The Saeima has adopted and the President promulgated the following laws: the law of criminal procedure amendment of criminal procedure law in the Republic of Latvia (Saeima and the Cabinet of Ministers rapporteur, 2005, nr. 11, 20; 2006, nr. 4; 3, 13, 2007, no. 1, 15; 2008. no; 2009, 9, 14, 15 no; Latvian journal 2010, 19, 178. no; 2011, 117 no). the following amendments: 1. Express article 111, the second subparagraph by the following: "(2) a witness is obliged at the request of the promoters of the process in writing your receipt of shipment or electronic mail address, as well as attending officials conducting the criminal proceedings at the specified time and in a certain place and participate in the activities of the investigation if the invitations." 2. in article 111.1: Add to the name of the article after the word "right" with the words "and obligations"; to complement the article, paragraph 3 as follows: "3) legal aid lawyer be invited." to supplement the article with the second part as follows: "(2) the owners of property injured in criminal proceedings must at the request of the promoters of the process in writing your receipt of the postal mailing or electronic address and its change. In criminal proceedings the injured property owner agrees to 24 hours to receive officials conducting the criminal proceedings, sent shipments arrive without delay after the invitation of promoters or perform other duties referred kriminālprocesuālo. "; believe the current text of article about the first part.
3. Add to article 207 of the first subparagraph following the words "can be taken from" by the words "persons against whom criminal proceedings initiated from".
243. Article 4: to supplement the first part with the 1.1 and 1.2 of paragraph 1 by the following: ' 11) communication of change of residence; 12) login specified time the police; " replace the first subparagraph of paragraph 5, the word "home" with the word "place"; replace the fourth subparagraph, the numbers and the word "2. — in paragraph 4" with numbers and the word "1.1". — 4.
5. To supplement the law with article 252.1 and 252.2 as follows: "article 252.1. The change of residence of the change of residence notice communication is the suspected or accused of writing the link immediately, but not later than within one business day of writing to inform the driver of the process of change of residence, stating the new address of the place of residence. 252.2 article. Logon during the specified login to the police during certain police is to guide the process of the decision ordering the suspect or the accused within the time limit laid down in the decision to apply to the police of their place of residence. " 6. Replace the words "in Article 255 of the Latvian territory" with the word "national".
7. Article 256 of express as follows: "article 256. Specific location of residence residence in a specific location is the suspect or the accused to reside in the context of writing process Guide for a specified time and place specified or does not leave more than 24 hours in certain specified life or temporary residence without the permission of the promoters of the process, as well as to attend without delay after the invitation of promoters or other kriminālprocesuālo. " 8. in article 261: express the fourth paragraph as follows: "(4) to check the movement of persons and freedom of action in respect of restrictions, police officers have the right to visit the residence of persons specified in the decision on the front door. A person has the responsibility to check during the open front door of the residence and found them police officers on sight until the inspection is complete. '; to supplement the article with a fifth by the following: "(5) in order to verify the person's discretion — limits the prohibition to meet with the persons referred to in the decision — compliance, police officers have the right to enter and the person is obliged to allow police officers to enter its permanent or temporary residence (apartment, House)." 9. Supplement article 262, the first subparagraph of paragraph 6 and 7 by the following: ' 6) the obligation at a specific time to apply to the police; 7) stay in a certain place. " 10. in article 277: replace the third paragraph, the words "until the completion of the proceedings before the Court of first instance" by the words "to the Court of first instance ruling to compose a full"; supplemented with the sentence of the third paragraph as follows: "If the appeal or cassation instance Court annulled the conviction judgment and sent the case to a new Court of first instance, the period of detention should include the time of the appeal or cassation instance court ruling to the pronouncement of the Court of first instance ruling full."; Add to article 5.1 part as follows: "(51) a Person suspected or accused of the less serious crime against dzimumneaizskaramīb and morals, if it is committed against minors, detention shall not exceed 12 months, of which the pre-trial process allowed to hold the person in custody for a period not exceeding six months. The investigating judge in the pre-trial process and higher trial court judge during each period can be extended for another month if the driver has not made a process unwarranted delay or if the person who implemented the defense, have deliberately been very reluctant in progress, or if the process faster completion was not possible for the special complexity. " 281. Article 11: turn off the fourth part of the third sentence; to make a fifth by the following: "(5) an application for the cancellation or modification of custody, or the need for further evaluation of the application of the following referral to the Court of appeal until the start of the proceedings can be filed only if: 1) has incurred any health or family circumstances that may give rise to the cancellation or modification of custody, and these facts attest documents; 2) trial is set to start a period of more than two months after the receipt of the case in court. "; Add to article 5.1 and 5.2 of part with the following: "(51) in the fifth subparagraph of this article the said application shall be considered the appellate court judge in written procedure within three working days. The application review is not a basis for rejection of the application judge. (52) If, after the commencement of the hearing of the case the appellate court hearing is postponed or declared to be a break for a period longer than two months, the Court of appeal at the same time assess the application further detention. "
12. Article 293: replace the third paragraph, the words "the decision to appeal" with the words "submit a request for exemption from compulsory cash payment or for a reduction in the amount"; to supplement the article with the fourth paragraph as follows: "(4) the judge's examination and the Court decision may not be appealed." 13. Express 294. article as follows: "article 294. Request for exemption from compulsory payment of money or a reduction in the amount of (1) the Person who applied the forced money, 10 days after the decision on the application of the compulsory copies of cash receipts can ask to be exempted from the compulsory cash pay or reduce the amount. The request for the investigation, the judge's decision shall be submitted to the district (municipal) Court to the President of the Court decision — the same court that imposed forced money. (2) the request to examine the writing process in 10 days. The decision may not be appealed. " 14. Express article 295, the first paragraph by the following: "(1) If the person to whom the compulsory cash, applied has not submitted a request to release it from the forced payment of money or reduce its amount or submit request rejected, they are obliged within 10 days of notification of the decision or reject the request voluntarily pay the money." 15. To supplement the article with 321. fourth and fifth by the following: "(4) in the cases specified by law, by notice to the person to be adopted, a copy of the judgment or ruling the communication can be sent to a person in receipt of the consignment specified postal or electronic address. (5) where a copy of the judgment or ruling adopted notice delivered by mail to the person, it is considered that the ruling party has announced the seventh day after the transfer of the copy or the notice in the mail. If a copy of the judgment or ruling adopted by the notice to the person conveyed by electronic mail, it is considered that the ruling party has announced the second working day after copies thereof or of dispatch of the notice. " 16. in article 339: to supplement the first part with the words, "If this article is not otherwise provided for; Add to the second part of the sentence the following wording: "the complaint about the conduct of investigators or prosecutors may submit within 10 days from the actual date of the finding of conduct." 17. To supplement the article with 342.5.1 part as follows: "(51) If the content of the complaint as regards the complaints already examined in the legal or factual circumstances have not changed in nature, is not considered the complaint and shall notify the applicant."

368. Article 18: replace the first paragraph, the words "in the fourth and fifth" with the words "the fourth, fifth and sixth"; replace the sixth paragraph, the words "civil law" with the words "during the pre-trial proceedings, trial, and the Court or the Prosecutor's final ruling in criminal proceedings prescribed in this Act". 19. To complement the chapter with 29 and article 368.2 368.1 as follows: "article 368.1. With investigations or hearings associated procedural costs of suspension-drive (1) pre-trial proceedings, a process in the process established by this law, the sixth subparagraph of article 368 of these procedural expenses, may propose to the investigating judge to decide on their recovery from persons that the enquiries were suspended. Process guide suggestion shall be accompanied by documents certifying the investigations and procedural costs. (2) the investigating judge of the decision taken by sending a copy of it, notify the driver of the process and the resulting investigation work was deferred. (3) during the hearing of the decision concerning the procedural expenses, which are associated with the suspension of the hearings, the Court adopted. (4) the judge's investigation and the decision of the Court for procedural expenditure driven person can appeal to the higher court. The complaint may require repealing Decision generally, exempt a person from payment of procedural expenses or reduce its amount. (5) the superior court judge review the written complaint process. The decision is not appealable. (6) the question of procedural costs recovery of this law in the first part of article 368. persons referred to in this law, shall decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 368. the Court or the Prosecutor's final ruling in the criminal proceedings. Article 368.2. With investigations or hearings be postponed procedural expenses related to the recovery of the execution (1) if the person is not in this law article 368.1 lodge order of the decisions on procedural costs drive or submit complaint rejected, must, within 30 days of notification of the decision rejecting the complaint or willingly pay these expenses. (2) If the decision is not executed voluntarily, injunctions for the recovery of expenditure sent a procedural execution of sworn bailiffs. " 20. Supplement article 389. the fourth paragraph as follows: "(4) from the date of the driver of the process betrayed the district (City) Court decision in criminal proceedings to get things started, and then attached materials, until the day when the Court ruling for goods on the entry into force of the law will stop the restriction period in respect of which the property started as a criminal to get belongings." 21. Supplement article 5.1 part 392.1 as follows: "(51) this Law 369. the second paragraph of article 2 and in paragraph 4, the persons and the referred persons whose rights were violated given in criminal proceedings, the decision on the process of the criminal proceedings terminated a copy or issue at their request." 22. Supplement article 435 with 7.1 points as follows: ' 71) to submit objections to the trial writing process; ". 23. To complement the 436. the second paragraph of article 4.1 of the point as follows: "41) to submit objections to the trial writing process;". 24. the express Article 442. by the following: ' Article 442. Instance proceedings in criminal matters (1), district (City) Court hears all criminal cases as Court of first instance. Riga City Vidzeme suburb Court, as the Court of first instance has jurisdiction in criminal matters, which include materials containing State secrets. (2) the appeal of order under appeal of district (City) Court ruling district court appearance as the appellate court. (3) an appeal in cassation appeal any court ruling the Supreme Court Senate appearance as the cassation instance court. " 25. To complement the 449. the third paragraph of article with the sentence as follows: "the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings the Court noted the written evidence and documents checked at the hearing only if the person implementing the defence, the Prosecutor and the victim or his representative made the following requests." 26. Express 457. the first paragraph by the following: "(1) If a prosecutor fails to appear at the hearing, the criminal trial postponed. If the criminal trial of several prosecutors and not come to any of them, the trial can continue. The hearing may continue even if some of the prosecutors with the Office of the Prosecutor's consent, not higher arrived at the debate. " 27. Supplement article 463. third paragraph after the words "the Court may decide" with the words "for the forced application of the money." 28. Supplement article 464 after ' for the criminal offence of "with the words" and less serious crime ". 465. Article 29: Add to the first paragraph, after the word "away" with the words "(in absentia)"; make the second paragraph as follows: "(2) a judicial decision taken by those in the accused's absence (in absentia), shall enter into force on the General agenda. However, the convict can appeal against the ruling of the higher court of appeal or appeal in cassation within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the ruling. From the time when the complaint is received by the Court, the convict the accused obtained status and all the rights of the accused. The Court of first instance, the judge shall decide the question of the suspension of the execution of judgments and the application of the security features. " 30. Express article following 467: "467. article. Consequences of the absence of the defenders (1) if the defendant did not appear at the hearing, the criminal trial postponed. For a absences of defenders at the hearing the Court shall notify the Latvian Council of sworn advocates. (2) If criminal proceedings have accused several defenders and not come to any of them, the trial can continue. The hearing may continue even if one of the defenders did not appear at the debate, and the accused did not object to the continuation of the case. " 31. Supplement 470. the second paragraph of article with the sentence the following wording: "the witness may also be applied to the forced arrival." 32.476. Article: Supplement to article 2.1 part as follows: "(21) the decision on the adoption of the Division of criminal procedure cannot be the basis for rejection of the application judge dealt in criminal proceedings." to complement the fifth sentence with the following: "court hearing resumed in criminal proceedings, if the dedicated court composition is not changed, not repeated before the Court in the proceedings in which the accused participated." 33. To supplement the article with 481 1.1 part as follows: "(11) If the accused died during the proceedings before the Court of first instance, the proceedings continue only if, one month after the death of the accused has received the application for the deceased loved ones, the continuation of the criminal proceedings in the rehabilitation of the dead. The hearing is continued in the General order. The person who requested the continuation of the proceedings has the right to appeal against the Court of first instance and the appeal court's decision. "
34.484. Article: Supplement third paragraph 6 by the following: "6) Protocol the accessibility day."; to complement the fourth paragraph by the words "Court debate speech, replicas, accused the last word"; to make the eighth part of the third sentence by the following: "the public prosecutor, the parties, in the exercise of the defense, and the victim may be familiar with the Protocol, if necessary, to receive a copy of the minutes and within three working days of the date of availability of the Protocol, to submit comments on it." 35. To complement the 496. the third paragraph of article with the words "if new conditions are indicated, which previously was not known". 36. Add to article 506 of the fourth subparagraph, the first sentence with the words "and the written evidence and documents specified in the decision on the transfer of criminal proceedings and the Court in accordance with this law, the third subparagraph of article 449 was not tested in court". 37. off the second part of article 510.
38. To complement the 512 the second part of the article after the word "hearing" with the words "and the written evidence and documents specified in the decision on the transfer of Criminal Court" and after the word "or" with the word "evidence". 39. the third paragraph of article 530: replace the words "valid reasons" with the words "the extent of the case, the legal complexity or other objective circumstances"; Add to part with the sentence the following wording: "the full Court ruling can be postponed only once."
40. the first subparagraph of article 539: Add to part with a new second sentence as follows: "the judge valued the agreement concluded for the penalty only if it finds that the designated penalty is proportionate to the nature of the offence and the damage caused." Add to part with the words, "and his decision may not be appealed". 41. To supplement the law with article 540.1 as follows: "article 540.1. Criminal trial process agreed in writing

