Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 396 in Riga, June 2, 2008 (pr. No 36 § 4) the rules on the "operational programme human resources and employment" apakšaktivitāt "Appendix the social partners ' administrative capacity ' issued in accordance with the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management law, article 18, paragraph 10 i. General questions 1. determines: 1.1. procedures implemented by the operational programme" human resources and employment ' priorities 1.5 of Appendix "administrative capacity" UR1.5.2.pas "based on human resources capacity building" activity "1.5.2.2. Social partners , non-governmental organizations and local government capacity building "1.5.2.2.1." at the bottom of the social partners in the activities of the relevant administrative capacity building "(hereinafter referred to as the sub activity);
1.2. the European Social Fund (hereinafter the project) submission evaluation criteria;
1.3. the requirements of the project applicant;
1.4. the responsible institution and liaison body, the distribution of competences and procedures of cooperation between those authorities, responsible authorities and cooperation agencies functional form of subordination. 2. the purpose of Apakšaktivitāt is to promote regional development and social dialogue to raise the social partners ' participation in the development and implementation of policies. 3. the purpose of the group is Apakšaktivitāt institutions that ensure the employers ' and workers ' organizations of interest representation in policy decision-making at national and European Union level, as well as employers and workers and their organisations. 4. the purpose of the Apakšaktivitāt achieved in implementing this provision, paragraph 19, and follow this rule in paragraph 45.1.7 below super-power duals. 5. Apakšaktivitāt implement the project application to the limited selection. 6. during the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt limited the project application selection shall take place no more than two times. 7. the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt period is from the date of entry into force of the provisions to 30 June 2015. II. The responsible authority and the liaison body With the implementation of the 8 apakšaktivitāt sais wound responsible authorities implemented the obligations and rights of the State Chancellery of the structural funds of the European Union Department (hereinafter referred to as the responsible authority). 9. With the implementation of the commitments of the wound apakšaktivitāt cooperation bodies implement the obligations and rights of society integration Fund secretariat (hereinafter referred to as the lag between body). 10. Cooperation authority has functional authority. 11. Apakšaktivitāt within the responsible authority: 11.1. participating in the agreement on the implementation of the project (hereinafter referred to as the agreement) project;
11.2. in monitoring the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt, not to be exceeded the rules laid down in point 15 of the apakšaktivitāt available for the implementation of the European Social Fund financing, and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle apakšaktivitāt level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and referred to in paragraph 2;
11.3. the managing authority and the provisions of the measure referred to in paragraph 69 of the Monitoring Committee proposals for improving the implementation of the activity of the bottom;
11.4. use of European Union structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system for monitoring the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt;
11.5. the cooperation requested from the institutions and the European Social Fund, the beneficiary (hereinafter called beneficiaries) the information required to ensure the monitoring of the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt and control. 12. within the framework of cooperation of the Apakšaktivitāt authority: 12.1. send a limited range of applicant projects call for project applications (hereinafter referred to as the notice);
12.2. a limited application of the selection of projects project application Evaluation Commission;
12.3. the development of the project application form filling methodology and project application assessment methodology;
12.4. provide project information project to the applicant at the time of application;
5. assess the project submissions and decides on the approval of the project application, approval or rejection of the condition;
12.6. the accumulated data for project submissions and projects in the legislation of the European Union's structural funds and the cohesion fund management information system and the information society the use of prescribed;
12.7. the development agreement and the conclusion of agreements with project funding recipients, as well as provide information about the recipient of the funding arrangement;
12.8. consider and submit to the procurement monitoring Bureau funding recipient's procurement plan;
12.9. gives budgeting laws regulating certain information in the national budget funds for the preparation of the request;
12.10. ensure project implementation monitoring and control, including checks in the project locations and apply the n + 2 and n + 3 principle on the project level, implementation of the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, article 93 1 and 2 above;
