Advanced Search

Ordinance On The Monitoring Of Surface Water, Groundwater And Protected Areas ' Mode And On Nature Monitoring Of International Nature Protection Areas

Original Language Title: Bekendtgørelse om overvågning af overfladevandets, grundvandets og beskyttede områders tilstand og om naturovervågning af internationale naturbeskyttelsesområder

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Table of Contents
Appendix 1 Monitoring of the ecological and chemical status of surface water and ecological potential
Appendix 2 Monitoring of groundwater quantitative and chemical status
Appendix 3 Evaluation of monitoring results and classification of the state of the water instance
Appendix 4 Groundskewn values for groundwater bodies

Publication on the monitoring of the state of surface water, groundwater and protected areas and the night-awakening of international nature protection areas 1)

Purline of section 22 (2). 3, in the environmental dimensions and in the case of water bodies and international natural protection areas (environmental target sloven), cf. Law Order no. 932 of 24. September 2009, section 8 and section 31 (1). Three, in the law. 1606 of 26. December 2013 on water planning, section 62, paragraph 1. 2, in the law of nature conservation, cf. Law Order no. 951 of 3. July, 2013, and paragraph 35, paragraph 1. 3, in the law of forests, cf. Law Order no. 678 of 14. June 2013, shall be determined in accordance with section 2 (2). 1, in the notice. 973 of 29. August 2014 on the execution of tasks and powers to the natural authority :

§ 1. This notice lays down rules for the preparation of monitoring programmes and the monitoring of the status of the irrigation bodies, international nature protection areas and protected areas, including the assessment and classification of the migration deposits ; mode.

§ 2. The National Services Board shall establish a surveillance network for water bodies and establish programmes for monitoring within each river basin district for each river basin period.

Paragraph 2. The monitoring of surface waters shall include the monitoring of the ecological and chemical status and the ecological potential in accordance with the specifications set out in Annex 1. The monitoring shall be the watchwords monitoring, cf. in Annex 1, Section 1, and operational monitoring, cf. Annex 1, Section 2.

Paragraph 3. The monitoring of groundwater shall include the monitoring of the quantitative and chemical status in accordance with the specifications set out in Appendix 2 ; the surveillance of the chemical state shall be a matter of control monitoring, cf. in Annex 2, Part B, section 2, and operational monitoring, cf. Annex 2, Part B, section 3.

Paragraph 4. Programs for the survey monitoring for surface water shall be prepared and carried out ;

1) where the reason for any overruns is unknown,

2) where the surveillance surveillance shows that environmental objectives laid down for a water area with home meal in section 7 (4) are laid down. 1, in the law on water planning, cannot be expected to be fulfilled and operational monitoring is not already established in order to identify the reasons for the fact that one or more water areas do not meet the environmental objectives ; or

3) to establish the magnitate and consequences of pollution.

Paragraph 5. Programmes for the surveillance of protected areas shall be supplemented by the monitoring as specified in Annex 1, Section 4, and Annex 2, Part B, Section 5, and as specified in the notice of bathing water and bathing areas and in the notice of water quality ; supervision of water-supply facilities.

Paragraph 6. The National Management Board shall adapt and modify the monitoring programmes if the monitoring or other data shows that environmental targets established for a surface water area or a body of groundwater in section 7 (2) are established. 1, in the law on water planning, cannot be expected to be fulfilled.

Paragraph 7. The National Management Board may amend the operational monitoring of surface water programmes during the period of the river basin period on the basis of the results of the basic assessment or monitoring, in particular with a view to reducing the monitoring frequency, if so, the impact in question is not significant or if the load in question has been removed.

§ 3. The Wildlife Board of Natural Management provides for the period 2015 to 2021 a supplementary programme for the monitoring of chemical status in the area of each river basin district.

Paragraph 2. The additional programme shall be fixed at the latest by 22. In December 2018 and cover the surveillance of substances no. In Part C, section 1 of Annex 2, the list of the environmental objectives for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water shall be 34 to 45 of the provisions of Part C of Part C.

§ 4. The Wildlife Board shall monitor in accordance with the specifications set out in Annex 1 (5), each substance in the observation list in the Annex to the European Commission ' s implementation decision C (2015) 1756 establishing a watchlist of substances for the purposes of the European Commission on EU-wide surveillance in water policy, in accordance with Directive 2008 /105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.

§ 5. In the context of the monitoring analyses and control of the condition of the natural state, in accordance with standardised methods as laid down in Annex 1, Section 5, for surface water and Annex 2, Part B, for groundwater and technical specifications as laid down ; in the notice of quality requirements for environmental measurement.

§ 6. The Wildlife Board shall fix thresholds for pollutants and pollutants in groundwater in accordance with the procedure set out in Part B of Annex 3.

Paragraph 2. The threshold values are shown in Appendix 4.

Paragraph 3. The nature management board changes the threshold values in Appendix 4 each time new information on contaminants, groups of pollutants or polluting indicators show that a threshold value should be set for another substance to be established that an existing one threshold values should be changed or that a threshold value previously deleted from the list must be re-examined in order to protect human health and the environment. The Wildlife Board may delete threshold values from the list when the groundwater body is no longer exposed to the risk of contaminants, groups of pollutants or polluting indicators to which the relevant threshold values concern.

§ 7. The Board of Natural Management assesses monitoring results and classifies the state of the water instance in accordance with specifications and procedures in Appendix 3.

§ 8. The Natural Management Board identifies any significant and sustained upward trends in concentrations of pollutants, groups of pollutants and pollutants in groundwater bodies or groups of ground water bodies, which : the basis of the basic analysis is characterized as endangered, in accordance with the specifications set out in Part C of Annex 3, Section 6. The steering controls shall determine the starting point to reverse the upward trend in accordance with Annex 3, Part C, section 7.

§ 9. In the case of international nature protection areas, the Environment Ministry shall monitor natural habitats and wild animal and plant species covered by the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and the Birds Protection Directive (79/409/EEC).

Paragraph 2. The monitoring of international nature protection areas must provide the following :

1) Information to highlight the conservation status of natural habitats and wild fauna and plant species covered by the Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC) and the Birds Protection Directive (79/409/EEC). The monitoring shall in particular take into account the natural habitats and species listed in Annex I and Annex II to the Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC) as priority.

2) Information that will enable the impact of conservation measures to be assessed on the conservation status of natural habitats and species.

3) Information to be used for the protection, management and exploitation of the species of bird species which in Denmark is covered by the Birds Protection Directive (79/409/EEC).

§ 10. The announcement will enter into force on the 14th. September 2015 and shall apply to the river basin period 2015 -2021, the Natura 2000 plan period 2015 to 2021 and the following schedule periods.

Paragraph 2. Publication no. 1399 of 15. December 2014 on the monitoring of the state of surface water, the status of groundwater and protected areas, and the suspension of night monitoring of international nature protection areas.

Paragraph 3. Publication no. 1434 of 6. In December 2009 on the monitoring of surface water, ground water, protected areas and on night monitoring in international nature protection areas, etc. with subsequent changes apply to 1. the period of water and the Natura 2000 plan for the period 2009-2015.

The NAB, the 9th. September 2015

Mads Leth-Petersen

-Thomas Bruun Jessen


Appendix 1

Monitoring of the ecological and chemical status of surface water and ecological potential

The monitoring network shall be designed in such a way that it provides a coherent and comprehensive overview of the ecological and chemical status of each river basin and allows for the classification of the waters of five classes in accordance with the provisions of the Community ; with the normative definitions set out in Annex 1 to the publication of the environmental objectives for watercourses, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water. The Consera Board shall draw up one or more maps showing the surface water monitoring network.

Parameters that are indicators of the condition of all relevant quality elements listed in Annex 3, Part A, section 1, are monitored. The selection of parameters for biological quality elements shall be identified by the appropriate taxonomic level necessary to obtain sufficient reliability and precision in the classification of the quality elements.

1. Testing of monitoring monitoring

1.1. Objective

The entro monitoring program must provide information with a view to

-WHAT? supplementing and validating the environmental impact assessment procedure in the base analysis,

-WHAT? the effective design of future monitoring programmes,

-WHAT? the assessment of long-term changes in natural conditions ; and

-WHAT? the assessment of long-term changes as a result of extensive human activity.

The results of this monitoring shall be reviewed and used in conjunction with the results of the basic analysis to lay down requirements for monitoring programmes in the river basin period 2015-2021 and the following periods.

1.2. Selection of monitoring points

Confidential monitoring shall be carried out on so many surface waters where an assessment of the general mode of surface waters may be given within each river basin or the main water-basin district of the river basin district. The monitoring must be carried out on

-WHAT? on points where the migration is significant in the area of the river basin district as a whole, including points at large stream of water, where the flow area is more than 2500 km ; 2 ,

-WHAT? on points where the water volume is significantly within the river basin district, including large lakes and reservoirs,

-WHAT? on points where significant waters cross the Danish-German border, and

-WHAT? in places designated by Council Decision 77 /795/EEC on the exchange of information, and in such other places where it is necessary to assess the impact of pollution carried over the Danish-German border and where, where appropriate, large quantities shall be carried out into the marine environment.

1.3. Selection of quality elements

Confidential monitoring shall be carried out for each surveillance site for a period of one year within the river basin period for the river basin period,

-WHAT? parameters that are indicators for all biological quality elements,

-WHAT? parameters that are indicators of all hydromorphological quality elements,

-WHAT? parameters that are indicators for all general physico-chemical quality elements,

-WHAT? priority substances emitted in the river basin or the country of the country, and

-WHAT? other pollutants emitted in significant quantities in the river basin or the part-country,

unless the previous surveillance surveillance has shown that the water area in question has reached a good condition and the basic analysis has shown that the effects of the area were not affected. In such cases, inspection monitoring shall be carried out once for each third river basin management plan.

2. Operational monitoring design

2.1. Objective

The operational monitoring shall make it possible

-WHAT? to establish the state of the waters deemed to be at risk of not being able to meet the target of good surface water or, artificial and heavily modified waters, good ecological potential and good chemical status ; surface waters at the end of the planned period following the last basic analysis ; and

-WHAT? to assess the state changes to these waters as a result of the programmes of action.