(1) the judge may decide to trial the writing process. (2) the decision on accepting a case for hearing the written procedure specifies: 1) the Prosecutor, the accused, counsel and the victim for 10 days to sign up for the rejection of the Court's composition and to submit objections to the trial writing process; 2) accessibility days of the award. (3) the Use of the written procedure after the appearance of existing materials. (4) If an objection to the trial the written procedure submitted by the Prosecutor, the accused, counsel or the victim, the Court shall take a decision on the trial hearing process. The decision to try the case in the oral procedure, the Court may adopt on their own initiative. (5) the Court, having reviewed the case in written procedure, adopt one of the following decisions: 1) the decision on the termination of the proceedings if it is established that the conditions do not allow for criminal proceedings; 2) decision on the transmission of the case to Prosecutor misconduct; 3) conviction judgments; 4) decision on trial in General, if the accused waives the agreement. (6) the Court shall make a judgment of conviction, subject to the terms of the judgment, a hearing orally agreed to the process. (7) in the fifth subparagraph of this article, order in the Court judgment subject to further appeal in cassation only. " 42. Make 542. the first paragraph of article 6 paragraph 4 by the following: "4) decision on trial in General, if the accused waives the agreement." 43. To complement the 553. the third paragraph with the words "as well as if it has not complied with this law, in article 551 fourth and fifth conditions". 44. Supplement article 559 fourth with 2.1 as follows: "21) appeal or protest is requested only for the compensation of damages, and if the public prosecutor or the person in whose interests and rights complaint or protest, objection touch;". 45. Add to article 564 of the seventh part with a new second sentence as follows: "If the Court adopts this Law 563 of the first paragraph of article 5 or paragraph 1.1 parts provided for in paragraph 3 of the decision, it shall decide on the matter." 46. To supplement the article with 585 3.1 part as follows: "(31) If the cassation instance court shall adopt this law 587. the first paragraph of article 6 of the decision provided for in paragraph 2, it shall decide on the matter." 47.629. Supplementing the second subparagraph with the following sentence: "the absence of the person invited is not an obstacle for the decision on the adoption of property if the person inviting." 48.673. in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3: turn off; Add to part with point 4.1 as follows: "41) not involving deprivation of liberty of execution;". 49. To supplement the law with article 679.1 as follows: "article 679.1. The exchange of information about ongoing criminal proceedings in Latvia for the same criminal offence (1) If there are reasonable grounds for believing that in Latvia at the ongoing criminal proceedings in another country takes place in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence and the result of international cooperation in the above not obtain sufficient confirmation process with promoters through the competent authority to provide for the foreign contact information. Process request of promoters stating this Law 678. the information referred to in the article. Request to translate the relevant Member State of the European Union in the national language or languages, which the national communications indicated to the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union. (2) the competent authority has received from the foreign State a request for information on whether Latvia going criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence, provided that the foreign state information within the time limit specified in the request, but, if the deadline is not specified, the information shall be provided as soon as possible after receipt of the request. (3) Information as to whether the foreign State takes place in Latvia, criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence: 1) the contact details of the promoters of the process; 2) information on whether going on or has happened in criminal proceedings for the same offence and that is linked to it is the same person; 3) If criminal proceedings take place in Latvia for the same offence, criminal proceedings or, if the matter is final judgment, the nature of this ruling. (4) the exchange of information during the pre-litigation procedure, the competent authority is the General Prosecutor's Office, but until the initiation of prosecution, the State police. After referral to the Court by the competent authority for the exchange of information is the Ministry of Justice. " 50.684. in the first paragraph: to express the point 1 and 2 by the following: "1) certified the decision on security features — — the application of pre-trial detention or the existing copy of the judgment of conviction; 2) certified the decision on recognition of a person as a suspect or a copy of the criminal prosecution; " make paragraph 4 by the following: "4) certify the order for enforcement of the judgment copy;". 51. To complement the 696. the first paragraph after the words "If" with the words "request for temporary custody or". 52. in article 713: Supplement to article 1.1 part as follows: "(11) a person is entitled to be issued to waive the right to be called to criminal liability only for those convicted and criminal offences for which it is issued. '; make the second paragraph as follows: "(2) the person to be your consent for the release of the simplified procedure and denial of the right to be called to criminal liability only for those convicted and criminal offences for which it is issued, confirms the presence of a lawyer, public prosecutor before a decision on the admissibility of extradition." Add to article 3.1 part as follows: "to be issued to a person (31) on the issue of consent to the simplified procedure may be withdrawn until a decision is taken in accordance with the fourth paragraph of this article, but the denial of the right to be called to criminal liability only for those convicted and criminal offences for which it is issued, be picked up to the surrender of the person." 53. To supplement the article with 715 3.1 part as follows: "(31) If the person to be picked above was not informed that the criminal proceedings initiated against the Member State of the European Union and adopted its absence (in absentia), that person may request a copy of the judgment shall be issued to it. At the request of the person issuing the General Prosecutor's Office asked the Member States of the European Union, to ensure the availability of the judgment. Following the request of the person to be issued to prevent its release. " 54. the sixteenth section Expressed as follows: "the sixteenth section. Foreign judgment recognition and enforcement of penalties chapter 69. General provisions for the execution of the punishment imposed in a foreign country in Latvia 749. article. Foreign country sentenced to the penalty of execution (1) sentenced to penal enforcement abroad in Latvia is fine and this merits the unchallenged rule of the recognition and enforcement of the same order as if the punishment would be determined in the course of criminal proceedings in Latvia. (2) the penalty imposed abroad eligibility and recognition of the rule of law does not preclude its alignment with the sanctions provided for in the criminal law for the same offence. 750. article. Foreign country sentenced to penal enforcement conditions (1) sentenced to penal enforcement abroad is possible if: 1 the foreign) submitted a request for it under penalties of execution; 2) punishment in a foreign country specified in the judgment which has the force of res judicata in criminal proceedings completed; 3) fines do not barred nor foreign country, not in Latvia; 4) the sentenced person is a foreign citizen of Latvia or its permanent place of residence is in Latvia, in Latvia, or served with a custodial penalty and a foreign country convicted with imprisonment or arrest, which could be executed immediately after the sentence imposed in Latvia; 5) could not run foreign punishment, even asking for extradition; 6) fine execution in Latvia promote foreign country convicted person resocializācij. (2) a foreign country sentenced to fines or confiscation of property may also be accomplished if a foreign country convicted person owns property or have other income in Latvia. 751. article. Request for execution of fines imposed abroad in a foreign State the reasons for the refusal are sentenced to the penalty of execution of a request may be refused if: 1) has reason to believe that a certain person a fine race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or political views, or if the offence constitutes a political or military; 2) penalty enforcement would be contrary to the international obligations of Latvia against another State; 3) fine could harm Latvia's national sovereignty, security, public order or other essential interests; 4 convicted persons abroad) for the same offence could be punished under criminal law; 5) penalty enforcement would be contrary to the fundamental principles of the legal system of Latvia; 6) in Latvia is going for the same criminal offence for which the punishment imposed in a foreign country; 7) fine execution in Latvia; 8) has been made an offence in a foreign country, which ordered the executable; 9) punishment enforcement expenses are not proportionate to the gravity of the crime and injury; 10) foreign itself able to execute judgment; 11) Latvia with no contract on the second foreign country ordered soda. 752. article. Limitation of enforcement penalties

(1) a foreign country ordered the penalty to be executed in Latvia restricts both the fine provided for in the criminal law enforcement is barred, and the relevant foreign law enforcement penalties provided for limitation periods. (2) the circumstances which affect the flow of time abroad to the same extent it affects in Latvia. 753. article. Double-judged not permissible in Latvia does not fulfil a sentence abroad in a foreign country, if the convicted person for the same offence in Latvia suffered from a third country or a sentence has been convicted without penalty, from released under amnesty or pardon or is eligible for the same offence. 754. article. The order in which the appearance of a foreign country are sentenced to the penalty of execution of requests (1) the Ministry of Justice, received a sentence of a foreign request for the execution of the penalty of 10 days, but if the material is particularly large, the check within 30 days, or has received all required materials. (2) if the required documents, at the request of a foreign check occurs is referred to in the first subparagraph within the time after receipt of the translation. (3) If you receive multiple foreign requests for those sentenced to penal enforcement abroad in respect of the same person or belongings, the Ministry of Justice combines this request inspection in one process. (4) After examination of the request materials sent to the district (municipal) Court decision on recognition of a foreign judgment and sentence enforcement in Latvia. Judge hears request to a foreign country of residence of the convicted person. If a person's place of residence is unknown, the request of a foreign-looking district (City) Court judge after the Justice Ministry locations. (5) if the foreign information provided is not sufficient, the Ministry of Justice or the Court of Justice to the Ministry of Justice may request additional information or documents, the filing deadline. 755. article. Foreign country person's absence (in absentia) sentenced to penal enforcement request (1) where a judgment of a foreign State, other than a member of the European Union, given the person's absence (in absentia) and Latvia with the foreign country is an agreement on the person's absence (in absentia) ordered the execution of the penalty, the Court shall, before taking a decision on the recognition of foreign judgments to the enforcement and fines in Latvia, shall issue the relevant foreign country convicted person statement that indicates that: 1 the request for enforcement of a fine) presented by foreign Latvia, which has the contract for this person's absence abroad (in absentia) ordered the execution of punishment; 2) foreign country convicted person shall have the right within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notification to submit an application for its absence (in absentia) heard the case in the presence of the relevant foreign State or in Latvia; 3) fine will be aligned and executed the General order, if 30 days will not be required in the case of a foreign State or in Latvia in the presence of the convicted person or the application will be rejected due to the absence of the person. (2) in the first subparagraph for the application of the person submitted to the Court. If the application does not specify the country of the proceedings, their appearance in Latvia. (3) the Ministry of Justice with a copy of the notice of issue of this notice in a foreign country, a convicted person shall without delay forward to the relevant foreign State. 756. article. Absent abroad (in absentia) the convicted person filing the relevant foreign country (1) If a foreign country absent (in absentia) the sentenced person shall be submitted within the time limit set by the law, requiring the application to reconsider the case in the presence of the foreign country, which imposed the fine, the Court shall, at the request of the foreign State for the execution of penalties. (2) If a foreign country under the first paragraph of this article the application is cancelled, held to be invalid or inadmissible, the Court shall, after receipt of the request for information relevant to the enforcement of the punishment imposed in a foreign country looking in the same order as if the thing to be considered in the presence of the person. (3) If the application results in a conviction, the Court judgment is cancelled by the Ministry of justice a foreign request for penalty execution of pending sends to the requesting State. (4) If a foreign country absent (in absentia) the sentenced person in Latvia is in the temporary custody of the foreign request, this person is referred to the foreign State concerned by the application of its presence. In this case, the question of the person holding custody further decides that the State imposed a fine. (5) if the absent abroad (in absentia) a convicted person who has submitted the application to the State, which imposed the fine, arrested in connection with another criminal proceedings or serving punishment for other offences, the Court with the Ministry of Justice informs the foreign country and ask the police to match the time when people can put the foreign State concerned participation in the examination of the application. (6) if the foreign law in a foreign country so allows, absent (in absentia) the sentenced person may participate in the examination of the application, using the technical means. Participation, through technical measures do not affect the foreign country convicted person procedural rights in a foreign country in the ongoing process. If the person's legal aid lawyer, invited a foreign lawyer shall have the right to meet with that person's confidential conditions in Latvia and, together with the customer to participate in the examination of the application, using the technical means. (7) a foreign lawyer shall not affect this inviting foreign country absent (in absentia) the convicted person the right to legal aid in Latvia. 757. article. Absent abroad (in absentia) the convicted person filing for Latvia and arbitration proceedings (1) If a foreign country absent (in absentia) the sentenced person requesting examination of an application to a court in Latvia, the Ministry of Justice after the receipt of the information from the Court shall immediately inform the relevant foreign country. (2) the summons in the absence of a foreign country (in absentia) the sentenced person shall be served not later than 21 days before the date of examination of the application, unless that person has not given an unequivocal consent to the shorter term. (3) the results of the examination, the Court shall adopt one of the following decisions: 1) rejecting the application because of the absence of the person and on the foreign judgment recognition and enforcement penalty in Latvia;
2) in the absence of a foreign country (in absentia) the application of the person convicted.
(4) adopted by the third part of this article referred to in paragraph 2 of the decision, the Court shall send it to the Ministry of Justice, which asked foreign country send this required possession with foreign crime trial related materials, setting a deadline until which the materials are to be sent. The Ministry of Justice, received from foreign materials, ensure translation and scored them according to this law, chapter 67 of the said conditions and arrangements. If a person is suitable for temporary detention, apply this law referred to in article 732 procedural time limits.
(5) the evidence, obtained in a foreign country specified in the procedural order, measured as derived in Latvia. 758. article. Foreign country specific out-of-court penalties (ordonnance penale) execution of the request for arbitration proceedings (1) the international agreements in the cases provided for foreign country out-of-Court set fines in Latvia in the same order as the result of a hearing ordered soda. (2) on receiving a request for out-of-court penalties enforcement laid down in Latvia, the Court shall issue to the person a foreign country specific penalty statement indicates that: 1) the request for a foreign country under penalties of execution lodged by the foreign country to which Latvia is a contract for the second in the country in certain out-of-court penalties enforcement; 2) 30 days, upon application to the competent authority of Latvia, a person may request a court hearing on a foreign country or in Latvia; 3) fine will be aligned and executed the General order, if 30 days will not be required in the proceedings in the Court in the presence of the person or the application will be rejected due to its absence. (3) the application for out of court penalties laid down in legal proceedings has the same effects and the subsequent arbitration proceedings as the application, if the penalty imposed on the convicted foreign person's absence (in absentia). 759. article. Foreign country under penalties of recognition and enforcement (1) the district (City) Court judge within 30 days of the written procedure of a foreign request for appearance in a foreign country under penalties of execution and, after assessing the conditions and reasons for the refusal, adopt one of the following decisions: 1) for agreeing to recognize a foreign country judgment and execute sentenced penalty; 2) waiver to recognize and enforce foreign judgments ordered soda. (2) If a foreign order refers to two or more offences, not all of which are such that the punishment may be executed in Latvia, the judge demands to specify which part of the fine relates to offences that meet these requirements. (3) in the first subparagraph, that decision may not be appealed, and the judge of the decision taken shall notify the person convicted abroad and with the Ministry of Justice, the foreign State and the convicted person, if it is located in a foreign country. 760. article. In Latvia the penalty executed discovery

