Chapter 1	Scope and scope
Chapter 2	Organisation and planning
Chapter 3	Access to sample
Chapter 4	Specimens and organises
Chapter 5	Test Obsertion
Chapter 6	Censorcorps
Chapter 7	Censores
Chapter 8	Assessment
Chapter 9	Graduation certificates
Chapter 10	Error and missing on samples
Chapter 11	Complages of samples
Chapter 12	Complains of decisions taken by a training institution or a recognizance
Chapter 13	Other Rules
Chapter 14	Entry into force and transitional provisions

Completion of the degree and censorship of higher-stage artistic studies under the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Higher Education and training

In accordance with section 10 (4), 1, 3 and 5, and section 15 (3). 2, in the Act of Higher Artistic Education institutions, cf. Law Order no. 465 of 8. May 2013, as amended by law no. 898 of 4. July 2013 :

Chapter 1

Scope and scope

§ 1. The announcement shall apply to the degree and censorship at the degree and training of qualifications and training for artistic work and master and diploma training and other part-time training, unless otherwise specified in the notice of : the training.

§ 2. The purpose of the examination is to assess the extent to which the student meets the technical objectives laid down for the training elements of training courses in the study scheme. The final test shall provide the basis for the issuance of diplomas.

Paragraph 2. The Education institution shall lay down in the study arrangements for the precise target descriptions and criteria for assessing the measurement of the individual training elements, which shall be concluded with a test. cf. Section 4 (4). 2.

Chapter 2

Organisation and planning

§ 3. The tests must be organised in order to document the degree of measurement of target information in relation to essential objectives and requirements.

§ 4. The training institution shall be responsible for making students aware of the objectives and requirements which are essential to the tests.

Paragraph 2. The institution of the Educational institution shall determine in the context of this notice and in accordance with the notice of training in the study arrangements applicable to the study of the study :

1) What samples, including partial samples included in the training and weighting of the characters given in each test sample.

2) Location of the tests in the training process.

3) Any rules on the study test test, cf. Section 9 (1). 4.

4) Obtaining sickness and retrial, cf. § § 6-9.

5) Fulfillment of the obligation to participate and the delivery of tasks and projects, etc., which are a prerequisite for participation in a test, cf. Section 5 (5). 2.

6) Sample forms, including requirements for response, cf. § 10.

7) The organisation of the tests as individual sample or group test, including the number of the sample, the ability of students to choose an individual sample rather than a group test and for the individualisation of a sample ; in written group response, cf. sections 11 and 12.

8) Samples that can be documented by participating in the instruction, cf. ~ 10 (1)) 2.

9) Use of auxiliary means, cf. § 15.

10) The language used for the test, cf. § 17.

11) Special test conditions, cf. § 18.

12) Working with your own and others ' works, cf. § 19.

13) Disciplinary measures in the event of exams and disturbance in the examination of the examination certificate, cf. § 19.

14) What tests that have external assessment, cf. § 35, paragraph. 3.

15) How the assessment of the study and spelling of the student is included in the overall assessment of the examination performance, cf. § 36, paragraph. 2.

16) Complages, cf. Chapter. 10.

Paragraph 3. The institution of the Education Foundation may derogate from what the institution itself has laid down in the study arrangements, if it is justified in exceptional circumstances.

Paragraph 4. The institution of the educational institution shall inform the students and the other instrumental tests on the test rules applicable to each training. The rules must be made available in the home of the training institution

Chapter 3

Access to sample

§ 5. Enrollment to a training element, semester, etc., at the same time, are enrolling to the corresponding tests.

Paragraph 2. In the course of the study, the Education Institute may provide that the fulfilment of the obligation to participate and the delivery of tasks and projects, etc., is a prerequisite for participation in a test.

Paragraph 3. Enrollment in accordance with paragraph 1. 1 is used for a test run. This does not, however, apply where the student is prevented from attending to disease, as defined in the case of disease. § 7.

Paragraph 4. The Education Institute may derogate from paragraph 1. One-three, when it's justified in exceptional circumstances.

§ 6. A passed test could not be taken. If there are several partial samples in a sample, any of the samples in which there has been no passed shall not be taken when the aggregate sample is passed unless otherwise specified in the notice or study scheme for training.

