Advanced Search

Rationalisation And Improvement Of The Dispensing Of Criminal Justice

Original Language Title: Rationalisation and improvement of the dispensing of criminal justice

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

CHAPTER A ' AMENDMENTS TO THE CRIMINAL CODE

Article 6

Article 82 of the Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 1. The restriction of freedom, which does not exceed one year, is converted into a financial penalty or fines. The restriction on freedom to be applied for more than one year and not more than two is subject to a financial penalty, unless the perpetrator is a subject and the court with a decision of the Court of Justice considers that it is necessary to do so. (v) to prevent the perpetrator from committing other criminal offences. The restriction of freedom which is more than two years and does not exceed three years shall be converted into a financial penalty, unless the Court of Justice has a specific reasoned opinion; it considers that its conversion is to be avoided in order to prevent it. Action by the end of other criminal offences.

2. The amount of the conversion shall be determined by a specific decision, taking into account the personal and financial situation of the offender, for the purpose of which is to take into account the net average of its work on average. Each day, other income and property, as well as his family obligations. Other obligations may also be taken into account by the Court.

3. Each prison day is calculated at an amount of three (3) euro to 100 (100) euro and each day of booking in an amount of one (1) euro to thirty (30) euro. A joint decision by the Ministers for Justice, Human Rights and Human Rights and Economic and Financial Affairs may increase the amounts provided for in this Regulation.

The restriction of the freedom of criminal proceedings. 4. After the torque of the custodial

The Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the Court of Justice of the European Union. If it is found that there is a breach of direct payment or that the payment would involve the failure to pay the allowance to the victim, the court shall determine a time limit, from two to three years, to make it into the institution to pay the person who has been convicted. The above amount in instalments, which defines the same order.

5. If the person who has been convicted will not be able to pay the amount of conversion within the time-limit of the preceding paragraph, the Court shall further further the financial penalty or the fines, in whole or in part, in a provision A joint task, provided that it is agreed or is requested by the person who has been tried. In this case, the court shall determine the number of hours of community service ranging from 100 to 240 hours for one year, 241 to 480 hours for a sentence of one to two years and 481 to 720 hours for a penalty of two to three years, and Appoint and delay not more than three years for their execution.

6. The community service is provided without a mutual assistance in the services of the State, the local authorities, the legal persons of the public sector or non-profit-making non-profit legal persons, or other entities, defined by Decision of the Minister for Justice, Transparency and Human Rights and any associated ministers. It may also apply to the provision of services to the applicant, if its assent exists. The performance of the joint task shall be supervised by the adjudicator of legal assistance, unless the court orders otherwise. The same Ministerial Decision also sets out

MEMBER OF THE GREEK EXCERPT

First, From the Minutes of Monday, 21 December 2010, No Meetings of the Assembly of the House, in which

Exp. The following draft law was adopted:

Rationalization and improvement in criminal justice and other provisions

The organisation of the benefit of the benefit, the choice, the award and supervision of the work concerned, and any other relevant details.

7. If the work is provided by the person who was commuted or paid in full with his own fault, the prosecution of the sentence may, after taking into account the frequency and seriousness of the breach of the obligations by the sentenced person, the degree of (b) extend the time-limit for the execution of the operation up to an additional year; (c) authorise the execution of the financial penalty; or Of the protégé, which had originally been imposed after the conversion of freedom of movement (d) increase or limit the number of hours of benefit of the benefit of the benefit to be paid by the institution of the place of employment in the territory of the Member State in which the worker is employed. Correspond to the duration of the custodial sentence imposed initially, (e) order the death of a custodial sentence of one to three months for a penalty payment of up to 240 hours, two to five months for a period of time; A joint benefit of more than 240 and up to 480 hours and four to eight months for penalty In the case of a joint benefit of more than 480 hours, it shall order the award of the custodial sentence which had been imposed prior to the conversion.

8. If after the transfer of a custodial sentence to a financial or protective case, there is a substantial change in the terms of the personal and financial situation of the person who has been sentenced, he may be alive by the same court; or An extension of the time-limit for the payment of the financial penalty, which may not exceed two years, or a modification of the amount of the conversion or even the modification of the financial penalty in a joint-service offering to the measure appointed by the court. In the same decision, the consequences of the failure to comply with the obligations.

9. The restrictive custodial sentence, which has been transformed into financial or pro-active work, retains the character of the restriction of liberty and after partial or total detention of the sentence in question. It has been converted.

10. The conversion in the previous parafs is excluded in the case of a conviction for a drug-related crime. Pensions of the Penal Code or of special criminal laws, which exclude or otherwise regulate the conversion of custodial sentences in financial or pre-empt, or undermine the concept of conversion, without prejudice to the provisions of the Penal Code. The preceding subparagraph.

11. The application of this article does not require an unsolicited conviction.

12. If the court has failed to give a ruling on the penalty of deprivation of liberty, the person who has been sentenced, by application to the court which has given the decision, may request the conversion. '

Article 2

Paragraph 1 of Article 99 of the Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 1. If a person who has not been convicted of unsolicited or pleas in a restriction of freedom of more than one year, by one or more of the decisions which the penalties are not subject to overall the upper limit, shall be sentenced to A penalty not exceeding three years, the court with its decision shall order the suspension of enforcement of the sentence for a period which may not be less than one and more than three years, unless it is based on a specific basis. (b) in the context of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the Court of Justice of the European Union Necessary to prevent the convicted felon from committing new offences. The time of suspension cannot be shorter than the duration of the sentence. The suspension of the sentence may not be conditional on the prior payment of the costs. '.

Article 3

The title and Article 100 of the Penal Code are replaced by the following:

" Article 100 Suspension in sentences of more than three years.

Suspend under supervision

1. If a person is sentenced to a prison sentence of more than three years and the condition laid down in Article 99 (1) is met, the Judge shall order the suspension of the sentence of the sentence of the sentence and the probation officer. On a social assistance basis, for a certain period of time, which may not be less than three and more than five years, unless it considers on the basis of a specific point of view on the grounds of the decision that the enforcement of the sentence is entirely Necessary to prevent the convicted felon from committing new offences.

