Regulation Of The Minister Of Transportation Number Pm 12 2013

Original Language Title: Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 12 Tahun 2013

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now

Read the untranslated law here: http://peraturan.go.id/inc/view/11e44c50d244bd408b58313233313133.html

bn317-2013 fnHeader (); The text is not in the original format.
Back NEWS REPUBLIC of INDONESIA No. 317, 2013 the MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Performance Indicators. Measurements. The guidelines.

REGULATION of the MINISTER of TRANSPORT of the REPUBLIC of INDONESIA NUMBER 12 pm. 2013 ABOUT MEASUREMENT of PERFORMANCE INDICATORS in the GUIDELINES of the ENVIRONMENT MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION with the GRACE of GOD ALMIGHTY MINISTER of TRANSPORT of the REPUBLIC of INDONESIA, Considering: a. that the drafting and implementation in the framework of the evaluation report of the performance accountability of government agencies (LAKIP), has assigned Minister of transportation Regulation Number pm. 88 in 2010 on guidelines for the measurement of performance indicators in the Environment Ministry of transportation;
b. that the regulation of the Minister of transportation Number PM. 88 in 2010 on guidelines for the measurement of performance indicators in the Environment Ministry of transportation referred to in letter a, is not in accordance with the conditions and requirements so that needs to be enhanced;
c. that based on considerations as referred to in subparagraph b above, the need to establish Regulations the Minister of transportation of the manual measurement of performance indicators in the Environment Ministry of transportation;
Remember: 1. Act No. 17 of 2003 about State Finances (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 47 in 2003, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4286);
2. Act No. 1 of 2004 on the Treasury of the State (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia in 2004, an additional Sheet No. 5 of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4355);
3. Act No. 3 of 2004 concerning the examination of the management and financial responsibility of the State (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 66 in 2004, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4400);
4. Act No. 39 of 2008 of the Ministry of State (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 166 in 2008, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4916);
5. Government Regulation Number 24 of 2005 about Governmental accounting standards (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 49 in 2005, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4503);
6. Government Regulation number 6 in 2006 about the management of Goods belonging to the country/region (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 in 2006, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4609) as amended by the Government Regulation Number 38 in 2008 (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 78 in 2008, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4855);
7. Government Regulation No. 8 of 2006 about financial reporting and performance of government agencies (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia number 25 in 2006, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4614);
8. Government Regulation Number 39 in 2006 about the procedures for control and evaluation of the implementation of the development plan (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 96 in 2006, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4663);
9. Government Regulation Number 40 in 2006 about the procedures for the preparation of the national development plan (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 97 in 2006, an additional Sheet of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4664);
10. Presidential regulation Number 24 of 2010 about the position, duties, and functions of the Ministries as well as the Organization, duties and functions of the Echelon I Ministry as amended last presidential regulation Number 92 in 2011;
11. Presidential regulation Number 47 in 2009 about the formation and organization of the Ministries, as amended by regulation of the President Number 91 in 2011;
12. the presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2010 about the national medium term development plan 2010-2014;
13. Presidential regulation Number 24 of 2010 about the position, duties, and functions of the Ministries as well as the Organization, duties and functions of the Echelon I ministries, as amended last presidential regulation Number 92 in 2011;
14. Presidential Instruction number 7 in 1999 about the performance accountability of government agencies;
15. Regulation of the Minister of transportation KM Number 7 in 2012 of the Ministry of transportation strategic plan Years 2012-2014;
16. Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform State number PER/9/URM.PAN/5/2007 on the General guidelines for the determination of the Main performance indicators in Environmental government agencies;
17. Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform State number PER/20/URM.PAN/11/2008 about the instructions for preparing the major Performance Indicators;
18. Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform And the bureaucratic State apparatus Number 29 in 2010 on guidelines for the preparation of the determination of Performance and reporting performance accountability of government agencies;
19. Regulation of the Minister of transportation Number KM 60 of 2010 about the Organization and the work of the Ministry of transportation;
20. Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform and the State Bureaucracy Apartur number 25 in 2012 on the evaluation Guidelines performance accountability of government agencies;
Decide: define: REGULATION of the MINISTER of TRANSPORTATION of MEASUREMENT GUIDELINES PERFORMANCE INDICATORS in the ENVIRONMENT MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION.
CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS article 1 In this ministerial regulation is: 1. Performance Accountability Report hereinafter abbreviated LAKIP is reporting performance accountability of government agencies which are yearly that contains a performance liability agencies in achieving goals/strategic objectives of agencies.
2. Main performance indicators, hereinafter abbreviated as IKU, is a measure of the success of the strategic goals and objectives of an organization.
3. Performance indicators Activities, hereinafter abbreviated IKK, is a measure of the performance of the implementation activities in producing goods and services in accordance with planned in order to achieve goals and objectives of the organization.
4. Performance measurement is the process of systematically and continuously to assess the successes and failures of implementation activities in accordance with the programs, policies, goals and objectives that have been set in realizing the vision, mission and strategy of government agencies.
5. Determination of Performance which further abbreviated PK is a performance that will be realized within 1 (one) years by a head of work Unit supervisor Directly.
6. Performance targets is a value or nothing IKU or IKK targeted will be achieved by Units Working within 1 (one) year contained in document Performance Assignment.
7. Product Performance is the value or nothing IKU or IKK was reached by work Unit in a certain period of time.
8. Input (Input) is everything that is needed in order for the implementation of the activities and programs can be running or in order to generate output, such as human resources, funds, material, time, technology, and so on.
9. Output (Output) is goods or services generated by the activities undertaken to support the achievement of the goals and objectives of the programs and policies.
10. The results (Outcomes) is something which reflects the proper functioning of the outputs of activities within 1 (one) program.
11. Benefit (Benefit) is the perceived usefulness of an output directly by the people.
12. Impact (Impact) is a measure of the level of influence social, economic, environmental or other public interests initiated by close to the performance of each indicator in a given activity.
13. Efficiency is the degree of connection between the goods and services that are generated through a program/activity and the resources necessary to produce the goods and services as measured by the cost per unit of output (Output).
14. The effectiveness is a measure that indicates how far the programs/activities to achieve the expected results and benefits.
15. The benefit is a condition that is expected to be achieved when the output (Output) can be solved timely, precise location, and right on target as well as functioning with optimal.
16. The Minister is the Minister of transportation.
17. Work units is Organizational Unit Level Echelon Echelon I, II, and Self-contained work units (units Technical Implementers/UPT) in the Environment Ministry of transportation that carry out certain programs and activities in achieving performance goals and objectives that have been set.
CHAPTER II OBJECTIVES and the SCOPE of article 2 (1) the purpose of the establishment of guidelines for the measurement of performance indicators in the Environment Ministry of transportation, used as a guide for work Unit Echelon Echelon I, II and Independent work Unit-level Echelon II (UPT) in measuring success and/or failure of the implementation of the program and activity (product performance) that have been defined in the setting of performance.
(2) Product Performance as referred to in paragraph (1), is used to assess the progress that has been achieved in work units meets the performance targets set out in the Performance Assignment.
Article 3 scope of the guidelines for the measurement of performance indicators in the Environment Ministry of transportation arrangements, including: a. performance indicators;

