Advanced Search

Decision No. 2015-485 December 2, 2015 On A Call For Nominations For The Edition Of A Local Television Service Broadcast Unencrypted Terrestrially In High Definition In The Area Of Le Mans

Original Language Title: Décision n° 2015-485 du 2 décembre 2015 relative à un appel aux candidatures pour l'édition d'un service de télévision à vocation locale diffusé en clair par voie hertzienne terrestre en haute définition dans la zone du Mans

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Text information




JORF n ° 0292 of December 17, 2015
text #123



Decision No. 2015-485 dated December 2, 2015 on a call for applications for#039;edition d ' a local television service broadcast in the area of high definition by terrestrial radio in high definition Mans

NOR: CSAC1530576S ELI: Not available


Council Audio-visual superior,
Seen Law n ° 86-1067 of 30 September 1986 on freedom of communication, in particular its article 30-1;
In view of the decree of 24 December 2001, as amended inter alia The decree of 5 November 2015 on terrestrial digital terrestrial television setting out the characteristics of the signals emitted;
Having regard to Decision No 2003-299 of 10 June 2003 as amended and supplemented by Decision No. 2015-431 of 18 November 2015 Attributing to the national program company France Télévisions a resource Radio broadcasting for terrestrial terrestrial broadcasting in digital and high-definition mode of national television service known as France 3;
In view of Decision 2005-116 of 30 March 2005, as amended and supplemented by the decision N ° 2015-432 of November 18, 2015 attributing to the national programme company France Télévisions a radio resource for terrestrial over-the-air broadcasting in digital and high-definition mode of the television service France 4;
Given Decision No. 2007-501 of 24 July 2007 Amended to allow SAS Le Mans Television to use a radio resource for the full and simultaneous digital revival of the local terrestrial television service known as LMTV Sarthe ;
In view of Decision No. 2008-425 of 6 May 2008 as amended by Decision No. 2015-424 of 18 November 2015 attributing to the national programme company France Télévisions a radio resource for terrestrial terrestrial broadcasting in mode Digital and high definition of national television service France 2;
In view of Decision No 2010-408 of 11 May 2010 as amended and supplemented by Decision No. 2015-434 of 18 November 2015 attributing to the national programme company France Télévisions a radio resource for broadcasting by Terrestrial radio channel in digital and high definition mode of the television service named France Ô;
Given Decision No. 2015-24 of 21 January 2015 renewing the authorisation issued to the SAS Le Mans Télévision;
Seen the Decision n ° 2015-418 of 18 November 2015 supplemented by Decision No. 2015-453 of 2 December 2015, authorizing the Société de gestion du réseau R1 (GR1) to use a radio resource for the multiplexing of the programs of terrestrial terrestrial television service publishers in digital mode of the network R1;
Seen Defreeing n ° 2015-33 of November 18, 2015 of the Conseil supérieur de l' audiovisuel relative to the setting of rules for the sharing of radio resources for multiplex Terrestrial digital terrestrial television;
After Deliberate,
Decides:

Article 1


A call is made for applications for the use of a radio resource for broadcast And in the high definition, by terrestrial terrestrial television, of a local television service.
The geographical area covered by the call for applications is the area of Le Mans, as determined on the map shown in the Annex 1.


I. -Characteristics of the call to
I-1 applications. Context of the call


This call for applications is part of the evolution of the terrestrial digital television (DTT) broadcasting platform in metropolitan France linked to the generalization of the coding standard MPEG-4 scheduled for April 5, 2016.
The technological evolutions of MPEG-4 coders, combined with the performance of statistical multiplexing and the maintenance of a certain flexibility in the exchange of resources between the services of a multiplex, Are such that they allow the consolidation of five television services Broadcast in high definition within the same multiplex. For example, by deliberation n ° 2015-33 of November 18, 2015 ("thousandths"), the Conseil supérieur de l' audiovisuel has made an amendment to the rules for the sharing of the radio resource of terrestrial digital television. They anticipate that, as of April 5, 2016, the resource required for broadcasting in MPEG-4 of a standard definition television service (SD) will be 95 thousandths. The resource required to broadcast a high definition (HD) television service in MPEG-4 will be 195 thousandths.
By way of derogation, the resource required for the MPEG-4 broadcast of a metropolitan television service Local in high definition (HD), other than the service broadcast in Ile-de-France on the national network R1, will amount to 160 thousandths. Indeed, the diffusion of local stalls in France 3 as well as that of local television services on the national network R1 impose, outside of Ile-de-France, constraints on the multiplexing techniques used which Make the latter less effective than those implemented on the other national DTT multiplexes. These technical specificities lead to a resource of 160 thousandths of the local stalls in France 3 and local television services when they are broadcast in high definition on the national network R1.
Stopping the MPEG-2 and the generalization of the MPEG-4 compression standard for the distribution of TNT services will make available thousandths available. In particular, this resource will enable the conversion of existing local television services of an SD format to an HD format, in accordance with the objective set out in Article 30-1 of the Act of 30 September 1986 that the Higher Council of Audiovisual aids in the development of the various innovative television broadcasting standards.
The resource on which this call for applications is based will actually be available in April 2016.


