Section I	Experm
Chapter 1	Objective
Chapter 2	Sampling and organisation of samples
Chapter 3	Detention of samples, etc.
Chapter 4	The assessment and so forth.
Chapter 5	Special tests
Chapter 6	Requirements for the study system
Chapter 7	Examination and so on.
Chapter 8	Complations of samples, etc.
Chapter 9	Other Rules
TITLE II	Censorship
Chapter 10	Censorcorps
Chapter 11	Censores
TITLE III	Entry into force and transitional provisions
Chapter 12	Entry into force and transitional provisions

Completion of the degree and censorship at university graduates (diplomas)

In accordance with Article 8 (2), 1, 2 and 4, and section 34 (4). 1, in the case of universities (university law), cf. Law Order no. 367 of 25. March 2013, as amended by law no. 898 of 4. July 2013 :

§ 1. The announcement shall apply to the degree and censorship of undergrad and candidate education, and master training and other part-time training, subject to the university law, unless otherwise specified in the notice of training.

Paragraph 2. The rules on the first-year test of undergraduate training, cf. ~ § 15 -17, if retrial, cf. Section 18, whether or not enrolment for the degree of undergraduate studies and candidate training, cf. Section 14, paragraph 14. 1-3, and about the study test of undergraduate studies, cf. Section 27 does not apply to students who are admitted to undergrad and candidate education according to the rules on part-time training, cf. the notice of subtraining at the universities (parttime notice).

Paragraph 3. This notice does not apply to training courses which are covered by the announcement of the international training courses of universities, unless otherwise stated in the notice of the international training courses of universities.

Section I

Experm

Chapter 1

Objective

§ 2. The purpose of the examination is to assess the degree to which the student meets the technical objectives laid down for the courses of study or vocational training courses in the study. The final test provides the basis for the issuance of diplomas, cf. Section 31 (1). 1.

Paragraph 2. The university sets out in the study scheme for the training precise target descriptions and criteria for assessment

the target fill for the individual subject or trade union elements, which are completed with a test, see it in : see. the report on character scale and other assessment of university education (character notice).

Chapter 2

Sampling and organisation of samples

§ 3. The training shall contain a variation of sample forms to reflect the content and work forms of the notification. The sample must satisfy the purposes of each professional or professional element and may, for example, be oral, in writing, practical tests and the project-oriented flow and combinations of the various test forms. In the course of study, the university is a choice of the test form of the profession or the professional element.

Paragraph 2. The university may set out in the study scheme that a trade or trade component, whose contents and its form of work are justified, in whole or in part, by requirements for participation in the teaching. The university may also stipulate that the requirement to participate in the training must be a precondition for the student body to be audited in the profession or the trade element.

Paragraph 3. The university may lay down in the study scheme that the delivery of written task responses and so on during the training must be a precondition for the student body to be audited in the profession or the professional element.

Paragraph 4. The university may lay down in the student scheme that prior to the assessment of a task response, an oral defence of the task response must be organized. The assessment shall be carried out on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of the written task of response and the oral performance, cf. Section 4 (4). 4.

§ 4. The university is determined in the field of study of the study, whether a trial is organized as an individual sample or as a group test. When a test is organized as a group test, the university shall establish at the same time how many students may participate in the individual group test and whether or not the student can select an individual sample. In the case of an individual sample as well as a group test, an individual assessment of the performance of students and the individual characters must be individually assessed.

Paragraph 2. In an oral group, the individual students shall be examined in such a way as to ensure that an individual assessment of the study is carried out. When organising an oral group, the university must ensure that the time allocated to the test shall be adjusted to the number of students participating in the test.

Paragraph 3. In the case of a written task of writing which has been drawn up by several students, only a separate nature or other assessment can be given if the contribution of each student's contribution can be found. The university defines requirements for individualisation in the study scheme.

Paragraph 4. Where an independent nature or other assessment of a written task response, drawn up by several students, may be included in the evaluation shall be included in the evaluation by a subsequent oral test.

Chapter 3

Detention of samples, etc.

§ 5. Oral tests are public, cf. however, paragraph 1 2-4, unless they are covered by a contract after Article 45 (3). 2.

Paragraph 2. Clinical samples of patient participation are only public with the permission of the patient.

Paragraph 3. The university may derogate from the provision in paragraph 1. 1 if there are special circumstances, including where the reference to the student speaks for this. In addition, the university can limit access to the enclosure, for reasons of space, and individuals may be denied access or be expelled if necessary to ensure the necessary order of the test.

Paragraph 4. Detasures the university an individual oral test as a follow-up to a written task of writing which has been drawn up by several students and as a follow-up to a possible oral group test, these students may not be present in the enclosure, before they are to be finals in the individual oral test.

Paragraph 5. The sound and image recordings of a sample are not allowed unless the recordings are part of the test flow. The footage is made by the university.

Paragraph 6. Only examiner and censor may be present during the deliberation by oral tests, cf. 20. The university can, however, decide that future examiners must be allowed to overtake a voter.

