Read the untranslated law here: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=126394
Overview (table of contents) Chapter 1 purpose and scope
Chapter 2 Organisation and planning
Chapter 3 access to try
Chapter 4 Test Forms
Chapter 5 Test organization
Chapter 6 Evaluators (examiner and Examiner)
Chapter 7 Rating
Chapter 8 Evidence
Chapter 9 errors and shortcomings of samples
Chapter 10 complaints about the tests
Chapter 11 appeals from decisions of an educational institution or an Appeals Board
Chapter 12 Other rules
Chapter 13-entry into force and transitional provisions The full text of the ordonnance on tests and exams in vocational education
1) § 4, paragraph 1, article 33, paragraph 2, and section 69 of the Act on vocational training, in accordance with article 3. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 1244 of 23. October 2007,
2) § 1, paragraph 2, and section 38 of the law on institutions of vocational training, in accordance with article 3. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 938 by 22. September 2008,
3) section 34, paragraph 2, and paragraph 4, of the law on pharmacies company, see. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 855 of 4. August 2008,
4) § 22 (1) (8). 3 and 4, and section 30 of Act No. 207 of 31. March 2008 on vocational college education and University bacheloruddannelser,
5) section 6 (1) and (3) and section 28 of the law on Establishments of higher education and other independent institutions of higher education, etc., see. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 228 of 17. March 2006,
6) section 15 of the law on approval of health professionals and health professional activity, see. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 1350 of 17. December 2008,
7) § 8 (1) (8). 4, section 12 and section 13, paragraph 2, of law No. 579 of 9. June 2006 about education for bachelor as a teacher in elementary school,
8) section 11, no. 4 – 6, and section 14, paragraph 1, of the lov nr. 315 of 19. April 2006 on education to bachelor as educators,
9) section 21 (2), section 30, paragraph 2, and section 32, no. 1 of the law on vocational education and higher education (further education system) for adults, see. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 1051 of 29. August 2007,
10) § 2, paragraph 9 – 12, and article 18, paragraph 2, of the Act on open education (vocational adult education), etc., see. lovbekendtgørelse nr. 939 of 22. September 2008, and
11) § 1 of lov nr. 247 of 6. April 2001 on the Organization of Danish tests and exams abroad shall be determined:
Purpose and scope
§ 1. In this Ordinance is education, which is organized according to the rules laid down in point 2. 1-2 of the preamble, as well as the chiropodist training, referred to as basic vocational training. Courses are organized according to the rules laid down in point 2. 3-10 of the preamble, aside from the chiropodist training, is referred to as higher education.
§ 2. The purpose of tests and exams, which are regulated in the Decree, is to document the extent to which the examinee meets the goals and requirements for the training and its elements.
(2). The notice regards tests and exams, as after the publication, the curriculum or the local curriculum for each training shall be demonstrated by test-or diploma.
(3). It follows from the notice, the curriculum or the local learning plan for the individual training, what tests and exams are included in the training, the extent to which test scores are weighted in their mutual relations, and what are the requirements for the issuance of the certificate of completion of training.
Organisation and planning
§ 3. The samples have to be organised in order to demonstrate the degree of achievement of the objective in relation to essential goals and requirements.
(2). Tasks to a sample provided by the educational institution, unless otherwise specified in the notice for the individual training. Educational institutions, providing the same training, can make tasks that are common to the institutions.
(3). When the tasks for a test made by the Ministry of education, the Ministry shall set the date and time of holding of the sample.
§ 4. It is the responsibility of the educational institution to make the exam takers must familiar with the goals and requirements that are essential for the samples.
(2). The educational institution shall establish within this framework and in accordance with the notice publication for the individual training detailed in the curriculum or the local curriculum of the following:
(a)) which tests and other assessments included in the training.
(b)) the number of specimens, including parts and extracts of prøvefag, and the weighting of the grades given in the individual samples, in accordance with article 3. § 2, paragraph 3.
c) Setting and any cancellation is made for samples, including sickness, see. §§ 5-9.
d) Sample forms, including whether the examinee can choose between several sample forms, see. § 11.
e) Fulfilment of the obligation of participation and delivery of tasks and projects, etc.., which is a prerequisite for participation in a trial.
2) An exam regulations on the holding of samples:
(a)) the use of assistive devices, see. § 15.
(b)) the language used by the sample, see. § 17.