I-2. The resource on which this call for applications is based


The call for applications is for the digital resource that will be available on the DTT R1 network on the Le Mans zone, following the transition to the compression standard MPEG-4 scheduled for April 5, 2016.
On this horizon and on this zone, the R1 network will allow the broadcasting of four national high definition television services, including France 3, as well as the local television service that has Already a clear and standard definition (SD) authorization on the field.
Due to technical constraints on the national network R1, and in particular the impossibility of implementing a full statistical multiplexing leading to the consumption of a specific additional resource on this network of 50 Thousandths of the flows related to the broadcasting of the national television service France 3, the resource available in this appeal is 65 thousandths.
This limited available resource allows the only access to high Definition (HD) of a local television service that already has a Authorisation in clear and standard definition (SD) on the zone, the authorisation in HD that is then intended to replace the authorisation in SD.
The authorised service must cover the geographical area of Le Mans referred to in Annex 1
The publisher of the authorized service shall distribute from all the sites and places of issue and the radio resources listed in Annex 1, respecting the technical characteristics which are defined in the Same appendix.


I-3. Service Categories


Due to the technical constraints mentioned above, only the application of the local authorized local television service in the Le Mans area can be presented for its high-definition broadcast.


I-4. Dissemination Standards


The technical characteristics of the broadcast signals must comply with the provisions of the amended December 24, 2001 Order.
In particular, the services must be broadcast according to the DVB-T standard on the basis of An encoding of the components according to the MPEG-4 standard.
They must also conform to the document entitled " Signage profile for the broadcasting of digital terrestrial television services and ultramarine " An electronic version is available on the Board's website (www.csa.fr).


I-5.
I-5.1 technical and programming characteristics. Technical Specifications


The video component consists of a number of rows equal to or greater than 1 080.


I-5.2.
I-5.2.1 programming characteristics. Local Programming


The publisher undertakes to resume the undertakings relating to the nature of the programming, in particular the characteristics of the local programming as contained in the agreement concluded with the Audio-Visual Higher Council.
First-broadcast local programs will be broadcast in high definition.


I-5.2.2. High Definition Programming


a) Definition of programs that are in real definition.
Are qualified as high definition programs:


-those whose images have benefited, from capture to broadcast, from a high definition resolution at least equal to that of the broadcast;
-those that are mostly realized, products and post-products in high definition A real and a minority of the elements made, products and post-products in standard definition, converted to high definition;
-among the works that benefited from an analog capture on a large silver film Sufficient (1), those whose loan-to-broadcast " Editor " Is in high definition (2).


The programs that have been converted to high definition by later digital processing ("upscaling") Are not considered to be high-definition programs.
b) Broadcast obligations in real high definition.
Eight hours of programming each day must be broadcast in full in real definition between 11 hours
However, the editor can broadcast standard broadcast programs, as long as it is:


-heritage works, that is to say:
-audiovisual works broadcast at least twenty years after their first operation by a television service;
-cinematographic works broadcast at least thirty years after their release in cinemas in France;
-broadcasts, That is, any dissemination of a standard definition programme which has already been broadcast on a television service falling within the competence of a Member State of the European Union;
-archives, that is, images, in particular Program extracts, the first release of which took place more than one year Before new use as part of a high definition program.


This high definition program delivery volume, between 11 a.m. and midnight, can be reached at the end of a supported increase ending on 31 December 2019. It cannot be less than two hours a day from 1 January 2018. The candidate brings all of the elements in support of his/her request for support.


I-6. Anti-concentration device


For the application of the anti-concentration device and in accordance with the 5 ° of section 41-3 of the aforementioned Act, a television service that serves a geographical area of which the enumerated population is More than 10 million inhabitants is regarded as a service of a national character.
The publisher must comply with the rules on nationality and media concentration as set out in Articles 39 and 40 (for Corporations) and 41, 41-1-1 (for corporations and associations) of the Act of September 30 1986 modified.