§ 6. In the case of studies offered in Danish, the tests shall be made in Danish, cf. however, paragraph 1 2 and 3, unless it is part of the test purpose to document the skills of students in a foreign language. However, the samples may be submitted in Swedish and Norwegian instead of Danish, unless it is part of the purpose of the test to document the skills of Danish.

Paragraph 2. The university can, by the way, where conditions allow students to take a sample in a foreign language. However, this does not apply if it is part of the purpose of the test to document skills in Danish or in a particular foreign language.

Paragraph 3. If the teaching of a subject has been conducted in a foreign language, the test in this language shall be tested in this language unless it is part of the purpose of trying to document the skills of students in a different language. The university can derogate from this rule.

Paragraph 4. In terms of training provided in English or in other foreign languages, the samples must be made in the tender language unless it is part of the test purpose to document the skills of students in a different language. The university can derogate from this rule.

§ 7. The university may offer special conditions for students with physical or mental function reduction and to students with a different mother tongue other than Danish when the university assesses that it is necessary to equate these students with others in : the test situation. It is a prerequisite that the proposal does not make a change to the level of the test.

§ 8. The university can conduct tests as a video conferencing or by other technical measures. The university must ensure that the security measures in connection with the conduct of such a test are equivalent to what is commonly applicable to the running of the sample. The university appoints or approves the supervisors who will be with the student during the test. Eksaminator and censor may be anywhere other than the student, but must examiners and give the assessment according to the applicable rules, by the way.

§ 9. The university sets rules on disciplinary measures in the event of exams and disruption in the examination of the examination.

§ 10. The university is able to establish rules on the use of computers in the study arrangements.

Retries abroad

§ 11. The university may conduct tests on a Danish representation or elsewhere abroad where it is justified that the student of practical or economic reasons cannot participate in the university tests in Denmark and when the student and the test site is in agreement. The conduct of Danish tests abroad must take place in accordance with the rules of the notice, by the way.

Paragraph 2. The university shall designate or approve the supervisors and other persons who shall be responsible for the conduct of the test abroad.

§ 12. The university is holding the special costs associated with the test being held abroad.

Paragraph 2. In the case of tests on Danish representations abroad, the notice of payment for service activities in the External Action Service shall apply.

Paragraph 3. The university is able to allow students wholly or partially to pay for the costs incurred by the university in connection with the examination of the test. It is a condition that the student, prior written notice, has declared its willingness to pay the relevant expenditure. The university may make the test the amount of the test the amount of prepaid.

Number of test trials

§ 13. A passed test can not be taken, cf. The report's announcement.

Paragraph 2. The student has three test trials to comprise a test, etc., cf. however, section 15 (3). 3, section 27, paragraph. 2, and section 28 (3). The university may allow further tests if exceptional circumstances are available. In the assessment of the existence of exceptional circumstances, the question of study may not be included.

Paragraph 3. A student who, in the second time, must have its tuition attendance, cf. Section 3, paragraph 3. 2, may request an audition instead. The university may, however, set out in the study scheme that this does not apply to the study type test, cf. § 27, paragraph. 3. Eductional participation, which assigns practical drills, cannot be replaced by a test.

Paragraph 4. A student's receipt of an offer of retrial in accordance with section 19 (1). 3, section 36, paragraph. 1, no. Paragraph 2, or section 41 (4). 1, no. 2, shall not be regarded as a test procedure in accordance with paragraph 1. 2.

Enrollment for samples

§ 14. Enrollment in the subject of the studies and qualifications of the bachelor and candidate courses shall be subject to rules laid down in the notice of the universities and graduates in the universities (training notice). The student is automatically registered for the test or the samples when the student is enrolled in a class or professional element for which one or more samples are attached. Frame cannot take place and an attempt was made, cf. Section 13 (1). 2 if the student is not participating in the test, unless the university has been dispensed in accordance with paragraph 1. 3. The student does not refit the preconditions of the university to participate in the test, cf. Section 3, paragraph 3. 2 and 3 have been used for testing, cf. Section 13 (1). 2, unless the university has been dispensed in accordance with paragraph 1. 3.

Paragraph 2. When the university has set a deadline for the Candidate Special, cf. The educational notice is not able to be carried out, and a test sample has been used, cf. Section 13 (1). 2 if the student does not deliver the specialty within the agreed time limit, unless the university has been dispensed in accordance with paragraph 1. 3.

Paragraph 3. The university may dispensers from the rules laid down in paragraph 1. 1 and 2 if exceptional circumstances are available. At the same time, the university can automatically enroll a student to a new trial.

Paragraph 4. The university provides for the enrollment and enrollment of studies for students engaged in a degree of undergrad training and for students accepted on a master training and other Part-time training.

First-season test of undergraduate studies

§ 15. The university is established in the study for undergraduate training, which tests the student must attend before the end of the first study year after study test (first-year test). The student must, by the end of the student year ' s other study year after study test, must be at the latest, before the end of the study study, cf. however, paragraph 1 Two, in order for the student to continue training.

Paragraph 2. The university can set out in the school scheme that the first-year test must be passed before the end of the first study year after study test so that students can continue training.

