Appendix 1

Completion on the implementation of the Commission decision of 6. March 2008, on a technical specification for the interoperability of the energy subsystem for the trans-European high-speed rail system, 1)

In accordance with section 21 h (1) (i), 1, in the law of rail, cf. Law Order no. 567 of 9. June 2008 shall be determined according to Article 24 (a) authorisation :

§ 1. The announcement shall implement the Commission Decision of 6. In March 2008, on a technical specification for the interoperability of the energy subsystem, the energy system of the trans-European high-speed rail system is being set up.

Paragraph 2. The Commission ' s decision, with its annexes, Technical Specifications for Interoperability, the Energy System "Energy", shall be annexes to the notice.

§ 2. The announcement will enter into force on the 20th. March, 2009.

Paragraph 2. Provisions for the implementation of technical specifications for interoperability (TSI) for the subsystem ' electricity supply ' in the trans-European high-speed rail system, BJ 7-01, are hereby repealed.

---

Appendix 1

THE COMMISSION FOR THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HAS-

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 96 /48/EC of 23. July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system 1) , and in particular Article 6 (2), 1,

in the following considerations :

(1) The trans-European high-speed rail system shall be in accordance with Article 2 (c) and Annex II of Directive 96 /48/EC broken down into subsystems of structural or functional character, including a subsystem for energy.

(2) Commission Decision 2002/733/EC 2) determine the first technical specifications for the interoperability (TSI) applicable to the energy subsystem in the trans-European high-speed rail system.

(3) It is necessary to review this first TSI in the light of the technical progress and the experience gained in the implementation of it.

(4) AEIF has, as a representative body, been given a mandate to review and review the first TSI. Decision 2002/733/EC should therefore be repealed and replaced by this Decision.

(5) The Committee set up by Directive 96 /48/EC has examined the draft of the revised TSI.

(6) This TSI shall apply to new or updated and renewed infrastructure under certain conditions.

(7) This TSI is without prejudice to the provisions of other relevant TSIs which had to apply to energy subsystems.

(8) The first energy TSI for the energy subsystem came into force in 2002. Due to existing contractual obligations, new energy or interoperability constituents or upgrading and upgrading of these products should be covered by the conformity assessment in accordance with the provisions of this Directive ; first TSI, the first TSI should continue to apply to maintenance, maintenance in connection with the replacement of elements of the subsystem and interoperability constituents approved under the first TSI. Therefore, the effects of Decision 2002/733/EC should continue to be maintained in the context of the continuation of projects approved in accordance with the TSI attached to the decision, and projects on new lines or renewal or updating of a the existing line, which, on the date of notification of this Decision, is at an advanced stage, or subject to a contract being carried out. In order to establish the differences between the first TSI and the new TSI set out in the Annex to this Decision, Member States shall transmit to the Member States no later than six months after the entry into force of this Decision, a list of the subsystems and interoperability constituents, which the first TSI shall continue to apply to.

(9) This TSI does not require the application of certain technologies or technical solutions, except where this is strictly necessary for the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system.

(10) This TSI allows for a limited period of time for interoperability constituents to be incorporated into subsystems without approval if certain conditions are met.

(11) This TSI does not fully specify all the essential requirements in its present form. In accordance with Article 17 of Directive 96 /48/EC, the technical aspects which are not covered as ' outstanding ` in Annex L to this TSI are given. In accordance with Article 16 (2), The Member States shall, in Directive 96 /48/EC, communicate to the other Member States and to the Commission a list of their national technical requirements for "outstanding points" and the procedures used for conformity assessment of these measures.

(12) In relation to the specific cases described in Chapter 7 of this TSI, Member States shall communicate to the Commission and the other Member States the conformity assessment procedures which will be applied.

(13) The railway traffic of existing national, bilateral, multilateral or international agreements is regulated at this stage. It is important that these agreements do not hamper the ongoing and future development towards interoperability. That is why the Commission must examine these agreements in order to determine whether the TSI in this Decision should be revised in the light of this.

(14) The TSI is based on the best expertise available at the time when the draft has been drafted. In order to continue to encourage innovation and take account of the experience gained, the attached TSI should be reviewed periodically.

(15) This TSI opens up the possibility of innovative solutions. When proposals are made for innovative solutions, the manufacturer or the contracting entity shall set out how they deviate from the relevant section of the TSI;. The European Railway Agency will complete the required functional and interface specifications for the solution and prepare the methods of assessment.

(16) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up by Article 21 of Directive 96 /48/EC,

DECIDUON THE FOLLOWING DECISION :

ARTICLE 1

The Commission hereby adopts a technical specification for the interoperability (TSI) relating to the energy subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system.

The TSI is set out in Annex to this Decision.

ARTICLE 2

This TSI shall apply to all new, upgraded or rewed infrastructures in the trans-European high-speed rail system as defined in Annex I to Directive 96 /48/EC.

ARTICLE 3

1. The points that are categorized as "outstanding" in the Annex L of the TSI shall apply as the basis for determining whether the interoperability requirement has been met, cf. Article 16 (1). 2, in Directive 96 /48/EC, the relevant technical rules, which are in use in the Member State concerned, are authorized for the entry into service of the subsystems covered by this Decision.

2. Each Member State shall inform the other Member States and the Commission within six months of the receipt of notification of this Decision,

a) list of the list referred to in paragraph 1 1, technical rules referred to

b) the procedures for conformity assessment and verification that will be used in the application of these rules ;

c) the bodies it designates to implement these procedures for conformity assessment and verification.

ARTICLE 4

With regard to the issues referred to in Chapter 7 of the TSI, referred to as ' special cases `, the procedures for the assessment of conformity applicable to Member States. Each Member State shall inform the other Member States and the Commission within six months of receipt of notification of this Decision by the other Member States and the Commission :

a) the procedures for conformity assessment and verification that will be used in the application of these rules ;

b) the bodies it designates to implement these procedures for conformity assessment and verification ;

Article 5

The TSI provides for a transitional period during which the conformity assessment and approval of the interoperability constituents may be carried out as part of the subsystem. During this period the Member States shall inform the Commission of the interoperability constituents that have been assessed in this way so that the market for interoperability constituents can be monitored closely, and steps can be taken to promote it.

ARTICLE 6

Decision 2002/733/EC is hereby repealed. However, the provisions of this Regulation shall continue to apply to the continuation of projects approved in accordance with the present TSI, and projects on new lines and renewal or upgrading of an existing one ; The distance on the date of the notification of this Decision is at an advanced stage or covered by a contract under which it is carried out.

A list of the subsystems and interoperability constituents to which the provisions of Decision 2002 /733/EC continue to apply shall be communicated to the Commission within six months of the date of entry into force of this Decision.

Article 7

Member States shall transmit to the Commission the following types of agreements, within six months of the entry into force of the TSI :

a) flat-rate or temporary national, bilateral or multilateral agreements between Member States and one or more railway undertakings or infrastructure managers necessary because of the special or local nature of the planned train,

b) bilateral or multilateral agreements concluded between one or more railway undertakings, infrastructure managers or Member States, and which provide an essential part of local or regional interoperability,

c) international agreements concluded between one or more Member States and, at least, a third country or between one or more railway undertakings or infrastructure managers in the Member States and at least one railway undertaking ; or " infrastructure manager " in a third country and which provide an essential part of local or regional interoperability.

ARTICLE 8

This Decision shall apply from 1. October 2008.

Article 9

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6. March 2008.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXHIBIT

DIRECTIVE 96/48-INTEROPERABILITY OF THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Technical scope

This TSI relates to the energy subsystem in the trans-European high-speed rail system. The energy subsystem is one of the subsystems referred to in Annex II (1) to Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC.

According to Annex I to the Directive, high-speed lines shall be :

-WHAT? lines specially built for high-speed trains which are equipped for speeds of normally 250 km/h or more ;

-WHAT? lines specially upgraded for high-speed trains which are equipped for speeds of around 200 km/h,

-WHAT? lines specially upgraded or placed on high-speed trains having special characteristics due to topographical or environmental, terrain, or urban limitations, and where the speed must be adapted to it ; individual cases.

In this TSI, these lines are classified as category I, category II and category III respectively.

1.2. Geographical Scope

The geographical scope of this TSI is the trans-European high-speed rail system, as described in Annex I to Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC.

Reference is made to the lines of the trans-European rail network, as described in the decision of the European Parliament and of the Council. 1692 /96/EC of 23. July 1996 on the Community Guidelines on the development of the trans-European transport network or any updating of this Decision as a result of a review in accordance with Article 21 of the same Decision.

1.3. The content of the TSI

Purline to Article 5 (2), The TSI, 3, of Directive 96 /48/EC, as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, lays down the following TSI :

a) it shall specify the envisaged area of application (Chapter 2) ;

b) Whereas it lays down essential requirements for the subsystem, the energy provided for in Chapter 3, and its interfaces to other sub-systems (Chapter 4) ;

c) it shall determine the functional and technical specifications of the subsystem and interfaces to other subsystems as required.

d) it determines the interoperability constituents and the interfaces to be drawn up European specifications, including European standards, which are necessary to achieve interoperability in the trans-European Community ; high-speed rail rail system (Chapter 5) ;

(e) it shall indicate in individual cases the procedures to be used to assess the conformity or suitability for use of the interoperability constituents or the use of the EC verification of the subsystems (Chapter 6) ;

(f) it shall specify the strategy for implementing this TSI (Chapter 7) ;

g) specify the conditions for the staff concerned in respect of professional qualifications, health and safety at work and maintenance of the subsystem in question and in the application of the TSI (Chapter 4).

In addition, Article 6 (1) may be subject to the following : The provisions of paragraph 3 shall be those laid down in Chapter 7 of each TSI.

Finally, the provisions of this TSI shall contain the provisions of Chapter 4 of the TSI for the scope specified in the above headings 1.1 and 1.2.

2. DEFINITION / SCOPING OF THE SUBSYSTEM

2.1. Scope of application

In the TSI for energy, the requirements for interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system shall be specified in the TSI. This TSI covers the infrastructure-based part of the energy subsystem and part of the maintenance subsystem relating to the infrastructure-based part of the energy subsystem. The energy subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system shall be made up of all fixed installations, which, in accordance with the essential requirements, are necessary to provide the trains from single or three fared high voltage networks.

The Energy subsystem also includes a definition and quality criteria for interaction between pantograph and air-queue release (hereinafter referred to as the point of the queue).

The energy subsystem consists of :

-WHAT? distribution stations : on the primary side are connected to the high voltage network, converting the high voltage to a voltage and / or conversion to a power supply system suitable for the trains. On the second page, the distribution stations are connected to the railway overhead contact line ;

-WHAT? sectionings : electrical equipment located between the distribution stations to provide and parallel wired the catenary and in order to divide it into protection zones, sectionate it and provide auxiliary power supply ;

-WHAT? Driving system : a system that distributes the energy to trains running on the line and transfers it to trains through pantographs. The cooling line system is also equipped with manual or remote control conductors for the isolation of sections or groups of overhead contact lines, depending on the operational requirements. Whereas the cuts are part of the overhead contact line ;

-WHAT? return circuits : all leaders who make up the planned road for the traction flow and the flow of error conditions. In the case of this aspect, the return circuits are part of the energy subsystem and have an interface for the infrastructure subsystem ;

Pantographs transfer electrical energy from the contact line to the train on which they are fitted. The pantograph is built into and used on the train and is covered by the TSI for rolling stock. The interaction between the pantograph and the overhead contact line shall be specified in this TSI.

2.2. Definition of the subsystem

2.2.1. Electrification System

A traction unit is-like any electrical device-designed to operate properly when it is connected to the nominal voltage and frequency to its connection points (i.e. pantograph (s) and wheel (s). Variations and limits must be defined in order to ensure the expected performance of trains.

High-speed train and must use a similar high impact. In order to provide energy for the trains with at least possible losses due to resistance, a high supply voltage is required and (thus) a lower flow rate. The power supply system shall be designed in such a way as to ensure that all trains are supplied with the required power. For this reason, the cost of the individual trains and the roadmap are critical to the performance.

Modern trains can often regenerative braking and return energy to the power supply, thereby reducing the overall power consumption. Therefore, the power supply system must be designed in such a way that it may be able to receive energy from regenerative braking.

In any electrical system there may be short circuits and other error conditions. The electrical system must be made so that the control subsystem detects these errors immediately and initiates measures that can unplug the short circuit circuit and isolate the defective part of the circuit. Following such an event, the electrical system must be able to recover supplies to all installations as soon as possible so that the operation can be resumed.

2.2.2. Geometry of the cooling release and pantograph

A compatible geometry for the contact wire and the pantograph are an important aspect of interoperability. With regard to the geometrical interaction, the contact line must be given above the rails, the transverse displacement in windwind air and at wind pressure and the contact force. The geometry of the pantograph is also important in order to ensure good interaction with the overhead contact line, taking into account the fluctuations of the vehicle.

2.2.3. Interaction between the cooling release and pantograph

In the high speeds which are relying on the trans-European high-speed rail system, the interaction between the contact wire and the pantograph is a very important aspect of the establishment of a reliable power supply without undue delay ; effects on railway installations and the environment. The interaction is determined most objectively

-WHAT? static and aerodynamic effects depending on the nature of the contact pieces of the pantograph and the design of the pantograph, the shape of the vehicle on which the pantograph (s) are fitted and the pantograph position on the cart,

-WHAT? the compatibility of contact materials with the contact line,

-WHAT? the dynamic characteristics of the running wire and pantograph ;

-WHAT? the protection of the pantograph and the running wire equipment where one of the contact pieces of the pantograph is broken ;

-WHAT? the number of pantographs used and the distance between these, as a pantograph may cause interference for the others on the same section of the overhead contact line.

2.2.4. Tall times between high-speed lines and other lines

Different requirements will apply along a stretch of distance. The transition between lines with different requirements affects the energy supply and running power system and is therefore an aspect to be dealt with in the TSI for energy.

2.3. Connections to other subsystems and to other parts of the subsystem itself

2.3.1. Introduction

The energy subsystem has a connection with other subsystems in the trans-European high-speed rail system in order to achieve the expected performance. These links are covered by the definition of interfaces and performance criteria.

2.3.2. Connections on the electrification system

-WHAT? Voltage and frequency and their permissible areas are connected to the rolling stock subsystem.

-WHAT? The power that is installed on the lines and the power of the specified power factor determines the performance of the interoperable railway system for high-speed trains and interfaces with the rolling stock subsystem.

-WHAT? Regenerative braking reduces energy consumption and interfaces with the rolling stock subsystem.

-WHAT? Electrical installations and traction equipment provided shall be ensured against short circuits. Enabling breakers on spreading stations and trains must be coordinated. Electric protection interfaces in relation to the rolling stock subsystem.

-WHAT? Electrical disturbance and harmonious emissions interface with the rolling stock and train control and signalling subsystem.

2.3.3. Connections on overhead contact line equipment and pantograph

-WHAT? In the case of high-speed lines, particular attention must be paid to the height of the contact wire to avoid excessive wear. The contact wire height has interfaces with the infrastructure subsystem and rolling stock.

-WHAT? The unit of the carriage and the pantograph system has an interface with the infrastructure subsystem.

2.3.4. Links related to interaction between the overhead contact line and pantograph

The quality of the pantograph system depends on the number of pantographs that are in use, the distance between them and the traction unit. The location of the pantograph has interfaces with the energy subsystem.

2.3.5. Connections to phase and system separation sections

-WHAT? In order to allow trains pass over between electrified systems and phase separation sections without forming a connection between (short) the different systems and phases, the number and location of pantographs on the trains must be specified. This has an interface for the rolling stock subsystem.

-WHAT? In order to allow trains pass over between electrified systems and phase separation sections without forming a connection between (short) the different systems and phases, the flow of trains is needed. This has interfaces for the train subsystem, train control and signalling

-WHAT? When passing through sections to the system of system separation, it may be necessary to reduce pantograph (s). This has interfaces for the train subsystem, train control and signalling

3. ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1. General

Within the scope of this TSI, the conformity of the specifications described as follows :

-WHAT? Chapter 4 of the subsystem,

-WHAT? Chapter 5 of the interoperability constituents, which have been demonstrated by a positive result of the evaluation of :

-WHAT? conformity and / or suitability for use of interoperability constituent ;

-WHAT? and verification of the subsystem,

as described in Chapter 6, the fulfils of the relevant essential requirements quoted in section 3.2 and 3.3 of this TSI shall be provided.

If, however, some of the essential requirements are met by means of national rules due to :

-WHAT? items outstanding in the TSI, or points made, with reservations,

-WHAT? the derogation provided for in Article 7 of Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC,

-WHAT? special cases, as mentioned in the present TSI, section 7.4,

the corresponding conformity assessment shall be carried out in accordance with the procedures laid down under the responsibility of the Member State concerned.

In accordance with Directive 96 /48/EC, Article 4 (4), 1, the trans-European high-speed rail system, its subsystems and interoperability constituents shall meet the essential requirements as set out in Annex III to this Directive.

3.2. Essential requirements for the energy subsystem

The essential requirements include :

-WHAT? security

-WHAT? reliability and availability ;

-WHAT? health,

-WHAT? environmental protection,

-WHAT? technical compatibility.

3.3. Specific aspects of the energy subsystem

3.3.1. Security

According to Annex III to Directive 96 /44/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the following essential requirements shall apply to security :

1.1.1. The design, construction or manufacture and the maintenance and surveillance of security-critical parts, including in particular parts that affect the transport of trains on the Net, shall guarantee a level of security corresponding to the objectives that are the objectives of the trains ; established for the network, including under specified fraudal conditions.

