The Provisions On "operational Programme Infrastructure And Services" Appendix. "national 3.4.2.1.2 Apakšaktivitāt Meaning" Bicycle Product Development

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi" papildinājuma 3.4.2.1.2. apakšaktivitāti "Nacionālās nozīmes velotūrisma produktu attīstība"

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/176093

Clarifies 10.06.2008., Journal No. 89 (3873) Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 348 Riga, 19 May 2008 (pr. 8. § 31) the provisions on "operational programme infrastructure and services" apakšaktivitāt "3.4.2.1.2. Appendix national bicycle product development meaning" Issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures for implementing the action programme ' infrastructure and services ' Appendix 3.4. Qualitative environmental priorities "life and economic activity" UR3.4.2.pas "tourism" contributes 3.4.2.1. activities of national importance for the tourism "product development" at the bottom of the activity "3.4.2.1.2. National interest bicycle product development" (hereinafter activity);
1.2. The European regional development fund project application evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project the applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competences between the two institutions, cooperation arrangements, as well as the responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. The purpose of the activity is to promote the development of the bicycle, bicycle infrastructure and created the light tourist safety and tourism resource sustainability assurance requirements. 3. activities at the Latvian residents and foreign travellers. 4. the implementation of the activity is detected in the project application selection. 5. The terms used in the following terms: 5.1-driving bicycle bicycle path built path; the walkway, which combines cycling and pedestrian movement; driving with bike intended for the bar or carriageway marked with the appropriate road signs and road markings;
5.2. velonovietn – the place to hold the bike fitted with a bicycle stand or veloskapj;
5.3. the object of tourism – one of the tourist attraction types, characterized by uniqueness or representation, aesthetic or historical value, such as a natural object, site, building, or structure;
5.4. rest – open areas for short term tourists to rest;
5.5. parking-furnished place parking lot for parking of vehicles and indicated by appropriate road signs and that can accommodate at least five vehicles. 6. the implementation of the activity provided by the responsible authority and the liaison body. Functions carried out by the responsible authority of the Ministry of Economic Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). The cooperation of the public authority for investment and development agency of Latvia (hereinafter referred to as cooperation body). The cooperation body is the functional authority. 7. the responsible bodies and authorities of cooperation functions: 7.1 the competent authority has the following functions: 7.1.1. ensuring the implementation of the activity, monitoring and control;
7.1.2. to apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle of activity level, the implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Council Regulation No 1083/2006), 1 and article 93, paragraph 2;
7.1.3. to inform the public and provide publicity on matters related to the implementation of the activity;
7.2. cooperation authority has the following functions: 7.2.1. create project applications of valuation, the composition of the Commission to coordinate with the responsible authority, as well as to develop the evaluation activities of the Commission;
7.2.2. upon assessment method of coordination with the responsible authority to carry out the project application selection and to ensure the application of the evaluation of projects;
7.2.3. before the adoption of the application project to develop, approve and publish the website internet liaison bodies of the project application and assessment procedures for the selection, project submission form, the evaluation, the evaluation methodology, the European regional development fund project submission form (hereinafter referred to as the project submission form) the fill method, the agreement on the implementation of the project, including the sample of interim and final expenditure report forms and a list of supporting documents;
7.2.4. to take a decision on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition and inform the European regional development fund, the project applicant (hereinafter referred to as project applicant);
7.2.5. to conclude an agreement with the beneficiary of the financing for the implementation of a project;
7.2.6. to ensure the activities within the approved project monitoring and control;
7.2.7. to provide the n + 2 and n + 3 principle on the project level, implementation of the Council Regulation No 1083/2006 and article 93, paragraph 2;
7.2.8. analyze problems and the implementation of the project and provide the responsible authority with proposals on how to improve the activity and project implementation;
7.2.9. to check and approve the funding request for payment and the recipient to prepare a declaration of expenditure;
7.2.10. to inform the public and provide publicity matters relating to activities within the submitted project applications;
7.2.11. ensure data retention in the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for project submissions and projects;
7.2.12. to provide information on the submission of the project preparation, project implementation and the fulfilment of the conditions of the arrangement. 8. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the European regional development fund. The overall activity within the available public funds is 5,787,797.56 lats. The European Regional Development Fund – 4 919 628 dollars, and the State budget and local government funding, not less than $868,169.56. II. Project applicant requirements 9. activities within the project application can be submitted to the municipality, if the property is land (or land is recorded in the project accounting balance sheet of the applicant), under which the applicant will carry out the investment project, and it is not leased or transferred on loan. 10. activities for funding under the project shall not be eligible if the applicant: 10.1 has not fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of taxes resulting from tax regulatory laws;