(1) After this law 759 of the first paragraph of article 1 of the decision referred to in the judge in Latvia the penalty determined by the executable writing process if the objection to a foreign country the sentenced person and the Prosecutor.
(2) the foreign court ruling found actual conditions and personal guilt is binding on the Court of Latvia. (3) the penalties laid down in Latvia must not aggravate the situation of the convicted person in a foreign country, but it should comply with the relevant foreign country specified punishment. (4) at the same time with the announcement of this law, the first paragraph of article 229 of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall inform the judge convicted foreign person and the Prosecutor on the right within 10 days from the date of receipt of the notification to submit objections to the action to be executed in Latvia, the writing process, sign up for a rejection of the judge, to submit views on the penalty to be executed, as well as the availability date of the decision. (5) If a foreign country convicted person serving a custodial sentence in the requesting State, the person concerned of the fourth paragraph of this article, those rights shall inform immediately after its arrival in Latvia. (6) If a foreign country convicted person or the Prosecutor has filed an objection to the action be executed in Latvia, in the written procedure, the judge shall decide this law 651. Article If a foreign country the sentenced person detained in a foreign country or being served with a custodial penalty in the foreign country and decided the issue of the penalty to be executed in Latvia, not involving the deprivation of liberty, discovery, participation used technical means or requesting the transfer of a person to Latvia at the time. (7) a judge's decision on Latvia executable action in a foreign country convicted person or the Prosecutor within 10 days from the date of availability of the decision can be appealed to the Senate of the Supreme Court in cassation. (8) the complaint in the same manner as a cassation complaint or a protest lodged in Latvia and in the ongoing criminal proceedings, to the extent permitted by international agreements binding on Latvia and this chapter. (9) If the judge's decision on the penalty to be executed in Latvia, determination of the law have not been appealed or decision appealed and the Supreme Court, the Senate left it in force, of this law, the execution of decisions referred to in article 634. The decision to add the foreign request. 761. article. Foreign judgment in Latvia in compliance with criminal proceedings (1) in determining the sentence in criminal proceedings in Latvia, the person in respect of which the requested foreign State for enforcement of a punishment in Latvia, in Latvia, the executable is added to the finance charge in a foreign country for the punishment imposed under the criminal law provisions on the determination of the penalty after several rulings. (2) an offence in criminal law offence after the qualification, for which Latvia is executed in a foreign country, the penalty imposed shall have the same meaning as for the appearance of the offence in Latvia in the ongoing criminal proceedings. 762. article. The legal consequences of a foreign country are sentenced to the penalty of execution in Latvia (1) in Latvia to fulfill the punishment imposed in a foreign country, the execution takes place in the same order as in the criminal proceedings held in Latvia under penalties of execution. (2) a person adopted in Latvia refers to pardon and Amnesty and conditional early release conditions, as well as the respective foreign decisions on punishment reduction, amnesty or pardon. (3) the right to review the judgment is only the State in which the judgment was given. (4) enforcement of Fines and suspended sentences of a foreign request for the execution of the relevant foreign State annulled a decision on abolition of the judgment of conviction. (5) notification of Foreign in the second and fourth subparagraphs legal facts receives and organizes the performance of the Ministry of Justice. If the foreign decision contains sexually explicit information on the execution of the penalty of immediate termination or expiry date, it shall be made available to the enforcement authority of the fine, but in other cases, the Court that decides the judgment enforcement issues. (6) a Person served with a custodial penalty immediately released as soon as the information on the abolition of the judgment of conviction, if not received at foreign request for temporary custody application in the cases provided for in this section. 763. article. Notice of the Ministry of Justice in a foreign State (1) the Ministry of Justice shall notify the foreign State that its request for an appropriate sentence in a foreign country transferred for enforcement of a district (City) Court. (2) after notification of the Ministry of Justice informs the foreign: 1) of the decision to recognise and enforce judgments in a foreign country, the penalty imposed; 2 refusal to recognise a judgment) and to execute the punishment imposed in a foreign country;
3) for a decision on the action to be executed in Latvia; 4 amnesty and pardon) for a decision; 5) on completion of the execution of the fine; 6) if the foreign State has requested a special report. (3) in relation to a foreign State rulings that sentenced to a custodial penalty, the Ministry of Justice in addition to the first and second statements referred to inform the foreign on: 1) early release at the beginning and end, if the State where the judgment, the request; 2) the convicted person escapes from prison. (4) in relation to a foreign State, a decision that fined, the Ministry of Justice in addition to the first and second statements referred to inform the foreign on: 1) the replacement of the fine; 2) inability to carry out the ruling. (5) foreign rulings in which the seizure of property, the Ministry of Justice in addition to the first and second statements referred to inform the foreign on: 1) the decision on the confiscation of property of the impossibility of execution; 2) decision on the confiscation of property, in whole or in part. (6) in relation to a foreign State rulings that suitable alternative sanction, the Ministry of Justice in addition to the first and second statements referred to inform Member States of the European Union on alternative sanctions if it does not comply with the relevant European Union Member State certain alternative sanctions. 70. chapter. Foreign country sentenced to a custodial penalty enforcement in Latvia 764. article. The Foundation of a foreign country are sentenced with custodial penalty enforcement in Latvia (1) basis to meet foreign country sentenced to a custodial penalty (deprivation of liberty) in Latvia are: 1) the Justice Ministry's request to put Latvia abroad are sentenced to a custodial sentence and the execution of these foreign acceptance; 2) request to take over at the foreign sentenced to a custodial penalty and Justice Ministry approval. (2) the provisions of this chapter shall apply regardless of whether the foreign country the sentenced person is located in a foreign country or in Latvia. 765. article. Foreign country sentenced to custodial sentences enforcement options in Latvia (1), the Ministry of Justice, pursuant to this law, the procedure laid down in article 763 shall take the steps provided for in this chapter, if the foreign information or request or on their own initiative. (2) If a foreign country or its agents of the convicted person's request, the Ministry of Justice take the request within 20 days, if necessary, by requesting additional information in order to evaluate the opportunity to submit a request to the foreign State for the sentenced to custodial sentences enforcement in Latvia. 766. article. Conditions in a foreign country are sentenced to a custodial sentence for Latvia, in addition to the enforcement of this law, 750. the conditions referred to in article abroad are sentenced to a custodial sentence enforcement in Latvia is possible if at the time of receipt of the request in the relevant foreign country convicted person remaining at least six months to a custodial sentence. In exceptional cases a person can take to the sentence even if the sentence is less than six months. 767. article. The consent of the convicted person in a foreign country in its takeover of a custodial sentence in Latvia

(1) a foreign country convicted person in a foreign country serving a custodial sentence, the sentence may be taken over in Latvia, with the consent of the person. (2) a person convicted abroad can take penal in Latvia without the consent of the person concerned, if: 1) this person is in Latvia; 2) this person she'd fled abroad and the sentence arrived in Latvia and foreign countries concerned is requested to provide penal in Latvia; 3 judgment or administrative decision) has an order of removal or deportation of a person from this foreign person concerned, release from prison; 4) there is reason to believe that, taking into account the person's age or physical or mental condition, taking over for sentence is required, and if it agrees with the foreign representative of the convicted person. (3) a foreign country convicted person subject to expulsion or deportation, taking over without this consent, if the request is accompanied by a foreign person concerned view of their transfer, expulsion or deportation order, a copy of this law, and there is the rest of the article. 766 768. article. The transfer of a convicted person in a foreign country (1) adopted this law 759 of the first paragraph of article 1 of the decision referred to in paragraph and received the consent of the foreign State to transfer convicted persons in a foreign country for a custodial sentence, court instructing the Latvia State police, in coordination with the foreign, to take over the party. After the arrival of the person convicted abroad of Latvia shall immediately notify the Court and the parties in the investigation of the prison until a decision is taken on the imposition of the fine run in Latvia. (2) a foreign country convicted person please fix this foreign medical coercive means, takes over after the decision of the medical establishment of coercive measures in accordance with this law, article 769. Fifth. 769. article. In Latvia the executable a custodial sentence (1) Latvia executable custodial sentence this law determines in Article 760. (2) If the penalty established by a foreign court and the Mayor does not meet the Criminal penalty for the same offence, the Court amended the penalty for the same criminal offence under the criminal code, subject to the following conditions: 1) fine and the Mayor may not exceed the maximum laid down in the criminal code penalties for the same offence; 2) fine and the Mayor should conform to the judgment; 3 criminal law penalty laid down in) minimum limit is irrelevant. (3) the Court's decision on Latvia executable custodial sentence detection determines: 1) continuation of the sentence and the fine izciešam; 2 in custody and imprisoned) spent time transfer, which does not take into account the foreign judgment; either the executable part 3) if such additional penalty provided for under criminal law. (4) a foreign State against a custodial sentence may be replaced by a fine. (5) If a foreign country person mental disorders or mental retardation is not penalized by the criminal, but it is applied to other custodial measures, court rules on medical coercive means such person pursuant to this Act 603. in the first subparagraph. 770. article. Foreign country convicted persons in detention (1) the Ministry of Justice may ask police to detain for up to 72 hours in a foreign country convicted the person convicted of the offence in that arrest should be permitted in Latvia in the ongoing process, if: 1) foreign announces its intention to invite the sentence of the execution of custodial sentences and asked to arrest persons in connection with the avoidance of punishment;
2) Ministry of Justice sees a possibility that a foreign country the sentenced person in respect of whom that foreign submitted a request for it in the custodial sentence imposed to be executed to avoid participation in the hearing of the action to be executed in Latvia; 3) the Ministry of Justice believes that the absence (in absentia) convict, while free, will interfere with the criminal proceedings; 4 execute the requested foreign State) ordered the custodial sentence and arrest the person due to its avoidance of punishment. (2) a Detained person if released under the first paragraph of this article within the time it is not suitable for temporary custody. (3) If a person is detained in the first part of this article referred to in paragraph 1, the Ministry of Justice shall immediately inform foreign and asked to send an application for it in the custodial sentence imposed to be executed in Latvia, 18 days from the date of the person's detention. 771. article. Foreign country convicted person temporary custody (1) If a person arrested in this law article 770 cases, the Ministry of Justice submitted a proposal to the investigating judge to apply temporary custody. (2) the judge's suggestion for the application of temporary custody of this law, examine 735. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article. Temporary custody may not exceed one year from the moment of detention. (3) temporary custody may also be applied to a judge who hears an application for a foreign country under a custodial sentence to be executed, if there is reason to believe that the sentenced person will avoid a trial. (4) a Person released from temporary custody if: 1) foreign 18 days from the date of detention has not submitted a request for it in the custodial sentence imposed to be executed together with the necessary attachments; 2), the Court found that the penalty execution in Latvia; 3) Latvia establishing court enforceable penalties not imposed as a security measure of detention; 4) circumstances that exclude persons holding in custody. 772. article. The application of the security features by setting the executable in Latvia the penalty, the Court decision until the entry into force and enforcement of orders for penalty for picking may be applied to any safety feature in the same order as in the ongoing criminal proceedings in Latvia. 773. article. The expulsion of the person subject to the legal consequences of the transfer (1) the expulsion of a subject, for which penal in Latvia without its consent, should not be held criminally liable, the trial or put a sentence for other offences committed before that person's takeover, except for offences for which accepted the judgment enforceable. (2) the first subparagraph of this article shall not apply where: 1) received sentences of foreign piesprieduš permit prosecution, trial or enforcement of penalty; 2) person after release 45 days left of Latvia; 3) person has left Latvia and returned to it again. 71. chapter. Member State of the European Union ruling that sentenced to a custodial penalty enforcement in Latvia 774. article. Member State of the European Union ruling that sentenced to a custodial penalty enforcement basis in a Member State of the European Union adopted a ruling that sentenced to custodial penalties (hereinafter referred to as the ruling of a custodial sentence), the recognition and execution of the Foundation is the European Union, the competent authorities of the Member State of entry into force of the decision of the custodial sentence and specific forms of acknowledgement, as well as the Latvian Court ruling on the decision of the custodial sentence recognition and enforcement. 775. article. Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on enforcement of custodial penalties, the conditions of (1) the Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on a custodial sentence may be executed in Latvia, to any person, irrespective of its legal status in Latvia, Latvia agrees. (2) the consent of Latvia is not required if: (1) a Member State of the European Union) the sentenced person is a Latvian citizen and living in Latvia; 2 a Member State of the European Union) the sentenced person is a citizen of Latvia and the judgment or administrative decision is contained in the order for the expulsion or deportation to Latvia. (3) the Member State of the European Union it sentenced the convicted person in a custodial sentence can be carried out only with the consent of the person except when: 1) is a Latvian citizen and living in Latvia; 2 the judgment or administrative decision) has an order of removal or deportation of a person to Latvia; 3) person is away or returned to Latvia in Latvia due to the fact that the Member State of the European Union launched criminal proceedings against that person or accepted a conviction. 776. article. Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on recognition of a custodial sentence and the reasons for any refusal to execute