2.2. Selection of monitoring points

The operational monitoring shall be carried out in the case of all water areas which, based on the results of the basic analysis or surveillance monitoring, are considered to be at risk of not being able to fulfil the target of good surface water conditions or, for artificial and strong, modified waters, good ecological potential and good chemical status for surface waters at the end of the planned period for the base analysis and for water areas in which priority substances are derived. For the priority substances, the monitoring points shall be selected in accordance with EU law, provided that it lays down specific rules on the monitoring points for priority substances. In all other cases, including in the case of priority substances, when there are no specific rules in EU law, the monitoring points shall be selected as follows :

-WHAT? In the case of water areas resulting from significant point source workloads, risk of not being able to meet the target of good surface water or, artificial and heavily modified waters, good ecological potential and good chemical status for surface waters at the end of the planned period for the base analysis shall be so many monitoring points within each aquatic area that it is possible to assess the scope and impact of the point source pressures. Where a water area is subject to a number of point source workloads, the monitoring points may be selected in such a way as to assess the extent and impact of these loads.

-WHAT? In the case of water areas resulting from significant diffuse loads, in the risk of not being able to fulfil the target of good surface water mode or, artificial and heavily modified waters, good ecological potential and good chemical status for surface waters at the end of the planned period for the base analysis shall be so many monitoring points within selected areas of water that it is possible to assess the scale and impact of the diffuse load pressures. The selection of water areas shall be carried out in such a way as to be representative of the relative risks of the occurrence of the diffuse loads and for the relative risks of a lack of good status for surface water.

-WHAT? In the case of water areas resulting from significant hydromorphological loads, risk not being able to meet the target of good surface water or, artificial and heavily modified waters, good ecological potential and good chemical status ; in the case of surface waters at the end of the planned period following the base analysis, there shall be so many monitoring points in selected areas of water that it is possible to assess the scale and impact of hydromorphological pressures. The areas of water selected shall be indicators of the overall impact of the hydromorphological load which all the waters are exposed to.

2.3. Selection of quality elements

In order to assess the extent of the load the surface water areas are exposed, the quality elements that are indicators for the stresses, water or water areas shall be subject to the evaluation of the quality elements. In order to assess the impact of these loads, the following shall be subject to the following relevance :

-WHAT? parameters that are indicators of the biological quality element (s) which are most sensitive to the pressures to which the water areas are exposed ;

-WHAT? all the priority substances emitted and other pollutants emitted in significant quantities, and

-WHAT? parameters that are indicators of the hydromorphological quality element that is most sensitive to the identified load.

2.4. Monitoring in the acute exposure of priority substances and certain other pollutants

Where, by measured or estimated concentrations in the environment or emissions, a possible risk to the aquatic environment or via the aquatic environment has been identified from acute exposure to priority substances and certain other pollutants referred to in Part C, Section 1 of Annex 2 of the Emission for the Emission of Water, Sea, Transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water, and an environmental quality requirement for sediment or biota, cf. Part C, section 2, of that Annex, shall also be monitored in surface water.

3. Monitor Frequency

3.1. Monitoring in water

For parameters that are indicators of physico-chemical quality elements, inspection monitoring shall be carried out within the one-year inspection period at intervals not longer than those specified in Table 1 below, unless greater ranges are justified on the basis of technical knowledge and expert assessments. In the case of biological or hydromorphological quality elements, the monitoring shall be carried out at least once during the surveillance monitoring period.

For operational monitoring, the frequency of the monitoring necessary for each parameter shall be determined in such a way as to provide sufficient data for a reliable assessment of the condition of the relevant quality. Monitoring should take place with intervals not longer than those listed in Table 1 below, unless larger intervals will be justified on the basis of technical knowledge and expert assessments.

The frequency of monitoring frequencies shall be determined in a manner that guarantees an acceptable level of reliability and precision. The frequencies must take account of the variability of the parameters resulting from both natural and human conditions. The dates on which monitoring is carried out shall be chosen in such a way as to minimise the impact of the seasons in the results and ensure that the results reflect changes in the water area caused by changes resulting from human activity ; loads. Additional surveillance on different seasons within the same year shall be carried out in order to achieve this objective.

Table 1. Surveillance ranges for biological, hydromorphological and physico-chemical quality elements.

Quality elements
Water Run
Searching
Transitional waters
Coastal waters
Biological
Fytoplankton
6 months
6 months
6 months
6 months
Other aquatic flora
3 Years
3 Years
3 Years
3 Years
Makroinvertebrates
3 Years
3 Years
3 Years
3 Years
Fish
3 Years
3 Years
3 Years
Hydromorphological
Continuity
6 years
Hydrology
Continuous
1 month
Morphology
6 years
6 years
6 years
6 years
Physico-Chemical
Thermal conditions
3 months
3 months
3 months
3 months
Oxyration
3 months
3 months
3 months
3 months
Salinity
3 months
3 months
3 months
Near-nutrient mode
3 months
3 months
3 months
3 months
Asurging mode
3 months
3 months
Pollutants other than priority substances
3 months
3 months
3 months
3 months
Prioritized substances
1 month
1 month
1 month
1 month

3.2. Monitoring of priority substances and certain other pollutants in the sediment and biota

For the priority substances and certain other pollutants in respect of which an environmental quality requirement for sediment or biota is used, the substance is monitored in the relevant Matrix as defined in section 2, nr. 1, in the notice of the establishment of environmental targets for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water at least once a year, unless technical knowledge and expert evaluations are undergrinning another interval.

For priority substances that tend to be accumulated in sediments and biota, including special matter No 2, 5, 6, 7, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21, 26, 28, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 43 and 44 referred to in Part C, section 1 of Annex 2 to the publication of the environmental objectives for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water ; the monitoring frequency of sediment and biota in such a way as to provide sufficient data for a reliable analysis of the long-term development trends. Monitoring shall be carried out every three years, unless technical knowledge and expert evaluations are undergracing a different interval.

3.3. Minor intensive monitoring of certain priority substances

For substance no. 5, 21, 28, 30, 35, 37, 43 and 44 referred to in Part C, Section 1 of Annex 2 to the publication of the environmental objectives for water flows, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water may be carried out in less intensive surveillance than in section 3.1 and in section 3.2, first period, provided that the monitoring is representative and that a statistical robust baseline for the presence of the substances in question in the aquatic environment is available. In accordance with section 3.2, the last sentence, monitoring shall be carried out every three years, unless technical knowledge and expert evaluations are carried out in a different interval.

4. Additional monitoring requirements for protected areas

The programmes for monitoring the ecological and chemical status of surface water shall be complemented in order to meet the following requirements :

4.1. Scalte waters

For surface water areas designated as protected shellfish waters, cf. Section 18 (2). 3, in the law of water planning, samples shall be taken at intervals not longer than those specified in Table 2 below. If, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Annex 3, Part C of the Office, it is determined that the quality of the designated water is significantly better than the quality requirements laid down in Annexes 1 and 2 to the announcement of the quality requirements for shellfish waters may be : frequency shall be reduced by sampling. Where there is no contamination or risk of the quality of the water, the Board of Natural may decide that the sampling is unnecessary.

If, in the case of sampling, it appears that there are any derogations from the quality requirements laid down, the FDA shall examine whether this is caused by a natural phenomenon or whether it is caused by contamination, and shall take appropriate measures ; measures.

The exact sampling point, the distance from here to the nearest point, from which pollutants are charged and the depth in which the samples are to be taken, shall be determined by the National Agency, having regard, in particular, to local environmental conditions.

The reference methods for the calculation of the parameters in question are specified in Table 2. Laboratories using other methods must ensure that the results obtained are similar to or comparable with the results obtained in Table 2 methods.

Table 2. Sampling ranges and reference analysis methods for shellfish waters.

Parameters
Range
Reference method of analysis
pH (in water),
3 months
Electrometrical measurement. The measurement is performed in situ at the same time as sampling
Temperature (in water)
3 months
Thermometry. The measurement is performed in situ at the same time as sampling
Colour (in water)
3 months
Filtering on membrane filter (0,45 μm). Photometric method of platinum coupling unit
Ingenized substance (in water)
3 months
Filtering on membrane filter (0,45 μm), drying at 105 ° C and weighing. Centrifugation (at least 5 min., average acceleration 2800-3200 g), drying at 105 ° C and weighing
Salinity (in water)
1 month
Measurement of the electrical conductivity
Oxyration (in water)
1 month
Winkler method electrochemical method
Oil (in water)
3 months
Visual Survey
Organic halogen compounds
(in shellfish) 1
6 months
Chromatography in the air phase after extraction with appropriate solvents and purification
Metals (Ag, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Cr, Cr, 9, Pb, Zn)
6 months
Atomic absorption spectrometry, where appropriate, after concentration and / or extraction,
Subtradient substances
(in shellfish) 1
Taste-examination of seafood when there is a request for such a substance
Escherichia coli
(in shellfish) 1
3 months
DS / ISO/TS 16649-3 1. Publibe 2005-10-24. Microbiological examination of food and feed

1 Scales = blue mussels ( Mytilus edulis ).

4.2. Nutient Areas

In the case of surface water pollution caused or generated by nitrates covered by the Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC), an appropriate monitoring programme shall be drawn up and carried out in order to assess the effectiveness of the national system ; action programme. In the case of the whole national territory, the nitrate levels of surface water must be monitored at selected measuring sites, which make it possible to determine the extent of the nitrate pollution in the water arising from agricultural activities.

In the case of surface water bodies to which waste water is discharged with the content of nutrients and organic substances covered by the urban waste water directive (91/271/EEC), checks shall be carried out with the water areas receiving waste water discharge and direct emissions in cases where it can be expected that the aquatic environment may be affected substantially. The supplementary monitoring programme must follow the rules governing operational surveillance in section 2.

4.3. Habitat and species protection areas

Water areas designated as habitat or species protection areas shall be covered by the operational monitoring programme, in accordance with the provisions of the operational monitoring programme. in paragraph 2 where they are considered to be in danger of not being able to meet the target of good surface water or, artificial and heavily modified waters, good ecological potential and good monitoring surveillance as being at risk of not being able to meet the target of good surface water mode or, good-ecological potential and good ; chemical state of surface water at the end of the planned period after the base analysis. Monitoring shall be carried out with a view to assessing the extent and impact of all relevant significant loads of these waters and, where necessary, to assess changes in the state of the water area as a result of the programmes of action. Monitoring must continue until the areas meet the water-related requirements of the law in accordance with which they have been designated and the objectives set out in section 7 (3). 2, no. Two, in the law of water planning.