2. Relief and supervision by the official community relief shall include weekly sessions with the sentenced person, individually or together with other convicts for similar crimes, in the context of an attempt to raise awareness of The Committee of the European Parliament, the Council and the European Parliament, the Council, the European Parliament, the Council and the European Parliament, the Council, the European Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Parliament and the Council The defendant also owns the supervision of the fulfilment of the conditions imposed by the court and the submission by the competent prosecutor of a report by six months. It shall in the same way indicate immediately any serious breach of the conditions laid down in the judgment.

3. The court with the probation decision shall notify the person who has been convicted of the conditions under which it is granted, and the terms, diazepatics or cumulatively, may be: (a) The distance of the damage caused to the (b) The obligation of the sentenced person to fulfil its obligations

2

(c) The withdrawal of the driving licence for a period of up to one, if the act constitutes a serious infringement of the driving licence (s); (d) Elimination prohibition Of a Judge without permission from his or her usual place of residence or from another place to be designated by the court. The degree of removal, which must be written and provisional, is granted to the prosecutor by the Public Prosecutor, on a proposal from the Social Security Officer, exclusively for work, studies, health, or (e) The removal of a passport or other equivalent travel document and the exit ban from the country, unless it has been granted in this case, in the case of a licence under (d), an exit permit, which cannot Exceeding one month. (f) The prohibition of rapprochement or communication with certain persons. (g) The fulfilment of obligations in respect of maintenance or relief to other persons. (h) The death sentence of the sentenced person to treatment or special treatment; (i) a certain amount of up to ten thousand (10,000) euro in public interest. The suspension of enforcement may not be dependent on the previous payment of the costs.

4. If, during the suspension of the sentence, the person who has been convicted violates the conditions laid down and the obligation to participate in the meetings organized by the social assistance adjuster, the court which issued the decision, At the request of the competent prosecutor, he shall decide whether to order the revocation of the suspension. If this court is a grand juridical or quasi-sworn duty, it shall be the tri-delle and a five-member court of appeal respectively. The suspension of the suspension shall be ordered by the Court of Justice if the Court considers that the violations are both important and serious so that the detention of the custodial sentence is now required in order to be determined by the end of the sentence. Acts adopted by the Council.

5. In the preceding paragraph, at the request of the competent prosecutor or the person convicted, he may decide to amend the conditions, composition or prolongation of the surveillance period or the complete abolition of surveillance. While maintaining the suspension of the sentence, in so far as it considers that this is required by the general conduct of the sentenced person during the sentence of the sentence. A new application for the sentenced person may be submitted over a period of six months from the point of view of the previous ".

Article 4

1. Article 105 of the Penal Code is added to paragraph 3, as follows, and paragraphs 3 to 5 of this Code are numbered 4 to 6:

' 3. In prison sentences which have not been carried out, if they have been assessed in any way in any way, the tripartite court-martial of the Member State shall take the place of such a penalty in a financial penalty and order the discharge of the state of custody.

The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Union Any decision by the sentenced person may appeal. If the court considers that the sentenced person is in a-polarised financial defence to pay the financial penalty, it shall be subject to a penalty of benefit in accordance with Article 82 (5). For the rest, paragraphs 6 to 8 of Article 82 are applicable accordingly. '

2. Article 105 of the Penal Code is added to paragraph 7, as follows:

' 7. Each day of remains in a state penitentiary in a state of depression or pain, multiple sclerosis, or have been subjected to cardiac transplant surgery, liver, kidney or myeload, or are carriers of an acquired immune system. In the case of severe neoplasms or from kidney failure, for which regular dialysis is performed and from tuberculosis during the course of treatment, it is considered beneficial as two days of an estimated sentence. The same applies to: (a) for any medical condition known to be in the health insurance committee of 80 % or more, b) for any period of time for as long as their minor children are with them. For the benefit of the measure, the Department of Corrections is responsible for the benefit of the Pensionist Code, at the request of the State, and a proposal by the Council of Labour Council. The par. Article 46 of the EC Treaty Regulation (EC) No 2776/1999, as applicable, to be applied as appropriate for the disciplinary action of the above-held prisoners'.

Article 5

1. The paragraphs after the first paragraph of Article 56 of the Code shall be replaced by the following:

' He who has been sentenced to a prison term and has exceeded the week of his age, is serving the sentence or the remainder of the sentence in his or her residence, unless a special statement of reasons is deemed to be the sentence of the sentence in a detention order. It is absolutely necessary in order to prevent other relevant weightings from being committed. If the above age has been met in the judgment of the Court, it shall be decided by the court imposing the sentence. In any other case, it shall decide on the advice of a plethora of pleas at the request of the conviction. In this case, the sentenced persons are required to appear on the first day of each month in the police department of their place of residence. If they fail to fulfil their obligations, the Prosecutor's Office shall, by assessing the frequency of faculties and the reasons for which it is due, shall: (b) order the fulfilment of their sentence which may not exceed one month in the detention order or (c) order the detention of their sentence in the detention order. The provision of Article 105 has a similar effect here. '

2. Article 256 of the Penal Code after the word

3

'property' shall be added 'or the property of a legal person governed by public law,'.

Article 6

1. Article 384 of the Penal Code is replaced by the following:

" Article 384 Satisfaction of the product

1. The criminal offence referred to in Articles 372-374, 375-377, 381 and 382 shall be eliminated if the person responsible for his own will and before considering any means for his act by the authorities shall render without prejudice to a third party damage or satisfaction. Total loss of life. The partial reimbursement or satisfaction eliminates the punishable offence in the respective single part.

2. If the perpetrator of the acts referred to in paragraph 1, to the pursuit of criminal prosecution, without any unlawful failure of a third party, the claimant or his or her successors shall declare that they have no other claim from the act or have completely satisfied the injured party; By way of record or by a statement of the liability or of its heirs, capital and interest, no criminal prosecution and the case shall be taken in the file with a reasoned act of the entry of the vessel.

3. The perpetrator of the goods referred to in Articles 372, 373, 375-377, 381 and 382 shall be exempt from any penalty if, by the end of the evidentiary trial in the original court, it shall render the law and declare the words or their successors. That they do not have any other claim from the act or, on the other hand, to the satisfaction of the injured party, by paying off or by a declaration of the liability or of its heirs, the capital and interest of the superseil.