10.2. tried to get confidential information in your possession or control of a project submission Evaluation Commission or the authority, or the authority of this cooperation project submission or other European Union fund co-financed project submission evaluation. III. eligible and ineligible activities funding 11 existing cycle route reconstruction or construction of new bicycle at least seven kilometres in length, which provides a national tourism development, if the planned bicycle path is connected with the parking and rest areas, project total cost does not exceed LVL 3 514 020 and project not income. 12. Funds shall be granted the following: 12.1. operations the project applicant is started before the conclusion of the agreement with the liaison body for the implementation of the project, except that rule 13.1. bottom case referred to in paragraph 1;
12.2. the existing cycle route for renovation;
12.3. bike hire and bike service. IV. Eligible and ineligible costs 13. activities within the eligible costs are the following: 13.1 construction preparation and infrastructure engineering studies required for the cost of the legislation established that result from European Union funds regulatory laws in the order (the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds), up to seven percent of the project's eligible direct costs. Direct eligible costs of the project referred to in that rule 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 13.4, 13.5, 13.6 and 13.7 in;
13.2. the project building and autoruzraudzīb costs, not to exceed three percent of the project's eligible direct costs. This referred to the conduct of the performers can attract only service contract;
13.3. bicycle costs for reconstruction and construction. The traffic organization of technical costs shall not exceed 50% of the project's eligible direct costs;
13.4. bicycle information infrastructures (informative references, informative stands) design and installation costs;
13.5. the resting place of a building and reconstruction costs: 13.5.1. velonovietņ creation and installation costs;
13.5.2. the waste tanks, creation of acquisition and installation costs;
13.5.3. a bench, table, fire place and other rest areas utilities purchasing necessary equipment, construction and installation costs;
13.5.4. public toilet construction, installation and reconstruction costs;
13.6. greening the territory (grassland around the newly established cycle route) cost, lighting equipment reconstruction, acquisition and installation costs;
8.5. the project will promote marketing events – print a typographic material (brochures, maps, posters, catalogs), footage and audio-costs, not to exceed three percent of the project's eligible direct costs. Aided only the marketing efforts that directly promotes the newly established cycle route;
13.8. the costs relating to information and publicity measures for the project under the European Union funds the implementation of the laws regulating, not exceeding one percent of the project's eligible direct costs;
13.9. the value added tax, directly linked to the project, co-financed the project applicant cannot recover fully or partially according to the tax laws governing. 14. activities not eligible are the following: 14.1. project administration costs;
14.2. interest payments on money transfers, commissions, losses due to currency exchange and other direct financial expenditure;
14.3. the payment of duties and taxes, except for this provision to cases referred to in point 2.3.;
14.4. fines, penalties, interest on arrears, fines and legal expenses;
14.5. real estate purchase or rental costs;
14.6. the costs relating to leasing and rental transactions;
14.7. the dismantling of buildings, structures, renovation, restoration, reconstruction, construction and building costs, with the exception of those provisions referred to 13.5.4.;
14.8. use the product and use the acquisition cost of the equipment;
9.3. the current cycle route maintenance costs;
14.10. the renovation of an existing cycle route costs;
14.11. bike rental and bike service costs of establishment;

14.12. costs incurred prior to the conclusion of the agreement for the implementation of the project, except that rule 13.1. bottom case referred to in paragraph 1. 15. within the framework of the activity supports only the eligible costs directly linked to project activities are proportionate and reasonable. 16. investment if they are to be extended five years after implementation of the project will be the property of the applicant and the project will not be hired, placed in service to third parties. 17. the implementation of the project requires the purchase of the project, the applicant shall take place in accordance with the laws and regulations governing procurement procedures. 18. under this provision the funding is not combined with other funding program funding or individual funding projects in relation to the same eligible costs, with the exception of State budget allocations under the municipal territory development index in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the national budgetary procedures for awarding grants to the municipalities funds of the European Union for the implementation of projects co-financed. 19. The European regional development fund intensity does not exceed 85% of the total eligible costs. 20. activities within the project, the applicant may receive funding for a maximum of one project submission. The maximum of the European Regional Development Fund funding one project submission is 700 000 lats. The minimum value for the European Regional Development Fund funding one project application has 100 000 lats. 21. the project activities referred to in the application must be implemented within three years after the conclusion of the agreement with the liaison body for the implementation of a project. V. Project application selection and submission of tender project submission application adoption Projects 22 announcing on all available funding. If the project application deadlines does not apply for projects submissions for the entire activity available financing, organized the project application submission to the second round for the remaining funding. 23. the notice of project application submission to the authority of the cooperation agreement with the responsible authority, issued: 23.1. newspaper "Gazette";