II. -General rules for
II-1 authorization procedure.
II-1.1 application folders. Filing


Application files must be submitted, in five copies, one copy in digital form, to the Conseil supérieur de l' audiovisuel, tower Mirabeau, 39-43, quai André-Citroën, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, before January 7, 2016 At 5 p.m., on pain of inadmissibility.
The files may also be sent to the council by post, no later than January 7, 2016 (the postmark being postmarked), under registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt.
The files must Be paginated and written in French.


II-1.2. Disclaimer


The candidate who wishes to withdraw his or her application must, without delay, notify him by registered mail with an acknowledgement of receipt by the Board, which takes note.
If the withdrawal is effected after the issuance of the Authorization, the intended resource for the service that is the subject of the disclaimer can only be assigned after a new call for applications.


II-1.3. Contents of the Candidator File


The application template is presented in Appendix 2.
After the filing deadline, any amendment to an application that would be considered substantial by the Advice would lead to the application being regarded as new and therefore inadmissible.


II-2. Admissibility of applications


The board establishes a list of eligible candidates.
Applications that meet all of the following conditions are acceptable:
1. File filing, in French, within the time limits set out in II.1.1;
2. The project corresponding to the subject of the call;
3. Effective existence of the candidate corporation on the application deadline.


II-3. Public Hearing


The Board hears candidates for public hearing.


II-4. Selection


As a result of the investigation of the applications, the Board, as a preparatory measure, makes a selection of candidates.
The list of selected candidates is published on the website


II-5. Elaboration of the amendment to the Convention


The Council shall define with the selected candidate the provisions of the amendment to the Convention provided for in Article 28 of the Law of 30 September 1986
Standard definition to which the same high definition service is substituted, these stipulations are the subject of an amendment to the existing convention.


II-6. Authorization or rejection of applications


In the case of a service that is already authorized in a standard definition to which the same high definition service is substituted, the Board makes a decision to amend the authorization and publishes it, with The amendment, in the Official Journal of the French Republic.
The criteria taken into consideration by the Council for the granting of authorisations are defined in Article 30-1 of the Act of 30 September 1986
Allowed rejection of their application.


II-7. Authorization Duration


For a service that is already authorized in a standard definition to which the same high definition service is substituted, the authorization term remains unchanged.


II-8. Commencement of emissions


The publisher of the licensed service is required to ensure the effective start of the emissions on the date and under the conditions set out in its authorization. Failing this, the Board may declare the authorisation lapse.

Article 2


This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the French Republic.

  • Appendix


    ANNEXES
    APPENDIX 1
    CHARACTERISTICS OF BROADCAST
    Description of the zone Call (Le Mans zone)


    SITE NAME

    ALTITUDE
    antenna

    (meters) [a]
    PAR MAXIMUM
    and minimum [b]
    CANAL/
    polarization

    BESSE-SUR-BRAYE

    Bonneveau

    146

    2 W (1)

    26 H

    THE MANS

    Mayet

    482

    79.4 kW (2)

    26 H

    LE MANS LA FORREST

    Forêterie

    198

    30 W (3)

    26 H

    PONCE-ON-LOIR

    Couture-sur-Aisle

    125

    6 W (4)

    26 H

    SEGRE

    Miochais

    93

    10 W (5)

    26 H

    SAINT-CALAIS

    The Current

    170

    400 mW (6)

    26 H

    VOUVRAY-SUR-LOIR

    Dissay-subcurve

    159

    10 W (7)

    26 H

    [a] The antenna altitude is more or less than 5 metres.
    [b] The maximum PAR is equal to the minimum PAR


    (1) Radiation limitation:


    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)

    0

    7

    90

    25

    180

    28

    270

    5

    10

    10

    100

    26

    190

    30

    280

    3

    20

    15

    110

    28

    200

    29

    290

    1

    30

    20

    120

    27

    210

    29

    300

    0

    40

    26

    130

    25

    220

    27

    310

    0

    50

    29

    140

    27

    230

    20

    320

    0

    60

    29

    150

    28

    240

    15

    330

    1

    70

    30

    160

    26

    250

    11

    340

    3

    80

    28

    170

    25

    260

    7

    350

    5

    (1) Attenuation to maximum PAR


    (2) Radiation limitation:


    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)

    0

    2

    90

    2

    180

    2

    270

    2

    10

    3

    100

    3

    190

    3

    280

    3

    20

    0

    110

    0

    200

    0

    290

    0

    30

    1

    120

    1

    210

    1

    300

    1

    40

    3

    130

    3

    220

    3

    310

    3

    50

    1

    140

    1

    230

    1

    320

    1

    60

    0

    150

    0

    240

    0

    330

    0

    70

    0

    160

    0

    250

    0

    340

    0

    80

    0

    170

    0

    260

    0

    350

    0

    (1) Attenuation to maximum PAR.