(1) a ruling on the custodial sentence recognition and enforcement may be refused if: 1) not sent specific forms of acknowledgement or it is incomplete or does not match its ruling the content you added; 2) are not complied with this law, the conditions referred to in article 775; 3) using fine, will be a violation of the inadmissibility of double punishment (ne bis in idem) principle; 4) Member State of the European Union of persons convicted for the same offence could be punished under criminal law; 5) fine execution barred; 6) there is this law, criminal proceedings under Chapter 8 of the immunity; 7) Member State of the European Union the sentenced person has not reached the age at which criminal liability arises; 8) at the time of receipt of the request in a Member State of the European Union, the convicted person in less than six months remaining until the end of the sentence; 9) Latvia, before taking a decision on the ruling on the deprivation of liberty the recognition and enforcement of this law 782. referred to in the third subparagraph the order in the Member State of the European Union has requested the consent of the convicted person in that State prosecution, trial, or punishment execution in Latvia of criminal offences that are committed before that person's surrender and not the offence for which the person will be surrendered, but the agreement of the Member State of the European Union is delivered; 10) included in the fine with psychiatric or health issues, or other measures of a measure that could not be executed in Latvia; 11) is impossible to meet because of penalties in a Member State of the European Union the sentenced person is not in Latvia. (2) ruling on the custodial sentence recognition and enforcement may be refused if it accepted the person's absence (in absentia), except when the person concerned: 1) received a summons or otherwise been informed that a decision can be taken without its presence; 2) was informed of the process and participated in the hearing protector; 3) received the ruling and provided information that this ruling does not challenge the lodge or not. 777. article. The point of view of Latvia before the ruling and to provide specific forms of acknowledgement of receipt of (1) the Ministry of Justice, received by a Member State of the European Union information on the desire to ask for Latvia in the country adopted in agreement with the ruling on the enforcement of custodial penalties in Latvia, check whether the relevant Member State of the European Union, a convicted person has permanent residence in Latvia, family, social or professional, or one of the other links with Latvia, which will promote this personal resocializācij. If necessary, the Ministry of Justice may ask the national police to carry out an inspection. (2) the views of the Ministry of Justice shall send to the Member State of the European Union. (3) in cases other than those mentioned in this law, in the second paragraph of article 77, the Ministry of Justice shall decide whether or not to consent the consent decree and the special form of transfer for Latvia. 778. article. Member State of the European Union ruling and specific forms of inspections by the Ministry of Justice, received the award for custodial sentences and specific forms of acknowledgement, the this law, 754 under the procedures laid down in article and materials sent to the Court, notifying Member States of the European Union. 779. article. Member State of the European Union adopted a ruling on the deprivation of freedom of recognition and enforcement (1) the district (City) Court shall take a decision on the ruling on the deprivation of liberty the recognition and enforcement of this law, the procedure referred to in Article 807 and Latvia the penalty determined by the enforced this law referred to in Article 760.
(2) the Court may defer making a decision on a ruling on the deprivation of freedom of recognition and enforcement, where specific forms of proof is incomplete or inconsistent with the judgment and set a time limit, to which this Declaration to the Member State of the European Union should be clarified. The Court may postpone making a decision on a ruling on the deprivation of liberty the recognition and enforcement of this law 782. also in the case referred to in the article, if it is necessary to ask for the consent of the Member States of the European Union. (3) the Member State of the European Union takeover of the convicted person takes this law 768. article. 780. article. Member State of the European Union of the convicted person's detention, temporary custody and security features of the application in a Member State of the European Union, if the sentenced person is in Latvia, the person detained, apply it temporary custody and security feature of this law, and 772 770.771. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article and term. 781. article. Legal consequences of, a Member State of the European Union imposed a custodial sentence in execution in Latvia of a Member State of the European Union in the custodial sentence imposed to be executed in Latvia in accordance with the law referred to in article 121. 782. article. From a Member State of the European Union take over the person's criminal liability and punishment execution frame (1) European Union Member State convicts a person for a custodial sentence in Latvia cannot be held criminally liable, the Court to execute the punishment of an offence committed before that person's surrender and that no offence for which that person was transferred. (2) referred to in the first subparagraph shall not apply where: 1) person after release 45 days have not left Latvia, although it had the chance, or returned to Latvia after leaving it; 2 for an offence not intended to be) a custodial penalty; 3 criminal proceedings does not apply) measures restricting personal liberty; 4) person could order the penalty or a measure not involving the deprivation of liberty; 5) has received consent to the transfer; 6) after the transfer of the person waived the right to apply the first subparagraph of this article; 7) received in a Member State of the European Union, which imposed a custodial sentence, the prosecution, the costs of the agreement or the enforcement of the penalty. (3) the second paragraph of this article, the consent referred to in section 7 shall be requested in the same order as the issuing Member State of the European Union. 72. chapter. Foreign country ordered the fine performance of the Latvia Article 809. On request of foreign sentenced the fine execution of the evaluation at the request of a foreign principle on ordered the fine to be executed in Latvia, the recognition and enforcement of this Act shall apply to the procedure referred to in section 69 where this chapter provides otherwise. 784. article. In Latvia the executable the fines (1) Latvia executable fine court determines if a foreign country fined and criminal law for the same offence as the principal provides fine or more severe penalty or fine for as additional penalty. (2) a foreign State the amount of the fine imposed by Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect on the date of the judgment a criminal conviction. (3) Latvia executable fine may not exceed the fine provided for in the criminal code's maximum limit for such offences, except where the relevant offence in Latvia for more severe penalties. In this case the executable in Latvia, the fine may not exceed the fine provided for in the criminal law the maximum limit at the time of adoption of the decision. (4) in Latvia in payment of the fine, the Court may postpone the deadlines or broken for a period of not more than one year from the date of entry into force of the decision. Foreign country specific payment deadlines or Division is binding on the courts of Latvia, however, the Court may in addition impose performance incentives, not exceeding the limits set in this paragraph. (5) If the executable in Latvia, the fine is not paid within 30 days, you can replace it with the penalty associated with deprivation of liberty, if it allows the foreign law which has given judgment. In this case, the replacement of the fine takes place in Latvia. (6) the substitution of the fine is not permissible, if foreign, submitting a request for enforcement of a fine, specifically atrunājus. In this case, the Court with the Ministry of Justice informs the foreign country for failing to execute a request for the execution of sentences and asked to withdraw the request. 73. chapter. Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on the nature of the economic recovery execution in 791. Latvia article. Ruling on the nature of the economic recovery, the basis for execution

Basis in a Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on fines (legal persons — recovery of money), in the same ruling the compensation specified in the victim, procedural and reimbursement payment victim support fund or organization (hereinafter referred to as a judgment on the economic recovery of nature) to fulfill are: 1) the European Union, the competent authorities of the Member State of judgment on the economic recovery of nature or a certified copy thereof and of the specific forms of proof; 2) the fact that the person is the subject of the nature of the economic recovery, the place of residence in Latvia (legal entity, registered legal address), or owns property or has other income; 3) Latvian Court ruling for the executable property in Latvia nature recovery; 4) Latvia court injunction on the ruling on the nature of the recovery of the property transfers executed in Latvia. 786. article. Ruling on the nature of the economic recovery of the grounds for refusal of enforcement (1) ruling on the nature of the recovery of the property to the enforcement may be refused if: 1) not sent specific forms of acknowledgement or it is incomplete or does not correspond to the content of the judgment; 2) by following the ruling on the nature of the economic recovery, will be a violation of the inadmissibility of double punishment (ne bis in idem) principle; 3) has reason to believe that a certain person a fine race, religion, ethnicity, sex or political opinion; 4) judgment on the economic recovery of nature refers to the offence committed by Latvian law not criminal; 5) there is this law, criminal proceedings under Chapter 8 of the immunity; 6) fine execution in Latvia; 7) to fulfill the punishment is statute-barred and the judgment on the economic recovery of nature refers to the offence, which is under the jurisdiction of Latvia; 8) Member State of the European Union the sentenced person has not reached the age at which criminal liability arises; 9) judgment on the nature of the recovery of the property taken in the writing process and the Member State of the European Union the sentenced person the same personally or by counsel, via has not been informed of the right to appeal against the ruling of the law of the issuing State in accordance with the procedure laid down in the legislation; 10) the nature of the economic recovery does not exceed 70 euro in lats equivalent (conversion according to the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect on the day of pronouncement of the judgment). (2) ruling on the nature of the economic recovery may be refused even if it passed in a Member State of the European Union in the absence of the convicted person (in absentia) or without this person's participation, except when it: 1) received a summons or otherwise been informed that a decision can be taken without its presence; 2) was informed of the process and participated in the hearing protector; 3) received a ruling on the nature of the economic recovery and provided information that this ruling does not challenge the lodge or not; 4) being informed of the proceedings and an opportunity to participate in the proceedings, has waived the right to be heard and clearly stated that the no contest ruling. (3) If a decision on the nature of the economic recovery for this law, 3. the offences referred to in the annex in relation to the offence is extraditable whether this also with Latvian law does not perform. 787. article. Ruling on the nature of the recovery of the property inspection procedure (1) the Ministry of Justice, received a ruling on the nature of the economic recovery, examine this law in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 754 and materials sent to the Court, notifying Member States of the European Union. (2) the Court, received a ruling on the nature of the economic recovery and the evaluated materials attached to it, whether there are 786. this law, the grounds for refusal referred to in article, and decide on the nature of Latvia executable drive or waiver to meet the ruling. 788. article. In Latvia the executable property of character driven, recognition and enforcement of Judgments (1) property in nature recovery execution in Latvia shall determine the district (City) Court judge at the place of residence of the person or the property's location on the basis of this law, in article 759.760 and 784. in the second and fourth conditions referred to and order. (2) a person described in the order for recovery found actual conditions and personal guilt is binding on the Court of Latvia. (3) If the law of a Member State of the European Union do not allow the ruling on the nature of the recovery of the property defined in the replacement of the fine and the fine willingly defaults, the Court with the Ministry of Justice shall inform the Member States of the European Union and asked to undo the ruling on the nature of the economic recovery. (4) if the European Union Member State specific forms of acknowledgement has indicated that its law allows the award of economic recovery given the nature of the fine, fine substitution happens this Act 645. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article. (5) If a person, in respect of which the Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on the nature of the recovery of the property, proof of ruling on the nature of the economic recovery in the performance of all or part of the Court to the Ministry of Justice or communicate directly with the ruling issued by the Member States of the European Union to get its approval. 789. article. The nature of the economic recovery termination of execution (1) the nature of the Economic recovery execution terminates if the Member State of the European Union cancelled the convictions, ruling on the nature of the economic recovery. (2) the Member State of the European Union, decisions on punishment reduction, amnesty or pardon act extradition is binding for Latvia. (3) From a Member State of the European Union received notice of the first and second part of the intended legal facts of the Ministry of Justice sends the decision to the Court, which previously ruled with recovery run nature economic issues. 74. chapter. Foreign confiscation of property of the appropriate enforcement of the Latvia article 790. The confiscation of property of a foreign country applied the principles of assessing the foreign request for confiscation of property in execution of this law review 69. arrangements referred to in chapter a, if this chapter provides otherwise. 791. article. In Latvia the executable property confiscation (1) confiscation of property to be executed in Latvia, determining if it is a foreign country and sentenced for the same offence as a principal or an additional penalty for criminal law or criminal proceedings in progress in Latvia effects would be forfeited to another basis provided for in law. (2) If a foreign judgment provides for the confiscation of property, but the criminal code does not provide for confiscation of property as a penalty or additional penalty, confiscation shall apply only to the extent that the foreign judgment found that the thing is forfeited of the crime or the criminal tools. (3) a foreign country ordered the confiscation of the property, if the ruling was made on a certain amount of money is calculated by the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect on the date of the judgment a criminal conviction. (4) If you receive multiple decisions on confiscation of property in respect of the amount of money and these rulings are issued for one person may not have sufficient funds to Latvia comply with all rulings, or at the same time receive multiple ruling on the confiscation of property in respect of a specific part of the property, the decision on which of the decisions will carry the Court shall be adopted, taking into account: 1) the gravity of the crime; 2 for the attachment of property); 3) order in which the ruling on confiscation of property received in Latvia. 792. article. Conditions relating to the confiscation of the property obtained money or property sharing with foreign countries

