Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 329 in Riga, 13 May 2008 (pr. No 30 7) amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of 4 December 2007 the provisions of the "rules on no 836 operational programme ' infrastructure and services ' activity ' water management 3.5.1.1. infrastructure development with the human equivalent of agglomerations greater than 2000" issued under the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 do cabinet 4 December 2007 rules no. 836 "rules on" operational programme infrastructure and services "3.5.1.1. activity" water management infrastructure development with the human equivalent of agglomerations greater than 2000 "(Latvian journal , 2007, nr. 205.) the following amendments: 1. provisions of title be expressed as follows: "the provisions on" operational programme infrastructure and services "Appendix" for water activity 3.5.1.1. infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000 ". 2. Supplement with 6.1 points by the following: "6.1 the activity exercised limited project application selection." 3. To make point 7 by the following: "7. the competent authority is the Ministry of the environment. Ministry of the environment provides all its functions, as well as not to exceed the prescribed activity of these rules available for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund funding, and monitor the available funding under the Cohesion Fund, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level by controlling the project financial plan. " 4. Make the following point 12: ' 12. Cohesion Fund projects, the applicant – beneficiaries – can only be water management in the public service, local authorities, local government bodies and agencies, as well as corporations that contracted with the local governing water management public service obligation, the duration of the service provision area, the calculation of the compensatory payment terms and other conditions. " 5. Delete and 17.4 17.3... 6. Delete paragraph 18. 7. Delete subparagraph 29.10 29.11., and.. 8. Put the following section 30.18.: 30.18. project risk assessment, including assessing the potential cost growth; ". 9. Add to subparagraph 30.18.1 of the rules with the following wording: "30.18.1 is made in the application of the project alternatives analysis and economic analysis of the project;". 10. Express section 30.19. following: 30.19. cost of return "indicators (population, which as a result of the implementation of the project will improve the water quality of service and ensure their availability/initial total cost ($)). The average project selection round score that is calculated in relation to projects that meet the eligibility and administrative criteria (cost of return indicators amount/round project number); ". 11. Add to subparagraph 30.19.1 of the rules with the following wording: "30.19.1 water management system (or the infrastructure to be compensated) sustainable use;". 12. Express the following subparagraphs 33.2.: "33.2. giving each project a certain number of points and setting up the priority list of projects in relation to the evaluation criteria listed in that provision, 30.17, 30.16..., 30.18.1, 30.18 30.19, 30.20. and 30.19.1., 30.21 in. Project priority list is used, if available for the implementation of the activity funding will be insufficient to implement all planned projects. " 13. To supplement the rules by 39.1 39.2 and 39.3 points, as follows: "the Evaluation Commission evaluated 24.3 decision on approval of the application, the project provided the conditions contained in the execution, and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on the decisions contained in the conditional execution of 20 working days after the rule laid down in paragraph 37. 39.2 If the condition is not met within the time limit laid down in the decision approving the project submission, or this provision, paragraph 35 of the responsible authority opinion is negative, the project application to the Cohesion Fund shall be deemed to have been rejected. opinion which is 39.3 found that the applicant has not fulfilled the conditions contained in the decision, the responsible authority within two working days, send to the project applicant. In the opinion of Justice control is done just like the decision, which includes the control of execution of the conditions in this opinion is drawn up. " 14. Make the following paragraph in 40.2: ' 40.2. the decision on the application of the Cohesion Fund project approval conditions specified in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 37. 37. This provision of the conditions referred to in paragraph due date may not be more than three months; ". 15. Express 41, 42 and 43, as follows: "41. If the estimated contract price depending on the beneficiary's legal status: 25.5. is less about public procurement contract price the contract price limits or boundaries that apply to public service supply, service and works contracts, procurement procedures carried out by the beneficiaries. 1. project group cohesion fund projects procurement procedure can also be performed under the cohesion fund the project applicant, prior to a decision on the application of cohesion fund projects. In this case, before launching a procurement procedure, the cohesion fund the project, the applicant submitted to the responsible body of the purchase plan by the responsible authority and the procurement monitoring Bureau will be dealt with in accordance with the order in which the European Union fund management institutions involved in supporting the preparation of programming documents and the introduction of European Union funds, including procurement documentation and procurement procedures for random pre-verification; 41.2. is equal to public procurement contract price the contract price limits or boundaries that apply to public service supply, service and works contracts, or more than those of the procurement procedure, carry out the Ministry of the environment. 