The Provisions On "operational Programme Infrastructure And Services" Apakšaktivitāt "appendix 3.5.1.2.1. Regulatory Requirements Without The Corresponding Dumps Conditioning"

Original Language Title: Noteikumi par darbības programmas "Infrastruktūra un pakalpojumi" papildinājuma 3.5.1.2.1.apakšaktivitāti "Normatīvo aktu prasībām neatbilstošo izgāztuvju rekultivācija"

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/178473

Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No. 490 Riga, 30 June 2008 (pr. No 44 57. §) rules on "operational programme infrastructure and services" apakšaktivitāt "Appendix 3.5.1.2.1. Regulatory requirements without the corresponding dumps conditioning" issued under the European Union's structural and cohesion funds act 18 paragraph 10 of article i. General questions 1. determines the order in which the activities of the "infra structure and services" Appendix 3.5. priorities "environmental infrastructure and environmental friendly energy contributes" UR3.5.1.pas "environmental infrastructure" apakšaktivitāt "3.5.1.2.1. Regulatory requirements without the corresponding dumps conditioning" (hereinafter activity) the project submission evaluation criteria, the applicant and the project authority.
2. The purpose of the activity is to reduce the negative effects on the environment caused by waste and environmental protection requirements not corresponding dumps.
3. activities implemented in the framework of projects co-financed by the European Union Cohesion Fund (hereinafter referred to as the Cohesion Fund). Activity within the available funding under the cohesion fund 13 774 958 lat and national public funding-6 482 332 lats.
4. activities to target waste in the region of an votāj – municipal territory residents.
5. the competent authority is the Ministry of the environment. The responsible authority provides all the intermediary body functions, including appropriate competency ensured that would not be exceeded in these regulations for the implementation of the activities of the Cohesion Fund funding, and monitor the available funding under the Cohesion Fund, including the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 93. Article 1 and 2 of the principle referred to in the performance of the activities and project level, controlling the project financial plan.
6. implement a limited activity in the project application selection.
II. Project activities eligible, eligible and non-eligible costs of the activity within the 7 supports legislative requirements not applicable household waste dumps common waste disposal area conditioning: 7.1 the activities directly related to the dump, conditioning;
7.2 pēcrekultivācij monitoring equipment.
8. within the framework of the activity does not support the remediated, if the legal person responsible for the pollution, does not exist and it is not possible to apply the "polluter pays" principle.
9. subject to the conditions contained in the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the Council of 11 July 2006, Regulation (EC) no 1084/2006 establishing a Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94, the relevant costs are the following: 9.1 with the environmental impact assessment (if such is required) related documentation development costs , a construction and design documentation development costs, but not more than three percent of the Cohesion Fund project total eligible costs amount, determined by the decision on the application of the cohesion fund the project approval and the agreement on the implementation of the Cohesion Fund;
9.2. autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5 per cent of the eligible costs of the works;
9.3. building costs but no more than three percent of the eligible costs of the works;
9.4. the cost of the works;
9.5. pēcrekultivācij monitoring equipment needed to perform the delivery costs.
10. Non-eligible costs are as follows: 10.1 with the environmental impact assessment (if such is required) documentation associated development costs, development projects and related documentation of the development costs, which exceed three percent of the Cohesion Fund project total eligible costs amount, determined by the decision on the application of the cohesion fund the project approval and the agreement on the implementation of the Cohesion Fund;
10.2. autoruzraudzīb costs in excess of 0.5% of the eligible costs of the works;
10.3. building costs, which exceed three percent of the eligible costs of the works.
11. the project cost does not include: 11.1. the implementation of the project specially made equipment costs, excluding pēcrekultivācij monitoring equipment required for the installation and execution of necessary equipment purchase or rental costs;
11.2. administrative or project management purposes long usage of the equipment to be used (including hardware and vehicles);
11.3. the fee for accounting and auditing services;
11.4. the fee for the legal, technical and financial advice provided for the cohesion fund the project during its implementation;
11.5. The cohesion fund the project management involved in staff remuneration and administrative project management, as well as the beneficiary's current maintenance costs;
11.6. the revolving loan funds and the cost of the acquisition, paid for the review of the design of the loan, reservation and service charges for financial transactions, interest on arrears, penalties and expenses of litigation;
7.3. land acquisition costs;
11.8. conditioning costs in cases where the cohesion fund the project at the time of the application is performed in the municipal waste dumps common waste disposal area conditioning.
III. requirements for cohesion fund projects applicant 12. Cohesion Fund projects the applicant has: 12.1, within the territory of which the requirements of the laws and inadequate waste dumping site (annex 1);
12.2. the municipality in whose territory is not in the waste dump, but who is responsible for the pollution.
13. Cohesion Fund projects, the applicant shall ensure that it has the right to carry out the works concerned, where the laws are not in appropriate waste dumping site: 13.1. land is registered in the land registry as a local government property;
13.2. If the land is denacionalizēt with the burden, with the land owner agreement on property use restrictions, secured the land for a period of not less than five years after the completion of the project, or to the time necessary for carrying out of monitoring of pēcrekultivācij.