5. Additional monitoring requirements for substances on observation list

Each substance in the observation list in the Annex to the European Commission ' s implementation decision C (2015) 1756 establishing a Watchlist of substances for the purposes of EU-wide monitoring of water policy, in accordance with the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008 /105/EC is monitored by selected representative monitoring points over a period of not less than 12 months. For the substances in the first watchlist, the monitoring period shall start at the latest at the 20. September 2015. For each substance on subsequent lists, surveillance shall be initiated within 6 months of the inclusion of the substance on the list.

Each substance on the watchlist shall be monitored for at least 4 1) representative monitoring points. For each substance, the selection of monitoring points, monitoring frequency and monitoring times for each substance shall be taken into account for the substance and its possible occurrence. The frequency of the monitoring frequency shall be at least once a year.

Where, from existing monitoring programmes or surveys, adequate, comparable, representative and more recent monitoring data for a particular substance in the watchlist may be available for the supplementary supervision, the condition that the substance has also been monitored in the application of a method which satisfies the technical guidelines drawn up by the European Commission in accordance with Article 8b (1). 5, in Directive on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy (2008/105/EC).

6. Standards for the monitoring of quality elements

The methods used for monitoring type parameters must comply with the international standards listed below, or other national or international standards which ensure the data of equivalent scientific quality ; and comparability.

Sampling of macro-invertebrates :

-WHAT? ISO 5557-3 : 1995

-WHAT? A 27828 : 1994

-WHAT? A 28265 : 1994

-WHAT? AN ISO 9391 : 1995

-WHAT? AN ISO 8689-1 : 1999

-WHAT? AN ISO 8689-2 : 1999

Sampling of macrophytes : Relevant CEN/ISO standards when they are produced.

Sampling of fish : Relevant CEN/ISO standards when they are produced.

Sampling of macrophytes : Relevant CEN/ISO standards when they are produced.

Sampling of kielalgae : Relevant CEN/ISO standards when they are produced.

Standards for physico-chemical parameters : All relevant CEN/ISO standards.

Standards for hydromorphological parameters : All relevant CEN/ISO standards.


Appendix 2

Monitoring of groundwater quantitative and chemical status

Part A. Quantitative State Monitoring

Monitoring shall include changes to the groundwater status as an indicator of the quantitative status of the groundwater.

1. Watchnet

The monitoring network for the monitoring of the quantitative status of groundwater shall be designed in such a way as to provide a reliable assessment of the quantitative status of all groundwater bodies or groups of groundwater bodies, including the assessment of the body ; available groundwater resource. The Wildlife Board shall draw up one or more maps showing the groundwater surveillance network.

2. Monitoring persistness

The network shall include a sufficient number of representative surveillance sites to be able to form a estimation of the groundwater level of the individual groundwater body or group of groundwater bodies taking account of maps-and long-term variations in the formation of the groundwater, and in particular to ensure that :

-WHAT? that the surveillance sites of groundwater bodies deemed to be at risk of not being able to fulfil the objective of good groundwater status at the end of the planned period after the last basic analysis are sufficiently close to : the impact of inges and the impact of the flow of the groundwater body can be assessed, and

-WHAT? that, for groundwater bodies, where ground water flows over the Danish-German border, there is sufficient number of monitoring points to assess the flow of groundwater flow and water over the limit.

3. Monitor Frequency

The frequency of monitoring shall allow the quantitative status of each groundwater body or group of groundwater bodies to assess the quantitative status of each groundwater body, taking into account short and long-term variations in the formation of groundwater. In particular, it shall ensure

-WHAT? that, for groundwater bodies, which are considered to be at risk of not being able to fulfil the objective of good groundwater status at the end of the period of expiry of the last basic analysis, the measurement shall be measured with sufficient frequency to ensure that the ingest ingers and the impact of the flow of the groundwater body can be assessed, and

-WHAT? that groundwater bodies, where groundwater flows above the Danish-German border, are often measured in sufficient frequency to assess the flow of groundwater flow and water over the limit.

Part B. Chemical State Monitoring

Monitoring shall include conductivity and concentrations of pollutants as indicators of the chemical status of groundwater.

Monitoring and analytical methods are used, which comply with international quality control principles, including, where appropriate, CEN methods or national standardised methods ensuring equivalent scientific quality and comparability of the data produced.

1. Watchnet

The monitoring network for the monitoring of chemical status is so designed that it provides a coherent and comprehensive view of the chemical status of groundwater in each river basin, so that long-term anthropogenic trends are to be carried out ; the presence of the incidence of pollutants may be recorded, cf. Paragraph 4.

2. Confidential monitoring

2.1. Objective

Confidential monitoring shall be carried out in :

-WHAT? supplementing and validating the procedure for the environmental assessment ; and

-WHAT? to provide information for the assessment of the long-term development trends, both as a result of changes in natural conditions and because of human activity.

2.2. Selection of monitoring points

A sufficient number of surveillance sites are selected for each of the following types of groundwater :

-WHAT? occurrences which, on the basis of the basic analysis, are considered to be in the risk of not being able to fulfil the objective of good groundwater status at the end of the planned period for the base analysis ; and

-WHAT? instances that cross the Danish-German border.

2.3. Selection of parameters

In each of the selected groundwater bodies, cf. in 2.2, the following sets of key parameters are monitored :

-WHAT? oxygen content

-WHAT? pH value

-WHAT? conductivity,

-WHAT? nitrate

-WHAT? Ammonium.

In addition, for instance where the basic analysis has been established a significant risk that they will not be able to achieve good conditions, the parameters that show the impact of the workloads.

In addition, for transboundary occurrences, the parameters that are relevant for the protection of all usages which are made of the groundwater flow are monitored.

3. Operational monitoring

3.1. Objective

Operational monitoring shall be carried out in the periods between the surveillance monitoring programmes,

-WHAT? to establish the chemical status of all groundwater bodies or groups of groundwater bodies deemed to be at risk of not being able to fulfil the objective of good groundwater status at the end of the planned period during the last year ; basic analysis, and

-WHAT? to establish whether there is a man-made long-term trend in the concentration of any of the pollutants.

3.2. Selection of monitoring points

Operational monitoring shall be carried out for all the groundwater bodies or groups of groundwater bodies based on both the base analysis and control monitoring shall be considered to be in the risk of not being able to fulfil the target of good ; groundwater status at the end of the planned period after the base analysis. The selection of surveillance sites shall also reflect an assessment of the representative monitoring data from the site in question concerned with the quality of the groundwater body or groundwater body.

3.3. Monitor Frequency

Operational monitoring of the periods between control monitoring programmes shall be carried out with sufficient frequency to ensure that the effects of the relevant workloads can be recorded and at least once a year.

4. Requirements for monitoring identification of essential and continuous upward trends

Programmes to monitor the chemical status of groundwater must be able to identify essential and sustained upward trends in concentrations of pollutants resulting from human activity, and must be able to demonstrate the reversal of such substances ; upward trends. To this end, the monitoring frequencies and surveillance sites sufficient for :

-WHAT? to provide the necessary information to ensure that such upward trends can be distinguished from natural variation, with sufficient reliability and precision ;

-WHAT? to permit identification of such upward trends in such time as to enable measures to be carried out in order to prevent or at least, as far as practicable, reduce environmental significant deterioration of the environment ; the quality of groundwater ; the identification of upward trends taking account of the existing data in connection with reporting every six years as part of the river basin management plan ;

-WHAT? permit the detection of the phrase as a result of the intervention programmes of such upward trends ; and

-WHAT? to incorporate the physical and chemical time characteristics of the groundwater body, including groundwater flow conditions, ground water formation and percolationtime through the soil or subsoil.

5. Requirements for the monitoring of groundwater polluted by nitrates originating from agriculture

In the case of areas of water pollution caused or developed by nitrates covered by the Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC), an appropriate monitoring programme shall be carried out in order to assess the effectiveness of the national action programme. In the case of the whole national territory, the nitrate levels of groundwater must be monitored at selected measuring sites, which make it possible to determine the extent of the nitrate pollution in the water arising from agricultural activities.


Appendix 3

Evaluation of monitoring results and classification of the state of the water instance

Part A. Monitoring systems for surface water

1. Quality elements for the classification of ecological status

1.1. Water Run

Biological elements

-WHAT? Composition and densities of aquatic flora

-WHAT? Composition and density of the bentic invertebratine

-WHAT? Composition, densities and age structure of fish fauna

Hydromorphological elements that support the biological elements

-Hydrological regime

-the volume and dynamism of the water flow

-connection to groundwater bodies

-The continuity of the water.

-Morphological conditions.

-variation in the depth and breadth of the river

-bottom conditions (structure and substrate)

-The structure of the broad zone

Chemical and physico-chemical elements supporting the biological elements

General

-WHAT? Thermal conditions

-WHAT? Oxytic conditions

-WHAT? Salinity

-WHAT? Asurging mode

-WHAT? Near-nutrient conditions

Specific pollutants

-WHAT? Pollution of all priority substances which have been identified in the water area

-WHAT? Pollution with other substances which have been identified in significant quantities in the aquatic area ;

1.2. Searching

Biological elements

-WHAT? Composition, density and biomass of the phytoplankton

-WHAT? Composition and density of other aquatic flora

-WHAT? Composition and density of the bentic invertebratine

-WHAT? Composition, densities and age structure of fish fauna

Hydromorphological elements that support the biological elements

-Hydrological regime

-the volume and dynamism of the water flow

-residency time

-connection to groundwater bodies

-Morphological conditions.

-variation in the depth of the search

-the volume and structure of the bottom (structure and substrate)

-The structure of the lake.

Chemical and physico-chemical elements supporting the biological elements

General

-WHAT? Page Depth

-WHAT? Thermal conditions

-WHAT? Oxytic conditions

-WHAT? Salinity

-WHAT? Asurging mode

-WHAT? Near-nutrient conditions

Specific pollutants

-WHAT? Pollution of all priority substances which have been identified in the water area

-WHAT? Pollution with other substances which have been identified in significant quantities in the aquatic area ;

1.3. Transitional waters

Biological elements

-WHAT? Composition, density and biomass of the phytoplankton

-WHAT? Composition and density of other aquatic flora

-WHAT? Composition and density of the bentic invertebratine

-WHAT? Composition and density of fish fauna

Hydromorphological elements that support the biological elements

-Morphological conditions.

