Advanced Search

Notice Of Examination And Evaluation By University Education (Exam Notice)

Original Language Title: Bekendtgørelse om eksamen og censur ved universitetsuddannelser (eksamensbekendtgørelsen)

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Table of Contents

Chapter 1 Objective

Chapter 2 Test methods

Chapter 3 Detention of samples, etc.

Chapter 4 The assessment and so forth.

Chapter 5 Requirements for the study system

Chapter 6 Examination and so on.

Chapter 7 Complations of samples, etc.

Chapter 8 Other Rules

Chapter 9 Censorcorps

Chapter 10 Censores

Chapter 11 Entry into force and transitional provisions

Completion of the degree and censorship at university graduates (diplomas)

In accordance with Article 8 (2), 1 and 2, section 8 (a), Rule 34 (1) and Article 34 (1). 1, in the case of universities (university law), cf. Law Order no. 754 of 17. June 2010 shall be determined :

§ 1. The announcement shall apply to the degree and censorship of undergrad and candidate education, and master training and other part-time training, subject to the university law, unless otherwise specified in the notice of training.

Paragraph 2. The rules on the first-year test of undergraduate training, cf. section 15 -17, and whether to test and orderly in accordance with the test. Section 18 does not apply to students who are admitted to underage and candidate education according to the rules on part-time training, cf. the notice of subtraining at the universities (parttime notice).

Section I

Experm

Chapter 1

Objective

§ 2. The purpose of the examination is to assess the degree to which the student meets the technical objectives laid down for the studies in the field of study / vocational training courses. The final test provides the basis for the issuance of diplomas, cf. § 29, paragraph. 1.

Paragraph 2. The university is determined in the study arrangements for the degree of precise target descriptions and criteria for the assessment of the measurement of the individual professional (s), which must be completed with a test, see it in accordance with a test. the report on character scale and other assessment of university education (character notice).

Chapter 2

Test methods

§ 3. The test form shall serve the purpose of the individual subject matter (s).

Paragraph 2. The tests must be organized as individual samples, cf. however, paragraph 1 6.

Paragraph 3. For the purposes of individual samples :

1) Extremination and response must take place individually, cf. however, paragraph 1 5.

2) An individual assessment is to be made and is given individual characters.

Paragraph 4. Only an independent nature can be given for a written task of writing which has been drawn up by several students, if each student's contribution can be established, so as to ensure that an individual assessment is carried out.

Paragraph 5. If an independent nature is not given for a written task of writing which has been drawn up by several students, the task shall be included in the assessment by a subsequent individual oral or other test of the individual student, cf. Section 4 (4). 2.

Paragraph 6. The State of the University and the Construction Authority may be dispensers from the provision in paragraph 1. 2 if it is absolutely essential to demonstrate compliance with the objectives of the professional element. However, this does not apply in the case of paragraph 5. 3, no. 2.

Paragraph 7. If the individual students wish to do so, the university must ensure that students are given the opportunity to deliver an individual written task of responsibility instead of a task of task, which has been drawn up by several students, cf. paragraph 4 and 5. This does not, however, apply to tests where the Management Board has been dispensed by paragraph 1. 6.

§ 4. The training must contain a variety of sample forms to reflect the content and work of the notification and which may be

1) oral, written and practical tests,

2) participation in education, training, drills, etc.,

3) the combinations of the number 1-2, or

4) project-oriented process, possibly linked to areas outside the university or abroad.

Paragraph 2. It may be set out in the student scheme that prior to the assessment of a task response, a lecture on or oral defence of the task is to be held. The assessment shall be carried out on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of the written task of response and the oral performance, cf. Section 3, paragraph 3. 5.

Chapter 3

Detention of samples, etc.

§ 5. Oral tests are public, cf. however, paragraph 1 2 and 3 unless they are covered by a contract after Article 43 (3). 2.

Paragraph 2. Clinical samples of patient participation are only public with the permission of the patient.

Paragraph 3. The university may derogate from the provision in paragraph 1. 1 if there are special circumstances, including where the reference to the student speaks for this. In addition, the university can limit access to the enclosure, for reasons of space, and individuals may be denied access or be expelled if necessary to ensure the necessary order of the test.

Paragraph 4. It shall be submitted for presentation of or oral defence of a task response, cf. Section 4 (4). If the test is based on a task response and are the response to a number of students, these students may not be present in the enclosure before they are to be finalizing.