23.2. the liaison bodies homepage on the internet (URwww.liaa.gov.lv). 24. Notice of project application submission issued at least one month in advance, indicating the project application deadlines within available funding, project submission making the start and end dates, and the address for the submission of project cooperation bodies in electronic mail address. 25. To apply for funding of the project, the applicant shall submit to the institution of cooperation. Application of the project consists of: 25.1. completed project submission form (annex 1);
25.2. in addition to the deliverable documents: 25.2.1. State revenue service for tax payment certificate (certificate for the project at the date of the application shall not be earlier than 30 calendar days) the consent of the applicant or the letter (the original of the letter is submitted separately, not attached to the application in the project), in which the project applicant authorizes the authority to request the cooperation of the State revenue service certificate (annex 2);
25.2.2. Project Charter, a copy of the applicant;
25.2.3. value added tax, a copy of the registration certificate, if the applicant is a project of value added tax-taxable person;
25.2.4. būvvald issued by the planning and architectural task;
25.2.5. būvvald planning and architecture issued on behalf of the owner of the specified or all utilities managers issued copies of the technical regulation;
25.2.6. construction plan approved by the būvvald (sketch project stage), if būvvald is not accepted construction plan is submitted technical stage of the project (if applicable);
25.2.7. būvvald of accepted projects (technical design stage) copy (if applicable);
25.2.8. pursuant to Cabinet of Ministers on 19 December 2006, the provisions of no. 1014 "rules for the Latvian et seq of the LBN 501-06" the procedure "Būvizmaks" developed the construction cost estimates, indicating a copy and separating all labour and materials cost of the items listed in the project and eligible non-eligible costs, if the construction plan has been prepared prior to the application of the project;
25.2.9. a copy of the certificate of the civil engineers who developed them, if the construction plan has been prepared and accepted by the būvvald before the application of the project;
25.2.10. local Government Council (Council) decision on participation in the project and all project related to the implementation of legal commitments, indicating the total cost of the project application and source of pre-financing;
25.2.11. Finance Ministry letter of consent for the purposes of the project, if the project is requesting financial stabilisation process;
25.2.12. documents certifying the ownership of the land on which the intended construction, – in the land ownership of the registered copy of the identity document. If the property is not registered in the land registry, the State land service of the original certificate of property belonging to the applicant and consists of projects, as well as asset tracking copy of a card;
25.2.13. project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax project, prepared in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for issuing and checking the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds (if the project is eligible costs included in the value added tax);
25.2.14. planned cycle route of cartographic material, including parking and rest areas, tourist information, cycle route information infrastructures (informative references, informative stands), tourist accommodation, catering, public transport, tourist attractions and locations, as well as linking to an existing cycle route, if required in the application of the project;

25.2.15. If a project has undergone an environmental impact assessment, environmental monitoring national Office opinion on the impact on Natura 2000 sites, as well as assessment reports evaluation report. Projects that have been carried out the initial evaluation of the environmental impact, but the impact on Natura 2000 sites should not apply, the procedure adds decision on impacts to Natura 2000 site assessment procedures and not the national environmental service of the relevant regional environmental management technical rules. 26. the project application can be submitted in paper form or electronic form of a document. Project submissions in paper form can be submitted to the Liaison Office or sent by registered mail. Project application that is designed to be an electronic document, may submit to the institution of cooperation, be sent by registered mail or sent to cooperation bodies in electronic mail to the address listed in the notice of project application acceptance: 26.1. If the application is sent by mail, on the date of application is treated as the postmark shows the date of shipment. In the event of a dispute, the applicant must demonstrate that the project submission sent before the submission of the project application;
26.2. If the application is submitted electronically, sent to the liaison bodies in electronic mail address for submission at the time the project is seen as the time when it is sent by electronic mail. In the event of a dispute, the applicant must demonstrate that the project is sent to the application before the application deadline for the submission of projects;
16.3. If the project application submitted personally, on the date of submission of the project is the collaborative authority contains the receipt date. 27. Documents to be submitted shall meet the following requirements: 27.1. the project application is completely filled in, into Latvian language;
16.9. If additional documents to be submitted are not Latvian language, shall be accompanied by a certified translation into Latvian language in the document in accordance with the laws and regulations on the procedures for translation of documents in which the national language;
27.3. the project was made in the original application in accordance with the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document;