4. In the attempt of the acts referred to in paragraph 1, a statement by the deceased person or his heirs that they have been satisfied.

5. The statement of the deceased or his heirs that they were satisfied entirely applies to all participants, except those who declare that they do not accept it. ';

2. After Article 406 of the Penal Code, Article 406A is added as follows:

" Article 406A Satisfaction of the disease

1. The criminal offence referred to in Articles 386 to 406 is eliminated if the person responsible for his own will and before considering in any way for his act by the authorities entirely satisfies the compensation. Partial satisfaction eliminates the punishable offence in the respective single part.

2. If the perpetrator of the acts referred to in paragraph 1, until the pursuit of criminal prosecution, he/she accedes to the injured party, by paying a debtor or a declaration of the deceased or his heirs, the capital and interest of overtime, shall not be moved. The Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice

3. The perpetrator of the goods, as provided for in Articles 386 to 406, shall be exempt from any penalty if, by the end of the probative procedure in the original court, he/she has completely satisfied the person who has been employed, by paying off or against. A statement of the liability or heirs of the capital and interest of overtime.

4. The provisions of Article 384 (4) and (5) shall be amended accordingly.

5. The crime referred to in Article 390 shall not apply to the provisions of the above paragraphs where the act is directed against the public, legal persons of public law and local authorities of a first and second degree. ';

Article 7

Paragraph 3 of Article 374a of the Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 3. The provision of Article 384 shall also apply to the crime referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, together with the performance of the Constitution, in any event and the total satisfaction of the person concerned. ';

CHAPTER B AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Article 8

Paragraph 3 of Article 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

' 3. The preliminary examination is concise and the period of time between the competent authority referred to in Article 36 to inform the competent authority may not exceed three months. In exceptional cases, such time may be extended up to three months or, in the light of the nature of the case or the act to be carried out, for a reasonable period of time, with a specific justified act of the prosecutor. To be used in a case-by-case basis. ';

Article 9

1. Paragraph 1 of Article 43 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 1. The prosecutor, when he or she receives the complaint, moves the prosecution, ordering criticism or questioning, or by introducing the case to the court, call the defendant to the hearing, where it is provided for. (b) Article 79 (b) of Article 79 (b) of Article 79 (b) of Article 79 (b) of Article 79 (b) of the EC Treaty. (c) Article 17 (2) (c) of Regulation (EEC) No 5960/1933 and Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 86/1967; 8 of n. Regulation (EEC) No 1337/1983 and the first subparagraph of paragraph 1. Article 83 of the EC Treaty (d) Article 25 of Law No 3386/2005 No 1882/1990 and the first subparagraph of paragraph 1. (4) Article 43 of the EEC Treaty and Article 23 (e). On him. 248/1914, he moves the political persecution only if foreplay has been carried out;

4

The Committee of the Rules of the European Economic and Financial Committee Article 243 and Article 243 gives sufficient evidence to initiate criminal proceedings. In addition, a preliminary examination may not be carried out as long as it has been preceded by a e-normative administrative examination or there is a conclusion or report by the General Inspectorate of Public Administration or Service or the Inspection and Control Service of the institutions. Article 1 (2) of the Law No 3074/2002 and sufficient evidence to proceed with the prosecution. '

2. In Article 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a new paragraph 3 is inserted as follows:

' 3. The competent prosecutor shall recover the file from the file only when new facts or evidence are invoked or reported, which shall, at the time of his or her judgment, be re-examined. In such a case, it shall summon the message or to the detriment of which the preliminary examination has been carried out to provide explanations. ';

3. Paragraph 3 of Article 47 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 3. Articles 43 (1) and (3), (44) and (45) shall apply to the appeal. ';

Article 10

1. Paragraph 7 of Article 111 of the Code of Penal Code shall be referred to in paragraph 6 and shall be replaced by the following:

' 6. The members of the judiciary, criminal and administrative justice and prosecutors, members of the Presidents, peacekeepers, experts, members of the Council of E-resentment, presidents, rapporteurs and experts. Of the members of the Court of Auditors, of the members of the Court of Auditors, of the chairs, of the rapporteurs and of its rapporteurs, of the General Commissioner, Commissioners and Vice-Presidents of the Court of Auditors, as well as of the general commissioner, Commissioners and Vice-Presidents To the ordinary courts, lawyers and members of the Legal Council Council of the State. '.

2. Paragraph 8 of Article 111 of the Code of Penal Code shall be referred to in paragraph 7 and shall be replaced by the following:

' 7. Appeals against decisions of the tripartite Court, against decisions adopted by the Court of First Instance in the case of Article 116 (1) and against decisions of the Court of Appeals in accordance with Article 499. ';

3. Paragraph 2 of Article 112 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 2. The bodies of the persons referred to in Article 111 (6). '

4. Article 114 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

" Article 114 Single floating-court

The Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the Court of Justice of the European Union

Imprisonment with a minimum threshold of less than one year or a financial penalty, or both, except:

(a) those within the competence of the Member States;

The courts and courts of the courts and the courts and the courts (Articles 109, 111, 128);

(b) those falling within the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice;

(c) those of Articles 259 and 302 of the Penal Code and of the defamation of the press.

(2) Appeals against decisions of the Court of Justice and of judgments delivered by the Court of Justice in accordance with Article 116 (1). '

Article 11

1. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of Article 142 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be reduced to 5 and 6, as follows, and paragraph 3 is added after paragraph 3:

' 4. The previous paragraph shall be applied and: 1) in the decisions of the Court of First Instance.

(a) where they are procrastination, unless they are ordered to do so;

(b) when they are issued following an appeal against a decision;

(c) when the prosecution ceases the criminal proceedings as a result of death;

Of or due to the withdrawal of the crime, (d) where they are exculpatory, if the prosecution had

The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Union and of the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Union

(e) where the defendant is guilty of misconduct and the defendant is not subject to appeals, unless they order a return on confiscation and confiscation and confiscation of confiscated property.

