The Law On The State Funds The Costs Of Evidence

Original Language Title: Laki valtion varoista maksettavista todistelukustannuksista

Read the untranslated law here:

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
Speaker of the Parliament in accordance with the decision of the Court article 1 of the Proof provided for in: (31 August 2012/494), at the invitation of the Prosecutor and of the Court of esitutkintaviranomaisen, or other than in a civil case by the order of the Court of todistajalla has the right to receive fair compensation from State resources for the necessary travel and subsistence costs, as well as financial loss. Todistajalla has the right to compensation provided for in this Act, even when he has been consulted on the telephone or video conferencing.

2 section (29.12.1988/1257), the Court may order the Prosecutor to pay compensation for the resources of the State in a criminal case looming in the party concerned, in accordance with the criteria provided for by law, subject to the rest of the kutsumalle the witness for the prosecution, if the proof is not necessary. The same may be compensation ordered to be paid by the owner of the suspect or witness in case the juge des Libertés kutsumalle. When a party has already paid compensation to the witness, he shall provide for compensation to be performed by the State. It does not, however, exceed the amount of compensation according to the law, the witness.

section 3 of the plaintiff and his legal representative, who has been ordered or called personally to appear before the Court in order to clarify the issue, is entitled to the same compensation as the todistajalla. Convicted as a reduction of the compensation must be taken into consideration for the determination of compensation for the costs of the recipient.

section 4 If the resources of the State, or in receipt of the allowance a witness the owner or his legal representative need to escort in order to arrive at the Court, will be in accordance with the criteria laid down in the law of compensation for saattajalle.

section 5 of the Income the cost of the necessary expenditure incurred by way of compensation is carried out for the trip.

section 6 of the Social cost of compensation is carried out daily, and great compensation.

section 7 (14.6.2013/439) as an economic loss, loss of income or other income shall be replaced by the, rightly, a nanny and a home-or complete alternates shall be reimbursed for salary and other compensation for material loss, which is caused by the arrival of a legitimate court.
The economic loss of a number of, and to be eligible to show in a credible way of losing.
At the end of the maximum amount of the compensation provided for in the financial loss of the State by means of a Council regulation.

section 8 of the President of the Court of Justice is the end of the interview, ask, does the witness, or other State resources within the meaning of this law, entitled to compensation. The case for the times at the end of the judgment of the Court should be a decision or for travel expenses, subsistence expenses, and compensation for financial loss. The advances carried out has to be taken into account as a deduction.

section 9 If the witness or other resources of the State entitled to compensation for travel and subsistence costs, as well as calls for financial loss compensation for more than the resources of the State may be granted, be it a party, which under this law to be sentenced to pay the costs of evidence for the State, at the same time, ordered to pay a reasonable thought out for more compensation.

section 10 (12.6.2015/743) the cost of compensation for the taking of evidence in the appeals court decision or judgment provided for in chapter 68 of the code in section 17.

L:lla 743/2015 modified section 10 shall enter into force on the 1.1.2016. The previous wording of section 10 of the change in the burden of proof, the cost is: on the decision of the Court or an appeal is sought by appealing to the chapter Chapter 17 in the manner laid down in article 42.

Advance payments to the Court of article 11 of the heart ' for the trip and other State resources to claim the right to receive compensation for the ' funds in advance of the referred to in article 5 of the travel costs. An advance payment may be carried out also for the social costs, when it the quality and is considered to be well founded in the circumstances entitled to compensation.
In the context of the call for the right to advance, and the procedure shall be informed in order to obtain it.

section 12 (31 August 2012/494) Advance to want to have the possibility to the Chief Officer of the police or the Police Department's Chief official, has ordered to deal with matters relating to the advance. In the context of the request must be accompanied by a report on the fact that the requester has been called to court for withholding tax, as well as, where appropriate, a statement shall be borne by the travel and subsistence costs.

section 13 of the application for an advance is immediately resolved by a decision, which should be placed on the travel and subsistence costs for the amount of the advance. The decision must, without delay, send to the information before the Court, where an advance payment received is to travel. Unless the decision is likely to have time to the posted information, is to grant the Court the withholding tax in addition to notify in time in some other way.

section 14 of the access to the decision on withholding tax should not be subject to appeal.

section 15 If the advance raised has not complied with the task for which the advance is granted, the Court shall order the advance be recovered from him back in so far as it has not been used to the costs referred to in article 11. It may be decided to advance the recipient without prior consultation.

Additional provisions of section 16 (in fact yielded a/697) requiring the defendant to carry out the State of its assets under this Act to be paid by the compensation provided for in the Criminal Procedure Act (689/1997), Chapter 9, section 1.

Article 17 When the prosecution or other claim shall be rejected as inadmissible, or lapses, the Court must consider whether the witness and the rest of the sentence of the person entitled to compensation in the amount of State funds for compensation, to the detriment of the State, or whether the owner be ordered to pay the State.

section 18 (July 22, 2011/819), the juge des Libertés matter, as well as criminal investigations (805/2011) in the case referred to in article 9, Chapter 7 of processing to the witness, the compensation paid will remain, to the detriment of the State. On the issue of extradition, the sums paid out as compensation will also, to the detriment of the State.

section 19 (14.6.2013/439) detailed rules concerning the reimbursement of travel expenses for the trip and travel costs, as well as the criteria for the calculation of the allowance is the amount of the daily allowance and accommodation is required, and the calculation shall be provided to the State by means of a Council regulation. The provisions of the regulation of the Council of State to the burden of proof on the practical costs and advance payments.

section 20 of This Act shall enter into force on 1 January 1973 and as compensation to witnesses shall be repealed on the date of October 28, 1938, from the resources of the State of the law (333/38) and on 21 March 1892 of Declaration of what is to be followed while performing the general resources of the compensation of witnesses in criminal cases.

The change of the date of entry into force and application of legal acts: law of 29.12.1988/12: This shall enter into force on 1 January 1989.
THEY 186/88, lvk. Mrs. 14/88, svk. Mrs. in fact yielded 217/88/697: this law shall enter into force on 1 October 1997.
THEY'RE 82/1995, LaVM/9, 1997/98, 1997 July 22, 2011, EV/822: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 2014.
THEY LaVM 44/222/2010, 2010, EV 374/2010 31 August 2012/494: this law shall enter into force on 1 January 2013.
THEY LaVM 6/30/2012, 2012, 2012 14.6.2013/61/439 EV: this law shall enter into force on 1 September 2013.
This Act is repealed on the cost of the resources of the State regulation of the taking of evidence (813/1972).
THEY LaVM 9/28/2013, 2013, EV 12.6.2015/65/13 743: this law shall enter into force on the 1 January 2016.
THEY'RE 46/19/2014 2014, LaVM, EV 274/2014