(c) Special test conditions, see). § 18.
d) use of own and others ' works, see. § 19.
e) irregularities within the meaning of. section 16, paragraph 2 – 3, and sections 19 and 41.
f) Complaints, see. Cape. 10.
g) identification of examinees.
3) For higher education in the way:
a) How assessment of the testees ' formulation and spelling ability is part of the overall assessment of exam performance, see. section 37, paragraph 2.
(3). The educational institution may derogate from what it has itself laid down in the curriculum or the local learning plan, if it is justified by exceptional circumstances.
(4). It is the responsibility of the educational institution to notify examinees and the other cast members by tests on sample rules and whether, in accordance with paragraph 2. The rules must be available on the educational institution's home page.
Access to try
§ 5. Registering for a training element, term, etc. at the same time registration for its tests. The educational institution may, for each test set a time limit for when unsubscribing from the sample can take place. If a deadline for cancellation is not provided, cancellation may take place, until the test begins, see. § 16.
(2). In the absence of timely cancellation not, considered the test in terms of the number of sample tests have been started, see. § 6. However, this does not apply where the students will be unable to attend due to illness, see. § 7.
(3). The educational institution may derogate from the applicable time limit referred to in article 6. (1) when it is justified by exceptional circumstances.
§ 6. Successful tests may not be taken on. Included are several subsamples of a sample, subsamples, where there is no character cannot be passed if gained, when the overall test is passed, unless otherwise specified in the notice, the curriculum or the local curriculum for training
(2). Is a test not passed after the publication, the curriculum or the local learning plan for training, the examinee remains enrolled in the sample, see. However, paragraphs 3 and 4, and article 9.
(3). At basic vocational education, see. § 1 the examinee can participate in the same sample, 2 times. The educational institution may authorize participation in 1 try once more, if it is justified by exceptional circumstances. Tests covered by section 12, shall take a decision after consulting the educational institution with the Technical Committee.
(4). In higher education, see. § 1, the examinee participate 3 times in the same sample. The educational institution may authorize additional sample times, if it is justified by exceptional circumstances. Lack of suitability study is not unusual conditions.
(5). New trial to be held as soon as possible and as far as possible, at the latest, when the test in question again held by the educational institution, possibly as a sick sample, see. section 7, paragraph 1.
(6). An examinee receipt of an offer of catch-up session pursuant to section 41, paragraphs 2 to 4, article 47, paragraph 1, no. 2, or section 52 (1) (8). 2, are not considered to be use of a sample time.
§ 7. An examinee who has been prevented from carrying out a test due to proven disease or other unforeseeable reason, must be given the opportunity to take the test as soon as possible. It is a sample which is placed in training last exam termin, examinees have the opportunity to submit a sample in the same exam termin or in immediate extension. For the exam as a journeyman's test or part of a journeyman's test organised test after consultation with the Technical Committee.
(2). The sample consists of several parts, where the character is given for each part, presenting the examinee only try in the part or parts that are not completed, unless otherwise provided by the rules on the training. This is true even where the individual characters are counted together into one character for the aggregate sample.
(3). Other special circumstances where an examinee practical are prevented from meeting to try, may, in accordance with the educational institution's specific assessment are processed in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2.
§ 8. In the basic vocational education, see. § 1, shall report the student sample in a training element, when the student has followed the teaching of that item or have obtained credits therefor, unless otherwise provided by the Ordinance or the local learning plan for individual training. The educational institution determines whether or not the student has met the condition.
§ 9. Vocational college and University bacheloruddannelser should it or the tests the students after the notice or the curriculum must participate in before the end of the 1. year of study after study start be passed before the end of the student's 2. year of study after study start, in order that the student may continue training ...
(2). Other requirement passed the test as a prerequisite for continuing training shall be set out in the notice for the training.
(3). The educational institution may, in respect of each student may grant derogations from the times laid down in order to pass the test or tests referred to in paragraph 1, if it is warranted on the grounds of maternity or unusual conditions.
§ 10. Test methods should take account of the overall training purposes, and sample forms must also ensure that there can be an individual assessment of the examinees. Students can try for themselves and other assessment is organised separately.
(2). The samples are arranged as individual samples, unless otherwise provided by the Ministry of education.
§ 11. The educational institution determines the shape of the individual sample, see. section 4, paragraph 2, when other not stated in the notice for the individual training.