-depth variation

-the volume and structure of the bottom (structure and substrate)

-The structure of the tidal zone

-Tidewater regime

-freshwater flow.

-wave exposures

Chemical and physico-chemical elements supporting the biological elements

General

-WHAT? Page Depth

-WHAT? Thermal conditions

-WHAT? Oxytic conditions

-WHAT? Salinity

-WHAT? Near-nutrient conditions

Specific pollutants

-WHAT? Pollution of all priority substances which have been identified in the water area

-WHAT? Pollution with other substances which have been identified in significant quantities in the aquatic area ;

1.4. Coastal waters

Biological elements

-WHAT? Composition, density and biomass of the phytoplankton

-WHAT? Composition and density of other aquatic flora

-WHAT? Composition and density of the bentic invertebratine

Hydromorphological elements that support the biological elements

-Morphological conditions.

-depth variation

-bottom conditions (structure and substrate)

-The structure of the tidal zone

-Tidewater regime

direction of dominant power.

-wave exposures

Chemical and physico-chemical elements supporting the biological elements

General

-WHAT? Page Depth

-WHAT? Thermal conditions

-WHAT? Oxytic conditions

-WHAT? Salinity

-WHAT? Near-nutrient conditions

Specific pollutants

-WHAT? Pollution of all priority substances which have been identified in the water area

-WHAT? Pollution with other substances which have been identified in significant quantities in the aquatic area ;

1.5. Artificial and heavily modified surface water bodies

In the case of artificial and heavily modified surface waters, the quality elements shall be used for the four natural categories of surface water similar to the artificial or heavily modified surface water area in question.

2. Comparability of biological monitoring results

1) monitoring systems are established (methods of biological evaluation of the environmental condition) for the assessment of values for each category of surface water, including artificial and heavily modified water areas. In applying the procedures laid down in this section on artificial and heavily modified waters, ' ecological status ` shall be understood as ' ecological potential `. The monitoring systems may apply special species or groups of species representative of the quality element as a whole.

2) The biological monitoring results shall be expressed as organic quality ratios (EQR) for the purposes of classification of the ecological status of surface water bodies. These ratios represent the relationship between the values of the biological parameters observed for a given surface water area and the values of these parameters under the reference conditions applicable to the area concerned. The Ratio is expressed as a number value between zero and one, so that a high ecological status is represented by values close to one and a poor ecological status of values close to zero :

-For biological parameters, where the reference value is lower than the observed value, the organic quality ratio shall be calculated as the reference value divided by the observed value.

-For biological parameters, where the reference value is higher than the observed value, the organic quality ratio is calculated as the observed value divided by the reference value.

3) For each category of surface water, the scale of the ecological quality ratio of the monitoring systems shall be divided from high to poor ecological status as defined in Section 1 of Annex 1 to the publication of environmental objectives ; for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water, each of the boundaries between classes being given a numerictory value.

4) The Office shall participate in an exchange of information between the Member States of the European Union in order to establish a network of sites within each acoregion ; 1) for the use of the intercalibration of the monitoring systems established by No 1. The Management Board shall select sites for the network among a range of surface water bodies within each of the island coregions which Denmark is part of. For each selected surface water area, at least two locations are selected corresponding to the limit between high and sound ecological status and at least two locations corresponding to the border between good and moderate ecological status, cf. the normative definitions in section 2-5 of Annex 1 relating to the identification of environmental objectives for water flows, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water.

5) The Board of Natural Services shall apply the monitoring systems established by number 1 at the sites of the intercalibration network, which are in the region of the island region and are of the type of surface water to which the monitoring system is applied. The results of this are used to establish values for the appropriate limit values between quality classes in the tables in section 3.1-3.3.

3. Monitoring systems and limits between quality classes

Surveillance systems, ecological quality ratios, cf. Paragraph 2, nr. 2, values for type-specific reference conditions and, for certain biological quality elements in certain types of surface water bodies, river basin-specific reference conditions as laid down in section 2 (2). 3, in the notice of basic analysis and values for boundaries between quality classes, appear in the tables in section 3.1 3.3. The component type-sharing of surface waters is given in section 3 of Annex 1 to the notification of basic analysis.

3.1. Water Run

Composition and densities of aquatic flora

Table 1. The Danish water flow plan index, DVPI.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Type 1 Water Run
0.70
0.50
0.30
0.10
Type 2 and 3 water flows
0.70 *
0,50 *
0.30
0.10

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

Composition and density of the bentic invertebratine

Table 2. Dansk waterflow fauna index, DVFI.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Type 1 Water Run
1.0
0.71
0.57
0.43
Type 2 and 3 water flows
1.0 *
0.71 *
0.57
0.43

Type area
Faunaklasse
Reference-
value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Water Run By
type 1, 2 and 3,
7
Limit between 7 and 6
Limit between 5 and 4
Limit between 4 and 3
Limit between 2 and 1

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

Composition, densities and age structure of fish fauna

Table 3. Danish fish index for water (a), DFFVa.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Water running of all types
.94 *
0.72 *
0.40
0.11

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

Table 4. Dansk fish index for water (island), DFFVø.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Type 1 Water Run
0.81
0.50
0.25
0.06

Type area
Number of trout and salmon spawn per. 100 m 2 watercourses,
Reference-
value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Water Run By
type 1
> 130
130
80
40
10

Table 5. Dansk fish index for water (island), DFFVø.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Type 2 and 3 water flows
0.83
0.50
0.33
0.10

Type area
Number of trout and salmon spawn per. 100 m watercourses
Reference-
value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Water Run By
type 2 and 3
> 250
250
150
100
30

3.2. Searching

Composition, density and biomass of the phytoplankton

Table 6. Dansk seaplant plankton index, DSPI.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Lakes of type 1, 5 and 11
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
Sees of type 9 and 10
0.80 *
0.60 *
0.40
0.20

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

Table 7. Algebiomass measured as chlorophyll a 1 .

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Siils of type1-8, 10, 12 and 14
0.55
0.32
0.14
0.07
Siils of type 9, 11, 13 and 15
0.63
0.30
0.13
0.08

Type area
Chlorophyll a , µ g/l
Reference-
value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Siils of type1-8, 10, 12 and 14
3.85
7.0
12.0
27
56
Siils of type 9, 11, 13 and 15
7.5
11,7
25.0
56
90

1 The values in the table are used solely for the classification of ecological status for sows for which there is no sufficient data basis for classification following the Danish Sea Plant Plankton Index (DSPI).

Composition and density of other aquatic flora

Table 8. Dansk sea water plant index, DSVI.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Lakes of type 1 and 5
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
Sees of type 9 and 10
0.80 *
0.60 *
0.40
0.20

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

Composition, densities and age structure of fish fauna

Table 9. The Danish fishing index of the lakes, DFFS.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
Siils of type 9, 10 and 13
0.80
0.60
0.45
0.25

3.3. Coastal waters

Composition, density and biomass of the phytoplankton

Table 10. Algebiomass measured as chlorophyll a.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
OW 1 and 2
0.8 2
0.6 2
0.4 2
0.2 2
OW 3a
0.8 2 *I
0.6 2 *I
0.4 2
0.2 2
OW 3b and 3c
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
OW 4a
0.67 1
0.50 1
0.33 1
0.17 1
OW 4b
0.67 1 *I
0.44 1 *I
0.29 1
0.15 1
OW 5
0.67 1 *I
0.44 1 *I
0.29 1
0.15 1
O 3 and 4
0.8 2
0.6 2
0.4 2
0.2 2
M 1, 2, 3 and 4
0.8 2
0.6 2
0.4 2
0.2 2
P 1, 2, 3 and 4
0.8 2
0.6 2
0.4 2
0.2 2

Type area
Chlorophyll a , µ g/l
Reference-
value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
OW 1 and 2
1.0 2
1,2 2
1,6 2
2.4 2
4.8 2
OW 3a
0.9 2
1,1 2
1.5 2
2,3 2
4.5 2
OW 3b and 3c
1.0 2
1,3 2
1,7 2
2.6 2
5.1 2
OW 4a
2,0 1
3.0 1
4.0 1
6.1 1
11,8 1
OW 4b
3.0 1
4.5 1
6.9 1
10.5 1
20,2 1
OW 5
3.3 1
5.0 1 *I
7.5 1 *I
11,4 1
22,0 1
O 3 and 4
4.2 2
5.3 2
7.0 2
10.5 2
21,0 2
M 1 and 2
1,3 2
1,6 2
2,1 2
3.2 2
6.3 2
M 3 and 4
2,2 2
2.7 2
3.6 2
5.4 2
10.8 2
P 1 and 2
1,3 2
1,6 2
2,1 2
3.2 2
6.3 2
P 3 and 4
2,2 2
2.7 2
3.6 2
5.4 2
10.8 2

Waterways with river basin-specific reference conditions
Chlorophyll a , µ g/l
Reference-
value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
OW 1
Northern Kattegat, Ålbæk Bugt
1,1
1,4
1.9
2.9
5.7
OW 2
Northern Øresund
1.0
1,3
1,7
2.6
5.1
Storepods, NV
1,1
1,4
1.9
2.9
5.7
Djursland Øst
1,1
1,4
1.9
2.9
5.7
OW 3a
Storepods, SV
1.0
1,3
1,7
2.6
5.1
M 1
Mariager Fearth, Inner
3.6
4.5
6.0
9.0
18,0
M 2
Roskilde Fearth, Inner
2,2
2.7
3.6
5.4
10.8
P 1
Mariager Fjord, outer
2,2
2.7
3.6
5.4
10.8
P 3
Kalundborg Fsoil
1,3
1,6
2,1
3.2
6.3
Aarhus Bugt, Kalø Vig and Begtrup Vig
1,3
1,6
2,1
3.2
6.3
Bjørnholms Bugt, Riisgaard de Breing, Skive Fjord and Lovn's Breeding
3.6
4.5
6.0
9.0
18,0
Sending fjord
Nissum Fearth, Outer
4.8
6.0
8.0
12.0
24,0
Nissum Fland, between
4.8
6.0
8.0
12.0
24,0
Nissum Fj, Felsted Kog
4.8
6.0
8.0
12.0
24,0
Ringkøbing Fland
4.8
6.0
8.0
12.0
24,0
Hjarbæk Fjord
5.4
6.8
9.0
13.5
27,0

1 90%-frak for March September of more than five years.