    (3) Radiation limitation:


    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)

    0

    25

    90

    0

    180

    25

    270

    28

    10

    25

    100

    0

    190

    30

    280

    25

    20

    23

    110

    1

    200

    30

    290

    30

    30

    17

    120

    2

    210

    24

    300

    30

    40

    13

    130

    4

    220

    25

    310

    30

    50

    9

    140

    7

    230

    26

    320

    27

    60

    5

    150

    11

    240

    25

    330

    25

    70

    3

    160

    16

    250

    25

    340

    23

    80

    1

    170

    22

    260

    28

    350

    24

    (1) Attenuation to maximum PAR


    (4) Radiation limitation:


    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)

    0

    4

    90

    6

    180

    16

    270

    3

    10

    4

    100

    8

    190

    20

    280

    2

    20

    3

    110

    11

    200

    29

    290

    1

    30

    1

    120

    16

    210

    26

    300

    0

    40

    0

    130

    20

    220

    20

    310

    0

    50

    0

    140

    23

    230

    14

    320

    2

    60

    1

    150

    25

    240

    10

    330

    3

    70

    2

    160

    20

    250

    7

    340

    4

    80

    4

    170

    16

    260

    5

    350

    4

    (1) Attenuation to maximum PAR.


    (5) Radiation limitation:


    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)

    0

    8

    90

    15

    180

    9

    270

    1

    10

    8

    100

    14

    190

    9

    280

    0

    20

    8

    110

    14

    200

    9

    290

    0

    30

    8

    120

    18

    210

    9

    300

    2

    40

    9

    130

    20

    220

    10

    310

    4

    50

    10

    140

    18

    230

    10

    320

    6

    60

    12

    150

    12

    240

    7

    330

    9

    70

    18

    160

    10

    250

    4

    340

    9

    80

    20

    170

    9

    260

    2

    350

    8

    (1) Attenuation to maximum PAR


    (6) Radiation limitation:


    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)

    0

    22

    90

    25

    180

    13

    270

    2

    10

    22

    100

    27

    190

    9

    280

    4

    20

    24

    110

    24

    200

    6

    290

    6

    30

    27

    120

    22

    210

    4

    300

    9

    40

    25

    130

    22

    220

    2

    310

    13

    50

    20

    140

    24

    230

    1

    320

    17

    60

    18

    150

    27

    240

    0

    330

    24

    70

    18

    160

    24

    250

    0

    340

    27

    80

    20

    170

    17

    260

    1

    350

    24

    (1) Attenuation to maximum PAR


    (7) Radiation limitation:


    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)
    AZIMUT
    (degrees)
    MITIGATION
    (DB) (1)

    0

    15

    90

    15

    180

    15

    270

    2

    10

    15

    100

    15

    190

    15

    280

    1

    20

    15

    110

    15

    200

    15

    290

    0

    30

    15

    120

    15

    210

    15

    300

    1

    40

    15

    130

    15

    220

    15

    310

    2

    50

    15

    140

    15

    230

    10

    320

    3

    60

    15

    150

    15

    240

    8

    330

    5

    70

    15

    160

    15

    250

    5

    340

    8

    80

    15

    170

    15

    260

    3

    350

    10

    (1) Attenuation with respect to the maximum PAR


    The CSA can later, if the development of the television networks so requires, substitute the Channels specified in other channels for receiving equivalent quality.


    Cover Map


    The map represents a theoretical estimate of the potential coverage of transmitters with technical characteristics Are listed above. The locations of the transmitters, represented by triangles on the map, are provided as an indication. The map can be downloaded from the website www.csa.fr, in the space reserved for the publication of this call, or can be consulted at the headquarters of the Conseil supérieur de l' audiovisuel, 39-43, quai André-Citroën, 75739 PARIS Cedex 15.
    This map Identifies the geographical areas on which it is estimated that the level of theoretical signal received will be a priori sufficient for the good reception of the service. Persons in these areas will normally be able to receive the channel if their receiving antenna is directed to the affected emitters. In addition, it should be recalled that this map is derived from a theoretical computer simulation. The reality on the ground may therefore vary from this theoretical estimate.