14. On the financing of the Cohesion Fund may not qualify if: 14.1 if the cohesion fund the project to the applicant on the application of the project the first date of the month has tax arrears;
14.2. If the cohesion fund projects the applicant has received from local, regional, national or European Union funds in support of the same eligible costs for other programmes;
14.3. If with the burden of the owner of the land is denacionalizēt disposed of the land to another private person.
Vi. A call for submission of the project under the cohesion fund the Cohesion Fund 15 project application selection issued in two project application selection rounds. The first project application selection issue a three-year period, the second-two year period: 15.1. first application round project available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is LVL 8 265 058;
15.2. the second application round of projects available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is at least 5 509 900 lats;
15.3. If the first application round of projects available for funding from the Cohesion Fund is used up, it directs the second project application selection round of financing.
16. the responsible authority shall call for cohesion fund project submissions sent by mail or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design) this provision listed in annex 1 to the municipalities or local authorities that are responsible for the pollution and that are located in the administrative territory of the municipal waste management in the region, having approved the waste management plan: 16.1. application the first draft selection round – not earlier than one month after the entry into force of these regulations; 
16.2. the second project application selection round-up January 2, 2011.
17. If an invitee, the potential of the cohesion fund the cohesion fund the project applicant project application submitted to the responsible body within the time limit set or the responsible authority for the project application, the invitation sent to the next year. The potential of cohesion fund projects, the applicant is invited to submit the application to the cohesion fund projects once a year for a period of two years.
18. Calls for the cohesion fund the project application to the cohesion fund projects for applicants not send after 15 December 2012.
19. If invited potential cohesion fund projects, the applicant shall not submit the application to the cohesion fund projects after it received the invitation twice, it will no longer be eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund in that activity in these provisions.
20. The cohesion fund the project application to the first application round project to the responsible authority within two months of the invitation is sent, the rules referred to in annex 1 to the municipalities.

V. the cohesion fund the project to the application project and application evaluation criteria 21. Rate of aid from the Cohesion Fund shall not exceed 50 per cent of the project total eligible costs Riga City municipality and 85 percent the rest of the territory of Latvia authorities. The remaining eligible costs shall be borne by the beneficiary.
22. The minimum amount of funding activities within one project under the Cohesion Fund is not defined. One project total cost must not exceed the activity of available funding from the Cohesion Fund.
23. the application of the cohesion fund projects per project, the applicant complies with the provisions of annex 1. In one project, you can only schedule one in the application of the laws of non-compliant municipal landfills conditioning.
24. the cohesion fund projects, the applicant within the time limit specified in the application to the cohesion fund projects shall be submitted to the responsible body: 24.1. paper form – fill the cohesion fund the project application form (annex 2) language into Latvian. The cohesion fund the project application to the head of the local Government invited a signature or his authorised person. The cohesion fund the project invited the applicant to submit one paper of caurauklot cohesion fund project application, the original and one copy of it to caurauklot (no attachments), as well as submit the electronic version of the application. The attached document page number;
24.2. electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature, and the preparation of appropriate legislation on electronic document design). If the Cohesion Fund project application submitted electronically: 24.2.1. it must be designed to DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format;
24.2.2. in addition to the deliverable documents (including electronic copy of the paper document) must be developed and designed for the electronic circulation of documents regulatory laws.
25. The cohesion fund the cohesion fund the project applicant project application form Annex adds: 25.1. an estimate of the works in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework the statutory procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price;
25.2. the technical specifications for the procurement of the works contract for purchase of tender in accordance with the governing law;
25.3. the municipal decision on funding. The decision to apply separately and are not eligible costs.
25.4. the authorities proof that rekultivējam the dump has been or is being used for municipal waste management (disposal) function;
25.5. the legislation that documentation showing authorization of the municipality in implementing cohesion fund projects, if the municipality is in the process of financial stabilisation;
6. a copy of the credit agreement is concluded or credit issued a copy of the document certifying that the credit will be granted to the municipality;
25.7. documents certifying that the cohesion fund the project by submitting a stuffy nose is entitled to carry out the works concerned, that the cohesion fund the project for construction work: supporting document 25.7.1. ownership of a copy of the land on which is located the rekultivējam landfill;
25.7.2. with land owner a copy of the agreement reached on the property use restrictions in place in the land for a period of not less than five years after the completion of the project, or to the time necessary for carrying out of monitoring of pēcrekultivācij;
25.8. The cohesion fund the project cash flow forecast;
16.1. The cohesion fund the project procurement plan for NIP.
26. The cohesion fund the project submission evaluation, the Commission shall examine the application of the cohesion fund projects in compliance with the administrative, compliance, quality and the availability of funding assessment criteria.
27. The cohesion fund the project submission evaluation administrative criteria are as follows: 27.1. a project proposal is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified time limits;
27.2. the project applicant is invited to submit a project application;
27.3. the project application submitted according to the application design requirements (this rule 24.1 and 24.2. bottom.)
27.4. the project application is fully completed (annex 2);
17.1. the project for the application, accompanied by all required attachments (this provision, paragraph 25).