Paragraph 3. The provisions of paragraph 1. 1 and 2 shall apply regardless of whether or not the student has performed three test trials, cf. Section 13 (1). 2.

§ 16. In the case of undergraduations, the beginning of 1. September, the result of the first test trial, cf. section 15, most recently notified to the student before 1. August the following year. However, if the ordinary test has not been passed, the student is automatically enrolled into circulation in the same examination, but not later than August, and the result must be notified to the student by the end of September at the latest.

Paragraph 2. In the case of undergraduations, the beginning of 1. February, the result of the first test trial, cf. Section 15, have been notified to the student before 1. Feb the following year.

§ 17. The university may dispense with the time limits set out in sections 15 and 16 if exceptional circumstances are available.

Ompasses

§ 18. Where qualifications are held at the end of the autumn sseus, students who have not passed the ordinary test shall be automatically enrolled for retrial (2. test samples) in the same examination or in the immediate extension, but not later than February. Where qualifications are examined at the end of the spring session, students who have not passed the ordinary test shall be automatically enrolled for retrial (2. test samples) in the same examination or in the immediate extension, but not later than in August. Frame cannot take place and an attempt was made, cf. Section 13 (1). 2 if the student is not participating in the test, unless the university has been dispensed in accordance with paragraph 1. 8.

Paragraph 2. In education, where there are more exams of degrees than in paragraph 1. 1, students who have not passed the ordinary trial shall be automatically enrolled for retrial (2. trials shall be tested as soon as possible, but not later than six months after the test of the ordinary test. Frame cannot take place and an attempt was made, cf. Section 13 (1). 2 if the student is not participating in the test, unless the university has been dispensed in accordance with paragraph 1. 8.

Paragraph 3. The university derogates from the rules to be automatically enrolled for retrial (2. trials, if the university does not allow students to comply with the requirements laid down in section 3 (3). 2 and 3, before 2. Test trials shall be held. The university is going to report to the student to the 2nd. Trial testing.

Paragraph 4. In those cases where the enrollment of a subject presupms that a previous profession has been implemented and passed (professional progression), the student who has not passed 1. and 2. test sample, automatically enrolled for the next ordinary test (3). Test trials) in the foregoing business. Report to 3. test trials may not be carried out unless the university has been dispensed in accordance with paragraph 1. The university must ensure that 3. test in the pretentuary, prior to the ordinary test in the later profession.

Paragraph 5. The student has not passed a retrial, which shall be held in accordance with the rules laid down in paragraph 1. 1 and 2 or not participate in a retrial, cf. paragraph 3, the student must be given the opportunity to participate in the next ordinary test.

Paragraph 6. It may be fixed in the study scheme that the sample has a different test or assessment form other than the ordinary test, cf. Section 3, paragraph 3. One, section 20. However, this does not apply to the undergraduate project, the candidate specialist or the master project.

Paragraph 7. This can be set out in the study regime, when the student at the latest must take part in 3. trials in a subject that no longer be offered.

Paragraph 8. The university may dispensers from the rules on participation and automatic registration for samples and tests, cf. paragraph 1-4, if there are any unusual circumstances. The university can at the same time automatically enroll a student to a new test trial (1. or 2. Test trials).

Error or missing at the test m.v.

§ 19. If the university of a test is aware of errors and shortcomings, the university may, where appropriate, be taken from the person responsible or those responsible for the sample, decide on how the failure or the lack of assistance can be remedied.

Paragraph 2. In the absence of a particularly serious nature or where it may be considered the most appropriate method of correcting the failure or the lack thereof, the university may cancel the test and arrange an extraordinary retrial.

Paragraph 3. In other material errors and deficiencies other than those referred to in paragraph 1. Two said the university can make an offer of an extraordinary retrial. In this case, the tender must be given to all students whose test is suffering from that error or a lack of a test. A student who has participated in the extraordinary retrial may choose to retain the initial assessment given.

Chapter 4

The assessment and so forth.

20. The samples are either internal or external.

Paragraph 2. In the case of internal tests, the assessment of one or more sub-viewers (exams) has been appointed by the university of the teachers at the university.

Paragraph 3. For external tests, the assessment shall be carried out by one or more examiners and one or more censors, which are set by the Governing Committee for the Higher Educational, cf. Section II on censorship.

Paragraph 4. The external auditories must cover the main areas of education, including undergraduates, candidate specialises and master project. At least 1/3 of an EU Credit Transfer System (ECTS) point (European Credit Transfer System) will be documented at external tests. However, it does not apply to merit; tests, cf. § 32.

Paragraph 5. The assessment of a student ' s educational participation, cf. Section 3, paragraph 3. 2, shall be carried out by the sub-victor at that class.

§ 21. Censor and examiner shall, during the voting, take notes on the performance and the nature of the report for the processing of any appeal proceedings. The notes must be kept for at least one year and, in addition to any appeal proceedings, have been completed.

§ 22. When a test has begun, a judgment must be given unless the test is interrupted because of illness which entitles to retrial, cf. however, paragraph 1 Two and three.