12.11. check beneficiary's payment claims submitted, the eligible expenditure of the approved amounts, prepare and submit to the authority of payments payment orders, prepare and send to the managing authority for the inspection of declarations of expenditure;
12.12. the amendments to the project;
12.13. the preparation of the information to the authority responsible for the implementation of the apakšaktivitāt available in European Social Fund funding;

12.14. provide information to the public and ensure the implementation of the project publicity. III. financing conditions provide the applicant 13 Projects can be national level social partner that provides employer or worker organizations of interest representation in policy decision-making at national and European Union level. 14. the implementation of the project may involve cooperation partners – direct administration and administrations directly. 15. the project is financed from the European Social Fund and State budget funds allowed. The bottom of the activity within the European Social Fund financing is 85 percent of the total eligible project cost totals, but 15 percent of the national budget funding. The total funding available in apakšaktivitāt are 2 259 310 pounds, including the European Social Fund funding 1 920 414 dollars and State budget funds 338 896 lats. 16. Minimum total eligible cost amount per project this is apakšaktivitāt 1 000 000 lats. The maximum total amount of the eligible cost per project this is apakšaktivitāt 1 300 000 lats. 17. The implementation of the project will not exceed this provision laid down in paragraph 7. 18. within the framework of Apakšaktivitāt funded projects that provide for the regional development of social dialogue and the social partners ' participation in the promotion, policy development and implementation. 19. The project is supported by the following: 19.1. project administration;
19.2. the institution of regional structures, with employers ' and workers ' organizations of interest representation in policy decision-making at national and European Union level;
19.3. the training;
19.4. Exchange of experience and expertise;
19.5. organizing of seminars and conferences;
12.2. information and publicity events. 20. One project apakšaktivitāt within the applicant can submit more than one project submissions, not exceeding the provision in paragraph 15 and 16 above. 21. application of the project eligible costs are broken down into four cost headings: 21.1. project administration costs – no more than five percent from 21.2. these provisions and costs referred to in paragraph 21.3. set amounts. Project Administration arrange the company or service contract;
21.2. the logistical means and equipment costs. They can be about livestock trader costs of project-specific implementation of the activity, if the unit does not exceed 150 lats and its life expectancy is less than a year;
21.3. other eligible costs: 21.3.1. consultants, experts and specialists ' fees;
21.3.2. State social security payments and other social guarantees, which is compulsory in accordance with external laws and regulations;
21.3.3. the seminars, conferences and the Organization and implementation of training-related costs;
21.3.4. transport costs – fuel, rental, purchase, the service, the use of public transport;
21.3.5. travel costs in the Republic of Latvia and abroad according to the laws and regulations governing the missions and duty travel;
21.3.6. space, logistic and equipment rental costs;
21.3.7. space, materials, technical and equipment maintenance costs;
21.3.8. information and publicity costs according to the regulations governing the structural funds of the European Union;
21.3.9. with the implementation of project activities of the associated costs;
13.3. contingencies, an amount not exceeding 5 percent from 21.2. these provisions and 21.3. referred to cost totals. They use this rule 21.2. and 21.3. States to cover the costs. 22. The value added tax payments to the project you can plan as eligible costs, if the beneficiary of the value added tax amount not recoverable as input tax in accordance with the laws governing. 23. in addition to the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 of the second subparagraph of article 11 conditions of ineligible costs the following: 23.1. all types of bonuses, prize money and material incentives after annual evaluation;
23.2. the leave benefits to employees;
23.3. the allowance to the employee's family member or dependent death (employees);
23.4. other material incentives, which are not necessarily pay the mentējoš regulation: legislation;
14.6. the health, life and accident insurance;
14.7. the costs associated with the development of project submissions. 24. the application provided for in the project, eligible costs must be actual, reasonable, appropriate to the specificities of the project, the purpose and the rules 21 and 22. 25. in the course of project implementation costs are considered eligible if they: 25.1. incurred in the period determined in agreement with the beneficiary;
25.2. it is necessary for the implementation of the project for the approved project submission and make the appropriate financial management, economy and efficiency;
25.3. made and posted to the beneficiary or the partners in the accounting records and are separate from the rest of the cost.