28. The cohesion fund the project submission compliance evaluation criteria are the following: 28.1. The cohesion fund the project will reduce the negative impacts of landfills, to the quality of the environment;
28.2. The cohesion fund the project will remove the threat of the disease of the population;
28.3. The cohesion fund the project's application relates to the municipal dump of conditioning, which included legislative requirements without the corresponding dumps list (annex 1);
28.4. the waste dumping site registered contaminated and potentially contaminated sites registry;
28.5. The cohesion fund the project submission complies with the spirit of the activity stāmaj activities (this rule 7;)
28.6. The cohesion fund the project submission complies with the activities related to the nāmaj costs (this provision);
17.8. The cohesion fund the project submission complies with activities not relati costs cināmaj (10 of these regulations;)
17.9. the project under the cohesion fund the Cohesion Fund in the application project description provides the necessary information on the activities to be carried out;
46.8. The cohesion fund the project time schedule meets the planned activities;
28.10. The cohesion fund the project information provided in the submissions demonstrate that the cohesion fund projects, the applicant will provide a cohesion fund sustainability the project results;
No 28.11. Cohesion Fund projects in the specified application fiziskie indicators meet the project schedule;
No 28.12. the requested funding from the Cohesion Fund aid rate does not exceed 50% of the project total eligible costs Riga City municipality and 85% in the rest of the territory of Latvia authorities;
28.13. Cohesion Fund project budget includes costs are justified;
28.14. The cohesion fund the project cash flow forecast is justified;
28.15. Cohesion Fund project indicative procurement plan is based;
28.16. Cohesion Fund projects in the application reflect the planned implementation of the project under the Cohesion Fund and the organisation chart provides human resources planned legislation in certain functions of the beneficiaries;
28.17. Cohesion Fund projects planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the cohesion fund the project publicity and information measures;
28.18. The cohesion fund the project applicant – municipality – no tax liability to the project application, the first working day of the month;
28.19. Cohesion Fund projects the applicant has the right to carry out the works concerned, where the laws are not appropriate waste dumping site.
29. The cohesion fund the project application to the quality evaluation criteria are the following: 29.1. Cohesion Fund projects in the stage of ripeness;
29.2. The Cohesion Fund project implementation effectiveness in relation to the requirements of the laws and not the corresponding dumps conditioning;
29.3. waste authorities, land owners (municipalities, private owners) an additional financial contribution to the implementation of the project;
29.4. the cost estimate of the return pointer (the amount of waste landfilled (tonnes) relative to the initial total cost ($));
29.5. dump category according to their hazard potential and pollution;
18.4. The cohesion fund the project area development index project at the date of the application.
30. According to this provision, and 29.5 29.2 29.1. in points received in evaluation the Commission shall establish a list of projects and the priority of the application based on the application of the cohesion fund projects eligible cost specified in the amount, determine which projects will have sufficient funding for the project application selection round. Project priority list is used, if the criteria for the selection of projects according to the total amount of the projects exceed this provision accordingly, 15.1 or 15.2. funding referred to in the selection round. If two or more of the application to the cohesion fund projects have received the same amount of points, the project priority list ranked in the following order: 30.1. Cohesion Fund project application with the highest rating on the draft application evaluation criteria according to that rule 29.1.;
30.2. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest rating on the draft application evaluation criteria according to this provision the 29.5.;
30.3. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest rating on the draft application evaluation criteria according to that rule 29.4.;
18.9. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest rating on the draft application evaluation criteria according to these rules 29.2.;
5. submission of the project under the Cohesion Fund with the highest rating on the draft application evaluation criteria according to that rule 29.3.;
30.6. The Cohesion Fund project application with the highest rating on the draft application evaluation criteria according to that rule 29.6.;
19.1. The cohesion fund the project submission in full compliance with all the cohesion fund projects in Koh application eligibility criteria of evaluation.

31. The cohesion fund the project submission evaluation approach of funding criteria needed: cohesion fund project priority list, drawn up in accordance with paragraph 30 of these regulations is available on the financing of the Cohesion Fund.
Vi. The cohesion fund the project application to the assessment and decision making procedures 32. Responsible authorities leader creates a project application to the limited selection of cohesion fund projects for the evaluation of the application of the Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Commission) and confirm the Statute (regulations of the members of the Commission include the substitution procedure and the absence of expertise). The Evaluation Commission is composed of the responsible authority, the Ministry of environment, local government and the Latvian Union of environmental non-governmental organization representatives, as well as a representative of the Managing Authority observer status. The observer provides the findings of the evaluation of the work of the Commission for submission to the responsible authorities the driver in terms in which the evaluation the Commission shall draw up an opinion on cohesion fund project evaluation results.
33. the responsible authority: 33.1. month after the entry into force of the develop and approve a draft application to the limited selection of the Cohesion Fund project application assessment methodology and project submission form filling methodology;
33.2. in the month following the entry into force of these provisions on its home page on the internet (www.vidm.gov.lv) the project limited application selection the cohesion fund the project application form (annex 2), the cohesion fund the project submission evaluation form (annex 3), the application form filling project methodology, project evaluation methodology and application to the cohesion fund projects required for the implementation of methodological materials, as well as the standard procurement procedures;
33.3. record submitted to the cohesion fund the project submissions, grants them an identification number and within two weeks the cohesion fund the project applicant or transmitted electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature), or by mail, proof of submission of the project under the Cohesion Fund.