1.1.2. The parameters related to the contact between wheels and track shall follow the driving stability criteria necessary to ensure that safe journeys can be guaranteed at the maximum allowable speed.

1.1.3. The components used must be able to withstand normal and specified exceptional effects during their lifetime. Appropriate means shall be provided to ensure that the event that the event is not limited is limited to safety.

1.1.4. Fixed installations and rolling stock shall be designed and materials chosen to limit the generation, diversification and effects of fire and smoke in the event of fire.

1.1.5. Any arrangements designed to become a passenger of the passengers must be so designed so that, but predictably, predictive controls do not result in a safety-related risk.

The aspects of 1.1.2 and 1.1.5 are not relevant to the energy subsystem.

In order to meet the essential requirements 1.1.1, 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 above, the energy subsystem must be designed and constructed so that the requirements of Point 4.2.4, 4.2.7, 4.2.9 through 4.2.16, 4.2.18 to 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.4.4.4.4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, the interoperability constituents used are in accordance with the requirements of section 5.4.1.1 to 5.4.1.5, 5.4.1.7 to 5.4.1.9 and 5.4.1.11.

The following essential safety requirements as set out in Annex III of Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC are of particular relevance to the energy subsystem.

2.2.1. The operation of energy supply systems must not prejudice the safety of either high-speed rail or persons (users, operating staff, tenants along the rail lines or third parties).

For the purpose of meeting the essential requirement 2.2.1 above, the energy subsystem must be designed and constructed so that the requirements of 4.2.4 to 4.2.7, 4.2.18, 4.2.20 to 4.2.25, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.2, and 4.7.1 to 4.7.4 are complied with, and the used interoperability constituents comply with the requirements of section 5.4.1.2, 5.4.1.3, 5.4.1.5, 5.4.1.8 to 5.4.1.11.

3.3.2. Business continuity and availability

According to Annex III to Directive 96 /44/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the following essential requirements for reliability and availability ("reliability and availability") are as follows :

1.2. The monitoring and maintenance of fixed or mobile components involved in train traffic must be organised, carried out and quantified in such a way as to remain functional under specified conditions.

In order to comply with the essential requirements the essential requirement 1.2, the energy subsystem must be maintained in such a way that the requirements of Section 4.2.7, 4.2.18, 4.4.2, 4.5 are complied with.

3.3.3. Health

According to Annex III to Directive 96 /44/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the following essential requirements for health are :

1.3.1. Materials must not be used in trains and railway infrastructures which, by virtue of the way they are applied, could pose a health hazard to persons who are to be caught or stay in there.

1.3.2. The materials must be chosen, treated and used in such a way as to limit harmful or dangerous vapors or gases, particularly in the event of fire.

For the purpose of meeting the essential requirements 1.3.1 and 1.3.2, the energy subsystem must be designed and constructed so that the requirements of points 4.2.11, 4.5, 4.7.1 to 4.7.4 are fulfilled and the interoperability constituents used are in accordance with the requirements ; in item 5.4.1.4.

3.3.4. Environmental protection

According to Annex III to Directive 96 /44/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the following essential requirements shall apply to environmental protection :

1.4.1. The environmental impact of the establishment and operation of the trans-European high-speed rail system shall be assessed and taken into account in the design of the system in accordance with the Community provisions in force.

1.4.2. Materials in trains and infrastructures must not result in the rendering of environmentally harmful or dangerous fumes or gases, particularly in the event of fire.

1.4.3. The rolling stock and energy supply systems must be designed and manufactured so that they are electromagnetic compatible with installations, facilities and public and private networks, which are at risk of interference.

In order to meet the essential requirements 1.4.1, 1.4.2 and 1.4.3, the energy subsystem shall be designed and constructed so that the requirements of 4.2.4 to 4.2.6, 4.2.8, 4.2.11, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.22, 4.2.24, 4.2.24, 4.2.24, 4.2.24 and 4.7.1 to 4.7.3 are complied with ; and the interoperability constituents used are in accordance with the requirements of section 5.4.1.2, 5.4.16, 5.4.1.7 and 5.4.1.9 to 5.4.1.11.

The following essential requirements for environmental protection in accordance with Annex III of Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC are of particular relevance to the Energy subsystem :

2.2.2. The operating system of electricity supply systems must not result in environmental pollution beyond the specified limits.

In order to meet the essential requirements 2.2.2, the energy subsystem must be designed and constructed so that the requirements of points 4.2.6, 4.2.8, 4.2.8, 4.2.12, 4.2.16 and 4.7.1 to 4.7.3 are fulfilled and the interoperability constituents used are in compliance with the requirements of the interoperability constituents and the interoperability constituents used. with the requirements of section 5.4.1.2, 5.4.1.6, 5.4.1.9 to 5.4.1.11.

3.3.5. Technical compatibility

According to Annex III to Directive 96 /44/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the following essential requirements for technical compatibility shall be as follows :

1.5. The technical specifications of the infrastructure and the fixed installations must be compatible with each other and with the specifications of the trains to be taken on the trans-European high-speed rail system.

When it is found in parts of the network that it is difficult to comply with these specifications, temporary solutions can be used that guarantee future compatibility.

In order to meet the essential requirement 1.5, the energy subsystem must be designed and constructed so that the requirements of 4.2.1 to 4.2.4, 4.2.6, 4.2.9 to 4.2.25, 4.4.2, 4.5 and 4.7.1 to 4.7.3 are fulfilled and the interoperability constituents used to be used. are in accordance with the requirements of section 5.4.1.1 to 5.4.1.11.

The following essential requirements for technical compatibility in accordance with Annex III to Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC are of particular relevance to the energy subsystem :

2.2.3. The electrical supply system used on the trans-European high-speed rail system shall :

-WHAT? make it possible for trains to provide the specified performance ;

-WHAT? be compatible with the pantographs that the trains are equipped with.

In order to meet the essential requirement 2.2.3, the energy subsystem must be designed and constructed so that the requirements of 4.2.1 to 4.2.4, 4.2.9, 4.2.11 to 4.2.22 and 4.5 are fulfilled and the interoperability constituents used are in conformity with the requirements of 4.2.22 and 4.5. with the requirements set out in 5.4.1.1 to 5.4.1.11 ;

3.3.6. Maintenance

According to Annex III to Directive 96 /44/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the following essential requirements shall apply to maintenance :

2.5.1. The technical installations and processes used in preparation centres and workshops shall not constitute a risk to human health.

2.5.2. The technical installations and the procedures used in preparation centres and workshops shall not exceed the permitted level of genes for the surrounding environment.

2.5.3. Maintenance facilities for conventional rolling stock shall provide for the possibility of implementing the safety, hygiene and comfort procedures of all the equipment for which they are projected.

The aspects of 2.5.3 are not relevant to the energy subsystem.

For the energy subsystem, the maintenance is not carried out at the provision of provision, but on the line. Maintenance shall be performed by maintenance units and the requirements of 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 shall apply to them. For the purpose of meeting the essential requirements 2.5.1 and 2.5.2, the interoperability constituent of the energy subsystem shall be designed and constructed in such a way as to ensure that the requirements of 4.2.8, 4.5 and 4.7.4 are met.

3.3.7. Operating conditions

According to Annex III to Directive 96 /44/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the following essential requirements for operating conditions are as follows :

2.7.1. The provision of coherence in the rules governing the operation of the network and for the qualifications of train drivers and train personnel must guarantee a secure international operation.

Maintenance procedures and frequency, maintenance staff and control centre staff training and qualifications and quality assurance systems in the maintenance establishments of the relevant operating establishments concerned and shall provide a guarantee of a high level of security.

2.7.2. Maintenance procedures and frequency, maintenance staff and control centre staff training and qualifications and quality assurance systems in the control and maintenance centres of the relevant operating establishments shall be required to : provide a guarantee of a high operating security and availability level for the system.

2.7.3. The provision of coherence in the rules governing operations on the networks and the drivers, train staff and traffic management skills must ensure the effective operation of the trans-European high-speed rail system.

For the energy subsystem, the maintenance is not carried out at the provision of provision, but on the line. Maintenance is performed by maintenance units. For the purpose of meeting the essential requirements 2.7.1 and 2.7.3, the energy and interoperability constituent must be designed and constructed in such a way as to design the requirements of 4.2.4, 4.2.21 to 4.2.23, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.1 to 4.7.44.2.8, 4.5, and 4.7.4 is fulfilled.

3.4. Comprehensive table of essential requirements

The provisions of each of the essential requirements set out in Table 3.4 below, if an X in the column is listed, the essential requirement shall be subject to the provision which has been mentioned on the left.

Table 3.4

4. CHARACTERISATION OF THE SUBSYSTEM

4.1. Introduction

The trans-European high-speed rail system, for which Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC is applicable and the energy subsystem forms part of the system, an integrated system is to be checked. The composite shall be checked in particular with regard to the specifications of the subsystem, its interface to the system as part of the subsystem, and operational and maintenance rules.

The functional and technical specifications of the subsystem and interfaces as described in sections 4.2 and 4.3 require only the use of specific technology or technical solutions in which it is strictly necessary for the interoperability of the system ; trans-European high-speed rail system. However, innovative solutions for interoperability can require new specifications and / or new methods of assessment. In order to provide space for technological innovation, these specifications and methods of assessment must be developed in accordance with the process described in sections 6.1.2.3 and 6.2.2.2.

In the light of all the essential requirements, the energy subsystem is characterised by the energy specifications in points 4.2 to 4.8.

In the case of special cases, reference is made to Chapter 7.4 ; where reference is made to EN standards, any variants with the designation ' national exceptions ' or ' special national conditions ` shall be referred to in EN not apply. In the case of EN-regulation comprehensive tables, the column headings HS, UP and Conn respectively are category I, II and III respectively.

4.2. Functional and technical specifications of the parts system

4.2.1. General provisions

The performance level to be achieved with the energy subsystem shall correspond to the relevant benefit level as specified for the individual line categories on the trans-European high-speed rail system as regards :

-WHAT? the maximum line speed, and

-WHAT? the power requirements of the trains at the pantograph.

The design of the energy subsystem shall ensure the specified performance level.

In a short part of the line connecting a high-speed line with a different route, the infrastructure manager shall define the position in which the requirements of the energy TSI for the energy TSI for high-speed lines are beginning to apply.

4.2.2. Voltage and frequency

Wood-based units need standardized values for voltage and frequency. Table 4.2.2 contains a list of the nominal voltage and nominal frequencies in the energy supply systems to be used, depending on the line category.

Table 4.2.2

Nominal voltage and frequency with corresponding line categories

1) In Member States with an electrified network of AC 15 KV 16,7 Hz, the system may be allowed to be used for new category I lines. It may be possible for the same system to be used in adjacent countries when it can be justified by the Member State of the Member State. In this case, there is no need for any assessment.

2) It may be permitted that the DC 3 kV commissary is used in Italy, Spain and Poland to existing and new sections of category I lines for speeds of 250 km/h when electrification with AC 25 kV 50 Hz can create a risk of disrupting the signalling equipment. along the line and on an existing line.

The voltage and frequency of the distribution stations and at the pantograph shall be in accordance with EN 50163:2004, furkt. 4. The nominal voltage and frequency shall be shown in the register of infrastructure. Annex D to this TSI contains the parameters for the infrastructure register that are relevant to the energy subsystem. The conformity must be documented in the form of a design examination.

4.2.3. The system's performance level and the power of the system

The energy subsystem shall be designed in such a way that it satisfies the required level of performance as regards :

-WHAT? line speed,

-WHAT? the minimum clearance level,

-WHAT? the maximum train flow,

-WHAT? the power factor of trains,

-WHAT? roadmap and planned insertion,

-WHAT? the average voltage of pantograph,

in accordance with the line category concerned.

The infrastructure manager shall establish the line speed and maximum train flow in the infrastructure register (see Annex D). The design of the energy subsystem shall ensure that the power supply is able to achieve the specified performance level.

The calculated mean voltage at the pantograph shall be in accordance with EN 50388:2005, point. On the basis of the design information for the power factor in EN 50388:2005, 8.3 and 8.4, starting with the design information for the power factor. 6 with the exception of the recommendation of trains in workshops or on the side tracks for which the specification in the HS TSI RST (2006), point. 4.2.8.3.3 is applicable. The conformity assessment must be carried out in accordance with EN 50388:2005, furtive. 14.4.1, 14.4.2 (sim only) and 14.4.3.

4.2.4. Regenerative braking

AC power supply systems must be designed in such a way that it is possible to use regenerative braking as a service brake that may seamlessly be able to exchange power with other trains or otherwise. The control and protection devices on the distribution stations must allow for regenerative braking.

It is not necessary for the DC power supply system to provide the ability to use regenerative braking as a service brake. However, when this is allowed, it must be entered in the register of infrastructure.

The fixed installations and their protective devices must allow for regenerative braking devices unless the conditions in EN 50388:2005 are furtive. 12.1.1 is applicable. Conformity assessment for fixed installations must be carried out in accordance with EN 50388:2005, furtive. 14.7.2.

4.2.5. Harmonic emission to the public electricity supply network

Harmonic emission to the public electricity supply network shall be managed by the infrastructure manager taking into account European or national standards and the requirements of the energy supply undertaking.

No conformity assessment is required in this TSI.

4.2.6. External electromagnetic compatibility

External electromagnetic compatibility is not a specific feature of the trans-European high-speed network. Energy supply installations shall comply with EN 50121-2 and EN 1997 in order to comply with all requirements for electromagnetic compatibility.

No conformity assessment is required in this TSI.

4.2.7. Continuation of power supply in the event of disturbances

The power supply and operating system shall be designed in order to ensure continued operation in the event of disturbance. This can be achieved by wrapping the drive system into supply sections and installing redundant equipment on distribution stations.

Conformity assessment shall be carried out at the control of the circuit diagrams. It must be demonstrated that the equipment to ensure continued power supply in accordance with the design is installed.

4.2.8. Environmental protection

Environmental protection is subject to other European legislation concerning the assessment of the impact of certain projects on the environment.

No conformity assessment is required in this TSI.

4.2.9. The line of meat

4.2.9.1. Total Project

The construction of the contact line shall be in accordance with EN 50119:2001, furkt. 5.1, 5.2.1.2, 5.2.4.1 to 5.2.4.8, 5.2.6, 5.2.7, 5.2.7, 5.2.8.2, 5.2.10, 5.2.11 and 5.2.12. For the construction and operation of the overhead contact line, it is assumed that the pantographs are equipped with an automatic sating device (see rolling stock TSI). 4.2.8.3.6.4 and 4.2.8.3.8.4).

Additional requirements for high-speed lines are specified below.

4.2.9.2. Geometry of the contact wire

The contact line must be designed for use with pantographs with a geometry of the pantograph-head that is specified in a furtive. 4.2.8.3.7.2 of the TSI for rolling stock, and as specified in the rolling stock TSI

The height of the line, the gradient of the contact wire relative to the track and lateral displacement of the contact wire under the influence of the lateral wind is all factors that determine the coherence of the trans-European network. The allowable data for the geometry of the contact wire shall be specified in Table 4.2.9.

Table 4.2.9

Allowed data for the geometry of the overhead contact line

The displacement of the contact wire under the influence of the lateral wind shall be calculated for the contact wire height above 5300 mm and / or on a traction track. It shall be calculated as half of the width of the dynamic intersection of the European pantograph, L2. L2 is calculated according to EN 50367:2006 Annex A. 3.

The overhead contact line and wind speed where no restrictions are possible must be entered in the Infrastructure Register (see Annex D).

For the lines referred to in Table 4.2.2 note (2), the nominal height of the contact line shall be between 5000 mm and 5300 mm.

Lines in Category II and III :

The nominal height of the contact wire may be higher on lines of mixed goods and passenger traffic to enable vehicles with a profile to be transported, but the maximum height of the contact wire in Table 4.2.9 shall not be exceeded. The quality requirements for the pantograph are maintained (see 4.2.16).

In the case of rail crossings open to road traffic (not allowed on the Category I line) the contact line must be fixed according to national rules or, in the absence of national rules, EN 50122-1:1997 pkt. 4.1.2.3 and 5.1.2.3.

All lines

Conformity assessment shall be carried out by means of a design examination and measurements before commissioning according to EN 50119:2001, furkt. 8.5.1.

4.2.10. Flesh system compliance with the structure gauge

The construction of the overhead contact wire system shall be in accordance with the structure gauge defined in the case of the vehicle. 4.2.3 of the TSI for the high-speed infrastructure TSI. The design of the overhead contact line equipment shall comply with the dynamic framework of the vehicles. The profile to be complied with must be identified in the Infrastructure Register (see Annex D).

The profiles of the infrastructure must take into account sufficient distance to be given to the pantographs that are in contact with the contact line equipment and for the installation of the overhead contact line. Measurements of tunnels and other structures must be compatible with the geometry of contact lines and the dynamic vehicle frame of the pantograph. In the TSI for rolling stock. 4.2.3.1 specifies the reference profile of the pantograph. The space required for the installation of the overhead contact line shall be indicated by the infrastructure manager.

Conformity assessment must be carried out within the energy subsystem in the form of a design examination.

4.2.11. Flesh Material

Permitted materials for running threads are copper and copper alloys. The contact thread shall be in accordance with the requirements of EN 50149:2001 pkt. 4.1 to 4.3 and 4.5 to 4.8.

Conformity assessment shall be carried out in the form of a design examination and during the production phase of the overhead contact line.

4.2.12. Wave speed for the overhead contact line

The speed of wave propagation in the overhead contact lines is a characteristic argument for the assessment of the suitability of the overhead contact line for high-speed operation. This parameter depends on the weight and material voltage of the contact wire. The wave frequency must be adapted so that the selected line speed is not higher than 70% of the wave speed of the wave.