27.4. the project submission form 6.1. and 6.2. Advanced submitted electronically in one instance (xls file submission format, recorded not rewritable CD). 28. If the project application and additional supporting documents shall be submitted in paper form, they shall be submitted in two copies (original and copy). Each project application submitted hardback copies, numbered pages, with table of contents, caurauklot, the last page in the second half of the thread ends are glued, stamped with the seal of the applicant and the project to provide information on the labels in the document, and the page number the number of caurauklot, proof of the correctness of the copy of the document, the document's author, date, and signature design. The original copy of the first page is an indication the "original", to copy the first page – "copy". Project applicant letter of consent submitted separately, not in the application of the draft caurauklot. 29. the application shall be accompanied, where the electronic document, the following requirements shall be met: 29.1. application developed in the project and presented in the appropriate electronic document circulation of the regulatory requirements of the law;
29.2. the project submission developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format;
29.3. the project submission form and in addition to the original document to be submitted are signed by each individual author secure and certified electronic signatures with time stamp to the project submission deadlines the deadline. If additional documents are copies of documents, they are certified in each individual to the project the applicant secure electronic signatures and certified by a time stamp to the project submission deadlines the deadline;
29.4. the application of the project-project submission form and additional documents to be submitted together with a signed project-is requesting a secure electronic signature and add a time stamp;
29.5. the project submission form and 6.2 section 6.1 submitting xls file format. 30. cooperation authority within 15 working days after submission of application sort of projects end of written notice to the applicant of the project the project application registration number. Vi. Project application evaluation and decision-making activities within 31 to submit the evaluation of project applications provide cooperation authorities created the project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission). The Commission establishes the following order: 31.1. the Commission comprises cooperation bodies, responsible authorities and the country's tourism policy implementing body;
31.2. the composition of the Commission to coordinate with the responsible authority;
31. the President of the Commission and members of the Commission the voice eligible approved cooperation bodies;
19.5. the meetings of the Commission as observers may participate in the managing authority and the responsible authority. 32. The Commission shall determine the authorities approved the cooperation agenda. 33. project submissions valued under the following evaluation criteria (annex 3): 33.1. quality criteria (specifically the introduction of eligibility criteria): project readiness, 33.1.1. submitting it;
33.1.2. facilities of the planned cycle route (the minimum number of points-five points);
33.1.3. tourist information accessibility to planned cycle route;
33.1.4. tourist accommodation and catering space availability to the planned cycle route;
33.1.5. project cycle route planned marketing activities at the local and the international level (the minimum number of points-three points);
33.1.6. the planned cycle route linking public transportation;
33.1.7. tourist attraction into a well-marked route;
33.1.8. project planned cycle route linking with the existing cycle route;
33.1.9. investment against the planned number of tourists in the year following the implementation of the project;
33.1.10. application of and compliance with the project horizontal priority "macroeconomic stability", requested by the European Regional Development Fund funding intensity;
33.1.11. application of and compliance with the project horizontal priority "equal opportunities"-project specific activities provided for equal treatment, especially by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities;

33.1.12. application of and compliance with the project horizontal priority "Sustainable Development"-project specific activities provided for in the negative impact on the environment for the elimination or reduction;
33.2. eligibility criteria (substantive, financial and eligibility criteria in the implementation): 33.2.1. project eligibility criteria: 33.2.1.1. project costs and financing source allocation calculation done arithmetically correct;
33.2.1.2. the cost of the project complies with these rules 13, 14 and 15;
33.2.1.3. the requested funding is properly calculated and do not exceed this rules 19 and 20 above;
33.2.1.4. expenditure planned is economically justified, necessary for the implementation of the project and provides measurable results physically;
33.2.1.5. bicycle path is connected to at least one parking lot;
33.2.1.6. bicycle path is connected with a landscaped resort;
33.2.1.7. the project for the izbūvējam cycle route in length is at least seven kilometres;
33.2.1.8. application of the project planned activities and results to be achieved are clearly defined, reasonable, measurable, according to project implementation time schedule and focus on the achievement of the project objectives;
33.2.2. project eligibility criteria of the applicant: 33.2.2.1. project eligibility of the applicant's paragraph 9 of these regulations;
33.2.2.2. project met this rule 10.1.;
33.3. administrative criteria (design and submit eligibility criteria): application of the project used 33.3.1. the currency is the lats;
33.3.2. submission of the original of the project is the document legal force, and it complies with this provision 16.3.;
33.3.3. design application has been drawn up according to the provisions referred to in paragraph 25.1. project application form, the project application is accompanied by all the additional documents to be submitted (this in addition to the list of documents to be submitted). All documents are presented according to the laws and regulations on the development and design of a document;
33.3.4. project application form is fully completed and complies with this rule 25.1.;
33.3.5. the project is not specified in the application for correction, deletion, addition, deletion, or aizkrāsojum, and the project submission complies with these rules in the bottom paragraph; 17.0.