(2). In determining the sample form includes the following elements:
1) Sample basis:
a) Specimen (questions, task and similar), if the reply is the basis for the assessment.
b) Possible involvement of other material.
(c) the restriction of the use of) any assistive devices, see. § 15.
2) test sequence:
(a)) time frame.
(b) Any drawing lots, see.) (4).
c) any preparation, including duration and shape.
(d)) the way the implementation.
3) Responder Lifetime notify form:
(a)) in writing.
d) Combinations of (a) – (c).
(3). The sample can be electronically based, as far as the basis, pathway and answer or elements thereof.
(4). Tasks for samples with oral answer will be distributed by drawing lots among the examinees ', unless otherwise stated in the notice for the individual training. Each examinee must be able to choose between at least 4 options. At the draw to the examiner as well as either the censor or the institution's head or a person designated by the head being present, however, not by internal tests in higher education, see. section 30, paragraph 1.
§ 12. Samples by exam in vocational training may be wholly or partly represent or belong to a journeyman's test. In the notice of the individual training can it after the Technical Committee provision be provided that one or more samples in the final period in a school education can constitute a journeyman's test or be part of a journeyman's test.
(2). By the samples referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply:
1) Tasks provided by the educational institution in consultation with the Technical Committee, or by a task Committee set up by the Technical Committee.
2) Assessment shall be carried out by the testees ' teacher, which is the examiner, and usually 2 censors (stage mestre) appointed by the Technical Committee. These censors must have the necessary insight into the training and the field of study, sample relates, and must not have employment at the educational institution or the student's internship place or be the student's employer. By practical tests, the censors be present throughout the test, unless otherwise stated in the rules on the training.
3) the Technical Committee shall assume all the costs associated with the participation of the censors, as the Technical Committee has appointed, as well as spending by the Professional Committee drawing up terms of the proposal.
4) achieved grades included in the educational institution's basis for the issue of (school) certificate in accordance with the rules of education.
(3). The Technical Committee may be for use by the censors (film masters) produce an examiner's Guide and can lay down rules on reporting obligations herein to the Technical Committee regarding the actors ' tasks. The educational institution must have a copy of the examiner's manual for use by the examiner.
(4). The educational institution agreements with the Technical Committee, how the procedure, moreover, must be for the samples that make up a journeyman's test or is part of a journeyman's test.
(5). Complaints regarding the rating of the exam as a journeyman's test or as a part of a journeyman's test is determined by the educational institution in consultation with the Technical Committee.
(6). For the samples referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply the provisions of Chapter 6, 9, 10 and 11 do not.
§ 13. With the oral and practical examinations reply is without prejudice to public. However, paragraphs 2 and 3, unless they are subject to an agreement under section 55, paragraph 3.
(2). Clinical samples with patient participation is public only with the patient's permission.
(3). The educational institution may derogate from the provisions of paragraph 1, if there are special circumstances, including where the interests of the examinee grounds. Furthermore, the educational institution may restrict access to try the premises of space reasons.
(4). By an individual test, where the examinee are examined on the basis of a group-made product, the other members of the group must not be present in the Chamber, before they even have been examined.
(5). The educational institution may make audio or video recordings of an oral examination, if the footage is included as part of the test cycle. However, the examinee can make audio recording of his own oral test.
(6). Only the examiner and examiner must be present during their deliberations at the practical and oral tests, including oral defence of projects. The institution may, however, provide that future Examiners may attend an assessment.
§ 14. The educational institution shall ensure that the tests are carried out in conditions that are fit to rule out the possibility that the examinee communicates unintentionally.
(2). The educational institution must ensure that the examinee has adequate working conditions by the samples.
§ 15. During the tests is the use of assistive devices, including electronic, allowed, except in the notice, the curriculum or the local curriculum for each training is provided for restrictions on the use of the basic regulation. However, paragraph 2.
(2). The educational institution may provide for restriction of access to the use of electronic devices by capacity reasons.
§ 16. A trial has begun, when the distribution of the tasks are started when the preparatory material or task title is handed over to the examinee, or when the examinee has become familiar with the test question or similar.
(2). An examinee who is late for a written test, can only participate in the sample, if the educational institution considers it possible that the person may have received any information about the task, and finds that the delay is reasonably justified. The probationary period may be extended only in exceptional cases.