Conformity assessment must be carried out in the form of a design examination.

4.2.13. (not applied)

4.2.14. Static contact force

The static contact force is defined in EN 50206-1:1998 pkt. 3.3.5 and shall be carried out by the pantograph on the contact wire. The contact wire must be designed for a static contact force as specified in Table 4.2.14.

Table 4.2.14

Static contact force

In DC 1,5 kV systems, the overhead contact line must be designed to withstand a static contact force of 140 N per pantograph to avoid overheating of the overhead contact wire when a train keeps with the auxiliary devices engaged.

Conformity assessment must be carried out in the form of a design examination and measurements carried out in accordance with EN 50317:2002.

4.2.15. Average Contact Force

The mean contact force Fm is formed by the static and aerodynamic components of the power pantograph contact force, with dynamic correction. Fm represents a target value to be achieved to ensure the current quality of the pantograph without any unnecessary cursion and to limit the tread and dangerous situations in the contact pieces.

The mean contact force Fm that a pantograph carries on the overhead contact wire is displayed as a function of the operating speed in Figure 4.2.15.1 for AC lines and figure 4.2.15.2 for DC lines. The contact wire must be designed so that it can withstand the power curve of all pantographs on a train.

The maximum force (Fmax) of an open line is normally within the range of Fm plus three standard deviations ; higher values may occur elsewhere.

In the case of speeds over 320 km/h, the average contact force values are not specified in the TSI'en; there is a need for additional specifications and these specifications are an outstanding item. In this case, national provisions shall apply.

A conformity assessment must be carried out in accordance with EN 50317:2002, furtive. 6 for AC and DC systems at speeds over 50 mph.

Figure 4.2.15.1

Average contact force Fm for AC systems as a function of speed

On new lines and when upgrading existing lines in all categories, the curve C shall be used.

In addition, new lines may be authorised for use of pantographs under C1 or C2 curves. Existing lines may necessitates the use of pantographs following curve C1 or C2 ; the curve used must be entered in the register of infrastructure.

4.2.15.2

Average contact force Fm for DC systems as a function of speed

4.2.16. Dynamic behaviour and quality of the pantograph

4.2.16.1. Claim

The contact wire must be designed in accordance with the dynamic behaviour requirements. The line of overhead contact line at the approved line speed shall comply with the provisions of Table 4.2.16.

The quality of the pantograph is essential for the life of the driving cycle, and must therefore comply with agreed and measurative parameters.

The compliance of the requirements for dynamic behaviour must be checked according to EN 50367:2006, point. 7.2 in the assessment of :

-WHAT? The line of the contact wire and either :

-WHAT? the mean contact force Fm and the standard deviation, or,

-WHAT? Percentage of arcing

The Procuring Entity shall report the use of the control method. The values to be achieved by using the selected method are specified in Table 4.2.16.

Table 4.2.16

Requirements for dynamic behaviour and the quality of the pantograph

Definitions, values, and test methods are in EN 50317:2002 and EN 50318:2002.

S0 is the calculated, simulated or measured haemo of the contact wire at a side holding which occurs under normal operating conditions with one or more pantographs with a mean contact force Fm at the maximum line speed. When the cover of the side holder is physically restricted because of the design of the overhead contact wire, it is permitted to reduce the necessary space to 1,5 S0 (see. A 50119:2001 pkt. 5.2.1.3).

Fm is the dynamically corrected statistical mean value for the contact force.

4.2.16.2. Conformity test

4.2.16.2.1. Interoperability constituent the line of the line

A new construction of the overhead contact line shall be tested at simulation according to EN 50318:2002 and by measuring the test section of the new construction according to EN 50317:2002.

The simulations must be carried out using at least two different interoperable pantographs ; 1) for the system in question, up to the projected speed of the pantograph and the projected interoperability constituent. The overhead line for both a single pantograph and several pantographs with a range of each distance according to Table 4.2.19. In order to be acceptable, the simulated pantograph quantity must be simulated within the limits of table 4.2.16 in respect of hautation, mean contact force and standard deviation for each of the pantographs.

Where the results of the simulation are acceptable, a test shall be carried out on a representative section of the new contact line with one of the pantographs used for the simulation, which is mounted on a train or a locomotive that is produced by a mean contact force at the planned, projected speed as required in point. 4.2.15, when applied to one of the driving power systems. In order to be accepted, the measurement of the pantograph must be located within the limits of table 4.2.16.

If all of the above tests are passed, the test drive shall be deemed to have been approved and may be used on lines where the characteristics of the design corresponds to the line requirements. This aspect is covered by this TSI.

4.2.16.2.2. Interoperability constituent pantograph

In addition to the requirements for the pantograph of the rolling stock TSI, a new construction of the pantograph shall be tested in accordance with EN 50318:2002.

The simulas must be carried out using at least two interoperable overhead contact lines ; 2) for the relevant system at the projected speed of the pantograph. The simulated pantograph-based quality must be within the limits of Table 4.2.16 as regards hautation, mean contact force and standard deviation for each driver's contact line.

If the results of the simulation are acceptable, a practical test shall be carried out by means of a representative section of one of the overhead contact lines used for the simulation ; the interaction properties must be measured according to EN 50317:2002. The pantograph shall be mounted on a train or locomotive to produce an average contact force as required by the pantry. 4.2.15 for the projected speed of the pantograph. The measured pantograph-quality must be within the limits of table 4.2.16.

If all tests are passed, the design of the tested pantograph shall be deemed to be approved and may be used for different structures of the rolling stock if the means of the mean contact force for the rolling stock is in accordance with ; the requirements of the furtive. 4.2.16.1. This aspect is covered by the TSI for rolling stock.

4.2.16.2.3. Interoperability constituent the overhaul of a newly-planted line (integration into a subsystem)

If the contact wire to be installed on a new high-speed line is certified as an interoperability constituent, the measurements of the interaction parameters according to EN 50317:2002 must be used to verify that the installation is correct. These measurements must be carried out with a pantograph, which is an interoperability constituent and mounted on rolling stock, resulting in an average contact force as required in point. 4.2.15 of this TSI for the planned, projected speed. The main purpose of this test is to identify design errors, but not to assess the fundamental nature of the design. The installed queue release can be accepted if the results of the measurements are in accordance with the requirements of Table 4.2.16. This aspect is covered by this TSI.

4.2.16.2.4. IK pantograph built-in in new rolling stock

When an approved interoperability constituent pantograph is to be mounted in new rolling stock, the test must be limited to the mean contact force. The tests must be carried out in accordance with EN 50317:2002 or EN 50206-1:1998 ; 3) These tests must be carried out in both directions and within the range of nominal contact lines to which the application is requested. The measured results shall follow the average curve plotted with at least five speed intervals for class 1 trains and at least 3 speed intervals for Class 2 trains. The results shall be in accordance with the curves of the entire speed range of the entire car within a range of :

-WHAT? + 0,-10% for AC kurve C

-WHAT? + 0%,-10% for an AC C1 curve (C1 are upper limit)

-WHAT? + 10%, 0% for an AC C2 curve (C2 is the lower limit of the crate)

-WHAT? +/-10% for both DC curves

If the samples are made available, the pantograph fitted to the train or locomotive shall be used on interoperable high-speed lines. This aspect is covered by the TSI for rolling stock.

4.2.16.2.5. Statistical calculations and simulations

The calculation of statistical values must be in line with the speed of the line and must be carried out separately for sections of the free and in tunnels. In the case of simulation, the control sections must be defined so that they are representative and include features such as tunnels, transfers, neutral sections, and so on.

4.2.17. Vertical offset of the point of contact

The contact point is the point where there is mechanical contact between a contact sheet and a meat release.

The contact point ' s vertical height above the track shall be as uniform as possible over the range of voltage ; this is important for the collection of high quality pantograph.

The maximum difference between the highest and lowest dynamic height of the contact point within a range of voltage must be less than the values in Table 4.2.17.

This must be checked by means of measurements according to EN 50317:2002 or simulations validated according to EN 50318:2002 :

-WHAT? for the maximum line speed of the running wire,

-WHAT? for the use of the mean contact force Fm (see point. 4.2.15),

-WHAT? for the highest range of buckles.

This does not need to be checked for overlapping straps or straddles over the switches ;

Table 4.2.17

Vertical offset of the point of contact

4.2.18. Radiation system power capacity : AC and DC systems, trains in motion

The power capacity must be in accordance with the requirements for trains according to EN 50388:2005, point. 7.1. The information in EN 50149:2001 shall be used in the design process.

The heat effect on the overhead system shall depend on the current subtractor flow and the period during which the current is drawn. Side wind has a cooling effect. The most intransient wind conditions for which the power capacity calculation is based must be specified by the Procuring Entity.

The construction of the overhead contact wire system shall ensure that the maximum leather-temperatures specified in EN 50119:2001, Annex B, shall not be exceeded, taking into account the information contained in EN 50149:2001, point. 4.5, Table 3 and 4 and the requirements of EN 50119:2001 pkt. 5.2.9. A design examination must be carried out in order to confirm that the overhead contact line is in accordance with the requirements specified.

Conformity assessment must be carried out in the form of a design examination.

4.2.19. Distance between pantographs in the design of the overhead contact line

The contact wire must be designed to operate at a maximum line speed with two functional pantographs with a distance between the lines as specified in Table 4.2.19 :

Table 4.2.19

Distance between pantographs

Conformity assessment must be carried out by verifying compliance with the requirements for dynamic behaviour as defined in point. 4.2.16.

4.2.20. Power capacity, DC systems, persistent trains

The cooling line for DC systems must be designed to handle 300 A at 1,5 kV and 200 A at 3.0 kV, per pantograph (see Annex D).

Allowed temperatures are an outstanding point

Without further requirements, the temperature of the contact wire must not exceed the limits of EN 50119:2001, Annex B. The line of contact shall be tested by means of the methods indicated in EN 50367:2006, Annex A. 4.1.

A conformity assessment must be carried out in accordance with EN 50367:2006, furkt. 6.2.

4.2.21. Sections for phase separation

The construction of phase separation sections shall ensure that interoperable trains (see the rolling stock TSI) of the TSI shall be furtive. 4.2.8.3.6.2) can move from a section to adjacent, without the two phases being merged.

There must be appropriate measures to enable a train that has been stopped in the phase separation section, may be restarted. The neutral section must be able to be attached to the adjacent sections using a remote arcasing obssure. The infrastructure register shall include information on the construction of phase separation sections (see Annex D).

Categories of category I

Two types of phase separation constructs may be used, either :

-WHAT? A phase separation design where all pantographs on the longest interoperable trains are located in the neutral section. Length of the neutral section must be at least 402 m. For detailed requirements, reference is made to EN 50367:2006, Annex A. 1.3, or

-WHAT? a shorter phase separation with three isolated overlaps, as shown in EN 50367:2006, Annex A. 1.5. The total length of this separation is less than 142 m, including parallelled overlaps and tolerances.

Lines of category II and III

On the grounds of expenditure or topographical constraints, it may be possible to apply different solutions.

For sections II and III sections, separation sections may be used as specified for the lines of category I or a construction, according to Figure 4.2.21. For Figure 4.2.21, the middle section shall be connected to the return road of the stream and the neutral sections (d) can be made out of stangiers or dual arterial parcels, and the dimensions must be as follows :

D ≤ 8 m

The length of the d must be selected in accordance with the system voltage, the maximum line speed and the maximum width of the pantograph.

If the separation sections required for the lines of the category I or the separation section of the figure 4.2.21 are not applicable, the infrastructure manager shall provide for appropriate procedures or a design to enable the infrastructure manager to provide the possibility for : passage of trains complying with the TSI for rolling stock. Where an alternative solution is proposed, the alternative must be shown that the alternative is at least as reliable.

Figure 4.2.21

Separation section with insulators

The information on the construction of phase separation sections shall be entered in the Infrastructure Register (see Annex D).

In the construction of phase separation sections, a conformity assessment must be carried out in the assessment of the Energy subsystem.

4.2.22. System Segregation Sections

4.2.22.1. General

The construction of system separation sections shall ensure that interoperable trains (see the rolling stock TSI) of the TSI shall be furtive. 4.2.8.3.6.2) can move from a power supply system to an adjacent power supply system without the two systems being merged.

There are two possibilities for train passage of system separation sections :

a) with swolored pantographs and connection to the overhead contact line ;

b) with lowered pantographs and without connection to the contact line.

Infrastructure managers, which adjacent to each other, must agree either (a) or (b) in accordance with the applicable circumstances. This selection shall be entered in the Infrastructure Register (see Annex D).

4.2.22.2. Raised pantographs

If the system separation section is roused with the pantographs raised against the overhead contact line, the following conditions apply :

1) The following characteristics apply to the functional design of the system separation section :

2) if the track speed is higher than 250 km/h, the height of the overhead contact line in both systems must be the same.

Figure 4.2.22

Example of system separation section

4.2.22.3. Pantographs chained

This option is selected if the operating conditions of swolored pantographs cannot be met.

If a system separation section is perverted with lowered pantographs, it shall be designed in such a way as to avoid putting together the two systems with a pantograph raised by an error. Equipment must be provided that will allow both power supply systems to be disconnected if a pantograph is raised, for example by detecting short-circuits.

In the construction of system separation sections, a conformity assessment must be carried out within the energy subsystem.

4.2.23. Electrics for the coordination of electric protection

Constructions for the coordination of electrical protection in the energy subsystem must be in accordance with the requirements of EN 50388:2005, furtive. 11. The register of infrastructure shall include information on the system of protective equipment (see Annex D), so that the rolling stock subsystem can be declared interoperable.

A conformity assessment of the construction and operation of the distribution station must be carried out in accordance with EN 50388:2005 pkt. 14.6.

4.2.24. DC operational impact on AC systems

The fixed installations must be constructed in such a way that they are not damaged by low DC currents running out of the DC power supply system and into the AC power supply system. No damage due to DC stream-size of DC stream is still a pending point.

4.2.25. Harmonic and dynamic effects

Energy for high-speed lines must be able to cope with overvoltages caused by harmonic influences from rolling stock up to the limits of EN 50388:2005. 10:4. The conformity assessment must include a compatibility study indicating that the elements of the subsystem may withstand any harmonious impacts on the defined limits set out in EN 50388:2005, point. 10. A conformity assessment must be carried out in accordance with EN 50388:2005 pkt. 10.

4.3. Functional and technical specifications for the interfaces

The interface between the energy subsystem and the other subsystem are listed under each subsystem below as far as their technical compatibility is concerned. The interfaces are listed according to the following order of the subsystems : rolling stock, infrastructure, train control, and signals, Drift and traffic management.

4.3.1. System Rolling Stock

4.3.2. Height-speed infrastructure

4.3.3. Subsystem train control and signaler for high-speed lines

The interface for power management in phase and system separation sections is an interface between the energy subsystem and the rolling stock subsystem. However, it is implemented in practice through the train control and signalling subsystem, which is why the interface of the train TSI is specified for train control and signalling the TSI and rolling stock.

Since the harmonious current generated by the rolling stock affects the train control subsystem and signalling through the energy subsystem, this subject is dealt with in the subsystem train control and signalling (see the TSI for train control and signalling to the TSI) high speed service. 4.2.12.2 and Annex A index A6). The energy system requires no conformity assessment.

4.3.4. Speed operation traffic management and traffic management

The infrastructure manager shall establish systems for communication with the railway undertakings.

4.3.5. Safety in rail tunnels

The department division of the power supply in a tunnel shall be designed in accordance with the general strategy for the evacuation of the tunnel in question.

4.4. Operational rules

In the light of the essential requirements of Chapter 3, the following operating rules specific to the energy subsystem shall be considered in this TSI :

4.4.1. Isolating the power supply in case of danger

The infrastructure manager shall establish procedures for the appropriate management of the power supply in case of emergency. The railway companies which operate the line and those working on the line must be informed of the temporary measures, their geographical location, their species and the means of signalling. The responsibility for the work order must be defined in the emergency plan for the development of the infrastructure manager.

A conformity assessment must be carried out by verifying the existence of communication channels, instructions, procedures and devices for use in an emergency.

4.4.2. Construction of works works

In certain situations, which include prescheduled work, it may be necessary to temporarily suspend the specifications of the Energy subsystem and its interoperability constituents, as defined in Chapters 4 and 5 of the TSE. In this case, the Infrastructure Manager shall define the appropriate exemption measures required to ensure safety.

The following general provisions shall apply :

-WHAT? Exemption operating conditions which are not in accordance with the TSs must be temporary and scheduled.

-WHAT? The railway companies which operate the line and those working on the line must be informed of these temporary derogations, their geographical location, their species and the means of signalling.

The principles governing agreements between neighbouring infrastructure managers in cross-border sections are found in the TSI for high-speed OPE, furtive. 2.2.1.

4.4.3. Daily management of the power supply

The infrastructure manager may change the maximum permitted train flow according to the time and / or the power supply situation. The railway companies that use the line must be informed of these changes, their geographical location, their nature and the means for signalling (see Annex D).

4.5. Maintenance of the power supply and running power system

4.5.1. Responsibility of the producer

The manufacturer must deliver operational limits for all design parameters for the overhead contact line that can change during operation. For example, information on the permissible wear on the overhead contact line and allowed offset tolerance shall be provided.

4.5.2. Responsibility of the infrastructure manager

The infrastructure manager shall maintain the specific characteristics of the power supply system (including distribution stations and coupling points) and the overhead contact line throughout their life.