15.8. to check the identifiable and certifies the payment and its supporting document original. IV. the application of the project 26. Cooperation authority, after consulting the authority, on the basis of this provision, paragraph 13, send the applicant projects call for project applications (hereinafter referred to as the notice). 27. The invitation shall: 27.1. the project submission deadline;
27.2. apakšaktivitāt the funding available;
27.3. the application of the project;
27.4. the address of the Web site that you inserted the following: 27.4.1. procedure for the submission of the application, the project of sending it by mail, in person or submit an electronic document;

27.4.2. the project for the preparation of the application, materials used (these provisions and consumables project submission form to fill out). 28. subject to the provisions of paragraph 6, the limited application of the second selection authority shall organise cooperation only when timed this rule 54.2. or 59.2. the bottom paragraph. 29. the project application submitted to the authority to call for cooperation in the specified due date. Period not less than one month from the date of dispatch of the invitation. Project application be rejected if it is received after the specified deadline. 30. the project application consists of the completed project submission form (annex 1) and its attachments: 30.1. project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of the life course (CV);
30.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable);
30.3. authorisation of supporting documents (if applicable);
18.9. the project applicant questionnaire-application of value added tax, provided for in the laws and procedures and checks the information provided on the application of value added tax to the European Union within the framework of the projects co-financed by the structural funds and take a decision on the inclusion of value added tax to the project-related costs. 31. the project application to the Latvian language fills in text. 32. the project of cooperation between the authorities submitted the application in one of the following ways: 32.1. five paper copies (one original and four copies), conditioned in accordance with the laws and regulations on the art and design of the dāšan;
32.2. an electronic document – drawn up according to the law on electronic document design (uses XML file formats). 33. the paper submitted the original application of the project the project is added to the electronic version of the application (electronic media). The media noted the following: 33.1. apakšaktivitāt number and name;
33.2. the project name of the applicant;
33.3. the name of the project. 34. when submitting a project application in paper form, all documents (original and four copies in electronic version) inserts a sealed envelope. On the envelope: 34.1. the words "restricted access information";
21.3. the cooperation of the name and address of the authority;
21.3. the project the name and address of the applicant;
21.4. the number and name of apakšaktivitāt;
34.5. the name of the project. 35. the project application submitted by the applicant together with the accompanying letter to the project. The covering letter indicates the name of the applicant, the project apakšaktivitāt's number and name, and project name. 36. cooperation authority registers the project submitted the application filing date, the identification number and the project applicant project application or issued at the time of five working days by post proof of receipt of the application for the project. 37. in paragraph 27 of these rules the invitation specified in the project application submission period end date is the last day when the liaison body shall accept and register the project submissions. Project application can be submitted personally, electronic document or send by post: 37.1. If the project application submitted personally or sent by mail, the application of the project period is considered the time when it filed and registered with the institution of cooperation;
37.2. If a project document submitted to the electronic application form, the application of the project time is considered to be the moment when it established cooperation bodies in electronic mail information system. The head of the project agreement should be signed with a secure electronic signature and confirm with the time stamp before the project submission deadline for submission;
37.3. If the application is lodged by the project electronic document form or sent by post, the applicant provides timely dispatch of the application of the draft to get cooperation authority no later than 27 of these rules with the invitation specified in the project application deadlines;
