Advanced Search

Supreme Court Rule 13 Number 2016

Original Language Title: Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
UTION OF COURT RULING

Part Parts

Criminal Fall

Article 23

(1) The judge may drop criminal charges against the Corporation

or the Dedication, or Corporations and Regents.

(2) The judge sentenced the criminal to be referred to

paragraph (1) is based on each of the laws

which regulates criminal threats against the Corporations

and/or Replacement.

(3) Criminal discharges against the Corporation and/or

The Dedication as specified by paragraph (1) does not close

likely a criminal fallout against another perpetrator

on the basis of the statute provision proved

involved in that criminal.

Second Part

The termination

Section 24

(1) The termination of the ident and non-ident ruling

against the Corporations is made in accordance with the Book of Invite-

Invite the Criminal Event Law (KUHAP).

2016, No. 2058 -15-

(2) The termination of the ident and not the ident of

The corporation as referred to in paragraph (1)

lists the following identity as follows:

a. Corporate name;

b. place, date of foundation and/or budget number

base/deed of establishment/documen/

agreement as well as the last change;

c. place of position;

d. Corporate nationhood;

e. Corporate Type;

f. form activities/businesses; and

g. The identity of the Regents represents.

Article 25

(1) The judge sentenced the corporates to the corporation to be

a principal and/or additional criminal.

(2) the underlying criminal charges against the Corporations

as paragraph (1) is a criminal of a fine.

(3) additional Criminal Code is dropped against the Corporation pursuant to

with the provisions of the laws.

Section 26

In terms of the Corporation and the Urus are submitted together

as a defendant, the verdict and not

the idlers follow the provisions as intended

in Section 24 and Section 25.

Third section

The execution of the ruling

section 27

(1) The implementation of the ruling is based on the verdict

The court which obtained the legal power remains.

(2) The conviction of the ruling may be used as the base in

execution of the ruling as referred to in paragraph

(1).

2016, No. 2058 -16-

Section 28

(1) In terms of criminal fines dropped to

Corporations, Corporations are given a term of 1 (one)

months since the ruling of the legal power remains to

pay a fine That.

(2) In case there is a strong, timeframe

as it is in the paragraph (1) may be extended

at least 1 (one) month.

(3) If the Corporator does not pay a fine

as referred to in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) then

Corporate property may be confiscated by the prosecutor and

is auctioned to pay a fine.

Article 29

(1) In terms of criminal fines is dropped to the Switcher,

The charge is given a 1 (one) month period since

the legal power ruling remains to pay

The fine.

(2) In case there is a strong reason, the term

as referred to in paragraph (1) may be extended

at least 1 (one) month.

(3) If the fine is not paid partially or entirely,

Administrators dropped a penalty substitute for a fine

calculated propotional.

(4) Criminal confinement replacement fines as

referred to in paragraph (3) executed after

end of principal criminal punishment.

Fourth Quarter

Additional Criminal or Orderly Conduct

Against Corporations

Section 30

Additional criminal or other order of order or action

against the Corporation is exercised under a ruling

The Court.

2016, No. 2058 -17-

Section 31

(1) In terms of additional criminal charges

in the case of evidence of evidence, then the appropriation

evidence item is held at least 1 (one) month

since the ruling Fixed legal strength.

(2) In case there is a strong reason, the term

as it is in paragraph (2) can be extended

at least 1 (one) month.

(3) In case there is a wealth of wealth

arising from the outcome of the crime then the whole

those gains were usurpated for the country.

Section 32

(1) Corporations are subject to additional criminal charges

replacement, damages and restitution, manners

The implementation is performed according to the provisions

laws.

(2) In case of additional penal money,

damages and restitution are dropped to the Corporation,

Corporations are given the longest term of 1 (one)

months since the ruling of the legal power remains to

pay for replacement money, damages and restitution.

(3) In case there is a strong, timeframe

as it is in paragraph (2) may be extended

for the most prolonged 1 (one) month.

(4) If the Corporations are penalized not pay the money

replacement, restitution and restitution as

referred In verse (2) and paragraph (3), the property

can be confiscated by the prosecutor and auctioned for

pay the replacement money, damages and restitution.

Article 33

The corporates are charged in addition to improvements

damages resulting from criminal acts, grammar

implementation is conducted in accordance with the provisions

laws.

2016, No. 2058 -18-

BAB IV

LAIN-LAIN provisions

Article 34

This Supreme Court Regulation cannot be the basis

for legal efforts against criminal matters by the Corporation

which it has broke up before this Supreme Court Rule

promulgled.

BAB V

TRANSITIONAL provisions

Article 35

The criminal Perkara with the Corporation defendant who has

is granted to the court remains continued until

obtain a court ruling that has power

the law persists by referring to the regulatory provisions

applicable laws before the presence of

This Supreme Court Regulation.

BAB VI

provisions CLOSING

Article 36

At the time of this Court Rule to come into effect, the provisions

handling criminal cases by Corporations follow

This Supreme Court Regulation.

Article 37

This Supreme Court Regulation is beginning to take effect on the date

promulgated.

2016, No. 2058 -19-

For everyone to know, ordered

the invitational of this Supreme Court Regulation with

its placement>the cash deposit of that citybody auction.

2016, No. 2058 -14-

Ninth Section

The Removal Of Criminal Authority and

Running Criminal

Article 22

Authorization to prosecute criminal and run criminal

against the Wipe Corporation Due to an expiration or expiration of the Cloud Service, the terms set out in the Law of the Law

(Criminal Code).

BAB III

RULING AND EXEC