Paragraph 2. If a test is broken, no assessment shall be given and the student has used a test sample, cf. Section 13 (1). 2.

Paragraph 3. If a submitted written task response does not meet the individualization requirements, cf. Section 4 (4). 3, or requirements laid down in the study scheme, the university may refuse to reply to the task. If the task response is rejected, an assessment must not be given and the student has used a test sample, cf. Section 13 (1). 2.

-23. Assessment is given in accordance with the 7-step scale or the assessment "passed" or "Not passed" or "Not Approved" or "Not Approved", cf. The report's announcement. The bachelor project, master's and master project is judged by the 7-step scale. For education participation, etc., cf. Section 3, paragraph 3. 2, the assessment shall be given "passed" or "passed" or "Not passed" or "Approved" or "Not Approved".

Paragraph 2. The assessment "passed" or "Unpassed" or "Not Accepted" or "Not Accepted" or "Not approved" can be used only for samples covering one-third of the ECTS-points training point. However, it does not apply to merit; tests, cf. § 32.

§ 24. In the assessment of the understudy, master design, master project and other major written tasks, the technical content must also be attached to the spelling and formulation of the students in accordance with the technical nature. § 6. In the case of study, the rules on the formulation and wording of the wording are included in the overall assessment of the examination performance, in the case of professional content, which is weighted in the first place unless the factorment or trade is language or foreign language.

Paragraph 2. The bachelor project, master's and master project, must be provided with a summary in a foreign language. If the understudy, master or master project is written in a foreign language, except for Norwegian and Swedish, the summary may be written in Danish. The study arrangements shall be determined how the summary is included in the overall assessment of the examination performance and the language of which the summary may or should be written.

Paragraph 3. The university can dispensers from paragraph 1. 1 for students documenting a relevant specific reduction, unless the spell and wording of the test is an essential part of the purpose of the test.

§ 25. The university can lay down rules for printing and converting price tasks.

Paragraph 2. The university can establish, for the individual training, that a price task can be converted to a specialty. A price tag that's got gold medal is converted to the grade 12.

Message of the assessment

SECTION 26. When the evaluation does not be notified to students immediately after the test, the university shall determine a date when the assessment will be notified to the student.

Paragraph 2. The date of paragraph 1. 1 shall be within four weeks of the holding, cf. ; however, section 16, and shall be notified to the student at the same time as the notice of the examination of the test shall be either in a disclosed or otherwise. In the calculation of the four weeks of the month of July, no.

Paragraph 3. However, for undergraduate oractic, Candidate Species and Master Project, the assessment must be notified no later than two months after the project or the specialty has been submitted for assessment. In the calculation of the two months, July is not part of the month.

Paragraph 4. The university may derogate from the one in paragraph 1. 1-3 fixed time limit if there are special circumstances. If the assessment cannot be carried out on the date, then the university must inform the student accordingly as soon as possible, with a reason and an indication of when the assessment will be notified.

Chapter 5

Special tests

Studiestarc test at undergraduate studies

§ 27. The university may decide that students in a undergraduate training must participate in and pass a study test to continue training, cf. Bachelor's announcement. The Studiestarg is designed to clarify whether or not the student has actually started training. The test is internal, cf. Section 20 (2). 2, and the assessment shall be given "Approved" or "Not Approved", cf. The report's announcement.

Paragraph 2. The study test must be held within two months of the study of the study, and the result must be notified to the student within two weeks of the examination of the test. If the test has not been passed, the student has the opportunity to participate in a retrial, which is to be held within three months of the study of the training study. The student has two test trials to pass the study test.

Paragraph 3. In the event of a study study of undergraduer training, the university rules on the study test sample in the study scheme, including the shape, content and time of the test.

Paragraph 4. The university can dispensers from paragraph 1. 1 and 2 if exceptional circumstances are available.

Paragraph 5. Chapter 8 does not apply to the study test type. If the university receives a complaint against the student body test, the university shall take a decision which may be brought to the Standing Committee for Educational Training when the complaint relates to legal issues, cf. § 48.

Complementary samples after admission to candidate education

§ 28. Students of a candidate training to carry out additional training activities, cf. the training announcement shall, within six months of the study test, participate in and pass on or pass the tests included in the additional training activity in order to be able to continue training, cf. the candidate access notice. The test or the samples must prove that the student has acquired the necessary technical preconditions for continued inclusion in candidate education.

Paragraph 2. The student has three trials to pass the test or the samples included in the additional training activity, except where the university has stipulate that the student has only 1 or 2 test trials, cf. paragraph 3.

Paragraph 3. The university is set out in the study scheme for tests forming part of complementary training activity, including number of test trials.

Paragraph 4. The university can dispensers from paragraph 1. 1-3, if there are any unusual circumstances.

Chapter 6

Requirements for the study system

§ 29. The study system for the individual training shall be fixed as follows :

1) Rules on test forms, including if any student may be able to choose between several test forms and, where appropriate, a requirement to participate in the teaching and the delivery of written task responses, cf. Section 3, paragraph 3. 1-3.