(1) a request for the confiscation of property acquired as a result of money or Division of property shall decide in each case the Ministry of Justice. (2) in considering an application for confiscation of property acquired as a result of the distribution of funds, take into account the amount of funds obtained, with the criminal offence of injury and the location of the victims. (3) If confiscation of property of the resulting cash is not greater than 10 000 euro in lats equivalent (conversion according to the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect a decision on the date of confiscation of property), the Ministry of Justice shall take a decision on the refusal to transfer funds abroad. If the confiscation of property of the resulting cash is greater than 10 000 euro in lats equivalent (conversion according to the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect a decision on the date of confiscation of property), the Ministry of Justice, in consultation with the foreign country, the decision to transfer the foreign country not more than half of the funds or the amount specified in the request. (4) the Ministry of Justice, after consultation with the foreign, may decide on the distribution of funds, which are not mentioned in the third paragraph of this article and which is not prejudicial to the financial interests of Latvia. Consultations take into account the second paragraph of this article. (5) at the request of the Foreign Ministry of Justice may decide on the forfeiture of property assets resulting from the return of the foreign State. (6) the Ministry of Justice refused the request for confiscation of property obtained money or property distribution, if the request is received after one year from the date of notification of the ruling on the confiscation of property. (7) procedures for the confiscation of property obtained as a result of funds or assets shall be distributed to foreign countries and a money transfer as well as cash or property distribution criteria are established by the Cabinet of Ministers. 75. chapter. Member State of the European Union of confiscation of property of the appropriate enforcement of the 793. article. Member State of the European Union ruling on the confiscation of property, the basis for the fulfilment of a Member State of the European Union ruling on the property, and the crime of criminal confiscation (forfeiture of property, judgment on the) execution grounds in Latvia are: 1) ruling on the confiscation of property or a certified copy thereof and of the specific forms of proof; 2) the fact that the person is the subject of a ruling on the confiscation of property, the place of residence in Latvia (legal entity, registered legal address), or owns property or has other income; 3) Latvia court decision on the confiscation of the property of the executed in Latvia and the injunction on the release of this decision. 794. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property of the grounds for refusal of enforcement (1) ruling on the seizure of property enforcement may be refused if: 1) not sent specific forms of acknowledgement or it is incomplete or does not match its ruling the content you added; 2), covered by the ruling, not included in annex 2 of this law and not criminal law of Latvia; 3) will run the ruling violated the double punishment not permissible (ne bis in idem) principle; 4) there is this law, criminal proceedings under Chapter 8 of the immunity; 5 execution of a ruling in Latvia); 6) penalty enforcement is statute-barred and the ruling applies to the offence, which is under the jurisdiction of Latvia; 7) Member State of the European Union the sentenced person has not reached the age at which criminal liability arises; 8) has reason to believe that the penalty laid down a person's gender, race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, language or political opinion; 9) ruling enforcement would be contrary to the fundamental principles of the legal system of Latvia. (2) ruling on the seizure of property may refuse enforcement if it is taken in the Member States of the European Union, persons convicted in absentia (in absentia), except when the person: 1) received a summons or otherwise been informed that a decision can be taken without its presence; 2) was informed of the process and participated in the hearing protector; 3) received a ruling on the confiscation of property and provided information that this ruling does not challenge the lodge or not. (3) If a decision on seizure of property for this law, 2. the offence referred to in the annex to check on whether the offence is a crime in accordance with Latvian law, also not out. 795. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property of the execute (1) ruling on the confiscation of property, the Court may postpone the execution if: 1) total value that would be obtained as a result of the enforcement of a judgment, may exceed the amount specified in the ruling because the execution at the same time in several Member States of the European Union; 2) it could potentially harm the criminal proceedings in Latvia; 3) Member State of the European Union the sentenced person in Latvia is brought to court, challenging the enforcement order; 4) Latvia started the execution of confiscation of property. (2) a sworn bailiff, found in the first part of these reasons, defer the decision on the confiscation of property and take measures for the enforcement of confiscation. Sworn bailiff about the suspension of enforcement of a decision shall notify the Court and the Justice Ministry. (3) the Ministry of Justice shall inform the Member States on the adoption of the judgment ruling on the confiscation of property of the execution postponed. 796. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property of the inspection procedure, the Ministry of Justice received a ruling on the confiscation of property, the appearance of this law, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 754 and materials sent to the Court, notifying Member States of the European Union. 797. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property of recognition and enforcement (1) ruling on the confiscation of property the recognition and enforcement of established District (City) Court judge at the place of residence of the person (legal person – by the registered legal address) or location of property pursuant to this law, 759 and 760. conditions referred to in article and order. (2) the district (City) Court judge sent the bailiff to the injunction, which indicates that a decision has been taken on the basis of the European Union, the competent authorities of the Member State a request for confiscation of property. District (municipal) Court judge sent the Justice Department a copy of the decision taken and information about the artist, whom the Court decision sent out. (3) If a decision on seizure of property for a certain amount of money, district (City) Court decision shall indicate the amount, in LCY, the total amount of money in accordance with the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect on the day of pronouncement of the judgment. (4) If a person in respect of whom the decision ruling on the confiscation of property, proof of property seizure ruling on full or partial discharge, district (City) Court judge with the Ministry of Justice contact the ruling adopted by the Member States of the European Union to get its approval. If you received a confirmation of the full ruling on the confiscation of property, the execution of district (City) Court judge annulled the decision on the confiscation of the property of the executed in Latvia. If the approval is for a partial ruling on the confiscation of property, the execution of district (City) Court judge amended decision according to received approval. 798. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property of the execute procedure (1) If you receive multiple decisions on confiscation of property taken concerning one person, and the person concerned does not have sufficient resources to Latvia comply with all rulings or more rulings on the confiscation of property in respect of the property, the decision on which ruling or rulings on seizure of property, the Court adopted in implementation, taking into account: 1) the gravity of the crime; 2 for the attachment of property); 3) dates and dates adopted when Latvia received a ruling on the confiscation of property. (2) the Member State of the European Union, decisions on punishment reduction, amnesty or pardon act extradition is binding for Latvia. (3) the decision on the confiscation of property for the termination, if the Member State of the European Union canceled the ruling on confiscation of property. (4) a Member State of the European Union received notice of the second and third subparagraphs the intended legal facts of the Ministry of Justice shall forward to the Court that the decision to perform the duty, and inform the sworn bailiff. 799. article. Lodging a complaint about the ruling on the enforcement of confiscation of property (1) a Person against whom or against whose property faces decision on the confiscation of property of the executed in Latvia, sworn bailiff's activities may appeal to the civil procedure law. (2) a complaint about the ruling on confiscation of property for reasons of the decision be adopted by the Member States of the European Union Court. (3) If you receive a complaint about the ruling on confiscation of property for reasons, following receipt of the information from the Ministry of Justice of the Court shall inform the Member States of the European Union. 800. article. Conditions relating to the confiscation of the property obtained money or property distribution by Member State of the European Union

(1) at the request of the Member States of the European Union, the Ministry of Justice decides the issue of confiscation of property obtained money or property distribution with that Member State. (2) If confiscation of property acquired as a result of funds is not greater than 10 000 euro in lats equivalent (conversion according to the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect a decision on the date of confiscation of property), the Ministry of Justice shall take a decision on the refusal to transfer funds to the Member State of the European Union. If the confiscation of property of the resulting cash is greater than 10 000 euro in lats equivalent (conversion according to the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect a decision on the date of confiscation of property), the Ministry of Justice decides to transfer to the relevant Member State of the European Union, half of the money. (3) the Ministry of Justice, in consultation with the Member States of the European Union, may decide on the distribution of funds, which are not mentioned in the second paragraph of this article and not prejudicial to the financial interests of Latvia. Consultations take into account with the criminal offence of injury and the location of the victims. (4) at the request of the Member States of the European Union, the Ministry of Justice may decide on the forfeiture of property assets resulting from the return of that Member State. (5) the Ministry of Justice refused the request of a Member State of the European Union of confiscation of property obtained money or property distribution, if the request is received after one year from the date of notification of the ruling on the confiscation of property. (6) procedures for the confiscation of property obtained as a result of funds or assets shall be distributed to Member States of the European Union and any funds transferred, as well as cash or property distribution criteria are established by the Cabinet of Ministers. 76. chapter. Foreign country specific penalties and disqualifications in a Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on the execution of alternative sanctions in Latvia 801. article. In Latvia the executable definition of disqualification (1) a foreign request for court in a foreign country are sentenced to the recognition and enforcement of penalties, as well as the determination of the fine look of this law and article 759.760 in that order. (2) all foreign executable in Latvia imposed disqualification or deprivation, which correspond to those laid down in the criminal code for this additional penalty imposition criteria. (3) the determination of disqualification for a period of one year to five years, if the foreign judgment in less time. (4) the Court shall determine the executable in Latvia the penalty may not be applied if the disqualification does not see its usefulness in your own country. (5) Latvia can determine the rights which by their content relates to the execution of all the countries, even if the punishment is executed in a foreign country at the same time. 802. article. Ruling on the alternative basis for the execution of penalties (1) any Member State of the European Union Court ruling out, in which a specified penalty not related with deprivation of liberty, not with the economic recovery of nature or the confiscation of property, or the courts or competent authorities to comply with the ruling, which applied a probation measure (hereinafter decision on alternative sanctions), are: 1) the European Union, the competent authorities of the Member State of the ruling issued on alternative sanctions or a certified copy thereof and of the specific forms of proof; 2) the fact that a person covered by the alternative sanction, has permanent residence in Latvia and this person is in Latvia; 3) Latvia court decision on alternative penalties to run in Latvia. (2) Latvia recognised and enforced on alternative penalties when a person covered by the alternative sanction, Latvia residents, but has indicated that residence in Latvia it will be achievable if: 1 there is a person in Latvia) labour relations; in Latvia there are 2 person) family relationships; 3) person in Latvia in education. (3) probation measures is an obligation imposed on a person in connection with conditional sentencing, conditional suspension of determination of the fine or a conditional early release from punishment. (4) the action is conditional suspension is the judgment of the Court of Justice, to which the fine is conditionally deferred by applying one or more probation measures or custodial sentence are assigned to one or more probation measures. 803. article. Ruling on the execution of alternative sanctions for refusal (1) ruling on the alternative sanctions enforcement may be refused if: 1) not sent specific forms of acknowledgement or it is incomplete or does not correspond to the content of the judgment; 2), subject to the ruling of the alternative sanctions, not included in annex 2 of this law and not criminal law of Latvia; 3) person has no permanent place of residence in Latvia or that person in Latvia is not reachable; 4) by following the ruling on the alternative sanctions, would violate the double punishment not permissible (ne bis in idem) principle; 5) judgment on alternative sanctions relate to the offence committed by the Latvian law not criminal; 6) there is this law, criminal proceedings under Chapter 8 of the immunity; 7) ruling out is barred and ruling on the alternative sanctions relate to the offence, which is under the jurisdiction of Latvia; 8) has reached the age of the person with whom there was criminal liability; 9) the alternative sanction not exceeding six months; 10 ruling on alternative sanctions) for medical treatment, which is not possible in Latvia's execution. (2) ruling on the enforcement of alternative sanctions is denied if it accepted the person's absence (in absentia), except when the person: 1) received a summons or otherwise been informed that a decision can be taken without its presence; 2) was informed of the process and participated in the hearing protector; 3) received the award for alternative sanctions and informed that this ruling does not challenge the lodge or not. (3) where a judgment on an alternative sanction for this Act of the offence referred to in annex 2, in relation to the offence is extraditable whether this also with Latvian law does not perform. 804. article. Ruling on the alternative sanctions inspection procedure (1) the Ministry of Justice, received the award for alternative sanctions, examine this law in Article 754 duly and promptly with the materials sent to the Court, notifying Member States of the European Union. (2) If not sent specific forms of acknowledgement or it is incomplete or does not correspond to the contents of the ruling, the Ministry of Justice may defer ruling on the alternative sanction, the Court sent informing the Member States of the European Union concerned. 805. article. In Latvia the executable alternative determination (1) District (City) Court shall take a decision on the ruling on the alternative sanction, recognition and enforcement pursuant to this law, 759 and 760. conditions referred to in article and order.
(2) Ruling on the alternative sanctions found actual conditions and personal guilt is binding on the Court of Latvia. (3) the Member State of the European Union apply the alternative penalties, which corresponds to that provided for in the criminal code determines the alternative sanctions, without amending the fine or probation measure and measure. (4) if the Member State of the European Union applied to alternative penalties does not comply with criminal law sanctions set out in the alternative, the Court determined, by amending the appropriate punishment or probation measure, which for the same criminal offence under the criminal code, subject to the following conditions: 1) for possible alternative sanctions must comply with the ruling of the alternative sanctions; 2) alternative sanctions and restrictions may not exceed the maximum laid down in the criminal code fine or probation measure for the same offence, and may not be more severe or more severe on ruling out the alternative sanctions; 3 criminal law penalty laid down in) minimum limit is irrelevant. (5) the Court of Justice to the Ministry of Justice shall inform the Member States of the European Union in the fourth paragraph of this article of the decision taken. 806. article. Decision on alternative penalties of execution

(1) the decision of a Member State of the European Union on the alternative sanction or fine reduction, amnesty or pardon act extradition is binding for Latvia. (2) alternative sanctions enforcement may be terminated if: 1) the person no longer has permanent place of residence in Latvia or that person in Latvia is not reachable; 2) person avoid the alternative sanctions enforcement and there is reason to believe that it is no longer located in Latvia; 3) Member State of the European Union launched a new criminal proceedings against the person and asked to return the alternative sanctions. (3) of this article, in the cases referred to in the second subparagraph, the Court shall take a decision on the alternative sanctions and the termination of the enforcement decision shall send a copy to the authority that an adequate alternative sanctions. The Court of Justice Ministry decision on the alternative sanctions are executed in conjunction with the termination of the materials sent to the relevant Member State of the European Union. (4) the Ministry of Justice, received from the Court's decision on the alternative sanctions enforcement, shall notify the Member State of the European Union, sending the decision and the material. 807. article. In Latvia, the action is executed for an alternative decision sanctions in case of non-compliance (1) If a person avoids run-custodial penalty or linked without justification does not comply with certain court probation measures, the Court shall, on the basis of the application of the authority tasked to monitor the implementation of the alternative sanction, shall take a decision on the award for alternative sanctions enforcement or penalties applied. (2) alternative sanctions enforcement monitoring matters during the appearance in Chapter 61 of this law. (3) in the first subparagraph of this article, in the cases specified in the Court decision on penalty execution shall not be admissible if the ruling on the alternative sanctions related to the determination of penalty conditionally or ruling on the alternative sanctions are not intended to be a custodial sentence that alternative penalties should be applied in the event of failure. The Court materials are sent to the Ministry of Justice to transfer to the relevant Member State of the European Union following the making of the decision. (4) the Ministry of Justice, the Court received from the third paragraph of this article mentioned in the materials, shall notify the Member State of the European Union, and these materials. " 55. Express the seventeenth section as follows: "the seventeenth section. In Latvia the penalty awarded against the enforcement of a foreign country 77. chapter. The General rules concerning Latvia ordered the execution of penalties, article ārvalstī808. Request for execution of the fine conditions for the submission of application (1) the foreign State for the execution of the punishment imposed in Latvia is possible if the Court ruling has entered into force and fine execution abroad promote the resocializācij of the convicted person. (2) a foreign State may be requested Latvia to meet Latvia in a sentence, if, in addition to the first paragraph of this article the terms there are one or more of the following conditions: 1) is convicted in the foreign State, or to citizenship in a foreign country has his habitual residence; 2) is located in a foreign country convicted property or income; 3) is convicted in the foreign state citizenship, and it has expressed its readiness to promote personal resocializācij; 4) Latvia would not be able to execute the punishment, even asking for extradition. (3) before the request, the Ministry of Justice may ask foreign views on whether the offence for which the sentence, is also a crime under the foreign law. 809. article. Request for enforcement of a fine ship for the procedure (1) where there is this law the conditions referred to in Article 808, court judgment or decision is controlled completely by turning the Ministry of Justice with a written proposal to ask the State to execute the foreign sentence. (2) the proposal shall indicate this Law 678. the information referred to in article and then add: 1) the show in force, a copy of the court order; 2) certify the order for enforcement of the judgment or a certified copy of a copy of the injunction; 3 the text of article of the law), after which the person convicted; 4) Statute text governing the limitation period. (3) the Ministry of Justice shall examine the proposal within 10 days and the results will inform the Court that has applied unsuccessfully to them with a proposal. If there is reason to ask Latvia under penalties for enforcement of a foreign country, the Ministry of Justice prepares a request, provide a translation of the request and sends it to a foreign State. (4) at the request of the Foreign Ministry of Justice shall forward to it a criminal or certified documents in criminal cases. (5) If a punishment for a certain number of offences or after several judgments, but not all offences under penalties permitted the execution of a foreign country, the Ministry of Justice proposes that the Court should determine the punishment to be served for the offence for which the punishment enforcement abroad is possible. The Court determined the fine thirteenth section of this Act. 810. article. Complaints about parties in Latvia's absence (in absentia) ordered the execution of punishment in a foreign country (1) If convicted of this Act within the time limit laid down in article 465 has appealed the ruling, the Court issued the invitation to the Court not later than 21 days before the date of the inquiry. (2) the Court of Justice to the Ministry of Justice informs the foreign country, if the complaint is found to be unacceptable, or the person fails to appear at the hearing. (3) if the complaint is accepted for review, the Court with the Ministry of Justice referred the request for penalties sentenced in Latvia. 811. article. Request for execution of penalty filing (1) after the State filed a request for a foreign penal enforcement, Latvia authorities did not do anything with the fine running related activities. (2) in the first subparagraph of this article, the restrictions do not apply to the case where the person before being served a custodial sentence in Latvia or the appropriate security feature — custody. (3) seizure of property, or as an additional penalty of specific disqualification in Latvia can be executed regardless of the request for submission of foreign enforcement penalties. 812. article. The information provided by the Ministry of Justice (1) If a request for enforcement of a foreign country as punishment and the consent of the foreign State, the Ministry of Justice shall inform the applicant and the Court, which controls the complete execution of the judgment, sentenced, as well as his representative in cases where the agent submits a request. (2) upon receipt of information about the foreign sentence to the end of the Ministry of Justice shall notify the Court and the penalty enforcement authority. 81. article. Latvian law enforcement during the fine foreign country (1) Court ruling which established punishment by execution of a foreign country, you can review only by the Court. (2) if the court order is revoked, the Ministry of Justice shall immediately inform foreign. This information supersedes earlier submitted the request for a penalty. (3) If the revision of the judicial decision amended by part of the penalty, or the conditions of implementation, the Ministry of Justice submitted a request for the addition of soda. (4) the amnesty laws adopted in Latvia also apply to persons who have been sentenced to punishment in Latvia, but is executed in a foreign country, so the Ministry of Justice shall immediately send to the foreign countries that submitted applications for the enforcement of penalties, but from which the information has been received about its execution. (5) sentenced to a punishment which is executed in a foreign country, can pardon the law in Latvia. About the pardon of the adoption by the Ministry of Justice shall immediately inform foreign. 814. article. Penalty enforcement law (1) Latvia recovery recovers the penalty execution rights when: 1) a request for the execution of the penalty is withdrawn before foreign notified its intention to execute the penalty; 2) foreign announced the rejection of the request; 3) foreign clearly does not exercise its right to complete a fine, although has announced its intention to do so; 4) foreign enforcement penalties result in delay in is no longer possible. (2) If a request for the execution of the fine voided due to abolition of the Court ruling, the criminal proceedings take place in Latvia in the General order. (3) without prejudice to the execution of the fine places all executed in Latvia and abroad, is counted in the part of the fine served (4) enforcement of fines in Latvia is possible if foreign announced completion of the execution of penalties or become known that person for the same offence, suffered penalty eligible, convicted without action, or another went under amnesty spared in a foreign country with which Latvia has an agreement on the mutual recognition of judgments. 815. article. Limitation periods (1) the Ministry of Justice informs the foreign country for criminal law the limitation provided for by the Member and all factors that affect the limitation period. (2) the foreign statutory limitation period is not an obstacle to enforcement of fines in Latvia after the enforcement of the rights. 78. chapter. In Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence enforcement abroad of 816. article. Based in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence for the enforcement of foreign country