b. the implementation of performance measurement;

c. follow-up to the results of performance measurement.

Chapter 4 performance measurement consists of: a. Primary performance measurement (PKU) to the level of the Ministry and the work Unit Echelons I; and b. performance measurement activities (PKK) work Unit Echelon II and Independent work Unit (UPT).

CHAPTER III section 5 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS performance indicators referred to in article 3 a, can be categorized as: a. Input (Input);

b. Output (Output);

c. the results (Outcomes);

d. benefits (Benefits); and e. Impacts (Impact).

Article 6 (1) major Performance Indicators work Unit Echelons I should be aligned with the major Performance Indicators of the Ministry and the Work Unit Activities performance indicators Echelon II and Independent work Unit (UPT).

(2) major Performance Indicators at each level of the organizational unit includes performance indicators Outputs (Output), and the results (Outcomes), with the following conditions: a. the main Performance Indicator (IKU) at the level of the Ministry, at the lack of is an indicator of results (Outcomes) in accordance with the powers, duties and functions;
b. major Performance Indicators (IKU) at the work Unit level Echelon I is an indicator of the results (Outcomes) and/or Output (Output) the higher level of Output (Output) work Unit underneath it;
c. performance indicators activities (IKK) at the work Unit Level Echelon II and Independent work Unit (UPT), at least one is an indicator of the output (Output).
Article 7 (1) IKU and IKK is specified and is valid in accordance with the strategic plan of each work Unit, i.e. every 5 (five) years.
(2) in the IKU and IKK should consider some of the following: a. the vision and mission of the Ministry of transportation;
b. Document National medium term development plan (RPJM), strategic plan (RENSTRA), Public Policy, and/or other relevant strategic documents;
c. Field authorities, duties and functions, as well as other roles;
d. information needs for the performance of the performance accountability;
e. statistical data Needs of Government;
f. Prevalence in specific areas, and the development of science.
(3) the IKU and IKK can be changed before the time period referred to in subsection (1), in the event of: a. a change/revision of the strategic plan;

b. changes in legislation related to the duties and functions of the Ministry or a particular work Unit;