The infrastructure manager shall draw up a maintenance plan to ensure that the characteristics specified for the Energy subsystem are required to ensure interoperability, within the specified limits. In particular, the maintenance plan shall include a description of the staff ' s professional qualifications and of the personal protective equipment they must use.

The infrastructure manager shall design and implement methods for reporting information on security-critical defects and frequent system failure to the national security authority.

Maintenance procedures should not adversely affect safety regulations such as the continuity of return circuits, the reduction of overvoltage and the detection of short-circuits.

4.6. Fagable Qualifications

The professional qualifications necessary for the operation of the energy subsystem shall be reviewed in the TSI on operation and traffic management.

The maintenance requirements for maintenance of the energy subsystem shall be detailed in the maintenance plan (see furtive. 4.5.2).

4.7. Health and safety

4.7.1. Protective provisions for distribution stations and coupling stations

The electrical security of the power supply system must be achieved by constructing and testing these installations in accordance with EN 50122-1:1997, furtive. 8 (except EN 50179) and 9.1. Disposition stations and coupling stations shall be secured against unauthorized access.

The grounding stations and coupling stations must be integrated into the general grounding system along the line to meet the requirements for protection against electric shock as specified in EN 50122-1:1997, point. 8 (except EN 50179) and 9.1.

For each installation, it must be shown that the return circuits and the soil connections are sufficient through a design examination. It must be demonstrated that the measures for protection against electric shock and rail voltages are installed in accordance with the principle of construction.

A conformity assessment must be carried out in the assessment of the Energy subsystem.

4.7.2. Protective provisions for the overhead contact line

The electrical security of the overhead contact wire system and the protection against electric shock shall be carried out in accordance with EN 50119:2001 pkt. 5.1.2 and EN 50122-1:1997 pkt. 4.1, 4.2, 5.1 (except 5.1.2.5), 5.2 and 7.

The measures to control the overhead contact line system must be integrated into the overall set-aside system along the line. For the individual installations, it must be shown that the ground connections are adequate through a design examination. It must be demonstrated that the precaution of protection against electric shock and the rail voltage are installed in accordance with the principle of construction.

A conformity assessment must be carried out in the assessment of the Energy subsystem.

4.7.3. Safer rules for return circuits

The electrical security and functioning of the return cycle shall be achieved by constructing these installations in accordance with EN 50122-1:1997, in the case of the goods. 7, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6 (except EN 50179).

For each installation, it must be shown that the return circuits are sufficient through a design examination. It must be demonstrated that the precaution of protection against electric shock and the rail voltage are installed in accordance with the principle of construction.

A conformity assessment must be carried out in the assessment of the Energy subsystem.

4.7.4. Other general requirements

Other than the furtive. 4.7.1 to 4.7.3 and the requirements that are specified in the maintenance plan (see point. 4.5.2) Precautions shall be taken to ensure the health and safety of maintenance and operations personnel in accordance with EU regulations and national provisions which comply with EU law.

4.7.5. High Vision Clothing

The staff responsible for the maintenance of the energy subsystem shall wear reflexes when they are working or near the track. The concern shall be the CE mark (and therefore comply with the provisions of Directive 89 /686/EEC of 21. December 1989 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (s).

4.8. Infrastructure and rolling stock registers

4.8.1. Register of infrastructure

The information relating to the energy subsystem shall be included in Annex D of this TSI in the Infrastructure Register. In all cases where the whole subsystem energy or part of this is made interoperable, a point shall be introduced in the register of infrastructure as set out in Annex D and the relevant section of chapter 4 and 7.4 (special case).

4.8.2. Register of rolling stock

In Annex E of this TSI, the information relating to the energy subsystem shall be included in the register of rolling stock.

5. INTEROPERABILITY COMPONENTS

5.1. Definitions

According to Article 2 (d) of Directive 96 /48/EC, as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, interoperability constituents are : every part, group of parts, subassembly or complete unit of equipment part of or is intended to be part of a subsystem, which is directly or indirectly essential for the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system.

5.2. Innovative solutions

As mentioned in the section 4.1 of this TSI, innovative solutions may require new specifications and / or new methods of assessment. Such specifications and methods of assessment shall be developed in the process as described in section 6.1.2.3 (and 6.2.2.2).

5.3. List of interoperability constituents

Interoperability constituents have been considered in the relevant provisions of Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC and the components relating to the energy subsystem are described below.

The line of the line :

The interoperability component of the line will consist of the following components to be installed in the energy subsystem and the associated design and configuration rules.

The components of a queue release are a structure of wires strung up above the banking line to provide electricity to the electric train, as well as the associated beatings, isolators on the line and other devices including lodgers and coupling cables. It shall be placed above the upper limit of the structure gauge and supply electrical energy to trains through the rooftop pantograph equipment used to describe pantographs. For high-speed trains, overly overly contact lines are used with carrier ropes so that the contact wire / s are strapped between one or more the length of the carrier in the longitudinal plane.

Supporting components such as the overhead line, master and bedropments, return currents, feed-to-automatic transformers, contacts and other isolators are not part of the interoperability constituent component of the contact line. They are subject to the requirements of the subsystem with regard to interoperability.

5.4. Performance and Specifications of components

5.4.1. The line of meat

5.4.1.1. Total Project

The construction of the contact wire shall be in accordance with the intended construction of the contact line. 4.2.9.1

5.4.1.2. Geometry

The construction of the contact line shall be in accordance with the technical specifications in the case of the contact line. 4.2.9.2, 4.2.10 and 4.2.12.

5.4.1.3. Power Capacity

The power capacity must be in accordance with the requirements of Section 4.2.18.

5.4.1.4. Flesh Material

The cooling line materials must be in accordance with the line. 4.2.11.

5.4.1.5. Store on stay

For DC systems, the contact line must be designed in accordance with the requirements of the motion. 4.2.20.

5.4.1.6. Wavy propagation speed

The rate of wave propagation in contact wire must be in accordance with the requirements of 4.2.12.

5.4.1.7. Construction in relation to the distance between pantographs

The contact wire must be constructed with a distance between the pantograph as specified in point. 4.2.19.

5.4.1.8. Average Contact Force

The contact wire must be designed using the mean contact force Fm as specified in point. 4.2.15.

5.4.1.9. Dynamic behaviour and quality of the pantograph

The contact wire must be designed in accordance with the dynamic behaviour requirements. The requirements are in the furs. 4.2.16.

It must be demonstrated that the requirements are complied with in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 4.2.16.2.1.

5.4.1.10. Vertical offset of the point of contact

The contact point is the point where there is mechanical contact between a contact sheet and a meat release. The requirements are expressed in a furtive. 4.2.17.

5.4.1.11. Seed for a heel

The contact wire must be constructed with the required seat for the right to be raised as specified in a furtive. 4.2.16.

6. EVALUATION OF CONFORMITY AND / OR SUITABILITY FOR USE

6.1. Interoperability Components

6.1.1. Assessment procedures and modules

The assessment procedure for conformity of the interoperability constituents, as defined in Chapter 5 of this TSI, shall be carried out using modules as set out in Annex A to this TSI.

Where the adjudicating entity can show that tests or verifications of previous applications remain valid in the new uses, the notified body must take account of them in the conformity assessment.

The conformity assessment procedure of the overhead contact wires defined in Chapter 5 of this TSI is specified in Annex B, Table B. 1, to this TSI.

As required by the modules specified in Annex A to this TSI, the conformity assessment of an interoperability constituent shall be carried out by the notified body designated by the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community.

The manufacturer of an interoperability constituent or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up a Community declaration of conformity in accordance with Article 13 (1). 1, and Annex IV (3) of Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC before placing the interoperability constituent on the market of the interoperability constituent. No EC declaration of suitability for use is required for the interoperability constituents of the Energy subsystem.

6.1.2. Use of modules

6.1.2.1. General

The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community may select either the assessment procedure for an interoperability constituent in the energy subsystem.

-WHAT? the examination procedure (module B) set out in Annex A. 1 to this TSI for the design and development phase of combination with the type of conformity procedure (module C) set out in Annex A. 1 to this TSI for the production phase, or

-WHAT? the full quality assurance with the project review procedure (module H2) set out in Annex A. 1 to this TSI, for all phases.

These assessment procedures are defined in Annex A to this TSI.

Module H2 may only be chosen where the manufacturer uses a quality system for the design, production and inspection and testing of the final product approved and assessed by a notified body.

The conformity assessment shall cover all phases and characteristics as indicated by X in Table B. 1 of Annex B to this TSI.

6.1.2.2. Existing Solutions for Interoperability Components

If an existing solution for an interoperability constituent on the European market is already in place before the entry into force of this TSI, the following procedure shall be applied.

The manufacturer must demonstrate that tests and verification of the interoperability constituents have been suitable for previous applications under comparable conditions. In such cases, these assessments must remain valid for the new application.

In this case, the type of approval is a foregone conclusion and therefore a type-approval is not necessary.

In accordance with the assessment procedures for the different interoperability constituents, the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the European Union must use either :

-WHAT? the internal design control procedure with product verification (module A1),

-WHAT? or the full quality assurance procedure (module H1).

If it is not possible to demonstrate that the solution previously has been tried and approved, section 6.1.2.1.

6.1.2.3. Innovative solutions for interoperability constituents

When a solution proposed as an interoperability constituent is innovative as defined in Section 5.2, the manufacturer must make the discrepancy in relation to the relevant section of the TSI and apply for a compliance assessment or suitability of conformity, the application of the solution in question. The European Railway Agency will complete the required functional and interface specifications for the solution and prepare the methods of assessment.

The relevant functional and interface specifications and assessment methods must be incorporated into the TSI in relation to the audit process. As soon as these documents are published, the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the European Union may select the procedure for assessing the interoperability constituent as described in Section 6.1.2.1.

When a decision taken by the Commission in accordance with Article 21 (1). 2, of Directive 96 /48/EC, as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, has entered into force, the innovative solution may be used before it is incorporated into the TSIM.

6.2. Energy subsystem

6.2.1. Assessment procedures and modules

At the request of the adjudicating entity or his authorised representative established within the Community, the notified body must carry out the EC verification in accordance with Article 18 (1). 1, and Annex VI of Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, and in accordance with the provisions of the relevant modules listed in Annex A to this TSI.

Where the adjudicating entity can show that tests or verifications of previous applications remain valid in the new uses, the notified body must take account of them in the conformity assessment.

The assessment procedures for the EC verification of the energy subsystem are set out in Annex C, Table C. 1, to this TSI.

As specified in this TSI, the EC verification of the Energy subsystem must be taken into account its interfaces for other sub-systems of the trans-European high-speed rail system.

The adjudicating entity shall draw up the EC declaration of verification for the energy subsystem in accordance with Article 18 (1). 1, and Annex V to Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC.

6.2.2. Use of modules

6.2.2.1. General

In the context of the verification procedure of the energy subsystem, the adjudicating entity or its authorised representative established within the Community may choose between :

-WHAT? the unit verification procedure (module SG) indicated in Annex A. 2 to this TSI, or

-WHAT? the full quality assurance with the design examination procedure (module SH2) specified in Annex A. 2 to this TSI.

The SHO2 module may be selected only if all activities that contribute to the subsystem project to be verified (design, manufacturing, installation) are subject to a design, manufacture, inspection and inspection quality system ; the testing of the end product which has been approved and monitored by a notified body.

The assessment shall include the phases and specifications as specified in Table C. 1 of Annex C to this TSI.

6.2.2.2. Innovative solutions

When the Energy subsystem comprises a innovative solution as defined in Section 4.1, the adjudicating entity must lead the deviation in relation to the relevant section of the TSI and request a conformity assessment.

The European Railway Agency shall complete the relevant functional and interface specifications of this solution and design the evaluation methods.

The relevant functional and interface specifications and assessment methods must be incorporated into the TSI in relation to the audit process. As soon as these documents are published, the manufacturer or the adjudicating entity or his authorized representative established within the European Union, as described in Section 6.2.2.1, may choose the procedure for the assessment of the subsystem.

When a decision taken by the Commission in accordance with Article 21 (1). 2, of Directive 96 /48/EC, as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, has entered into force, the innovative solution may be used before it is incorporated into the TSIM.

6.2.3. Maintenance Rating

Purline to Article 18 (2), The contracting entity shall set up a technical file covering the maintenance plan as amended by Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC.

The notified body must only check the completeness of the maintenance plan.

The conformity assessment of the maintenance shall be borne by each of the Member States concerned.

6.3. The validity of certificates issued on the basis of the earlier published version of the TSI

The conformity certificates already issued on the basis of the previously published version of this TSI shall remain valid in the following cases :

-WHAT? issued at any time for the interoperability constituents produced or in the manufacture, but not yet integrated into a subsystem,

-WHAT? issued in the design phase of interoperability constituents which have not yet been produced ;

-WHAT? issued at any time for subsystems that have been taken in use

-WHAT? issued in the design phase of subsystems that have not yet been taken in use ;

6.4. Interoperability constituents without EC verification

6.4.1. General

For a limited period of time, known as the 'transitional period', interoperability constituents without EC verification of conformity or suitability for use may, in exceptional circumstances, be incorporated in subsystems subject to the condition that the provisions of this Directive ; section is met.

6.4.2. Transition Period

The transition period begins when this TSI enters into force and lasts for at least six years.

When the transitional period is completed and with the derogations provided for in section 6.4.3.3 below, the interoperability constituents must be covered by the required EC conformity and / or aptitude declaration before they are embedded in the subsystem.

6.4.3. Certification of subsystems that contain non-certified Interoperability constituents during the transition period

6.4.3.1. Terms and Conditions

During the transitional period, a notified body may issue a certificate of conformity for a subsystem, even though some of the interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem are not covered by the relevant EC declaration of conformity, and / or aptitude declaration in accordance with this TSI, if the following three criteria have been met :

-WHAT? the conformity of the subsystem is checked in relation to the requirements defined in Chapter 4 of this TSI by the notified body, and

-WHAT? if the notified body through supplementary evaluations confirms that conformity and / or suitability for interoperability constituent is in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 5, and

-WHAT? interoperability constituents which are not covered by the relevant EC conformity and / or aptitude declaration must be used in a subsystem already in use in at least one Member State before the entry into force of this TSI.

The EC conformity and / or suitability declarations shall not be drawn up for the interoperability constituents being assessed in this way.

6.4.3.2. Notification

-WHAT? The certificate of conformity for the subsystem must clearly indicate which interoperability constituents are assessed by the notified body in the framework of the subsystem verification.

-WHAT? The EC declaration of verification of the subsystem shall be clearly stated :

-WHAT? the interoperability constituents which are assessed as part of the subsystem,

-WHAT? a confirmation that the subsystem contains interoperability constituents identical to those that have been verified as part of the subsystem.

-WHAT? for these interoperability constituents, the reasons for the fact that the manufacturer has not submitted a EC conformity and / or declaration of suitability before it is incorporated into the subsystem.

6.4.3.3. Execution in the life of the subsystem

The production or upgrading of the subsystem in question shall be carried out within six years of the transitional period. In the life cycle of the subsystem :

-WHAT? during the transitional period and

-WHAT? during the period of responsibility of the body which issued the declaration on the EC verification of the subsystem,

interoperability constituents for which no EC conformity and / or -aptitude declaration has not been issued and which are of the same type and produced by the same manufacturer must be used for maintenance-related replacement and for spare parts ; the subsystem.

After the end of the transition period, and

-WHAT? until the subsystem is upgraded, renewed or replaced ; and

-WHAT? during the period of responsibility of the body which issued the declaration on the EC verification of the subsystem,

interoperability constituents for which no EC conformity and / or -aptitude declaration has not been issued and which are of the same type and produced by the same producer shall continue to be used for maintenance-related replacement.

6.4.4. Result Follow-Up System

During the transitional period, Member States shall monitor :

-WHAT? the number and type of interoperability constituents placed on the market in their own country ;

-WHAT? ensure that when a subsystem is submitted for approval, the reasons for which the manufacturer has not been certified by the manufacturer must register the reasons for the conformity of the manufacturer ;

-WHAT? notify the Commission and the other Member States of the non-certified IQ and the reasons for failure to certify.

7. COMPLETION OF POWER SUPPLY

7.1. Use of this TSI on new high-speed lines being used in use

Chapters 4 to 6 and any specific provisions in point. 7.4 below shall apply to the full extent of the lines located within the geographical scope of this TSI (see, cf. Act. 1.2) and which are to be used in accordance with the entry into force of this TSI.

7.2. Use of this TSI on high-speed lines which are already in operation

7.2.1. Introduction

For infrastructure installations already in operation, this TSI shall apply to sections of lines upgraded or renewed in accordance with the provisions of Article 14 (1). 3, in Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC. In this specific context, it is basically a transitional strategy that provides for the possibility of an economically responsible adaptation of the existing electricity supply facilities.

This TSI may be used directly for new installations, but implementation on other lines may require more or less extensive changes to existing installations. The necessary changes depend on the extent of conformity in the existing installation. The following principles apply to the TSI for the energy TSI, subject to the pretents of furtive. 7.4 (special case). When Member States require a new commissioning, the drainting must define the practical measures and phases required to meet the required performance requirements ; these phases include transition periods for which implementation can occur reduced performance.

This TSI does not apply to existing Power supply subsystem (s) on the high-speed network if they are not to be renewed or upgraded.

7.2.2. Classification of equipment works

With regard to the life expectancy of the different parts of the energy subsystem, a list of these parts shall be listed in descending order according to the degree of difficulty in the process of introducing the changes.

-WHAT? Parameters and specifications for the entire subsystem

-WHAT? Parameters for the mechanical parts of the overhead contact line

-WHAT? Parameters for the power supply

-WHAT? Parameters for the overhead contact line

-WHAT? Parameters related to other measures, operation and maintenance

Table 7.2 contains the parameters and the categories they are contained in.