2) Rules on individual samples and group samples, including how many students may participate most in a group test whether the student's ability to select an individual sample, see it in accordance with : Section 4 (4). 1, and the individualisation of written task responses, cf. Section 4 (4). 3.

3) Rules on the language of diplomas, cf. § 6.

4) Any rules concerning the special conditions for students, cf. § 7.

5) Any rules on the use of the computer in the samples, cf. § 10.

6) Enrolling enrollment and enrollment of samples, cf. § 14.

7) Rules on the location of the tests in the training process, including which tests the student must participate before the end of the first study year of undergraduate training, cf. § 15.

8) Any rules that the first-year test must be passed before the end of the first year of study, cf. Section 15 (3). 2.

9) Rules on retrial, etc., cf. § 18.

10) Any rules on when the student shall be participating in 3. test, cf. Section 18 (2). 7.

11) Rules for which tests are external, cf. Section 20 (2). 4.

12) Rules on the tests on which of the samples are given and by which tests are given "passed" or "passed" or "Not passed", or "Approved" or "Not Approved", cf. -23.

13) Rules on how the spelling and formulation of the students are included in the overall evaluation of the examination performance, cf. section 24 (2). 1.

14) Rules on how the summary is included in the assessment and which language the summary can or must be written on, cf. section 24 (2). 2.

15) Rules on subtests, confession, examinations, etc., cf. Chapter 3 of the grade notice.

16) Any rules on the study test on undergraduate training, cf. § 27.

17) Any rules for testing on candidate training, which are included in additional training activity, including number of test trials, cf. § 28.

Paragraph 2. It must be stated in the study of the study that, if there are exceptional circumstances, the university may dispense with the rules laid down in the course of the study, which alone is set by the university.

Orientation of students on diplomas

-$30. It is the responsibility of the university to inform and guide students on the qualifications of qualifications that apply to individual training.

Chapter 7

Examination and so on.

§ 31. The university is issuing diplomas for completed training, cf. paragraph 2. The proof must have been submitted to the completed trained within two months after the assessment of the final test has been announced. In the calculation of the two months, July is not part of the month.

Paragraph 2. The proof shall be made in Danish, cf. however, paragraph 1 4, and must indicate at least :

1) The name and the CPR number or other equivalent unique identification number of the completed name.

2) The name of the university.

3) The term of education gives the right to the Danish / Latin and English language.

4) The noring of the training in ECTS points, including any propedide-to-class education.

5) What a degree of undergraduate education or training is the basis for candidate training.

6) The technical elements included in the training and tested in or otherwise documented, indicating the scope of ECTS points.

7) Merittransferred tests, cf. § 32.

8) The language of the satias if the test has been placed in a foreign language, cf. § 6.

9) Assessments achieved, cf. Section 23, paragraph 1. 1 and, if applicable, the average of the overall degree of examination, cf. The report's announcement.

10) A skill profile that describes the training.

Paragraph 3. The graduates can demand that the diplomas be drafted in English.

Paragraph 4. As an Annex to the diploma, the university shall issue an English language Diploma Supplement in accordance with the model developed on the basis of the standard model of the European Commission, the Council of Europe and the CEPES model, which describes the training of training ; the professional direction, content, level and objective, and provide information about the university and the location of the information and training in the Danish education system.

Paragraph 5. The proof may not contain information on any particular test terms, cf. section 7 and section 24 (4). 3.

Paragraph 6. The evidence does not contain information about the study test on undergraduate studies, cf. section 27, or whether supplemental tests on candidate training, cf. § 28.

Paragraph 7. The total evidence of an education carried out by several universities and, where appropriate, other educational establishments, shall be issued by the university in which the student is last recorded and written to the degree in question.

Paragraph 8. If the student is in training without having implemented it, the university shall issue the student documentation on the appropriate part of the training indicated in the ECTS points. The university is issued on the occasion of the student documentation of the alleged supplementary tests on candidate training, cf. § 28.

§ 32. Has the university approved that a qualified profession or trade union from a Danish or foreign higher education institution is transferred, must be passed the assessment as "passed" or "Approved". If the relevant professional element is assessed after the 7-step scale at both educational establishments, the assessment is carried forward with a grade. If a trade or trade element has been carried out by a foreign training institution, it shall be stated in an annex to the diploma which is the nature of the character scale used for this institution and a summary of the character of the report ; the character scale used.

§ 33. The university shall keep the information necessary to issue evidence for 30 years after the end of the test or the test. The information shall be delivered to the State Archives.

Chapter 8

Complations of samples, etc.

§ 34. The storage of samples or other assessment, which is part of the examination, shall be submitted by the student to the university. The complaint shall be written and substantiated.

Paragraph 2. The complaint must be submitted within two weeks of notification of the evaluation. However, the deadline shall not run the earliest date from the date indicated for the notification of the assessment, cf. SECTION 26.

Paragraph 3. The university may dispensers from the time limit laid down in paragraph 1. 2 if exceptional conditions exist.

$35. Among other things, the following may be complained :

1) Legal question.

2) The base (question, tasks and the like of the case).

3) The test process.

4) The judgmental.