(1) the Foundation of Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence for the enforcement of a foreign country are: 1) the Justice Department's request to meet in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence in a foreign country and foreign acceptance; 2) foreign put request in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence to be executed for this foreign and Justice Ministry approval. (2) the Ministry of Justice carried out the actions provided for in this chapter, if you have received a proposal from the Court, convicted, or their representative, the foreign information or request or on their own initiative. (3) the provisions of this chapter shall apply regardless of whether the convicted person in Latvia is located in a foreign State or in Latvia. 817. article. Conditions relating to the request in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence for enforcement of foreign country sent to the foreign State (1) in addition to this law 808. the conditions referred to in article on Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence for enforcement of foreign country transmission is possible if this request or suggestion at the time of receipt of the remaining convicted at least six months until the end of the sentence. In exceptional cases the request can be submitted, if the sentence is less. (2) the Ministry of Justice may request a foreign State to take over in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence the person to fulfill its mental disorders or mental retardation is defined in specialized treatment in a psychiatric hospital with security or treatment the appropriate custodial sites, equivalent treatment measures. 818. article. The consent of the sentenced imprisonment penalties for complete a foreign country (1) If a convict serving a custodial sentence in a foreign country may request that the custodial sentence, with the consent of the convict. (2) if convicted of a foreign representative or request for a custodial sentence enforcement referrals this foreign State and this in writing at the request of the sentenced is not attached to the election through a fine abroad, the Ministry of justice within 10 days of the present with the convicted this request, explain to him the legal consequences of the transfer and calls to express their attitude to the received request. Consent or refusal expressed in writing, and the convict is evidenced by his signature. (3) If a foreign made the request, the Ministry of Justice allows the foreign representative, for which both countries have agreed to examine the conditions under which the convict gave his consent. (4) If a convict serving a custodial sentence in Latvia, Latvia and foreign countries may agree on the transfer of the convicted without his consent, if there is reason to believe that, taking into account the person's age or physical or mental condition, the transfer is necessary for the sentence and if it agrees with the sentenced. (5) by a custodial sentence of convicted consent is not required when he absconded from parole to his country of nationality. (6) a custodial sentence convicted in Latvia, consent is not required when the judgment as a removal of either Latvia or is this another convicted the binding decision, which led to him not being allowed to stay in Latvia after parole. The request shall be accompanied by the judgment or the decision on expulsion of the copy of the sentenced and his views on the transfer. 819. article. (1) inform the sentenced prison administration 10 days after it received the order for the execution of the judgment, shall inform the foreign citizen convicted in Latvia or a person whose permanent residence is in Latvia, about the person's right to express their wishes through the fine citizenship or country of residence. Sentenced to explain what legal consequences are surrender penal. (2) your request for convicted in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence for enforcement of a foreign State shall be submitted in writing to the Ministry of Justice, which shall immediately be informed in writing of this convict on a foreign State and the dispatch of the notice for the hearing of the request results. (3) the notice shall state: 1 the foreign State) convicted in first name, last name, date and place of birth; 2) sentenced address in a foreign country, if the address is; 3) an offence for which the sentence; 4) type and the amount of the fine, as well as the time when initiated penal. 820. article. Request for execution of a custodial sentence in a foreign country (1) if the person convicted in Latvia with a custodial sentence and is located in a foreign country, the request shall be prepared and transmitted in accordance with this law, the procedure laid down in Article 809. (2) if the person being served a custodial sentence in Latvia and is received by this person or a foreign request for enforcement of custodial penalties in the foreign country, the Ministry of justice within 10 days or after the requested additional information check that there is this law 817 and 818. the conditions referred to in article. If the file does not contain sufficient information, the Ministry of Justice in addition to the foreign State may be requested: 1) document or statement that the convict is a citizen of this State or this country has his habitual residence; 2 the text of the law), under which the offence for which the person is convicted, is considered criminal in the country; 3) information on the procedure for the determination of the fine, the continuation or change of the foreign examples. (3) the Ministry of Justice in the second case referred to the inspection of the request accepts one of the following decisions: 1) submit a request for enforcement of a custodial penalty of a foreign country; 2) accept a custodial penalty enforcement to a foreign country; 3) to reject the request for enforcement of a custodial penalty of a foreign country. (4) at the same time with this law, the notification referred to in article 819 of the Ministry of Justice may send a request to the foreign take over custodial sentence to be executed in a foreign country, if the original material is not found facts that prevent it. In this case, the request shall indicate that it is in effect, provided that the following facts are not found in the relevant foreign country. (5) the Ministry of Justice in addition to this law, Article 809. the documents mentioned in the request shall be accompanied by: 1) for information on already served the finance term, the term of pre-trial detention, reduction of the fine, or any other circumstance that is important in the sentence; 2) sentenced to parole consent to a foreign country; 3) medical or social data on the convicted person, information on treatment in Latvia and, if necessary, recommendations for further treatment of the foreign country. 821. article. The transfer of the sentenced and the legal consequences thereof (1) If Latvia has agreed to a custodial penalty enforcement to a foreign country or foreign has agreed to its completion, the Ministry of Justice asked the State police to coordinate with foreign transfer of this person and put it in the foreign State concerned. (2) subject to this Act, article 81 thus sentenced movement of the Republic of Latvia State border enforcement fines in Latvia is stopped. Enforcement of penalties will not be renewed, if the foreign State has announced that the sentence was completed. (3) in addition to this law, 814. the conditions referred to in article implementation of the renewing of the fine, if the foreign State that: 1) a person has escaped from the penitentiary authorities; 2) penalty execution is completed and the person returned to Latvia. 822. article. The arrest of convicted in Latvia (1) If the sentenced person has escaped from a penal in Latvia and there is a reasonable suspicion that a foreign country could avoid a custodial sentence, the Court in accordance with this law, in Article 808 may propose to ask the Ministry of Justice to the foreign person is arrested until Latvia under penalties enforcement request submission and consideration. (2) if the person is arrested abroad to the first part of this article the request specified in the execution of the penalty, a request must be submitted as soon as possible, but no later than the 15th day after the person's arrest. (3) the person arrested in Latvia, a candidate for the foreign State participation in the process of determining the fine to be executed. If the foreign court finds that in sentenced in Latvia the penalty execution in this country is not possible, Latvia takes over arrested persons and general order shall decide on its holding in custody or release. (4) if the foreign law permits, the arrested person in Latvia the penalty may participate in the process through technical means. (5) if the judgment is cancelled in Latvia, which executes foreign custodial sentences, and the matter is referred to the Court for a new hearing, with the Ministry of Justice shall immediately inform the appropriate foreign and can submit a request for temporary custody application in the cases provided for in this section. 79. chapter. In Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence enforcement in a Member State of the European Union article 823. Conditions relating to the request in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence to be executed in a Member State of the European Union to dispatch to the Member State of the European Union

(1) the request for submission to the Member State of the European Union on Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence enforcement in the Member State of the European Union is possible if there is this law 808. conditions of the first paragraph and then agree to convict and a Member State of the European Union. (2) Convicted consent is not required when: 1) the person is a Member State of the European Union citizen and lives in the Member State of the European Union; 2 as additional penalty laid down in the judgment) the expulsion from Latvia or have another person bound by the decision of which that person is not allowed to stay in Latvia after parole; 3) the convict fled or returned to the Member State of the European Union because of the fact that Latvia launched criminal proceedings against him or accepted a conviction. (3) the agreement of the Member State of the European Union is not required if: 1) convict is a Member State of the European Union citizen and lives in the Member State of the European Union; 2) convict is a citizen of a Member State of the Union as laid down in the additional penalty and expulsion from Latvia or have another person bound by the decision of which that person is not allowed to stay in Latvia after parole. 824. article. Sentenced views (1) If a convict serving a custodial sentence in Latvia and have received a request to complete the sentence in a Member State of the European Union, but this request was not added in writing expressed convicted elections endure the punishment in the relevant Member State of the European Union, the Ministry of Justice of the Act referred to in article 81 procedure and term introduces sentenced to this request, explaining to him the legal consequences of the transfer. Consent or refusal expressed in writing, and the convict is evidenced by his signature. (2) the first paragraph of this article the views provide convicted agent, taking into account the age of the convicted or the physical or mental state. 825. article. The procedure is checked in Latvia are sentenced to the penalty of execution request and sent to the Member State of the European Union (1) the Ministry of Justice initiated in relation to the possibility to ask the Member States of the European Union, to its implementation in Latvia are sentenced to a custodial sentence if convicted, the Court or his representative, the request of a Member State of the European Union information, as well as custodial institutions. (2) where the present law the conditions referred to in article 82, the Court, which controls the judgment or decision in full by turning the Ministry of Justice with a written proposal to ask the Member States of the European Union, so that it executes fine. The suggestion indicates 678. this law and the information referred to in Article 808. The Ministry of Justice consider the suggestion of this law, in Article 809. If there are conditions to ask for a sentence of execution in Latvia of a Member State of the European Union, the Ministry of Justice shall fill out specific forms. (3) If you have received a custodial institution or a Member State of the European Union information, convicted or his representative and the request of the Ministry of Justice believes that there is this law the conditions referred to in article 82, it prepares a special form of this law 809. referred to in the third subparagraph, in the order and within a time limit. (4) If the Ministry of Justice believes that the information provided is not sufficient, it shall request additional information or documents and their submission. This law, in Article 809. deciding the number of requested time from the date of receipt of the materials. (5) the Ministry of Justice gives judgment and a special form of the translation of the relevant Member State of the European Union in the national language or in a language that judgment and to receive this acknowledgement to the Member State designated by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union. (6) specific forms of acknowledgement sent to the Member State of the European Union, together with the verdict and sentenced. On the dispatch of the acknowledgement of the judgment and a European Union Member State shall notify the Ministry of Justice proposal or the applicant. If the person being served a custodial sentence in Latvia, it issued a special document form for information on convicted judgment and send the acknowledgement to the Member State of the European Union. If the person is a Member State of the European Union, the declaration adds specific forms of document for information on the judgment of the sentenced and the dispatch of the acknowledgement to the Member State of the European Union. (7) after it received information from a Member State of the European Union for its decision in relation to this country and sent a special form for the certificate of the Ministry of Justice shall notify the applicant, the court controls the complete execution of the judgment, convicted, as well as his representative in cases where the request is submitted by the representative. 826. article. Request the information you need to decide the question of judgment and specific forms of acknowledgement to be sent (1) if the Minister of Justice finds that a Member State of the European Union will be sentenced, prior to resocializācij, and the special shape of the dispatch of the acknowledgement may require that this Member State of the European Union provides views on whether the penalty enforcement will encourage sentenced resocializācij in the country, as well as the additional information required. Member States of the European Union opinion does not suspend the dispatch of the acknowledgement to the Member State. (2) in cases other than those referred to in article 82 of this law in the third paragraph, the Ministry of justice requires the Member State of the European Union, to inform it of the decision to agree or disagree with the judgment and specific forms of acknowledgement is sent. 827. article. A special form of recall while the penalty enforcement in a Member State of the European Union, has been initiated by the Ministry of Justice, giving reasons, you can undo specific forms. 828. article. The arrest was sentenced in a Member State of the European Union, the Ministry of justice the law 822. in the cases referred to in article and may ask the Member States of the European Union to arrest convicted. 829. article. The transfer of the sentenced (1) If a Member State of the European Union has agreed to the completion, the Ministry of Justice asked the national police, in agreement with the Member of the European Union, no later than 30 days after the Member State has taken the final decision on the recognition and enforcement of a penalty, put the person in it. (2) If there are unforeseen circumstances that hinder or prevent the transfer of the person, the State police shall contact the Member State of the European Union. The transfer of the sentenced happens when there is no longer unexpected circumstances, but no later than 10 days from the date of the new agreement was reached. 830. article. Latvian law enforcement during the fine European Union Member State Latvia of rights penalty execution time in a Member State of the European Union lays down this law article 81. 831. article. Convicted of putting up with the legal consequences of the sentenced movement within the Republic of Latvia for the penal law are suspended. The enforcement of penalties may not be restored if a Member State of the European Union has announced that the sentence was completed. Implementation of the renewing of the fine if the foreign State that a person has escaped from the penitentiary authorities. 80. chapter. In Latvia, the confiscation of property of the appropriate enforcement of foreign country 832. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property of a foreign State to fulfill the dispatch (1) subject to this Act, Chapter 76. these conditions and procedures, the Ministry of Justice may request that Latvia is executed in a suitable property confiscation, which is defined as either principal or whether the property is forfeited on another basis provided for in law (hereinafter referred to as the ruling on confiscation of property). (2) Latvia accepted the ruling on confiscation of property can be sent simultaneously to several foreign countries, where the property is located in various foreign countries or the seizure is related to activities in several foreign countries. Sending more rulings on the confiscation of property, the Ministry of Justice informed all foreign countries that are involved in the execution of a ruling. 833. article. Execution of confiscation of property (1) received information from a foreign country on the confiscation of the property of a ruling by the Ministry of Justice may request that the decision on the foreign confiscation of property obtained money or property distribution. (2) in the light of the result of injury, number of victims, and the costs of criminal proceedings in Latvia, the Ministry of Justice may apply to the seizure of property obtained as a result of the money be returned partially or in full. (3) the received information from foreign property that was confiscated as a historical, artistic or scientific value or realization was not desirable, the Ministry of Justice agreed with that on such things a foreign takeover.
81. Latvia adopted a ruling on the nature of the economic recovery, ruling on the confiscation of property and the ruling on the enforcement of alternative sanctions in the Member State of the European Union article 834. Ruling on the nature of the economic recovery, sending out to the Member State of the European Union