7.2.3. Parameters and specifications for the entire subsystem

The elements relating to the whole system are subject to most restrictions, as they can and must be changed when a complete restructure of the entire subsystem is done on the line (gen-electrification). Point 4.2.10 is also linked to changes in the structure gauge for the line (structures, tunnels, etc.).

7.2.4. Parameters relating to the mechanical components of the contact wire and power supply

These parameters are less critical in partial changes, either because the regions with limited geographical scope can gradually change them, or because some parts can be changed independently of the subsystem that they constitute a part of.

They will be brought into line in the course of major projects for the construction of the catenary system, which will improve the performance of the line.

It is impossible to gradually replace all or part of the mechanical overhead contact elements with elements that are in conformity with the TSI. In such cases, account shall be taken of the fact that each of these elements is not a guarantee that the whole picture is in conformity : a subsystem or interoperability constituent conformity can only be observed globally, that is to say. once all items have been brought into conformity with the TSI.

Intermediate stages may, in this case, prove necessary in order to maintain the compatibility of the contact wire with other parts of the subsystem (train control and signalling, infrastructure), as well as the use of trains that are not covered by the TSI.

7.2.5. Drifilament Parameters

A compliance is required every time a new contact thread is installed in the overhead contact line.

7.2.6. Parameters related to other measures, operation and maintenance

These parameters must be met for the individual upgrades and renovations.

7.2.7. Scope of application

Each time an X in columns 3 or 4 is specified, the corresponding requirement shall also be used in the use of the furtive. 7.2.3 (the entire subsystem, column 2).

Where an X in column 5 is written, the corresponding requirement shall also be used in the use of the furtive. 7.2.3 (the entire subsystem (column 2)) or 7.2.4 (mechanical parts of the overhead contact line (column 3) or power supply (column 4)).

NB : In either case, there is no requirement for any alteration to the physical components if it can be demonstrated that the TSI is complied with.

Table 7.2.7

Use of the TSI for upgrading / renewal of existing lines

7.3. TSIs

In accordance with Article 6 (2), Directive 3, in Directive 96 /48/EC as amended by Directive 2004 /50/EC, the Agency shall be responsible for preparing the review and updating of the TSIs and to submit all relevant recommendations to the Committee referred to in Article 21 for consideration to be taken into account ; the technical progress or development of the requirements of the social requirements ; in addition, the ongoing adoption and revision of other TSIs may also affect this TSI. The proposed changes to this TSI need to be carefully reviewed, and updated the TSIs will be published every three years (indicative interval).

The Agency shall be informed of any innovative solutions which are considered by manufacturers or contracting entities under sections 6.1.2.3 or 6.2.2.2, or by the notified bodies, where the manufacturer or the contracting entity has failed to decide ; whether or not it will be included in the TSIM.

In such cases, the Agency shall act in accordance with Section 6.1.2.3 or 6.2.2.2.

7.4. Specific case

The following special provisions shall apply in exceptional cases. These special cases are classified according to two categories : the rules apply either permanently ("P" cases) or temporary ("T" cases). In relation to the intermediate period, or temporary, it is recommended that the target system be achieved either by 2010 ("T1 ") ; , a goal set by the European Parliament and Council Decision No 2. 1692 /96/EC of 23. July 1996 on the Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, or by 2020 ("T2 ").

7.4.1. Special features for the Austrian network

(P-case)

Category II and III lines

The investment in the replacement of contact lines of Category II and III lines and at stations to comply with the requirements of 1600 mm Euro pantographs is prohibitive ; trains that permeate these lines shall be panned with secondary pantograph ; of the 1950 mm for intermediate speed up to 230 km/h, so that the contact lines of these parts of the trans-European network do not need to be equipped with the Euro-pantograph. In these areas, a maximum lateral displacement of the contact wire of 550 mm measured vertically from the track centre line under the influence of the side winds. Future studies on upgraded lines and connecting lines shall take account of the Euro pantograph to show the relevant decisions of the decisions taken.

Category III lines (T1 case)

Additional distribution stations are required to comply with the average voltage requirements at pantograph and installed power. The installation is scheduled for 2010.

7.4.2. Special features for the Belgian network

(T1 case)

Existing Category I Straits

On existing category I, sections of phase separation are not compatible with the requirement that the distance between three pantographs after each other must be more than 143 m. Between existing Category I lines and category 2 lines, there is no automatic control to enable the main circuit breaker on the traction units.

Both will be changed.

Category II and III lines

During bridges on certain line sections, the contact wire height does not comply with the minimum requirements of the TSI. This has to change. No date has been set.

7.4.3. Special features for the German network

(P-case)

The investment in the replacement contact lines of Category II and III lines and at stations to comply with the requirements of 1600 mm Euro pantographs is prohibitive ; trains that permeate these lines shall be provided with secondary pantograph collectors ; 1950 mm for intermediate speed up to 230 km/h, so that the contact lines of these parts of the trans-European network do not need to be equipped with the Euro-pantograph. On these lines, a maximum lateral offset of the contact wire of 550 mm is permitted in relation to the vertical plane target from the track centre line under the influence of the side wind. Future studies on Category II and III lines must take account of the euro pantograph to show the relevant decisions of the decisions taken ;

7.4.4. Special features for the Spanish network

(P-case)

In some category II and III lines and stations, the 1600 mm Euro pantograph shall not be permitted. The trains running on these lines shall be equipped with secondary 1950 mm pantographs up to 230 miles per hour in a secondary.

The investment in the replacement of contact lines of Category II and III lines and at stations to comply with the requirements of 1600 mm Euro pantographs is prohibitive ; trains that permeate these lines shall be panned with secondary pantograph ; of the 1950 mm for intermediate speed up to 230 km/h, so that the contact lines of these parts of the trans-European network do not need to be equipped with the Euro-pantograph. On these lines, a maximum lateral displacement of the contact wire of 550 mm in relation to the vertical plane of the track from the track centre line under the influence of the side wind. Future studies on Category II and III lines must take account of the euro pantograph to show the relevant decisions in the decisions taken.

The nominal height of the contact line will be 5.60 m in a number of sections of future category I stretches in Spain, especially for the forthcoming high-speed line between Barcelona and Perpignan. This will also cover France between the Spanish border and Perpignan, if it is required of both governments.

On existing high-speed lines, sections of phase segregation are not compatible with the interoperable pantograph system for rolling stock (see the rolling stock TSI). 4.2.8.3.6.2). On these existing categories in-stretches, there is a great need to invest in changing the existing separation sections. In the case of incompatibility between interoperable rolling stock in the form of a train and a separation section, the Infrastructure Manager will propose special operating conditions. Existing non-interoperable separation sections will be upgraded by extensive changes.

7.4.5. Partiest features on the French network

(P-case)

Category I straits

On existing high-speed lines, sections of phase segregation are not compatible with the interoperable pantograph system for rolling stock (see the rolling stock TSI). 4.2.8.3.6.2). On these existing categories in-stretches, there is a great need to invest in changing the existing separation sections. In the case of incompatibility between interoperable rolling stock in the form of a train and a separation section, the Infrastructure Manager will propose special operating conditions. Existing non-interoperable separation sections will be upgraded by extensive changes.

Category I straps (T2 cases)

In a single high-speed line from Paris to Lyon, it is necessary to modify the overhead contact line so that the permitted avenging can be obtained without installing retaliation on the pantographs. Therefore, without assertion, trains do not have permission to drive on this route.

Categories II and III lines (T2 cases)

The cross-line profile of overhead contact lines for DC lines is not sufficient to comply with the requirements of the current TSI for the stay at stations or in areas where they are held.

On the existing high-speed line Paris-Tours, a 1.5 kV DC section (about 20 kilometres) is used at approximately 260 miles per hour. The modification of this section is not yet scheduled.

A DC pantograph head is used in 1950 mm on the existing DC line from Bordeaux to Spain (Irun). The contact lines must be upgraded so that this section can be operated with interoperable Euro pantograph heads of 1600 mm.

7.4.6. Special features for the British network

The railway infrastructure in Britain was premedically placed with a smaller structure gauge than the other railways in Europe. It is uneconomical or impossible to increase the structure gauge, which is why the target for UK UK1 is issue 2 (see the infrastructure for high-speed lines).

(P-case)

Height of the line of contact

A variable overhead contact line and gradient shall be kept on electrified lines in Category II and III. The nominal overhead contact line, which will be used in future on upgraded lines in Britain, will not be less than 4700 mm. However, when it is necessary for the purposes of the environment, the minimum height of 4140 mm allowed shall be sufficient for the passage of trains built in accordance with the UK1b profile.

The line of contact at the Continental Main Line (the interface between Network Rail, Channel Tunnel Rail Link and Eurotunnel) varies between 5935 mm and 5870 mm.

Page displacement of the overhead contact line.

In the existing category II and III sections, the permissible side displacement of the contact line in relation to the track centre line under the influence of lateral winds 400 mm in an altitude of the < 4700 mm is considered. For wheelhouse over 4700 mm, this value shall be reduced by 0,040 × (mm)-4700 mm for wire-height above 4700 mm.

Maximum contact force on discreet locations

In Category II and III lines, the discreet functions shall be designed to withstand a maximum contact force (Fmax) of up to 300 N filtered at 20 Hz.

Sections for phase separation

The line of cooling equipment shall be designed for the use of pantograph heads with a width of up to a maximum of 400 mm.

Pantograph profile

In the field of electrified lines in Category II and III, the electrification infrastructure (except for the contact wire and the header) are not within the structure gauge defined in the diagram (see Annex F) ; this is an absolute profile and not one reference profile that can be customized.

Voltage and frequency

For the purposes of this TSI and references to EN 50163:2004 and EN 50388:2005, abnormal operating conditions shall include a lack of access to a given combination of two or more power supplies.

Maximum train flow

The maximum train power for electrified lines in Category II and III in the United Kingdom must be 300 A unless a higher value is specified in the infrastructure register of a particular route.

7.4.7. Partial features on the Eurotunnel network

(P-case)

The overhead contact line on the Eurotunnel infrastructure in the Channel Tunnel varies between 6020 mm and 5920 mm.

7.4.8. Partiguest features on the Italian network

Existing Category I Straits (T1 case)

The geometry of overhead contact lines shall be adjusted in the height of a two-track DC route of 100 kilometres.

These changes will be implemented to 2010.

Existing Category I lines (P-case)

On the existing AC high-speed line between Rome and Naples, sections of phase segregation are not compatible with the interoperable pantograph system for rolling stock (see the rolling stock TSI). 4.2.8.3.6.2). This route calls for a high level of investment in order to change the existing separation sections. In the case of incompatibility between interoperable rolling stock in the form of a train and a separation section, the Infrastructure Manager will propose special operating conditions. Existing non-interoperable separation sections will be upgraded by extensive changes.

Categories II and III DC lines (T1 case)

The geometry of overhead contact lines shall be adjusted in the light of the height of the contact wire on parts of the lines involved.

Additional distribution stations are required to comply with the average voltage requirements at pantograph and installed power.

These changes will be implemented to 2010.

7.4.9. Partial features on the Irish and Northern Ireland networks

(P-case)

On electrified lines in Ireland and Northern Ireland, the nominal contact wire height of the standard lasse-gauge IRL1 and the required free-room shall be defined as the nominal contact wire height.

7.4.10. Special features on the Swedish network

(P-case)

The highest non-persistent voltage (Umax2) for rolling stock is 17500 V instead of 18000 V. The necessary investments to modify category II and III lines and stations to meet the requirements of 1600 mm ; The Europantograph is prohibitive. Track passing on these lines shall be fitted with secondary pantographs of 1800 mm for intermediate speed up to 230 km/h so that the contact lines of these parts of the trans-European network do not need to be equipped with The Euro pantograph. In the case of driving over the Øresund bridge to Sweden, 1950 mm pantographs are permitted. On lines taken by trains with such pantographs, a maximum lateral offset of the contact wire of 500 mm under the influence of the lateral wind shall be permitted. Future studies relating to Category II and III lines must take account of the euro pantograph to show the relevant decisions in the decisions taken.

A capacittative power factor is not permitted by voltages of 16.5 kV in Sweden because of the risk of making it difficult or impossible for others to take the regenerative braking due to a too high voltage in the overhead contact line.

In the case of regenerative braking (electric braking), the train must not act as a capacitor of more than 60 kVAr at any regenerated effect, i.e. the capacittal power factor shall be prohibited by regenerative braking. The exception of a 60 kVAr capacittative power factor is due to the fact that you wish to have the option of inserting filters on the high voltage side of the toget/traction unit. These filters shall not exceed 60 kVAr in the capacacitive power factor at the base rate.

7.4.11. Special features for the Finnish network

(P-case)

The normal height of the contact wire is 6150 mm (minimum 5600 mm at a maximum of 6500 mm).

7.4.12. Special features for the Polish network

(P-case)

Category II and III lines shall not be adapted to the 1600 mm Euro pantograph. Track passing on these lines shall be equipped with 1950 mm pantographs with contact pieces of 1100 mm length (see EN 50367:2006, Appendix B, figure B. 8 and B. 3).

In Category II and III lines, the permissible side displacement of the contact line in relation to the track centre line under the influence of the lateral wind shall be 500 mm in the height of the < 5600 mm.

The maximum train power for electrified lines in Category II and III shall be :

Category II-3200 A

Categories III-2500 A

unless other values are defined in the infrastructure register of a particular route.

7.4.13. Partial features on the Danish network, including the Øresund link to Sweden.

(P-case)

Category II and III lines

The investment to replace the contact lines of Category II and III lines and connecting lines and at stations to comply with the requirements of 1600 mm Euro pantographs is prohibitive ; trains running on these lines shall be devolted ; with secondary pantographs of 1800 or 1950 mm for intermediate speed up to 230 km/h, the contact lines of these parts of the trans-European network do not need to be equipped with the Euro-pantograph. For lines that are run by trains with such pantographs, a maximum lateral offset of the contact wire of 500 mm below the vertebrae shall be allowed to be disallowed.

Future studies on Category II and III lines and connecting lines shall take account of the euro pantograph to show the relevant decisions taken in the decisions taken.

On some AC line sections with bridges and stations, the maximum height of the overhead contact line is 4910 mm.

7.4.14. Partial features on the Norwegian network-For information

(P-case)

The investment in the replacement of contact lines of Category II and III lines and at stations to comply with the requirements of 1600 mm Euro pantographs is prohibitive ; trains that permeate these lines shall be panned with secondary pantograph ; at 1800 mm for intermediate speed up to 230 km/h, so that the contact lines of these parts of the trans-European network do not need to be equipped with the Euro-pantograph. For lines which are run by trains by 1800 mm pantographs, a maximum lateral offset of the contact wire of 550 mm during the vertebrae shall be allowed to be disallowed. Future studies on Category II and III lines must take account of the euro pantograph to show the relevant decisions in the decisions taken.

A capacittative power factor is not allowed by voltages of 16,5 kV in Norway because of the risk of making it difficult or impossible for other trains to slow regenerative braking due to too high voltage in the contact wire.

In the case of regenerative braking (electric braking), the train must not act as a capacitor of more than 60 kVAr at any regenerated effect, i.e. the capacittal power factor shall be prohibited by regenerative braking. The exception of a 60 kVAr capacittative power factor is due to the fact that you wish to have the option of inserting filters on the high voltage side of the toget/traction unit. These filters shall not exceed 60 kVAr in the capacacitive power factor at the base rate.

7.4.15. Special features for the Swiss network-For information

(P-case)

The investment in the replacement of contact lines of Category II and III lines and at stations to comply with the requirements of 1600 mm Euro pantographs is prohibitive ; trains that permeate these lines shall be panned with secondary pantograph ; at 1450 mm for intermediate speed up to 200 km/h, the tunnel profile and the contact lines of these parts of the trans-European networks do not need to be equipped with the Euro pantograph. Future studies relating to Category II and III lines must take account of the euro pantograph to show the relevant decisions in the decisions taken.

7.4.16. Partistic features on the Lithuanian network

The minimum contact wire height for open lines and stations are 5750 mm, and by rail crossings open to road traffic, the 6000 mm. In exceptional cases, with tracks not intended for rolling stock, and on open lines, the smallest conduit may be reduced to 5675 mm.

The maximum overhead contact height shall be 6800 mm in all cases.

In order to provide the possibility for future changes to the track profile of stations, the nominal contact wire height of open lines shall be 6500 mm and 6600 mm in stations.

7.4.17. Partiest features on the Dutch network

(P-case)

In the existing Category II and III lines, 1,5 kV of DC driving lines shall be used with one or more 1950 mm pantographs.

Amendments to Category II and III lines and stations in order to apply a 1600 mm pantograph head is uneconomic and impractical.

New categories II and III lines with a 1,5 kV DC queue release forming part of the high-speed network will be designed so that they are compatible with 1600 mm and 1950 mm pantograph heads.

7.4.18. Partial features on the Slovak network

Category II and III lines shall not be adapted to the 1600 mm Euro pantograph. Trains passing through these lines shall be equipped with 1950 mm pantographs.

7.5. Agreements

7.5.1. Existing Appointments

Within 6 months of the entry into force of this TSI, Member States shall inform the Commission of the following agreements, in accordance with the use of subsystems that fall within the scope of this TSI (construction, renewal, reorientation, the entry into service, operation and maintenance of the subsystem as defined in Chapter 2 of this TSI :

-WHAT? either national, bilateral or multilateral agreements between Member States and infrastructure managers or railway undertakings which have either been concluded for a limited period or at a certain period of time, and which are necessary because it referred to it ; traffic connection has a very specific or local character ;

-WHAT? bilateral or multilateral agreements between infrastructure managers, railway undertakings or safety authorities which lead to a high level of local or regional interoperability,

-WHAT? international agreements between one or more Member States and at least one third country or between infrastructure managers or railway undertakings from Member States and at least one infrastructure manager or railway undertaking from a non-member country, to a high level of local or regional interoperability.