    You can view the image in the facsimile of the
    JOnº 0292 of 17/12/2015, text # 123


    Potentially covered population subject to orientation of the receiving antennas to the emission locations mentioned in the table above: 1 664 171 residents

  • Appendix


    SCHEDULE 2
    APPLICATION RECORD MODEL FOR TELEVISION SERVICES DISPOSAL DUE TO AUTHORIZATION FOR A DISSEMINATION BY HERTZIAN NEWFOUNDLAND AND SOLLIER A DISSEMINATION IN HAUTE DEFINITION IN SUBSTITUTION IN DEFINITION STANDARD DEFINITION


    I. -General description of the project


    The candidate briefly presents the service.


    II. -Candidate Corporation


    The candidate provides a Kbis extract of less than three months from the holding company and indicates the last known distribution of its capital as well as that of the legal persons controlling it.
    It provides Also a copy of the current company statuses.


    III. -Features of High Definition Programs


    High-definition programs are defined in section 1 of this decision.


    III-1. Actual High Definition Delivery Commitments


    First-broadcast local programs are broadcast in high real definition.
    The publisher agrees to broadcast in full, in real, eight hours of programs Per day, between 11 a.m. and midnight.
    This hourly volume can be reached at the end of a rampage that ends on December 31, 2019. It shall not be less than 2 hours per day as from 1 January 2018.
    For the purposes of calculating this obligation, no account shall be taken of the works of heritage, rebroadcasts and archives defined in paragraph I-5.2 of this Article. Decision.
    Do you want to benefit from a supported increase? Yes □ no □
    If yes, the candidate gives the Council the reasons why he wishes to benefit from this increase and brings all the elements in support of his request. In addition, it completes the following table:


    High-definition broadcast schedule volume (on average weekly)


    HORARY VOLUME
    PROGRAMS DISUSED
    in high definition between 11 a.m. and midnight
    NOTES

    YEAR 2016

    YEAR 2017

    YEAR 2018

    At least 2 hours

    YEAR 2019

    YEAR 2020

    At least 8 hours


    Of the programs it Intends to disseminate, the specific candidate, as an indication, The hourly volume of programs that will be broadcast in high definition.
    Share of High Definition Programs:


    EN VOLUME
    Hourly
    Programming
    CINEMA
    SPORT
    FICTION
    DOCUMENTARY


    INFORMATION
    MISCELLANEOUS
    OTHER

    YEAR 2016

    YEAR 2017

    YEAR 2018

    YEAR 2019

    YEAR 2020


    III-2. Spending on the production of high definition programs


    The candidate completes the table below for investments in high definition program production.


    AMOUNT GLOBAL CONSENTISE EXPENDITURES
    in the production of real HD programming
    EN K€

    YEAR 2016

    YEAR 2017

    YEAR 2018

    YEAR 2019

    YEAR 2020


    IV. -
    IV-1 business plan. Documents to be provided by the candidate


    The candidate presents the requested documents by distinguishing:


    -the financial information that relates to the preexisting digital terrestrial television activity (standard definition broadcast over the TNT network);
    -the financial information that relates specifically to the release The high definition service for its distribution on the TNT network;
    -finally, the financial information that relates to all other activities performed by the company.


    The following forecast documents are provided In euros:


    -forecast result accounts;
    -forecast investment details;
    -forecast and supporting funding plans;
    -forecast annual balance sheets.


    IV-2. Indicative form of tables to be provided


    The tables provided by the candidates will be based on the indicative form below. They are presented in French and according to French accounting standards. They are detailed over a period of at least five years. The fiscal years end on December 31 of each year. They must make it possible to distinguish, where appropriate, what is the only digital terrestrial television activity of the candidate company, the other activities of that company. The candidate distinguishes, to the extent possible, what is in the high definition.


    IV-2.1. Forecast result accounts


    (in K€)

    n-1

    n

    n + 1

    n + 2

    n +-3 (*)

    n + 4 (*)

    Last


    stopped

    Current
    Exercise
    (estimate)