Paragraph 5. The sound and / or image recordings of a test are not allowed unless the recordings are part of the test flow. The footage is made by the university.

Paragraph 6. Only examiner and censor may be present during the deliberation by oral tests, cf. 20. The university can, however, decide that future examiners must be allowed to overtake a voter.

§ 6. In the case of studies offered in Danish, the tests shall be made in Danish, cf. however, paragraph 1 2 and 3, unless it is part of the test purpose to document the skills of students in a foreign language. However, the samples may be submitted in Swedish and Norwegian instead of Danish, unless it is part of the purpose of the test to document the skills of Danish.

Paragraph 2. The university can, by the way, where conditions allow students to take a sample in a foreign language. However, this does not apply if it is part of the purpose of the test to document skills in Danish or in a particular foreign language.

Paragraph 3. If the teaching of a subject has been conducted in a foreign language, the test in this language shall be tested in this language unless it is part of the purpose of trying to document the skills of students in a different language. The university can derogate from this rule.

Paragraph 4. In terms of training provided in English or in other foreign languages, the samples must be made in the tender language unless it is part of the test purpose to document the skills of students in a different language. The university can derogate from this rule.

§ 7. The university may offer special conditions for students with physical or mental function reduction and to students with a different mother tongue other than Danish when the university assesses that it is necessary to equate these students with others in : the test situation. It is a prerequisite that the proposal does not make a change to the level of the test.

§ 8. The university can conduct tests as a video conferencing or by other technical measures. The university must ensure that the security measures in connection with the conduct of such a test are equivalent to what is commonly applicable to the running of the sample. The university appoints or approves the supervisors who will be with the student during the test. Eksaminator and censor may be anywhere other than the student, but must examiners and give the assessment according to the applicable rules, by the way.

§ 9. The university sets rules on disciplinary measures in the event of exams and disruption in the examination of the examination.

§ 10. The university is able to establish rules on the use of computers in the study arrangements.

Retries abroad

§ 11. The university may conduct tests on a Danish representation or elsewhere abroad where it is justified that the student of practical or economic reasons cannot participate in the university tests in Denmark and when the student and the test site is in agreement. The conduct of Danish tests abroad must take place in accordance with the rules of the notice, by the way.

Paragraph 2. The university shall designate or approve the supervisors and other persons who shall be responsible for the conduct of the test abroad.

§ 12. The university is holding the special costs associated with the test being held abroad.

Paragraph 2. In the case of tests on Danish representations abroad, the notice of payment for service activities in the External Action Service shall apply.

Paragraph 3. The university is able to allow students wholly or partially to pay for the costs incurred by the university in connection with the examination of the test. It is a condition that the student, prior written notice, has declared its willingness to pay the relevant expenditure. The university may make the test the amount of the test the amount of prepaid.

Number of test trials

§ 13. A passed test can not be taken, cf. The report's announcement.

Paragraph 2. The student has three test trials to comprise a test, etc., cf. however, section 15. The university may allow further tests if exceptional circumstances are available. Missing student fitness is not an unusual relationship.

Paragraph 3. A student who, in the second time, must have its tuition attendance, cf. Section 4 (4). 1, no. 2, may request an audition instead. However, teaching participation, where practical exercises are attached, cannot be replaced by a test.

Paragraph 4. A student's receipt of an offer of retrial in accordance with section 19 (1). 3, section 34, paragraph 1. 1, no. Paragraph 2, or section 39 (2). 1, no. 3, shall not be regarded as a test procedure in accordance with paragraph 1. 2.

Enrollment for samples

§ 14. In the enrollment of the student to a professional element, etc., to which one or more samples are assigned to it, the student is automatically enrolled in the sample or samples. At the same time, the university sets a time limit for the timely departure from the test, cf. however, paragraph 1 3.

Paragraph 2. If no timely declaration is available, the test shall be considered as to the number of test attempts as started, cf. Section 13 (1). 2.

Paragraph 3. When the university has set a deadline for the Candidate Special, cf. the notification of the training and qualifications of universities (educational notice) may not be carried out and a test attempt has been used, having a test in the case of : Section 13 (1). 2 if the student does not deliver the specialty within the time limit set.

Paragraph 4. University may dispensers from paragraph 1. One-three, including the time limits laid down in the case of exceptional circumstances.