Ongoing operations / maintenance of the sub-system within the framework of this TSI, which is covered by these agreements, shall be permitted to the extent that they comply with EU law.

The compatibility of these agreements with EU law, including their non-discriminatory nature, and in particular with this TSI, will take the necessary measures such as a review of the TSE so that it can include : any special cases or transitional arrangements.

7.5.2. Upcoming Appointments

Any future agreement or amendment of existing agreements shall be taken into account in the interests of Community law and, in particular, of this TSI. Member States must inform the Commission of such agreements / amendments. The procedure laid down in section 7.5.1 shall also apply here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ANNEX A

Concordance Modules

A. 1. List of modules

Modules for interoperability constituents

-WHAT? Module A1 : Internal design control with product verification

-WHAT? Module B : Component type-approval

-WHAT? Module C : Type mismatch

-WHAT? Module H1 : Qualified quality assurance system

-WHAT? Module H2 : Complete quality assurance with design examination

Modules for subsystems

-WHAT? Module SG : Entity Verification

-WHAT? Module SH2 : Full quality assurance with design examination

A. 2. Modules for interoperability constituents

Module A1 : Internal design control with product verification

1. In this module, the procedure described by the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community who implements the obligations laid down in point 2 shall ensure and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned meets the requirements of it ; The TSI that applies to it.

2. The manufacturer must provide the technical documentation, as described in point 3.

3. The technical documentation must enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of this TSI to be assessed.

The technical documentation must also demonstrate that the design of the interoperability constituent, which has already been approved prior to the implementation of this TSI, is in accordance with the TSE, and that the interoperability constituent has been operating within the framework of the operation of the TSI ; the same scope.

It must, to the extent that it is relevant for this assessment, cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent. To the extent that it is relevant for the assessment, the dossier shall include :

-WHAT? a general description of the interoperability constituent and the conditions for use of this ;

-WHAT? design drawings and manufacturing information, such as component parts and diagrams, modules, circuits, etc.

-WHAT? descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent ;

-WHAT? technical specifications, including European specifications ; 1) with the relevant provisions, in whole or in part,

-WHAT? descriptions of the solutions used to meet the requirements of the TSI where the European specifications have not been applied in full ;

-WHAT? results of design calculations, examinations carried out and so on.

-WHAT? Test reports.

4. The manufacturer must take all necessary measures to ensure that the manufacturing process ensures that the interoperability constituent is consistent with the technical documentation referred to in paragraph 3, and the requirements of the TSI in question.

5. The notified body chosen by the manufacturer must carry out all relevant studies and tests to verify that the interoperability constituents are in accordance with the type described in the technical procedure ; the documentation referred to in paragraph 3 and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. Manufacturer 2) can select one of the following procedures :

5.1. Verification by examination and testing of each product

5.1.1. All products must be individually examined and appropriate tests must be carried out in order to verify the conformity of the product with the technical documentation and requirements of the applicable TSI. When no tests are given in the TSI (or in a European standard quoted in the TSE), the relevant European specifications or equivalent test shall be applied.

5.1.2. It is the responsibility of the notified body to draw up a written certificate of conformity for the approved products in connection with the tests carried out.

5.2. Statistical control

5.2.1. The manufacturer must present its products in the form of uniform lots and take all necessary measures to ensure that the manufacturing process guarantees that all of the parties produced will be uniform.

5.2.2. All interoperability constituents must be available for verifying in the form of homogeneous batches. A random sample must be taken from each lot. All interoperability constituents in a test must be examined individually and appropriate tests must be carried out with a view to ensuring that they comply with the requirements of the technical documentation and the TSI in question and, to determine whether the batch is to be accepted or rejected. When no tests are given in the TSI (or in a European standard quoted in the TSE), the relevant European specifications or equivalent test shall be applied.

5.2.3. The statistical procedure shall include appropriate elements (statistical method, sampling plan, etc.), depending on the specifications to be assessed as specified in the TSI;.

5.2.4. When batches are accepted, the notified body must draw up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests carried out. All interoperability constituents in the lot may be placed on the market, except for the interoperability constituents of the sample which failed to comply with the conformity requirements.

5.2.5. Where a party is rejected, the notified body or the competent authority must take appropriate measures to prevent the placing on the market of that party. The notified body must, in the event of frequent rejection of lots, set the statistical verification.

6. The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration shall include at least the information listed in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13 (3). 3, in Directive 2001 /16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.

The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following elements :

-WHAT? references to Directives (Directive 2001 /16/EC and other Directives to which the interoperability constituent must be covered) ;

-WHAT? the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community (type of company name and full address and, in the case of a representative, shall also indicate the company name of the manufacturer or the constructor) ;

-WHAT? description of the interoperability constituent (label, type, etc.),

-WHAT? description of the procedure (module), which is used for the declaration of conformity,

-WHAT? all relevant descriptions fulfilled by the interoperability constituent and, in particular, the conditions of use of this,

-WHAT? the name and address of the notified body (ies) involved in the procedure for the declaration of conformity and dates, and the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates ;

-WHAT? the reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and, where appropriate, reference to the European specifications,

-WHAT? identification of the signatory of the powers to conclude obligations on behalf of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community.

The certificate to be referred to shall be the certificate of conformity referred to in point 5. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must ensure that it is possible to submit the notified body ' s certificates of conformity upon request.

7. The manufacturer or his authorised representative must keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity with the technical documentation for 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is established in the Community, the obligation to store the technical documentation material shall be borne by the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.

8. If, in addition to the EC declaration of conformity, a Community declaration of suitability for use is required for the interoperability constituent, this declaration must be added after having been issued by the manufacturer in accordance with the conditions, in module V.

Module B : Component type-approval

1. This module describes the part of the procedure whereby a notified body imps and confirms that a type representative of the production envisaged complies with the provisions of the TSI that apply to it.

2. Application for type-approval shall be submitted by the producer or his authorised representative established within the Community.

The request shall include :

-WHAT? the name and address of the manufacturer and, where the application is lodged by his representative, his name and address,

-WHAT? a written declaration that this application has not been lodged with any other notified body.

-WHAT? the technical documentation, as described in point 3.

The applicant shall make a sample representative of the production envisaged and hereinafter referred to as ' type `, at the disposal of the notified body.

A type may include several designs of the interoperability constituent, provided that the differences between the designs do not affect the provisions of the TSI;. The notified body may request further tests to carry out the test programme.

Where the examination procedure is not requested for type tests and the type is sufficiently defined by the technical documentation as described in point 3, the notified body may allow it to be given no sample at its disposal.

3. The technical documentation must enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of the TSE to be assessed. To the extent that it is relevant for this assessment, it shall cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent.

The technical documentation must include :

-WHAT? a general type description,

-WHAT? theoretical design and manufacturing documentation, such as drawings, components, subassemblies, circuits, etc.

-WHAT? descriptions and explanations necessary to understand the construction and manufacturing and manufacturing documentation, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent,

-WHAT? the integration conditions of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (subassembly, assembly, subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions ;

-WHAT? conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions on driving time or distance, slime boundaries, etc.) ;

-WHAT? the technical specifications, including European specifications ; 3) with relevant provisions applicable in whole or in part,

-WHAT? descriptions of the solutions approved in order to meet the requirements of the TSE, where the European specifications have not been applied to their full extent ;

-WHAT? results of design calculations carried out, examinations carried out and so on.

-WHAT? Test reports.

4. The notified body must :

4.1. examining the technical documentation

4.2. verify that the test results (s) for test purposes have been manufactured in accordance with the technical documentation and perform or perform type tests in accordance with the provisions of the TSI and the relevant European specifications if, in the case of : The TSI must be provided for a design examination :

4.3. Contest the design methods, tools and results to evaluate their capability to meet the conformity requirements for the interoperability constituent at the end of the design process, if : there shall be a design examination in the TSI,

4.4. If an evaluation of the manufacturing process is carried out, examine the manufacturing process developed for the preparation of the interoperability constituent with a view to evaluating its cooperation ; product conformity and / or check the checks carried out by the producer at the end of the design process ;

4.5. Identify the elements designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TSI and the European specifications, as well as the elements designed without the relevant provisions of these European specifications ; has been applied

4.6. perform, or have performed, appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 as part of determining whether the relevant European specifications have actually been applied when the manufacturer has chosen to use them ;

4.7. perform, or have performed, appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 to determine whether the solutions used by the manufacturer meet the TSI requirements in cases where the relevant European specifications have not been used

4.8. Agreement with the applicant where the examinations and the necessary tests must be carried out.

5. The notified body must issue a declaration of verification to the applicant when the type meets the provisions of the TSI;. The certificate must contain the name and address of the manufacturer, the results of the examination, the conditions for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type.

The period of validity shall not exceed 5 years.

A summary of the relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be annebated to the certificate and a copy shall be retained by the notified body.

If the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community is denied a declaration of verification, the notified body must provide a detailed justification for the rejection.

A procedure shall be established.

6. The applicant must inform the notified body which stores the technical documentation for the declaration of verification, of any change that may affect compliance with the TSI's requirements or the prescribed conditions of use of the subsystem. In such cases, the interoperability constituent must be approved separately by the notified body which has issued the EC type-approval certificate. In such cases, the notified body must carry out the examinations and tests that are appropriate and necessary due to the changes. This additional approval may be granted either in the form of an addition to the original declaration of verification or of a new declaration issued after the withdrawal of the old declaration.

7. If no changes have been made, cf. in paragraph 6, the validity of the declaration shall be extended for another period of validity. The applicant may apply for such an extension by means of a written confirmation that such amendments have not been made, and the notified body issues an extension with another period of validity as in point 5, if there is no available ; information on the contrary. This procedure can be repeated.

8. Each notified body must inform the other notified bodies of the issued, withdrawn or rejected verification declarations and additions.

9. The other notified bodies may, upon request, send copies of the declaration of verification issued and / or the addition of those notified to them. The Annexes to the declarations (see paragraph 7). 5) shall be made available to the other notified bodies.

10. The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community must keep together with the technical documentation copies of verification declarations and addendum to these for 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured. Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is established in the Community, the person who markets the interoperability constituent in the Community has the responsibility of keeping the technical documentation available.

Module C : Type mismatch

1. This module describes the part of the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned is in accordance with the type described in : the type-examination certificate and meets the requirements of the applicable TSI.

2. The manufacturer must take all necessary measures in order to ensure that the manufacturing process ensures that the interoperability constituent is consistent with the type as described in the EC type-examination certificate and the requirements of the TSI in question.

3. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up a EC declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent.

This declaration shall contain at least the information specified in Annex IV (3) and (3) and (3) and (3). 3, in Directive 2001 /16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.

The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following elements :

-WHAT? references to Directives (Directive 2001 /16/EC and other Directives to which the interoperability constituent must be covered) ;

-WHAT? the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community (type of company name and full address and, in the case of a representative, shall also indicate the company name of the manufacturer or the constructor) ;

-WHAT? description of the interoperability constituent (label, type, etc.),

-WHAT? description of the procedure (module), which is used for the declaration of conformity,

-WHAT? all relevant descriptions fulfilled by the interoperability constituent and, in particular, the conditions of use of this,

-WHAT? the name and address of the notified body (ies) involved in the procedure used in accordance with the type-examination and the date on the EC type-examination certificate (and additions thereto), together with the period of validity and provisions applicable ; the certificates,

-WHAT? the reference to this TSI and all other relevant TSIs and where appropriate reference to the European specifications, 4)

-WHAT? identification of the signatory of the powers to conclude obligations on behalf of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community.

4. The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is established in the Community, the obligation to store the technical documentation material shall be borne by the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.

5. If, in addition to the EC declaration of conformity, a Community declaration of suitability for use is required for the interoperability constituent, this declaration must be added after having been issued by the manufacturer in accordance with the conditions, in module V.

Module H1 : Qualified quality management system

1. In this module, the procedure described by the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community who satisfies the obligations laid down in paragraph 2 shall ensure and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned meets the requirements of it ; The TSI that applies to it.

2. The manufacturer must operate an approved quality assurance system for the design, production and inspection of the final product and for testing as specified in point 3, and subject to surveillance as specified in point 4.

3. Quality management system

3.1. The manufacturer must submit an application for assessment of the quality assurance system to a notified body of his choice for the interoperability constituents concerned.

The application shall include :

-WHAT? all relevant information concerning the representative product category for the envisaged interoperability constituent ;

-WHAT? the documentation concerning the quality system,

-WHAT? a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body.

3.2. The quality assurance system shall ensure that the interoperability constituent is in accordance with the requirements of the TSI in question. All the elements, requirements and provisions approved by the manufacturer must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of strategies, procedures and instructions in written form. The documentation for this quality system must ensure a common understanding of quality policies and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and registers.

In particular, the documentation must contain an adequate description of :

-WHAT? the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

-WHAT? the responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to the design and product quality,

-WHAT? technical design specifications, including European specifications ; 5) which will apply and where the European specifications cannot be fully applied, the methods that will be used to ensure that the requirements of the TSI applied to the interoperability constituent will be complied with ;

-WHAT? the techniques, processes and systematic actions for design verification and design controls that will be used when designing interoperability constituents and related to the product category in question ;

-WHAT? the corresponding production, quality control and quality management techniques, processes and systematic measures which will be taken into operation ;

-WHAT? examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after the manufacturing, and the frequency with which they will be carried out ;

-WHAT? the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification information of the personnel concerned, and so on.

-WHAT? the methods for monitoring the achievement of the required design and product quality, and the actual use of the quality assurance system.

The quality policies and procedures shall include in particular the various assessment phases such as the design audit, the revision of the manufacturing process and type-examination that these are specified in the TSIM, for the different interoperability constituent components ; properties and functions.

3.3. The notified body must assess the quality assurance system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of section 3.2. These requirements are deemed to have been met if the manufacturer uses a quality system for the construction, production, inspection of the finished product and testing according to standard EN/ISO 9001-2000, taking into account the characteristics of the specific characteristics of : the interoperability constituent used for.

Where the manufacturer uses an approved quality assurance system, the notified body must take account of this in the assessment ;

The check visit must be specific to the product category that is representative of the interoperability constituent. The assessment team shall include at least one member with experience in assessing the product technology concerned. The assessment process shall include a visit to the manufacturer ' s premises.

The manufacturer must be notified of the The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and a justification for the assessment decision.

3.4. The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil its obligations under the quality assurance system as approved and to maintain it in such a way as to keep it appropriate and effective.

The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community must keep the notified body that has approved the quality assurance system informed of any planned updating of the quality assurance system.

The notified body must assess the proposed changes and decide whether the modified quality system will continue to comply with the requirements referred to in 3.2 or whether a new assessment is needed.

The manufacturer must be notified of the The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and a justification for the assessment decision.

4. Monitoring of the quality assurance system under the responsibility of the notified body

4.1. The purpose of surveillance is to ensure that the manufacturer complies with the obligations arising out of the approved quality assurance system, correct.

4.2. The manufacturer must allow the notified body access to the premises used for the design, manufacture, inspection and testing premises, and shall provide the necessary information to the body, in particular :

-WHAT? the documentation concerning the quality assurance system,

-WHAT? the quality documents which they must be presented in accordance with the design part of the quality assurance system, such as analysis results, calcium, testing, etc. ;

-WHAT? the quality records to be provided according to the design part of the quality assurance system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification information for the personnel concerned, and so on.

4.3. The notified body must carry out audits on a regular basis to ensure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality assurance system and shall make an audit report available to the manufacturer. Where the manufacturer uses an approved quality assurance system, the notified body must take account of this in the assessment.

The inspections must be carried out at least once a year.

4.4. In addition, the notified body may pay unannounced visits to the manufacturer. At the time of such visits, the notified body may carry out tests or have it carried out in order to verify the proper functioning of the quality assurance system. It must make a visit report available to the manufacturer and a test report, if any tests have been carried out.

It shall be the responsibility of the manufacturer for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, to store and make the following available to the national authorities :

-WHAT? the documentation referred to in the second indent of the second paragraph of point 3.1,

-WHAT? the update referred to in section 3.4, second subparagraph,

-WHAT? the decisions and reports from the notified body that are listed in the last paragraph of point 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4.

6. Each notified body must inform the other notified bodies of the issuer, withdrawn or rejected approvals of quality assurance systems.

The other notified bodies may ask for copies of the approval and supplementary authorisations of quality assurance systems to be sent copies of the approval of the relevant product.

7. the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration shall include at least the information listed in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13 (3). 3, in Directive 2001 /16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents shall be dated and signed.

The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following elements :

-WHAT? references to Directives (Directive 2001 /16/EC and other Directives to which the interoperability constituent must be covered) ;

-WHAT? the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community (type of company name and full address and, in the case of a representative, shall also indicate the company name of the manufacturer or the constructor) ;

-WHAT? description of the interoperability constituent (label, type, etc.),

-WHAT? description of the procedure (module), which is used for the declaration of conformity,

-WHAT? all relevant descriptions fulfilled by the interoperability constituent and, in particular, the conditions of use of this,

-WHAT? the name and address of the notified body (ies) involved in the procedure applied in respect of conformity and date of certificates, together with the period of validity and arrangements for the certificates ;

-WHAT? the reference to this TSI and all other relevant TSIs and where appropriate reference to the European specifications,

-WHAT? identification of the signatory of the powers to conclude obligations on behalf of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community.

