Advanced Search

Regulatory Region Number Number 2 2006 2006

Original Language Title: Peraturan Daerah Nomor NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2006 Tahun 2006

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
of law-an invitation that contained the IUP revocation sanctions.

(2) IUP Revocation is carried out by authorized Officials. (3) The Company which has been revoked its IUPS, may submit an objection to

authorized officials no later than 30 (three piluh) working days from the revocation date of IUP.

(4) at least 30 (thirty) days of work since the receipt of the objection, the authorized officer may receive or deny the written objection in writing with the reasons.

(5) In the event of an appeal to be accepted, the revoked IUP is reissued.

4. The provisions of Article 12 are deleted.

5. The provisions of Article 16 are amended so that Article 16 reads as follows:

Article 16

The term of retribution is the length of the term as long as the company concerned is still running the business activities of the trade.

The set Purbalingga County District Rule 2006

Section II

The rules of this section begin to apply to the date of promulgations. In order for everyone to know, ordered the invitational of the Ordinance with its placement in the Purbalingga County Sheet.

promulred in the Purbalingga County Sheet

No. 02 Date 3 Pebruari 2006 DISTRICT SECRETARY OF PURBALINGGA COUNTY

cap. ttd S U B E N O

Specified in Purbalingga on January 28, 2006

BUPATI PURBALINGGA,

cap. ttd

TRIYONO BUDI SASONGKO

Set the Rules of Purbalingga County District 2006

EXPLANATION OF

PURBALINGGA COUNTY COUNTY REGULATION NUMBER 02 OF 2006

ABOUT THE CHANGE TO THE REGIONAL REGULATION OF 8 IN 2001

ABOUT THE TRADE PERMIT LEVY

I. GENERAL EXPLANATION that in order to support investment and grow the business

the economy of society and by basing on the provisions of Article 137 Invite-Invite Number 32 Year 2004 on Regional Governance, then the County Regulation Purbalingga Number 8 of 2001 on the Attribution Permit was not to be compatible and needed to be changed.

The change of the Regional Regulation is also intended as an attempt to increase the competeability of the Regions to the competition. In the era of globalization to improve the well-being of real people and continuous as well as acceptable to the public.

Related to it the Regional Government must conduct internal deregulation policies, remove ineffective internal regulations and provisions and simplify the system The administration is long and inhibit the growth of the Regional Economy.

II. EXPLANATION OF SECTION FOR SECTION

Article I Figure 1 is fairly clear

The number 2 is fairly clear

Article 4 A paragraph (1) which is included in the IUP damage category in this paragraph

is the sobek IUP or because of something so that it says has been unread either partially or entirely.

set the Rules of Purbalingga County District of 2006

Verse (2) In question the date of loss in this paragraph is

the date of the loss of IUP concerned with the missing Letter of Interest from the local Police Station.

Verse (3) Quite clear

Section 4 B referred to as the administration fee in this Section is the cost

used for the IUP publishing settlement process performed by KPPI Officers, this administration fee is managed by KPPI

gai the specific task force in the field of licensing services. seba Article 4 C

Pretty clear

Section 4 D paragraph (1) the letter a Company is given a written warning if:

a. conduct business activities that are not in compliance with the business fields, business activities and the key merchandise/merchandise types listed in the acquired IUP;

b. has not registered its Enterprise in the Company List as defined in the 1982 3rd Year Act on the Mandatory Service of the Company;

c. the report/complaint of the authorized officer or owner and or holder of the rights Intellectual Property (HKI) that the Company in question committed a violation of HKI;

d. A report/complaint from the official authority that the company does not meet the taxation obligations under applicable terms.

Verse (1) the letter b referred to HKI is the Intellectual Property Right as referred to in the Law Number 14 of 2001 on Patent, Invite-Invite Number 15 Year 2001 on Merk and Act No. 19 of 2002 on Copyright.

The set of the County of Purbalingga County District 2006

Verse (2) Pretty clear

Verse (3) Clear enough

Verse (4) Quite clear

paragraph (5) The intended official is

Head of the Office of Licensing and Investment Services which is due to the office of office to provide, freeze and revoke IUP after getting recommodities from the related technical services namely the Trade and Cooperative Industry Service.

Verse (6) Is pretty clear

Article 4 E is pretty clear

Article II Quite clear.

Set the Rules of the County of Purbalingga County of the Year 2006

he Governing Law in the applicable laws.

Article 4 B To obtain the IUP Replacement as referred to in Article 4 A levied the administrative charge of the amount Rp. 40,000,-(forty thousand rupiah).

3. Between Chapter II and Chapter III is inserted 2 (two) Chaps of Chapter II A and II B so that it reads as follows:

BAB II A

THE EXPIRATION IUP

Article 4 C

IUP applies as long as the Company is concerned still running trade venture activities.

CHAPTER II B FREEZING AND REVOCATION

Article 4 D

(1) IUP may be frozen if: a. The company does not heed written warnings from officials who

authorized as many as 3 (three) times in a row with a period of 1 (one) months in the event of an IUP deviation;

b. are currently running the judicial process for being charged with violating HKI and or committing other felon.

(2) During the IUP Company ' s IUP is frozen, the Company is prohibited to conduct business activities Trading.

(3) The term of the IUP freezing time for the Company as referred to in paragraph (1) the letter a valid 6 (six) months from the issuer of the fixed legal power.

(4) The term of the IUP freeze time for The company that is intended to be used in the case of the letter b is valid until the Court of Justice is valid.

(5) IUP Freezing is carried out by the authorized Officer. (6) An already frozen IUP may be reapplied, if the

Enterprise is concerned: a. have heeded the warning by performing an improvement and

performing its obligations in accordance with applicable laws;

b. expressed not to be proven to conduct a violation of HKI and or not committing a criminal act according to the Decree of the Judicial Agency which has a fixed legal force.

Article 4 E

(1) IUP may be revoked if:

a. IUP obtained under the correct or false data of the Company is concerned;

b. The company in question does not perform repairs after exceeding the freezing time limit as referred to as Section 4 D paragraph (3);

c. The company in question has been sentenced to a violation of HKI and or a criminal of the Judicial Agency which has a fixed legal force;

d. The company in question violated the provisions of the rules