2 Summertime (mai-September).

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

Composition and density of other aquatic flora

Table 11. Depth on the main spread of yargrass.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
OW 3a
0.90 *
0.74 *
0,5
0.25

Type area
Deep limit, m
Reference-
value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
OW 1 and 2
12.2
11,0
9.0
6.1
3.1
OW 3a
9.4
8.5 *
7.0 *
4.7
2.4
OW 3b and 3c
10.9
9.8
8.1
5.5
2.7
M 1
5.9
5.3
4.4
3.0
1.5
M 2
5.6
5.0
4.1
2.8
1,4
M 3 and 4
5.8
5.2
4.3
2.9
1.5
P 1
12.0
10.8
8.9
6.0
3.0
P 2
4.8
4.3
3.6
2.4
1,2
P 3
9.8
8.8
7.3
4.9
2,5
P 4
6.6
5.9
4.9
3.3
1,7

Water areas with river basin-specific reference conditions as well as low watered-water areas where certain limits between quality classes are not relevant due to small water depth ;
Deep limit, m
Baseline Value
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
M 1
Småland waters, south
9.2
8.3
6.8
4.6
2,3
Helnæs Bugt
7.5
6.8
5.6
3.8
1.9
Mariager Fearth, Inner
4.2
3.8
3.1
2,1
1,1
M 2
Roskilde Fearth, Inner
4.0
3.6
3.0
2,0
1.0
Korsor Nor
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1,4
Basnæs Nor
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1,4
Holsteinborg Nor
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
2.8
1,4
Crazy Fearth and Nor
5.6
Not applicable
4.1
2.8
1,4
Animal Island Fland
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1,4
Guldborgsund
5.4
4.8
4.0
2.7
1,3
Stege Nor
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
2.8
1,4
Fjord Faaborg
8.3
7.4
6.1
4.1
2,1
Lindelse Nor
8.3
Not applicable
Not applicable
4.1
2,1
The lion.
8.3
7.4
6.1
4.1
2,1
Orestrand
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Torø Vig, Torø Nor
7.5
6.8
5.6
3.8
1.9
Bågø Nor
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1,4
Lunkebay
6.8
6.1
5.0
3.4
1,7
Avnø Vig
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1,4
Hoist Nor
5.6
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1,4
M 3
Karrebroek Fjord
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
2.9
1.5
Nimble Fjord
8.4
7.5
6.2
4.2
2,1
The width
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1.5
Aborg Minde Nor
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1.5
Holckenhavn Fsoil
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1.5
Randers Fearth, Outer
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
2.9
1.5
M 4
Near Strand
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1.5
Emteczealous Nor
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1.5
Odense Fj., Seden Str.
5.6
5.1
4.2
2.8
1,4
Northern memory Fjord
5.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1.5
P 1
Gamburg Fjord
7.5
6.8
5.6
3.8
1.9
Nybøl Nor
9.2
8.3
6.8
4.6
2,3
Flensburg Fjord, Inner
10.1
9.1
7.5
5.1
2,5
Flensburg Fearth, Outer
13.0
11,7
9.6
6.5
3.3
Ebeltoft Vig
9.8
8.8
7.3
4.9
2,5
Knebel Vig
9.4
8.5
7.0
4.7
2.4
Kalø Vig, Inner
9.4
8.5
7.0
4.7
2.4
Mariager Fjord, outer
4.8
4.3
3.6
2.4
1,2
P 2
Isefjord, outer
7.4
6.7
5.5
3.7
1.9
Lillestrand
6.9
6.2
5.1
3.5
1,7
Stavns Fjord
9.8
Not applicable
Not applicable
4.9
2,5
Ice-fjord, inner-core.
6.9
6.2
5.1
3.5
1,7
P 3
Kerteminde Fearth
7.0
Not applicable
5.2
3.5
1.8
Nyborg Fearth
8.4
7.5
6.2
4.2
2,1
Odense Fearth, Outer
5.6
5.1
4.2
2.8
1,4
Vejle Fearth, Outer
11,4
10.3
8.4
5.7
2.9
Vejle Fjord, Inner
8.3
7.5
6.1
4.2
2,1
Kolding Fj., inner
5.6
5.0
4.1
2.8
1,4
Horsens Fj., Outer
11.5
10.4
8.5
5.8
2.9
Horsens. Inner.
8.6
7.7
6.4
4.3
2,2
Aarhus Bugt, Kalø Vig and Begtrup Vig
9.5
8.6
7.0
4.8
2.4
Bjørnholms Bugt, Riisgaard de Breing, Skive Fay and Lovns Breing
5.5
5.0
4.1
2.8
1,4
P 4
Dalby Bugt
7.5
6.8
5.6
3.8
1.9
Nissum Breding, Thisted Breding, Tie Breding, Lion Breding, Nibe Breding, and Langerak
5.5
5.0
4.1
2.8
1,4
Sending fjord
Nissum Fearth, Outer
2.8
2,5
2,0
1,4
0.7
Nissum Fland, between
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Nissum Fj., Felsted Kand
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Ringkøbing Fland
3.0
2.7
2,2
1.5
0.8
Hjarbæk Fjord
5.5
5.0
4.1
2.8
1,4

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

Composition and density of the bentic invertebratine

Table 12. Danish quality index ver. 2 (mollusk fauna), DKI2.

Type area
Organic quality ratio
Limit
high / good
Limit
Good / Moderate
Limit
moderat/rings
Limit
bad / bad
OW 1, 2, 3b and 3c
0.84 *
0.68 *
0.45
0.23
OW 3a
.86 *
0.72 *
0.48
0.24
OW 4b and 5
0.67 *
0.53 *
0.35
0.18
M 1, 2, 3 and 4
0.84
0.68
0.45
0.23
P 1, 2, 3 and 4
0.84
0.68
0.45
0.23
Sending fjord
0.84
0.68
0.45
0.23

* Value laid down in Commission Decision 2013 /480/EU.

3.4. Establishment of limits between quality classes

1) For the types of surface water for which relevant biological quality elements are not defined values for limits between quality classes in the tables in sections 3.1-3.3, the values for such limits are laid down on the basis of values for type-specific biological reference conditions as defined in section 2 (1). 3, in the notice of base analysis and the values in the tables listed,

-If, in a table in section 3.1 3.3 for a different type of the same category of surface water, limits are set for limits between quality classes, which, for the type concerned, will be consistent with the relevant normative definitions in Annex 1 to the identification of environmental targets for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater shall be used.

-When setting values for boundaries between quality classes, which are different from values in the tables in section 3.1 to 3.3 for other types of the same category of surface water, it must be ensured that the values laid down are in accordance with the above standard definitions and that they represent the same level of protection in relation to the human impact represented by the values in the listed tables.

2) The limit between quality classes shall be fixed in accordance with paragraph 1. 1 shall be inserted at the next part of the occasion in the relevant section 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3.

3.5. Modification of method for determining the reference conditions and setting values for limits between quality classes

Information to be made available in connection with the implementation of the monitoring programmes in Annexes 1 and the review and updating of the basic assessment may cover new knowledge which may lead to the adjustment of the monitoring and classification systems ; scientific and technical progress and, in the end, to a reassessment of limits between quality classes in the tables in sections 3.1-3.3, with a view to improving their quality.

If a prerequisite for a method used to determine the values for type-specific biological reference conditions, cf. Section 2 (2). 3, in the notice of the basic analysis or the setting of boundaries between quality classes, changes significantly, the method may be amended. The new reference values or values for limits between quality classes for the types of surface water concerned which will be the result of the application of the new method shall continue to be in conformity with the relevant standard definitions in : in paragraphs 2 to 5 of Annex 1 to the publication of the environmental objectives for water flows, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater, and shall represent the same level of protection in relation to the human exposure represented by the values in : the tables in section 3.1-3.3.

Part B. Grounding systems for groundwater

1. Guidelines for the determination of threshold values

1) The thresholds for all pollutants, groups of pollutants and polluting indicators resulting from the basic analysis are characterizing or contributing to the characterizing of groundwater bodies or groups ; groundwater bodies that are at risk of not being able to achieve good chemical groundwater status.

2) The threshold values shall be determined in such a way that if they are exceeded in a representative surveillance point, it indicates that there is a risk that one or more of the preconditions for good chemical groundwater status as referred to in part C, paragraph 8, no. 5 (b, c, c and d) is not fulfilled.

3) The determination of threshold values is based on :

-the extent of the interaction between groundwater and associated water ecosystems and dependent terrestrial ecosystems,

-impact on the actual or potential legitimate uses or functions of groundwater ;

-all pollutants characterizing groundwater bodies as being at risk of not being able to achieve good chemical groundwater status, taking into account the minimum list of divisions in Section 2 ; and

-Hydrogeological characteristics, including background information and water balance.

In particular, account shall be taken of, in particular, the effects of the groundwater body or group of the effects of the groundwater bodies and related surface areas and terrestrial ecosystems and wetlands which are directly related ; dependent on it, and, inter alia, the human toxicological and ecotoxicological knowledge, in particular. The determination of thresholds should also take place in the interest of the origin of the pollutants, potential natural occurrence, toxicology, dispersion stone, persistence and bioaccumulation potential.

4) Where natural hydrogeological causes occur in the case of increased background concentrations of substances, ions or indicators for this purpose, the determination of the threshold values shall be taken into account in the relevant background concentrations ; groundwater body instance. In determining the background concentrations, account should be taken of the following principles :

(a) The determination of background concentrations should be based on the characterization of groundwater bodies according to the rules of the notification of basic analyses and on the results of the groundwater monitoring according to the specifications in Appendix 2. The monitoring strategy ; and the interpretation of data should take into account the fact that the bastion of groundwater and chemical conditions vary horizontally and vertically.

b) Where limited groundwater monitoring data are available only, more data should be collected and, in the meantime, background concentrations should be determined on the basis of the limited surveillance data, possibly through a simplified procedure, the use of a subset of the samples for which the indicators do not show the influence of human activity. Where information on geochemical influences is available, they should also be involved.

c) If there are insufficient groundwater monitoring data and little information on geochemical impacts, more data and information should be collected and, in the meantime, background concentrations should be estimated, possibly on the basis of : statistical reference results obtained from other groundwater bodies of the same type in other areas, for which sufficient data are available.