Paragraph 2. If the complaint relates to the assessment or other matters relating to the assessment, the university shall immediately submit the complaint to the assessment, which has a deadline of 2 weeks to submit an opinion on the assessment and so forth in the complaint. The university may decide that the evaluation will have a longer period if there are special circumstances. In the calculation of the due date of the evaluation, no July shall be included The complainant must be given the opportunity to comment on the opinion of the assessors within a period of at least 1 week.

Paragraph 3. The university shall take a decision in accordance with paragraph 1. 1, cf. paragraph 2, on the basis of the opinion of the assessors and the complainant of the opinion.

Paragraph 4. If the university is to be treated in connection with the treatment of a complaint, attention is paid to errors or deficiencies in a test, the rules shall apply in section 19.

§ 36. The decision of the university to be written and reasoned may go on the basis of

1) the proposal for a new assessment (reassessment), but not by oral samples,

2) test for a new sample (retrial), or

3) the complainant will not be included in the complaint.

Paragraph 2. The university must, as soon as possible, give the complainant and the judges, cf. § 35, paragraph. 2, notification of the decision. If the decision is made on the quoting or retrial tender, the complainant shall be informed that a lower level of judgment may result in a change or sample.

§ 37. The complainant shall not later than two weeks after the decision of the university has been notified to the complainant, accept the quotation or retrial offer. Reevaluation or retrial must be carried out as soon as possible. If the diploma has been issued, cf. Section 31 (1). 1, the university must withdraw the certificate until the assessment is available and, where appropriate, issue a new evidence.

Paragraph 2. In the case of reevaluation and re-examination, new examiners of the university and any censors are designated, cf. § 61, paragraph 1. 1, no. 4, by the censor-foreman.

Paragraph 3. In judgment, the assessment must have presented the case files, including the task, the response, the complainant, the original judgment, the comments of the complainant and the decision of the university.

Paragraph 4. The assessment and retrial of the assessment, which may result in a lower grade, shall be communicated to the university of the assessment. In the case of a reevaluation of the written examination, the assessment shall be attached to a written justification for the assessment. The assessment and retrial of the assessment may not be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. however, section 44 (3). 1.

Recognizers

§ 38. A complaint that has not been included in the complaint, cf. § 36, paragraph. 1, no. 3, may bring the decision of the university to professional matters, cf. § 35, paragraph. 1, no. Two-four, for one of the University set up, set up a set of anime, cf. Clause 39, which makes a decision.

Paragraph 2. The plaintiff is making the appeal to the university. The Anken must be written and reasoned.

Paragraph 3. The application shall be submitted within two weeks of its decision to the complainant of the decision.

Paragraph 4. The university may dispensers from the time limit referred to in paragraph 1. 3 if exceptional conditions exist.

§ 39. The university is setting a stove as soon as possible after the submission of an appeal. Permanent recognition may be reduced.

Paragraph 2. The Board is composed of two-class censors, an examination of qualifications and a student in the field of professional expertise.

Paragraph 3. The CensorChato, cf. § 51, paragraph. 1, identify the two censors. The censorchair shall appoint one of the censores of the Board of Chairperson. The Censorforeman may appoint himself as a censor or as chairman.

Paragraph 4. The university appoints the vice-visor and the student.

Paragraph 5. The company ' s activities shall be subject to the administrative act, including the rules on inhability and professional secrecy.

§ 40. In order for the Board of the Board to be able to act as a quorum, all members of the Board shall participate in the discussion, and all the files of the proceedings shall be sent to all members. The discussion may take place in writing, including electronic, if there is a consensus among the members of the jury in writing, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the report. however, paragraph 1 2. The debate must be carried out in such a way as to protect the personal data of the complainant (confidential communications).

Paragraph 2. If consensus cannot be reached in the report, the discussion will be closed at a meeting in which all the members of the Board should be present. If we are to put a vote to the vote, and there is vocal equality, the President's vote will be the same as it is.

Paragraph 3. The Board of Appeal shall decide on paragraph 1. 1, cf. paragraph Two, on the basis of the material which was based on the decision of the university and on the basis of the reasoned appeal.

Paragraph 4. In the course of the treatment of an appeal, the Board of Indicators shall be aware of errors or deficiencies in an attempt to inform the university, and the rules laid down in section 19 shall apply.

§ 41. The decision of the akeneset net which shall be written and reasoned may go on the basis of

1) a new assessment of the assessment (reevaluation) by new asses-however, not by oral samples ;

2) new test sample (retry) by new asses; or

3) the complainant will not be included in the complaint.

Paragraph 2. Rating and retry are subject to rules in section 37, and the assessment cannot be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. however, section 44 (3). 1.

§ 42. The decision of the anchaeer shall be notified to the university as soon as possible and within two months of the date of submission of the appeal. In the calculation of the two months, July is not part of the month.

Paragraph 2. The appeal may not be admissible within the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article. The university must inform the complainant as soon as possible, with a justification and information on when the request is expected to be completed.

§ 43. The university shall notify the complainant as soon as possible of the declaration of the inane. If the decision is made on the quoting or retrial tender, the complainant shall be informed that a lower level of judgment may result in a change or sample.