34. the Commission assesses cohesion fund project submissions: 34.1. "Yes", "no" and "does not apply" with respect to the evaluation criteria listed in that provision, 27.2 27.1 27.3 27.4.,.,.,., 28.1, 27.5 28.2 28.3 28.4,.,.,.,., 28.6 28.7 28.5., 17.9, 18.0., 28.10., No 28.12 28.13 No 28.11.,.,.,.,., 28.15 28.14 28.16., 28.17 28.19, 28.18. and in paragraph 31 and. If the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected. If the criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant project application concerning these criteria not assessed;
21.3. giving each project application determine the number of points on the teaching evaluation relati criteria mentioned in these rules 29.2 29.3 29.1.,.,.,.,., and 29.6 29.4 29.5 in. The project application is approved if the project application under these rules 29.2 29.1.,., and to point, rating, 29.5. each criterion has at least one point.
35. In assessing the project application to the Cohesion Fund in relation to the evaluation criteria listed in that provision, and 29.6 29.4 29.3. in application of the project receives additional points.
36. the head of the authority, on the basis of the evaluation of the opinion of the Commission, shall decide on the application of the cohesion fund projects for approval or rejection.
37. the head of the responsible authority may decide on the Cohesion Fund for project approval submissions, indicating the time limit within which: 37.1. to clarify information about the beneficiary of the financing (contacts and properties) (annex 2);
37.2. the annexed documents should be specified according to this provision, paragraph 25;
37.3. to clarify changes in the total amount of eligible costs and eligible according to paragraph 9 of these regulations;
23.2. to clarify the cohesion fund the project time schedule according to the activities planned under this provision of paragraph 17.9;
37.5. to clarify the cash flow forecast according to 28.13. these provisions;
23.4. to clarify the project under the cohesion fund the indicative procurement plan under this provision 28.14.;
37.7. to clarify the application of the cohesion fund projects in the planned European Union Fund for the implementation of the project organisation chart and planned human resources security under this provision 28.15.;
23.5. to clarify information on publicity measures under this provision. 28.16.
38.20 working days following this rule 37. the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1 of the evaluation, the Commission shall assess the application of the decision on the approval of the project provided the conditions contained in performance and the responsible authority shall draw up an opinion on the conditions contained in the decision.
39. If the condition is not satisfied that rule 36 or within the time limit referred to in this provision, paragraph 36 of the responsible authority opinion is negative, the project application to the Cohesion Fund shall be deemed to have been rejected. In the opinion of Justice as the decision shall be carried out by the control that contains the control in the conditions of execution of the opinion is prepared.
40. the overall condition of the delivery time can not be longer than three months. This provision in paragraph 37 that date cannot be extended.
41. Decisions on cohesion fund project approval or rejection of the application, the designated authority within five working days after the decision by post or electronically (signed with a secure electronic signature) the cohesion fund the project applicant.
VII. Procurement procedure, the purchase contract and Amendment 42. Procurement procedures carried out in the beneficiary.
43. the responsible authority within two months after the entry into force of these regulations shall be published on the website of the Ministry of the environment (www.vidm.gov.lv) procurement guidelines and procurement documents.
44. The first of the procurement procedure issued within three months following submission of the project under the Cohesion Fund approval.
45. If the beneficiary does not comply with the regulatory provisions of the procurement provisions in the light of the requirements laid down, the cost of such contracts signed, considered not eligible under the cohesion fund the project costs.
VIII. Payments 46. All expenditure by the beneficiaries, based on legally binding contracts and accounting documents.
47. the responsible authority shall, in accordance with the agreement on the implementation of the cohesion fund projects within the time and in order to transfer an advance payment to the recipient of the funding. Advances and interim payments, as well as all of the Cohesion Fund project expenditure necessary means of funding the recipient opens an account in the Treasury. The beneficiary in implementing cohesion fund projects, all payments shall be made only from that account.
48. The beneficiary after this rule 47, paragraph opening the account presented signatures sample card, certifying the person with authority to act for the account of the existing financial resources and a copy shall be submitted to the competent authority before payment of the cohesion fund projects.
IX. implementation of the cohesion fund the Cohesion Fund 49. beneficiaries of the Cohesion Fund for all project activities to be implemented within two years after the conclusion of the agreement for the implementation of cohesion fund projects.
50. The Cohesion Fund beneficiary not less frequently than once every three months to ensure current information into the website on the internet (if any) on the cohesion fund the project implementation process.
51. If, after the agreement on the implementation of the Cohesion Fund, the cohesion fund the project necessary to amend, the beneficiary shall submit a proposal to the responsible authority completed form for amendment of the project (annex 4).