33.3.6. implementation of these regulations shall not exceed the time limits referred to in paragraph 21;
33.3.7. projects within the framework of this activity, the applicant does not submit more than one project submission;
33.3.8. a project proposal is prepared and submitted to the Latvian language;
33.3.9. the project is drawn up into the application;
33.3.10. project application is filed within the time limit laid down;
33.3.11. a project proposal is submitted in two copies-the original and the copy (if filed on paper). 34. the project submission's compliance with the administrative and eligibility criteria is assessed by "Yes" or "no" ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). Application of project compliance with quality criteria assessed by giving a certain number of points. Project submission compliance is assessed on the basis of these provisions referred to in paragraph 33 the assessment criteria and with the project application selection and evaluation procedures, as well as application forms, assessment provided in the laws of the order in which the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds and the European Union fund management and control system. 35. the project submission evaluation order: 21.8. launching the evaluation assesses project first submission compliance with this provision. 33.3.10. If the application does not comply with this provision. 33.3.10 criterion, referred the application of the assessment of the project pursuant to the other provisions of paragraph 33 of the above criteria do not continue;
35.2. If the application complies with this provision 33.3.10 in this criterion, launches an application for conformity assessment of a project under this provision, 33.2.1.6., 33.2.1.5., 33.2.2.1., 33.2.1.7. and 33.3.7 33.3.2. criteria referred to in point. If the application does not meet at least one of these rules, 33.2.1.6., 33.2.1.7 33.2.1.5., 33.2.2.1., 33.3.2. and 33.3.7. criterion, referred the application of the evaluation of the project according to the other provisions of paragraph 33 of the above criteria do not continue;
35.3. If the application complies with all the rules of 33.2.1.5., 33.2.1.6., 33.2.1.7., 33.2.2.1., and the bottom point 33.3.2.33.3.7. criteria referred to in the application for the project evaluation continues under this rule 33.1. criteria referred to in subparagraph;
35.4. all tenders submitted submissions assessed pursuant to this rule 33.1. criteria referred to in these rules and comply with 21.8 21.9 21.9., and the conditions listed in the bottom, ranked the project application deadlines within the descending order according to the number of points obtained. 33.2.1.1. This provision, 33.2.1.2., 33.2.1.3., 33.2.1.8., 33.2.2.2 33.2.1.4.,.,.,., 33.3.4 33.3.3 33.3.1.,.,., 33.3.8 33.3.5 33.3.6., 33.3.9. and 33.3.11. criteria referred only to assess the project submissions, which are met by the comparison between this provision and 37.3 37.2. the requirements referred to in point. 36. If there is no information in the project application in order to assess compliance of the application for the project to one or more of the evaluation criteria, as well as if this information is not legible or not submitted to the Latvian language, believes that the project submission does not meet the criterion or criteria concerned given lower ratings. 37. the decision on the approval of the project application is accepted if the following conditions are met: 37.1. the project submission complies with the project applicant eligibility criteria, all project submissions and administrative criteria of compliance;
37.2. the project the application of these provisions, the criteria referred to in subparagraph 33.1.2. has won at least five points and this provision referred to in subparagraph 33.1.5., at least three points;
37.3. submission of the project under the project application to the quality criteria has won at least 60 points;

23.2. the project application is received the highest rating for compliance with quality criteria, comparing project submissions under the resulting points. If multiple project submissions receive the same number of points, priority is given to the submission of the draft with a higher rating that rule 33.1.8. criteria referred to in subparagraph. If after evaluation of the application of projects under this provision 33.1.8. criterion referred evaluation are equal, priority is given to the submission of the draft with a higher rating that rule 33.1.7. criteria referred to in subparagraph. If after evaluation of the application of projects under this provision 33.1.7. criterion referred evaluation are equal, priority is given to the submission of the draft with a higher rating that the criteria referred to in subparagraph 33.1.1.. 38. the decision on rejection of the application for the project is accepted if at least one of the following conditions: 38.1. the project submission does not meet one or more of these rules, 33.2.1.6., 33.2.1.7 33.2.1.5., 33.2.2.1.,.,., or 33.3.10 33.3.2 33.3.7. criteria referred to in subparagraph;
38.2. the project the application of these rules or 33.1.5.33.1.2. in the criteria referred to in point not won any points;
23.8. list of project submissions under the resulting points in accordance with the quality criteria, the submission of insufficient funding does not receive a sufficient number of points (more than 38.4. these provisions States the minimum number of points, taking into account the project application order by ranking);