First-season test of undergraduate studies

§ 15. The university is established in the study for undergraduate training, which tests the student must attend before the end of the first study year after study test (first-year test). The student must, by the end of the student year ' s other study year after study, must last, before the end of the student ' s second study, in order to continue training. This applies regardless of whether or not the student has performed three trials in accordance with the test procedure. Section 13 (1). 2.

§ 16. In the case of undergraduations, the beginning of 1. September, the result of the first test trial, cf. section 15, most recently notified to the student before 1. August the following year. If the ordinary test has not been passed, the student may be at the latest enrolling for retrial in August and the result must be notified to the student at the latest before the end of September.

Paragraph 2. In the case of undergraduations, the beginning of 1. February, the result of the first test trial, cf. Section 15, have been notified to the student before 1. Feb the following year.

§ 17. The university may dispense with the time limits set out in section 15 and section 16 if exceptional circumstances are available.

Ompasses and health tests

§ 18. In the case of training at the end of the autumn sseus, students who have participated in an ordinary test must be given the possibility of retesting in the same examination term or in the immediate extension, however ; no later than February. Where qualifications are subject to examination at the end of the spring session, students who have participated in an ordinary test must be given the possibility of retesting in the same examination term or in the immediate extension, however ; no later than August. Similarly, if students have been prevented from taking part in an ordinary test due to illness.

Paragraph 2. In education, where there are more exams of degrees than in paragraph 1. 1, students who have participated in an ordinary test without passing on shall be given the possibility of retesting as soon as possible, but not later than six months after the ordinary trial. Similarly, if students have been prevented from taking part in an ordinary test due to illness.

Paragraph 3. The student has not passed a retrial or a medical test to be held in accordance with the rules laid down in paragraph 1. 1 and 2, the student shall be given the opportunity to participate in the next ordinary test.

Paragraph 4. It may be fixed in the study scheme that the sample or the health sample has a different test or assessment of the test other than the ordinary test, see it in accordance with the test. Section 4 (4). One, section 20. However, this does not apply to the undergraduate project, the candidate specialist or the master project.

Error or missing at the test m.v.

§ 19. If the university of a test is aware of errors and shortcomings, the university may, where appropriate, be taken from the person responsible or those responsible for the sample, decide on how the failure or the lack of assistance can be remedied.

Paragraph 2. In the absence of a particularly serious nature or where it may be considered the most appropriate method of correcting the failure or the lack thereof, the university may cancel the test and arrange an extraordinary retrial.

Paragraph 3. In other material errors and deficiencies other than those referred to in paragraph 1. Two said the university can make an offer of an extraordinary retrial. In this case, the tender must be given to all students whose test is suffering from that error or a lack of a test. A student who has participated in the extraordinary retrial may choose to retain the initial assessment given.

Chapter 4

The assessment and so forth.

20. The samples are either internal or external.

Paragraph 2. In the case of internal tests, the assessment of one or more sub-viewers (exams) has been appointed by the university of the teachers at the university.

Paragraph 3. For external tests, the assessment shall be carried out by one or more examiners and one or more censors appointed by the University and Construction Management Board, cf. Section II on censorship.

Paragraph 4. The external auditories must cover the main areas of education, including undergraduates, candidate specialises and master project. At least 1/3 of an education total ECTS points shall be documented by external tests. However, it does not apply to merit; tests, cf. -$30.

Paragraph 5. The assessment of a student ' s educational participation, cf. Section 4 (4). 1, no. 2, shall be carried out by the sub-victor at that class.

§ 21. Censor and examiner shall, during the voting, take notes on the performance and the nature of the report for the processing of any appeal proceedings. The notes must be kept for at least one year and, in addition to any appeal proceedings, have been completed.

§ 22. When a test has begun, a judgment must be given unless the test is interrupted because of sickness, which justifies the health test.

Paragraph 2. If a test is broken, no assessment shall be given and the student has used a test sample, cf. Section 13 (1). 2.

-23. Assessment is given in accordance with the 7-step scale or the assessment passed / Unpassed or Approved / Not Approved, cf. The report's announcement. The bachelor project, master's and master project is judged by the 7-step scale. For education participation, etc., cf. Section 4 (4). 1, no. 2, the assessment passed / Unpassed or Approved / Not Accepted. The study arrangements shall lay down rules on the extent to which the student must have taken part in the training and so on.