52. in the letter of agreement for the implementation of the cohesion fund projects of amendments shall not be made in the following cases: 52.1. If the actual eligible costs not in relation to the project originally specified not eligible costs varies by less than 20 percent;
52.2. If total project activity changes during the implementation of the project shall not exceed five percent of the approved amount of the projects monetised;
52.3. If changes in the project's procurement plan does not change the total amount of the purchase.
53. the beneficiaries of the Cohesion Fund provides report saga and submission of support before the body responsible under agreement for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund.
X. monitoring activities by implementing 54 projects. The Cohesion Fund beneficiary is directly responsible for project implementation and maintenance of results for at least five years after the implementation of the project. Beneficiaries of the Cohesion Fund in the five years after the implementation of the cohesion fund projects once a year in accordance with the provisions of annex 5 to the responsible authority provides information on: 54.1. The cohesion fund the project results achieved compliance with the objectives set out in the application;
54.2. areas of future rekultivēt use under planning;
54.3. rekultivēt the legal status of the territory;
54.4. pēcrekultivācij the results of the monitoring of compliance with the national environmental service specified by the pēcrekultivācij parameter monitoring;

54.5. the measures taken to inform the public about the cohesion fund the project results and benefits to society.
55. The first time that rule the form set out in annex 5 shall be submitted within one year after the closing of the Cohesion Fund and the subsequent receipt of payment – once a year in accordance with the agreement for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund.
56. the responsible authority shall ensure that the storage and analysis of information on the objectives of the activity for at least five years after all the cohesion fund projects are completed within the activity, where, under the agreement for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund has not set a longer period.
XI. final question 57. These rules referred to in annex 1 to the list may be amended up to 30 April 2009.
The Prime Minister's site-traffic Minister a. Environmental Minister shlesers, Welfare Minister i. Muzzle is the Editorial Note: the entry into force of the provisions by 19 July 2008.
 
 
1. the annex to the Cabinet June 30, 2008. the Regulation No. 490 of the laws of non-compliant municipal landfills no PO box
Regional environmental administration (RVP) dump location (district municipality) dump location (local) dumps the name register of contaminated sites of Latgale planning region 1.
Daugavpils-Daugavpils-RVP Demen Demen 44508/830/PV 2.
Rēzekne-Ludza Zvirgzden Kristužān, RVP 78768/732/PPV 3.
Rezekne Rezekne Ozolain Box in the RVP 78768/732/PPV Zemgale planning region 4.
Madona-Totēn in Aizkraukle RVP Sērene 32808/5283/PPV 5.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle Beaver Trying to 32468/2636/PPV 6.
Madona Klintain of Āžukaln in Aizkraukle RVP 32588/5286/PPV 7.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle Koknese Koknese 32608/2832/PPV 8.
Madona Strobuk in Aizkraukle Castle is RVP 32748/2859/PPV 9.
Madona-Putnukaln in Aizkraukle RVP Sec 32788/5288/PPV 10.
Aizkraukle, Madona RVP of 32828 Scribe Ramziņ/2848/PPV 11.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle-Sunākst callers 3286/5285/PPV 12.
Madona Vietalv of Rūcēnkaln in Aizkraukle RVP 32928/5280/PPV 13.
Madona-Medņ in Aizkraukle Kurmen RVP 32628/2850/VPP 14.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle Kurmen strainers/2849/32628 of PPV 15.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle staburadze young 32848/5282PPV 16.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle Valle in Ziliņ/5290/32908 PPV 17.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle Valle-5291/Taurkaln/32908 PPV 18.
Madona Daudzes of Siliņkaln in Aizkraukle RVP 32508/2820/PPV 19.
Madona RVP Aizkraukle often Sir, very clever 32708/2857/PPV 20.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Prūsān Dunav-RVP 56548/844/PPV 21.
Daugavpils Mežār Stimbināj of the RVP Jēkabpils 56768 PPV/846/22.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils mountain Stareniek RVP 56668/850/PPV 23.
Daugavpils in Plaušukaln of RVP Jēkabpils Sēlpils 56908/2,133/PPV 24.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils Varieš down, the 5306/PPV Sman 56948/25.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Varieš RVP indeed 56948/5304/PPV 26.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Varieš Dimzukaln of RVP 56948/5305/PPV 27.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils RVP rubene Escrow 56828/856/PPV 28.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils aknīste Pāvulān 1 56257/838/PPV 29.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils viesīte Spurs/5300/56357 PPV of 30.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils Gārsen of Pocket/5302/PPV 56628 31.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils rite of 56808/5299/PPV Lettuce 32.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Tear of Shrieking RVP 56448/1352/PV, 33.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils-urban 56448 Tears/5338/PPV 34.
Daugavpils Atašien Trošk of the RVP Jēkabpils 56468/852/PPV 35.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Dignāj of Bander RVP 56528/1440/PPV 36.
Daugavpils RVP of Skos Called Jēkabpils 56888/1409/37 of the PPV.
Daugavpils Vīp-Polyak of RVP Jēkabpils 56968/5358/PPV 38.
Daugavpils, Jēkabpils Zas of Sīpulān RVP 56988/870/PPV 39.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils Island turnips (Gustiņ)/5303/PPV 56868 40.
Daugavpils RVP Jēkabpils Island Valley 56868/5298/PPV Kurzeme region 41.
