This regulation has been repealed L:lla 14.6.2013/439, which is valid for the 1.9.2013.
Presentation by the Minister of Justice on the State funds the costs of evidence on 15 September 1972 Act (666/72) on the basis of article 19, section 1 of the compensation amounts to the Court of the State of the funds to the witness, the owner of the saapuneelle, his legal representative, and you have to order them to run as compensation for travel and subsistence costs, as well as on the economic loss of the amounts set out in this regulation.
§ 2 the compensation shall be considered when determining the distance to start when it is entitled to compensation and to end at the time, left the residence after he arrived at the end of his employees without delay, or would have been able to arrive at the place of residence.
§ 3 When, on behalf of the public authorities entitled to compensation or for any other reason has been the free trip, he is to receive compensation of travel costs. If he has had to pay only a portion of the travel costs, is for him to be replaced, only some of them.
section 4 of the travel costs as a result of the cost of the fee corresponding to the provided to run from one place to another by the way and the cheapest way to travel in the lowest category. If the train on the way to having to use the sleeper ship on their way to a cabin or paid seats and seats, is also replaced by the extent of the payment.
More than just the shortest way and the cheapest mode of travel costs incurred for travel, if they are replaced by and bear the costs and the financial loss to the State of total compensation consists of the most profitable. However, as compensation for the travel expenses can be run up to the amount which the State officials carrying out the corresponding Mission in another travel class.
section 5 of the Social costs as a result of the commencement of each journey per diem to be paid to run the calculated per day, which in whole or in part is used for the journey (daily), and great compensation for each of the rest of the vehicle during the incident warranted a stay.
section 6 (30.4.1987/469) travel vuorokaudelta is the amount of State officials throughout the day, the amount of money and, if the travel time of day during the last up to 8 hours, flexible work.
section 7 (24.9.1982/714), Great compensation is carried out, which shows that he has paid in a credible manner entitled to compensation or to pay for the majoittumisestaan during the trip, up to a maximum of the option agreement.
section 8 (5 October 2000/839) as an economic loss, loss of income or other income shall be replaced by the, rightly, a nanny or home or complete alternates shall be reimbursed for the salary or other compensation to a legitimate material loss, which is caused by the arrival of the Court. The maximum amount of compensation for financial loss, however, is $ 350 per day.
The payment of compensation (on 22 November 2001/1070), section 9 (on 22 November 2001/1070) of the State funds to pay the cost of compensation for the taking of evidence shall be established by a court decision or a judgment.
Article 10 (on 22 November 2001/1070) the cost of compensation for the taking of evidence shall be paid by bank transfer or payment. The present proceedings before the Court, for special reasons, payment may be made in cash in cash.
Article 11 of the Request in order to obtain advance payments to the Court of the withholding tax to be done for the travel and subsistence costs may be made orally or in writing.
section 12 (on 22 November 2001/1070) for the payment of the advance shall be drawn up by the Ministry of Justice for a decision in accordance with the formula.
section 13 of the Song it is, and shall provide it to the Court, where an advance payment received is to travel, and the advance to the applicant one of the pieces being income tax authority.
section 14 (on 22 November 2001/1070) advance payment shall be made to the requester, or pay by bank transfer or, if prior is demonstrated by this way it would be available in time for the requester, in cash.
Article 15 of the withholding tax in connection with the execution of a payment received from the recipient to report from the obligation to carry out all or part of the back to the State in the event that the recipient fill in the role for which the advance was issued. He shall also lay down the detailed procedural instructions, in the event that, as a result of the task of the legal or other reason shall not be, or that the process will be terminated.
Additional provisions of section 16 (on 22 November 2001/1070) summons to the Court shall be drawn up in accordance with a formula to be determined by the Ministry of Justice.
section 17 (16.5.1985/394) section 17 is repealed by A 16.5.1985/394.
section 18 (22 November 2001/1070) in the case of taking of evidence by the Court to be paid by the costs of the compensation shall be reduced by the Court of appeal or if the amount of the advance payment by the Court to run in the back, the amount of the fee for a discount in accordance with the State of the vehicle or the advance payments to the simplified procedure applicable to the recovery.
section 19 (22 November 2001/1070) of the Ministry of Justice shall, if necessary, more specific guidance on the implementation of this regulation.
section 20 of This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 1973.
The change of the date of entry into force of the acts and application: 24.9.1982/714: This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 1982.
16.5.1985/394: This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 June 1985.
30.4.1987/469: This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 September 1987.
5 October 2000/839: This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2001.
on 22 November 2001/1070: This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2002.
Before the entry into force of this Regulation may be to take the measures needed to implement it.