23.9. the application of the project according to quality criteria have not won at least 60 points. 39. The decision on the application of the project approval may include conditions which must be fulfilled in order to project the applicant would conclude the agreement on the implementation of the project: 24.3. to clarify the application of the project's financial plan and cost estimate, in the case of the arithmetic calculation errors. Making revisions, the total amount of eligible costs, funding and effort should not be increased;
24.4. must submit additional information, in order to ensure the relevance of the information to the evaluation criteria;
39.3. of the project's eligible costs exclude costs that this rule in paragraph 12 and 14 identified as ineligible;
24.5. the project should be clarified;
24.5. to clarify the funding under these rules 19 and 20;
24.6. to certify that taxes and other State and local Government set minimum payments are made in full and the time limits laid down in laws and regulations;
24.7. the project submission must be clarified according to this provision, 33.2.1.2., 33.2.1.1., 33.2.1.3., 33.2.1.8., 33.2.2.2 33.2.1.4..,.,., 33.3.4 33.3.3 33.3.1.,.,., 33.3.8 33.3.5 33.3.6., 33.3.9. and 33.3.11.;
24.7. the project application must be designed according to these rules 27, 28 and 29. 40. This provision of the information referred to in paragraph 39 is required after project evaluation. After the submission of the project application to the information quality criteria of assessment is not changed. 41. cooperation authority determines the terms contained in the decision deadline. The due date is not longer than three calendar months from the date of dispatch of the decision. Information about the decision the conditions contained in the project the applicant shall submit to the liaison body for assessment. The liaison body shall assess the information submitted by the applicant for the project and prepares opinion on its compliance with the conditions laid down in the decision. If the applicant does not provide the draft decision contained in the conditions or the conditions are not met within the time limit referred to in the decision, the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. Opinion on the decision of the non-compliance with conditions of cooperation authority within two working days after the signing of the opinion sent to the project applicant. 42. This provision, the time limits referred to in paragraph 41 shall not be extended. 43. the arrangements for the project, the applicant is entitled to challenge or appeal against decisions taken by the European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management in chapter IV of the law. The rules referred to in paragraph 41 of the opinion of Justice assessed simultaneously with the decision taken by the evaluation of the rule of law. VII. Project implementation and financing conditions 44. in accordance with the statutory procedures, the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds, within five working days after the conclusion of the agreement for the implementation of a project in the beneficiary shall submit to the authority of the procurement plan of cooperation. 45. The beneficiaries of the first tender issued within three months following submission of the project's approval. 46. The funding recipient is available, the following methods of payment: 46.1. advance payment not more than 20% from the European regional development fund;
46.2. interim payments granted on the basis of the eligible expenditure, and that may require no more than once every six months;
46.3. final payment is granted after the implementation of the project on the basis of the eligible expenditure. 47. Advances and intermediate payments shall not exceed 90% of the total European Regional Development Fund funding. 48. The beneficiary receives an advance payment if the following conditions are met: 48.1. the beneficiary has entered into agreement with the liaison body for the implementation of a project;
48.2. the beneficiary submits a collaborative institution purchase plan;
48.3. the implementation of the project is to open a checking account in which the Treasury is made and received all the payments related to the implementation of the project. 49. The beneficiaries of cooperation bodies for the specified account to repay the amount, if the advance exceeds the approved funding, calculated in proportion to the intensity of funding toward the project activities eligible costs. 50. The beneficiary receives the interim or final payment if the following conditions are met: 50.1. the beneficiary has entered into agreement with the liaison body for the implementation of a project;
50.2. the funding recipient project has opened a checking account in the Treasury, which is made and received all the payments related to the implementation of the project;

50.3. investments, except that rule 13.2, 13.8 and 13.9. the costs referred to in (a), included in the assets of the beneficiaries as a long-term investment and the depreciating of at least five years after the implementation of the project will be the beneficiary of the property;
50.4. the investment is actually made and listed in the beneficiary's book-keeping, cost is identifiable, separate from the rest of the cost, and verifiable, and they acknowledge the original source document concerned;
50.5. investments are necessary for the implementation of the project, is designed for in the approved project submission is made pursuant to and in accordance with the principle of financial management, namely in accordance with economy, efficiency and effectiveness;