Kuldīga, Liepāja RVP Pelči Acorn 62748/1331/PPV 42.
Baltimore, MA Ēdol Kauš in the RVP 62468/1012/VPP 43.
Baltimore, MA Gudeniek in Bigasāt in the RVP 62508 VPP/1343/44.
Liepaja-Kuldīga Kabil Grantiņ, RVP 62608/1004/VPP 45.
Liepaja-Kuldīga let Sermīt RVP 62648/1364/VPP 46.
Baltimore, MA Svill let the RVP 62648/1365/VPP 47.
Baltimore, MA-Sviķ in Padur RVP 62728/1385VPP 48.
Baltimore, MA Pūtļeļ in the RVP Renda 62808/1328/VPP 49.
Baltimore RVP Kuldīga Skrunda Skrunda 62297/1445/VPP 50.
Baltimore, MA Turlav of the Priedīškaln of the RVP 62928/1165/VPP 51.
Liepaja-Kuldīga Kurmāl RVP blacksmiths 62608/1005/VPP 52.
Baltimore, MA Kurmāl of the Escrow to RVP 62608/988/VPP 53.
Baltimore, Nīgrand Bandzer in the RVP sweet 84708/1641/VPP 54.
Baltimore, Pampāļ, Pampāļ, RVP Saldus 84768/1469/VPP 55.
Baltimore, Lutriņ, sweet Krimpj RVP (Alps)/1468VPP 84668 56.
Liepāja, Saldus Novadniek RVP Godparent (forge) 84728/1466/PERFORMANCE 57.
Baltimore Sweet Rub measured RVP graves 84828/1431/PPP 58.
Liepāja, Saldus RVP brocēni Vibster 84808/1511/PPV 59.
Baltimore, Zaņ Grieztpurv of the RVP Saldus 84948/1433/VPP Vidzeme planning region 60.
Valmiera, Valmiera Kocēni Beit RVP 96648/2160/PV of 61.
Valmiera RVP Valmiera burtnieki municipality Kulpj/2132/PPV 96708, 62.
Valmiera RVP Valka Trikāta oak 94848/3693/PPV 63.
Lakewood Grundzāl is Smiltiņsil to Valka RVP 94588/5318/PPV 64.
Lakewood Palsman is Kangarkaln to Valka RVP 94748/3137/PPV 65.
Lakewood Launkaln is Putnukaln to Valka RVP 94708/5258PPV 66.
Lakewood Vijciem is Celīš to Valka RVP 94928/5241/PPV 67.
Cēsis, Valmiera RVP Priekuļi (Baudz) Piebaudz/5240/PV 68 42728.
Valmiera-Cēsis-Kursen Skujen RVP 42788/2326/PPV 69.
Valmiera-Cēsis Vecpiebalg Veļķ, RVP 42928/2508/PPV 70.
Valmiera-Cēsis Vecpiebalg Alaukst of RVP 42928/2505/PPV 71.
Madona-Madona Liezer Vālēn RVP 70688/3040/PPV in 72.
Madona, Madona Vestien RVP broken 70968/3068/PPV 73.
Madona RVP Madona Mētrien beads/3047/70768 VPP 74.
Madona-Madona Eagles Sidrabiņ, RVP 70928/5279/PPV 75.
Madona-Madona Eagles Andrup RVP 70608/3030/PPV, 76.
Madona-Madona Eagles Lempēn, RVP 70548/3023/PPV 77.
Madona-Madona RVP varakļāni varakļāni 70948/3063/PPV 78.
Madona-Madona RVP of Ditch 70828/5289 Ošup/PPV 79.
Madona-Madona RVP Linda 70428/3006 of Arona/PPV 80.
Madona RVP for 70628 Madona Kalsnav escrow/3034/PV 81.
Madona-Madona Mārcien Sūņ, RVP 70748/5 284/PPV 82.
Madona-Madona-RVP Murmastiene Vorz 70788/3052/PPV 83.
Madona-Madona Praulien RVP Ienāškalniņš/3056/70868 PPV 84.
Madona-Madona Praulien RVP silenieki/70868 3057/PPV 85.
Madona-Madona-Jurup Praulien RVP 70868/3430/PPV 86.
Madona-Madona Laudona RVP hill people/3035/PPV 70708 87.
Madona-Madona Barkav Dubīt of RVP 70448/3013/PPV 88.
Madona-Madona Barkav Mālsal the RVP 70448/4401/PPV Riga planning region 89.
Lielrīg RVP of Riga Riga deglava Street 01944/675/90 the who.
Lielrīg RVP of OGRE damsel in Auriņ/3665/91 74488 PPV.
Lielrīg Ķilup of the OGRE in Ogresgals RVP 74808/3638/PV 92.
Valmiera RVP Limbaži braslau a forest of 6448/5238/PPV – instead of the Minister of the Environment Minister of welfare in the nose I, Ministry of the environment submitted to the annex 2 Cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 490 of rules in place of the Minister for the environment, Welfare Minister i. Muzzle attachment 3 Cabinet June 30, 2008. Regulations No 490 Project submission evaluation form no PO box
Assessment criteria 1. Quality criteria for rating points 1.