23.2. If a dispute arises, the applicant must demonstrate that the project is sent to the application before the application deadline for the submission of projects, but the cooperation should be based on the authority that the application is received or is filed after the project submission deadline. V. submission of the project evaluation and decision-making within the 38. Apakšaktivitāt application project provides the evaluation cooperation bodies create a limited selection of project submission Evaluation Commission (hereinafter the Commission). The Commission operates under the authority of the cooperation developed and approved the Charter. 39. the Commission with voting rights included in the cooperation of the authorities, institutions and the Ministry of education and science. 40. the Commission observer status may include a representative of the managing authority. 41. in the absence of the members of the Commission he is replaced by another authorized representative. Such authorisation shall be made in writing to the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Statute. 42. the Commission submitted to the project within the apakšaktivitāt application may call upon experts. 43. in order to determine the technical conformity of the application of the project, the project assessed the cold output according to the following administrative evaluation criteria: 43.1. the project application is filled in text (if applicable);
43.2. the project proposal is completed in English;
43.3. the project application is completely filled;
43.4. these regulations has been submitted to the project application, by the number of plār Exo (one original and four corresponding certified copies) (if applicable);
43.5. project application, the original is cauršūt (caurauklot) (if the relati cinām);
27.1. the project proposal is prepared according to these provisions a specific project submission form;
27.2. the project application is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer or authorized person;
43.8. the project application is accompanied by all these rules, certain attachments: 43.8.1. project administration and implementation of the staff involved in the description of the life course (CV);
43.8.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable);
43.8.3. a mandate of supporting documents (if applicable);
financial statement project 43.9 is made in national currency;
43.10. eligible expenditure of the project complies with these rules establish Thai eligible costs;
43.11. the requested total eligible cost not less than 1 000 000 lats and not more than 1 300 000 lats;

43.12. project estimated eligible costs exceed the cost limit;
43.13. project implementation term is not longer than 30 June 2015. 44. in order to determine the project application met the requirements and submission of the project's compliance with the defined in the cījum apakšaktivitāt off, project submissions valued according to the following criteria for the evaluation of conformity: 44.1. the applicant is hereby invited to submit a project application;
44.2. the project submission complies with the specific objective of promoting regional development and social dialogue to raise the social partners ' participation in the development and implementation of policies. 45. in order to determine the importance of the application of the project identified in the problem solving and ability of the applicant to the project to implement the project, as well as select priority projects assisted submissions that the application of the project would gain more support, project submissions valued according to the following quality evaluation criteria: 45.1. a project supporting the application evaluation criteria: 45.1.1. extent to which the project will be able to solve 1. operational programme "human resources and employment" the problem in the development of social dialogue;
45.1.2. to what extent the project will address the 1.5.2.2.1. apakšaktivitāt ' social partners ' administrative capacity ' target groups EEDs promoted;
45.1.3. the project's contribution to the implementation of the horizontal priorities: 45.1.3.1. or project is the direct or indirect positive effect on the horizontal priority of equal opportunities;
45.1.3.2. or project is the direct or indirect positive effect on the horizontal priority of the information society;
45.1.4. how logical is a common project structure (project section of cross compliance and the additionality);
45.1.5. evaluation of project activities (activity statement, the need for activities and compliance with the project's objectives and expected results achieved in the equestrian, schedules, assessments);
45.1.6. project sustainability assessment (results of the project in financial, institutional and political sustainability);
45.1.7. or project submission outcome indicators or planned results indicators contribute to the achievement of such monitoring indicator: 45.1.7.1. outcome indicators: created the Latvian employers ' konfed radio and the Latvian free trade union's regional bodies-10 (zes o value in 2004:0 score in 2009 – 0);
45.1.7.2. the result indicators: the proportion of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements,-21 percent of the total number of employees (the base value to 18 percent in 2004, the goal in 2009-19 percent);
45.1.8. does the project planned a publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and are appropriate to the activities planned in the project;
45.2. the project implementation capacity evaluation criteria: project administration 45.2.1. personnel involved in the project management experience;
45.2.2. project applicants and staff involved in the implementation of the project's technical or professional capacity (project staff experience and knowledge 1.5.2.2.1. apakšaktivitāt ' social partners ' administrative capacity strengthening of the horse ");
45.2.3. project implementation logistics support planning;