Paragraph 2. The assessment passed / Unpassed or Approved / Not approved may not be more than used for samples covering one-third of the ECTS-points training point. However, it does not apply to merit; tests, cf. -$30.

§ 24. In the assessment of the understudy, master design, master project and other major written tasks, the technical content must also be attached to the spelling and formulation of the students in accordance with the technical nature. § 6. In the case of study, the rules on the formulation and wording of the wording are included in the overall assessment of the examination performance, however weighted in the sole position of the professional content, unless the factor/trade element is language or foreign language.

Paragraph 2. The bachelor project, master's and master project, must be provided with a summary in a foreign language. If the understudy, master or master project is written in a foreign language, except for Norwegian and Swedish, the summary may be written in Danish. The study arrangements shall be determined how the summary is included in the overall assessment of the examination performance and the language of which the summary may or should be written.

Paragraph 3. The university can dispensers from paragraph 1. 1 for students documenting a relevant specific reduction, unless the spell and wording of the test is an essential part of the purpose of the test.

§ 25. The university can lay down rules for printing and converting price tasks.

Paragraph 2. The university can establish, for the individual training, that a price task can be converted to a specialty. A price tag that's got gold medal is converted to the grade 12.

Publication of the assessment

SECTION 26. When the evaluation is not notified to students immediately after the test, the university shall fix a date on which the assessment will be published.

Paragraph 2. The date of paragraph 1. 1 shall be within four weeks of the holding, cf. ; however, section 16, and shall be notified to the student at the same time as the notice of the examination of the test shall be either in a disclosed or otherwise. In the calculation of the four weeks of the month of July, no.

Paragraph 3. However, for undergraduate oractic, Candidate Species and Master Project, the assessment must be published within two months after the project / specialty has been submitted for assessment. In the calculation of the two months, July is not part of the month.

Paragraph 4. The university may derogate from the one in paragraph 1. 1-3 fixed time limit if there are special circumstances. If the assessment cannot be carried out on the date, then the university must inform the student accordingly as soon as possible, with a justification and information on when the assessment will be published.

Chapter 5

Requirements for the study system

§ 27. The study system for the individual training shall be fixed as follows :

1) Rules on sampling, including on the test is oral or written, and whether or not the student may choose between several samples and the number of students who may participate in a task response, cf. section 3 and section 4 (4). 1.

2) Rules on participation in the training and so forth and the delivery of written task responses, etc., which are a prerequisite for participating in the test or part of the test, cf. section 3 and section 4 (4). 1.

3) Any rules on the holding of a lecture on or oral defence of a task response, cf. Section 4 (4). 2.

4) Rules on the language of diplomas, cf. § 6.

5) Any rules concerning the special conditions for students, cf. § 7.

6) Any rules on the use of the computer in the samples, cf. § 10.

7) Rules on the location of the tests in the training process, including which tests the student must participate before the end of the first study year of undergraduate training, cf. § 15.

8) Rules on retrial and medical test, cf. § 18.

9) Rules for which tests are external, cf. Section 20 (2). 4.

10) Rules on the tests on which of the samples are given and by which tests are given passed / Unpassed or Approved / Not Approved, cf. -23.

11) Rules on the extent to which the student must have taken part in the teaching of the test form of teaching participation, cf. Section 23, paragraph 1. One, last point.

12) Rules on how the spelling and formulation of the students are included in the overall evaluation of the examination performance, cf. section 24 (2). 1.

13) Rules on how the summary is included in the assessment and which language the summary can or must be written on, cf. section 24 (2). 2.

14) Rules on subtests, confession, examinations, etc., cf. Chapter 3 of the grade notice.

Paragraph 2. It must be stated in the study of the study that, if there are exceptional circumstances, the university may dispense with the rules laid down in the course of the study, which alone is set by the university.

Orientation of students on diplomas

§ 28. It is the responsibility of the university to inform and guide students on the qualifications of qualifications that apply to individual training.

Chapter 6

Examination and so on.

§ 29. The university is issuing diplomas for completed training, cf. paragraph 2. The proof must have been submitted to the completed trained within two months after the assessment of the final test has been published. In the calculation of the two months, July is not part of the month.

Paragraph 2. The proof shall be made in Danish, cf. however, paragraph 1 4, and must indicate at least :

1) The name and the CPR number or other equivalent unique identification number of the completed name.