(a) when they are issued following an appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance;

The names of the members of the Court of First Instance, for which the record is to be entered in a special book,

(b) when they are procrastination, unless they are ordered to produce evidence;

(c) when the prosecution ceases criminal proceedings as a result of the death of the accused or the revocation of the crime;

(d) when they are issued following an appeal and are acquitted, provided that there is no pathway or a performance of a civil action unless they order a return on confiscation or seizure and confiscation of confiscation and confiscation;

(e) where it is a convicted felon and the sentence imposed is not applicable, unless the seizure or seizure of seizure and confiscation of confiscated property has been issued;

When referring to personal injury from a defect in respect of which the prosecution ceases definitively in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 315 (1). ';

2. Point (d) of Article 171 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by:

(d) the appearance, representation and defence of the accused and the exercise of the rights conferred upon him by law, the European Convention for the Protection of the Rights of the Party and Fundamental Freedoms and the International President. - The next item is the statement by the President-in-Office of the Council.

5

Article 12

1. Paragraph 4 of Article 243 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 4. The period referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 245 may not exceed three months for the purpose of the preliminary investigation procedure. In exceptional cases, such time may be extended up to three months or, in the light of the nature of the case or the operation to be carried out, for a reasonable period of time, with a duly justified act of the Advocate-General. Of which:

2. Paragraph 4 of Article 248 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 4. The investigating officer shall have to close the main complaint within eight months and the supplementary interrogation by the Council in two or more months after the brief has come to him. In exceptional cases, such periods may be extended for a one-off period of up to two months on the basis of a statement of reasons in each case of the Council, in which the interrogator is addressed before the conclusion of the above timelimits. If the nature of the case or the act to be carried out by the passenger, the foregoing extension may take a reasonable period of time. '

Article 13

Article 244 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states as follows:

" Article 244 When the preliminary investigation is necessary

Order for preliminary investigation, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 43 (1), is given only for plates falling within the jurisdiction of the trimming of a pleated court or having been operated by a person of particular legal order, where a jury has been preceded by a jury; The Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Union

Article 14

1. Paragraph 1 of Article 245 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 1. The preliminary investigation shall be summarized and, after the defendant has been called for at least forty-eight hours, shall be closed: (a) by direct call to the defendant to the court or (b) with a proposal from the Advocate-General to the Court of Justice, in accordance with Those laid down in the next paragraph, or (c) by the prosecutor's decision to the investigating magistrate, provided that a felony has been incurred. In the latter case, the preliminary investigation may be interrupted in the same way. '

2. Paragraph 2 of Article 245 of the Code of Penal Code shall be replaced by the following:

' 2. Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of

The referral of the accused person to the hearing. If there are more defendants and there are not sufficient evidence to be found at the expense of some of them, or to be declared inadmissible or to cease criminal prosecution, the prosecutor may break the case and insert it only as -to those in the court of justice. The Court of Justice shall also propose to the Court of Justice and when the Court of Justice of the Court of Appeals, to which the Court of Justice is brought before the Court of First Instance, concerning the persons of particular legal order, having regard to the tribunals of the Court of First Instance, considers that it does not apply to the Court of Justice. Information on the referral of the accused to the hearing and ordering the entry of the case to the competent judicial board. ';

3. The second subparagraph of Article 245 (3) is replaced by the following:

' The same may be done by the district attorney and if the action remains unknown after an inquiry referred to in Article 243 (2), first or first subparagraph, or an administrative inquiry or an administrative inquiry or audit report by the General Public Prosecutor. Inspection or Audit Office or Office for Inspection and Control of the institutions of the par. Article 1 (2) of the Law 3074/2002. '

Article 15

1. Paragraph 1 of Article 308 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 1. The end of the main investigation shall be declared by the Board of Governors. To that end, the documents shall be transmitted immediately after the final investigative act to the prosecutor, who, if he considers that he does not need to return them to the investigating officer in order to meet the investigation, within two months or, if the nature of the case It shall, within three months, submit a proposal to the Council to suspend or temporarily terminate the proceedings or to refer the case to the court or to prevent a charge against it. The crimes referred to in Article 1 of the Law 1608/1950, the termination of the main investigation shall be declared by the Council of Ministers. For this purpose, the case-file shall be transmitted immediately after the last investigative act to the prosecutor of seven years, who, if it considers that the investigation does not need to be completed within two months, or if the nature of the case warrants it within three months, Inserts it in a proposal to the Board of Appeals, which shall act by a qualified majority, whether or not to become a class or by issuing referendums, even for the relevant plaits or malformations, regardless of the gravity of the latter or e-if. That is why a different way of carrying out the investigation is envisaged and when the investigation of It considers that the substance of the case is not provided for in Article 1 of the Law. 1608/1950 crime. '

2. The last paragraph of Article 308 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

'The Board of Directors shall decide whether or not to continue the temporary detention and whether or not to maintain the restrictive conditions.'.

6

Article 16

Article 308 A is inserted after Article 308 of the Penal Code, as follows:

' Article 308 A Completion of the main interrogation exceptionally

1. Exceptionally, in the cases of felonies-of the laws 2 1 6 8/1 9 9 3, 2523/1997, 3386/2005, 2960/2001 and 3459/2006, of the forests and Articles 374 and 380 of the Penal Code, after the investigation has been carried out, the file is submitted by Advocate General F.G. delivered his Opinion at the sitting of the First Chamber on 6 February 2001, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Opinion, on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Finland on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of South Africa. Case C-52R Commission of the European Union ν Commission of the European Union

2. From the time that the prosecutor has drawn up the proposal in question, before he submits it to the President of the Court of Appeals, he has an obligation to inform the parties, whether or not by telephone, of the parties, if they have submitted a written request in writing. To take note of and exercise the right of hearing by submitting their views. A-10 days after the notification, for which a report is drawn up, the proposal of the Council of Appeals shall be forwarded to the President of the Committee of Appeals. Where the President of the Court of Appeals delivers an opinion on the referral of the case to the hearing, the Court of Appeal shall issue a Chamber of Appeals against the Court of First Instance.

3. In the event of disagreement between the President of the Court of Appeals or from the outset, the prosecutor takes the view that there is insufficient evidence, the prosecutor of the Court of Appeals shall read the case file to the Public Prosecutor, in order to be admitted to the Council. For the first time, the following:

4. In the case referred to in the second paragraph of this Article, the President of the Court of Appeals shall take a decision, against which there shall be no appeal, for the period of validity of the arrest warrant and for the maintenance or not of temporary detention or detention; A limited number of terms.