Cohesion Fund projects in the stage of maturity: must receive at least 1 point 1.1.
prepare technical specifications for works contracts for the purchase of the tender in accordance with the governing law of purchase 1 1.2.
developed and legislation procedure accepted technical project 2 2.
Implementation of the project under the Cohesion Fund in relation to the effectiveness of regulatory requirements without the corresponding dumps of conditioning: must receive at least 1 paragraph 2.1.
development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz amount exceeds 2.5% of the eligible costs of the project 1 2.2.
development of construction and related costs of the būvekspertīz amount is from 1.5% to 2.5% (inclusive) of the eligible costs of the project 2 2.3.
development of construction and related costs of the būvekspertīz amount is less than 1.5% of the eligible costs of the project 3 3.
Waste authorities, land owners (municipalities, private owners) an additional financial contribution to the project: the criterion gives additional points 3.1.
less than 5% of the Cohesion Fund project funding eligible cost part 1 3.2.
5% of the Cohesion Fund is financing the eligible cost of the project or more 2 4.
The cost of return indicators (the amount of waste landfilled (tonnes) relative to the initial total cost ($)). The average project selection round score, which is calculated for projects that meet the eligibility and administrative criteria (cost of return indicators in relation to the amount of selection round of the project): criterion gives additional points 4.1.
project cost estimate of return rate is less than the average of the calculated and the difference is more than 20% 1 2.6.

project cost estimate of return rate is less than the average of the calculated and the difference is from 10% to 20% 2 4.3.
project cost estimate of return is equal to the average of the calculated or 10% more, or less than 10% 3 4.4.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average of the calculated and the difference is from 10% to 20% 4 4.5.
project cost estimate of return is greater than the average of the calculated and the difference is more than 20% 5 1.1. criteria for the assessment of horizontal priorities points 5.
Dump category according to the hazard of the waste and potentially cause the environmental pollution (sustainable development): must be at least 1 paragraph 5.1.
Category I-dumps, which creates a potentially low risk 1 5.2.
Category II-dumps, which poses a potential risk to the average 2 5.3.
Category III – dumps which constitute a potentially high risk 3 6.
The project area development index project at the time of submission of the application (of the balanced development of the territory): the criterion gives additional points 6.1.
area development index is greater than + 0.3 1 6.2.
territorial development index is from-1.18 to + 0.3 inclusive 2 6.3.
territorial development index is less than-1.18 3 2. Eligibility 2.1. project eligibility criteria Yes/No/NA 7.
The cohesion fund the project will reduce the negative impacts of landfills, to the quality of the environment (sustainable development) N 8.
The cohesion fund the project will remove the threat of disease in the population N Yes/No 9.
Project application of the Cohesion Fund applies to the municipal dump of conditioning, which included legislative requirements not corresponding to a list of N 10 dump sites.
Waste dumping site registered contaminated and potentially contaminated sites registry N 11.
The cohesion fund the project submission complies with the activity: 11.1.
eligible activities: N 11.1.1.
activities directly related to dump 11.1.2 conditioning.
pēcrekultivācij monitoring equipment 11.2.
eligible costs: P 11.2.1.
with the environmental impact assessment (if such is required) documentation associated development costs, development of construction and related costs of būvekspertīz, but not more than 3% of the Cohesion Fund project total eligible costs amount in 11.2.2.
autoruzraudzīb costs, but not more than 0.5% of the eligible costs of the works 11.2.3.
building costs, but not more than 3% of the eligible costs of the works 11.2.4.
the cost of the works 11.2.5.
pēcrekultivācij monitoring equipment required for installation delivery cost 11.3.
not eligible costs 12.
Project application of the cohesion fund the Cohesion Fund in the project description provides the necessary information on the activities to be carried out (component): N 12.1.
given the technical characteristics of the activities to 12.2.
results and outcomes specified indicators, and they meet the purpose of the activity 12.3.
provides actions for arrangement of project area 12.4.
provides actions for qualitative and quantitative contribution to the European Union law and the laws of the Republic of Latvia on the implementation of the essential requirements for 12.5.
describe the principle of the "polluter pays", the project 13.
The cohesion fund the project time schedule meets the planned activities P 14.
The information provided in the application, stating that the applicant for the project under the cohesion fund the Cohesion Fund will ensure the project's sustainability of results: N 14.1.
have the appropriate institutional structure of 14.2.
the rekultivēt is planned to dump the State of the environment monitoring 14.3.
is or will be available for staff to ensure the rekultivēt dump the State of the environment monitoring, 15.
Cohesion Fund projects in the specified application fiziskie indicators meet the project schedule N 16.
The requested funding from the Cohesion Fund aid rate does not exceed 50% of the project total eligible costs Riga City municipality and 85% in the rest of the territory of Latvia authorities N 17.
The cohesion fund the project budgeted cost is reasonable: N 17.1.
includes all cohesion fund projects in the cost required for the positions of 17.2.
are in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework submitted by the prescribed procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price of the works developed in them to 17.3.
are reasonable and justified, specifying clear assumptions for the calculation of the cost of 17.4.