(3). An examinee who is late for an oral examination, can get the offer to be examined at a later stage, if the educational institution finds that the delay is reasonably justified.
§ 17. The samples are presented in Danish, see. However, paragraphs 2 and 3. The samples may be sat in Swedish or Norwegian instead of Danish, except where the purpose of the test is to provide evidence of the testees ' skills in Danish.
(2). Have the teaching of a subject been communicated in a foreign language, must undergo a test in that language. The educational institution may derogate from this rule.
(3). The educational institution may, incidentally, where conditions make it possible, allow an examinee who wish to carry out a test in a foreign language. However, this does not apply to samples, which requires the production of Danish.
§ 18. The educational institution offers special test conditions for examinees with physical or mental disability, for examinees with similar difficulties, as well as for examinees with a mother tongue other than Danish, when the institution considers that this is necessary to equate these examinees with others in the test situation. It is a prerequisite that the offer is no change of the test level.
§ 19. An examinee who obtains it during a test or gives another examinee improper help to reply to a task or using unauthorized AIDS, by the educational institution is expelled from the sample.
(2). Occurs during or after a test presumption that an examinee has unduly obtained or provided help, has released someone else's work for his own or used their own previously rated work without reference, reported this to the educational institution. The presumption will be confirmed, and this action has been, or could have an impact on the assessment, will ban the educational institution the examinee from the sample.
(3). Exhibit a examinee disruptive behavior, can the educational institution to expel the examinee from the sample. In less serious cases, the educational institution only a warning.
(4). The educational institution may in the cases referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3, under aggravating circumstances, decide that the examinee must be expelled from the institution in a shorter or longer period. In such cases, be given a written warning that repetition may result in permanent expulsion.
(5). An eviction under paragraph 1-3 imply that any character for the test in question lapses, and that the examinee has used a test setting, see. Article 6, paragraphs 3 and 4.
(6). An examinee must know the handing over of a written reply with his signature to confirm that the task is done without undue help, see. paragraphs 1 and 2.
§ 20. The educational institution may hold the trial at a Danish representation or other places abroad, with the exception of samples pursuant to section 12, where it is justified by the fact that the examinee for practical or economic reasons, cannot participate in the institution's samples in Denmark, and when the examinee and test place is concerned consent. Organisation of Danish samples abroad shall take place in accordance with the Executive order rules in General.
(2). The educational institution may authorize a person abroad to take charge of the practical execution of the test.
(3). The sample may be held as a video conference. The educational institution shall appoint or approve a supervisor, who should be with the examinee during the test. Examiner and Examiner (s) can reside elsewhere, but must examine and give the characters after the publication in General.
§ 21. The educational institution shall bear the Special costs associated with sample organisation abroad.
(2). By conducting tests on Danish representations abroad will find the notice of payment for service operations in foreign service application.
(3). The educational institution may extend the examinee fully or partially pay the costs which the institution has held in conjunction with the test organization. It is a condition that the examinee prior writing has declared itself willing to pay those costs on the basis of one of the educational institution informed estimates of the amount of the expected size. The educational institution can make sample holding of that amount must be paid in advance.
Evaluators (examiner and Examiner)
§ 22. An examiner must have
1) incoming and current knowledge of education's assumptions, goals and methods
2) specific competence in one or more academic areas, which form part of the training, and
3) current knowledge of education uses, including knowledge of the purchaser's situation and needs.
(2). In a tested Organization informs the educational institution censor on the applicable rules for the training, including this notice, as well as supplying the censor with other material relevant to the censorernes company.
§ 23. The censors shall not be employed at the educational institution where they are to act as censors.
(2). By allocating work to the examiner that there
1) involvement of censors from several educational institutions and censors from the relevant labour market (customer_id censors) by the organisation of censorship within a given education,
2) regularly involved new censors by allocating external examiners ' work,
3) not present individual mutual censorship within a period of 2 years and
4) not present individual repeated censorship within a period of 2 years in addition to the one exam left, one semester or one semester.
(3). For examiner applies the provisions of the administrative procedure code on conflict of interest and confidentiality.
§ 24. By a second examiner in sudden decline and or similar, where it has not been possible to summon a censor, the educational institution shall designate a person to censor, which meets the requirements set out in section 22 and section 23.