5. If there are more than one accused person, the Board of Appeal shall have jurisdiction to give a ruling on those who do not have sufficient information or to be declared inadmissible or to cease to be permanently or temporarily withdrawn. Criminal prosecution, so the case is divided. Also, the same Council is in any event responsible for deciding on the relevant crimes, whether it be one or more accused persons. '

Article 17

1. After Article 308 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 308 B is added as follows:

' Article 308 B Criminal conciliation

1. In cases where criminal proceedings are instituted for

Articles 375, 386, 386A, 390 and 404 of the Penal Code, the Prosecutor's Office, after the defendant's request, to the formal termination of the investigation, calls on the defendant and the patient to appear. Before or after their advocatesfor conciliation. The district attorney is required to appoint an advocate to the diress, which he does not have, from the relevant table of the club concerned.

2. The Advocate General shall prescribe a period of 15 days to the parties to the parties to the proceedings for the preparation of the conciliation procedure, attesting to the performance of the specific item or the full satisfaction of the person concerned.

3. If the conciliation record is drawn up before the defendant's apology, the inquiry shall be deemed to be terminated with respect to him and to the tenderers who accept it. If the record is drawn up after the defendant's apology, any measures imposed on the offence referred to in Article 282 shall compulsorily be lifted by a provision of the Public Prosecutor's Office.

4. If no conciliation is reached, the application shall be deemed to have never been submitted, destroyed with the relevant material and any copies thereof shall not be taken into account at any stage of the proceedings.

5. In the event of an attempt, the certificate of parafa 2 concerns the financial satisfaction of the pathologist due to moral damage. In cases of participation, the contribution of the agreed financial amount by a participant also benefits the rest. If one of the parties does not wish to deal with criminal transactions, the case is divided and followed by the ordinary procedure. The procedure referred to in this Article shall not extend to drawers that are not included in the offences referred to in paragraph 1.

6. Within five days of the drafting of the relevant report, the Prosecutor of the Court of First Instance shall transmit the case to the Prosecutor of the Court of Appeals, who shall immediately take the case to the Court of Appeal, by stealing the accused.

7. The court, taking into account the minutes of the conciliation, shall declare the accused guilty and impose on him, in accordance with Article 79 PK, a penalty not exceeding three years, unless, in a coherent manner, he considers that it should remain Across the world. Broad costs are not imposed.

8. The decision of the court does not fit in.

9. The conciliation shall not apply if the offences referred to in paragraph 1 are directed against the public, legal persons of public law and local authorities of a first and second degree. ';

2. At the end of the second paragraph of the first paragraph of Article 270, the words'or agreements shall apply to the application of Article 308b.'.

Article 18

1. Paragraph 1 of Article 309 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 1. The Council, within two months or, if the next paragraph is applied, within three months of the submission of the Advocate-General's proposal, may:

(a) to decide not to become a category;

7

(b) to cease criminal proceedings, (c) temporarily cease criminal proceedings, only

For the crimes of manslaughter with intent, robbery, extortion, theft (and rustling) and the embankment,

(d) order further questioning and (e) refer the defendant to the hearing

Of the competent court. ' 2. Paragraph 2 of Article 309 of the Penne Code;

The following is substituted for: " 2. The Council at the request of one of the parties

It is obliged to order the appearance of the Ombudsman before it in the presence and in the case of the angelist to give any clarification. In exceptional circumstances it may also permit the appearance of the party applicant before it. The Council may take the previous action and self-interest. In cases of felony, if the applicant does not have an advocate, his appearance is compulsorily ordered. However, when it orders the clarification of one of the parties or of its advocate, it shall invite the parties to hear and hear at the same time, as appropriate. If, after the end of the investigation and the submission of the documents to the public prosecutor, a party or any evidence which has a material influence on the Council's crisis has been brought to the attention of the public prosecutor, it shall be required to call upon it. The other parties or parties, to be informed and to make known their observations at reasonable time, which shall determine the same. ';

Article 19

1. The title of Article 315 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

' Article 315 Temporary detention and restrictive conditions'

2. Paragraph 1 of Article 315 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 1. If the defendant is temporarily detained or under restrictive conditions, the Council shall at the same time decide on his dismissal or continuation of his temporary detention, as well as for the maintenance or not of the validity of the restrictions. ';

3. Paragraph 3 of Article 315 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' 3. The Council, by referring the defendant to the hearing, shall, where appropriate, impose restrictive conditions or order the arrest and provisional detention, even if an arrest or provisional detention has not been issued. ';

Article 20

1. The title and Article 349 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be replaced by the following:

Article 349 Deferral of proceedings

1. The court, on a proposal from the prosecutor, or

And, of its own motion, it may only once again order a postponement of the proceedings for reasons of higher violence, but only one of the parties, one time, for serious health reasons or reasons of higher violence.

2. The postponement granted by a party to a party, for a reason relating to him or his counsel, may not exceed three months and is ordered only for serious health reasons, which are evidled by a medical institution, or reasons therefor. -Barely. These reasons are specified in the decision, which should be specific and subject to a causal relationship.

3. The court, before ordering the postponement, is required to investigate the possibility of terminating the proceedings for a maximum of 15 days, stating that it is not possible for the postponement to be replaced by a recess.

4. Second postponement may be given for the same reasons and in accordance with the upper conditions. Any other postponement shall be prohibited and the court may only order that the trial or the session be interrupted for a maximum of 15 days and up to two times.

5. The postponement shall be made in an express court, which shall be communicated by the court to the present parties, no witnesses and experts, and shall only be summoned by the claimants.

6. If the reason for postponement has been made by an advocate or another person on behalf of a party to an account and the debate has been postponed to an express court, the postponement of the decision shall have a position of bailiff.

7. The abstinence of lawyers is a reason for a higher force for postponement and is not included in the upper limits."

2. The title of Article 375 of the Code of Penal Code from 'Adjournment of the meetings' shall be replaced by 'Adjournment of meetings', points 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the same Article shall be renumed in 2, 3, 4 and 5 and shall be added. Paragraph 1, as follows:

' 1. In the case of triplets of felonies, special cases are laid down in particular for a month, in which only cases of accused persons or accused persons, and cases of tax felonies, are to be determined solely and only by accused persons. 12-1997, POINT In the Athens Court of Appeals, Piraeus and Thessaloniki, these special cases cannot be less than three months apart only for cases with temporary inmates and in any case for tax felonies. For the purposes of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall, in addition to the month of August. '.