It is directly necessary for the implementation of the Cohesion Fund to 17.5.
is determined taking into account the expected market price at the time of project implementation on the basis of the data of the Central Statistical Bureau on time to the application of the project or project the applicant made a market survey 18.
The cohesion fund the project cash flow forecast is based: P 18.1.
reflect both the demand and the cost of funding the performance forecast 18.2.
meet the planned time schedule 18.3.
meet the procurement plan and contract specifics of 18.4.
meet the project's financial plan 18.5.
meets European Union fund project payment terms 19.
The Cohesion Fund is indicative of the draft procurement plan is based: P 19.1.
cover all cohesion fund project activities and services and their costs 19.2.
the work distribution is based on the treaties (corresponding to the amount of work and specification) 19.3.
timetable of implementation of the contract is justified, the purchase method you choose matches the public procurement regulatory laws 19.4.
contract deadlines, including the procurement procedure shall comply with laws and regulations and the project time schedule 20.
Cohesion Fund projects in the application reflect the planned implementation of the cohesion fund projects in the organisation chart and the planned human resources provides the statutory beneficiary of functions: P 20.1.
project management (e.g., procurement, contract administration, record keeping) 20.2.
the financial management of the project (for example, accounting and payments, financial planning) 20.3.
technical management of the project (for example, reconciliation in design and construction, work progress reporting) 21.
Cohesion Fund projects planned in the publicity and information dissemination activities comply with the laws and regulations on the cohesion fund the project publicity and information dissemination measures P 2.2. Project eligibility criteria of the applicant Yes/No/NA 22.
Cohesion Fund projects – applicant municipality – no tax liability on the application of the first working day of the month N 23.
Cohesion Fund projects, the applicant shall ensure that it has the right to carry out the works concerned, where the laws are not in appropriate waste dump: N 23.1.
the land is registered in the land registry as municipal property 23.2.
If the value is denacionalizēt, the owner of the land agreement on property use restrictions in place in the land for a period of not less than five years after the completion of the project, or for the time necessary to carry out the monitoring of the pēcrekultivācij 3. Administrative criteria yes/no/NA 24.
The cohesion fund the project application is submitted to the responsible authorities within the specified N 25.
Cohesion Fund projects, the applicant is invited to submit a project application to the N 26.
The cohesion fund the project application has been submitted according to the following requirements: N 26.1.
application has been prepared according to the application form for the activity 26.2.
the application prepared for the Latvian language 26.3.
the application is made in the text (where the application is submitted in paper form) 26.4.
the application is signed by an authorised person to 26.5.
filed one cohesion fund projects in the original and one copy, as well as the electronic version without attachments (if the application is submitted in paper form), 16.5.
and cohesion fund projects in the original and the copy submitted to the caurauklot, the attached document pages are numbered (if the application is submitted in paper form) 16.6.
The application of cohesion fund projects is presented according to the circulation of electronic documents regulations regulatory requirements (where the application is filed electronically): 26.7.1.
signed with a secure electronic signature 26.7.2.
developed in DOC, xls, PDF or JPG file format 26.7.3.
In addition to the documents to be submitted (including an electronic copy of the paper document) have been developed and designed according to the circulation of electronic documents regulations regulatory requirements 27.
The application of cohesion fund projects is fully completed N 28.
Cohesion Fund project application accompanied by all required attachments: 28.1 P.
estimate of the works in accordance with the public procurement regulatory framework the statutory procedures for the determination of the estimated contract price to 28.2.
technical specification for works contracts for the purchase of the tender in accordance with the procurement regulations governing 28.3.
municipal financing decision, which specifically provided for eligible and non-eligible costs



28.4. the municipal dump in a statement that rekultivējam has been or is being used for municipal waste management (disposal) function to 28.5.
a copy of the document certifying the right of ownership of the land on which the rekultivējam landfill in 28.6.
with the site's owner, a copy of the agreement reached on the property use restrictions in place in the land for a period of not less than five years after the completion of the project, or to the time necessary for carrying out of monitoring of pēcrekultivācij 17.8.
regulations prescribed documentation showing authorization to implement the project, the municipality if the municipality is in the process of financial stabilisation 17.9.
a copy of the credit agreement concluded or lending institution issued a copy of a document certifying that the credit of the municipality will be allocated 46.8.
The cohesion fund the project cash flow forecast, 28.10.
The cohesion fund the project procurement plan 4 indicative.
The availability of funding criteria Yes/No 29.
The cohesion fund the project priority list of projects is available on the financing of the Cohesion Fund in the legend.
N-If the assessment is negative, the project submission is rejected.
P – a decision on project approval with conditions (project applicant must ensure compliance with the criteria, making adjustments in the project submission deadline).
NA (not applicable) – criteria is not applicable to a specific project, applicant's project is not assessed in relation to these criteria.
The Minister of the environment, Welfare Minister in place of i. 4. Nose attachment Cabinet 30 June 2008 No. 490 of rules in place of the Minister for the environment, Welfare Minister i. Muzzle 5. Annex Cabinet June 30, 2008. Regulations No 490 Environment Ministers in place, Minister of welfare of the nose.