(2). By higher education to the educational institution as soon as possible inform the examiner the Presidency for the designation in accordance with paragraph 1.
§ 25. Examiner should
1) ensure that the tests are consistent with the objectives and other requirements, as laid down in the regulations or in accordance with regulations,
2) contribute to and ensure that the tests are carried out in accordance with the applicable rules, and
3) contribute to and ensure that examinees are given a uniform and fair treatment, and that their performance get a reliable appraisal, that is in accordance with the rules of scoring and other rules for the training.
(2). Examiner and examiner must make notes on rendering and character setting for personal use when preparing an opinion of a potential appeal. The notes to be stored for 1 year.
section 26. Notes censor that the circumstances referred to in section 25 (1) are not fulfilled, or get the examiner to suspect significant problems or deficiencies in the educational institution's conduct of a training, the censor reporting thereof to the institution. The educational institution shall forward the notification to the Ministry of education with his comments. By higher education forwarded notification, with a copy to the external examiners ' Presidency.
For samples in basic vocational education
§ 27. The institutions shall appoint examiners, see. However, article 12, paragraph 2, and section 28, paragraph 1. Educational institutions are responsible for ensuring that the appointed censors meets the requirements of section 22 (1).
(2). An overview of the designated Examiners may, in accordance with Ministry of quantification are assembled in a censor catalog, from which the educational institution shall appoint examiners, in agreement with the second examiner in institution and apportion the work in accordance with the rules of the censor section 23.
(3). Examiner shall issue, at the request of the Ministry report on exam holding and exam results.
section 28. The Ministry of education may appoint special censors, who replaces the educational institution's designation of examiners pursuant to section 27, paragraph 1.
(2). The Ministry of education shall notify the educational institutions not later than two months before the test in question is held, for which samples special examiners appointed.
(3). The special examiners shall deliver in accordance with Ministry of quantification, a report on the examination process.
section 29. Examiner at the individual test is the or the teachers who have taught the examinee.
(2). In the absence of special circumstances, including eksaminators decay due to illness, the educational institution may appoint someone else to the examiner.
(3). Examiner can ask in-depth questions to the examinee.
For tests in higher education
section 30. The samples are either internal or external.
(2). By internal assessment tests shall be carried out by one or more teachers appointed by the educational institution (the examiner).
(3). By the external evaluation of the examiner and tests shall be carried out by one or more examiners, who are appointed by the Ministry of education.
(4). External tests will cover key areas of training. At least half of the training in terms of ECTS credits for each student must be documented by external tests, with less that in the notice for the individual training is certainly different.
section 31. The Ministry of education creates for each higher education a nationwide Corps of court-appointed examiners, irrespective of whether the programme is offered at one or more educational institutions. An external examiners may also include several courses, if they are related, and the number of censors to justify it.
(2). External evaluator Corps must be composed in such a way that the total Corps covers all the disciplines or disciplines that are part of the training, and the employment area, which the education aims.
(3). At least a third of the censors in the examiner Corps must be persons who have their main employment outside of the educational institutions providing higher education in one of the areas of employment, education aims (customer_id censors). A smaller share of the downstream censors can occur when particular circumstances justify it.
section 32. The Ministry of education will appoint censors for the external tests on the recommendation of the educational institutions in accordance with the requirements of section 22 (1). The Ministry may appoint other censors than of educational institutions-designate. It should as far as possible, be sought that in nanotoxicology is an equal distribution of male and female examiners, and that included censors associated with foreign educational institutions in external evaluator Corps for the courses and subjects, where appropriate.
(2). An overview of court-appointed Examiners may, in accordance with the Ministry's quantification are assembled in a censor catalog.
(3). External examiners are appointed for 4 years at a time. For each new appointment period replaced at least one quarter of the censors in nanotoxicology. There may, however, within the period are hereby appointed additional censors.
(4). The Ministry can bring an external examiner appointment to an end before the expiry of the term.
section 33. An appointed examiner shall
1) Act as external examiner at the education, profession or to external samples, see. section 25 and section 26,
2) collaborate in the tasks referred to in section 35,
3) at the end of the make a report about terminens exam exam flow to the educational institution and the Presidency, of the basic regulation. section 35 (2), nr. 2 and 3, and
4) involved in the processing of complaints about the tests, see. section 45, paragraph 2, and section 50, paragraph (2).