Paragraph 2. The decision of the applicant may not be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. however, section 44 (3). 1.

§ 44. Complaguing the decisions taken pursuant to section 35 (3). 3, section 37, paragraph. 4, or section 40 (4). 3, may be brought to the university if the complaint relates to legal matters.

Paragraph 2. The complaint shall be submitted to the university no later than two weeks after the decision has been notified to the student.

Paragraph 3. The university can dispensers from paragraph 1. 2 if exceptional conditions exist.

Paragraph 4. The university decision in accordance with paragraph 1. 1 may be submitted for the Governing Committee of the Higher Educational Informers, cf. § 48.

Chapter 9

Other Rules

§ 45. The university must respect the intangible right of students ' intangible rights to produce results, products and the like that appear in the context of a test.

Paragraph 2. If the test process includes parties outside the university, including undertakings, institutions, etc., it is agreed between the university, the student and the third party to what extent the university, the student or third party, under the respect of, the applicable immaterial legal rules shall be entitled to use the results, products and similar products which are subject to the test flow, including any information relating to the third party's circumstances, which appear in the task, shall be published.

§ 46. Students may continue training during the examination by the university of a complaint or appeal proceedings in accordance with Chapter 8.

§ 47. The governance of the Higher Educational Committee may dispensers from the rules of the notice in section I of the examination for reasons of exceptional circumstances.

Complages of the university decisions

§ 48. The final decisions of the College of the College of Experts in this Order shall be subject to the Governing Committee ' s Governing Committee (s) in respect of the Member State ' s decision (s) when the complaint relates to legal matters. The deadline for filing a complaint is two weeks from the date on which the decision has been announced.

Paragraph 2. The appeal shall be submitted to the university issuing a statement. The complainant shall have the opportunity to comment on the opinion of the university within a period of at least 1 week. The university sends the complaint to the Board attached to the statement and any comments made by the complainant.

TITLE II

Censorship

Chapter 10

Censorcorps

§ 49. The governance of the Higher education system is a national corps of censors (censors of censors of censors).

Paragraph 2. A censorship includes undergraduate and master training and master training and second subgeneration according to the university law in the same professional or related area, as one or more universities have been approved to offer. For the humanist, natural sciences and social sciences, which consist of a core subject, cf. However, the educational announcement may be set up for each subject.

Paragraph 3. Before an education or a central subject is approved by the Minister, cf. The rules governing the accreditation of higher education establishments shall determine the management of the Higher Educational Educational Training Centre, which shall be attached to the training or the censorship of the centre for training or the core subject.

Paragraph 4. A list of censorcorps is available on the Ministry of Research, Innovation and the Higher Education Ministeria.

$50. The Censorcorps must be set up as such,

1) the overall corps covers all the subject or trade union elements included in the training or core classes, and the areas of employment which are intended to be taken by the training courses ;

2) that a person has their main employment outside the universities in one of the areas of employment, the training of education, and the aim of which is to do so.

3) an equitable distribution of female and male censors is sought ; and

4) where appropriate, centre-range centres associated with foreign universities are included in the field of training or central classes.

§ 51. For each center corps selected by and among the censores, cf. Chapter 11, a presidency consisting of a censoreman and one or more Vice-Presidents. The previous censorrotor held the elections.

Paragraph 2. The Censorchair represents the censores in the centre corps with regard to the universities and to the Higher Educational Educational.

Paragraph 3. The new Censoroffice will inform the universities of the universities and the Commission for the selection of the elections after paragraph 1. 1.

Paragraph 4. In the shape of new censorcorps, cf. § 49, paragraph. Paragraph 1 shall be provided for in paragraph 1. 1, and Section 58 (3). 1st, first time of university or university colleges.

§ 52. The Censorship Chain Chain shall, after consulting with university or universities, be censorship among censorship among the censors in the centre for the censorship, cf. however, section 58 (3). 4. The CensorChain Chain-Chair Distributes the CIs, so that the censors and at least every two years are allocated for the censories. Where the Centre shall cover more universities, the censorship shall be assigned to the centre as far as possible in more than one university during the time of the beck-period, cf. § 58, paragraph. In the case of distribution, account shall be taken of any particular prerequisites regarding the professional authority of the censor for the individual tests.

Paragraph 2. The Censorship Presidency must be in the performance of quality assurance of the test and degrees of training courses of education ;

1) suspend censors for the shape, cf. § 58, paragraph. 1,

2) advise the universities of the form and content of the samples, cf. § 61, paragraph 1. 1, no. 2,

3) submit an annual report to the universities on the basis of the reports reported, cf. § 61, paragraph 1. 1, no. 3,

4) answer hearings on study schemes and major changes in the courses of study courses which affect the audits and diplomas, and

5) be available to the university, including the marketing panels, for the development of new samples.

Paragraph 3. The CensorChair includes an ongoing dialogue on the quality of the tests and the quality of the examinations, including the quality of the qualifications, at least every other year to organise censorsessions with the censores in the centre and contact meetings between universities, including tape panels, and censores.