Paragraph 2. If a test has not been passed, the student continues to be registered for the test, cf. however, paragraph 1 3 and 8.

Paragraph 3. The student can participate three times in the same test. The institution of the Education Foundation may allow further testing if it is justified in exceptional circumstances. In the assessment of the existence of exceptional circumstances, the question of study may not be included.

Paragraph 4. A student's receipt of an offer of a re-trial in accordance with section 41 (4). 2, section 46, paragraph. 1, no. 2, or § 51 (3). 2, no. 2 is not considered to be the use of a test sample.

§ 7. A student who has been prevented from carrying out a test as a result of a proven disease or any other unforeseeable reason should be given the opportunity to submit the test as soon as possible. If it is a test that is located in the final examination of training, the student must be given the opportunity to take the test in the same examination or in the immediate extension.

Paragraph 2. If a number of parts of a sample are given where each part is given, the student can only audition in the part or parts of which have not been carried out unless otherwise followed by the rules on training. This also applies where the individual characters are counted together to one character for the aggregate sample.

Paragraph 3. Other special circumstances whereby a student is to be prevented from meeting to test may, after the specific assessment of the educational institution, be examined in accordance with paragraph 1. One and two.

§ 8. The educational institution shall lay down in the study arrangements for undergraduate training, which tests the student must participate before the end of the initial study year after study test (first-year test). The student must, by the end of the student year ' s other study year after study, must be at the latest, before the end of the student ' s second study, in order to allow students to continue training, cf. however, paragraph 1 2.

Paragraph 2. The institution of education may, in the school scheme, establish that the first-year test must be passed before the end of the first study year after study test so that the student can continue training.

Paragraph 3. The result of 1. test samples must be communicated to the student so that a possible retrial may take place in the same examination stermin.

Paragraph 4. Other requirements for a test as a condition for continuing training must be stated in the notice of the training, cf. However, section 9.

Paragraph 5. The institution of the Education Institute may, for the individual students, be dispensers from the dates laid down in order to pass the test or the tests referred to in paragraph 1. 1 if it is justified in maternity or unusual circumstances.

§ 9. The institution of the Education Institute may provide that students at the level of training must participate and consist of a study study test in order to continue training. The Studiestarg is designed to clarify whether or not the student has actually started training.

Paragraph 2. The study test must be held within two months of the study of the study, and the result must be notified to the student within two weeks of the examination of the test. If the test has not been passed, the student has the opportunity to participate in a retrial, which shall be held no later than three months after the study of study studies. The student has two attempts to pass the study test sample.

Paragraph 3. The Studiestartest has an internal assessment, cf. § 35, paragraph. 2, and will be judged by "passed" or "Not passed" respectively or "Approved" or "Not Accepted" respectively.

Paragraph 4. The education institution shall lay down rules on the study of study species test in the study arrangements, including the shape, content and time of the test.

Chapter 4

Specimens and organises

§ 10. The training shall contain a variation of sample forms to reflect the content and work forms of the notification. The sample must satisfy the purposes of each professional or professional element and may, for example, be oral, in writing, practical tests and the project-oriented flow and combinations of the various test forms.

Paragraph 2. The Education Institute may fix the course of the study, that a trade or trade element whose content and capacity is justified, in whole or in part, by requirements for participation in the teaching.

Paragraph 3. Unless otherwise specified in the notice of individual training, it shall be fixed in the study scheme, the specimen to be used for the individual sample. Any form of requirements for the response shall be shown on the study.

Paragraph 4. The institution of the Education Foundation may refuse a response if it fails to meet the requirements laid down ; if the response is rejected, a review shall not be given and the student has used a test sample, cf. Section 6 (2). 3.

§ 11. It shall be fixed in the study scheme, in the case of professional considerations, whether a test is organised as an individual sample or group test. At the same time, when a sample is organized as a group test, at the same time how many students may participate in the individual group test and whether or not the student can select an individual sample.

Paragraph 2. In the case of an individual sample as well as a group test, an individual assessment of the performance of students and the individual characters must be individually assessed.

§ 12. In an oral group, the individual students shall be examined in such a way as to ensure that an individual assessment of the study may be carried out.

Paragraph 2. When organising an oral group, it is necessary to ensure that the time allotted to the test shall be adjusted to the number of students participating in the test.

Paragraph 3. In a written task of writing which has been drawn up by several students, only an independent assessment may be given if the contribution of each student's contribution can be found. There is a requirement for the individualisation of the study system.

Paragraph 4. When a self-employed judgment is not given for a written task of writing which has been drawn up by several students, the task shall be included in the evaluation by a subsequent oral test.

Chapter 5

Test Obsertion

§ 13. Exorminations of oral and practical responses are public, cf. however, paragraph 1 2-4, unless they are covered by an agreement after paragraph 54 (1). 3.

Paragraph 2. The institution of the Education Foundation may derogate from the provision in paragraph 1. 1 if there are any exceptional circumstances, including where the reference to the student speaker shall be speaking. In addition, the educational institution may restrict access to the enclosure, for reasons of space, and individuals may be denied access or be expelled if necessary to ensure the necessary order of the test.

Paragraph 3. The other members of the group shall not be present in the enclosure until they are to be examined by the student by an individual oral test in the case of a group-produced product.

Paragraph 4. The sound and image recordings of a sample are not allowed unless the recordings are part of the test flow. The recording shall be made by the educational institution.

Paragraph 5. Only examiner and censor may be present during the deliberations on practical and oral tests, including oral defence of projects. The institution may, however, provide for future examiners to be able to be overvol..

§ 14. The Education Institute shall ensure that the tests are carried out under conditions suitable for the exclusion of students communicating unintentionally.

Paragraph 2. The Education Institute must ensure that students have appropriate working conditions in the tests.

Paragraph 3. The institution of the Education Institute may hold an oral response to the video conference or by other technical measures. The institution of the Education Foundation shall ensure that the security measures in connection with the holding of such a test are equivalent to what is commonly applicable to the execution of the sample. The institution of Education shall appoint or approve a supervisor to be at the student ' s examination. The examiner and the censor must be examiners and characters in accordance with applicable rules, by the way.

§ 15. The educational institution shall lay down in the study arrangements for the individual training rules for the use of auxiliary means, including electronic, during the tests, cf. however, paragraph 1 2.

Paragraph 2. The institution of the Education Institute may impose limits on access to use of electronic means of capacity for capacity.

§ 16. A test has started when the distribution of tasks has begun, when the preparation material or task title is handed to the student, or when the student has become familiar with the test question or the like.

Paragraph 2. A student who is late for a written test may only take part in the test if the educational institution considers it to be excluded that the person concerned may have received any information on the task and considers that the delay is justified. The test time can only be extended in exceptional cases.

Paragraph 3. A student who is late for an oral test may be offered an examination at a later date if the educational institution considers that the delay is reasonably justified.

§ 17. In the case of studies offered in Danish, the tests shall be made in Danish, cf. however, paragraph 1 2 and 3, unless it is part of each test being the purpose of documenting the skills of foreign languages. The samples may be submitted in Swedish or Norwegian instead of Danish, unless the purpose of the test is to document the skills of the student in Danish.

Paragraph 2. In the course of training or an individual subject to an English or other foreign language, the samples in this language shall be submitted in this language unless it is part of each test to document the skills of the student in a different language.

Paragraph 3. The educational institution may, by the way, where conditions allow a student who wishes to take a sample in a foreign language, unless the purpose of the test is to document the skills of the student in Danish.

§ 18. The institution of the Education institution shall offer special conditions for students with physical or mental function reduction, to students with similar difficulties and to students with a different mother tongue other than Danish when the institution assesses that ; are necessary to equate these students with others in the test situation. It is a prerequisite that the proposal does not make a change to the level of the test.

§ 19. A student who, during a test, provides or provides for another student improper assistance for the response to a task or not using any means of aid shall be expelled from the training institution from the sample.

Paragraph 2. Where, during or after a test, it shall be provided that a student has unduly obtained or provided assistance, published another person ' s work for his own or used previously condemned work without reference ; this shall be reported to : the educational institution. Will the request be confirmed, and the action has been given or could be given any significance for the assessment, the educational institution of the student body is suspended from the test.

Paragraph 3. If a student is to be disturbed, the educational institution can expel the student from the sample. In less serious cases, the institution of education only gives a warning.

Paragraph 4. The institution of the establishment may in the Member State referred to in paragraph 1 1-3 cases of circumcision referred to in a cumbent case may decide that the student is to be expelled from the institution of a shorter or extended period. In such cases, a written warning is given that repetition may result in permanent suspension.

Paragraph 5. A expulsion after a test of a paragraph to 3 shall mean that a possible nature of the sample is disposed of and that the student has used a test sample, cf. Section 6 (2). 3.

Paragraph 6. A student shall be required to confirm, by means of a written reply, with a signature which may be digital that the response is made out without irregular help, cf. paragraph One and two.

Retries abroad

20. The institution of the Education Institute may organise a Danish representation or elsewhere abroad where it is justified that the student of practical or economic reasons cannot participate in the institution's tests in Denmark and when the student body is in question ; and the test site is in agreement. The conduct of Danish tests abroad must take place in accordance with the rules of the notice, by the way.

Paragraph 2. The institution of the Education Foundation may be able to charge a person abroad to perform the practical conduct of the test.

§ 21. The institution of the Education Foundation shall keep the special costs incurred in connection with the examination of the test in foreign countries.

Paragraph 2. In the case of the holding of audits on Danish representations abroad, notice of payment for service activities in the foreign service shall apply.

Paragraph 3. The institution of the Education Institute may allow the student to pay in full or in part to the costs incurred by the institution in the examination of the test. It is a condition that, prior to writing, the student has declared its willingness to pay the expenditure in question on the basis of the estimated amount of the amount to be estimated at the expected size of the amount. The institution of the establishment may make the test the payment of the amount of the amount prepaid.

Chapter 6

Censorcorps

§ 22. The governance of the Higher Educational Committee is a national corps of censors. A censorship may cover more training if they are related, and the number of censors is undergoing it.

Paragraph 2. A censorship includes the training of qualifications and qualifications, training for artistic work and master and diploma training and second subgeneration training.

Paragraph 3. An overview of the censorcorps is available on the display for the Home Deer ' s Home Page.

-23. The Censorcorps must be set up as such,

1) the overall corps covers all the subject or professional areas included in the training and the areas of employment which the training is intended for ;

2) a person who has their principal employment outside the educational establishments of one of the areas of employment, education aims at both national and international levels ;

3) an equitable distribution of female and male censors is sought ; and

4) where appropriate, centre-range censors associated with foreign educational establishments.

§ 24. For each of the Censorries, a presidency consisting of a censorchair and one or more Vice-Presidents is chosen by the censores. The previous censorrotor held the elections.

Paragraph 2. The Censorchair represents the censores in the Centre for the Management Board and the educational institutions.

Paragraph 3. The new Censoroffice will inform the rectors of the educational institutions and the Management of the Higher Educational Educational Elements.

Paragraph 4. For the replacement of new censored corps, the function shall be provided for in paragraph 1. 1 and Section 31 the first time of the training institution or the educational establishments collectively.

§ 25. The Censorship Chain-Office shall, after consultation with the educational institution or the training establishments, be censoring among the censores in the centre for the censorship, cf. however, section 31 (1), 4. The CensorChain Chain-Chair Distributes the CIs, so that the censors and at least every three years are assigned the censortask tasks. Where the Centre shall cover more educational establishments, the censorship shall be assigned as far as possible to centre tasks by more than a training institution during the processing period. In the case of distribution, account shall be taken of any particular prerequisites regarding the professional authority of the censor for the individual tests.

Paragraph 2. The Censorship Presidency must be in the performance of quality assurance of the test and degrees of training courses of education ;

1) setting censors for a begument,

2) advise the educational establishments on the form and content of the samples,

3) submit an annual report to the educational establishments on the basis of the reports reported, cf. § 34, no. 3,

4) answer hearings on study schemes and major changes in the courses of study courses which affect the audits and diplomas, and

5) be available to the institution of training in the process of dismantling new samples.

Paragraph 3. The CensorChair includes an ongoing dialogue on the quality of the tests and the quality of the examinations, including the quality of the qualifications, at least every other year to organise censorsessions with the censores in the centre and contact meetings between The educational institutions and censores.

SECTION 26. The censorship must not be employed by the training institution, or by the department whose training institution is divided into the main areas where they are to act as a censor, except in the case of a different training other than the processor and / or teaches at. However, the institution's management board members, principal, institution leaders and others in similar positions, cannot, however, act as a censor to the educational institution. It must be avoided as far as possible to ensure that examiners perform censurodiversions for each other (Mutual censorship).

§ 27. In cases where it has not been possible to call for a censor, the institution of training may designate a person as a censor who meets the requirements of section 30.

Paragraph 2. The institution shall inform the office of the Member State of the establishment as soon as possible on the designation of paragraph 1. 1.

§ 28. On the website of the educational institution, members of the centre shall have access to up-to-date information on the education relevant to them, including this notice, the report on character scale and other assessment by certain Educational institutions of the Ministry of Culture (report (report) and student education system, as well as other material that is relevant to the activities of the censorship.

Paragraph 2. The institution of the Education Foundation must provide the censories for each individual censurop with the material needed to enable the censors to carry out the tasks.

§ 29. The educational establishments shall cover the cost of the centre-censoring and censoring operations, cf. The Danish Agency for Modernization on hourly pay and circular censorship for the censorship. By way of prior agreement with the censorsoroffice, the education institutions shall provide for administrative and practical assistance.

Chapter 7

Censores

-$30. In order to be appointed as censor, the person must have

1) detailed and current knowledge of the scientific and artistic disciplines of the specialized area, including the theory and methods of the profession ;

2) specific competence within one or more areas of trade union, which are included in the training ; and

3) current knowledge of the applications of education, including knowledge of the situation and needs of the people.

§ 31. The governance of the Higher Education Committee is the censorship of the censorship of the censorship.

Paragraph 2. The Censoroffice Council shall consult with the educational institutions before the setting takes account of the provisions of sections 23 and 30.

Paragraph 3. The Censorship shall be ordered for four years at a time, cf. however, paragraph 1 For each new processing period, at least one quarter of the censorship shall be replaced at a quarter of the censorship. Additional censors may be provided within the period, including in cases where specific knowledge and skills are needed, and if new approved courses are to be associated with the Centre ' s Centre.

Paragraph 4. In exceptional cases, the Censorship can not be censored by censors for stand-alone censuropgifts.

Paragraph 5. Following a reasoned recommendation from the censorship or a training institution, the Management Board may terminate the censorship of censorship before the end of the term, if the Presidency or the training institution finds that a The Centre ' s activities are not satisfactory.

§ 32. Censorsubjects are in the centre of proposals from the censorrotor, censoring corps, educational institutions, and in professional magazines, periodicals and so on.

§ 33. Censor has to be checked.

1) the requirements for the content of the training tests are in line with the objectives and other requirements laid down for training, including in the training notice and in study arrangements,

2) the tests are carried out in accordance with the applicable rules ; and

3) that the students receive a uniform and fair treatment that their performance is given a reliable assessment, in accordance with the rules of the report, in particular the rules laid down in the study arrangements for training ; and other rules for training.

§ 34. A censor must,

1) act as a censor on the external auditor of the training,

2) advise on the test system, including its form and content, and whether it works according to its purpose and in accordance with the objectives of the training and education,

3) at the end of the examination certificate, a report on the examination of qualifications to the educational institution and the Presidency, and

4) contribute to the processing of appeals and the anchors of samples.

Paragraph 2. Censor and examiner shall make notes on the performance and character setting for personal use in the preparation of a statement in a case on appeal. The notes must be kept for a period of one year.

Paragraph 3. The business of the censorship is subject to the administrative act.

Paragraph 4. Replacing the censor of the fact that the facts referred to in section 33 are not met or if the centre of training is subject to serious problems or deficiencies in the training of the educational institution of an education, the Centre ' s Centre ' s report shall be subject to the following : the educational institution with a copy of the centre for the centre.

Chapter 8

Assessment

$35. Samples have either internal or external assessment.

Paragraph 2. In the case of samples of internal assessment, the assessment shall be carried out by one or more teachers appointed by the training institution (exams).

Paragraph 3. In the case of an external assessment test, the examiner shall be assessed and by one or more censors that have been shifted by the Higher Educational Styles.

Paragraph 4. Tests with external assessment must cover the main areas of education, including undergraduates, candidate and master and diploma. At least one third of a degree of training achieved in ECTS points shall be documented for each student by external audits, unless there is a particular degree in the notification for each education.

Paragraph 5. Evaluation of student ' s education participation, cf. ~ 10 (1)) 2, shall be carried out by the sub-victor at that class.

§ 36. The basis of the assessment is the student's individual achievement. The assessment shall, by the way, be done according to the rules of the report on character scale and second assessment.

Paragraph 2. In addition to the technical content, the assessment of the understudy, the Candidate Species or the master and diploma must also attach importance to the study and spelling of the student's students. The institution of the Education Institute may dispense with students documenting an appropriate specific reduction in the function. It shall be laid down in the study scheme, the manner in which formulation and spelling power is included in the overall evaluation of the examination performance, cf. Section 4 (4). 2, no. 15 ; however, the professional content must be weights in the weakest. The formulation and spelling capacity may be included in the assessment of other tests.

Paragraph 3. All samples must be passed.

§ 37. When the evaluation is not notified to students immediately after the test, the educational institution shall fix a date in which the assessment will be notified. The date shall be communicated to students at the same time as the notice of the holding of the test, either by means of a split second or in any other way.

§ 38. Assessment is given in accordance with the 7-step scale or the assessment "passed" or "Not Accepted" respectively or "Approved" or "Not Accepted" respectively. The bachelor project, master and master's and master and diploma are judged by the seven-step scale. For education participation, etc., cf. ~ 10 (1)) 2, the assessment shall be given "passed" or "Not passed" respectively or "Approved" or "Not Accepted" respectively.

Paragraph 2. The assessment "passed" or "Unpassed" or "Approved" or "Not Accepted" may not be used at most for samples covering one-third of the ECTS-points training point. However, it does not apply to meritled tests.

Chapter 9

Graduation certificates

§ 39. The education institution is issuing diplomas for completed training.

Paragraph 2. The proof shall be made in Danish, cf. however, paragraph 1 For the following reasons, the following information shall be included :

1) The name and cpr of the final name. no. or other unique identification.

2) The issuing authority.

3) The term for which the training gives the right to Danish / Latin and English.

4) The individual training elements specified in ECTS points.

5) The training elements that are tested, indicating the assessments obtained and, if appropriate, by : average of the overall degree of examination.

6) They, on the other, documented training elements.

7) Merittransferred training elements and tests, where appropriate, with indication of the assessments obtained as "passed", "Approved" or a character according to the 7-step scale.

8) The language of the satias if the test has been placed on a foreign language, except for Norwegian and Swedish.

Paragraph 3. The graduates may also obtain his evidence drawn up in English.

Paragraph 4. As an annex to the certificate of higher education, the training institution shall issue the language of Diploma Diploma Supplement, which, in accordance with the model of the European Commission, the Council of Europe and UNESCO, has developed the standard model of training ; provide information on the institution and the position of its and its training in the Danish education system.

Paragraph 5. The proof may not contain information on any particular test terms, cf. § 18.

Paragraph 6. The proof must not contain information about the study test sample, cf. § 9.

Paragraph 7. The total evidence of an education carried out by several educational establishments shall be issued by the institution in which the student is last inscribe.

Paragraph 8. For students leaving education without completing it, the education institution shall issue the training establishment on the occasion of the student documentation of the graduates of training, for higher education as specified in ECTS points.

§ 40. The institution of the Education institution shall keep the information necessary to issue evidence for 30 years after the end of the test or the test. Then they are handed over the information to the State Archives.

Paragraph 2. Where a training institution is to exist or for any other reason, the documents shall not be retained in accordance with paragraph 1. 1, the institution shall ensure the second reassuring storage of the relevant rules.

Chapter 10

Error and missing on samples

§ 41. If the educational institution is to be tested in the context of a test of flaws which may be remedied, the institution may take the institution, possibly after discussion with the assessment or to the task (s), a decision on how the demission is to be carried out.

Paragraph 2. For significant errors and deficiencies, the training institution offers a reevaluation or re-trial. The offer shall apply to all of the examiner tests whose tests are suffering from the same defects and deficiencies.

Paragraph 3. In the case of errors and deficiencies of a particularly serious nature, the educational institution may decide to cancel the already held test and to organise a re-trial.

§ 42. Circulation and retrial as referred to in section 41 (1). 2, cannot result in a lower character. Ompbutts caused by cancellation of the initial test, cf. § 41, paragraph. 3 may result in a lower character.

Paragraph 2. The education institution can withhold diplomas, cf. $39, until the case is settled.

Chapter 11

Complages of samples

§ 43. Complagues of samples shall be submitted individually by the student body to the training institution. The complaint shall be written and substantiated.

Paragraph 2. The appeal shall be submitted within two weeks of the notification of the test. The institution of the Education Foundation may dispense from the deadline where unusual conditions are undergoing it.

§ 44. Students may continue to be trained under the treatment of the appeal, except where the other is stated in the notice or in accordance with the notice.

§ 45. The complaint may concern :

1) Legal question.

2) The base of the base, including test subjects, tasks and equal.

3) The test process.

4) The judgmental.

Paragraph 2. Where the complaint relates to the assessment or other matters relating to the assessment, the institution of training shall immediately submit the complaint to the assessment, which shall have a period of normally 2 weeks to make a statement. The judges will have to comment on the technical issues in the complaint. The student must have the opportunity to comment on the opinions within a period of normally 1 week.

Paragraph 3. The institution shall determine the complaint on the basis of the opinion of the assessors and the student's comments on the opinion.

§ 46. The decision to be written and reasoned may go out on :

1) However, a new assessment is made (rethink), not by oral tests.

2) Quotation for new sample (retry).

3) That the student does not have a meddle in the complaint.

Paragraph 2. The institution of Education must immediately give the student and the judges a statement of the decision. If the decision is made on the quoting or re-examination offer, the student must be informed that a lower level of judgment may result in a change or circumtest.

§ 47. Acceptance of quotes or retrial quotes shall be carried out within two weeks of the date of notification of the decision. Reevaluation or re-examination must be carried out as soon as possible. If the diploma has been issued, cf. Section 39, shall suspend the certificate until the assessment is available and, if necessary, issue a new evidence.

Paragraph 2. The new examiners of the educational institution and any censors of the censorship shall be assessed by reevaluation and re-examination.

Paragraph 3. In judgment, the assessment must have presented the case files, including the task, the response, the complainant, the opinions of the initial assessments, the comments of the complainant and the decision of the institution of education.

Paragraph 4. The assessment and re-examination shall be notified to the educational institution of the assessment. In the case of a reevaluation of the written examination, the assessment shall be attached to a written justification for the assessment. The assessment and retrial of the assessment may not be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. However, § 53.

Paragraph 5. Ompasses and reevaluation may result in a lower grade.

Anke and Decision

§ 48. A complaint that has not been included in the complaint, cf. § 46, paragraph. 1, no. 3, may bring the institution ' s decision to a professional nature, cf. Section 45 (3). 1, no. 2-4, for one of the institution set up, set up as a whole, cf. Clause 49, that makes a decision.

Paragraph 2. The student is giving the appeal to the institution of education. The Anken must be written and reasoned.

Paragraph 3. The application shall be submitted within two weeks of the fact that the student has been made aware of the decision of the educational institution.

Paragraph 4. The institution of the Education Foundation may dispense from the deadline where unusual conditions are undergoing it.

§ 49. The institution of the Education Foundation shall set a device name as soon as possible after the submission of an appeal. Permanent recognition may be reduced. The Education institution shall hold the charge to a stove.

Paragraph 2. The Board is composed of two-class censors, an examination of qualifications and a student in the field of professional expertise.

Paragraph 3. The censorship of the Censorship shall appoint the two The censorchair shall appoint one of the censores of the Board of Chairperson. The Censorforeman may appoint himself as a censor or as chairman.

Paragraph 4. The institution of the Education Institute shall appoint the examiner-eligible teacher and the student.

Paragraph 5. The company ' s activities shall be subject to the administrative act.

$50. In order for the Board of the Board to be able to act as a quorum, all members of the Board shall participate in the discussion and all the files of the proceedings shall be sent to all members. The discussion may take place in writing, including electronic, if there is a consensus among the members of the jury in writing, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the report. however, paragraph 1 The debate must be carried out in such a way that the person's personal data is protected.

Paragraph 2. If consensus cannot be reached in the report, the discussion will be closed at a meeting in which all the members of the Board should be present. If we are to put a vote to the debate, and if there is a vote, the President's vote will be rewarded.

Paragraph 3. The Board of Inches shall be notified in connection with the treatment of recorder aware of errors and deficiencies at a test of the educational institution of this information and the rules in section 41 shall apply.

§ 51. The Board of Appeal shall decide on the basis of the material on which the institution ' s decision is based, cf. Section 45 (3). 3, and the reasoned appeal of the student.

Paragraph 2. The decision of the akeneset net which shall be written and reasoned may go on the basis of

1) However, the reevaluation of new assesments shall not, however, be made in the case of oral tests.

2) Offer retry for new assesders.

3) That the complainant doesn't get a part of the appeal.

Paragraph 3. Rating and retry are subject to rules in section 47, and the assessment cannot be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. however, section 53 (3). 1.

§ 52. The decision of the notified body shall be notified to the institution of training as soon as possible and at the winter finals within two months and at the summer finals no later than three months after the appeal has been lodged with the institution.

Paragraph 2. If the request cannot be processed within this period, the institution of the training institution shall inform the complainant as soon as possible, stating the reasons for it and the indication of when the request is expected to be completed.

Paragraph 3. The Education Institute will give the student a report as soon as possible, and the assessment will be made of the decision. If the decision is made on the quoting or re-examination offer, the student must be informed that a lower level of judgment may result in a change or circumtest.

Paragraph 4. The decision of the applicant may not be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. However, § 53.

Paragraph 5. Ompasses and reevaluation will be done according to the rules of section 47.

Chapter 12

Complains of decisions taken by a training institution or a recognizance

§ 53. Complaguing the legal issues in decisions taken by the assessment pursuant to Section 47 (3). 3, and the name of the Board in accordance with section 51 (1). 1, shall be submitted to the institution of training within a period of two weeks from the date on which the decision has been announced.

Paragraph 2. Complaints of legal issues in decisions taken by the institution of Education in accordance with the rules in the notice may be brought to the Governing Committee of the Higher Education Management. The appeal shall be made to the institution of training, which shall deliver an opinion, which the student must have the opportunity to comment on within a period of normally 1 week. The Education Institute shall send the complaint, the opinion and the complainant's comments on the board. The deadline for filing a complaint to the institution of Education shall be two weeks from the date on which the decision has been announced.

Chapter 13

Other Rules

§ 54. The institution of the Education Institute with respect for the copyright ownership of the results or products resulting from a task solution, cf. however, paragraph 1 2.

Paragraph 2. If the task flow includes parties outside the educational institution, including undertakings, institutions and so on, the prior agreement between the educational institution, the student and the third party, to what extent the educational institution, Whereas the student and third party under the respect of applicable copyright rules is entitled to use the results obtained as part of the task flow, including the possible details of the third party's circumstances, which occur in : the solutions must be made public.

§ 55. The Commission shall be able to dispense with the notice on grounds of exceptional circumstances, except in cases referred to in section 5 (5). 4, section 8 (4). 5, section 36, paragraph. 2, section 43, paragraph. 2, and section 48 (3). 3 and 4.

Paragraph 2. The governance of the Higher Educational Committee may allow the rules of publication to be deviated from the course of experiments and development work.

Chapter 14

Entry into force and transitional provisions

§ 56. The announcement shall enter into force on 1. January 2014, and has effect from the year 2014-15.

Paragraph 2. New Censorcorps, cf. Section 22 must be able to be appointed with accession on 1. October 2014.

Paragraph 3. The period of the processing period for the appointed censors which has worked in 2013 will be extended to 30. September, 2014.