2) The name of the university.

3) The term of education gives the right to the Danish / Latin and English language.

4) The noring of the training in ECTS points, including any propedide-to-class education.

5) What a degree of undergraduate education or training is the basis for candidate training.

6) The professional items that are tested or otherwise documented, indicating the scope of ECTS points.

7) Merittransferred tests, cf. -$30.

8) The language of the satias if the test has been placed in a foreign language, cf. § 6.

9) Assessments achieved, cf. Section 23, paragraph 1. 1 and, if applicable, the average of the overall degree of examination, cf. The report's announcement.

10) A skill profile that describes the training.

Paragraph 3. If the university issus diplomas for an education which has been carried out as a parallel flow and common education, the rules shall also apply in the order of parallel and joint education. If the university is issuing diplomas for an Erasmus Mundus Candius education, then the rules in the announcement of training and Erasmus Mundus Candius in the universities are also valid.

Paragraph 4. The graduates can demand that the diplomas be drafted in English.

Paragraph 5. As an Annex to the diploma, the university is issuing an English Diploma Supplement in accordance with the model developed on the basis of EU Commission, Council of Europe and UNESCO/CEPES standard model, and which describes the training of training ; the professional direction, content, level and objective, and provide information about the university and the location of the information and training in the Danish education system.

Paragraph 6. The proof may not contain information on any particular test terms, cf. section 7 and section 24 (4). 3.

Paragraph 7. The total evidence of an education carried out by several universities and, where appropriate, other educational establishments, shall be issued by the university in which the student is last recorded and written to the degree in question.

Paragraph 8. If the student is in training without having implemented it, the university shall issue the student documentation on the appropriate part of the training indicated in the ECTS points.

-$30. Has the university approved that a qualified trade / professional element from a Danish or foreign higher education institution is transferred, must be passed on as Bealleged / Approved. If the relevant professional element is assessed after the 7-step scale at both educational establishments, the assessment is carried forward with a grade. If a trade / trade element has been carried out by a foreign training institution, it shall be included in an annex to the diploma which is the nature of the character scale used in this institution, and a summary of the term used ; Grade scale.

§ 31. The university shall keep the information necessary to issue evidence for 30 years after the end of the test or the test. The information shall be delivered to the State Archives.

Chapter 7

Complations of samples, etc.

§ 32. The storage of samples or other assessment, which is part of the examination, shall be submitted by the student to the university. The complaint shall be written and substantiated.

Paragraph 2. The complaint must be submitted within two weeks of the publication of the assessment. However, the period shall not run at the earliest date from the date of publication, cf. SECTION 26.

Paragraph 3. The university may dispensers from the time limit laid down in paragraph 1. 2 if exceptional conditions exist.

§ 33. Among other things, the following may be complained :

1) Legal question.

2) The base (question, tasks and the like of the case).

3) The test process.

4) The judgmental.

Paragraph 2. If the complaint relates to the assessment or other matters relating to the assessment, the university shall immediately submit the complaint to the assessment, which has a deadline of 2 weeks to submit an opinion on the assessment and so forth in the complaint. The university may decide that the evaluation will have a longer period if there are special circumstances. In the calculation of the due date of the evaluation, no July shall be included The complainant must be given the opportunity to comment on the opinion of the assessors within a period of at least 1 week.

Paragraph 3. The university shall take a decision in accordance with paragraph 1. 1, cf. paragraph 2, on the basis of the opinion of the assessors and the complainant of the opinion.

Paragraph 4. If the university is to be treated in connection with the treatment of a complaint, attention is paid to errors or deficiencies in a test, the rules shall apply in section 19.

§ 34. The decision of the university to be written and reasoned may go on the basis of

1) the proposal for a new assessment (reassessment), but not by oral samples,

2) test for a new sample (retrial), or

3) the complainant will not be included in the complaint.

Paragraph 2. The university must, as soon as possible, give the complainant and the judges, cf. Section 33 (4). 2, notification of the decision.

$35. The complainant shall not later than two weeks after the decision of the university has been notified to the complainant, accept the quotation or retrial offer. Reevaluation or retrial must be carried out as soon as possible. If the diploma has been issued, cf. § 29, paragraph. 1, the university must withdraw the certificate until the assessment is available and, where appropriate, issue a new evidence.