§ 53. The censorship must not be employed at the university or by the faculty if the university is divided into the main areas where they are to act as censors, unless they are in a different course of training or another major subject, cf. § 49, paragraph. Two, than the Censorship scientist and teaching. The university's executive board members, Headmaster, dekaner, institution leaders and others in similar positions cannot, however, act as a censor at the university. It must be avoided as far as possible to ensure that examiners perform censurodiversions for each other (Mutual censorship).

Paragraph 2. The activities of the censorers are subject to the administrative act, including the rules on inhability and professional secrecy.

§ 54. In the case of a censor where it has not been possible to call a censor, the university may designate a person as a censor who meets the requirements of section 57.

Paragraph 2. The University of the College shall, as soon as possible, be censored by the appointment as referred to in paragraph 1 1.

§ 55. The university creates websites where the members of the centre of the centre have access to up-to-date information on the training or key courses relevant to them, including this notice, the report and the study of the education system, and other material that is relevant to the activities of the censorship.

Paragraph 2. The university must provide the censories for the individual censuses with the material necessary to enable the censores to perform tasks.

§ 56. Universities cover the cost of the censor-presidency and censores, cf. The Danish Ministry's circular on hourly training and circular about the censored payment. Universities shall provide for administrative and practical assistance following prior agreement with its censoroffice.

Chapter 11

Censores

§ 57. In order to be appointed as censor, the person must have

1) a relevant research-based training on the candidate level,

2) detailed and up-to-date knowledge of the scientific disciplines of the professional area, including the theory and methods of the profession ;

3) specific competence within one or more areas of professional competence included in the training or the major class ; and

4) the current knowledge of the conditions of use of training or the central trade area, including knowledge of the situation and needs of the people.

§ 58. The governance of the Higher Education Committee is the censorship of the censorship of the censorship.

Paragraph 2. The CensorChain Council shall consult the universities before the setting takes account of the provisions of sections 50 and 57.

Paragraph 3. The Censorship shall be ordered for four years at a time, cf. however, paragraph 1 For each new processing period, at least one quarter of the censorship shall be replaced at a quarter of the censorship. Additional censors may be provided within the period, including in cases where new certified training must be associated with the centre for the centre, cf. § 49, paragraph. 3.

Paragraph 4. In exceptional cases, the Censorship can not be censored by censors for stand-alone censuropgifts.

Paragraph 5. Following a reasoned recommendation from the Censorship or a university, the Governing Preference Management may terminate the censorship of censorship before the end of the term, if the presidency or the university considers that a censor is not satisfactory.

$59. Censorsubjects are in the centre of proposals from the censorrotor, censorcorps, universities and in professional magazines, periodicals and so on.

§ 60. Censor has to be checked.

1) the requirements for the content of the training tests are in line with the objectives and other requirements laid down for training, including in the training notice and in study arrangements,

2) the tests are carried out in accordance with the applicable rules ; and

3) that the students receive a uniform and fair treatment that their performance is given a reliable assessment, in accordance with the rules of the report, in particular the rules laid down in the study arrangements for training ; and other rules for training.

§ 61. A censor must

1) act as a censor in the field of training or the external test of the central professional subject, cf. Section 20 (2). 3,

2) advise on the test system, including its form and content, and whether it works according to its purpose and in accordance with the objectives of the training or of the training centre and training of the training of the Member States ;

3) at the end of the examination certificate, a report on the degree of examination for the university and the Presidency, and

4) contribute to the processing of appeals and the anchors of samples, cf. § 35, paragraph. 2, section 37, paragraph. 2, and section 39, paragraph 1. 2.

Paragraph 2. Replacing the censor of the fact that the conditions referred to in Clause 60 are not met or are given a censor of material problems or shortcomings in the university's intake of an education, the Centre shall issue the report to the university with a copy of The censordid presidency.

TITLE III

Entry into force and transitional provisions

Chapter 12

Entry into force and transitional provisions

§ 62. The announcement shall enter into force on 1. January 2014, and has effect from 1. September, 2014, cf. however, paragraph 1 2.

Paragraph 2. Section 14 has effect from 1. July 2014 for students ' enrolment for subjects or professional elements and associated tests for study of the year 2014-15 or later. The university can automatically enroll students to one. and 2. test results if a student in previous school years has been enrolled in trade or trade union elements without participating in or comprise the corresponding tests.

Paragraph 3. Publication no. 666 of 24. June 2012 on the degree and censorship at university education (diplomas) is hereby repealed on 1. September, 2014.

§ 63. The following notices shall be repealed on 1. April 2014 :

1) Publication no. 557 of 21. August 1987 on censorship and complainants of examinations at Denmark's Library School, and

2) Publication no. 409 of 27. May 1999 on the examination of complaints about the examination of the examination by Denmark's Librarian school, cf. however, paragraph 1 2.

Paragraph 2. Publication no. 409 of 27. In May 1999 on the examination of the examination of the examination of the examination of the examination by Denmark's Libraries, the test shall continue to apply to complaints of samples in which the sample is to be held before 1. April 2014.