5) Establishment of threshold values should be supported by a mechanism to control the collected data based on an evaluation of data quality, analytical considerations and background levels of substances that may occur both naturally and as a result of Human activities.

6) For the transboundary groundwater bodies which Denmark and Germany share, the definition of threshold values with Germany under section 2 of the International Water District will be announced in section 2.

2. Minimum list of pollutants and indicators for which to consider set thresholds

Substances or non-ions or indicators likely to occur naturally or as a result of human activities :

-WHAT? arsenary

-WHAT? Cadmium

-WHAT? Lead

-WHAT? mercury

-WHAT? Ammonium

-WHAT? chloride

-WHAT? sulphate

-WHAT? nitrites

-WHAT? phosphates (total) /phosfates, 2) .

Man-made synthetic drugs :

-WHAT? Trichloroethylene

-WHAT? Tetrachloroethylene.

Parameters, which are indicators of salt or other invaders 3) :

-WHAT? conductivity.

3. Studies on the chemical status of groundwater bodies

1) The procedures contained in this section for testing to determine the chemical status of a groundwater body or group of groundwater bodies are carried out for all groundwater bodies or groups of ground water deposits at risk ; not be able to achieve good chemical groundwater status, and for each pollutant that contributes to the characterisation of the groundwater body or group of groundwater bodies.

2) For the surveys referred to in Part C, section 8, nr. 5, account shall be taken of :

-information gathered as part of the base analysis,

the results of the ground water monitoring ; and

-any other relevant information, including a comparison between the annual arithmetic average concentration of the pollutants concerned in a monitoring point and the groundwater quality requirements set out in Annex 3 for the establishment of the establishment of the contract ; environmental objectives for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water and the threshold values in Annex 4.

3) For examination of the requirements for good chemical groundwater status in Part C, section 8, nr. The five (a) and (d) shall be fulfilled where appropriate and possible on the basis of an appropriate aggregation of the results of the monitoring results, where appropriate on the basis of estimated concentration based on a conceptual model of the groundwater body ; or the group of groundwater bodies, an assessment of the extent of the groundwater body which has an annual arithmetic mean concentration of a pollutant which lies above the groundwater quality requirement or a threshold value.

4) For examination of the requirements for good chemical groundwater status in Part C, section 8, nr. 5 (b) and (c) have been met, assessed where appropriate and possible, on the basis of relevant monitoring results and a suitable conceptual model of the groundwater body ;

-the impact of pollutants in groundwater bodies,

-quantities and concentrations of pollutants transferred or are likely to be transferred from the groundwater body to the associated surface water or directly-dependent terrestrial ecosystems,

-the estimated impact of the quantities and concentrations of pollutants transferred to the associated surface water areas and directly dependent terrestrial ecosystems,

-the volume of salt or other invaders in the groundwater body, and

-the risk that pollutants in the groundwater body are for the quality of drinking water that are recovered or are likely to be recovered from the groundwater body.

Part C. Evaluation of monitoring results and classification of environmental status

1. General

1) If the content of a physical or chemical measurement size in a given sample is below the quantification limit, the half of quantification limit is used as the result of calculation of middle values.

2) If the calculated mean value of the measurement results, cf. no. 1, lower than the quantification limit, the value as being below the quantification limit.

3) No 1 shall not apply to measuring sizes consisting of the sum of a given group of physico-chemical parameters or chemical measurement sizes, including their metabolites and degradation and reaction products. In these cases, results smaller than the quantification limit of the individual substances shall be reduced to zero.

2. Evaluation and classification of ecological status of surface waters

1) For the classification of the ecological status of each surface water area,

(a) the monitoring results of biological quality elements referred to in Part A, section 1.1-1.4, shall be compared with the standard definitions in the relevant section 2 to 5 of Annex 1 to the publication of the environmental objectives for water flows, lakes ; the transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water and the relevant range of quality classes defined in Part A, section 3.1-3.3, or as determined by the procedures laid down in Part A, section 3.4-3.5,

(b) monitoring results for physico-chemical quality elements and hydromorphological quality elements shall be compared with the standard definitions for these quality elements of the relevant section 2 to 5 of Annex 1 to the establishment of the establishment of the contract ; environmental objectives for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water ; including monitoring results for specific pollutants with the environmental quality requirements for pollutants shown in Part B of Annex 2 to the notice of : the definition of environmental objectives for watercourses, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water,

cf. No! 2.

2) For the classification of the ecological potential of artificial and heavily modified waters of water,

(a) the monitoring results of biological quality elements referred to in Part A, section 1.5, shall be compared with the standard definitions for these quality elements in Section 6 of Annex 1 to the publication of the environmental objectives for water flows, lakes ; transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water ; and

(b) monitoring results for physico-chemical quality elements and hydromorphological quality elements shall be compared with the standard definitions for these quality elements in Section 6 of Annex 1 to the publication of the environmental objectives ; watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water ; including monitoring results for specific pollutants with the environmental quality requirements for pollutants, as set out in Part B of Annex 2 to the establishment of the identification of : environmental targets for watercourses, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water.

3) A surface water area ecological status or ecological potential shall be classified as high, good, moderate, poor, or poor, at a maximum, good, moderate, poor, poor, or poorly, depending on the lowest of the biological values of the biological agents ; and the chemical and physico-chemical quality elements, cf. No! 4.

4) If the surface water area values for physico-chemical and hydromorphological quality elements do not correspond to the high ecological status of these quality elements or the maximum ecological potential for that category, surface water, the ecological status or ecological potential of regardless of the values for the biological quality elements shall not be classified as good or good.

3. Evaluation and classification of the chemical status of surface water bodies

3.1. Analysis of long-term developmentally trends in concentrations of priority substances

On the basis of monitoring results for specific pollutants, the long-term trends in concentrations of priority substances tend to be analysed in concentrations of priority substances which tend to be accumulated in sediments and biota, including special matter No. 2, 5, 6, 7, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21, 26, 28, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 43 and 44 referred to in Part C Section 1 of Annex 2 to the publication of the environmental objectives for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water, for the purpose of determining : measures to ensure that such concentrations do not substantially rise in sediments or relevant biota.

3.2. Evaluation and classification of chemical status

1) For the classification of the chemical status of surface water bodies, monitoring results for specific pollutants must be compared with the environmental quality requirements for pollutants shown in Part C of Part C of Annex 2 to the notice ; on the definition of environmental targets for watercourses, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water.

2) If a surface water area meets all the environmental quality requirements listed in that Annex 2, Part C, section 1, the chemical status of the surface water area shall be classified as good. If the surface water area does not comply with all environmental quality requirements, as shown in the said Annex 2, part C, section 1, the chemical status is classified as non-good.

3) If the calculated mean value of a measure in accordance with Section 1, which is carried out using the best available techniques for measuring the substance in question, it is referred to as being less than the quantification limit of the measured substance and the quantification limit for this technique exceeds the environmental quality requirements for the substance mentioned in Part C of Annex 2, Part C, section 1, the result of the substance is not taken into account when evaluating it. chemical status as a whole for the water area concerned.

4) In assessing the chemical status of a surface water area for which, through measured or estimated concentrations in the environment or emissions, a possible risk to the aquatic environment or via the aquatic environment has been identified from acute exposure ; with the pollutants referred to in the said Annex 2, part C, section 1, the relevant substances shall be used for the quality of short-term surface quality of surface water if the said Annex 2, Part C, section 1 of that Annex is shown.

5) When the monitoring results are evaluated in relation to the relevant environmental quality requirements, account may be taken of :

(a) the natural background concentrations of cadmium and cadmium compounds, lead and lead compounds, mercury and mercury compounds and nickel and nickel compounds if such concentrations make it impossible to comply with the relevant ; environmental quality standards,

(b) The hardness of the water, pH, dissolved organic carbon or other quality parameters that affect the bioavailability of metal and the bioavailability of bioavailability shall be determined on the basis of this suitable modelling of bioavailability.

4. Evaluation of the quality of shellfish waters

1) In assessing the quality of surface water areas designated as shellfish, the results of the test sampling shall be compared with the quality requirements laid down in Annexes 1 and 2 to the EQC for the quality of shellfish.

2) Scales are considered to comply with the products referred to in paragraph 1. 1 the quality requirements referred to above, where water samples taken from the surface waters of the body in question are at the same sampling point over a 12-month period of intervals not longer than those specified in Table 2 of Annex 1 to this Directive ; announcement, show,

(a) 100% of the samples are in accordance with the above. the quality requirements referred to in paragraph 1 for the organic halogen compounds and metals,

(b) 95% of the samples are in accordance with the above. the quality requirements of the parameters referred to in the parameters of salt content and dissolved oxygen ; and

(c) 75% of the samples are in compliance with those in point 1 qualitative requirements for other parameters.

Where there is further water between the intervals for sampling other than the intervals indicated in that Table 2, all the tests must comply with the products listed in paragraph 1. the quality requirements referred to in paragraph 1 shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of the quality requirements.

3) Deviations from the quality requirements laid down shall not be taken into account for the calculation of the quality standards referred to in paragraph 1. 2 fixed percentages, if due to a disaster.

5. Evaluation and classification of the quantitative status of groundwater bodies

1) For the classification of the quantitative status of the groundwater bodies, monitoring results for changes in the groundwater level shall be compared with the definition of good quantitative status for groundwater in Annex 3 to the establishment of the establishment of the contract ; environmental targets for watercourses, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water.

2) If the monitoring results for a groundwater body or group of groundwater are assessed to be in conformity with the definition of good quantitative status for groundwater in Annex 3, for the publication of the environmental objectives for the purposes of the establishment of the environment, water flows, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water shall be classified the quantitative status of the groundwater body or the group of groundwater bodies as good. If the monitoring results are assessed not to be in conformity with that definition, the quantitative status shall be classified as being poor.