The following certificate must be made :

-WHAT? the approval of the quality assurance system as specified in point 3.

The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of ten years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is established in the Community, the obligation to store the technical documentation material shall be borne by the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.

9. If, in addition to the EC declaration of conformity, a Community declaration of suitability for use is required for the interoperability constituent, this declaration must be added after having been issued by the manufacturer in accordance with the conditions, in module V.

Module H2 : Complete quality assurance with design examination

1. This module describes the procedure whereby a notified body carries out an examination of the design of an interoperability constituent and by which the producer or his authorised representative established within the Community that fulfils the obligations laid down in point (1). 2, ensure and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned meets the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

2. The manufacturer must operate an approved quality system for the design, manufacture, final production control and testing as described in point 3 and shall be subject to the checks referred to in Section 4.

3. Quality assurance systems

3.1. The manufacturer must submit an application for the assessment of his quality assurance system to the notified body in question, for the purpose of the interoperability constituent concerned.

The request shall include :

-WHAT? all information that is relevant to the product category representative of the interoperability constituent envisaged,

-WHAT? documentation of the quality assurance system,

-WHAT? a written declaration that this application has not been lodged with any other notified body.

3.2. The quality assurance system shall ensure that the interoperability constituent is in accordance with the requirements of the TSI in question. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of strategies, procedures and instructions in written form. This quality assurance documentation must ensure a common understanding of quality assurance policies and procedures such as quality assurance programmes, plans, manuals and registers.

In particular, the documentation must contain an adequate description of :

-WHAT? the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

-WHAT? responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to the design and product quality,

-WHAT? the technical design specifications, including European specifications ; 6) that will be used and where the European specifications will not be used to the full extent, which will then be used to ensure compliance with the requirements of the TSI that apply to the interoperability constituent,

-WHAT? methods, processes and systematic actions for verification and verification of the design that will be used in connection with the design of the interoperability constituents relating to the product category,

-WHAT? the related techniques, processes and systematic actions used in the manufacture, quality control and quality assurance ;

-WHAT? the examinations, control measures and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the frequency they will be carried out with ;

-WHAT? quality assurance documentation, such as inspection reports, test data, calibration data and qualification reports of the personnel concerned, and so on.

-WHAT? the means used to monitor the achievement of the required design and product quality, as well as the effective operation of the quality assurance system.

The quality strategies and procedures must in particular cover the rating phases, as well as the design examination, evaluation of the manufacturing process and type-examination, as specified in the TSI for interoperability constituent, different specifications and performance.

3.3. The notified body must assess the quality assurance system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in 3.2. The notified body must assume that the requirements are met if the producer introduces a quality assurance system for the design, manufacture, control and testing of the end product, resulting from the standard EN/ISO 9001:2000, and in which account is taken of them ; special characteristics of the interoperability constituent to which the quality assurance system is to be used.

Where the manufacturer uses a certified quality assurance system, the notified body must take account of this in its assessment.

The check must be specific to the product category, which is representative of the interoperability constituent. The assessment team shall include at least one member with experience in assessing the product technology concerned. The evaluation procedure must also include an on-site visit to the production site.

The manufacturer must be notified of the The communication shall contain the conclusions of the control and a reason for the decision on this matter.

3.4. The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil its obligations under the quality system as approved and to maintain it in such a way as to keep it appropriate and effective.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must inform the notified body that has approved the quality assurance system, of any intended updating of the quality assurance system.

The notified body must assess the proposed changes and determine whether the modified quality assurance system will still be able to meet the requirements of section 3.2 or whether a review is required.

The manufacturer must be notified of the The communication shall contain the conclusions of the assessment and a justification for the decision on this matter.

4. The supervision of the quality assurance system under the responsibility of the notified body

4.1. The purpose of supervision is to ensure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality assurance system.

4.2. The manufacturer must allow the notified body access to the design, manufacturing, inspection and testing facilities and storerooms for inspection purposes and provide all necessary information, including :

-WHAT? the related documentation of the quality assurance system,

-WHAT? the quality documents which they must be presented in accordance with the design part of the quality assurance system, such as analysis results, calcium, tests, etc. ;

-WHAT? the quality records concerning the manufacturing part of the quality assurance system, such as approval certificates and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, and so on.

4.3. It is the responsibility of the notified body to carry out regular checks to ensure that the producer maintains and applies the quality assurance system, and to draw up a control report to the manufacturer. Where the manufacturer uses a certified quality assurance system, the notified body must take account of this in its assessment. The check shall be carried out at least once a year.

4.4. In addition, the notified body must make unannounced visits to the producer. During such visits, the notified body may carry out tests, if necessary, carry out tests in order to verify the functioning of the quality assurance system as intended. It issues a visitation report and, where appropriate, a test report to the manufacturer.

It shall be the responsibility of the manufacturer for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, to store and make the following available to the national authorities :

-WHAT? the documentation referred to in points 3.1, second indent, second indent,

-WHAT? the update referred to in the second subparagraph of point 3.4,

-WHAT? the decisions and reports from the notified body referred to in the last paragraph of point 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4.

6. Construction Survey

6.1. The producer shall submit an application for design examination of the interoperability constituent to a notified body of his choice.

6.2. The application must be understood to be comprehensible to the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent and provide the ability to assess compliance with the TSIs.

It shall include :

-WHAT? a general type description,

-WHAT? the technical design specifications, including European specifications, with relevant provisions applicable in whole or in part ;

-WHAT? any necessary supporting evidence to be reimbursed, in particular where the European specifications of related provisions have not been applied ;

-WHAT? the test programme,

-WHAT? the integration conditions of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (subassembly, assembly, subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions ;

-WHAT? conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions on driving time or distance, slime boundaries, etc.) ;

-WHAT? a written declaration that this application has not been lodged with any other notified body.

6.3. The applicant shall provide the results of the tests ; 7) , including type-examination, if required by his or her own suitable laboratory or on its behalf.

6.4. The notified body must examine the application and assess the results of the tests. Where the design meets the provisions of the TSI concerned, the notified body must issue a Community design examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate must include the conclusions of the examination, the conditions of validity, the necessary data for identification of the approved design and a description of the product ' s function, where appropriate. The period of validity shall not exceed 5 years.

6.5. The applicant must inform the notified body which has issued the EC declaration of verification, of any amendments to the approved design that may affect compliance with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use, the interoperability constituent. In such cases, the interoperability constituent must be approved separately by the notified body which has issued the EC type-approval certificate. In such cases, the notified body must carry out the examinations and tests that are appropriate and necessary due to the changes. This additional approval shall be given in the form of an addition to the original certificate.

6.6. If no changes have been made, cf. in point 6.4, the validity of the declaration shall be extended for another period of validity. The applicant may apply for such an extension by means of a written confirmation that such amendments have not been made, and the authorised body issues a prolongation with another period of validity as in point 6.3, if there is no available ; information on the contrary. This procedure can be repeated.

7. Each notified body must inform the other notified bodies of the approval of quality assurance systems and the EC design examination certificates issued by it, withdrawn or rejected.

The other notified bodies may, on request, be sent copies of :

-WHAT? authorizations issued for quality assurance systems and additional approvals and

-WHAT? EC design examination certificates and additions issued.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration of conformity of the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration shall include at least the information provided for in Directive 96 /48/EC, Annex IV, point 3, and Article 13 (1). 3. The EC declaration of conformity and the documents accompanying it must be dated and signed.

The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following elements :

-WHAT? the Directive references (Directive 96 /48/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may be subject),

-WHAT? the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the Community (where the company name and full address is given is given by a representative, specifying the company name of the manufacturer or the constructor) ;

-WHAT? description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc.),

-WHAT? an indication of the procedure (module) followed for the declaration of conformity ;

-WHAT? all relevant descriptions for the interoperability constituent, in particular any conditions of use,

-WHAT? the name and address of the notified body (s) involved in the procedure followed in accordance with the procedure and the date on certificates and certificates together with each of their validity and conditions ;

-WHAT? reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSIs and, where appropriate, to European specifications,

-WHAT? the identity of the signatory to which the producer or his authorised representative established within the Community must be committed.

The certificates referred to are :

-WHAT? the approval of the quality assurance system and the monitoring reports referred to in points 3 and 4,

-WHAT? The EC design examination certificate and the add-ons to do so.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured. Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is established in the Community, the person who markets the interoperability constituent in the Community has the responsibility of keeping the technical documentation available.

If, in addition to the EC declaration of conformity, the TSI also requires a Community declaration of suitability for use, this declaration shall be added after it is issued by the manufacturer in accordance with the conditions of module V.

A. 3. Modules for subsystems

Module SG : Entity Verification

1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies, at the request of the adjudicating entity or his authorized representative established within the Community, that a subsystem of the energy supply is :

-WHAT? in accordance with this TSI and to other applicable TSI, which show that the essential requirements ; 8) has been fulfilled in Directive 96 /48/EC ;

-WHAT? are in accordance with other rules arising from the Treaty and may be used.

2. The adjudicating entity 9) shall submit an application for EC verification (for unit verification) of the subsystem to a notified body of its choice.

The request shall include :

-WHAT? name and address of the adjudicating entity or its representative ;

-WHAT? technical documentation,

3. The technical documentation must enable the design, manufacture, installation and operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity of the TSI requirements to be assessed.

The technical documentation must include :

-WHAT? a general description of the subsystem and its general structure and structure ;

-WHAT? the infrastructure register, including all indications as specified in the TSI.

-WHAT? theoretical design and manufacturing documentation, such as drawings, components, subassemblies, devices, circuits, etc.

-WHAT? descriptions and explanations necessary to understand the design and manufacturing documentation, maintenance and operation of the subsystem,

-WHAT? the technical specifications, including European specifications, 10) that have been used

-WHAT? any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the abovementioned specifications, in particular where the European specifications of the relevant provisions have not been applied in full,

-WHAT? a list of interoperability constituents to be integrated into the subsystem,

-WHAT? copies of Community declarations of conformity or suitability for use, to which the said components must be accompanied, and all the elements required by the Directives of Directives ;

-WHAT? evidence of compliance with the other Treaty rules (including certificates and certificates),

-WHAT? the technical documentation concerning the production and assembly of the subsystem,

-WHAT? a list of producers involved in constructing, manufacture, mounting and installing the subsystem,

-WHAT? conditions for the use of the subsystem (restrictions on driving time or distance, slime boundaries, etc) ;

-WHAT? the maintenance and technical documentation requirements for the maintenance of the subsystem,

-WHAT? any technical requirements to be taken into account in connection with the production, maintenance or operation of the subsystem,

-WHAT? results of design calculations carried out, examinations carried out and so on.

-WHAT? any other relevant technical documentation which can prove that there are no prior checks or tests carried out by means of a good result under comparable conditions by unwilling and competent bodies.

If the TSI requires additional information for the technical documentation, these must be attached.

4. The notified body must examine the application and the technical documentation and identify the elements designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TSI and the European specifications, as well as those which are the elements which are constructed without the application of the relevant provisions of these European specifications.

The notified body must examine the subsystem and make (or contribute to) appropriate and necessary tests to establish whether or not the relevant European specifications, when declared to be selected, have actually actually been used, or whether the selected solutions meet the TSI requirements if the relevant European specifications have not been applied.

These examinations, testing and control measures must also include the following phases as specified in the TSIM :

-WHAT? the overall design,

-WHAT? the construction or preparation of the subsystem, in particular, and where appropriate, the construction of construction, the installation of the components and the alignment of the whole ;

-WHAT? final testing of the subsystem,

-WHAT? and, where it is specified in the TSI, the validation under total operating conditions.

The notified body may take account of evidence of investigations, testing or tests carried out with a positive result, in comparable circumstances by other agencies ; 11) or by (or on behalf of) the applicant when this is specified in the applicable TSI. The notified body shall then decide whether the results of these checks or testing measures are to be taken into account.

The documentation collected by the notified body must be suitable and adequate to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the TSIM, as well as all required and appropriate checks and tests carried out.

Any evidence derives from other parties shall be reviewed prior to the execution of the tests or checks, since the notified body may carry out an assessment, examination or examination of the tests or checks on it, time in which they are executed.

The extent of such documentation must be documented in particular by means of the following factors : 12) .

This justification must be included in the technical file.

In any case, the notified body must ultimately be responsible for this.

5. The notified body may, with the adjudicating entity, agree to the place where the tests are carried out and can agree that the test of the finished subsystem and, if required by the TSIM, the testing under normal operating conditions is carried out by the contracting entity, direct surveillance and presence of the notified body.

6. The notified body to carry out test and control must have access to the design premises, construction sites, manufacturing, installation, installation, and, if applicable, premises and testing facilities, to : perform its task as specified in the TSI;.

7. When the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSIM, the notified body must, in the light of these tests and verification and control measures, see it. The TSI and / or the relevant European specifications shall complete the certificate of conformity to the adjudicating entity, which shall then draw up the EC declaration of verification to the supervisory authority of the Member State in which the subsystem is established and / or in operation.

The EC declaration of verification and the documents accompanying it must be dated and signed. The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must include at least the information specified in Annex V to the Directive.

The notified body is responsible for the creation of a technical file to accompany the EC declaration of verification. The technical documentation must contain at least the information set out in Article 18 (1). 3, in the Directive and in particular :

-WHAT? all necessary documents concerning the subsystem ' s specifications ;

-WHAT? a list of the interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem,

-WHAT? copies of the EC declaration of conformity and, where appropriate, the EC declaration of suitability for use, which shall be issued for the said components in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive, together with, where appropriate, the corresponding documents ; (Certificates, quality assurance systems and surveillance reports) drawn up by the notified body (s)

-WHAT? all relevant information on maintenance, conditions and restrictions on the use of the subsystem,

-WHAT? all relevant information on instructions for maintenance, constant or periodevis monitoring, regulation and maintenance ;

-WHAT? the certificate of conformity of the notified body referred to in point 7, accompanied by verification and / or its calculations countersigned by the notified body, stating that the project complies with the Directive and the TSIM, indicating the conformity of the project, any reservations which have been taken during the execution of the work and are not withdrawn and shall be assisted by the visits and inspection reports drawn up by the body in the framework of the verification ;

-WHAT? evidence of compliance with the other Treaty rules (including certificates and certificates),

-WHAT? the infrastructure register, including all indications as specified in the TSI.

9. The documentation to be provided for the resolution of the resolution shall be kept in the contracting entity.

The Procuring Entity shall keep a copy of the technical dossier throughout the life cycle of the subsystem and shall be sent to all other Member States at their request.

Module SH2 : Full quality assurance with design examination

1. This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies, at the request of a contracting entity or his authorized representative established within the Community, that an intract subsystem,

-WHAT? in accordance with this TSI and to other applicable TSI, which show that the essential requirements ; 13) has been fulfilled in Directive 96 /48/EC ;

-WHAT? are in accordance with the other Treaty laws and may be used.

2. The notified body must carry out the procedure, including a design examination of the subsystem, on the condition that the adjudicating entity 14) and the principal contracts fulfil the obligations set out in paragraph 3.

' The captors ' shall refer to companies which, by means of their activities, contribute to meeting the essential requirements of the TSI, which are :

-WHAT? the company responsible for the whole subsystem project (including, in particular, the integration of the subsystem) ;

-WHAT? other companies that are included only in part of the subsystem project (for example, in the case of installation or installation of the subsystem).

It is therefore not a question of subcontractors of interoperability constituents and other components.

3. The adjudicating entity or the main contractor shall, for the part of the part, be the subject of the EC verification procedure, the design, manufacture, and testing of the end product, shall use an approved quality assurance system (see. point 5) which shall be subject to supervision (cf. point 6).

The main contractor responsible for the entire subsystem project (including, in particular, for the integration of the subsystem) must, in all events of the design, manufacture and inspection and testing of the end product, use an approved approval ; the quality assurance system to be subject to supervision, cf. Paragraph 6.

If the procuring entity itself is responsible for the entire subsystem project (including in particular for the integration of the subsystem) or the contracting entity is directly involved in the design and / or production (including installation and installation), the adjudicating entity must : the application of an approved quality assurance system for these activities to be subject to supervision as specified in section 6.

Applicants that are only involved in mounting and installation shall be limited to using an approved quality assurance system for the production and testing and testing of the end product.

4. EC verification procedure

4.1. The adjudicating entity shall submit an application for EC verification of the subsystem (through a fully qualified design system with a design examination), including the coordination of the supervision of the quality assurance systems as specified in paragraphs 5.4 and 6.6, to : a notified body of his choice. The adjudicating entity must inform the manufacturers concerned of his choice and of the application.

4.2. The application must be understood in an understandable manner through the design, manufacture, assembly, assembly, maintenance and operation of the subsystem and enable conformity of the TSI to compliance with the TSI requirements.

The request shall include :

-WHAT? name and address of the adjudicating entity or its representative ;

-WHAT? the technical documentation, including :

-WHAT? a general description of the subsystem and its general structure and structure ;

-WHAT? the technical specifications, including European specifications, 15) that has been used for the design of the design ;

-WHAT? any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the abovementioned specifications, in particular where the European specifications of the relevant provisions have not been applied in full,

-WHAT? the test programme,

-WHAT? the infrastructure register, including all indications as specified in the TSI.