c. the negative impact on the performance of the work Unit as a whole.
(4) changes and IKU IKK as referred to in paragraph (3), must be set up by following the conditions as referred to in article 6 and article 7 paragraph (2).
CHAPTER IV PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IMPLEMENTATION of article 8 (1) the implementation of the main performance measurement (PKU) and performance measurement activities (PKK), may be made on the basis of several categories as follows: a. Periodic performance measurement conducted each 1 (one) month, or three (3) months, or 6 (six) months of the performance management system according to needs;
b. performance measurement end of the year, conducted at the end of the current year to find out the level of compliance against the performance targets;
c. incidental, performance measurement may be done at any time on orders from superiors.
(2) Periodic performance measurement referred to in paragraph (1) letter a, is used to draw up the strategies and operational policies set out so that performance targets can be achieved at the end of the current year.
(3) measurement of the performance of the end of the year as referred to in paragraph (1) letter b, is used as a basis for compiling reports performance accountability work units.
(4) the incidental performance measurement referred to in paragraph (2) Letter c, is used as the performance accountability of Heads of work units to Direct Supervisor.
Article 9 (1) the implementation of performance measurement was conducted by: a. General Secretary, to carry out the main performance measurement (PKU) level of the Ministry;
b. the Secretary General Inspectorate, Secretary of the Directorate General, the Secretary of the Agency, the head of the Bureau of planning, to carry out the main performance measurement (PKU) Work Unit Level Echelon I at the Environment Ministry of transportation;
c. The Leadership Echelon II work units and Self-contained work units (UPT), to implement performance measurement activities (PKK) work Unit in question.
(2) the implementation of performance measurement as mentioned in subsection (1), should be aligned Between the work Unit Level.
Article 10 the alignment Between performance measurement work Unit, as referred to in article 9 paragraph (2), coordinated by: a. the Secretary-General, for the alignment of the main performance measurement (PKU) level of the Ministry;
b. the Secretary General Inspectorate, Secretary of the Directorate General, the Secretary of the Agency, the head of the Bureau of planning, for the alignment of the main performance measurement (PKU) Work Unit Level Echelon I question.
Article 11 the technical implementation of the performance measurement conducted by each work Unit, through the stages of the following activities: a. the collection of performance data;

b. validation of performance data;

c. form completion performance measurement.

Article 12 (1) the collection of performance data referred to in article 11 a, done to get performance data associated with IKU and IKK.
(2) the collection of performance data referred to in subsection (1), should be done in a planned and systematic way by considering the availability of existing data as well as the efficiency of the resources needed.
Article 13 validation of the performance data referred to in article 11 letter b, shall be: a. Specific;

b. Measurable;

c. accurate, definitively stated the size of the Product performance of the work Unit;

d. complete, covers all aspects of performance that need to be assessed/measured;
e. representative, able to describe the Product performance of work units at the time the measurement is performed, is associated with factors that affect;
f. Data comes from sources that can be accounted for.
Article 14 (1) Charging performance form referred to in article 11 c, the grain is done by the use of: a. performance measurement of the main Forms (PKU), which describes Nothing major Performance Indicators (IKU) at the time the measurement was done;
b. Forms performance measurement activities (PKK), which describes the Product performance indicators activities (IKK) at the time the measurement is done.
(2) the form Filling instructions and Ministry Level PKU pengisiannya submitted using the Format as contained in Annex I of the regulation of the Minister.
(3) the form Filling Work Unit Level Echelon PKU I and pengisiannya instructions submitted using the Format as contained in annex II to this regulation of the Minister.
(4) Forms a work Unit Level PKK Echelon II and Independent work Unit (UPT) and instructions pengisiannya delivered by using the Format as contained in Annex III to this regulation of the Minister.
Chapter V FOLLOW-UP RESULTS PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Section 3 performance measurement Results are implemented by each work Unit followed up with: a. the submission of the report to the leadership of the work Unit, the direct Supervisor, or the parties concerned;
b. do the performance improvement efforts on the basis of the results of the findings/conclusions and recommendations generated.
Article 16 Reporting performance measurement results as stipulated in article 15, the letter a is done with the following conditions: a. the results of Periodic performance measurement performance measurement and results of Incidental reported in writing to the chairmanship of the working Unit, then distributed to the parties concerned;
b. performance measurement end of year Results reported as part of the performance accountability report of the work Unit concerned.
Article 17 performance improvement efforts as stipulated in article 15, the letter b is done with the following conditions: a. Recommendations the results of Periodic performance measurement performance measurement results and actionable by the arrangement of the incidental or a change in operating policy to maintain and/or improve the performance of the whole management elements in the work units, with the goal of keeping a defined Performance Targets can be achieved optimally at the end of the current year;
b. the repair Attempts performed work Unit performance measurement results over Year-end held, having retrieved the recommendations of the Report evaluation results (LHE) against performance accountability Report carried out by the Ministry for administrative And Bureaucratic reform of the State apparatus and/or Inspectorate General.
CHAPTER VI CLOSING PROVISIONS Article 18 at the time of this Ministerial Regulation took effect, then Transport Minister Regulation Number pm. 88 in 2010 on guidelines for the measurement of performance indicators in the Environment Ministry of transportation, revoked and declared inapplicable.

Article 19 this Ministerial Regulation comes into force on the date of promulgation.

In order to make everyone aware of it, ordered the enactment of this Ministerial Regulation with its placement in the news of the Republic of Indonesia.

Established in Jakarta on February 18, 2013 TRANSPORT MINISTER of the REPUBLIC of INDONESIA, E.E. MANGINDAAN Enacted in Jakarta on February 25, 1995 the MINISTER of LAW and HUMAN RIGHTS REPUBLIC of INDONESIA, AMIR SYAMSUDDIN fnFooter ();