Article 21

Article 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states as follows:

" Article 432 Suspension of revenge

1. If a person who has been referred to the hearing officer of the competent court for a hearing is unknown by means of the hearing, he shall not be arrested or arrested within a month of the performance of the referral.

8

In accordance with Article 156, the hearing of the Court of Appeal shall be suspended until such time as the accused person has been arrested or shown. This provision must be posted in accordance with Article 156 (2). The provisions of Article 113 PK to replace the limitation period of the claim shall be applied here.

2. If the person who has been referred for a hearing is or is deemed to be known by name, he shall be tried as if he were present, if he had been summoned.

3. The provision of paragraph 2 shall be applied analogous to the court which is competent to judge the appeal, if the person who was acquitted in a first degree for a masterpiece does not appear in order to be brought to a court appeal proceedings brought by the Advocate-General. In his conviction for a villain. ';

Article 22

The title and Article 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be replaced by the following:

" Article 435 Application for annulment of a felony procedure

1. If the defendant, who was convicted in accordance with Article 432 (2) and (3), by reasons of greater violence or other insurmountable causes, did not, in any way, disclose in any way to the Court an insurmountable impediment to the proceedings And to request the adjournment of the debate (Article 349), it may apply for annulment of the procedure carried out without its presence or representation by an advocate. The application shall be submitted to the Registrar of the Court which issued the decision in a subversive period of 15 days from its adoption and shall state the reasons for not-more violence or insurmountable impediment. A new application for a-ratification of the same procedure is unacceptable in any case and if it is supported.

2. This application shall not have the effect of staying enforcement of the judgment. It may be that the prosecutor of the court which issued the decision, as soon as the application for annulment is submitted, order the suspension of the application until the application is received. Where the suspension is not granted, the applicant may refer the matter to the court or, if it does not meet, in the judicial board within two days. The application for annulment is inserted, without being summoned by the person who submitted it, to the first instance of the court or tribunal which ordered it to act unsolicited. It is possible for the court to postpone the debate on the application to a more or lesser degree if there are grounds for higher violence or other insurmountable causes, owing to which the person who submitted the application cannot appear in the proceedings. Discussion of the request for cancellation. If the application is accepted, the decision shall be cancelled and the new discussion of the case may be ordered in an explicit case where the defendant is required to come forward without being summoned. The time-limit for appeal or the request for an appeal against the decision shall begin after the expiry of the period of validity of the appeal.

Or, in the event of an application for annulment, of an application for annulment. '.

Article 3

Paragraph 2 (2) of Article 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be replaced by the following:

An application for suspension of enforcement by the defendant shall be inadmissible unless two or more of the proceedings are rejected. '.

Article 24

1. Article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

' Article 477 Which is permitted

An appeal against the Court shall be allowed to the defendant and to the prosecutor, in the cases of the following Articles and to those who otherwise designate the law. '

2. Article 478 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

" Article 478 When allowed to the accused

The appeal shall only be allowed to the defendant against the counsel of the Board of Appeal, which shall refer him to the Judge-General for a hearing and only for reasons of:

A. .. Absolute nullity and b. The Committee of the European Parliament and the Committee of the European

'criminal law'. ' 3. Article 479 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Is hereby established as follows:

" Article 479 When allowed to the prosecutor

The Court of Justice may appeal to any of the members of the Board of Directors of the Board of Directors for a period of one month from its adoption (Article 306). This deadline and the appeal lodged shall not suspend the release of the defendant who has been ordered by the offence. '.

Article 25

1. The first paragraph of Article 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

' 1. The Advocate General may seek to appeal to the Court of Justice for an appeal to the Court of Justice for a declaration that, when it is referred to the defendant or by the Court of First Instance, it appears that it is not to be classified or ceases to be prosecuted or definitively or definitively rejected. Declare inadmissible. '

2. The third paragraph of Article 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

' 3. The Prosecutor of the Supreme Court may ask for -

9

To appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice and of the Court of First Instance of the European Court of Justice and the Court of Justice of the European Court of Justice. After that time, the Advocate General may appeal to the law and for any infringement of the provisions relating to prejudice without prejudice to the rights of the parties. '

Article 26

Paragraph 1 of Article 489 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

' 1. He who has been convicted and the prosecutor or public prosecutor has the right to appeal:

(a) against the decision of the Court of Justice and of the Court of Justice (Article 116), if the defendant has been sentenced to detention for more than twenty days or at a price of more than five hundred euros or in compensation or in financial satisfaction; Politically plaintiff over a hundred euros in total,

(b) against the decision of the Court of First Instance if the accused has been sentenced to more than three months in prison or in a financial penalty of more than one thousand euro or if it has been tried against him; EUR 50 in total or if convicted in any penalty involving the deprivation and impossibility set out in the next indent (point (c) or even if it involves the detention of another suspended prison sentence; And is greater than three months or involves the same results,

(c) against the decision of the tripartite pleadings and the decision of the Court of Appeal for plaice (Articles 111 (6) and (116)) if the accused has been sentenced to imprisonment for more than five months or in a financial penalty more than a thousand EUR-500 or any penalty resulting from deprivation of political rights or a discount from a public public or Community service or inability to appoint to it or to a penalty involving the establishment of another prison sentence. Suspended and is more than five months or involving the above withdrawal; and Incompetence or impairment and financial satisfaction to the citizen with a total of over EUR 500 in total;

(d) against the decision of the non-member and tripartite court of minors, which has been sentenced to be limited to a special detention facility for young people or who have been subjected to any corrective or therapeutic measures;

(e) against the decision of the non-member or tripartite child by which the minor who, at the time of the transaction, had completed the tenth of the year, was tried as a result of the completion of the eighteenth year of age; Was sentenced under Article 130 of the Penal Code to a custodial sentence,

(f) against the decision of the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice and of the Court of First Instance to which the accused has been sentenced to a custodial sentence;

Of a period of at least two years for a hearing or at least one year for members. ';

Article 27

Article 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states as follows:

" Article 497 Suspensive force of appeal

1. Anastomal effect is only the appeal that is admissible and not the deadline for its exercise.

2. In the case of a sentence of imprisonment up to three years imprisonment, the appeal has a self-justifying effect.

3. If a prison sentence is longer than three years, the appeal shall have suspensory effect, unless the court considers otherwise.