(1) If it is not possible to perform in Latvia adopted a decision on the nature of the economic recovery, as the convicted resident (legal person – the registered legal address), then the property or income belonging to another Member State of the European Union, the Court or the Prosecutor, ruling on the nature of the economic recovery along with specific forms of acknowledgement sent to the Ministry of Justice. (2) the Ministry of Justice provides special forms, prepare a translation of a proof of information about criminal law the limitation period set out in the flow and sends these documents to the relevant Member State of the European Union. (3) the Ministry of justice all material at the same time send to only one Member State of the European Union. 835. article. Ruling on the nature of the economic recovery in the shipping out the consequences after Latvia adopted a ruling on the nature of the economic recovery sent out to the Member State of the European Union and the Member State concerned adopted a decision on its acceptance of the completion, the Latvian authorities do not do anything with the nature of the economic recovery implementation activities. 836. article. Ruling on the nature of the economic recovery the recovery of Latvia law enforcement recovered the ruling on the nature of the economic recovery execution rights when: 1) it relies on the judgment of the recovery of the nature of the financial implementation of the European Union Member State; 2) the Member State shall inform about the complete or partial ruling on the economic recovery of nature does not. 837. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property, sending out to the Member State of the European Union (1) If it is not possible to perform in Latvia adopted a decision on confiscation of property because the convicted resident (legal person – the registered legal address), then the property or income belonging to another Member State of the European Union, the Court ruling on the confiscation of property, along with specific forms of acknowledgement sent to the Ministry of Justice. (2) the Ministry of Justice provides special form a translation of a proof of the relevant Member State of the European Union in the national language or languages, which the receiving proof that Member State designated by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, as well as prepare the information on the criminal law of the limitation period laid down and forward these documents to the relevant Member State of the European Union. (3) Latvia accepted the ruling on confiscation of property can be sent simultaneously to several Member States of the European Union, where the property is located in different Member States or the seizure is related to activities in several Member States. (4) if the property covered by the confiscation of property of the ruling, it is historical, artistic or scientific value or realization is not desirable, in particular in the form of a proof of claim in question. 838. article. Ruling on the confiscation of property of the consequences of sending Latvia accepted the ruling on confiscation of property transmission at the same time more European Union Member States without prejudice to the enforcement of this ruling in Latvia. 839. article. Latvia adopted a ruling on the confiscation of property in execution of the termination (1) If the court annuls the decision adopted in Latvia for the confiscation of property, it shall inform the Ministry of Justice, which shall immediately inform the Member States of the European Union on Latvia accepted the Court ruling on the confiscation of property. (2) the Ministry of Justice shall immediately inform the Member States of the European Union on Latvia accepted amnesty and pardon. 840. article. Request concerning confiscation of property obtained money or property distribution (1) received information from a Member State of the European Union concerning the ruling on confiscation of property, the performance of the Ministry of justice within 30 days of this Member State to decide on confiscation of property acquired as a result of money or possessions. (2) information received from a Member State of the European Union concerning the ruling on confiscation of property, if the property acquired as a result of the confiscation of funds is greater than 10 000 euro in lats equivalent (conversion according to the Bank of Latvia exchange rate that was in effect on the date of receipt of information), the Ministry of Justice asking that half of the Member States of the funds transferred to the Latvian State budget account. (3) in the light of the result of injury, number of victims, and the costs of criminal proceedings in Latvia, the Ministry of Justice may request that the Member State of the European Union returned more than half of the confiscation of property acquired as a result of funds. (4) the received information from a Member State of the European Union on the property, which was confiscated as a historical, artistic or scientific value or realization was not desirable, the Ministry of Justice agreed with that Member on such things. 841. article. Latvia adopted a ruling on the alternative sanctions enforcement to send a European Union Member State in which the convicted's residence (1) If it is not possible to execute the Court ruling adopted in Latvia on alternative sanctions because the convict has returned or submitted the application that wants to return to permanent residence in another Member State of the European Union, the Court delivered the verdict, ruling in the first instance with the specific forms of acknowledgement sent to the Ministry of Justice. (2) ruling on the question of alternative sanctions, which should be initiated enforcement once served by custodial penalties, sent to the Member State of the European Union of a parole after prison authorities shall examine the application of this Law Article 651. The ruling along with specific forms of acknowledgement to the Court of the Justice Ministry. (3) the question of ruling on the alternative penalties on the transmission of the Member State of the European Union these sanctions enforcement after the application of the authority tasked to monitor the enforcement of alternative sanctions, this law 651. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article. The ruling along with specific forms of acknowledgement to the Court of the Justice Ministry. (4) in the third subparagraph, in the case referred to in the decision adopted in Latvia on alternative sanctions can be sent out to the relevant Member State of the European Union, if not served soda, or a suitable probation measure remaining run time limit not exceeding six months. (5) the Ministry of Justice, the Court received from the first, second or third subparagraph, ruling together with specific forms of receipt provided a translation of a proof, prepare information about Criminal convictions as defined in the judgment enforcement is barred and forward these documents to the relevant Member State of the European Union. The Ministry of justice all material at the same time send to only one Member State of the European Union. 842. article. Latvia adopted a ruling on the alternative sanctions enforcement dispatch to the Member State of the European Union who are not convicted of habitual residence (1) Convicted has the right to submit an application for a ruling adopted in Latvia on alternative sanctions to perform the dispatch to the Member State of the European Union, which is not the person's permanent place of residence, if not served soda, or a suitable probation measure remaining run time limit not less than six months. (2) convicted in the first part of the application, as set up in Latvia adopted a ruling on the commencement of the execution of alternative sanctions shall be submitted to the Court which delivered the judgment at first instance, but during the execution of the judgment, the Court of first instance, which controls the judgment or decision. The application to the Court does not suspend the execution of alternative sanctions in Latvia. (3) the Court of first instance judge, received sentenced a submission, with Ministry of Justice clarified the relevant Member State of the European Union in certain alternative sanctions enforcement criteria. (4) subject to the conditions of part three, the question of alternative sanctions to perform the dispatch to the Member State of the European Union decided in the Court of first instance judge this law 651. in accordance with the procedure laid down in article. The judge, pursuant to this law, 841. in the first and fourth in part, ruling together with specific forms of acknowledgement sent to the Ministry of Justice. (5) the Ministry of Justice, received from the Court ruling along with specific forms of receipt provided a translation of a proof, prepare information about Criminal convictions as defined in the judgment enforcement is barred and forward these documents to the relevant Member State of the European Union article 841 of this law. 843. article. Latvia adopted a ruling on the alternative of sending out the sanctions effects after Latvia accepted the ruling on the enforcement of alternative sanctions in the dispatch to the Member State of the European Union and the Member State of the adoption of the decision of the Latvian authorities to fulfill out with alternative sanctions enforcement and monitoring related activities. 844. article. Latvia adopted a ruling on the alternative sanctions enforcement law recovery

(1) Latvia recover the ruling on the alternative penalty execution rights when: 1) it referred the decision and the specific forms of acknowledgement of receipt of the alternative sanctions for enforcement in the Member States of the European Union; 2) where a Member State of the European Union has transferred back to alternative sanctions Latvia running further to the adoption of the decision; 3) where a Member State of the European Union has transferred back to alternative sanctions Latvia running because the convicted no longer has permanent place of residence in the Member State of the European Union; 4) where a Member State of the European Union has transferred back to alternative sanctions enforcement Latvia because convicted avoid the alternative sanctions enforcement and not on this Member State of the European Union. (2) If in Latvia against convicted criminal proceedings are launched new after the ruling on the enforcement of alternative sanctions, sent to the Member State of the European Union, the Court sent the ruling, may ask the Member State of the European Union to put back the alternative sanctions monitoring. " 56. Considering past 73, 74, 75 and 76. chapter on 82, 83, 84 and 85. chapter. 57. Considering the previous 811, 812, 813., 814, 815, 816, 817..., 818, 819, 820,..., 821, 822, 823..., 824, 825, 825.1 825.2 825.3 825.4 article,, and respectively for 845, 846, 847., 848, 849, 850, 851..., 852, 853, 854..., 855, 856, 857, 858.., 859, 860, 861., 862 and 863. article. 58. To replace the second paragraph of article 825.5 "73." with the number "82." and the number "71." — with numbers and the word "74. or 75.". 59. Considering past and accordingly article 825.5 825.6 864 and 865. for article. 60. To supplement the law with 866 867, 868, 869, 870, 871, 872,..., 873, 874. Article 875 and the following wording: "866. article. The decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a fulfillment basis the decision of a Member State of the European Union, which is determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a fulfillment basis are: 1) the Member States of the European Union, the decision of the competent authority, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a copy or a certified and specific forms of proof; 2) General Prosecutor's Office decision to recognise and execute in Latvia is a Member State of the European Union decision that determines a security related features. Article 867. The decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of conditions (1) notice of the decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of enforcement, if the person is a permanent resident in Latvia and this person has agreed to return to Latvia and if specific forms of acknowledgement contains any of the following prohibitions and obligations: 1) the obligation to inform the competent authority of Latvia change of residence; 2 prohibition to visit certain) area, place or area in the Member State of the European Union, which adopted the decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of or in Latvia; 3) the obligation to stay at a specific time in a specific location; 4) the prohibition to leave Latvia; 5) the obligation specified in the time to log on to the specified authority; 6) prohibition of contact with certain persons in connection with alleged offences; 7) ban on specific actions related to the alleged offence and which can apply to work in a particular profession or field of employment; 8) the prohibition to drive. (2) a decision which determines the deprivation of liberty not linked security features, you can run the application even if the person does not live permanently in Latvia, but has made the request to the appropriate it-custodial safety feature to run in Latvia and, if one of the following conditions: 1) to the person in Latvia there is a working relationship; in Latvia there are 2 person) family relationships;
3) person in Latvia in education. 868. article. Down with the decision-custodial security measure, the reasons for any refusal to execute a decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of enforcement may be refused if: 1) specific forms of proof is incomplete or does not comply with the decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a fixed period, and this is not specified; 2), subject to the decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of this law is contained in annex 2 and not a criminal by Latvian law, except where this decision applies to the avoidance of the payment of taxes and levies or customs and currency regulations, the laws of Latvia is not designed or intended, but the framework laid down in the laws of Latvia different from a decision adopted in a Member State of the European Union laid down in the framework legislation; 3) specific forms of acknowledgement contains the prohibition or the obligation, which is not included in this law, the first subparagraph of article 867; 4) of this Act do not exist in the article 867-custodial means of enforcement of safety conditions; implementation of decision 5), which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a punishment to be a violation of the inadmissibility of double (ne bis in idem) principle; 6) there is this law, criminal proceedings under Chapter 8 of the immunity; 7) is the criminal liability limitation and decision that determines a security feature unrelated to the application of the offence, which is under the jurisdiction of Latvia; 8) has reached the age of the person with whom there was criminal liability; 9) security features for breach of Latvia in accordance with the rules laid down in chapter 66 would not be issued to a person to the Member State of the European Union. 869. article. The decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a suspension of recognition (1) If specific forms of proof is incomplete or does not correspond with the decision-custodial security measure, the content, the Prosecutor may defer its recognition by informing the Member State of the European Union on the need to clarify it in a given period. (2) where the present law 868 first paragraph of article 1, 3, 4, or 5. grounds for refusal set out in paragraph 1, the Prosecutor may defer the decision of a Member State of the European Union's recognition, informing the Member States of the European Union on the need for a specific time to provide additional information. 870. article. Down with the decision-custodial security measure, recognition and security measure (1), the General Prosecutor's Office received the decision establishing the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of a special form and receipt, within 20 working days, examine these documents and take one of the following decisions: 1) for agreeing to recognise and execute the decision establishing the deprivation of liberty is not related to the application of the security features; 2) refusal to recognise and execute the decision establishing a security-related features of the application. (2) if the person is a Member State of the European Union, the lodge which fixes a security related features, then the first paragraph of this article, the decision should be taken within 40 working days from the day of receipt of the decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a special form and receipt. (3) where there is this law, as laid down in article 869 of the postponement, the Prosecutor referred to in the first subparagraph shall be decided within 20 working days from the date of receipt of the additional information from the Member State of the European Union or of the General deadline for providing information or clarification. (4) If a prosecutor can not follow the first and second part of the deadline, it shall inform the Member States of the European Union, giving the reasons for the delay and the time that is required to make a decision about a Member State of the European Union, which is determined by the decision-custodial security measure, the recognition and enforcement in Latvia. (5) when the first part of this article, paragraph 1 of the decision, set out in the General Prosecutor's Office of Latvia determines the executable with the-custodial safety feature and the security features provided for under the specific prohibition or obligation. (6) in Latvia with the associated custodial security measure must not impair the position of the person to which the Member State of the European Union applied to the deprivation of liberty an unrelated security feature and should comply with the relevant European Union Member State by deprivation of liberty applied unrelated security feature.
(7) the decision of the General Prosecutor's Office is not appealable. 871. article. The decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of enforcement