§ 34. Censors in every external examiners choose for a 4-year period a censor President and one or more Vice-Chairmen. By teacher education and teacher training, however, a Vice-President shall be appointed within each discipline or field of study. The previous censor Presidency is organising the elections.
(2). External evaluator Corps President and Vice-President/Vice Presidents form a censor Presidency. At least one of the censors of the Presidency must be customer censor.
(3). Censor the Presidency represents the censors in the examiner Corps in the face of the Ministry and the educational institution (s).
section 35. Censor the Presidency distributes after consultation with the educational institution or institutions the tasks for censorship among the censors in the examiner Corps in accordance with the rules laid down in article 23. The Ministry of education may, however, decide to censor tasks within an external examiners shall be imposed by the Ministry.
(2). Censor the Presidency must as part of quality assurance of education
1) advise the Ministry of education by the appointment of censors,
2) advise the educational institutions and the Ministry of education on the basis of the external examiners ' reports on the quality of education and appropriateness in relation to the labour market and in relation to higher education,
3) submit an annual report to the educational institutions and the Ministry of education. Report is issued on the basis of reports, see censorernes. section 33, no. 3, and are included in the basis for evaluations of education or profession,
4) respond to consultations on significant changes in education regulations and curricula, and
5) incidentally be available for duties related to the censor company, which the Presidency get conferred by the other rules.
(3). Censor Presidency contributes to an ongoing dialogue on the evolution of the training or the subject/subject area at least every two years to hold the external examiners ' meetings with censors in nanotoxicology and contact meetings between training institutions and the censors.
§ 36. Educational institutions covers expenditure to censor the Presidency and censorernes work. Educational institutions provide, subject to prior agreement with the censor Presidency administrative and practical assistance.
section 37. The basis for the assessment is the testees ' individual performance, including individual parts of a group made to order product, unless otherwise specified by the Ministry of education. The assessment is done, moreover, in accordance with the rules of the ordonnance on grading scale and the other judgement.
(2). In higher education, the evaluation of bachelor project, final thesis or final project in addition to the professional content also places emphasis on the testees ' wording and spelling ability, if exam performance is written in Danish. The educational institution may exempt from here to examinees, documenting a relevant specific impairments. It is determined in the curriculum, how the wording and spelling ability is part of the overall assessment of exam performance, see. section 4, paragraph 2, no. 3, with the professional content, however, must be weighted the greatest weight. Wording and spelling ability may be included in the assessment of the other samples.
(3). In higher education, all tests passed.
section 38. By samples, where the rating is not communicated to the examinee immediately after the test, the educational institution shall fix a date on which the assessment will be announced. The date shall be communicated to the examinees ' at the same time with the announcement of the test organization, either by opening or otherwise.
§ 39. The educational institution shall issue the evidence of completed training referred to in article 6. However, section 12, unless otherwise specified in the notice for the individual training, and for single-subject courses completed in accordance with the rules on open education.
(2). The certificate must, as a minimum, contain the following information:
1) The graduates names and cpr. Nr. or other similar identification.
2) the issuing authority.
3) designation and Training home.
4) the individual programme elements, for higher education specified in ECTS credits.
5) The training elements that are carried out at the test in, stating the achieved ratings.
6) The otherwise documented educational elements.
7) Merit-borne training elements and samples, where appropriate with an indication of the achieved ratings as Passed, Approved or a character in accordance with the notice karakterskala.
8) Exam language, if the sample is carried out in a foreign language other than Norwegian and Swedish.
9) The designation education gives graduates the right to in Danish and translated into English.
(3). The graduates can also get his certificate, drawn up in English.
(4). Annexed to the proof of a basic vocational training shall issue, at the request of the educational institution graduates a foreign language Certificate Supplement that in accordance with the indicative guidelines adopted by The European Union describes the training as well as provide information about the institution and its manner of means education and placement in the Danish educational system.
(5). As an annex to the certificate of higher education the educational institution shall issue an English-language Diploma Supplement in accordance with the EU Commission, the Council of Europe and UNESCO/CÈPES developed the standard model describes the training as well as provide information about the institution and its manner of means education and placement in the Danish educational system.
(6). The certificate must not contain information on specific test conditions, see. § 18.
(7). Total proof of training which is carried out by several educational institutions, issued by the institution where the student or the student last enrolled.
