Read the untranslated law here: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=132416
Law amending the Law on dogs and dyreværnsloven1) (Prohibition of possession, etc. of certain dogs, royalties duty killing dogs that really bites, temporary disqualification from having to do with animals, etc.) We, Margrethe II, by the grace of God, do hereby proclaim: Queen Denmark The Folketing has passed and We Assent to the following law: § 1 The Act on dogs, cf. Consolidated Act No. 259 of 12 April 2005, as amended by section 4 of the Law No. 554 of 24 June 2005, article 17 of Law No. 538 of June 8, 2006, is amended as follows : 1. § 1. 1 is replaced by the following: ' The possessor of a dog shall ensure that the dog before it is 8 weeks old, ice cream market and registered. The possessor of a, however, should also ensure that the dog, from 4 months old, carrying collar equipped with a sign indicating the possessor's name and address. ' 2. In § 1. 3, the words ' may ' to ' shall '. 3. After section 1 added: ' article 1 (a). The possession and breeding of dogs following are prohibited: 1) Pitbull terrier. 2) Tosa Inu. American Staffordshire Terrier) 3. 4) Fila brasileiro. 5) Dogo Argentino. 6) American bulldog. 7) the Boerboel. 8) Kangal. Central Asian ovtcharka) 9. 10) Caucasian Shepherd however. 11) Sydrussisk ovtcharka. 12) Tornjak. 13) Sharplanina. PCS. 2. The prohibition in paragraph. 1 shall also apply to hybrids, which said dogs included. PCS. 3. Commercial imports of dogs that are covered by paragraph. 1 or 2 shall be prohibited. section 1 (b). Dogs kept or imported in violation of § 1 (a), killed by police measures. PCS. 2. Is there doubt as two whether a dog belonging to one of the breeds or crossbreeds thereof covered by § 1a, police may require that the possessor documenting dog breed or type. PCS. 3. If the possessor can not immediately provide sufficient evidence was provided. Paragraphs. 2, the police measures two temporarily remove the dog from the possessor. PCS. 4. Have a possessor or not within the police states with sufficient evidence that the dog does not belong to one of the breeds or crossbreeds thereof covered by paragraph 1 (a), considered the dog to be kept in violation of § 1 (a). ' 4. section 3, paragraph. 2 and 3 are deleted, and instead added: "Paragraph. 2. The local council may decide that in the municipality or more enumerated areas of the province to apply a duty to the cities and areas of urban settlements two always keep a dog in the band of streets, roads, paths or squares, etc. which are open two general traffic. The tape must be so short that the dog is kept close to the attendant. "Paragraph. 4-6 then become para. 3-5.5. section 3, paragraph. 6, which becomes paragraph. 5, read: "Paragraph. 5. The Minister of Justice may lay down rules that some dogs are not covered by the provisions on tape bond esta established under paragraph. 2. ' 6. § 6 paragraph. 2, read: "Paragraph. 2. If (a), however, has caused damage to a human or other serious injury if the dog or possessor conduct is of such a nature that it is capable of creating fear in his environment, or if there are any other reason assume, however, that the two may be dangerous two its surroundings, the police commissioner 1) give the possessor an injunction to the property where the dog is kept must be enclosed by a fence of up to 1.8 meters in height, which must be equipped with a sluice gate, 2) provide the possessor order that the dog may only be aired by the possessor or of other named person of 18 years and should not be aired along with other dogs, 3) provide the possessor order that the dog when not confined, must placed in bands, in order that the dog must be kept on a tape that is not more than 2 m long , or must be provided with sound, closed muzzle or both, or 4) two decide whether to let the dog put down. "7. In § 6, paragraph. 3 and 4, the words ' paragraph. 2, no. 1, "two" paragraph. 2, Nos. 1-3 '. 8. § 6 paragraph. 5, is repealed and replaced: "Paragraph. 5. If a, however, by an assault has savaged a human or another dog, the police commissioner easy the dog put down. PCS. 6. Police Director shall bear the cost of letting a however, kitten after paragraph. 2, no. 4 or paragraph. 4 or 5, but may require reimbursement from the possessor. "Paragraph. 6 becomes paragraph. 7.9. § 6 paragraph. 6, which becomes paragraph. 7, read: "Paragraph. 7. Where the dog to another possess, apply (a) notice under paragraph. 2, Nos. 1-3 or paragraph. 3 or a decision on killing after paragraph. 2, no. 4 or paragraph. 4 or 5 immediately to the new team. "10. In paragraph 6 (a) paragraph. 1 and 2, the words ' article 6 paragraph. 2, no. 2, "two:" § 6 paragraph. 2, no. 4 '. 11. § 6b paragraph. 1 and § 6 paragraph c. 1, the words ' in accordance with § 6 paragraph. 2, no. 2 or paragraph. 4. "two" in accordance with § 1 (b), subsection. 1, or article 6, paragraph. 2, no. 4 or paragraph. 4 or 5 '. 12. In paragraph 6 (c) paragraph. 