    Previsional

    Previsional

    Previewing

    Previsional

    Private Sector Products

    Local advertising

    Extra-local ad

    Corporate Communication

    Telepurchasing

    Co-production

    Partnership

    Other

    Public Sector Products

    Objective and Medium Contracts

    Corporate Communication

    Benefit Agreement

    Partnership

    Co-production

    Others

    Stored Production

    Fixed Production

    Other operating grants

    Reserves

    Load Transfer

    Other products

    Total Operating Products

    merchandise purchase and variation

    Purchase and change inventory of raw materials and other supplies

    Other external purchases and charges

    including Program Purchase

    including Broadcast Cost
    Valign="middle "/>

    including TNT link cost

    including network link cost (Sat., ADSL, cable ...)
    Valign="middle "/>

    with TNT broadcast cost

    Taxes

    Salary and social charges

    Depreciation and provisioning

    Other charges

    Total Operating Expenses

    Operating result

    Financial Result

    Common result before tax

    Exceptional result
    Valign="middle " />

    Corporate Tax

    Exercise Result

    (*) Complete if candidate requests ascent


    N-1
    N
    N + 1
    N + 2
    N + 3 (*)
    N + 4 (*)

    Average Count

    (*) To be completed if the candidate is requesting support.


    IV-2.2.Forecast investment tables


    (K€)
    N (1)
    N + 1
    N + 2
    N + 3 (*)
    N + 4 (*)

    (1) n: 1st year of operation, possibly incomplete, of the high definition service on TNT.
    (*) To be completed if the candidate is requesting a ramp-up


    The candidate specifies the depreciation period.


    IV-2.3. Forecast Funding Table


    (K€)
    N1
    N + 1
    N + 2
    N + 3 (*)
    N + 4 (*)

    Net Result

    +

    depreciation charges

    +

    net provisioning allocations

    -

    Assignment value

    +

    Transfer Value

    =

    Self Financing Capacity


    (K€)
    N
    N + 1
    N + 2
    N + 3 (*)
    N + 4 (*)

    Non-HD investments

    HD-related investments (2)

    Change in need for funds from Rolling

    Debt Repayment

    Reimbursement of Current Accounts

    Total Requirements

    Capital Apport

    Current account

    New borrowings

    Product on Assignment of assets

    Working Capital Requirement Change

    Self-financing capacity

    Total resources

    Cash Flow

    Treasury Initial

    End Treasury

    (1) n = current fiscal year
    (2) Detailed
    (*) Complete if the candidate is requesting support


    V. -Technical Specifications


    Program delivery occurs in high definition using the MPEG-4 video coding standard.
    The technical characteristics of the broadcast signals must comply with the provisions of the order Of 24 December 2001 on digital terrestrial television setting out the characteristics of the signals emitted.
    In order to ensure a seamless implementation of its service with the other authorised services, the characteristics of the signals broadcast by The candidate must also comply with the document entitled " Signage profile for the broadcasting of digital terrestrial television services and ultramarine " An electronic version of which is available on the Council's website (www.csa.fr).
    The programmes broadcast must respect deliberation n ° 2011-29 of 19 July 2011 of the Conseil supérieur de l' audiovisuel on the technical characteristics of the sound intensity of television programmes and advertising messages.


    V-1. Technical and Financial Resources


    The candidate describes the technical and financial means that he or she plans to implement to ensure the operation of his or her service. In particular, it describes the estimated delivery costs, as contemplated.
    It also presents the technical solutions that it intends to implement to forward its signal to the emitters.


    V-2. Interactivity engine


    The candidate indicates, on the one hand, all the information, in particular the technical process, concerning the interactivity engine and, on the other hand, the means which it intends to implement to ensure a Compatibility of service with other authorized services.


    V-3. Use of the radio resource


    The candidate indicates his need for bandwidth to broadcast the service concerned (expressed in hundreds of kilobits per second), detailing the distribution of the flow for the video, Sound and associated data. Where appropriate, it presents its proposals on the technical requirements for multiplexing.


    V-4. Distribution of Terrestrial Hertzian Service
    V-4.1. Coverage


    The candidate agrees to cover the area described in Annex 1, in accordance with the technical conditions set out in this Annex.
    He is invited to indicate in his file the possible approaches Enterprises to guarantee the dissemination of its signal in high definition (technical studies, specifications, etc.). Extracts from these responses can be attached to the folder.


    IV-4.2. Operating the service


    The candidate specifies the time limits in which he can start high definition programming


Done at Paris, December 2, 2015.


For the Audio-Visual Higher Council:

The President,

Y. Schrameck

(1) See in particular Recommendation R132 and Technical Bulletin 3315 of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). (2) See in particular the technical recommendation " CST-RT-017-TV " The Higher Commission for Image and Sound (CST), the Federation of Audiovisual and Multimedia Content Industries (FICAM) and the HD FORUM.
Downloading the document in RTF (weight < 1MB) Excerpt from the authenticated Official Journal (format: pdf, weight: 0.95 MB)