(8). For pupils or students who leave without having completed the training, the educational institution shall issue, at the request of the student or the student documentation for successful parts of education, of higher education specified in ECTS credits.
§ 40. Characters and possibly exam averages for the individual examinee are reported to the Ministry after the Ministry's determination.
(2). The educational institution shall keep the information necessary to issue certificates in 30 years after the end of the test or exam.
(3). An educational institution shall cease to exist or for any other reason is unable to store the documents in accordance with paragraph 2, the institution must ensure other reassuring storage after the applicable rules.
(4). As regards the exams as a journeyman's test and exams as part of a journeyman's test, it is the Technical Committee, which have storage obligation as set out in paragraphs 2 and 3, if the Committee in accordance with the rules of the education issue the evidence of education and training.
Errors and omissions by samples
§ 41. Will be the educational institution in connection with a sample point out errors and deficiencies can be remedied, it shall take the institution, if applicable. After discussion with evaluators or task authors, a decision on how the repair must be done.
(2). By significant errors and deficiencies offers educational institution reassessment or catch-up session, see. However, paragraph 4. This offer is valid for all the examinees whose trial suffers from the same flaws.
(3). By deficiencies of the particularly serious nature of the educational institution can decide whether to cancel the test and arrange for a catch-up session held already, see. However, paragraph 4.
(4). Are the tasks by the test proposed by the Ministry of education, the educational institution involving the Ministry, acting in accordance with paragraph 1 – 3 after consultation with the institution.
§ 42. Reassessment and catch-up session pursuant to section 41, paragraph 2, may not result in a lower rating. Catch-up session, due to the cancellation of the original sample, see. section 41, paragraph 3, may result in a lower rating.
(2). The educational institution may withhold evidence, see. Chapter 8 until the case is settled.
Complaints about the tests
section 43. Complaints about the characteristics of the samples submitted individually by the examinee to the educational institution. The complaint must be in writing and reasoned. If the examinee is subject to parental authority, the complaint also must be submitted by the custodial parent.
(2). The complaint shall be submitted within 2 weeks after the assessment of the test is announced in the usual way. The educational institution may grant a derogation from the time limit, where exceptional circumstances justify it.
(3). For purposes of the appeal to the examinee with a copy of the task and asked by samples with a written reply also copy of own task response.
§ 44. The examinee can continue training during appeal proceedings, except where otherwise provided in this Ordinance or in accordance with the Ordinance.
§ 45. The complaint may relate to
1) examination base, including sample questions, tasks and the like, as well as its relationship to the training objectives and requirements,
2) rehearsal or
(2). The educational institution shall submit without delay the complaint of the original evaluators, see. However, paragraph 3, which has a period of usually 2 weeks to deliver an opinion. The evaluators will comment on the professional issues in the complaint. The complainant shall be given the opportunity to comment on the statements, within a period of typically 1 week.
(3). When the tasks by the sample has been made by the Ministry of education, the educational institution immediately forwards complaints relating to sample base, to the Ministry, accompanied by the institution's opinion.
§ 46. The educational institution determines the complaint on the basis of the Examiners ' professional opinion and the complainant's comments on the opinion, see. However, paragraph 2.
(2). Are the tasks by the test proposed by the Ministry of education, the Ministry shall take a decision on the complaints about the test base and, moreover, to what extent, to be given offers of catch-up session.
§ 47. The decision, which must be in writing and reasoned, can go out on
1) a new assessment (reassessment)
2) bid for new trial (catch-up session) or
3) that the complainant not dismissed in the complaint.
(2). Only when the assessors agree on it, can the educational institution's decision go out on that the complainant not dismissed.
(3). The educational institution shall immediately notify the complainant and the evaluators notice of decision.
section 48. To retaken and reassessment appointed new Appraisers. The Ministry of education has appointed external examiner at the original trial under section 28, shall notify the educational institution Ministry of its decision of the appeal, and the Ministry shall appoint a new examiner.
(2). Reassessment or catch-up session must take place as soon as possible.
(3). Catch-up session can result in a lower rating, while the reassessment cannot result in a lower rating.
(4). Accepted offers of catch-up session as a result of the complaint, and the proof is issued, without prejudice. § 39, paragraph 1, should the educational institution involving the proof until the assessment is available, and, where appropriate, issue a new one.
Appeal of the decision in higher education
§ 49. In higher education, the complainant can bring educational institution's decision regarding professional issues, see. section 46 (1) for the institution set up a Board of appeal, see. § 50, acting.