Paragraph 2. In the case of review and re-examination, new examiners of the university and the censors are designated, cf. § 59, paragraph. 1, no. 4, by the censor-foreman.

Paragraph 3. In judgment, the assessment must have presented the case files, including the task, the response, the complainant, the original judgment, the comments of the complainant and the decision of the university.

Paragraph 4. The assessment and retrial of the assessment, which may result in a lower grade, shall be communicated to the university of the assessment. In the case of a reevaluation of the written examination, the assessment shall be attached to a written justification for the assessment. The assessment and retrial of the assessment may not be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. however, section 42 (2). 1.

Recognizers

§ 36. A complaint that has not been included in the complaint, cf. § 34, paragraph. 1, no. 3, may bring the decision of the university to professional matters, cf. Section 33 (4). 1, no. Two-four, for one of the University set up, set up a set of anime, cf. Clause 37, making a decision.

Paragraph 2. The plaintiff is making the appeal to the university. The Anken must be written and reasoned.

Paragraph 3. The application shall be submitted within two weeks of its decision to the complainant of the decision.

Paragraph 4. The university may dispensers from the time limit referred to in paragraph 1. 3 if exceptional conditions exist.

§ 37. The university is setting a stove as soon as possible after the submission of an appeal. Permanent recognition may be reduced.

Paragraph 2. The Board is composed of two-class censors, an examination of qualifications and a student in the field of professional expertise.

Paragraph 3. The CensorChato, cf. § 49, paragraph. 1, identify the two censors. The censorchair shall appoint one of the censores of the Board of Chairperson. The Censorforeman may appoint himself as a censor or as chairman.

Paragraph 4. The university appoints the vice-visor and the student.

Paragraph 5. The company ' s activities shall be subject to the administrative act, including the rules on inhability and professional secrecy.

§ 38. In order for the Board of the Board to be able to act as a quorum, all members of the Board shall participate in the discussion, and all the files of the proceedings shall be sent to all members. The discussion may take place in writing, including electronic, if there is a consensus among the members of the jury in writing, in accordance with the procedure laid down in the report. however, paragraph 1 2. The debate must be carried out in such a way as to protect the personal data of the complainant (confidential communications).

Paragraph 2. If consensus cannot be reached in the report, the discussion will be closed at a meeting in which all the members of the Board should be present. If we are to put a vote to the vote, and there is a vote, the President's vote will be rewarded.

Paragraph 3. The Board of Appeal shall decide on paragraph 1. 1, cf. paragraph Two, on the basis of the material which was based on the decision of the university and on the basis of the reasoned appeal.

Paragraph 4. In the course of the treatment of an appeal, the Board of Indicators shall be aware of errors or deficiencies in an attempt to inform the university and the rules in section 19 shall apply.

§ 39. The decision of the akeneset net which shall be written and reasoned may go on the basis of

1) an offer that the name of the Board shall assess the test, including increases and reduce the grade or change the assessment, not passed / Authorisation and not approved / approved for a second assessment, but not in the case of oral tests,

2) a new assessment of the assessment (reevaluation) by new asses-however, not by oral samples ;

3) new test sample (retry) by new asses; or

4) the complainant will not be included in the complaint.

Paragraph 2. Rating and retry are subject to rules in section 35, and the assessment cannot be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. however, section 42 (2). 1.

§ 40. The decision of the anchaeer shall be notified to the university as soon as possible and within two months of the date of submission of the appeal. In the calculation of the two months, July is not part of the month.

Paragraph 2. The appeal may not be admissible within the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article. The university must inform the complainant as soon as possible, with a justification and information on when the request is expected to be completed.

§ 41. The university shall notify the complainant as soon as possible of the declaration of the inane.

Paragraph 2. The decision of the applicant may not be brought to the second administrative authority, cf. however, section 42 (2). 1.

§ 42. Complaguing the decisions taken pursuant to section 33 (3). 3, section 35, paragraph. 4, or Section 38 (3). 3, may be brought to the university if the complaint relates to legal matters.

Paragraph 2. The complaint shall be submitted to the university no later than two weeks after the decision has been notified to the student.

Paragraph 3. The university can dispensers from paragraph 1. 2 if exceptional conditions exist.

Paragraph 4. The university decision in accordance with paragraph 1. 1 may be submitted to the University and Facilities Management Board, cf. § 46.