45.2.4. project submissions for project roles and responsibilities are relevant (clearly defined functions and responsibilities between the bodies involved and the staff involved in the administration of the project, roles and responsibilities are divided according to the competency and experience);
45.2.5. project submissions for project management and supervisory mechanism is adequate (management, control, monitoring and evaluation of quality control mechanisms);
45.2.6. project implementation involved the choice of partners is the basis of ta (stated in the planned cooperation model; the role of the partners defined according to its competence and experience);
45.3. the project budget submission evaluation criteria: project submission for 45.3.1. costs are reasonable and necessary for the purpose of the project and his results and activity implementation;
45.3.2. the project's budgeted costs corresponds to average market prices;
45.3.3. the cost of the project is commensurate with the expected results of the project;
28.2. specific quality criteria: 45.4.1. project applicant employer and (or) Organization of workers ' interests representation in policy decision-making at national and European Union level;
45.4.2. the project the applicant provides the social partners ' capacity building for participation in national and European employment, labour, social and education policy development and implementation;
45.4.3. project applicant has experience employers ' and trade union organizations in building a regional and national level. 46. the project application, compliance with this provision in paragraph 43 and 44. kritēr ERS are scored with "Yes" or "no". ("Yes", "no" – meets does not meet). 47. Compliance with quality criteria (the proportion of the total assessment represent 80 percent of the quality criteria maximum score possible) shall be determined as follows: 29.3. conformity of project submissions for each of these rules, and 45.1 45.2 45.3... criteria referred to in paragraph 1 below valued with a score from 1 to 5 according to the following ratings: 1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory, or neutral, 4-good, 4-very good (except that provision referred 45.1.3. criteria);
47.2. According to this provision, 45.1.2 45.1.1.45.2.2. subparagraph and points earned are multiplied by a factor of 2;
47.3. compliance with this provision mentioned in paragraph 45.1.3.1. below the criteria evaluated to 0, 3 or 5 points according to the following ratings: 0-project does not affect this area, 3-project has an immediate positive effect, 5-project has direct positive impact;

compliance with this rule 47.4.45.1.3.2. below the criteria referred to in points scored with 0, 3 or 5 points according to the following ratings: 0-project activities in the development of the information society, 3-project activities (apakšaktivitāt) target group training on information communication technology or intended to increase opportunities for the target group to participate in policy-making and policy implementation, the use of information communication technology solutions, 5-project is intended to develop or improve information systems or improve electronic service quality or availability;
47.5. If the project is not involved in the cooperation partners, compliance with this provision in subparagraph 45.2.6. this criterion is assessed by 3 points. 48. Compliance with quality criteria (their share of the joint rating make up 20 percent of the maximum possible points) scored the following: 48.1. the project submission's compliance with this provision in the multiannual 28.2 min criteria evaluated to 0 or 1 (0-the condition is not met, 1-condition is satisfied);
According to this rule 48.2.45.4.1.45.4.2. apakšpun JTIS and obtained points multiplied by a factor of 9, according to paragraph 45.4.3. below points earned are multiplied by the factor 8.49. design application of appropriate application project: 49.1 justification evaluation criteria (45.1. the bottom) if the total number of points shall not be less than 33 points;
30.6. the project implementation capacity evaluation criteria (45.2. bottom), if the total number of points shall not be less than 21 points;
30.6. the project budget submission evaluation criteria (45.3. bottom), if the total number of points shall not be less than 10 points. 50. If the project is found, the application does not match at least one of these provisions in paragraphs 43 and 44 above criteria or this rule 49.1., or 30.6 30.6.. the conditions laid down in paragraph below, the Commission suspended the application of the evaluation of the project and recommends the application of the project should be rejected. 51. project quality criteria for the evaluation of the application of the project application is assigned a certain number of points overall. 52. the Commission's approval of the project application guide or approval, except where it is found in at least one of these rules, paragraph 50. 53. the project application to the Commission for approval with conditions driven if necessary clarifications 45.1.5. these provisions or 45.3. criteria referred to in subparagraph under paragraph 57 of these rules. 54. on the basis of a Commission recommendation, the liaison body shall take a decision on the application of project: 54.1 approval for financing from the European Social Fund, the Commission has recommended the application of the project to confirm or approve with conditions;