(2). The complainant shall submit the appeal to the educational institution. The appeal must be in writing and reasoned.
(3). The appeal must be submitted within 2 weeks after, that the complainant is made aware of the educational institution's decision. The educational institution may grant a derogation from the time limit, where exceptional circumstances justify it.
§ 50. The educational institution shall set up an Appeals Board as soon as possible after the submission of an appeal. There may be reduced permanent Appeals Board. The educational institution shall bear the cost of the appeal.
(2). The Committee consists of two court-appointed examiners, a teacher and a student eligible examination within the subject area.
(3). Censor-in-Office referred to in article 6. section 34, paragraph 1, shall be appointed by the two censors. The President shall appoint an examiner of the censors, as Chairman of the Board. The President can appoint himself as censor censor or as President.
(4). The educational institution shall be appointed by the teacher and the student eligible for examination.
§ 51. To the Appeals Board can be a quorum, all Committee members participate in the Committee's discussion and all the documents in the case be forwarded to all members. The discussion can be carried out in writing, including by electronic means, if there is a consensus among the Committee members about the written treatment of the basic regulation. However, paragraph 2.
(2). There is no consensus in the Board of appeal, ends the discussion at a meeting where all of the Committee members must be present. Ends the discussion with a vote, and there is a tie, the Chairman's vote is important.
§ 52. Appeal Board's decision, which must be in writing and reasoned, can go out on
1) a reassessment by different assessors,
2) deals on the new appraisers or retaken by,
3) that the complainant not dismissed in appeal.
(2). Retaken and reassessment is done according to the rules in section 48.
§ 53. Appeal Board's decision shall be communicated to the educational institution as soon as possible and at the winter graduation within 2 months and by summer exam no later than 3 months after the appeal is submitted to the institution.
(2). Appeal can not be dealt with within this period, the educational institution inform the complainant as soon as possible, indicating the reasons for it and information about when the appeal is expected to be finalised.
(3). The educational institution provides notice of the complainant as soon as possible and the examiners copy of the decision.
(4). The Appeals Board decision cannot be brought before another administrative authority, see. However, § 54.
Appeals from decisions of an educational institution or an Appeals Board
§ 54. Complaints about the decisions taken by the educational institution or of the Appeals Board, see. section 49, in accordance with the rules of the order, may be brought before the Ministry of education, when the complaint relates to legal questions. The complaint shall be submitted to the educational institution, which shall deliver its opinion that the complainant shall be given the opportunity to comment within a period of typically 1 week. The educational institution shall forward the complaint, the opinion and the complainant's comments to the Ministry of education. The closing date for the submission of a complaint to the educational institution is 2 weeks from the day the decision is communicated to the complainant.
§ 55. The examinee has the copyright to the products obtained as a result of a trial, in accordance with the rules on copyright, see. However, paragraph 3.
(2). The examinee has also to ownership of these products against the payment of any costs of materials, which are used in the sample, see. However, paragraph 3. If the examinee does not do property rights applicable within 2 months after the result of the assessment is announced, passes ownership of the educational institution.
(3). Involve rehearsal parties outside the educational institution, the prior agreement between the institution, the examinee and the third party, the extent to which the respect of applicable copyright rules is entitled to apply the results obtained as part of the trial process, including any information relating to the third party's conditions that occur in the task solutions, may be published.
section 56. The Ministry of education may dispense with notice, when it is justified by exceptional circumstances, except in the cases referred to in § 5, paragraph 3, article 9, paragraph 3, article 37, paragraph 2, article 43, paragraph 2, and section 49 (3) ...
(2). The Ministry of education may waive the notice rules be waived as part of experimental and development work.
Date of entry into force and transitional provisions
§ 57. The notice shall enter into force on the 1. September 2009 and have effect for samples started 1. September 2009 or later.
Paragraph Bekendtgørelse nr. 766 of 26. June 2007 on the tests and exams in vet should be repealed.
(3). Executive Order No. 332 of 25. May 1993 on the censor institution for certain higher education under the Ministry of education shall continue to apply for the notice included the courses, which are not covered by this Ordinance.
The Ministry of education, the 17. August 2009 P.M.V. Jarl Damgaard head/Kirsten Lippert
Search Translated Laws of Denmark