-WHAT? the technical documentation concerning the production and assembly of the subsystem,

-WHAT? a list of interoperability constituents to be integrated into the subsystem,

-WHAT? copies of Community declarations of conformity or suitability for use, to which the said components must be accompanied, and all the elements required by Annex VI to the Directive ;

-WHAT? evidence of compliance with the other Treaty rules (including certificates and certificates),

-WHAT? a list of all manufacturers involved in constructing, manufacture, mounting and installing the subsystem,

-WHAT? conditions for the use of the subsystem (restrictions on driving time or distance, slime boundaries, etc) ;

-WHAT? the maintenance and technical documentation requirements for the maintenance of the subsystem,

-WHAT? any technical requirements to be taken into account in connection with the production, maintenance or operation of the subsystem,

-WHAT? the explanation of how all phases referred to in point 5.2 are covered by the quality assurance systems used by the main contractor (s), and / or the contracting entity, if this is involved and proof of their effectiveness ;

-WHAT? Indication of the notified body (s) responsible for the approval and supervision of such quality assurance systems.

4.3. The adjudicating entity shall submit the results of the examinations, checks and tests ; 16) , including type-examination, if required by the contracting entity's own suitable laboratory or on its behalf.

4.4. The notified body must examine the application for a design examination and assess the results of the tests. If the design meets the provisions of the Directive and the applicable TSI, the notified body must draw up a design examination report to the applicant. The report shall include the conclusions of the project entry, validity conditions, the necessary data for the identification of the design examined and, where appropriate, a description of the subsystem ' s function.

If the adjudicating entity does not obtain a design examination report, the notified body must give a detailed account of such a disserpation. A procedure shall be established.

4.5. The applicant must inform the notified body which shall keep the technical documentation for the declaration of verification, of any change that may affect compliance with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions of use of the subsystem ; in such cases, the subsystem shall be subject to a supplementary approval. In such cases, the notified body must carry out the examinations and tests that are appropriate and necessary due to the changes. This additional approval may be granted either in the form of an addition to the original declaration of verification or of a new declaration issued after the withdrawal of the old declaration.

5. Quality assurance system

5.1. The adjudicating entity and / or main contractor must submit an application for the assessment of their quality assurance systems to a notified body of his choice.

The request shall include :

-WHAT? all information that is relevant to the proposed subsystem,

-WHAT? the associated documentation of the quality assurance system.

If a contracting entity / main contractor is included only in part of the subsystem project, information on the relevant part shall be provided.

5.2. A contracting entity or main contractor responsible for the entire subsystem project shall have a quality assurance system that ensures that the entire subsystem complies with the requirements of the TSE.

The quality assurance system of other main bars must ensure compliance between their contribution to the subsystem and the requirements of the TSIM.

All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the applicant must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of strategies, procedures and instructions in written form. This quality assurance documentation must ensure a common understanding of quality assurance policies and procedures such as quality assurance programmes, plans, manuals and registers.

In particular, the system shall contain an adequate description of the following :

in the case of all applicants :

-WHAT? the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

-WHAT? the related techniques, processes and systematic actions used in the manufacture, quality control and quality assurance ;

-WHAT? examinations, inspections and tests to be carried out before, during and after design, manufacture, installation and installation, and the frequency of such tests ;

-WHAT? quality assurance documentation, such as inspection reports, test data, calibration data and qualification reports of the personnel concerned, and so on.

in the case of the main contractor, as appropriate for their contribution to the design of the subsystem :

-WHAT? the technical design specifications, including European specifications, which will be used and where the European specifications will not be used to the full extent, what resources will then be used to ensure the fulfillance of : the requirements of the TSI that apply to the subsystem,

-WHAT? control and techniques, processes, and systematic actions for the verification of the design that will be used for the design of the subsystem,

-WHAT? the means used to monitor the execution of the required design and product quality in the subsystem and the effective use of quality assurance systems at all phases, including production.

and, in addition, for the contracting entity or business contractor, if they are responsible for the whole subsystem project :

-WHAT? the responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to the overall quality of the subsystem, including integration management of the subsystem.

Surveys, tests and controls must cover all of the following stages :

-WHAT? the overall design,

-WHAT? structure of the subsystem, including in particular the construction of construction, the installation of the components, final adjustment,

-WHAT? final testing of the subsystem,

-WHAT? the validation under normal operating conditions when it is specified in the TSI.

5.3. The notified body which the Procuring Entity has chosen shall examine whether all phases of the subsystem as referred to in item 5.2 are adequate and properly covered by the approval and surveillance requirements of the applicant (s) ; 17) quality assurance system (s).

In particular, if the conformity of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI is based on more than one quality assurance system, the notified body must examine in particular :

-WHAT? on the links and interfaces between the quality assurance systems are clearly documented ;

-WHAT? and whether the overall responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to the conformity of the entire subsystem for the main contractor are sufficiently and properly defined.

5.4. The notified body referred to in point 5.1 shall assess the quality assurance system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of section 5.2. The notified body must assume that the requirements are met if the applicant introduces a quality assurance system for the design, manufacture and testing and testing of the end product according to standard EN/ISO 9001:2000, taking into account the requirements of the final product ; special features of the subsystem to which the quality assurance system is to be covered.

Where an applicant applies a certified quality assurance system, the notified body must take account of this in its assessment.

The inspection visit must be organised for the purpose of the subsystem in question and shall take particular account of the applicant ' s contribution to the subsystem. The assessment team shall include at least one member with experience in assessing the technology in question in the subsystem. The assessment procedure shall include an inspection visit to the applicant ' s activities.

The outcome of the assessment shall be notified to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the evaluation and a justification for the assessment decision.

5.5. The adjudicating entity, if involved, and the main contractor must ensure that the obligations arising from the quality assurance system as approved and to maintain a continuous and efficient operation of such operations.

They must keep the notified body that has approved the quality assurance system up to date of any significant change that will affect the compliance of the subsystem ' s compliance.

The notified body must assess the proposed changes and determine whether the modified quality assurance system will still be able to meet the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a reassessment is required.

The outcome of the assessment shall be notified to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the evaluation and a justification for the assessment decision.

6. Liability of quality assurance systems under the responsibility of the notified body

6.1. The purpose of supervision is to ensure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractor duly fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality assurance system or approved quality assurance systems.

6.2. The adjudicating entity and the main contractor shall send (or have sent) the notified body referred to in paragraph 5.1, all necessary documents for this purpose, and in particular the implementing plans and technical records relating to the subsystem (if applicable) : these are relevant to the applicant ' s particular contribution to the subsystem), including the quality assurance system documentation, including the special means used to ensure that :

-WHAT? and, furthermore, for the procuring entity or main contractor responsible for the entire subsystem project :

-WHAT? (for the main contractor) the overall responsibility and power of the management with regard to the conformity of the entire subsystem are sufficiently and properly defined ;

-WHAT? for the individual applicants :

-WHAT? and that the quality assurance system of each applicant is managed correctly in order to achieve integration at the subsystem level ;

In addition :

-WHAT? the quality documents which they must be presented in accordance with the design part of the quality assurance system, such as analysis results, calcium, tests, etc. ;

-WHAT? the quality of documents to be presented in accordance with the manufacturing part of the quality assurance system (including installation, installation and integration), such as visitation reports and test data, calibration data and the relevant staff, the qualification information, etc.,

6.3. The notified body must periodically carry out inspections to ensure that the adjudicating entity, if involved, and the main contractor maintains and applies the quality assurance system, and shall draw up a control report to them. Where the manufacturer uses a certified quality assurance system, the notified body must take account of this in its assessment.

At least one annual visit shall be made for at least one visit during a period in which the relevant activities (construction, manufacture, installation or installation) are carried out for the subsystem, which is subject to the EC verification procedure ; Paragraph 4.

6.4. The notified body may also pay unexpected visits to the applicant (s) of the applicant (s) as referred to in point 5.2. For such visits, the notified body may, if necessary, carry out partial or complete checks or carry out tests to verify the functioning of the quality assurance system as intended. The notified body must send the applicant (s) a visitation report and, if necessary, an inspection and / or test report.

6.5. The notified body which was chosen by the contracting entity and which is responsible for the EC verification must, if it does not supervise all the quality assurance systems in question referred to in point 5, shall coordinate the supervisory activities of any other person concerned ; notified body which is responsible for the task, for :

-WHAT? ensure that proper management of the interfaces between the different quality assurance systems in the field of integration of the subsystem has been carried out,

-WHAT? in cooperation with the Procuring Entity, in cooperation with the adjudicating entity, the elements necessary for the assessment in order to guarantee the coherence and overall supervision of the various quality assurance systems.

Such coordination shall include the right of the notified body to :

-WHAT? to receive all documentation (approval and supervision), drawn up by the other notified body (s),

-WHAT? to be supervisors indicated in paragraph 5.4,

-WHAT? to have additional inspection visits as specified in 5.5, as it is responsible for, in cooperation with the other notified bodies.

7. The notified body referred to in paragraph 5.1 shall have access to design facilities, facilities, production premises, assembly and installation areas, storage facilities, and, where appropriate, prefabrication, or, more generally, to all premises, which it considers necessary to be able to visit to perform its tasks, in accordance with the applicant ' s contribution to the subsystem project.

8. The adjudicating entity, if involved, and the main three-preners shall in a period of 10 years after the last subsystem has been produced to store the following elements so that they can be made available to the national authorities :

-WHAT? the documentation referred to in the second indent of the second paragraph of 5.1,

-WHAT? the updating referred to in point 5.5, second subparagraph,

-WHAT? the decisions and reports from the notified body referred to in paragraphs 5.4, 5.5 and 6.4.

9. When the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSE, the notified body must, on the basis of the design examination and approval of the quality assurance system (s), the certificate of conformity completed by the adjudicating entity, which is subsequently carried out ; provide the EC declaration of verification to the supervisory authority of the Member State in which the subsystem is established and / or in operation.

The EC declaration of verification and the documents accompanying it must be dated and signed. The declaration shall be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must include at least the information contained in Annex V to the Directive.

10. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity is responsible for assemfying the technical documentation to be attached to the EC declaration of verification. The technical documentation must contain at least the information set out in Article 18 (1). 3, in the Directive and in particular :

-WHAT? all necessary documents concerning the subsystem ' s specifications ;

-WHAT? a list of the interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem,

-WHAT? copies of the EC declaration of conformity and, where appropriate, the EC declaration of suitability for use, which shall be issued for the said components in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive, together with, where appropriate, the corresponding documents ; (Certificates, quality assurance systems and surveillance reports) drawn up by the notified body (s)

-WHAT? evidence of compliance with the other Treaty rules (including certificates and certificates),

-WHAT? all relevant information on maintenance, conditions and restrictions on the use of the subsystem,

-WHAT? all relevant information on instructions for maintenance, constant or periodevis monitoring, regulation and maintenance ;

-WHAT? the certificate of conformity of the notified body referred to in point 9 shall be assisted by the notified body and the signature of the notified body, stating that the project is in accordance with the Directive and the TSIM, and where appropriate, of the reservations which have been made during the execution of the activities and not withdrawn. The certificate must also be accompanied by any visit and inspection reports drawn up in connection with the approval referred to in points 6.4 and 6.5 ;

-WHAT? the infrastructure register, including all indications as specified in the TSI.

11. each notified body must inform the other notified bodies of the approval of quality assurance systems and the EC design examination certificates issued by it, withdrawn or rejected.

The other notified bodies may, on request, be sent copies of :

-WHAT? authorizations issued for quality assurance systems and additional approvals and

-WHAT? EC design examination certificates and additions issued.

12. The documentation for the resolution of the resolution must be kept in the contracting entity.

The Procuring Entity shall keep a copy of the technical dossier throughout the life cycle of the subsystem and shall be forwarded to the other Member States so that they so request.

A. 4. Assessment of the maintenance arrangements for the conformity assessment procedure

This item is outstanding.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX B

Conformist assessment of interoperability constituent components

B. 1. Scope of application

This Annex indicates the conformity assessment of the interoperability constituents (meat release, pantograph and contact points) of the Energy subsystem.

B. 2. Description

The characteristics of the subsystem to be assessed in the different phases of design, installation, installation and operation are marked with X in Table B. 1. The production phase must be assessed within the subsystem.

A queue release may never be used outside the energy subsystem.

Table B. 1.

Assessment of the interoperability constituent : the line of contact

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ANNEX C

Assessment of the Energy subsystem

C1. Scope of application

This Annex contains a summary of the conformity assessment for the Energy subsystem.

C.2. Properties and modules

The characteristics of the subsystem to be evaluated in the different phases of the design, installation, installation and operation are marked with X in Table C. 1.

Table C. 1

Assessment of the Energy subsystem

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX D

Infrastructure Register, Information on the Energy subsystem

D.1. Scope of application

This Annex contains information on the energy subsystem, which shall be entered in the Infrastructure Register for each of the homogenous sections of interoperable lines to be drawn up in accordance with the provisions of the provisions of this Annex. 4.8.

D.2. Properties to describe

Table D1 contains the interoperability properties of the energy subsystem, which must be reported for each line section.

Table D. 1

The following information shall be indicated in the register of the infrastructure register :

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ANNEX E

Register of rolling stock, required information for the energy subsystem

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX F

Specific example-Great Britain-Power Out Profile Envelop

Legend :

-WHAT? " H " shall mean 6240 mm Maximum

-WHAT? uplift

-WHAT? Euro pan

-WHAT? centers line of track to extreme position the city track tolerance

This chart shows the most remote profile within which the movements of the pantograph must take place. The template must be affixed to the outer position of the permitted centre lines of the tracks, taking into account sporting services that are not included. The profile is not a reference profile.

At all speeds up to the line speed, maximum altitude, maximum wind speed, where unhindered driving is possible and extreme wind speeds defined in the Infrastructure Register are :

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXHIBIT C TO K NOT USED

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ANNEX I

List of outstanding items

4.2.15. Average Contact Force

The values for Fm, C1 and C2 curves at speeds above 320 km/h.

4.2.20. Current Stay (DC-Systems)

Allowed temperatures are an outstanding point, which is expected to be solved in the next edition of EN 50119 (in the field of CENELEC) ;

4.2.24. DC operational impact on AC systems

The maximum DC current which AC systems must be able to handle ; this study is carried out by the CENELEC within the general framework for the reciprocal impact between AC systems and DC systems on parallel lines.

1) The announcement shall implement the Commission Decision 2008 /284/EC of 6. In March 2008, a technical specification for the interoperability of the energy subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system (EU-Official Journal of 2008). L 104, page 1-79).

1) OJ L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 6. Directive as amended by Directive 2007 /32/EC (OJ L 141, 2.6.2007, p. 63).

2) OJ L 245, 12.9.2002, p. 280.

1) This is, a pantograph that is certified as an interoperability constituent.

2) Ouch. A queue release that is certified as an interoperability constituent.

3) EN 50206-1:1998 will be amended later.

1) The definition of a European specification is given in Directive 96 /48/EC and 2001 /16/EC. The application manual for the high-speed TSI also explains how the European specifications should be used.

2) If necessary, the manufacturer ' s choice of choice may be limited to specific components. In this case, the relevant verification process to be followed for the interoperability constituent is indicated in the TSI (or in the annexes thereto).

3) The definition of a European specification is given in Directive 96 /48/EC and 2001 /16/EC. The application guide to the TSIs for the high-speed line explains how the European specifications should be used.

4) The definition of a European specification is given in Directive 96 /48/EC and 2001 /16/EC. The application manual for the high-speed TSI also explains how the European specifications should be used.

5) The definition of a European specification is given in Directive 96 /48/EC and 2001 /16/EC. The application manual for the high-speed TSI also explains how the European specifications should be used.

6) The definition of a European specification is given in Directive 96 /48/EC and 2001 /16/EC. The application guide to the TSIs for the high-speed line explains how the European specifications should be used.

7) The test results may be submitted at the same time as the application or at a later date.

8) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and benefits requirements, as shown in Chapter 4 of this TSI.

9) In this module, the "procuring entity" means the adjudicating entity as defined in the Directive or its authorised representative established within the Community '.

10) The definition of a European specification is given in Directive 96 /48/EC and 2001 /16/EC. The application guide to the TSIs for the high-speed line explains how the European specifications should be used.

11) The terms of the subcontracting and testing shall correspond to the terms and conditions which a notified body must comply with by subdelivery (see section 6.5 in the blue guide to the new method, Blue Guide to the New Approach).

12) The notified body must examine the various parts of the subsystem ' s function and before, during and after completion of the work, the following :-the risks and the security simplifications of the subsystem and its various parts, the use of existing equipment ; and systems used previously, but adapted to the new use of existing constructions, technologies, materials and production techniques. -arrangements for the design, production, testing and service obligation-operational and service obligation-previous approvals from other competent bodies-accreditations of other relevant bodies : -The notified body may take account of valid accreditation according to EN45004 if there is an interest in this to include the completed test and that the accreditation is up to date of no formal examination, accreditation, the notified body must confirm that the control of competence, independence, testing, and material handling processes, facilities and equipment and other processes of relevance to the subsystem, control-test all cases must be carried out ; the notified body must examine whether or not the schemes are measured and deduent ; a decision on the required certification level use of homogeneous parties and systems in accordance with Module F.

13) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and benefits requirements, as shown in Chapter 4 of this TSI.

14) In this module, the "procuring entity" means the adjudicating entity as defined in the Directive or its authorised representative established within the Community '.

15) The definition of a European specification is given in Directive 96 /48/EC and 2001 /16/EC. The application guide to the TSIs for the high-speed line explains how the European specifications should be used.

16) The test results may be submitted at the same time as the application or at a later date.

17) In particular, the notified body must participate in the final operational test of rolling stock or set of rolling stock, in the case of rolling stock TSI. It will be set forth in the relevant chapter of the TSI;.