54.2. the rejection of the application of the project funding from the European Social Fund, the Commission has recommended the rejection of the application for the project. 55. cooperation authority within five working days after the decision, inform the applicant of the project. 56. the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority of cooperation accompanied by information on the conditions under which the agreement will be concluded. 57. the decision on the application for the approval of the project, provided in collaboration with the Office of the project point to initiate the application in detail, which may include: 57.1. planning of project activities according to the clarification this provision referred to in paragraph below 45.1.5 criteria expressed in the rating guide (time schedule changes, up to the time of the planned project, the Division of activities on or off);
57.2. project budget clarification this provision accordingly below. referred to in 28.1 the criteria expressed in the rating guide (reduction or exclusion, compliance arithmetical), in so far as it does not affect this rule 21.1. or 21.4. restrictions referred to;
57.3. other legally reasonable activities to ensure project for ma technical compliance. 58. the decision on the application for the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in the project shall ensure cooperation bodies deadline (not exceeding 30 working days) and information about the conditions in the decision to submit the institution to assess the cooperation. 59. cooperation authority within 10 working days evaluate these regulations 58. information referred to in paragraph 1, draw up the opinion on the compliance with the conditions and decisions: 59.1. If the opinion is positive, two working days, inform the applicant of the project on the conditions under which the agreement will be closed;

59.2. If the opinion is negative because the applicant has not provided a draft decision contained in the conditions or not it provided the rule 58, the time limit referred to in the project's application rejected. If the decision is contested, the opinion of Justice evaluated simultaneously with the decision taken by the evaluation of the rule of law. 60. If the application is rejected, the liaison body, this provision of the Act and paragraph 55.61. 61. the decision on rejection of the application of the project liaison body shall include details of the project and the reasons for rejection of the application, the project applicant project application four copies. 62. This rule 43, 44 and 45 projects referred to in paragraph submission evaluation criteria set out in these provisions and in project evaluation system of the application compiled application evaluation criteria of the project as a whole (annex 2), approved by the Monitoring Committee. Vi. Project implementation conditions 63. Following the adoption of the decision on the application for the approval of the project authority for cooperation with the beneficiary of the financing arrangement in which the switch covers the obligations of the Contracting Parties and rights, as well as the procedure and conditions (including the financing conditions and payment arrangements), which must be followed to ensure the implementation of the project. 64. The beneficiary is responsible for the implementation of the project according to the approved project submission and provide a collaborative report on authority of implementation progress and financial implementation in accordance with the agreement. 65. The beneficiaries of the activities provided for in the project implementation started only after agreement. 66. the implementation of the project open separate accounts for the Treasury, from which is made and received all the payments related to the implementation of the project. 67. the draft amendments to be made according to the procedures laid down in the laws of the European Union's structural and cohesion funds in the participating institutions provide the planning document preparation and implementation of these funds. 68. The beneficiary shall ensure the implementation of the project related loading snapshot homepage on the internet (if applicable) not less frequently than once every three months. VII. monitoring the implementation of the Apakšaktivitāt 69. Apakšaktivitāt control functions taken "human capacity building" Monitoring Committee (hereinafter referred to as the super-power of the measure in response to the Committee). 70. the Activities of the Monitoring Committee has the following tasks: 70.1. consider responsible authorities, cooperation agencies and the beneficiaries of the information provided on the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;
70.2. the authorities responsible to examine proposals for the necessary amendments to the European Union's structural funds programming documents and decide on their progress to the Monitoring Committee;
70.3. proposals for measures to provide the "human capacity building" the streamlining of the monitoring process. 71. The event, the Monitoring Committee has the following rights: 71.1. to request and receive from the responsible authorities, cooperation authorities and funding requested information related to the implementation of apakšaktivitāt;