6. Identification and assessment of development trends for pollutants in groundwater

1) Long-term anthropogenic trends for increasing concentrations of pollutants in groundwater bodies or groups of groundwater bodies and changes in such trends, including the turn of turn resulting from the intervention programme, are identified ; the background of data from control monitoring and operational monitoring of the chemical status of the groundwater. Tendences and changes therein are shown statistically, cf. no. 2.

2) Calculation of trends and changes thereto is carried out for the individual groundwater body or group of groundwater bodies and is based on a statistical method, such as regression analysis, for the analysis of trends in the time series in the individual monitoring points. In order to avoid distortions in the identification of trends, the target result shall be subject to the quantification limit of half the value of the highest quantification limit that occurs in the time series, except for the total, pesticide content.

3) Identification of essential and sustained upward trends in the concentrations of substances occurring both naturally and as a result of human activity shall be taken into account for the baseline concentrations and historical data, if : such data is available.

4) Where it is necessary to assess the impact of existing pollution tabs in groundwater bodies which may make it difficult to achieve the objective of good groundwater status at the end of the planned period following the last basic analysis, In particular, the impact of pollution tabs caused by bullet sources and soil pollution is carried out by further assessments in relation to identified pollutants in order to verify that the pollutants do not spread, do not impair it ; chemical status of the groundwater body or the group of groundwater bodies ; and does not pose a risk to human health and to the environment.

7. Determination of the starting points for the turn of upward trends in ground water

1) The starting point to implement measures to reverse essential and sustained upward trends in the concentrations of pollutants in groundwater shall be determined as a percentage of the criteria for the quality of groundwater established ; in Annex 3, for the publication of the environmental objectives for water, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water and the threshold values shown in Annex 4.

2) The measures shall be implemented where the concentration of the pollutant in question reaches 75% of the quality requirement or threshold fixed for the substance, unless :

a previous point of departure for the implementation of measures is necessary in order to prevent significant deterioration of the basic quality of groundwater in the most cost-effective manner or at least as far as possible to limit them ;

(b) a different starting point for the implementation of measures is justified where the limit on the detection limit is not possible to detect a trend of concentrations equal to 75% of the parameter values, or

(c) The thrust of the trend and the possibility of turning it over by a later starting point for the implementation of measures will continue to be possible to prevent significant deterioration of the quality of groundwater in the most cost-effective, or at least, as far as possible, limit them. Such a future basis should not lead to delays in compliance with the deadline for meeting the environmental objectives.

For activities covered by the Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC) the starting point for the implementation of measures shall be determined in accordance with both this Directive and the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), and in particular the maintenance of the objectives in section 7 ; paragraph 2, no. Two, in the law of water planning.

3) As soon as a starting point for the implementation of measures has been laid down for a groundwater body which, according to the basic analysis, is characterized as endangered, cannot be changed in the course of the six-year river basin period.

4) The transmission of trends must be demonstrated by means of the chemical status monitoring programmes as specified in Part B of Annex 2, Section 4.

8. Evaluation and classification of the chemical status of groundwater bodies

1) For the classification of chemical status classification of the chemical status of the groundwater body, monitoring results for archability and concentrations of pollutants must be compared with the definition of good chemical status for groundwater in Annex 3 to the publication of the environmental objectives for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water and the threshold values shown in Annex 4.

2) In assessing the chemical status of groundwater, the data from the individual monitoring points in a groundwater body of the groundwater body is aggregated as a whole. The assessment of the chemical status of groundwater shall be based on the calculation of the average of the results obtained from each monitoring point in the groundwater body or the group of groundwater bodies, cf. Paragraph 1.

3) If the monitoring results for a groundwater body or group of groundwater are in accordance with the definition of good chemical status for groundwater in Annex 3, for the publication of water-run, sweetener, lakes, the transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater shall be classified the chemical status of the groundwater body or the group of groundwater bodies as good. Where the results of the monitoring results are not in accordance with that definition, the chemical status of the call shall be classified, cf. No! 4 and 5.

4) If the performance of the monitoring results shows that the quality requirements for groundwater are set out in Annex 3 for the publication of water-flows, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water and relevant threshold values shown in Annex 4 are not ; exceeded in any of the monitoring points of the groundwater body or the group of groundwater bodies, the chemical status of the groundwater body or the group of groundwater bodies shall be classified as good.

5) If the results of the monitoring results are non-compliance with the definition of good chemical status for groundwater in Annex 3, for the publication of water flows, sweetener, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water are due to the overrun of the the quality requirements for ground water set out in that Annex 3 or relevant threshold values shown in Annex 4 of one or more monitoring points shall be classified the chemical status of the groundwater body or the group of groundwater bodies as good, where an appropriate examination is carried out in accordance with Part B, section 3, Confirming

a), on the basis of the assessment referred to in Part B, paragraph 3, 3, may be established that the concentrations of pollutants exceeding the quality requirements or thresholds are not considered to constitute a major environmental risk, taking account of the extent of the quality of the water ; aquifers of groundwater,

b) that the other conditions of good chemical status for groundwater as set out in the definition of good chemical status for groundwater in Annex 3 to the publication of the environmental objectives for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water have been met ; cf. Part B, section 3, nr. 4,

c) that for groundwater bodies designated as drinking water deposits in accordance with section 16 of the Law on water planning, the criteria are met in the same section 17 in accordance with Part B, section 3, paragraph 3, 4, and

(d) that the groundwater body or the individual occurrences in the group of groundwater bodies are not so polluted that people's ability to use them has been significantly deteriorated.

9. Presentation of monitoring results

In the case of each river basin district, maps, which for each surface water and each groundwater body or group of groundwater bodies, show the environmental condition.

9.1. Environmental status of surface water (s)

A map shall be drawn up, for the various categories of surface water areas, the ecological status of each surface water area or ecological potential as classified according to the specifications in section 2. The colour codes are used as indicated ; in Table 13 and 14. surface water areas which have not achieved good ecological status or, where appropriate, good ecological potential as a result of non-compliance with the environmental quality requirements for pollutants shown in Part B of Annex 2 to the notice ; establishing environmental targets for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water are marked with a black dot on the cards.

Map, for the various categories of surface water, shall show the chemical status of each surface water area, classified according to the specifications in section 3. Color codes are used as specified in Table 15.

Additional cards may be drawn up, presenting the chemical status information for one or more of the following substances separately from information relating to the rest of the substances listed in Section 1 of Part C of Annex 2 to the notice of : the definition of environmental targets for watercourses, lakes, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water :

a) substance no. 5, 21, 28, 30, 35, 37, 43 and 44 (substances acting as omnipresent PBTs 4) ,

b) substance no. 34-45 (newly identified substances), and

c) substance no. 2, 5, 15, 20, 22, 23 and 28 (substances in respect of which revised and stricter environmental quality requirements have been laid down).

For the purpose of this, the deviation from the environmental performance criteria referred to in Part C of Annex 2, Section 1, for the substances referred to in (a, b and (c), may be stated. If such additional cards are drawn up, it shall be ensured as far as possible to ensure that they are comparable at river basin management and EU level.

Table 13. Color codes to display the ecological status of surface water areas.

High ecological status
Blue
Good ecological status
Green
Moderate ecological status
Yellow
Poor ecological status
Orange
Poor ecological status
Red

Table 14. Color codes for the detection of ecological potential for artificial and heavily modified water areas.

Artifiatic Water Areas
Stuck-modified water areas
Good ecological potential and more
Wrestling with straight green and light-gray stripes
Covering with straight green and darky stripes
Moderate ecological potential
Wrestling with straight yellow and light-gray stripes
Covering with straight yellow and dark-gray stripes
Poor ecological potential
Wrestling with just wide orange and light-gray stripes
Covering with just wide orange and dark-gray stripes
Poor ecological potential
Hits with straight red and light-gray stripes
Covering with straight red and dark-gray stripes

Table 15. Color codes for the display of the chemical status of surface water bodies.

Good Chemical Mode
Blue
Not good chemical mode
Red

9.2. Map of the environmental status of groundwater bodies

Card shall be drawn up for each groundwater body or group of groundwater bodies showing the quantitative status of the groundwater as classified according to the specifications in section 5. Color codes are used as specified in Table 16.

Furthermore, maps shall be drawn up for each groundwater instance or group of groundwater bodies showing the chemical status of groundwater as classified according to the specifications in section 8. Color codes are used as specified in Table 17. Where appropriate and possible, all the monitoring points where the quality requirements for groundwater are set out in Annex 3 for the publication of water-flows, sea, transitional waters, coastal waters and ground water or threshold values shown in Annex 4 is exceeded.

Moreover, with a black speck on the cards, the groundwater bodies that are exposed to a significant and sustained trend towards increasing concentrations of pollutants resulting from human activity are being displayed. Changes in a trend of development are accompanied by a blue dot on the cards.

Table 16. Color codes for the view of the quantitative status of groundwater bodies.

Good quantitative status
Green
Ringe quantitative mode
Red

Table 17. Color codes to display the chemical status of the groundwater bodies.

Good Chemical Mode
Green
Poor chemical mode
Red


Appendix 4

Groundskewn values for groundwater bodies

For groundwater bodies, the general thresholds for pollutants, groups of pollutants and polluting indicators laid down in accordance with the guidelines set out in Part B of Annex 3 and in Table 1 shall be shown in Table 1, cf. No! 2.

In the case of a groundwater body according to the said guideline, a specific threshold value as shown in Table 2-21 for a pollutant, a group of pollutants or a pollutant indicator, shall apply this threshold instead of the threshold value of Table 1.

Table 1. General threshold values for groundwater bodies.

Staf / Contaminator Indicator
Pie Value
Aluminum
100 µ g/l
Arsence
5 µ g/l
Bly
5 µ g/l
BTEX (oil and benzoinsters)
1 µ g/l *
Cadmium
2 µ g/l
Mercury
1 µ g/l
Nickel
20 µ g/l
Copied solvents
1 µ g/l *
Klorid
250 mg/l
sulphate
250 mg/l

* The threshold value applies to individual substances within the group of pollutants in question.