4. If the conviction was imposed on a temporary prison sentence, the judgment on whether the appeal has a-viscous effect belongs to the court which has been given. This, by means of a specific statement of reasons and applying the criteria referred to in paragraph 8 of this Article, shall decide immediately after the decision, either of its own motion or on a declaration by the defendant, that it will appeal.

5. The court may, in any event, impose restrictive conditions.

6. The provisions of the preceding paragraphs are applied and when an appeal has been made by the complainant in favour of the person convicted.

7. In the event that the defendant is sentenced to a judgment of the Court of First Instance in a custodial sentence and an appeal, which has no suspensory effect, the suspension may be requested by the Advocate General or the Advocate General. The appeal of the first judgment, pending the judgment of the Court of First Instance. The application shall be held in the appeal court and if it is a court of appeal and that does not affect the Court of Appeal. The defendant may impose restrictive conditions. If the application is rejected, a new application cannot be submitted before a month has elapsed since the publication of the decision which was rejected by the previous one.

8. Only then no inhibitory effect, referred to in paragraph 4 of the present sentence, may be applied to the appeal or a request for suspension of the application of the original decision, where it is justified that the final conditions are not sufficient and that the The defendant has no known and permanent residence in the country or has preparatory actions to make it easier to leave or in the past has been a fugitive or a fugitive or has been found guilty of a prison break or a violation of restrictions. If, by the addition of the above data, the purpose of the above data is to be used, a statement of reasons or a statement of reasons is justified. That if released is very likely, as it appears from previous convictions for criminal offences or specific characteristics of the act, to commit other crimes. The court shall in any event grant suspensive effect or suspension enforceable;

10

As, where justified, it considers that the direct exposure or continuation of the sentence will result in measurable and irreparable harm to him or his family. If the conditions laid down in the same court are violated, the Court of First Instance shall, at the request of the Court, decide whether or not to remove the performance of the performance granted.

9. The defendant shall be summoned, in accordance with Articles 155 to 161 and 166, to the court which is in accordance with paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Article. If it is kept from the court's seat, it shall not be attached to it.

10. For all incidentals of rights, discounts and incompetence, the suspensive effect shall always automatically arise. ';

Article 28

1. The first subparagraph of Article 322 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is replaced by the following:

' 3. The defendant, who has been summoned by a Chamber directly to the audience of the third party, in accordance with the provision of paragraph 6 of Article 111, shall have the right, after being informed of the case, to refer the matter to the competent council of seven years. Within the deadline set out in paragraph 1. '

2. The first paragraph of Article 499 of the Code of Penal Code is replaced by the following:

' Article 111 (1) 6, 112, par. Three, 113 par. 1 referred to in point (c) (c) and (c) and (1) (c) and (114) of Regulation (EEC) No 237/79 of the European Parliament and of the Court of Justice of the European Parliament and of the Court of Justice.

CHAPTER C AMENDMENTS TO LEGAL CRIMINAL LAWS

Article 29

The article on the n. 3625/2007 (ΦEK 290 1), as replaced by Article 7 of the Law. Regulation (EC) No 3727/2008 (EC) No 3727/2008 (EC) No 3727/2008 (EC) No 3727/2008 and subsequently amended by Article 29 (1) 2 of n. 3772/2009 (ΦEK 112 (1) is replaced by the following:

' In the case of the victims of acts which are subject to a degree of felony and are referred to in Articles 323A, 324 and 336 to 353 of the Criminal Code, the investigation shall be carried out as a matter of absolute priority and shall be concluded for the relevant pleas. The Committee of the Committee of the Committee of the European People 's

Article 30

Article 33 of the Law 3346/2005 (ΦEK 140 A) is replaced by:

' 1. For the purposes of applying Article 1 (1) of Article 1 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 86/1967, the amount of insurance contributions borne by the debtor (employers) is to exceed 20 000 (20 000).

2. For the purposes of applying Article 1 (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 86/1967, the amount of insurance contributions paid by employees to be deducted from EUR 10 000 (EUR 10 000) is required. '

Article 3

1. All in the form of a penalty payment of the Road Traffic Code, which was ratified by Article 1 of the Code. 2696/1999 (Fig. 57 (1)), with a reserve of up to six (6) months and up to three thousand (3 000) euro, with the exception of the transactions referred to in Article 34 (2). 12, 43 (2) (a), (b) and (4), 85 (85) 5 and 98 par. 2, which continue to be classified as 'plasters', with the penalties mentioned in the relevant provisions.

2. The infringements of Article 12 of the Law. 489/1976, as replaced by Article 17 of the Law. Regulation (EEC) No 2170/1993, which is to be applied for up to three years (EUR 3 000).

3. Infringes of the provisions of the Ministry of Education (FEK 275 B) and all violations of the provisions of all the Healthy Pensions carried out pursuant to Article 1 of Law 2520/1940 (FEK 273 A) or delegated to another In the case of the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States and the United States.

4. All breaches of the provisions of all the basic and presidential decrees, as well as of all ministerial decisions, which are based on criminal sanctions in the provisions of Article 3 of the Law. FR/1911, as encoded in a single text of 25 Aug/5 September 1920 (Fig. 200 B) or issued under the authority of n. FOLD/1911 or of the abovementioned code of royal decree, which are to be booked for up to three (3) months or to a maximum of three thousand (3,000) euro.

5. All infringements of the provisions of Law No 1037/1971 are to be applied for up to three thousand euros (3000) euro.

6. All infringements of the provisions of v.d. 748/1966 are to be applied for up to three thousand (3,000) euro.

7. All infringements of the provisions of the v. 2734/1999 on the basis of up to three thousand (3,000) euro.

8. All infringements of the provisions of the presidential provisions referred to in Article 12 (1) of the Law. 1481/1984, with a reservation of up to five (5) non-non-non-member countries and up to five thousand (5,000) euro.

9. The penalties or administrative penalties provided for in all the provisions referred to in paragraphs 1 to 8 shall remain valid and shall not be affected by the provisions of this Article.