42. the competent authority of the Ministry of the environment website on the internet (www.vidm.gov.lv) publishes guidelines for procurement and procurement documents. Procurement project, the applicant may begin only after the purchase guidelines and standard procurement procedures document publishing. 43. the first procurement procedure must be issued no later than three months from the submission of the project under the Cohesion Fund approval. " 16. Delete paragraph 44 and 45. 17. Make 46 as follows: "46. If the beneficiary or the cohesion fund projects, the applicant does not comply with the procurement regulatory requirements or the laws that rule 41 of the type referred to in paragraph 1, the cost of such contracts signed, considered not eligible under the cohesion fund the project costs. " 18.50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 and 56 points. 19. Chapter XII be expressed as follows: "XII. Closing questions 66.2. These rules referred to in annex 1 and 2 list the project group shall be specified in the until 1 October 2008. 67. purchasing guidelines and procurement documents the responsible authority of the Ministry of the environment website on the internet published by 30 May 2008. 68. This rule 41.1. subparagraph shall enter into force on 30 May 2008. 69. This provision of the annex 3 section 8 "affirmation" stated that the water supply and wastewater management infrastructure that require water management public service belongs to the project the applicant, does not apply to 1. project group cohesion fund projects applicant (annex 2 to these rules). 70. If the beneficiary is the charterer, who leased the infrastructure assets that are necessary for water public service according to the local authorities and corporations concluded Treaty on water management public service project under the cohesion fund the Cohesion Fund in the territory, the project will create the infrastructure asset owner is a renter. In this case the civil contract for the Cohesion Fund project implementation the responsible authority, switch the beneficiary and the renter. The agreement provides that the civil law: 70.1. lessor shall ensure implementation of the cohesion fund projects for co-financing; 70.2. the beneficiary during the month of completion of the project under the Cohesion Fund is transferred to the lessor of the cohesion fund the project infrastructure caused by renter assets transferred the lease to the beneficiaries; 70.3. lessor shall ensure the implementation of the functions of the beneficiaries, if their project under the Cohesion Fund, as well as during the five years after its completion, failing to ensure beneficiaries; 43.7. the lessor shall repay the cohesion fund the project not undertaken appropriate expenses if the cohesion fund the project not undertaken the corresponding expenditure fails to repay beneficiaries. " 20. Supplement to annex 1, point 2.1.3 as follows: "2.1.3. the appropriate nominal discount rate, if the analysis is conducted according to the actual prices;". 21. Amend Annex 3 of the "attachments" section 10, 11 and 12. 22. the supplement to annex 3 paragraph 1.1.6. table "Project applicant type (please tick the appropriate)" with the following lines: "I-29 partnership" 23. Express 2.5. Annex 3 paragraph by the following: "2.5. provide a description of the selected solution ([reference documentation with an alternate solution, no more than 1000 characters]): 2.5.1. Description of the Solution: problem solution the water quality sewage collection quality wastewater treatment quality water services for sewage collection services. the project Evaluated the 2.5.2 implementation risks ([no more than 1000 characters]) 2.5.3. the alternative Assessment: solutions ([no more than 1000 characters]): "24. Express 3.7.3.3. subparagraph by the following:" 7.3.3. Cohesion Fund contribution calculation calculation 1 DA = EC × R, where DA is the expected amount of the decision which is the subject of an "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix "to the activity of water management 3.5.1.1. infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000" "maximum cohesion fund co-financing rate or large project this is the amount to which the co-financing rate for the priority axis applies; ECU's contribution to the eligible costs; R is the rate of deficit financing. 2. the calculation of the contribution of the Cohesion Fund = DA × Max Max CRp which CRp is "operational programme infrastructure and services" Appendix "to the activity of water management 3.5.1.1. infrastructure development with the human equivalent of the agglomerations of more than 2000" "maximum cohesion fund co-financing rate (85%) or large projects, the maximum the co-financing rate for the priority axis, specified in the Commission decision approving the operational programme.

Contribution to total eligible cost (LVL) funding gap rate (%) for the project
Max CRp decision amount (LCY) cohesion fund contribution (%)
The Cohesion Fund contribution (LVL) 1 2 3 4 = 1 × 2 5 = 6:1 6 = 4 × 3 "25. Express 3.7.3.4. subparagraph by the following:" 7.3.4. Public co-financing calculation (eligible costs) 7.3.4.1. Calculates the project funding deficit rate (PFDL) PFDL = 85%, the estimated contribution of the Cohesion Fund (as a percentage of the total eligible cost of the investment) 7.3.4.2. determine the financial capacity of the applicant project pointers no pointer value 1. Municipality and the project applicant (if it is not a municipality) credit to the moment of the preparation of the application (LVL date of information) 2. total planned authorities and the applicant of the project (if it is not a municipality) credit the amount against direct revenue, taking into account existing commitments and of the projects indicated in the application (%) 2.1. the commencement of project implementation year (year n) 2.2 in year n + 1 year n + 2 2.3 2.4. medium three years (((2.1) + (2.2.) + (2.3)): 3) 3. Financial stability calculation-15% (2.4).

4. financial capacity indicator (FKR) If (3) > 0 = 0 If (3)