paragraph 44, the word "contributions" with the word "released". 18. Amend section 7.3 of annex 3. 19. Annex 5 shall be expressed as follows: "annex 5 cabinet 15 January 2008 regulations No 28 Project submission evaluation criteria i. criteria of quality evaluation system of points 1. Residencies for renovation or reconstruction work, as well as other additional measures required for building the technical advancement of the implementation of the resulting thermal energy savings as a percentage of the current heat consumption-for each savings interest is awarded 1 point. If saving is 40% and more, give the maximum rating-40 points 0-40 II. Horizontal priority criteria ranking system score 2. Project implementation area development index project application deadlines at the time: 0-5 greater than 0 0 from 0 to-2 from 0.499-to-4 from-0.500 0.899 0.900 and less Or project designed for 5 3. specific activities the principle of equal opportunities for , particularly by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities?
0-2 is not designed for specific Project activities to ensure equal opportunities are provided for in the draft 0 specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities 2 III. eligibility criteria A. Project eligibility criteria ranking system Yes/No 4. submission of the project used currency is the lats 5. Project cost (the total eligible costs of the project, not the total eligible costs of the project and the total cost of the project) project cost estimates are calculated arithmetic correctly 6. eligible costs of the project comply with the provisions of the Cabinet of Ministers mentioned the types of eligible expenditure 7. the requested funding is calculated properly 8.
Application of the project planned activities, expected results and indicators are clearly defined, reasonable, measurable, according to project implementation time schedule and focus on the achievement of the objective of the project, the target group needs 9. expenditure is proportionate, commercially reasonable, necessary for the implementation of the project and provide a result (physically measurable) generation 10. Social residential home energy audit has been carried out, and there is a building energy audit report in accordance with the provisions of annex 1 11. deadlines submission of projects in the municipality shall submit an application for one social residential house


B. PROJECT applicant eligibility criteria ranking system Yes/No 12. Project applicant is municipality 13. Municipality under the Central Administration of statistics collected data is a residential home that until 1 July 2007, with the decision of the local government is defined in the social status of the dwelling house has 14 social rented housing at least 90% of persons registered in the municipality for assistance in solving the housing issue 15. During the period from 2002 to the municipality concerned the social Web needs not allocated public funds public investment programme IV. Administrative criteria ranking system

Yes/No 16. application the original Project is the document legal force 17 project submission is submitted within 18. project application is drawn up into 19. project proposal is prepared and submitted to the Latvian language 20. a project proposal is prepared and filled in according to the project requirements and the application form are attached to all the additional documents to be submitted, and they are designed according to the laws of the Republic of Latvia of 21 Projects for requirements submission form is completely filled in application of the project No 22 not specified corrections – deletions , aizkrāsojum, deletion or addition of project closing 23. submission of the report is not later than 24 months after the date of conclusion of the contract for project submission is 24 filed two copies-one original and one copy (if the application is submitted in paper form) "Prime Minister i. Godmanis economic Minister k. Gerhard