CHAPTER D ' AMENDMENT OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT

JUDICIAL FUNCTIONS AND STATUS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES

Article 32

1. Paragraph 2 of Article 85 of the Law. 1756/1988 (ΦEK 35 (1) is replaced by the following:

' 2. The inspectors shall also draw up a special, detailed, reasoned report for each of their own constituents. The report assesses: (a) ethics, fortitude and printout; b) scientific training; (c) the crisis and the;

11

(d) the diligence, the diligence and the service (qualitative and quantitative) performance, e) the capacity for justice, the wording of the judgments and the address of the proceedings, and in particular for prosecutors The competent authorities in the defence of justice, both in the proceedings and in the hearing, and the ability to formulate proposals, the provisions they issue and the handling of the oral question; and The behaviour of the judiciary in general and in particular in the audience, as well as its public Performance!

The inspector shall also state whether he considers that the first trials and exchanges of first-party members who have completed five years to the extent, as well as the judges and prosecutors from the extent of the President's First Chamber and the Advocate-General are to be considered as such. First and above, after one year's contribution to the occupied territory. '

2. At the end of Article 84 (7). The following subparagraph is added to the following subparagraph:

' Inspectors, niggers and Advocates-General of the Supreme Court are obliged to check the decisions which have been taken by the courts in which the alleged judicial functions have been carried out and which are further determined by the Court of Justice. (i) a statement of disciplinary action. ';

CHAPTER ON FINAL AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS

Article 33 Transitional provision

1. Cases which have been referred to the Court of Justice until the publication of this court or tribunal shall be avenged by it, except in the cases referred to in Article 31, which shall be adopted in accordance with the new provisions, if The entry into force of the limitation period, the entry into force of the limitation period, shall, in practice, place them in the file.

2. Cases after the end of the main investigation have been submitted by the Public Prosecutor to the prosecutor of the Court of Appeals until the date of publication of the act, whether by the latter and the President of the Court of Appeals or from the agreement; Of the age of seven.

3. From the date of entry into force of this law, the detention shall cease in penal stores of persons who only pay legal costs or a financial penalty of up to three thousand euro.

4. The Prosecutor's Office for the execution of the sentence, applying the provisions of Article 82 (4) PK accordingly, orders the dismissal of those detained while the sentence has been served and sets a deadline of two to three years, In order to pay them the remainder of their sentence.

5. The tripartite court-martial of the place of execution of the sentence, pursuant to the provision of Article 82 PK, shall measure the sentence of those sentenced to prison sentences of two to three years, except in the case of a specific statement of reasons. The training of

Their punishment is necessary in order to prevent other offences committed.

6. The tripartite court-martial of the place of detention shall apply mutatis mutandis the provision of Article 105 (3) PK for all the convicts who have served one fifth prison sentence of more than three years.

7. The tripartite court-martial of the place of detention shall apply in accordance with Articles 99 (3). 1 and 100 PK for all sentenced persons to prison sentences, in so far as there was no prior conviction in a later sentence of more than one year's freedom with one or more decisions.

8. Directors of the penitentiary arrangements within 10 days of the publication of this law to the Public Prosecutor of the place of the place of the sentence of sentence of the sentences of the sentenced persons who satisfy the above (under the conditions laid down in paragraph 1). Paragraphs 5 to 7). The Advocate General shall enter the proceedings immediately in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 417 et seq. GDS, in the courts of paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of the Article, which decide within one month of the entry into force of this law.

9. They are not summoned to the court, they may submit a document by the Director of the detention facilities or to be represented by a lawyer.

10. Disciplinary penalties imposed on persons at the time of the entry into force of this law shall be deleted from the individual certificate of disciplinary action and shall not be taken into account for the granting of regular leave and dismissal under conditions, And the granting of other beneficial measures. Disciplinary penalties imposed for the disciplinary proceedings referred to in Article 68 (2) (b), (i) and (3) (b) of the Penal Code, and of the pre-existing provisions in the case of third parties shall be excluded. Paragraph 2 of the article only for the purposes of violence against members of the staff of the institution, in the case of the same paragraph, only those for the importation of narcotic drugs into the detention centre.

Article 34 Repealed provisions

From the entry into force of this law, the following shall apply:

(a) Article 16 of the Law (b) Articles 100a, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 379,

393, 395, 402, 404 (c) Articles 111 (2) and 384A of the Penal Code; 6, 245 paragraphs 4 and 5, 402

Second paragraph, 473 par. 1 last paragraph, 480 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

(d) the first and second subparagraphs of paragraph 1. I would like to thank the Commission for its support. NO 2307/1995

(e) the second and third subparagraphs of Article 17 (1) (b). 1756/1988, as added by Article 2 of the Law. (f) any other provision contrary to its arrangements

1.

12

CHAPTER IN THE OTHER PROVISIONS

Article 35

The deadlines for the submission of the supporting documents in par. Article 5 of the Law 3843/2010 (ΦEK 62 A) in the field of war services for the placing of immovable property in the provisions of the remaining premises of the same law extended until 28 February 2011.

Article 36

The first subparagraph of Article 1 (2) of the Law 3663/2008 (ΦEK 99 (1) is replaced by the following:

' 2. The term of office of the national member, which shall be seconded

At the seat of EUROJUST, it shall be four years, with a potential for equal renewal with the same procedure. ';

Article 37

The deadlines set out in Article 61 of the Law 3659/2008 (ΦEK 77 A) and the joint decisions of the Ministers of the Interior, Economy and Finance and Justice with No 4865/2009 (FEK 683 B) and 73434/2009 (ΦEK 1446 B), issued in accordance with its provisions, extend from their expiry One (1) even year. By joint decision of the Ministers for Economic Affairs, Justice, Transparency and Human Rights and Citizen Protection, the deadlines referred to in the preceding subparagraph may be extended to (1) a further year.

13

Article 38 Entry into force

The validity of this law shall commence from its publication in the Governing Council of the Government.

14

Athens, 2010

THE PRESIDENT OF PARLIAMENT

FILIPINO PEBBLE

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LEGISLATIVE WORK

ATHANASIOS D. PAPAIOANNOU, IMMORTALITY. THEODOROPOULOS