Chapter 8

Other Rules

§ 43. The university must respect the intangible right of students ' intangible rights to produce results, products and the like that appear in the context of a test.

Paragraph 2. If the test process includes parties outside the university, including undertakings, institutions, etc., it is agreed between the university, the student and the third party to what extent the university, the student or third party, under the respect of, the applicable immaterial legal rules shall be entitled to use the results, products and similar products which are subject to the test flow, including any information relating to the third party's circumstances, which appear in the task, shall be published.

§ 44. Students may continue training during the examination by the university of a complaint or appeal proceedings in accordance with Chapter 7.

§ 45. The Board of Appeal and Construction Management Board shall be able to dispense with the rules of the notice in section I of the examination for the reasons given in exceptional circumstances.

Complages of the university decisions

§ 46. The final decisions of the College of Infinite Decisions of the College of Infinite in this Order may be submitted to the College and Facilities Management Board of the Decision (s) in respect of which the complaint relates to legal matters. The deadline for filing a complaint is two weeks from the date on which the decision has been announced.

Paragraph 2. The appeal shall be submitted to the university issuing a statement. The complainant shall have the opportunity to comment on the opinion of the university within a period of at least 1 week. The university sends the complaint to the Board attached to the statement and any comments made by the complainant.

TITLE II

Censorship

Chapter 9

Censorcorps

§ 47. The University and City Department Board will board a nationwide corps of censors (censors of censors of censors).

Paragraph 2. A censorship includes undergraduate and master training and master training and second subgeneration according to the university law in the same professional or related area, as one or more universities have been approved to offer. For the humanist, natural sciences and social sciences, which consist of a core subject, cf. However, the educational announcement may be set up for each subject.

Paragraph 3. Before the Accreditation Council accepts an education / key subject, cf. law on the Accreditation institution for higher education, the College of University and City of Facilities, which censorship training / key subject must be associated with.

Paragraph 4. An overview of the censorcorps is available on the University and Building Type website.

§ 48. The Censorcorps must be set up as such,

1) the overall corps covers all the professional / trade elements included in the education / major fields, and the areas of employment which are intended to be taken by training ;

2) that a person has their main employment outside the universities in one of the areas of employment, the training of education, and the aim of which is to do so.

3) an equitable distribution of female and male censors is sought ; and

4) for the training / central subject where appropriate, censors are included in foreign universities.

§ 49. For each center corps selected by and among the censores, cf. in Chapter 10, a presidency consisting of a censorchair and one or more Vice-Presidents. The previous censorrotor held the elections.

Paragraph 2. The Censorchair represents the censores in the centre for the universities and the University and the Construction Authority.

Paragraph 3. The new Censoroffice will inform the universities of the universities and the University and the Construction Authority on the choice of paragraph 1. 1.

Paragraph 4. In the shape of new censorcorps, cf. § 47, paragraph. Paragraph 1 shall be provided for in paragraph 1. Paragraph 1, and section 56 (3). 1st, first time of university or university colleges.

$50. The Censorship Chain Chain shall, after consulting with university or universities, be censorship among censorship among the censors in the centre for the censorship, cf. however, section 56 (3). 4. The CensorChain Chain-Chair Distributes the CIs, so that the censors and at least every two years are allocated for the censories. Where the Centre shall cover more universities, the censorship shall be assigned to the centre as far as possible in more than one university during the time of the beck-period, cf. § 56, paragraph. In the case of distribution, account shall be taken of any particular prerequisites regarding the professional authority of the censor for the individual tests.

Paragraph 2. The Censorship Presidency must be in the performance of quality assurance of the test and degrees of training courses of education ;

1) suspend censors for the shape, cf. § 56, paragraph. 1,

2) advise the universities of the form and content of the samples, cf. § 59, paragraph. 1, no. 2,

3) submit an annual report to the universities on the basis of the reports reported, cf. § 59, paragraph. 1, no. 3,

4) answer hearings on study schemes and major changes in the courses of study courses which affect the audits and diplomas, and

5) be available to the university, including the marketing panels, for the development of new samples.

Paragraph 3. The CensorChair includes an ongoing dialogue on the quality of the tests and the quality of the examinations, including the quality of the qualifications, at least every other year to organise censorsessions with the censores in the centre and contact meetings between universities, including tape panels, and censores.