2, the words ' Justice ' two: ' National Commissioner of Police. "13. section 7 repealed. 14. In section 8 paragraph. 3, the words "Insurance Association" two: "Insurance". 15. § 12 shall read: ' § 12. A fine is imposed on anyone who violates section 1) 1. 1, § 2, § 3, paragraph. 1, 1st-3rd section., § 3, paragraph. 3 or 4, section 5, section 6, paragraph. 1 or § 8 paragraph. 2, 2) violation of rules set up by the municipal council in accordance with § 3, paragraph. 2, or 3) violation of an order issued pursuant to section 4 and section 6, two paragraph. 2, Nos. 1-3 or paragraph. 3 pieces. 2. In determining the fines for violation of § 1. 1, § 3, paragraph. 1, 1st-3rd section., § 3, paragraph. 4, § 6, paragraph. 1, § 8 paragraph. 2, laid down by the municipal council in accordance with § 3, paragraph. 2, or a notice issued pursuant to section 6 paragraph two. 2, Nos. 1-3 or paragraph. 3, measured tougher penalty. The same penalty that which incites a dog for someone or fail to keep his back when the notes, however, that the assault anyone. PCS. 3. A fine or imprisonment up to one year be imposed on anyone who violates section 6 d. Paragraph. 4. With a fine or imprisonment for up to six months two punishment, dealing personally with dogs, no matter that he hate the right to do so, see. § 12 a paragraph. 1 piece. 5. A fine or, under aggravating circumstances, imprisonment for up to four months Any person who with knowledge that a person is disqualified two deal personally with the dogs after § 12 a paragraph. 1, leaving a dog in his custody. PCS. 6. In regulations issued pursuant to section two 1. 2 may stipulate fines for violations of the regulations. 16. In paragraph 12 (a) "paragraph. 1, no. 3, the words ' However, fight or ' for ' dog fight '. 17. In paragraph 12 (a) paragraph. 1, no. 4, the word ' However, fighting. ' City ' of dog fighting or '. 18. In paragraph 12 (a) paragraph. 1, the following points. 5: ' 5) were repeatedly punished for violation of § 3, paragraph. 1, 1st-3rd section., § 3, paragraph. 4, § 6, paragraph. 1, laid down by the municipal council in accordance with § 3, paragraph. 2, or an order issued pursuant to section 6 paragraph two. 2, Nos. 1-3 or paragraph. 3, see. section 12 paragraph. 1. ' 19. In section 12 (c) the words ' article 6 paragraph. 5 ': ' § 6 paragraph. 6 '. § 2 In the Animal Protection Act, cf. Consolidated Act No. 1343 of 4 December 2007, as amended by Law No. 499 of 12 June 2009, article 1 of Law No. 500 of 12 June 2009, is amended as follows: 1. In article 10 the following paragraph. 3 pieces. 3. Paragraph. 1 shall not apply to the keeping of dogs. "2. In section 29 after paragraph. 2 new paragraph: "Paragraph. 3. The Court may, in consideration of the cases referred in paragraph two. 1, by order exclude that person from owning, using, fit, meat or the whole deal personally with the animal until the case is finally decided. The ban may be limited two relate two certain species and number of animals. It can be in the order determined "that loved ones do not have suspensive effect. Pronounced with regard two disqualifications acquittal in the case, the lapses that prohibition if the judgement appealed. Violation of the ban is punishable by fine or imprisonment up to six months. "Paragraph. 3 becomes paragraph. 4.3. In article 29 paragraph. 3, which shall become. 4, after "paragraph. 1 ":" or paragraph. 3 '. § 3 pieces. 1. This Act shall enter into force on 1 July 2010. Paragraphs. 2. At the commencement of the Act, Executive Order No. 748 of 14 November 1991 prohibiting the keeping of certain dangerous dogs. PCS. 3. The provisions of paragraph 1. 1, points 1. Of the Act on dogs as worded by section 1, no. 1, includes dogs born after its commencement. PCS. 4. Person's 17 March 2010 poss essing dogs covered by section 1 a paragraph. 1, no. 3-13 of the Act on dogs as worded by section 1, no. 3, or crosses in which these dogs included, can continue to hold them. Such dogs may not be transferable. On the streets, roads, paths, squares, etc., which are open two general traffic, the dogs must be in the band and be provided with sound, closed muzzled. The requirement that dogs must be kept on tape, do not apply in forests where the owner has given permission for dogs can go outside band. The tape should be a solid line with a maximum length of 2 m. Paragraph. 5. Penalty that violate paragraph. 4th PCS. 6. Person's on 17 March 2010, esta established independent company with breeding of dogs covered by section 1 a paragraph. 1, no. 3-13 of the Act on dogs as worded by section 1, no. 3, or crosses in which these dogs included, two continue those activities until 30 June 2015. section 4 of the Act does not apply Faroe Islands and Greenland. Given to Christiansborg Palace, June 25, 2010 Under Our Royal Hand and Seal Margrethe r./Lars Barfoed Official notes 1) The Bill has been notified in accordance with European Parliament and Council Directive 98/34/EC (Transparency Directive) as amended by Directive 98/48/EC.
Search Translated Laws of Denmark