costs are incurred by 50.6. agreement in terms of the implementation of the project within the specified period (that is, the duration of this agreement, as long as it is not designed for such eligible costs, made before the conclusion of the agreement in accordance with this provision, section 13.1) and is based on paid invoices or other relevant source documents;
50.7. beneficiary has prepared an interim and final reports submitted by the authorities of cooperation and agreed to the terms for the implementation of a project on time;
50.8. cooperation authority after verification of interim and final reports are approved. 51. The liaison body shall be reduced on a pro rata basis the amount of funding in the following cases: 51.1. the actual use of the funds is less than that provided for in the project application;
51.2. not implemented in any of the activities set out in the conditions agreed for the implementation of a project, but the aim of the project is achieved;
51.3. the financial resources have been submitted for the use of supporting documents;
51.4. the project cost estimates specified eligible costs are disproportionate and not economically justified;
51.5. project applicant in implementing the project, deceived the liaison body and provided false information. 52. cooperation between the authority has the right and the closing statements at the time of the evaluation, as well as the payment by the applicant of the project required the additional information required. 53. Cooperation between States, the authority has the right and closing statements at the time of the evaluation, to call an expert to verify that the project cost estimates specified eligible costs are not unreasonably high. 54. cooperation authority payments made with the Cashless settlement project open project applicants in the Treasury account (specified in the request for payment). 55. cooperation authority project funding to be paid to the applicant shall be determined on the basis of the eligible costs of the project, procurement documentation and expenses submitted supporting documents prepared, subject to the charges and evidence of business development and design requirements. 56. Breaking the agreement for the implementation of the project, the collaborative authority requires the beneficiary to repay in full the funds paid out. The beneficiary is obliged at the request of cooperation in full to repay the funding received. 57. The beneficiary shall ensure that up-to-date information on the implementation of the project to the funding recipient institutions's homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months. 58. the project applicant project application stores the original or its derivatives with legal force until the end of the project evaluation, but, if the project is approved, up to December 31, 2021. Prime Minister i. Godmanis economic Minister, the Minister of Justice g. Smith presented the Ministry of the economy version of annex 1 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 348 economic Minister, the Minister of Justice g. Smith presented the Ministry of the economy version of annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 348 economic Minister, the Minister of Justice g. Smith presented the Ministry of the economy version of the annex 3 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 19 May 2008 a Regulation No 348 Project submission evaluation criteria 1. Quality criteria point rating system scale project 1. preparedness, submitting it: 0-15 (min 0) application is not added to the project planning and architectural task, the required technical regulations, the construction of the būvvald consistent design stage of the project and the construction of the technical design of the accepted stage 0 has been added to the application project planning and architecture tour of the assignment and all the necessary technical provisions for the application of the project 3 is connected to the construction of the būvvald coherent sketch project stage 6 application is added to the project, the construction of būvvald accepted the technical project stage 15 2 of facilities in a planned cycle route. : 0-13 (min. 5) create a planned cycle route does not provide any of the following measures for infrastructure improvement – setting up claims and create velonovietņ 0 create a planned cycle route provides one of the following infrastructure improvement measures – the installation or the indications velonovietņ creation creating the planned cycle route 5 provides two measures of infrastructure improvement – setting up claims and create velonovietņ 13 3. Tourist information accessibility to planned cycle route: 0-5 (0 min) closer than 500 m from the planned cycle route is not one of the following objects-tourist information Office , tourist information centre, tourist information, tourist information booth or a public internet point 0 no further than 500 m from the planned cycle route is available in one of the following items-a tourist information Office, tourist information centre, tourist information, tourist information booth or a public internet point no further than 500 m 2 from the planned cycle route is available in two or more objects-tourist information Office , tourist information centre, tourist information, tourist information booth or publicly available internet use paragraph 5 4. Tourist accommodation and catering space availability to the planned cycle route: 0-10 (0 min) closer than 500 m from the planned cycle route is not one of the accommodation and catering place 0 no further than 500 m from the planned cycle route is available the accommodation or catering site 5 no further than 500 m from the planned cycle route is available for tourist accommodation and catering place
10 5.