71.2. the measures for the meetings of the Monitoring Committee in an advisory capacity to call on industry professionals and experts. 72. measures Monitoring Committee chaired by the Director of the State Chancellery. Secretariat functions carried out by the responsible authority. 73. the measure shall operate in accordance with the regulations. The Statute approved in open voting by a majority, taking part in at least two thirds of the actions of members with the Monitoring Committee. 74. in the event the Supervisory Committee meets no less than quarterly. 75. The event, the Monitoring Committee with voting rights included in the Ministry and local government representatives who are involved in the planning of human resources policy and implementation, as well as the national Office, the responsible authorities and representatives of the social partners. 76. the measures for the meetings of the Monitoring Committee in an advisory capacity can participate in the managing authority, certifying authority, liaison body and the representatives of non-governmental organisations involved in human resource planning and implementation of the policy. This provision within the non-governmental organizations are associations and foundations under the society and Foundation law. 77. the activities of the personnel of the Monitoring Committee, on the basis of the mandates of the institutions and bodies, approved by the Prime Minister. Prime Minister i. Godmanis Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok annex 1: Cabinet of Ministers of 2 June 2008. Regulations No 396 Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok annex 2 of the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 June 2008. Regulations No 396 application evaluation criteria Project performance program number and name 1. human resources and employment priority number and name 1.5. Administrative capacity measures the number and name of the human resources capacity building 1.5.2. activities number and name 1.5.2.2. social partners , non-governmental organizations and local government capacity building number and name of Apakšaktivitāt 1.5.2.2.1. the social partners of the administrative capacity of the project application selection way limited the project application selection responsible authority public registry 1. quality criteria (point scale from 1 to 5:1-very weak, 2-poor, 3-satisfactory (neutral), 4-good, 5 very good) system for rating scale Point 1.1. justification for the application of the project evaluation criteria the maximum number – 55 points 1. Extent to which the project will be able to solve 1. operational programme "human resources and employment ' these problems development of social dialogue in the area of 5 x 2 2. to what extent the project will address 5.2.2.1. apakšaktivitāt ' social partners ' administrative capacity ' target group needs 5 x 2 3. contribution of the project horizontal priorities: 3.1 or project is direct or indirect positive impact on equal opportunities horizontal priority – the project has direct positive effect (5 points)-project has an immediate positive effect (3 points)-project does not affect this area (0) 5 3.2.

Or project is the direct or indirect positive impact on the information society in the horizontal priority – projects designed to develop or improve information systems or improve the quality of the electronic services or availability (5 points)-project activities (apakšaktivitāt) target group training on information communication technology or intended to increase opportunities for the target group to participate in policy-making and policy implementation, the use of information communication technology solutions (3 points)-project activities in the development of the information society (0) 5 4. How logical is a common project structure (project section cross compliance and additionality) 5 5. evaluation of project activities (activity statement, the need for activities and compliance with the project's objectives and expected results, schedules, assessment) 5 P 6 project sustainability assessment (results of the project in financial, institutional and political sustainability) 5 7. application project Or planned outcome indicators result indicators or facilitating such surveillance indicators: Outcome indicator. Created the Latvian employers ' Confederation and the Latvian free trade union's regional bodies-10 (the base value in 2004:0 score in 2009-0) Led indicator. The proportion of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements,-21% of the total number of employees (the base value to 18% in 2004, the goal in 2009-19%)