§ 51. The censorship must not be employed at the university or by the faculty if the university is divided into the main areas where they are to act as a censor, unless there is a secondary education, other than the censor of the censorship and teaches at the centre. The university's executive board members, Headmaster, dekaner, institution leaders and others in similar positions cannot, however, act as a censor at the university. It must be avoided as far as possible to ensure that examiners perform censurodiversions for each other (Mutual censorship).

Paragraph 2. The activities of the censorers are subject to the administrative act, including the rules on inhability and professional secrecy.

§ 52. In the case of a censor where it has not been possible to call a censor, the university may designate a person as a censor who meets the requirements of section 55.

Paragraph 2. The University of the College shall, as soon as possible, be censored by the appointment as referred to in paragraph 1 1.

§ 53. The university creates websites of access to up-to-date information on the educational / key courses relevant to them, including this notice, the report and the study of the education system, and other material that is relevant to the censorship ' s activities.

Paragraph 2. The university must provide the censories for the individual censuses with the material necessary to enable the censores to perform tasks.

§ 54. Universities cover the cost of the censor-presidency and censores, cf. The staff circle circular on hourly training and circular about the censored payment. Universities shall provide for administrative and practical assistance following prior agreement with its censoroffice.

Chapter 10

Censores

§ 55. In order to be appointed as censor, the person must have

1) a relevant research-based training on the candidate level,

2) detailed and up-to-date knowledge of the scientific disciplines of the professional area, including the theory and methods of the profession ;

3) specific competence within one or more areas of professional competence, which are included in the training / major class ; and

4) the current knowledge of the conditions of use of training and the main subject of applications, including knowledge of the situation and the needs of the people.

§ 56. The European University and City Department Board will board the censorship of the censorship setting.

Paragraph 2. The CensorChain Council shall consult the universities before the setting takes account of the provisions of section 48 and section 55.

Paragraph 3. The Censorship shall be ordered for four years at a time, cf. however, paragraph 1 For each new processing period, at least one quarter of the censorship shall be replaced at a quarter of the censorship. Additional censors may be provided within the period, including in cases where new certified training must be associated with the centre for the centre, cf. § 47, paragraph. 3.

Paragraph 4. In exceptional cases, the Censorship can not be censored by censors for stand-alone censuropgifts.

Paragraph 5. Following a reasoned recommendation from the censorship or a university, the State of University and the City of Construction may put an end to the censorship until the end of the term, if the presidency or the university considers that a censor is not satisfactory.

§ 57. Censorsubjects are in the centre of proposals from the censorrotor, censorcorps, universities and in professional magazines, periodicals and so on.

§ 58. Censor has to be checked.

1) the requirements for the content of the training tests are in line with the objectives and other requirements laid down for training, including in the training notice and in study arrangements,

2) the tests are carried out in accordance with the applicable rules ; and

3) that the students receive a uniform and fair treatment that their performance is given a reliable assessment, in accordance with the rules of the report, in particular the rules laid down in the study arrangements for training ; and other rules for training.

$59. A censor must

1) act as a censor at the external auditor of the training / central subject, cf. Section 20 (2). 3,

2) advise on the test system, including its form and content, and whether it works according to its purpose and in accordance with the objectives of the training / central area and the objectives of the notification ;

3) at the end of the examination certificate, a report on the degree of examination for the university and the Presidency, and

4) contribute to the processing of appeals and the anchors of samples, cf. Section 33 (4). 2, section 35 (4). Article 37 (2) and section 37 (3). 2.

Paragraph 2. Replacing the censor of the fact that the conditions referred to in Section 58 are not met or if the centre of the centre does not comply with major problems or deficiencies in the university's intake of an education, the Centre shall issue a copy to the university with a copy of the said document ; The censordid presidency.

TITLE III

Entry into force and transitional provisions

Chapter 11

Entry into force and transitional provisions

§ 60. The announcement shall enter into force on 1. September, 2010.

Paragraph 2. At the same time, notice No 867 of 19. August 2004 on the examination of university graduates (diploma notice), cf. however, paragraph 1 3.

Paragraph 3. Publication no. 867 of 19. In August 2004 on the examination of university graduations (diplomas) shall continue to apply to complaints of samples in which the sample is to be held before 1. September, 2010.

The Ministry of Science, Technologies and Development, the 1. July 2010

Charlotte Sahl-Madsen

/ Gertie Lund