The project designed a bicycle marketing measures at local and international level: 0-10 (min 3) marketing efforts are not designed or intended for only one marketing type of measure 0 for at least two types of marketing activities for at least three 3 marketing measures 6 for four or more types of marketing efforts. the planned 10 6 cycle route linking with public transport: 0-5 (0 min) closer than 500 m from the planned cycle route is not public transport stops 0 no further than 500 m from the planned cycle route is local or international public transport stop 500 m 3 no further than from the planned cycle route is local and international public transport stop for 5 7. inclusion of well-marked tourist route: 0-5 (0 min) on the route of the planned cycle route no tourist attractions scheduled bicycle path 0 connects at least two tourist destinations planned 3 bicycle path connects three and several tourist destinations planned cycle route 5 8. linking with existing cycle route : 0-20 (min. 0) the projected bicycle path will not be linked to an existing cycle route 0 planned bicycle path will be attached to existing cycle route 15 scheduled bicycle path will be bound to two or more of the established cycle route 20 9. Project for investment against the planned number of tourists in the year following the implementation of the project: 0-10 (0 min) investments more than 200 Lats per the associated tourist investment of 150-200 0 dollars per tourist 4 investment associated with 100-150 Lats per the associated tourist 8

investment less than 100 lats for one tourist bound 10 1.1. criteria horizontal priorities 10. Requested the European regional development fund, the financing rate is: 0-85% 3 0 1 65,01-84.99 75.01-75% 2 to 65% 3 11 for project specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities, in particular by improving accessibility for people with functional disabilities: 0-2 project does not foresee specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities in the project for the 0 1 3 specific activities for the provision of equal opportunities 1 project four and a number of specific activities equal opportunities project intended for 2 12. specific activities have a negative effect on the environment for the elimination or reduction of: 0-2 project does not foresee specific activities negative effects on the environment for the elimination or reduction of 0 is for specific activities negative effects on the environment for the elimination or reduction of 2 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria ranking system Yes/No 13. Project costs and financing source allocation calculation is done arithmetically correct 14. eligible costs of the project and the extent to meet the activity specific funding requested 15. the amount is calculated correctly and match the activity set is approximately 16. expenditure economically justified, necessary for the implementation of the project and provides measurable results for the physical creation 17. Bicycle path is connected to at least one parking 18. Bicycle path is connected with a landscaped resort 19. Project for the izbūvējam cycle route in length is at least seven kilometers in the application of the project planned activities and results to be achieved are clearly defined in the , reasonable, measurable, according to project implementation time schedule and focus on the achievement of the project objectives 2.2 Project eligibility criteria applicant ranking system (yes/no) 21. Project applicant is municipality, and it meets the requirements of the project the applicant 22. has paid taxes and other State and local government at minimum payments in full and legal time limits 3. Administrative criteria ranking system Yes/No 23. project application used currency is the lats 24. application the original Project is the document legal force 25. project application is prepared according to the project application form and project application is accompanied by all the additional documents to be submitted (this in addition to the list of documents to be submitted), and they are designed according to the laws of the Republic of Latvia requirements 26. Project application form is completely filled in application of the project 27 is not discouraged, erasures, correction, deletion or addition of aizkrāsojum 28. Project implementation duration does not exceed the period of time specified in activity 29. projects within the framework of this activity, the applicant does not submit more than one project application 30. project proposal is prepared and submitted to the Latvian language 31. project application is drawn up into 32. project application is filed within the time limit 33. project application is submitted in two copies (original and copy (if filed on paper)) the Minister of economy, Minister of Justice in place of g. Smith