(1) the decision on consent to recognise and execute the decision establishing the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of the General Prosecutor's Office shall forward to the Member State of the European Union, while asking about the specific date to advise them when the person must enroll in the Latvian State police. Following receipt of the decision of the General Prosecutor's Office and the relevant Member State of the European Union information to police authority when the person's place of residence. (2) the safety features to be executed in Latvia started with the moment when the person was logged on the police of their place of residence. (3) the decision laying down the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of a specified security feature this law but not covered by this law, persons laid down in article 389 of the disqualification period. (4) decision that defines the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of enforcement is without prejudice to the right of the persons concerned, be held criminally liable, the trial or execute it the punishment of an offence committed in the territory of Latvia. 872. article. Complaints about the decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty not linked the imposition of a complaint about a decision that defines the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of the reasons for the adoption of this decision will be only accepted in the European Union Member State competent authority. 873. article. The decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a termination of execution (1) the decision that the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of a performance shall be terminated if: 1) to the person in Latvia is not a permanent resident; 2) Member State of the European Union cancelled the decision establishing the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of a special form and receipt; 3) of a Member State of the European Union adopted a decision on the amendment of the security features and Latvia refused to meet the amended safety feature of this law in accordance with paragraph 3 of article 868; 4) over specific forms of acknowledgement contains the maximum period of application of the security features; 5) Latvia has adopted the decision to end the decision that the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of enforcement because the Prosecutor General's Office has repeatedly informed the Member States of the European Union on security violations or provided information that could be the reason for the amendment of the security features, but the Member States of the European Union within the time limit fixed by the General Prosecutor's Office has taken such a decision. (2) at the request of a Member State of the European Union's General Prosecutor's Office shall take a decision to extend the deadline for the enforcement of the security features. (3) If a Member State of the European Union has adopted the decision to amend the security feature and the application of the security measures associated with the deprivation of liberty, in Latvia, determining the termination decision with unbound, the imposition of a. The person issuing Member State of the European Union are carried out in accordance with this law, chapter 66. 874. article. Binding for Latvia in the European Union the decisions taken with regard to the adoption of a decision laying down the deprivation of liberty is not linked the imposition of (1) the decision of a Member State of the European Union, which determines a security feature unrelated amendment or withdrawal is binding for Latvia. (2) If a Member State of the European Union adopted a decision to amend the decision establishing the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of the General Prosecutor's Office considers this decision and determine the safety feature of this law article 870. If the decision is not recognised and the prohibition or the obligation does not comply with this law, the first paragraph of article 867 of the General Prosecutor's Office refuses to apply the amended security feature. (3) the Chief Public Prosecutor, decide the issue of the decision amending the safety feature, recognition, assessed only this law article 868 points out the reasons for the refusal. 875. article. The notification to the Member State of the European Union (1) national police, using appropriate security measures shall inform the Prosecutor General's Office on: 1) the change of residence of the person; 2) breach of security features, as well as other facts that would cause a further decision on the security features of the adoption of the amendment; 3) failure to execute with non-custodial security measure, because the person is not reachable; 4) hazards can cause the victim and the public. (2) the Prosecutor shall inform the Member States of the European Union: 1) of the decision to refuse to recognise and execute the decision establishing the deprivation of liberty is not related to the application of the security features; 2) for the first part of this article, the conditions listed, as well as the facts, what could be the reasons for the amendment of the security features in determining the period for which the Member State of the European Union for decision. The General Prosecutor's Office shall prepare a report on the specific violations of the prohibitions or obligations, as well as any other matter which may be the basis for the decision below, fill in the relevant penal, in cooperation with the Member States of the European Union for the specific document. (3) the decision taken by the General Prosecutor's Office to terminate the execution of the security instrument, since this law was a 873. the first paragraph of article 6 paragraph 5 of the General conditions shall inform the Member States of the European Union and the police after the person's residence, and the date of execution of the security features in question takes over the European Union. " 61. Consider existing 826, 827, 828..., and 829. article on 876, 877, 878.. and 790. article. 62. Replace article 829.1 in the third paragraph, the word "defined" by the word "special". 63. Replace 829.2 article, second paragraph, the number "with" the number "829.1 880." 64. Considering past, and article 829.1 829.2 829.3 on 880, 881 and 882... article. 65. To supplement the law with 883, 884, 885.., 886. and article 88 as follows: "article 88. Conditions for the decision taken in Latvia, which is determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a shipment to comply with a Member State of the European Union (1) the decision adopted in Latvia, which is determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty not linked security features, you can run the application in a Member State of the European Union, if the person has his permanent place of residence and the person in question has agreed to return to the Member State of the European Union. (2) at the request of the person in Latvia to make a decision that is determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of enforcement can be sent to the Member State of the European Union, even if the person in question in a Member State of the European Union residents, but has indicated in the Member State of the European Union, which it will be achieved, and the Member States of the European Union have declared the following conditions. 884. article. The decision taken in Latvia, which is determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of enforcement for dispatch to the Member State of the European Union (1) if found in this law, the conditions referred to in article 88, the process can turn transforming the General Prosecutor's Office with a written proposal to ask the Member States of the European Union, to the decision establishing a related security measure. (2) the proposal shall indicate this Law 678. the information referred to in article and then add: 1) decision that defines the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of a certified copy of it; 2) the decision on the recognition of the person as a suspect or criminal prosecution in the certified copy; 3 the text of article of the law), after which the person is suspected or known to the criminal liability, as well as the text of the article of the law governing limitation periods and the classification of criminal offences; 4) written consent of the person to execute the security feature in a Member State of the European Union or the person's written request to allow it to return to the relevant Member State of the European Union; 5) other information needed for specific forms of acknowledgement. (3) the suggestion of appearance within 10 days after receipt of the General Prosecutor's Office and the results will inform the driver of the process.

(4) if there is reason to ask for the implementation of the decision, which shall be determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of the General Prosecutor's Office will fill in the special form of receipt and with decisions that determine with associated custodial security measure, sent to the Member State of the European Union. The General Prosecutor's Office provides specific forms of acknowledgement and the decision that the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of a translation of the relevant Member State of the European Union Declaration in the specified language. Specific forms of receipt together with the decision at the same time send to only one Member State of the European Union. (5) if the decision is that determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a process, has appealed to the Prosecutor General's Office submitted for mediation shall inform the Member States of the European Union. 885. article. The decision taken in Latvia, which is determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a fulfillment of the rights (1) the decision laying down the deprivation of liberty is not connected, the imposition of Latvia runs until a Member State of the European Union that recognises this decision. The General Prosecutor's Office of the relevant Member State of the European Union sends a notification process, what with the driver presents a person suitable for the deprivation of liberty without the associated security feature, and explain it to the obligation to attend this European Union Member State to fulfill safety feature. (2) the Chief Public Prosecutor at the request of the promoters of the process, you can undo specific forms of evidence and decision establishing a related security feature, if the relevant Member State of the European Union security feature does not comply with the appropriate safety feature is there not enough safety features, the maximum time limit for execution. (3) Latvia recovered with unrelated security feature execution rights when: 1) after the General Prosecutor's Office at the request of the promoters of the process reference specific forms of evidence and decision establishing a security-related features of the execution in the European Union Member State; 2) Member State of the European Union has transferred back to Latvia by deprivation of liberty for safety related features to be executed, because the person is no longer domiciled in the Member State of the European Union or that person in this country is not reachable; 3) Latvia shall take a decision on the amendment of the security features and a Member State of the European Union refuses to monitor the amended safety feature; 4) expired in a Member State of the European Union the maximum period of application of the security features; 5) of a Member State of the European Union adopted a decision to end the security feature. (4) If coming to the end of the third paragraph of this article, in paragraph 4, the Member States of the European Union specified in the maximum period of application of the security features, by the request of the Prosecutor General's Office submitted a process may request the competent authority of that Member State to extend the application of the security features, giving the extension. 886. article. The right to amend and cancel decisions over a period of time when a Member State of the European Union met in Latvia by deprivation of liberty applied to an unrelated security feature, process driver has the right to amend or repeal the decision on the imposition of this law. 322. article. Action of Latvia by deprivation of liberty for safety features not related to the execution time in a Member State of the European Union (1), the General Prosecutor's Office has received from the request of a Member State of the European Union to provide information on the need to continue appropriate with deprivation of liberty for safety features not related to the enforcement process, shall transmit it to the driver. (2) the driver of the process shall assess the request and received: 1) if the security features of application of application framework is not lost or changed, with the Prosecutor about it shall immediately inform the Member State of the European Union required the imposition date; 2) if security feature during its application, basics is lost or changed, shall take a decision on the security features of the modification or revocation, which with the General Prosecutor's Office shall immediately inform the Member State of the European Union by sending a copy of the decision and the reference to specific forms of proof. (3) the process of with promoters of the Prosecutor shall immediately inform the Member States of the European Union on all the decisions taken which amend or otherwise affect the decision on the application of the security features, as well as the fact that the person is in the lodge, the decisions taken and provide necessary information to avoid a preventive suspension of execution. (4) if the person is a lodge, which is determined by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty are not linked, the imposition of a driver of the process and made a decision to amend the security feature and fix with another unrelated security feature, sending the decision to comply with a Member State of the European Union are carried out in accordance with this law, article 88. In this case, the decision on the security features of the amendment shall enter into force at the moment when the Member State of the European Union that recognises this decision. (5) if necessary, process guide with the General Prosecutor's Office consult with the European Union, the competent authority of the Member State and the decision on the security features of the modification or revocation, taken into account in the relevant Member State of the European Union information on hazards that may cause the victim and society. " 66. Considering past 830 and 831. article on 888 and 889. article. 67. Replace article 832 "." with "the number 831 889.". 68. Considering past 832, 833, 834... 835., 836, 837, 838, 839,..., 840, 841, 842..., and 843 respectively for article 890, 891, 892, 893.., 894, 895, 896., 897, 898, 899.., 900 and 901. article. 69. Replace 844. in the second subparagraph of article numbers and the word "813 — 815, 817.-824 and 825, 820." with numbers and the word "847-849, 851-854.., 859 858. and.." 70. Considering the past 844 845 846.,., and 847. article on 902, 903, 904..., and Article 905. 71. the transitional provisions be supplemented with 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39 of the following paragraph: "33. Cases referred to the District Court of jurisdiction laid down by up to 30 June 2012, pending in the same court in which they are submitted. 34. in the case referred to the District Court as the Court of first instance in the specified jurisdiction until 30 June 2012, the appeal of the order under appeal the ruling of the Supreme Court hears the Criminal Chamber of the Court of appeal. 35. This law, 775. the second paragraph of article 1 and paragraph 823. the second paragraph of article conditions referred to in paragraph 1 shall not apply to international cooperation with Poland until 2016-December 5. In these cases, apply this law, 70 and 78 Department. 36. foreign requests for the transfer of sentenced persons or taking over of sentence the Prosecutor General's Office has received up to 30 June 2012, and for which the examination is completed and accepted one of this law, in article 753 (until 30 June 2012 for the existing version) or 770. Article (until 30 June 2012 for the current version), pending the decisions referred to in the order that was in effect until that date. Request for the transfer of sentenced persons or taking over of sentence in respect of which inspection is not completed by June 30, 2012, to be forwarded for consideration by the Ministry of Justice. 37. foreign requests for enforcement of fines imposed abroad in Latvia, the Ministry of Justice received until June 30, 2012, and in respect of which this Act has been adopted in the decision referred to in article 774 (until 30 June 2012 for the current version), in order that was in effect until that date. Requests for enforcement of fines imposed abroad in Latvia in respect of which inspection is not completed by June 30, 2012, to be forwarded for consideration by the Court. 38. If you have received a request of a Member State of the European Union to recognise and enforce judgments given by 2011. on 27 November, it examines the order that was in effect until June 30, 2012. Latvia's request to the Member State of the European Union to meet in Latvia accepted the ruling, which came in force until 27 November 2011, we will send the order that was in effect until June 30, 2012. 39. This law, 866-875 and 883 article. — Article 887 shall enter into force on December 1, 2012. "
Transitional cabinet within six months from the date of entry into force of the law to develop and adopt the provisions for the procedures for confiscation of property obtained as a result of funds or assets shall be distributed to the foreign countries, and the order in which money funds transferred to foreign countries pursuant to this law, the seventh subparagraph of article 792 and 800 in the sixth paragraph of article. The law shall enter into force on July 1, 2012.
The Parliament adopted the law of 24 may 2012.
The President a. Smith in 2012 on June 13.