5 8. Does the project planned a publicity and information activities to ensure the project's publicity and are appropriate to the activities planned in the project if the assessment of compliance with 5 1-8. the criterion received less than 33 points, the submissions rejected 1.2. Project implementation capacity evaluation criteria the maximum number – 35 points 9. project administration experience of staff involved in the management of the project. the project applicant and 5 10 project staff involved in technical (Professional) capacity (project staff experience and knowledge 5.2.2.1. apakšaktivitāt ' social partners ' administrative capacity ' in scope) 5 x 2 11. Project implementation logistics security planning application for the project 5 12. the functions and responsibilities of the project distribution is appropriate (clearly defined functions and responsibilities between the bodies involved and the staff involved in the administration of the project, roles and responsibilities are divided according to the competency and experience) 5 13 application for project management and project supervision mechanism is adequate (management, control, monitoring and evaluation of quality control mechanisms) 5 14. Project implementation involved the choice of partners is based (specified in the planned cooperation model; the role of the partners defined According to its competence and experience) 5 If project partners are not involved in the assessment criteria, is 3 points if the assessment of compliance with criterion 9-14 received fewer than 21 points, the submissions rejected submission of draft budget 1.3 evaluation criteria the maximum 15 points 15. project application for costs is reasonable and necessary to the project's objectives and results and the implementation of activities 5 P 16. project budget costs corresponding to average market prices 5 P 17. Project costs are proportionate to the with the expected results of the project 5 P If assessment of compliance with the 15.-17. the criterion received less than 10 points, the application is rejected, 1.1 1.2. and 1.3. criteria of assessment of part of the share is 80% of the overall project rating 1.4. Specific quality criteria project 0/1 application-specific quality criteria assessed by the evaluation, 0, if the criterion is not met, and 1 if the criteria is met. Quality evaluation criteria are multiplied by a factor of 8 or 9 maximum number-26 points 18. Project applicant employer and (or) Organization of workers ' interests representation in policy decision-making at national and European Union level 1 x 9 19. Project applicant provides the social partners ' capacity building for participation in national and European employment, labour, social and education policy development and implementation 1 x 9 20. Project applicant has the experience employers ' and trade union organizations in building a regional and national level 1 x 8  
1.4. criteria of assessment of part of the share is 20% of the overall project rating 2. eligibility criteria Yes/No 21 Project applicant is invited to submit a project application to the Yes/No N ** 22. project application meets the stated purpose: "to promote the regional development of the social dialogue and the social partners to increase the participation in the development and implementation of policies of" Yes/No if the assessment of conformity N 21 and 22. criterion is negative application of the project rejected 3. Administrative criteria Yes/No 23. project application is filled in text (if applicable) Yes/No N 24. project application is filled out in English Yes/No N 25. project application is fully completed (yes/no) N 26. Is submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 June 2008 No. 396 of the rules "rules for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' Appendix apakšaktivitāt "social partner" administrative capacity "project set the number of copies of the application (1 original and 4 according to the certified copies) (if applicable) Yes/No N 27.
The original application is the project cauršūt (caurauklot) (if applicable) Yes/No 28. N. project submission is prepared according to the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 June 2008 No. 396 of the rules "rules for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' Appendix apakšaktivitāt "social partner" administrative capacity "for the project submission form Yes/No N 29. project application is signed by the applicant's institution of the project officer/authorized person Yes/No N 30. project application is accompanied by all the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 June 2008 No. 396 of the rules" rules for the operational programme "human resources and employment ' Appendix apakšaktivitāt "social partner" administrative capacity "as defined in the annex:




30.1. the project administration and implementation the CVS of staff involved in the Yes/No N 30.2. the cooperation of the partnership (if applicable) Yes/No N 30.3. authorisation of supporting documents (if applicable) Yes/No N 31. project financial statement is made in the national currency (yes/no) N 32. eligible expenditure of the project comply with the Cabinet of Ministers of 2 June 2008 No. 396 of the rules "rules for the operational programme" human resources and employment ' Appendix apakšaktivitāt "social partner" administrative capacity "the eligible costs laid down Yes/No N 33. the requested total eligible cost is less about 1 300 000 1 000 000 and not exceeding LVL LVL Yes/No N 34. Project estimated eligible costs exceed the cost restrictions Yes/No N 35. Implementation of the project shall not exceed 30 June 2015 for N If yes/no rating for compliance with the criterion of 23-35 is negative, the project submission rejected notes. * P-non-exhaustive criteria is provided. ** N-if the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected.
Minister with special responsibility for European Union financial management matters N. Brok