Table 2. Specific thresholds for groundwater bodies in the main water upstate 1.2, Limfjfjorden.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 1.2 456 100
6 µ g/l
DK 1.2 456 215
6 µ g/l
DK 1.2 456 216
7 µ g/l
DK 1.2 456 217
6 µ g/l
DK 1.2 456 68
6 µ g/l
DK 1.2 456 69
7 µ g /

Table 3. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 1.4, Nissum Fearth.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Aluminum
DK 1.4 456 108
500 µ g/l
Nickel
DK 1.4 456 108
28 µ g/l

Table 4. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 1.5, Randers Fearth.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 1.5 456 117
7 µ g/l
DK 1.5 456 123
10 µ g/l
DK 1.5 456 125
6 µ g/l
DK 1.5 456 214
6 µ g/l

Table 5. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 1.6, Djursland.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 1.6 456 129
6 µ g/l
DOCK 1.6 456 130
6 µ g/l

Table 6. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 1.7, Aarhus Bugt.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 1.7 456 133
6 µ g/l
DK 1.7 456 138
7 µ g/l
DK 1.7 456 139
7 µ g/l

Table 7. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in main water ashore 1.8, Ringkøbing Fland.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Aluminum
DK 1.8 456 222
1300 µ g/l

Table 8. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 1.9, HorseFsoil.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DICKS 1.9 456 149
9 µ g/l
DK 1.9 456 152
9 µ g/l
DK 1.9 456 153
8 µ g/l
DK 1.9 456 154
9 µ g/l

Table 9. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in main water upland 1.10, Vadesea.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Aluminum
DICKS 1.10 456 14
150 µ g/l
DICKS 1.10 456 169
150 µ g/l
DECK 1.10 456 186
1173 µ g/l
DECK 1.10 456 188
1400 µ g/l
DECK 1.10 456 205
150 µ g/l
DECK 1.10 456 9
281 µ g/l
Nickel
DECK 1.10 456 9
23 µ g/l

Table 10. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 1.11, lime-waist / Jylland.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Aluminum
DECK 1.11 456 16
263 µ g/l
Arsence
DECK 1.11 456 16
6 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 17
9 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 18
7 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 201
8 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 16
6 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 17
9 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 18
7 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 201
8 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 16
6 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 17
9 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 28
8 µ g/l
DECK 1.11 456 29
8 µ g/l

Table 11. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 1.12, Littlebelt / Fyn.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DECK 1.12 331
12 µ g/l
DK 1.12 3 33
10 µ g/l
DK 1.12 3 34
9 µ g/l

Table 12. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in main water upland 1.14, Storepods.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 1.14 3 48
6 µ g/l

Table 13. Pie values for the main water upland 1.15, the South of the Sea of South.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 1.15 3 51
11 µ g/l
DK 1.15 3 53
8 µ g/l
DK 1.15 3 57
10 µ g/l

Table 14. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upstate 2.1, Kalundborg.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 2.1 12 254
7 µ g/l
DK 2.1 12 258
6 µ g/l

Table 15. Specific thresholds for groundwater bodies in the main water opashore 2.2, soil fjord and Roskilde Fearth.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 2.2 12 260
7 µ g/l
DK 2.2 12 263
7 µ g/l
DK 2.2 12 264
6 µ g/l

Table 16. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 2.5, the waterway waters.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 2.5 12 291
13 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 293
10 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 296
13 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 297
20 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 299
13 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 302
9 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 303
19 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 305
12 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 308
15 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 309
11 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 310
13 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 311
13 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 312
13 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 313
12 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 314
9 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 315
10 µ g/l
DK 2.5 12 407
12 µ g/l

Table 17. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 2.6, Baltic Sea.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 2.6 12 318
20 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 326
10 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 331
20 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 332
19 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 334
20 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 339
9 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 342
13 µ g/l
DC 2.6 12 343
13 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 344
13 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 345
13 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 346
13 µ g/l
DK 2.6 12 408
11 µ g/l

Table 18. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in the main water upland 3.1, Bornholm.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 3.1 7 386
6 µ g/l

Table 19. Specific thresholds for groundwater bodies on Fyn, with ties to several main water main countries.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DECK 1 3 156
10 µ g/l
DK 1 3 157
11 µ g/l
DK 1 3 158
10 µ g/l
DK 1 3 159
7 µ g/l
DK 1 3 160
10 µ g/l
DK 1 3 161
12 µ g/l
DK 1 3 162
11 µ g/l
DK 1 3 32
11 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 35
9 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 37
7 µ g/l
DK 1 3 38
9 µ g/l
DK 1 3 39
11 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 43
8 µ g/l
DK 1 3 44
12 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 45
11 µ g/l
DK 1 3 47
7 µ g/l
DK 1 3 49
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 50
8 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 54
12 µ g/l
DK 1 3 55
11 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 56
11 µ g/l
DECK 1 3 58
11 µ g/l

Table 20. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies in Jutland, linked to several main water main countries.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Aluminum
DECK 1 456 140
1128 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 184
283 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 185
813 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 187
1400 µ g/l
DK 1 456 192
197 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 194
705 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 197
110 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 199
127 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 213
350 µ g/l
DK 1 456 226
959 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 227
104 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 229
107 µ g/l
DK 1 456 230
286 µ g/l
DK 1 456 232
126 µ g/l
DK 1 456 233
216 µ g/l
DK 1 456 234
340 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 235
299 µ g/l
DK 1 456 241
144 µ g/l
DK 1 456 242
225 µ g/l
DK 1 456 243
193 µ g/l
DK 1 456 244
159 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 8
950 µ g/l
Arsence
DECK 1 456 115
6 µ g/l
DK 1 456 116
8 µ g/l
DK 1 456 134
10 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 147
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 148
9 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 15
20 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 170
6 µ g/l
DK 1 456 172
7 µ g/l
DK 1 456 173
7 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 175
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 176
7 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 178
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 180
9 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 181
7 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 182
10 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 191
6 µ g/l
DK 1 456 192
8 µ g/l
DK 1 456 193
8 µ g/l
DK 1 456 195
7 µ g/l
DK 1 456 202
11 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 209
9 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 218
8 µ g/l
DK 1 456 224
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 231
6 µ g/l
DK 1 456 232
6 µ g/l
DK 1 456 233
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 237
7 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 239
7 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 240
6 µ g/l
DK 1 456 246
20 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 6
7 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 60
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 61
7 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 88
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 89
6 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 94
9 µ g/l
Nickel
DECK 1 456 194
24 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 213
23 µ g/l
DK 1 456 230
23 µ g/l
DK 1 456 233
22 µ g/l
DK 1 456 234
22 µ g/l
DECK 1 456 235
23 µ g/l

Table 21. Specific threshold values for groundwater bodies with links to several main water main countries.

Stof
Groundwater occurrence
Pie Value
Arsence
DK 2 12 249
7 µ g/l
DK 2 12 251
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 252
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 256
8 µ g/l
DK 2 12 257
10 µ g/l
DK 2 12 261
7 µ g/l
DK 2 12 268
7 µ g/l
DK 2 12 269
7 µ g/l
DK 2 12 270
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 288
11 µ g/l
DK 2 12 289
19 µ g/l
DK 2 12 290
18 µ g/l
DK 2 12 292
20 µ g/l
DK 2 12 288
11 µ g/l
DK 2 12 320
19 µ g/l
DK 2 12 322
13 µ g/l
DK 2 12 323
20 µ g/l
DK 2 12 349
11 µ g/l
DK 2 12 350
14 µ g/l
DK 2 12 351
15 µ g/l
DK 2 12 354
17 µ g/l
DK 2 12 355
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 356
16 µ g/l
DK 2 12 357
18 µ g/l
DK 2 12 360
14 µ g/l
DK 2 12 361
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 363
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 367
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 369
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 370
8 µ g/l
DK 2 12 371
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 372
6 µ g/l
DK 2 12 374
17 µ g/l
DK 2 12 378
7 µ g/l

Official notes

1) The announcement contains provisions which implement parts of Commission Directive 2009 /93/EC of 31. July 2009 on technical specifications for chemical analysis and the control of water status, as referred to in the European Parliament and Council Directive 2000 /60/EC, EU Official Journal 2009, L 201, p. Directive 36, parts of Directive 2008 /105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16. In December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directive 82 / 1 7 6 / EEC, 83 /513/EEC, 84 /156/EEC, 84 /491/EEC and 86 /280/EEC and amending Directive 2000 /60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 2008, no. L 348, s. Directive 84, parts of Directive 2006 /118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12. In December 2006, on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (the Groundwater Directive), EU Official Journal, nr. L 372, s. Directive 19, parts of Directive 2006 /113/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12. In December 2006, the quality requirements for shellfish waters (codified version), EU Official Journal, nr. L 376, s. 14, parts of Directive 2000 /60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23. In October 2000, laying down a framework for the Community's water policy measures (the Water Framework Directive), the Official Journal of the European Union (Water Framework Directive). L 327, page 1, parts of Council Directive 92 /43/EEC of 21. May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora (Habats Directive), EC-1992. In 206, page 7, parts of Council Directive 91 /676/EEC of 12. December 1991 on the protection of water against pollution caused by nitrates originating from agriculture (the Nitrates Directive), EC-1991. L 375, s. 1, parts of Council Directive 91 /271/EEC of 21. 1 May 1991 on urban waste water treatment (the urban waste water directive), the EC Official Journal of 1991, no. In 135, s. 40, parts of Council Directive 79 /409/EEC of 2. April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (the Birds Protection Directive), the Community Official Journal, no. I'm 103, s. 1, and parts of Council Decision 77 /795/EEC of 12. In December 1977 establishing a common procedure for the exchange of information concerning the quality of fresh surface waters in the Community, the Official Journal of the European Communities, L 334, s. 29.

1) The number of stations is based on the following : at least one monitor station plus one station is selected because Denmark has more than one million inhabitants, plus the number of stations corresponding to Denmark's area in the square divided by 60 000 rounded off to the nearest whole number, plus the number of stations corresponding to Denmark's population divided by five million and rounded to the nearest whole number.

1) Ocoregions for watercourses and lakes are set out in a short A in Part A, section 2.5, in Annex 1 to the notice of basic analysis. Ocoregions for transitional waters and coastal waters are set out in cards B in the same place.

2) Threshold values may be fixed for either phosphates (total) or phosphates.

3) As far as salt is concerned, thresholds may be set for either sulfate and chloride or conductivity.

4) PBT substances : Substances which are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic.