Advanced Search

Act Amending The Act On Sickness Benefits (Amendment Of The Employment Requirement, The Abolition Of The Right To Sick Pay On Public Holidays, Etc.) Reprinted Definitive Series

Original Language Title: Act amending the Act on Sickness Benefits (Amendment of employment requirement, the abolition of the right to sick pay on public holidays, etc.) Omtryk

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Law on the Change of Medicare Act

(Amendment of the employment requirement, the abolition of the right to sickness money on a lashrine and v.)

We, by God's grace, the Queen of the Danes, do our thing.

The parliament has adopted the following law, and we know that the following law has been approved by Parliament's consent :

§ 1

Law no. 563 of 9. June 2006 on sickness benefits, as amended in particular by Section 1 of Act 1. 1545 of 20. In December 2006 and section 1 of the Law No 480 of 12. June 2009, and at the latest at Section 2 of Law No 701 of 25. In June 2010, the following changes are made :

1. I Section 13 (1). 1, pasted Like 2. Act. :

' In the light of the follow-up, account must always be taken of the state of health of the sick. "

2. Section 13 (1). 4, ITREAS :

" Stop. 4. For all follow-up, an individual call is held, cf. however, paragraph 1 Five and six. However, the following may be telephonic, digitally or by letter, if :

1) The health of the sick situation is deemed to be unproblematic and return to full time occurs within 14 days of the date on which the call is to be made ;

2) the sick leave is in tenders ; or

3) in part, the sick are partly incapacable and has resumed work in part. `

3. I § 13 inserted after paragraph 1. 4 as new slices :

" Stop. 5. If the disease prevents an individual call, cf. paragraph 4, may follow up telephony, digitally or by letter.

Paragraph 6. If a serious disease prevents any contact with the sick man, the follow-up is carried out without any contact with the sygeman (standby). ` ;

Paragraph 5 shall then be referred to in paragraph 5. 7.

4. I § 24 pasted as paragraph 3 :

" Stop. 3. For the calculation of sickness benefits in accordance with paragraph 1. 1 is not included in the search for a public holiday. ` ;

5. I § 25, paragraph. 2, change ' section 24 (2) ; 2 " to : section 24 (4). Two and three.

6. I Section 32 (1). 1, no. 1, "13 weeks" is changed to : "26 weeks", and "120 hours" is changed to : "240 hours".

7. I Section 32 (1). 2, the ' 13-week period ' shall be replaced by the following : "26-week-period".

8. I § 50, paragraph. 3, and § 52, paragraph. 2, the ' per Day "to :" per day, cf. However, § 53 a `.

9. I § 51, 1. pkt., the ' sick ` shall be replaced by ' sick, cf. However, § 53 a `.

10. the following section of section 53 Chapter 18 :

" § 53 a. A person doesn't have the right to a health care plan on a Sunday holiday.

§ 2

Paragraph 1. The law shall enter into force on 2. July 2012, cf. however, paragraph 1 2.

Paragraph 2. Section 13 (1). 1 and 4-6, in the law on sickness benefits, as amended respectively by the section 1 of this Law. 1-3, enter into force on the third. January, 2011.

§ 3

Paragraph 1. Section 32 (1). 1, no. Paragraph 1, and section 32 (2). 2, in the law of sickness benefits, as amended by the section 1 of this law. 6 and 7 shall not apply to cases of illness where 1. Anniversary is before the 2nd. July 2012. These cases of illness are treated according to the existing rules.

Paragraph 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 24, paragraph 1. Three, in the Act of Medicare Benefits, lie holidays before the 2nd of the day. July 2012, in the calculation of the sickness benefits period after paragraph 24 (2). Paragraph 1, or § 25 (3). One, in the law of sickness benefits.

Givet at the Christiansborg Castle, the 21st. December 2010

Under Our Royal Hand and Segl

MARGRETHE R.

-Inger Stskberg

Retryksnote
  • 24-08-2011 :
  • The law has been reprinted, since the text "Under Our Royal Hand and Segl" prior to the name of the Regent or Regent, due to an error in the technical production of the formula, was omitted. The failure therefore does not apply to the law.